Top Banner
“Moving Towards Sustainable Local NGOs in South Africa: FHI 360 UGM ExperiencesPresenter: Simon Leballo AIDS 2012 - Turning the Tide Together
5

Introduction & Overview

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

Shiro

“Moving Towards Sustainable Local NGOs in South Africa: FHI 360 UGM Experiences ” Presenter: Simon Leballo. Introduction & Overview. Umbrella Grants Management (UGM) Program Award Period: October 1, 2007 – March 31, 2013 Funding ceiling: USD$91 million Location : South Africa - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Introduction & Overview

“Moving Towards Sustainable Local NGOs

in South Africa: FHI 360 UGM Experiences”

Presenter: Simon Leballo

AIDS 2012 - Turning the Tide Together

Page 2: Introduction & Overview

Introduction & Overview

• Umbrella Grants Management (UGM) Program • Award Period: October 1, 2007 – March 31, 2013• Funding ceiling: USD$91 million• Location: South Africa• Goal: To support the provision of sustainable, high-quality

HIV/AIDS services in South Africa through strategic grants management and CB support to implementing partners.

• Partners: 13 organisations over life of the project (10 SA, 3 international, 8 active in year 5

Page 3: Introduction & Overview

Capacity Building Operating Model:Umbrella Approach

Capacity building approach includes: • Core, Cohort and Customized training • Mentoring and Twinning • Educational Training Fund (ETF)• Technical Assistance, including onsite and virtual support

UGM identifies specific organizational development needs and addresses them with customized action plans in 10 specialized domains.

Page 4: Introduction & Overview

Unique Characteristics of the Umbrella Model • Provision of grant funding allowed stronger financial

compliance which leads to improved financial systems• Annual CB assessments and joint action planning allowed

partners to define areas for improvement and CB priorities• Emphasis on governance and strategic management CB led

to greater Board engagement and strategic planning • Engagement in partner reporting led to significantly

improved MER systems • CB workshops increased partner networking, information

sharing and collaboration

Page 5: Introduction & Overview

Challenges of the Umbrella Model

• Partners had difficulty absorbing and managing PEPFAR funding (UGM had no role in determining partner funding levels )

• Lack of ‘graduation’ criteria led to confusion about the ultimate goal of the CB partnership and when it was reached

• Emphasis on program and financial reporting in alignment with USAID rules led to a reliance on external experts for TA

• Financial mismanagement by a few partners interrupted program implementation and resulted in projects ending prematurely.

• Sustainability of activities and funding post-UGM is challenging