Top Banner
• Introduction – Why digital? – Why dual energy? • Experimental setup • Image acquisition • Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH ASIC for with the RX64DTH ASIC for dual energy radiology dual energy radiology
43

Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Jan 18, 2018

Download

Documents

Aleesha Hampton

Introduction: why digital ? Digital radiography has well known advantages over conventional screen-film systems –Enhance detecting efficiency w.r.t. screen-film –Image analysis –Easy data transfer
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

• Introduction– Why digital?– Why dual energy?

• Experimental setup• Image acquisition• Image processing and results

A silicon microstrip system A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH ASIC for with the RX64DTH ASIC for

dual energy radiologydual energy radiology

Page 2: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

1) University of Eastern Piedmont and INFN, Alessandria, Italy L. Ramello;

2) University and INFN, Torino, Italy P. Giubellino, A. Marzari-Chiesa, F. Prino;

3) University and INFN, Ferrara, Italy; M. Gambaccini, A. Taibi, A. Tuffanelli, A. Sarnelli;

4) University and INFN, Bologna, Italy G. Baldazzi, D. Bollini;

5) AGH Univ. of Science and Technology, Cracow, Poland W. Dabrowski, P. Grybos, K. Swientek, P. Wiacek;

6) University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium P. Van Espen;

7) Univ. de los Andes, Colombia C. Avila, J. Lopez Gaitan, J.C. Sanabria;

8) CEADEN, Havana, Cuba A.E. Cabal, C. Ceballos, A. Diaz Garcia, L. Bolaños;

9) CINVESTAV, Mexico City, Mexico L.M. Montano;

The CollaborationThe Collaboration

Page 3: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Introduction: why digital ?Introduction: why digital ?• Digital radiography has well known advantages over

conventional screen-film systems– Enhance detecting efficiency w.r.t. screen-film

– Image analysis– Easy data transfer

Page 4: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

• Dual energy techniques

• GOAL: improve image contrast

Based on different energy dependence

of different materials

Enhance detail visibility (SNR)

Decrease dose to the patient

Decrease contrast media concentration

Introduction: why dual Introduction: why dual energy ?energy ?

Page 5: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Example 1: dual energy Example 1: dual energy mammographymammography

Page 6: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Example 1: dual energy Example 1: dual energy mammographymammography

E 15-20 keV:Signal from cancer tissue deteriorated by the adipose tissue signal

E 30-40 keVCancer tissue not visible, image allows to map glandular and adipose tissues

Page 7: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Example 2: angiographyExample 2: angiography•Angiography = X-ray examination of blood vessels

determine if the vessels are diseased, narrowed or blocked Injection of a contrast medium (Iodine) which absorbs X-ray

differently from surrounding tissues

•Coronary angiographyIodine must be injected into the heart or very close to itA catheter is inserted into the femoral artery and managed up

to the heart→Long fluoroscopy exposure time to guide the catheter→Invasive examination

•Why not to inject iodine in a peripheral vein?Because lower iodine concentration would be obtained,

requiring longer exposures and larger doses to obtain a good image

But, if the image contrast could be enhanced in some way…

Page 8: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Example 2: angiography at Example 2: angiography at the iodine K-edge (II)the iodine K-edge (II)

Iodine injected in patient vessels acts as radio-opaque contrast medium

Dramatic change of iodine absorption coeff. at K-edge energy (33 keV)

Subtraction of 2 images taken with photons of 2 energies (below and above the K-edge)→ in the resulting image only the iodine signal remains and all other materials are canceled

Page 9: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experimental setupExperimental setup• To implement dual energy imaging we need:

• a dichromatic beam• a position- and energy-sensitive detector

Quasi-monochromatic beams • ordinary X-ray tube + mosaic

crystals • instead of truly monochromatic

synchrotron radiationAdvantages: cost, dimensions, availability in hospitals

Linear array of silicon microstrips + electronics for single photon counting•Binary readout

•1 or 2 discriminators (and counters) per channel

•Integrated counts for each pixel are readout

• Scanning required to build 2D image

Page 10: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experimental setup: beam (1)Experimental setup: beam (1)

Bdchn

BE sin2..

Bragg Diffraction on Highly Oriented Pyrolitic Grafite Crystal

W anode tube

1st and 2nd Bragg harmonics E and 2E are obtained in the same beam

Collimator

Page 11: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experimental setup: beam (2)Experimental setup: beam (2)

Bdchn

BE sin2..

