Introduction to existing ultra wideband (UWB) technologies Lic.Tech. Matti Hämäläinen Centre for Wireless Communications University of Oulu
Introduction to existing ultra wideband (UWB) technologies
Lic.Tech. Matti Hämäläinen
Centre for Wireless CommunicationsUniversity of Oulu
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu2/26
Contents
1. What is UWB?2. Regulation and standardization3. Competing technologies4. UWB applications5. Summary
Control boards of UWB transmitters that CWC have
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu3/26
What is UWB?
• Signal is defined as an ultra wideband if– -10 dB fractional bandwidth Bf > 20% or– signal bandwidth B > 500 MHz
• cf. BGSM = 200 kHz, BUMTS = 3.8 MHz, B802.11a = 16.6 MHz,BGPS = 20 MHz
LH
LHf ff
ffB+−
= 2
NB Wideband Ultra wideband
0 5% 20% … Fractional bandwidth
PSD
Frequency
Narrowband
Wideband
Ultra wideband
fc
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu4/26
Regulation and
standardization
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu5/26
Regulation and standardization
• Federal Communication Commission (FCC), USA – Notice of Inquire, 1998– Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 2000–– The First Report and OrderThe First Report and Order, 2002, 2002– Memorandum Opinion and Further
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 2003– The Second Report and Order and
Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, 2004
Anechoic chamber at Univ. of Oulu
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu6/26
Regulation and standardization
0 2 4 6 8 10 12-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
Frequency [GHz]
UW
B E
IRP
Em
issi
on le
vel [
dBm
/MH
z]
UWB Em is s ion Lim it
Indoor hand-heldOutdoor hand-heldFCC P art 15 Limit
• Output of the FCCFCC work– definition for UWB– radiation limits and
spectrum masks – unlicensed use of UWB
was accepted– use on board, in airplane,
fixed outdoors devices and toys are forbidden
In addition• through material radars, f < 960 MHz• 22 – 29 GHz is reserved for vehicular radars
with the same upper radiation limit.
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu7/26
Regulation and standardization• In Europe and Japan, the goal is to finalize
UWB regulation process during March 2006– more stringent mask might be adopted with
some interference mitigation mechanism• detection and avoid (DAA)• low duty cycle
UWB transmitters by CWC
Proposed Ofcom and ECC masks
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Frequency [MHz]
PSD
[dB
m/M
Hz]
Ofcom Choise 1 Choice 2Min. level Report 64 TEMP12 Rev.1
Japanese proposal
DAA is required
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu8/26
Regulation and standardization
• European Communications Committee (ECC) released a decision about the UWB regulation on 24th March, 2006– enters into force on 24 March 2006– implementation of the Decision, 1 October 2006
• ECC’s decision is applicable to radio technologies having a bandwidth wider than 50 MHz
• It is intended for communications; measurements; location; imaging; surveillance and medical applications– primarily for indoor use– unlicensed use
• Within a frequency band of 6 – 8.5 GHz UWB transmission without any mitigation techniques is allowed using the maximum PSD of -41.3 dBm/MHz.
NEW!
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu9/26
• A detection and avoid, or a low duty cycle interference mitigation method are proposed for a frequency band of 3.1 – 4.8 GHz – Since there is no interference mitigation requirement available
for the frequency band of 3.1 – 4.8 GHz, the proposal considers allowing the use of band between 4.2 – 4.8 GHz without any mitigation technique until 2010/2012
– Comments before 29 May 2006 are requested by the ECCECC limit
-100,0
-80,0
-60,0
-40,0
-20,0
0,00,0 2,0 4,0 6,0 8,0 10,0 12,0
Frequency [GHz]
PSD
[dBm
/MHz
]
Mean EIRPPeak EIRP
-85
-70
-41.3
-90
-65
-85
40 dB peak: dBm/50 MHz
cf. Japanese mask
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu10/26
Regulation and standardization• At the end of 2001, IEEE launched a working group IEEE802.15.3aIEEE802.15.3a
to define a new physical layer technology for high data rate short range applications – range: ~10’s of meters– based on UWB technology– two proposals remain in the final vote
• DS-UWB– Belkin, Freescale, Motorola, Pulse-LINK, Time Domain, etc.
• Multiband-OFDM– Alereon, Intel, Nokia, Philips, Sony, Staccato Communications, Texas Instruments,
STMicroelectronics, etc.
– IEEE802.15.3a was not able to make a decision and no standard proposal was made (it requires 75% of the votes)
– WiMedia has been selected as a common radio platform for wireless Bluetooth
• As the industry organizations dedicated to productization in both camps, the work of IEEE802.15.3a was withdrawn on Jan 2006 without any standard– markets will select the winning technology!
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu11/26
• IEEE802.15.4a: WPAN Low Rate Alternative PHY– The principle interests are
• providing communications and high precision ranging & location capability (1 meter accuracy and better)
• high aggregate throughput and ultra low power• adding scalability to data rates, longer range, and lower
power consumption and cost– started on 2002 and the work is currently ongoing
• Both UWB related 802.15 study groups defined channel models for UWB research
• Ecma International supports multiband-OFDM approach in its own standard proposal (ECMA-368 standard)– at the moment, it is valid only in the USA
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu12/26
Competing technologies
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu13/26
• Typically, conventional radio systems are (super)heterodyne systems, in which baseband signal is sent using higher frequencies
• Singleband UWB– “Impulse radio”– Baseband signal– Low average transmitted power – Low peak-to-average power ratio (3 dB)– Low or medium data rates
• Time-hopping UWB (TH-UWB)– short pulses– user separation with TDMA– discontinuous transmission
» low duty cycle (ON/OFF ratio)• Direct sequence UWB (DS-UWB)
– short pulses– high duty cycle– radar type approach– user separation with CDMA
Singleband UWB transmitter chipdesigned in CWC (0.35 µm CMOS, area 0.5 mm2).
