Intravenous Amiodarone Intravenous Amiodarone for Supraventricular for Supraventricular Tachycardias Tachycardias Jerrold H Levy, MD Jerrold H Levy, MD Emory University School of Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, Georgia Atlanta, Georgia
32
Embed
Intravenous Amiodarone for Supraventricular Tachycardias Jerrold H Levy, MD Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, Georgia.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Intravenous Amiodarone for Intravenous Amiodarone for Supraventricular TachycardiasSupraventricular Tachycardias
Jerrold H Levy, MDJerrold H Levy, MDEmory University School of MedicineEmory University School of Medicine
• Determine the mechanism of the Determine the mechanism of the arrhythmia arrhythmia
• Restore sinus rhythm with the simplest Restore sinus rhythm with the simplest technique and approach as possibletechnique and approach as possible
• Eliminate or significantly reduce Eliminate or significantly reduce arrhythmia recurrences and underlying arrhythmia recurrences and underlying causecause
Singh 2002.
RARA LALA
LVLVRVRV
Types of Supraventricular Types of Supraventricular TachyarrhythmiasTachyarrhythmias
Re-entry in Association with Bypass Tracts:Re-entry in Association with Bypass Tracts:• Re-entry with Anterograde AV Conduction (Orthodromic)Re-entry with Anterograde AV Conduction (Orthodromic)
– With Evidence of Pre-excitation of 12-Lead ECGWith Evidence of Pre-excitation of 12-Lead ECG– Concealed WPW (Bypass Tract ConductingConcealed WPW (Bypass Tract Conducting
Only Retrogradely)Only Retrogradely)
• Re-entry with Anterograde Conduction Over BypassRe-entry with Anterograde Conduction Over BypassTract (Antidromic) During TachycardiaTract (Antidromic) During Tachycardia
Accessory Pathways: Concealed Accessory Pathways: Concealed Bypass Tract AV Reentrant TachycardiaBypass Tract AV Reentrant Tachycardia
AV NodeAV Node
Bundle of HisBundle of His
Left Bundle BranchLeft Bundle Branch
PP
Right Bundle BranchRight Bundle Branch
Concealed BypassConcealed BypassTractTract
Singh 2002.
AV NodeAV Node
Electrical Conduction in Electrical Conduction in Atrial FlutterAtrial Flutter
Ventricular Rate 150-160 (Most Often 2:1 AV Block)Ventricular Rate 150-160 (Most Often 2:1 AV Block)
ECG of FlutterECG of Flutter
Baseline Coarsely or Finely Irregular; P Waves Absent.Baseline Coarsely or Finely Irregular; P Waves Absent.Ventricular Response (QRS) Irregular, Slow or RapidVentricular Response (QRS) Irregular, Slow or Rapid
• Very low incidence of torsades de pointes Very low incidence of torsades de pointes even with diuretic therapyeven with diuretic therapy
Singh 2002.
Unique Features of Amiodarone Unique Features of Amiodarone as an Anti-arrhythmic Drug (Cont’d.)as an Anti-arrhythmic Drug (Cont’d.)