Bragg Diffraction on Highly Oriented Pyrolitic Grafite Crystal

W anode tube

Double slit collimator

Two spatially separated beams with different energies E-E and E+E obtained in 2 separate beams

Page 12: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

More on the dichromatic beamMore on the dichromatic beam

incidentspectraat 3 energysettings …

… spectra after 3 cm plexiglass

(measured with HPGe detector)

Page 13: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

• Fully parallel signal processing for all channels• Binary architecture for readout electronics

1 bit information (yes/no) is extracted from each stripThreshold scans needed to extract analog information

• Counts integrated over the measurement period transmitted to DAQ

data, control

Silicon strip detector Integrated circuit

100 m

current pulses

X-rays

PC

N. I. I/O cards PCI-DIO-N. I. I/O cards PCI-DIO-96 96

and DAQCard-DIO-24and DAQCard-DIO-24

Experimental setup: Single Photon Experimental setup: Single Photon Counting SystemCounting System

Page 14: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experimental setup: PCBExperimental setup: PCB

detectorpitch adapter

ASICs

PCB:- One 400 strip detector- Pitch adapter- 6 RX64 chips

384 equipped channels- connector to DAQ card

2 protoype detectors:a) 6 x Single threshold RX64b) 6 x Dual threshold RX64

Page 15: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Detecting systemDetecting system

Chip RX64 → counts incident photons on each strip of the detector

4 cm

6.4 mm10 strip = 1 mm

micro-bondings

Silicon microstrip detectoreach strip is an independent detector which gives an electric signal when an X-ray photon crosses it and interacts with a silicon atom

Knowing from which strip the electric signal comes from,the position of the incoming X-ray phonton is reconstructed.

Page 16: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Why silicon detectors?Why silicon detectors?Main characteristics of silicon detectors:• speed of the order of 10 ns• spatial resolution of the order of 10 m•small amount of material

0.003 X0 for a typical 300 m thickness

• excellent mechanical properties• good resolution in the deposited energy

3.6 eV of deposited energy needed to create a pair of charges, vs. 30 eV in a gas detector

Page 17: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Silicon sensor diodeSilicon sensor diode•The impinging ionizing particles generate electron-hole pairs •The impinging photons which interact in the detector volume create an electron (via Photoelectric, Compton or Pair Production)

•The electron ionizes the surrounding atoms generating electron-hole pairs

• Electron and holes drift to the electrodes under the effect of the electric field present in the detector volume. •The electron-hole current in the detector induces a signal at the electrodes on the detector faces.Metal contact

n+-type implant

n-type bulk

Charged particle -V

+V

electron

hole

P+-type implant

photon

photoelectron

ReversebiasE

Page 18: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Why reverse biased diode?Why reverse biased diode?•The amount of charge deposited in the silicon detector is very small

≈5500 electrons are produced by a 20 keV photons making photoelectric effect in the silicon

Forward-biased junction: the signal would be masked by the fluctuations of the current which the applied field makes flow even in high resistivity, hyper-pure silicon.Reverse-biased junction: allows to obtain the necessary electric field and only a very small “dark” current also at room temperature.

-V

+V

depleted region

Increasing the polarization voltage, it is possible to extend the depletion layer down to the backplane.

To have full efficiency, the polarization voltage must be high enough to deplete the full detector thickness (typically 300 m)

junction

NOT GOOD

Page 19: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Silicon Microstrips detectorsSilicon Microstrips detectors• A micro-strip detector is a silicon detector segmented in long, narrow elements.

•Each strip is an independent p-n reverse-biased junction• Provides the measurement of one coordinate of the particle’s crossing point with high precision (down to 1 m).

N-type substrate

P+n+

Al

P+

SiO2

AC coupling to electronics

SiO2AlDC coupling to electronics

Page 20: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experimental setup: silicon Experimental setup: silicon detectordetector

Parameter Value

Depth 300 μm

Strip length 10 mm

Number of strips 400

Strip pitch 100 μm

Depletion voltage 20-23 V

Leakeage curr. (22º C) 50-60 pA

Inactive region thickn. 765 μm

Designed and fabricated by ITC-IRST, Trento, Italy

Page 21: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experimental setup: RX64 chipExperimental setup: RX64 chipCracow U.M.M. design - (28006500 m2) - CMOS 0.8 µm process(1) (1) 64 front-end channels

a) preamplifierb) shaperc) 1 or 2 discriminators

(2)(2) (1 or 2)x64 pseudo-random counters (20-bit)(3)(3) internal DACs: 8-bit threshold setting and 5-bit for bias settings(4)(4) internal calibration circuit (square wave 1mV-30 mV)(5)(5) control logic and I/O circuit (interface to external bus)