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu14/26
Competing technologies: singleband
• Pulse waveforms are typically based on– Gaussian pulse set or Hermitean pulse set
– pulse shape and pulse width defines the occupied frequency band
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5Time [ns ]
Diffe re nt Gaus s ian wav e form s
Tp = 0.5 ns123456
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2010
-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
Frequency [GHz]
Pow
er
Spe c tra for Gaus s ian p uls e s
G1G3G5G7
Tp = 0.3 ns
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu15/26
Competing technologies: singleband• Modulation methods:
– pulse position– pulse amplitude– pulse shape– on-off keying– bit position
• M-ary modulation is possible• Perfect for low data rate applications having accurate positioning
requirements.• IEEE802.15.3a standard proposal supports data rates 28, 55,
110, 220, 500, 660 and 1320 Mbps– DS-UWB
• A choice for IEEE802.15.4a standard (low data rate with accurate positioning)– Rd ~10’s to 100’s of kHz
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu16/26
Competing technologies: multiband
• Multiband UWB– Carrier signal– High data rate
• Multiband-OFDM– WLAN type approach– OFDM, like used in IEEE802.11a,
WiMax (IEEE802.16a) and DVB– continuous transmission using 128
sub-carriers per band» B = 528 MHz
– to be used in wireless USB• providing 480 Mbps
– a common radio platform for high speed Bluetooth
UWB pulse generatorby CWC
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu17/26
Competing technologies: multiband
• Multicarrier modulation results in straight forward scheme to manipulate signal spectra
• High data rate applications• Positioning accuracy is poorer than in singleband
approach due to it’s narrower bandwidth• 14 overlapping OFDM channels, each having B = 528 MHz• Industrial standard (Ecma) supports data rates
53.3, 80, 106.7, 160, 200, 320, 400 and 480 Mb/s• Ultimate goal is set to Rd > 1 GHz
Noncoherent singleband UWB transceiver chip designed by CWC
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu18/26
GROUP 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 GROUP 4
Band #1
Band #2
Band #3
Band #4
Band #5
Band #6
Band #7
Band #8
Band #9
Band #10
Band #13
Band #12
Band #11
f 3432 MHz
3960 MHz
4488 MHz
5016 MHz
5544 MHz
6072 MHz
6600 MHz
7128 MHz
7656 MHz
8184 MHz
8712 MHz
9240 MHz
9768 MHz
Band #14
GROUP 5
10296 MHz
Competing technologies: multiband
Group 1 ismandatoryfor all MB-OFDMsystems
128 carriers@ B = 4.125 MHz
Depending on the spectrum regulations, some subcarriers can be suppressed
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu19/26
• FFI: Fixed frequency interleaving• TFI: Time frequency interleaving
• Modulation– QPSK: quaternary phase shift keying
• antipodal• group of 2 bits
– DCM: dual carrier modulation• orthogonal• group of 4 bits mapped to two different 16-point constellation
separated by 50 tones
Guard Interval for TX/RX Switching
Time
Zero Prefix
Period
Information Length
Frequency (MHz)
Time
3168
3696
4224
4752
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu20/26
Competing technologies: minorityalternatives
Other possibilities• Chirp modulation
– using fast frequency chirps– used in (through material) radars
• UWB-FM– low and medium data rates– low modulation index FSK followed by high modulation index
FM– user separation with different sub-carrier frequencies, i.e.,
FDMA• Transmitted reference
– two pulses: one for channel estimation and the other for modulated data
– equivalent performance can be achieved with noncoherent bit position modulation
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu21/26
UWB Applications
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu22/26
Communications•• WirelessWireless--USBUSB•• High speed BluetoothHigh speed Bluetooth• WLANs• Short range communication links• Ad hoc networks• Data & voice & control links
Radar• Ground penetrating radars• Through-wall radars• Imaging and ranging• Buried victim rescue• Landmine detection
Intelligent Sensors• Collision avoidance, proximity
and altitude sensors• Telemetry• Motion detection • RF tags• Fluid level monitoring • Reverse driving and parking aids• Intelligent Airbags• Intelligent Transport System
Others• Geolocation• Wireless door openers• Medical applications
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu23/26
• For high data rates: IEEE802.15.3a– high speed wireless personal area networks– based on two proposals: DS-UWB and MB-OFDM-UWB– no agreement which one will be selected => the work of 15.3a
SG was stopped on Jan 2006 => market will decide the surviving technology
=>Only a global standard would result in great success
• For low data rates: IEEE802.15.4a– communications and high precision ranging/location– standardization process is ongoing
=> Also proprietary solutions are needed
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu24/26
Positioning
• Carrier-less transmission– inexpensive CMOS technology can be used– low data rate
• UWB localizers are suitable for indoor environment where GPS cannot be used
• Large bandwidth of UWB signal -> high resolution
• Relative distances between localizers are defined by measuring propagation times of the pulse sequences (ToA)
• Ad hoc network structure will improve the accuracy – more calculation points
Noncoherent TX/RX chiparea 9 mm2
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu25/26
Summary
WILHO seminar © 2006, Matti Hämäläinen, CWC, Oulu26/26
• UWB is coming but the use is allowed only in the USA at the moment– Bf > 20% or B > 500 MHz– radiation masks for different applications
• Regulatory decisions in Europe and Japan are expected soon – an European proposal has been released
• tighter than the FCC’s radiation mask• Different technologies to generate UWB signal are available• Technology is suitable for different kinds of applications
– low and high data rates– accurate positioning