Rein Willemze Professor of Dermatology Dept. of Dermatology; Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, The Netherlands ERN-EuroBloodNet Cutaneous Lymphomas May 18, 2020 Introduction to Cutaneous Lymphomas
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Diapositiva 1Dept. of Dermatology; Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, The Netherlands ERN-EuroBloodNet Cutaneous Lymphomas May 18, 2020 Introduction to Cutaneous Lymphomas • Mycosis Fungoides: Maarten Vermeer • CD30+lymphoproliferations: Werner Kempf • Indolent CBCL (PCFCL and PCMZL): Pablo Ortiz & Emmanuella Guenova • Aggressive CBCL (PCDLBCL-LT): Marie Beylot Barry & Anne Pham-Ledard • New therapeutic developments I: Julia Scarisbrick • New therapeutic developments II: Rudolf Stadler Cutaneous Lymphoma Webinars To be discussed Why are cutaneous lymphomas special (different from nodal NHL) ? History of cutaneous lymphoma classification • dictates the type of treatment • provides information on clinical course and prognosis. • incorrect classification → incorrect treatment 1806 Mycosis fungoides (MF) 1938 Sézary syndrome proposed as an encompassing term for above conditions. described by Alibert (1806) Edelson R. J Am Acad Dermatol 1980;2:89-106 History of cutaneous lymphoma classification: 1990 6 - classified by pathologist with schemes used for nodal lymphomas and based on morphology (histologic classification: secondary cutaneous lymphomas. lymphomas with secondary skin 7 - classified by pathologist with schemes used for nodal lymphomas and based on morphology (histologic classification: secondary cutaneous lymphomas. lymphomas with secondary skin Primary ≠ secondary cutaneous lymphomas. (histologic diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis). clinicopathologic correlation essential. Histology: CBCL, centroblastic = diagnosis Therapy: multi-agent chemotherapy (consistent with centroblastic lymphoma) → CR Follow-up: died of lymphoma 32 months after diagnosis. Centroblastic lymphoma Histology: CBCL, centroblastic = diagnosis Follow-up: sustained CR (168 months). Centroblastic lymphoma presenting with only skin lesions Follicular: <5% follicular and diffuse and diffuse growth pattern Histologic growth pattern of PCFCL Primary cutaneous ≠ nodal centroblastic lymphoma • Solitary or localized lesions on trunk or face/scalp (85%) • Therapy: radiotherapy • Extracutaneous dissemination uncommon (<10%) • Distinct clinicopathologic entity (derived from follicle center (germinal center) B-cells: primary cutaneous follicle center cell lymphoma before radiotherapy after radiotherapy Willemze R. et al, Am J Pathol 1987;126:325-333; Berti E. et al; J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19:259-272 Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma (PCL): • No evidence of extracutaneous disease at time diagnosis as assessed by appropriate staging procedures. Secondary CL (skin localizations of NHL) • NHL with both cutaneous and extracutaneous localizations at diagnosis • Skin localizations in a patient with a history of a systemic NHL Primary vs secondary cutaneous lymphomas Primary cutaneous immunocytoma (PCMZL) (5-yr-survival: 99%) Low grade (B-cell) • Small lymphocytic (B-CLL) Low grade (T-cell) = small cell • Small lymphocytic (T-CLL) • Small cerebriform (MF/SS) • Lennert’s lymphoma • Pleomorphic medium/large 18 Beljaards RC. Et al; Am J Pathol. 1989;135:1169-78. PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement • Distinctive clinical features (disease entities) • Other clinical behaviour and prognosis → different type of treatment. • Other biologic features (e.g. genetic pathways; translocations; adhesion molecules) → different pathogenesis. • PCL should be included as separate entities in malignant lymphoma classifications (to prevent unnecessarily aggressive therapies). PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible: • Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification. • Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology → classification on the basis of histology alone impossible. • Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis → clinicopathologic correlation essential Centroblastic lymphoma presenting with only skin lesions Localized skin lesions on trunk (back) or scalp (>80%) Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma Preferential localization on arms and upper trunk (65%) Primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type Preferential localization on leg(s) in elderly patients (>80%) Early stage mycosis fungoides Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides Petrella T. et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1887-9 PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible: • Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification. • Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology → classification on the basis of histology alone impossible. • Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis → clinicopathologic correlation essential Epidermotropic atypical infiltrate: MF? dermatologists pathologists mycosis fungoides pagetoid reticulosis LyP, type D aggressive CD8+ CTCL CD3 CD30 DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate Examination: nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months. Histology: (C-)ALCL = diagnosis ? Skin infiltrates with clusters of CD30+ cells: • Cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) • Lymphomatoid papulosis (type C) • Skin