11 22

3344

55Det

ecto

r

Page 22: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Detector efficiencyDetector efficiency

• Front geometry– Strip orthogonal to the beam– 70 m of Al light shield

• Edge-on geometry– Strip parallel to the beam– 765 m of inactive Si– Better efficiency for E > 18 keV

• Efficiency calculation– X-ray absorbed if interacts in passive regions– X-ray detected if makes photoelectric effect in active regions

Page 23: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Imaging testImaging test1-dimensional array of strips → 2D image obtained by scanning

Cd-109 source (22.24 keV)

Detector

Collimator (0.5 mm)

Tes

t O

bjec

t

5 mm

Page 24: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Imaging testImaging test1-dimensional array of strips → 2D image obtained by scanning

0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

1 0 0

1 1 0

1 2 0

1 3 0

1 4 0

1 5 0

1 6 0

1 7 0

1 8 0

1 9 0

2 0 0

2 1 0

C a n a le s

Pasos

0

3 , 0 0 0

6 , 0 0 0

9 , 0 0 0

1 2 , 0 0

1 5 , 0 0

1 8 , 0 0

2 1 , 0 0

2 4 , 0 0

Scan

nin

g

Page 25: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

System calibration setup in System calibration setup in AlessandriaAlessandria

Detector in Front config.Fluorescence target

(Cu, Ge, Mo, Nb, Zr, Ag, Sn)

Cu anode X-ray tube

→ X-ray energies = characteristic lines of target material

Page 26: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

150

100

50

0

Cou

nts

500400300200100

Threshold (mV)

Source Am+Rb target Source Am+Mo target Source Am+Ag target Tube+Cu target Tube+Ge target Tube+Mo target Tube+Ag target Tube+Sn target

Cu K

Mo K

Ge K

Rb K

Ag K

Sn K

Ag K

Mo K

Sn K

System TpGAINV/el.

ENC Energy resolution

6 x RX64 0.7 s 64 ≈170 el. ≈0.61 keV

6 x RX64DTH 0.8 s 47 ≈ 200 el. ≈0.72 keV

241241Am source with rotary target holder (targets: Cu, Rb, Mo, Ag, Ba)Am source with rotary target holder (targets: Cu, Rb, Mo, Ag, Ba)Cu-anode X-ray tube with fluorescence targets (Cu, Ge, Mo, Ag, Sn)Cu-anode X-ray tube with fluorescence targets (Cu, Ge, Mo, Ag, Sn)

System calibrationSystem calibration

Page 27: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

• K-edge subtraction imaging with contrast medium Cancel background structures by subtracting 2 images taken at energies just

below and above the K-edge of the contrast medium Suited for angiography at iodine (gadolinium) K-edge

- Cancel background structures to enhance vessel visibility Possible application in mammography (study vascularization extent)

- Hypervascularity characterizes most malignant formations • Dual energy projection algorythm

Make the contrast between 2 chosen materials vanish by measuring the logarithmic transmission of the incident beam at two energies and using a projection algorithm [Lehmann et al., Med. Phys. 8 (1981) 659]

Suited for dual energy mammography– remove contrast between the two normal tissues (glandular

and adipose), enhancing the contrast of the pathology– Single exposure dual-energy mammography reduces

radiation dose and motion artifacts

Dual energy imagingDual energy imaging

Page 28: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

X-ray tube with dual energy output

Phantom

Detector box with 2 collimators

1.1. X-ray tube + mosaic crystal and 2 collimators to provide dual-energy output X-ray tube + mosaic crystal and 2 collimators to provide dual-energy output

- E1= 31.5 keV, E2 =35.5 keV (above and below iodine k-edge)- E1= 31.5 keV, E2 =35.5 keV (above and below iodine k-edge)

2.2. Detector box with two detectors aligned with two collimatorsDetector box with two detectors aligned with two collimators

3.3. Step wedge phantom made of PMMA + Al Step wedge phantom made of PMMA + Al with 4 iodine solution filled with 4 iodine solution filled cavities of 1 or 2 mm diametercavities of 1 or 2 mm diameter

Angiography setupAngiography setup

Page 29: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

15

10

5

0

pixe

ls

3002001000pixels

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

log

con

tegg

i

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

-1,0

-0,8

-0,6

-0,4

-0,2

0,0

0,2 Conc(I) = 370 mg/ml Measurement Simulation

ln[c

ount

(E=3

5.5K

ev)]

- ln[

coun

t(E=3

1.5K

ev)]

Strip Number

15

10

5

0

pixe

ls

3002001000pixels

161412108642

Con

tegg

i ( x

103 )

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

0,0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1,0 Conc(I) = 370 mg/ml E = 31.5 KeV

Measurement Simulation

Coun

ts /

Max

.Cou

nts

Strip Number

E = 31.5 keVE = 31.5 keV

15

10

5

0

pixe

ls

3002001000pixels

654321C

onte

ggi (

x103 )

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

0,0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1,0

Strip Number

Measurement Simulation

Conc(I) = 370 mg/ml E = 35.5 KeV

Coun

ts /

Max

.Cou

nts

E = 35.5 keV

5.3125.351 lnln NCNC logarithmic subtraction

Phantom structure not

visible in final image

Angiographic test results (I)Angiographic test results (I)

Page 30: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

15

10

5

0

pixe

ls

3002001000pixels

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0.0

log

con

tegg

i

Conc = 370 mg / mlConc = 370 mg / ml

15

10

5

0

pixe

ls

3002001000pixels

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

log

cont

eggi

Conc = 92.5 mg / mlConc = 92.5 mg / ml

15

10

5

0

pixe

ls

3002001000pixels

-0.15-0.10-0.050.000.050.100.15

log

cont

eggi

Conc = 23.1 mg / mlConc = 23.1 mg / ml

100

80

60

40

20

0

SN

R

4003002001000Concentrazione (mg/ml)

cavità 4 teor. cavità 4 cavità 3 teor. cavità 3 cavità 2 teor. cavità 2 cavità 1 teor. cavità 1

Possible decrease of iodine concentration keeping the same rad. dose

Angiographic test results (II)Angiographic test results (II)

Page 31: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Results with a second Results with a second phantomphantom

140 140

120 120

100 100

80 80

60 60

40 40

20 20

0 0

300

um p

ixel

300

300

200

200

100

100

0

0

100 um pixel

140 140

120 120

100 100

80 80

60 60

40 40

20 20

0 0

300

um p

ixel

300

300

200

200

100

100

0

0

100 um pixel

140 140

120 120

100 100

80 80

60 60

40 40

20 20

300

um p

ixel

300

300

200

200

100

100

0

0

100 um pixel

PhantomDigital Subtraction

Angiography

Dual Energy Angiography

smaller cavity (=0.4 mm) visible in DEA and not in DSA

Iodine conc. = 95 mg/ml

Page 32: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Dual energy projection Dual energy projection algorithmalgorithm

The mass attenuation coefficient μ of any material at a given energy E is expressed as a combination of the coefficients of any two suitable materials and :

E

aEaE

21

The logarithmic attenuation M = μξtξ of the material of thickness tξ is measured at two different energies: low (El) and high (Eh):

lhlh

lhhl

lhlh

hllh

hhh

lll

EEEEEMEMA

EEEEEMEM

A

EAEAM

EAEAM

2

1

21

21

A1 and A2 represent the thicknesses of the two base materials which would provide the same X-ray attenuation as material ξ.

Page 33: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

C

C90°

M1

R

1

M2

2

If a monochromatic beam of intensity I0 goes through material ξ which is partly replaced by another material ψ …

I0

I1 I2

ξψ

… then the vertexes of log. attenuation vectors M2 (material ξ) and M1 (mat. ξ + ψ) lie on a line R which is defined only by the properties of materials α, β, ξ and ψ. Projecting along direction C, orthogonal

to R, with the contrast cancellation angle :

… it is possible to cancel the contrast between materials ξ and ψ: both M1 and M2 will project to the same vector

A2

A1

Dual energy projection Dual energy projection algorithmalgorithmThe logarithmic attenuation M in a given pixel can be represented

as a vector having components A1 and A2 in the basis plane, the modulus will then be proportional to the gray level of that pixel

sincos 21 AAC

Page 34: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Mammographic phantomMammographic phantom• Three components: polyethylene (PE), PMMA and

water to simulate the attenuation coeff. (cm-1) of the adipose, glandular and cancerous tissues in the breast

S. Fabbri et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 47 (2002) 1-13

E _fat _gland _canc

20 .456 .802 .844

40 .215 .273 .281

E μ_PE μ_PMMA μ_water

20 .410 .680 .810

40 .225 .280 .270

Page 35: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

300

pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

Image processing (1)Image processing (1)

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

Low thr. High thr.

