Interview Schedule Eastern Summit County Planning Commission Wednesday, October 11, 2017 Executive Conference Room, Coalville Courthouse 1 vacancy; 3 applicants 12:20 PM Amy Rydalch 12:35 PM Gale Pace 12:50 PM Marion Wheaton Phone Interview 435‐783‐6254 The vacancy is a result of Sean Wharton’s resignation on 9/7/17.
227
Embed
Interview Schedule Eastern Summit County Planning Commission … · Eastern Summit County Planning Commission Wednesday, October 11, 2017 ... o Ski Utah Magazine o Outside Magazine
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Interview Schedule
Eastern Summit County Planning Commission
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Executive Conference Room, Coalville Courthouse
1 vacancy; 3 applicants
12:20 PM Amy Rydalch
12:35 PM Gale Pace
12:50 PM Marion Wheaton Phone Interview 435‐783‐6254
The vacancy is a result of Sean Wharton’s resignation on 9/7/17.
Interview Schedule
Peoa Recreation Special Service District
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
Executive Conference Room, Coalville Courthouse
(3 vacancies; 3 applicants)
1:05 PM Bailey Stembridge
1:20 PM Thayne Stembridge, reapplying
1:35 PM David Blazzard, reapplying
Vacancies are a result of Jonelle Fitzgerald, Thayne Stembridge and David Blazzard’s terms
expiring 8/31/17. Thayne and David have reapplied; Jonelle is term limited.
asingleton
Text Box
"Buffalo and calf" by Adrianna Allegretti 2017 Council Art Award
asingleton
Text Box
"Refugee walking" by Melanie Nussbaum 2017 Council Art Award-Youth
Has award‐winning dining 3.77 4.17 4.00 3.81 3.51 3.63
Has a vibrant nightlife 3.57 3.97 3.79 3.68 3.43 3.49
Is a family‐friendly destination 4.02 3.83 3.84 3.85 3.80 3.83
Has a welcoming and laid‐back personality 3.93 3.65 3.74 3.85 3.86 3.87
Is easy to get to 3.89 3.72 3.73 3.36 3.51 3.62
Is easy to get around in 3.92 3.92 3.87 3.79 3.73 3.81
Offers everything you need for the perfect winter vacation
3.98 4.14 4.08 4.00 3.64 3.86
Has very consistent snow quality/conditions 4.02 4.14 4.07 3.92 3.79 4.00
Above average across competitors
Average across competitors
Below average across competitors
COMPETITIVELANDSCAPE
1
STAFF REPORT
TO: Summit County Council FROM: Matt Leavitt – Summit County Financial Officer DATE: October 9, 2017 SUBJECT: Initial presentation of Manager’s 2018 budget recommendations
BACKGROUND: At the June 2017 management team meeting department heads and elected officials were presented with direction from the County Manager regarding the preparation of departmental budget requests for 2018. Departments were provided budget packets in July with a deadline for requests of July 25th. Departments were instructed to request what was needed to provide programs and services for their respective departments. At that time, no direction or supposition was made regarding anticipated property tax increases, but were instructed to scrutinize fee schedules and submit budget requests with any adjustments to department related revenues. The Budget Committee met beginning August 1st with the County Manager to receive direction regarding county‐wide budget priorities and discuss updates regarding potential increases in property tax revenues. The direction provided by the County Manager was:
a) Budget Committee’s recommendations should be based on an estimated 15% increase in property tax revenues in the general and municipal services funds;
b) Recommendations should be directed towards a net zero increase in non‐wage items; c) No new employees unless there were offsetting resources;
a. The Budget Committee further recommended that there needs to be a clear indication that those resources are verifiable and reliable for a time sensitive position and less sensitive to economic fluctuations before recommending a full‐ or part‐time position.
d) The only facility project is the completion of the fairgrounds (Phase I, total cost of $5.0 million, with a contingency of $75 thousand if there are extreme winter condition costs).