localizations of Hodgkin lymphoma. • MTX-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate Examination: nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months. Histology: (C-)ALCL = diagnosis ? ? Therapy: ? Man, 74 yrs. Nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months. Diagnosis: transformed MF (CD30+) CD3 CD30 CD3 DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate Examination: nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months. Histology: Diffuse CD30+ dermal infiltrate; DD: (C-)ALCL; transformed MF Staging: no extracutaneous disease Therapy: RT (tumor); topical steroids (patches) Follow-up: nodal and pleura lesions 4 years after diagnosis. DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible: • Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification. • Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology → classification on the basis of histology alone impossible. • Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis → clinicopathologic correlation essential PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible: • Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification. • Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology → classification on the basis of histology alone impossible. • Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis → clinicopathologic correlation essential C-ALCL MF LyP PCSM-TCLPD C-ALCL MF LyP PCSM-TCLPD • Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification. • Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology → classification on the basis of histology alone impossible. • Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis → clinicopathologic correlation essential • CTCL is not a diagnosis → Do not use the term without further specification. PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible: • Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification. • Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology → classification on the basis of histology alone impossible. • Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis → clinicopathologic correlation essential • CTCL is not a diagnosis → Do not use the term without further specification. • Therapeutic consequences: importance of skin-directed therapes (topical steroids; topical cytostatics; phototherapy; radiotherapy). New concepts in cutaneous lymphoma classification Primary ≠ secondary cutaneous lymphomas. • Histologic diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis. • Clinicopathologic correlation essential in diagnosis and classification New types of CTCL and CBCL New classifications (EORTC; WHO-EORTC; WHO-EORTC 2018) New types of CTCL and CBCL: 1985 - 1996 1987 primary cutaneous follicle center cell lymphoma 1989 primary cutaneous CD30+ large T-cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) vs 1989 primary cutaneous CD30 - large T-cell lymphoma 1991 primary cutaneous immunocytoma (PCMZL) 1992 spectrum primary cutaneous CD30+ LPD 1993 CD30-negative CTCL (non-MF) [small vs large] 1996 primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma of the leg Should be, but were not included as distinct disease entities in malignant lymphoma classifications to prevent unnecessarily aggressive treatment: → EORTC classification (1997) EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma Cutaneous B-cell Lymphoma Intermediate behaviour • large B-cell lymphoma of the leg Provisional entities • plasmacytoma • intravascular large B-cell lymphoma Willemze R et al: BLOOD 1997;90: 354-371 • First classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas. • Distinction between indolent, intermediate • Clinical relevance validated on more than 1300 patients. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas 2005 Willemze R. et al, Blood 2005; 105: 3768-3785 Classification for primary cutaneous and hematologists Classification DER PA HEM 1988 Updated Kiel classification - (+) + 2005 WHO-EORTC classification + (+) - 2016 WHO classification (revised 4th ed.) + + + 2018 update WHO-EORTC classification + + + Classification DER PA HEM Treatment PCFCL and C-ALCL with RT 2005 WHO-EORTC classification + (+) - - 2016 WHO classification (revised 4th ed.) + + + + 2018 update WHO-EORTC classification + + + + Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas – Folliculotropic MF - Primary cutaneous γ/δ T-cell lymphoma - Aggressive cytotoxic epidermotropic CD8+ CTCL - Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell LPD - Primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma Cutaneous B-cell lymphomas • EBV-positive mucocutaneous ulcer 75% 25% • CTCL (75%) much more common than CBCL (25%) • CTCL is not a diagnosis, but refers to a group of diseases with different treatment and prognosis. phenotypical, genetic and clinical criteria (clinicopathologic entities). • Clinical presentation (localization !!) often is a major diagnostic adjunct. • If the clinician fails to provide the appropriate clinical information, a definite diagnosis can often not be made. Summary approach form the basis of cutaneous lymphoma diagnosis and classification and are a prerequisite for correct management and treatment. • Mycosis Fungoides: Maarten Vermeer • CD30+lymphoproliferations: Werner Kempf • Indolent CBCL (PCFCL and PCMZL): Pablo Ortiz & Emmanuella Guenova • Aggressive CBCL (PCDLBCL-LT): Marie Beylot Barry & Anne Pham-Ledard • New therapeutic developments I: Julia Scarisbrick • New therapeutic developments II: Rudolf Stadler Discussion