Top Banner
Rein Willemze Professor of Dermatology Dept. of Dermatology; Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, The Netherlands ERN-EuroBloodNet Cutaneous Lymphomas May 18, 2020 Introduction to Cutaneous Lymphomas
56

Introduction to Cutaneous Lymphomas

Dec 16, 2022

Download

Documents

Eliana Saavedra
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Diapositiva 1Dept. of Dermatology; Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, The Netherlands
ERN-EuroBloodNet Cutaneous Lymphomas May 18, 2020
Introduction to Cutaneous Lymphomas
• Mycosis Fungoides: Maarten Vermeer
• CD30+lymphoproliferations: Werner Kempf
• Indolent CBCL (PCFCL and PCMZL): Pablo Ortiz & Emmanuella Guenova
• Aggressive CBCL (PCDLBCL-LT): Marie Beylot Barry & Anne Pham-Ledard
• New therapeutic developments I: Julia Scarisbrick
• New therapeutic developments II: Rudolf Stadler
Cutaneous Lymphoma Webinars
To be discussed
Why are cutaneous lymphomas special (different from nodal NHL) ?
History of cutaneous lymphoma classification
• dictates the type of treatment
• provides information on clinical course and prognosis.
• incorrect classification → incorrect treatment
1806 Mycosis fungoides (MF)
1938 Sézary syndrome
proposed as an encompassing term for
above conditions.
described by Alibert (1806)
Edelson R. J Am Acad Dermatol 1980;2:89-106
History of cutaneous lymphoma classification: 1990
6
- classified by pathologist with schemes used
for nodal lymphomas and based on
morphology (histologic classification:
secondary cutaneous lymphomas.
lymphomas with secondary skin
7
- classified by pathologist with schemes used
for nodal lymphomas and based on
morphology (histologic classification:
secondary cutaneous lymphomas.
lymphomas with secondary skin
Primary ≠ secondary cutaneous lymphomas.
(histologic diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis).
clinicopathologic correlation essential.
Histology: CBCL, centroblastic = diagnosis
Therapy: multi-agent chemotherapy (consistent with centroblastic lymphoma) → CR
Follow-up: died of lymphoma 32 months after diagnosis.
Centroblastic lymphoma
Histology: CBCL, centroblastic = diagnosis
Follow-up: sustained CR (168 months).
Centroblastic lymphoma presenting with only skin lesions
Follicular: <5%
follicular and diffuse and diffuse growth pattern
Histologic growth pattern of PCFCL
Primary cutaneous ≠ nodal centroblastic lymphoma
• Solitary or localized lesions on trunk or face/scalp (85%)
• Therapy: radiotherapy
• Extracutaneous dissemination uncommon (<10%)
• Distinct clinicopathologic entity (derived from follicle center (germinal center) B-cells:
primary cutaneous follicle center cell lymphoma
before radiotherapy
after radiotherapy
Willemze R. et al, Am J Pathol 1987;126:325-333; Berti E. et al; J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19:259-272
Primary Cutaneous Lymphoma (PCL):
• No evidence of extracutaneous disease at time diagnosis as
assessed by appropriate staging procedures.
Secondary CL (skin localizations of NHL)
• NHL with both cutaneous and extracutaneous localizations at
diagnosis
• Skin localizations in a patient with a history of a systemic NHL
Primary vs secondary cutaneous lymphomas
Primary cutaneous
immunocytoma (PCMZL)
(5-yr-survival: 99%)
Low grade (B-cell)
• Small lymphocytic (B-CLL)
Low grade (T-cell) = small cell
• Small lymphocytic (T-CLL)
• Small cerebriform (MF/SS)
• Lennert’s lymphoma
• Pleomorphic medium/large
18 Beljaards RC. Et al; Am J Pathol. 1989;135:1169-78.
PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement
• Distinctive clinical features (disease entities)
• Other clinical behaviour and prognosis → different type of treatment.
• Other biologic features (e.g. genetic pathways; translocations;
adhesion molecules) → different pathogenesis.
• PCL should be included as separate entities in malignant lymphoma
classifications (to prevent unnecessarily aggressive therapies).
PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement
Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible:
• Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical
presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification.
• Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology
→ classification on the basis of histology alone impossible.
• Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis →
clinicopathologic correlation essential
Centroblastic lymphoma presenting with only skin lesions
Localized skin lesions on trunk (back) or scalp (>80%)
Primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma
Preferential localization on arms and upper trunk (65%)
Primary cutaneous DLBCL, leg type
Preferential localization on leg(s) in elderly patients (>80%)
Early stage mycosis fungoides
Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides
Petrella T. et al. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1887-9
PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement
Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible:
• Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical
presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification.
• Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology
→ classification on the basis of histology alone impossible.
• Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis →
clinicopathologic correlation essential
Epidermotropic atypical infiltrate: MF?
dermatologists
pathologists
mycosis fungoides pagetoid reticulosis LyP, type D aggressive CD8+ CTCL
CD3 CD30
DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate
Examination: nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months.
Histology: (C-)ALCL = diagnosis ?
Skin infiltrates with clusters of CD30+ cells:
• Cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL)
• Lymphomatoid papulosis (type C)
• Skin localizations of Hodgkin lymphoma.
• MTX-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder
DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate
Examination: nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months.
Histology: (C-)ALCL = diagnosis ? ?
Therapy: ?
Man, 74 yrs. Nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months. Diagnosis: transformed MF (CD30+)
CD3 CD30 CD3
DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate
Examination: nodules and ulcerating tumors on left upper leg for 2 months.
Histology: Diffuse CD30+ dermal infiltrate; DD: (C-)ALCL; transformed MF
Staging: no extracutaneous disease
Therapy: RT (tumor); topical steroids (patches)
Follow-up: nodal and pleura lesions 4 years after diagnosis.
DD. Diffuse CD30-positive skin infiltrate
PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement
Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible:
• Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical
presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification.
• Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology
→ classification on the basis of histology alone impossible.
• Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis →
clinicopathologic correlation essential
PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement
Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible:
• Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical
presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification.
• Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology
→ classification on the basis of histology alone impossible.
• Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis →
clinicopathologic correlation essential
C-ALCL
MF LyP PCSM-TCLPD
C-ALCL
MF LyP PCSM-TCLPD
• Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical
presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification.
• Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology
→ classification on the basis of histology alone impossible.
• Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis →
clinicopathologic correlation essential
• CTCL is not a diagnosis → Do not use the term without further specification.
PCL vs nodal NHL -/+ secondary cutaneous involvement
Primary cutaneous lymphomas are visible and accessible:
• Different types of CTCL and CBCL have a characteristic clinical
presentation that may be helpful in diagnosis and classification.
• Different types of cutaneous lymphoma can show an identical histology
→ classification on the basis of histology alone impossible.
• Histologic diagnosis = differential diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis →
clinicopathologic correlation essential
• CTCL is not a diagnosis → Do not use the term without further specification.
• Therapeutic consequences: importance of skin-directed therapes (topical
steroids; topical cytostatics; phototherapy; radiotherapy).
New concepts in cutaneous lymphoma classification
Primary ≠ secondary cutaneous lymphomas.
• Histologic diagnosis ≠ final diagnosis.
• Clinicopathologic correlation essential in diagnosis and classification
New types of CTCL and CBCL
New classifications (EORTC; WHO-EORTC; WHO-EORTC 2018)
New types of CTCL and CBCL: 1985 - 1996
1987 primary cutaneous follicle center cell lymphoma
1989 primary cutaneous CD30+ large T-cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) vs
1989 primary cutaneous CD30 - large T-cell lymphoma
1991 primary cutaneous immunocytoma (PCMZL)
1992 spectrum primary cutaneous CD30+ LPD
1993 CD30-negative CTCL (non-MF) [small vs large]
1996 primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma of the leg
Should be, but were not included as distinct disease entities in malignant lymphoma
classifications to prevent unnecessarily aggressive treatment: → EORTC classification (1997)
EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma
Cutaneous B-cell Lymphoma
Intermediate behaviour • large B-cell lymphoma of the leg
Provisional entities • plasmacytoma • intravascular large B-cell lymphoma
Willemze R et al: BLOOD 1997;90: 354-371
• First classification for primary cutaneous
lymphomas.
• Distinction between indolent, intermediate
• Clinical relevance validated on more than
1300 patients.
WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas 2005
Willemze R. et al, Blood 2005; 105: 3768-3785
Classification for primary cutaneous
and hematologists
Classification DER PA HEM
1988 Updated Kiel classification - (+) +
2005 WHO-EORTC classification + (+) -
2016 WHO classification (revised 4th ed.) + + +
2018 update WHO-EORTC classification + + +
Classification DER PA HEM Treatment PCFCL and
C-ALCL with RT
2005 WHO-EORTC classification + (+) - -
2016 WHO classification (revised 4th ed.) + + + +
2018 update WHO-EORTC classification + + + +
Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas
– Folliculotropic MF
- Primary cutaneous γ/δ T-cell lymphoma
- Aggressive cytotoxic epidermotropic CD8+ CTCL
- Primary cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell LPD
- Primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma
Cutaneous B-cell lymphomas
• EBV-positive mucocutaneous ulcer
75%
25%
• CTCL (75%) much more common than CBCL (25%)
• CTCL is not a diagnosis, but refers to a group of diseases with different
treatment and prognosis.
phenotypical, genetic and clinical criteria (clinicopathologic entities).
• Clinical presentation (localization !!) often is a major diagnostic adjunct.
• If the clinician fails to provide the appropriate clinical information, a
definite diagnosis can often not be made.
Summary
approach form the basis of cutaneous lymphoma diagnosis
and classification and are a prerequisite for correct
management and treatment.
• Mycosis Fungoides: Maarten Vermeer
• CD30+lymphoproliferations: Werner Kempf
• Indolent CBCL (PCFCL and PCMZL): Pablo Ortiz & Emmanuella Guenova
• Aggressive CBCL (PCDLBCL-LT): Marie Beylot Barry & Anne Pham-Ledard
• New therapeutic developments I: Julia Scarisbrick
• New therapeutic developments II: Rudolf Stadler
Discussion