Measured (raw)

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

16 keV

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

32 keVHE and LE imagesCorrect for:

1. pixels with huge n. of counts (bad counter conversion)

2. dead pixels3. X-ray beam fluctuations4. subtract high threshold

image from low threshold one

5. correct for spatial inhomogeneities of beam and detector extracted from flat-field profiles

Page 36: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

16 – 32 keV 18 – 36 keV

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

1= PMMA 2=water3=PE 4=(water+PE)

Image processing (2)Image processing (2)

Low statistics due to:1) 2nd order harmonic2) dectecting efficiency

Page 37: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Simulation with MCNPSimulation with MCNP

1=detector2=PMMA3=water4=PE

MCNP-4C simulation with ENDF/B-VI library• Photons and electrons

tracked through the phantom and the detector (including the inactive region in front of the strips)

• Energy deposition in each strip recorded

• histogram of counts vs. strip number filled

Top View

Side View

Page 38: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experiment vs. Simulation (1)Experiment vs. Simulation (1)RX64DTH 16 – 32 keV

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

simulation 16 – 32 keV

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

Page 39: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Experiment vs. Simulation Experiment vs. Simulation (1)(1)

3400

3200

3000

2800

2600

2400

2200

3002001000

Simul.16 keV Left Part Meas.16 keV Left Part

3400

3200

3000

2800

2600

2400

2200

3002001000

Simul.16 keV Right Part Meas.16 keV Right Part

3100

3000

2900

2800

2700

2600

3002001000

Simul.32 keV Left Part Meas.32 keV Left Part

3100

3000

2900

2800

2700

2600

3002001000

Simul.32 keV Right Part Meas.32 keV Right Part

Page 40: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Results (1): SNR vs. proj. Results (1): SNR vs. proj. angleangle100

80

60

40

20

0

SN

R

706050403020Angle (deg)

SNR PE-Water SNR PMMA-Water SNR PMMA-PE

5x5 pixels area

SNR = 9.6287 theta = 36.5deg

SNR = 4.7246 theta = 52.5degSNR = 3.1887

theta = 43deg

RX64DTH 16 – 32 keV

MCNP simulation160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

SN

R

706050403020Angle (deg)

SNR_PE_225_23_WAT225_3_5x5 SNR_PMMA_2_20_WAT225_3_5x5 SNR_PMMA_20_2_PE225_23_5x5

SNR = 23.176 theta = 35deg

SNR = 14.521 theta = 44.5deg

SNR = 9.2112 theta = 39deg

Cancellation angle for a pair given by SNR=0

Theoretical cancellation angles: PMMA-water 36.5° PE-water 40.5° PMMA-PE 45°

Page 41: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Results (2): SNR summaryResults (2): SNR summaryEnergy Canceled Contrast SNR SNR

(keV) materials material RX64* RX64DTH

PMMA-water PE 8.11 9.63

16-32 PE-water PMMA 2.53 3.19PE-PMMA water 3.96 4.72PMMA-water PE 7.43 5.14

18-36 PE-water PMMA 2.70 2.10PE-PMMA water 3.85 3.13PMMA-water PE 2.55 3.27

20-40 PE-water PMMA 0.67 1.07PE-PMMA water 0.89 1.58

* Previous version of ASIC, exposure with about 2x more incident photons

Page 42: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Results (3): Projected Results (3): Projected imagesimagesRX64DTH 16 – 32 keV simulation 16 – 32 keV

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

35º

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

44.5º

PMMA-water cancellationPMMA-PE cancellation

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

36.5º

300pixel

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

pixe

l

52.5º

Page 43: Introduction –Why digital? –Why dual energy? Experimental setup Image acquisition Image processing and results A silicon microstrip system with the RX64DTH.

Conclusion and OutlookConclusion and Outlook• We have developed a single photon counting silicon detector equipped

with the RX64DTH ASIC, with two selectable energy windows• The energy resolution of 0.8 keV (rms) is well adapted for dual energy

mammography and angiography• We have performed mammography imaging tests with a three-material

phantom– We have demonstrated the feasibility of contrast cancellation between two

materials, enhancing the visibility of small features in the third one• We have performed angiography imaging tests with 2 different phantoms

and iodine contrast medium– We have demonstrated the feasibility of logarithmic subtraction between two

images, enhancing contrast of small vessels also with lower iodate solution concentrations

• OUTLOOK: – Increase photon statistics at high energy, optimize exposure conditions– New detector materials, CZT?– Tests with a more realistic mammographic phantom