Top Banner
Political Socialization Integration Activity 5 Team Awesome Jaymee Clark Julia Carr Nicole Hoxie Robin Walker
28
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Intigration activity 5

Political SocializationIntegration Activity 5

Team Awesome

Jaymee Clark

Julia Carr

Nicole Hoxie

Robin Walker

Page 2: Intigration activity 5

Jaymee Clark

In favor of “Repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”Military influence

Page 3: Intigration activity 5
Page 4: Intigration activity 5
Page 5: Intigration activity 5
Page 6: Intigration activity 5
Page 7: Intigration activity 5
Page 8: Intigration activity 5
Page 9: Intigration activity 5

Julia Carr

In favor of the transition to clean affordable energy.

Page 10: Intigration activity 5

FAMILY!

Page 11: Intigration activity 5

Let’s go vote kids!

Page 12: Intigration activity 5
Page 13: Intigration activity 5
Page 14: Intigration activity 5
Page 15: Intigration activity 5
Page 16: Intigration activity 5

Nicole Hoxie

In favor of lowered health care costMedia Influence

Page 17: Intigration activity 5
Page 18: Intigration activity 5
Page 19: Intigration activity 5
Page 20: Intigration activity 5
Page 21: Intigration activity 5
Page 22: Intigration activity 5
Page 23: Intigration activity 5

Robin Walker

In Favor of a Woman’s Right to Choose

Page 25: Intigration activity 5

Roe vs. Wade

Roe v. Wade (1973), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. The Court held that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests for regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting the mother's health. Noting that these state interests become stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the mother's current trimester of pregnancy:

• In the first trimester, the state's two interests in regulating abortions are at their weakest, and so the state cannot restrict a woman's right to an abortion in any way.

• In the second trimester, there is an increase in the risks that an abortion poses to maternal health, and so the state may regulate the abortion procedure only "in ways that are reasonably related to maternal health" (defined in the companion case of Doe v. Bolton).

• In the third trimester, there is an increase in viability rates and a corresponding greater state interest in prenatal life, and so the state can choose to restrict or proscribe abortion as it sees fit ("except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother").