INTRODUCING FRONTIERS Richard Walker 13 January, 2011
Feb 23, 2016
INTRODUCING FRONTIERS
Richard Walker13 January, 2011
Frontiers• Launched as Frontiers in
Neuroscience (2007)• Large Open Access Publisher
– Science– Medicine– Technology– Society– Culture
• Tiered publishing system– Specialist Journals– Field Journals– Two higher level tiers in development
• The Frontiers Community– 400.000 views/month– >12.000 registered readers
Novel evaluation and review
• Review– Accuracy-based– Independent review– Interactive review– Publication usually within 3 months of submission
• Evaluation– Post-publication by whole community– Used in tiering system
Frontiers interest in SISOB
• Maximizing impact of Frontiers papers• Key role of Frontiers Community (social
network)• What aspects of community maximize
impact?
Frontiers and SISOB
• Contribute to SISOB theoretical framework– Understanding role of social networks in determining impact
• Contribute data– Data on authors, reviewers, readers of Frontiers papers
• Requirements for technology and indicators– Definition of technology and indicators to identify and
analyze relevant social networks• Development of conceptual model (WP2)• Case study on author-reviewer networks (WP8)
Contributions to SISOB WPs
• Coordination– WP2: Conceptual Model– WP9: Peer Review
• Contributions– WP3: Identification and analysis of data
resources– WP4: Measurements and social indicators– WP6: Software platform and tools
WORK PACKAGE 2CONCEPTUAL MODEL
Richard Walker13 January, 2011
WP2: Basic Data
• Start date– January 1, 2011
• End date– December 31, 2011
• Coordinator– Frontiers
• Other Partners– UMA– CICE– UDE– RICY
WP2: Objectives
• Identify key actors, communities and social networks involved in “social appropriation of knowledge”
• Develop hypotheses on impact– <aspect> of <network> -impact
• Operationalize hypotheses in terms of– Data sources– Network indicators– Measurements of impacts
• Identify data sources/indices/representations/tools to verify hypotheses
WP2: methods• Review literature (D2.1: Month 3)
– Review based on template from Frontiers– Theoretical literature on social networks– Empirical Social Network Analysis outside science– Social Network Analysis applied to science– Social Network Analysis applied to specific SISOB themes
• Conceptual model (D2.2 Month 6)– Model based on template from Frontiers– Identify actors, communities and social networks
• Science in general• SISOB cases (take account of data availability)
– Identify impact measures• Science in general• SISOB cases (take account of data availability)
– Formalize hypotheses on relationship between social networks and impact• Science in general• SISOB cases (take account of data availability)
• Detailed specification of data sources, indices, representations and tools (D2.3 Month 12)
Literature survey: methods
• Selection of sources (Google Scholar etc.)• Definition of search terms for each theme• Systematic search• Selection of top ranking review papers• Selection of other top ranking papers• Summary of content
Literature Review – preliminary TOC
• Objectives and structure of this document (Frontiers)• Methodology (Frontiers)• Social Networks and Social Network Analysis
– What is a social network– What is social network analysis– Social network indicators– Tools and technologies
• Empirical applications of Social Network Analysis– <to be completed>
• Social Network Analysis and Science– General– Social Network Analysis and Researcher Mobility– Social Network Analysis and Knowledge Sharing– Social Network Analysis and Author/Reviewer Networks
• Conclusions
Action PointsItem Partner Responsible Deadline
Proposals for changes to TOC All 20/01/2011
Proposals for data sources and search terms All 20/01/2011
Finalization of TOC Frontiers 23/01/2011
Finalization of data sources and search terms Frontiers 27/01/2011
Social networks and Social Network Analysis ?? 28/02/2011
Empirical applications of Social Network Analysis ?? 28/02/2011
Social Network Analysis and Science (general) Frontiers 28/02/2011
Social Network Analysis and Mobility FR 28/02/2011
Social Network Analysis and Knowledge Sharing UDE 28/02/2011
Social Network Analysis and Author/Reviewer Networks Frontiers 28/02/2011
Release of draft 1 deliverable Frontiers 15/03/2011
Collaborative revision and editing All 22/03/2011
Release of deliverable Frontiers 31/03/2011
WORK PACKAGE 9PEER REVIEW
Richard Walker13 January, 2011
WP9: Basic Data• Start date
– January 1, 2011• End date
– December 31, 2013• Coordinator
– Frontiers• Other Partners
– UMA– CICE– MTA KSZI– FR– RICY
WP9: Objectives
• Original– Apply SISOB methods to peer review process
• Extended– Apply SISOB methods to author/reviewer/reader
networks in general– Test hypotheses on impact of specific aspects of
specific networks on specific measurements of impact
WP9: Data resources
• Frontiers– Data on authors and reviewers of all Frontiers paper
(social networks)– Data on readers of all Frontiers papers (impact)
• External– Data on other publications by same
authors/reviewers– References to publications/authors in general media– CV data from same authors/reviewers
WP9: Networks and impact• Social networks (examples)
– Coauthorship networks– Citation networks– Reviewer networks– Reviewer-author networks– Readership networks– Affiliation networks– Terminology networks
• Impact– Number of views – Number of downloads– Reader ratings– Scientific citations– Citations in general media– Geographic, temporal distribution of data
WP9: Deliverables
• D9.1 Specification of model, indicators and representations (Month 8)
• D9.2 Characterization and evaluation of specific author review networks (Month 18)
• D9.3 Characterization of Frontiers extended review system (Month 30)
Note: Final deliverable before end of work package - discuss
Work in months 1-3
• Literature review• Extraction of raw data from Frontiers
databases• Exploratory construction of social networks
and social network indicators (our tools)• Identification of impact indicators• Formulation of initial hypotheses• Formulation of TOC for deliverable
QUESTIONS?
APPENDIX