Future ARFF with CAFS Compressed Air Foam System
FLASH CAFS – construction of admixing chamber
Admixing
chamber
Pressure regulating valve
Inlet
Outlet
Pressure translator
Expansion ratio-controller
Differential pressure gauge
The Institution of Fire Engineers Australia & New Zealand
Compressed Air Foam Systems for ARFF, Wildland and Urban Environments
Time To Knockdown
0:00
0:07
0:14
0:21
0:28
0:36
0:43
0:50
0:57
Extinguishment Medium
Tim
e (
se
c.)
Water
Foam
CAFS
Water: 50 seconds
Foam: 25 seconds
50% better than water
CAFS: 11 seconds
78% better than water
66% better than foam
Liters Required For Knockdown
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Extinguishment Medium
Ga
llo
ns
Water
Foam
CAFS
Water: 292 Lts
Foam: 170 Lts
40% better than water
CAFS: 64 Lts
79% better than water
64% better than foam
Why bother Build stage to engine bay and end user
• Cost 50 K addition to appliance Scania appliance $ 620,000
• CAFS components 15 – 20 K $ Engine builders approx same to fit out
• Engine builder issues
• Union: Industrial relation issues
• More maintenance required
Does it work, to good to be true
• Water works why change
• Traditionalists Water water and more water
Training
• Construct training team extra work load
• More SOP’s
• Where can you train
• Does CAF really work
Public
• Environmental issues concentrates many and varied
Why aren’t more people using
CAFS?
• CAFS is often misunderstood and expectations are beyond capability
• It’s expensive (up to $50,000)
• Change is hard: Water is in fire-fighters’ DNA
• People wonder, “Does it really work?”
• My comment - in regards to ARFF: Awareness, regulations, legislation and tradition?