Top Banner
AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013 Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988) 22-35% grade failures (Cho Lieg 2004) social isolation vocational quality of life tinnitus perception in noise
13

Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Byron Casey
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

Introduction

disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational

12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

22-35% grade failures (Cho Lieg 2004)

social isolation vocational quality of life

tinnitus perception in noise

Page 2: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

CI for Single Sided Deafness

“absurd concept historically”

long period of deprivation limited benefit for hearing possible uses for tinnitus

short period of deprivation?

X X X X X

Page 3: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

Effect of Unilateral Stimulation

Page 4: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

Effect of Unilateral Stimulation

Page 5: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

Adult Data

unilateral tinnitus (n=26) (Punte AK, et. al. Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 May;12 Suppl 1:S26-9)

unilateral SNHL all post-lingually deaf better with short periods of deprivation

Page 6: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

Pediatric (and Adult) Data

CI for SSD (n=40) vs. CROS aid BAHA untreated patients

decreased hearing handicap improved localization improved speech in noise (Arndt S, Laszig R, Aschendorff A, et. al., HNO. 2011 May;59(5):437-46)

.

Page 7: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

CI for SSD – Speech perceptionpe

rfor

man

ce

duration of deprivation

100

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >7

From Arndt, Laszig, Aschendorff

Page 8: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

CI for SSD – Speech perceptionpe

rfor

man

ce

duration of deprivation

100

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >7

From Arndt, Laszig, Aschendorff

Page 9: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

Patient Recruitment

inclusion strict minimal deprivation normal anatomy

exclusion anomalous cochlea (narrow nerve!) developmental delay

Page 10: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

Unaided

Aided

Bimodal users in the CI program at SickKids

Page 11: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

Binaural Fusion

Cochlear Implant (CI)

Cochlear Implant (CI)

Electric Electric

Cochlear Implant (CI)

Hearing Aid (HA)

AcousticElectric

Page 12: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

+1000 +400 0 -400 -10000.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Left

Right

Interaural Timing Difference (µs)

Resp

onse

Rat

e

CI +2000 +1000 +400 0 -400 -1000 -2000 -3000 HA0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

CI

HA

Interaural Timing Difference (µs)

Resp

onse

Rat

e

Group N Age at Test

(years)

Hearing/Bimodal Age (years)

Normal Hearing

14 8.6 ± 1.6 8.6 ± 1.6

Bimodal Hearing

4 12.0 ± 1.8 5.0 ± 1.8

(M. Deighton)

CI HA

L R

Page 13: Introduction disruption in unilateral deafness is underestimated (Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):2088-95) educational 12-41% additional needs (Bess 1988)

AAO Instruction Course, Vancouver BC – Sept. 2013

Current Opinion

not expanded criteria

experimental protocols short deprivation careful assessment of bilateral function

vigilant reporting