• Has Class 1 properties without the Has Class 1 properties without the associated proarrhythmic actions or associated proarrhythmic actions or negative impact on mortalitynegative impact on mortality
• Has antisympathetic actions withoutHas antisympathetic actions withoutbeta-blocker side effectsbeta-blocker side effects
• Increases LVEF and improves CHFIncreases LVEF and improves CHF
• Antifibrillatory actions in the ventricles may Antifibrillatory actions in the ventricles may be augmented by addition of beta-blockadebe augmented by addition of beta-blockade
Pharmacokinetics of Pharmacokinetics of IV AmiodaroneIV Amiodarone
Summary: More rapid onset and offsetSummary: More rapid onset and offsetof action with IV versus oralof action with IV versus oral
Comparison of Oral vs. IV Amiodarone:Comparison of Oral vs. IV Amiodarone:Conversion of Atrial FibrillationConversion of Atrial Fibrillation
• N=52 patients with atrial fibrillationN=52 patients with atrial fibrillation
– 86 episodes of attempted cardioversion with 86 episodes of attempted cardioversion with oral, intravenous, or DC cardioversionoral, intravenous, or DC cardioversion
• Conversion to sinus rhythm achievedConversion to sinus rhythm achieved
– 29% of pts treated with oral amiodarone29% of pts treated with oral amiodarone
– 42% of pts treated with DC cardioversion42% of pts treated with DC cardioversion
– 64% of pts treated with intravenous 64% of pts treated with intravenous amiodaroneamiodarone
Efficacy of IV Amiodarone for the Efficacy of IV Amiodarone for the Conversion of Atrial arrhythmiaConversion of Atrial arrhythmia
Vietti-RamusVietti-Ramuset al. 1992et al. 1992
44 pts44 pts 86% w/ SVT reverted to SR <24 h86% w/ SVT reverted to SR <24 h100% w/ PSVT reverted to SR <24 h100% w/ PSVT reverted to SR <24 h75% w/ AFL reverted to SR <24 h75% w/ AFL reverted to SR <24 h85.7% w/ AF reverted to SR <24 h85.7% w/ AF reverted to SR <24 h
StrasbergStrasberget al. 1985et al. 1985
26 pts26 pts 100% reverted to SR (100% reverted to SR (PP<0.001)<0.001)46% reverted <30 min46% reverted <30 min23% converted 2-8 h23% converted 2-8 h27% no conversion27% no conversion4% reverted to AFL < 10 min; to SR 40 min later4% reverted to AFL < 10 min; to SR 40 min later
Faniel and Faniel and SchoenfeldSchoenfeld19831983
26 pts26 pts 80.8% reverted to SR <24 h and maintained >48 h80.8% reverted to SR <24 h and maintained >48 hMean time from treatment to SSR = 171 minMean time from treatment to SSR = 171 minTotal dose = 6.9 ± 2.3 mg/kgTotal dose = 6.9 ± 2.3 mg/kg
Management of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in the Management of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in the Critically Ill: a Comparison of Intravenous Critically Ill: a Comparison of Intravenous
Procainamide and AmiodaroneProcainamide and Amiodarone
24 pts atrial fibrillation more than 1 h evaluated – 10 Amiodarone,24 pts atrial fibrillation more than 1 h evaluated – 10 Amiodarone,14 Procainamide 14 Procainamide
Methods:Methods:
• Amiodarone IV 3 mg/kg then 10 mg/kg/24 h with repeat dose of 3 Amiodarone IV 3 mg/kg then 10 mg/kg/24 h with repeat dose of 3 mg/kg at 1 h if no response or Procainamide IV 10 mg/kg at 1 mg/kg at 1 h if no response or Procainamide IV 10 mg/kg at 1 mg/kg/min then 2-4 mg/min for 24 h with repeat dose of 5mg/kg mg/kg/min then 2-4 mg/min for 24 h with repeat dose of 5mg/kg at 1 h if no response at 1 h if no response
Results:Results:
• 7/10 Amiodarone-treated patients, 10/14 Procainamide-treated 7/10 Amiodarone-treated patients, 10/14 Procainamide-treated patients converted to sinus rhythm by 12 hourspatients converted to sinus rhythm by 12 hours
• No significant change in SBP from baselineNo significant change in SBP from baseline
Chapman MJ et al Intensive Care Med 1993;19:48-52.
Amiodarone Versus Propafenone for Conversion Amiodarone Versus Propafenone for Conversion of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a
Randomized, Controlled StudyRandomized, Controlled Study
118 pts with atrial fibrillation lasting more than 3 weeks, 118 pts with atrial fibrillation lasting more than 3 weeks, 34 amiodarone, 32 propafenone, 35 control 34 amiodarone, 32 propafenone, 35 control
Methods:Methods:
• IV amiodarone 300 mg over 1 h, then 20 mg/kg over 24 hours plus 600 IV amiodarone 300 mg over 1 h, then 20 mg/kg over 24 hours plus 600 mg orally, in 3 doses for 1 week, then 400 mg/day orally for 3 weeks. mg orally, in 3 doses for 1 week, then 400 mg/day orally for 3 weeks. IV propafenone 2 mg/kg over 15 minutes, then 10 mg/kg over 24 h IV propafenone 2 mg/kg over 15 minutes, then 10 mg/kg over 24 h and then 450 mg/day orally for 1 month. All patients received digoxin and then 450 mg/day orally for 1 month. All patients received digoxin and anticoagulation and anticoagulation (INR 2-3) (INR 2-3)
Results:Results:
• 16/34 (47.05%) amiodarone-treated patients vs. 13/32 (40.62%) 16/34 (47.05%) amiodarone-treated patients vs. 13/32 (40.62%) propafenone-treated propafenone-treated
• Patients converted to sinus rhythm, P<0.001Patients converted to sinus rhythm, P<0.001
• 1 propafenone-treated patient discontinued treatment because of 1 propafenone-treated patient discontinued treatment because of QRS wideningQRS widening
Kochiadakis GE et al J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;33:966-71.
PIAF TrialPIAF Trial
Rhythm or Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation Rhythm or Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation PPharmacologicalharmacologicalIIntervention in ntervention in AAtrial trial FFibrillation (PIAF): a Randomized Trialibrillation (PIAF): a Randomized Trial
Pts randomized to diltiazem or amiodaronePts randomized to diltiazem or amiodarone
Results:Results:
• 76 pts on diltiazem, 70 on amiodarone reported76 pts on diltiazem, 70 on amiodarone reportedimproved symptoms, improved symptoms, PP=0.317=0.317
• 23% of amiodarone pts returned to sinus rhythm23% of amiodarone pts returned to sinus rhythm
• amiodarone-treated pts did better on 6 min walk test than diltiazemamiodarone-treated pts did better on 6 min walk test than diltiazem
Conclusion: Conclusion: In patients with atrial fibrillation, the therapeutic strategies of rate In patients with atrial fibrillation, the therapeutic strategies of rate versus rhythm control yielded similar clinical results overallversus rhythm control yielded similar clinical results overall
1. Hohnloser et al. Lancet. 2000;356:1789-94.
IV Amiodarone Treatment for Acute Heart IV Amiodarone Treatment for Acute Heart Rate Control in Critically Ill PatientsRate Control in Critically Ill Patients
MethodsMethods
• Retrospective study of 38 ICU patientsRetrospective study of 38 ICU patients
– Pts received IV amiodarone for resistant Pts received IV amiodarone for resistant atrial tachyarrhythmiasatrial tachyarrhythmias
• Onset of rapid heart rate (mean 149 ± 13 Onset of rapid heart rate (mean 149 ± 13 beats/min was associated with decrease in beats/min was associated with decrease in systolic blood pressure of 20 ± 5 mm Hg systolic blood pressure of 20 ± 5 mm Hg ((PP<0.05)<0.05)
Clemo HF, Wood MA, Gilligan DM, Ellenbogen KA. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:594-8.
IV Amiodarone Treatment for Acute Heart IV Amiodarone Treatment for Acute Heart Rate Control in Critically Ill PatientsRate Control in Critically Ill Patients
• Intravenous diltiazem (n=34), esmololIntravenous diltiazem (n=34), esmolol(n=4), and digoxin (n=24) had no effect,(n=4), and digoxin (n=24) had no effect,while reducing systolic blood pressurewhile reducing systolic blood pressureof 6 ± 4 mm Hg (of 6 ± 4 mm Hg (PP<0.05)<0.05)
• Infusion of amiodarone (242 ± 137 mgInfusion of amiodarone (242 ± 137 mgover 1 hr decreased heart rate by 37 ± 8 over 1 hr decreased heart rate by 37 ± 8 beats/min and increased systolic blood pressure beats/min and increased systolic blood pressure by 24 ± 6 mm Hg (by 24 ± 6 mm Hg (PP<0.05)<0.05)
• Complex PK/PD with extremely longComplex PK/PD with extremely longhalf lifehalf life
• Different efficacy rates with studies dueDifferent efficacy rates with studies dueto dosing issues, and different patient to dosing issues, and different patient populationspopulations
Amiodarone IV for Atrial Amiodarone IV for Atrial Arrhythymias: SummaryArrhythymias: Summary
• Effective in SVT, but best studied in AFEffective in SVT, but best studied in AF
• Acute IV therapy is different than Acute IV therapy is different than chronic oral administration: dosing and chronic oral administration: dosing and PK needsPK needsto be considered to be considered
• In critically ill patients, IV therapyIn critically ill patients, IV therapyis requiredis required