The Budget Committee met with each department to review submitted requests before beginning a thorough review in order to make recommendations that encompassed the needs of the County as a whole in addition to addressing the strategic objectives of the County Council. Recognizing the limited resources provided even with an estimated 15% increase in property tax revenues, the Committee recommended to the County Manager an operating budget that is nearly $3.8 million below what was requested – or below what departments estimate that they need to provide programs at expected service levels. On September 15th the Committee submitted the recommended operating budget to the County Manager. The Committee’s recommendation fell within the direction provided by the Manager
2
discussed above. The recommended budget included a $51.4 million operating budget, or an increase of 5.57 percent. In October the Manager met with departments that had issues with the Committee recommendations. The appeals were directed at addressing areas where programs or service levels would be significantly impacted by a recommended reduction. The Manager’s recommended budget reflects adjustments to address those needs in addition to addressing issues that may have developed since departments submitted requests in July. MANAGER’S RECOMMENDED 2018 BUDGET: Operating Revenues The Manager has met with several employee and citizen groups, the Utah Taxpayers Association, as well as other community leaders. The County Council has held and plans to continue to hold joint meetings with local municipalities to discuss the County’s proposal to increase property tax revenues to the general and municipal service funds. As a result of these discussions as well as taking into consideration departmental needs, the Manager feels that it is necessary to recommend increasing property tax revenues $4.1 million in those funds ($3.0 million for general and $1.1 million for municipal services funds). Total tax revenues recommended increase is 14.74%. Other significant changes in revenue include:
License and permit revenues are estimated to increase 3.94%. This is primarily due to increased business license revenues.
Intergovernmental revenues are estimated to increase 17.8% primarily due to increased revenues from dispatch reimbursement. The increase in revenues is anticipated to offset the corresponding increase in departmental expenses incurred as a result of combining Summit County and Park City dispatch centers.
Revenues from fees are anticipated to increase 12.6% over 2017 budgeted amounts. Current estimates for 2018 reflect closely the actual amounts received in 2016. However, certain departments are still evaluating fee schedules and these estimates are subject to change before the Council adopts the budget in addition to a proposed fee schedule in December.
Revenues from fines are expected to decrease about 3.4%. The County is receiving less revenue from justice court fines.
Miscellaneous revenues are expected to increase 25.1% due primarily from expected interest revenues and revenues from space rented to the district courts at the Justice Center Complex.
Total operating revenues are anticipated to increase 9.5%, primarily due to the recommended increase in property tax revenues.
3
Operating Expenses (page numbers refer to accompanying budget document)
General Government (p. 10) expenses are recommended to increase 2.1%. The Manager’s recommended budget has increased the Sustainability division (p. 15) $17.5 thousand in order to explore energy efficiencies in County‐owned facilities as a joint project with a private party partnership. Significant changes in the recommended budget include increases to Economic Development (p. 16). The Manager recommends moving forward with an analysis and feasibility study of property acquired in 2017. The primary purpose is to address workforce housing issues within the County. In addition to this analysis and feasibility study, supervision of the workforce housing program has been moved under Economic Development as a concentrated effort. Public Safety (p. 42) expenses are recommended to increase due to increases in the Communications division (p. 61). In order to increase efficiencies and due to changes in funding for public‐safety answering points (PSAP) at the State level, the County and Park City Municipal have combined PSAPs. As discussed in the revenue section above, the County anticipates receiving increased revenues to offset the increased costs of combining PSAPs. Total Public Safety budgets are recommended to increase $714 thousand, with 69% of the increase being a result of the merger of PSAPs. Public Works (p. 77) expenses in the Roads Departments are recommended to increase $373 thousand, primarily due increased expenses in shop materials. This increase is offset by charges against individual departments for the costs of repairs and maintenance of the County’s vehicle fleet. Waste Collection budget is increased as a result of the current contract with the service provider which allows for a cost increase that is correlated to the Consumer Price Index. It is estimated that the increase will be approximately 2.0% for both the curbside and recycling contracts. Government Services (p. 96) has increased beginning with Risk Management (p. 98). Increased workers compensation claims have nearly tripled the premiums paid since 2011. The Committee and the Manager recommend increasing safety programs to help address the current safety and welfare culture of county employees. Facilities budget recommendations for 2018 increased primarily due to the Kamas Services Building being completed. It is anticipated that a new employee (the only full‐time employee added to the chart of positions) will be required as the size of the new facility will be sufficiently larger to require an increase in staffing levels. With the previous facility the County contracted for cleaning services.
4
Both the Committee and the Manager are recommending reductions in both the County Fair and the Youth Recreation departments. It is recommended that the County Fair be budgeted at an amount comparable to 2016 and contributions to Youth Recreation be reduced 42.8% (a decrease of $15 thousand in each division). Public Health (p. 126) recommended budget is $166 thousand higher than 2017 budget. The Committee and Manager are recommending increases in both Prevention and Mental Health divisions (p. 139, combined increase of $103 thousand) to address the Council’s strategic objective in these areas. These divisions are significantly dependent upon outside parties, both private party partnership and State grants, the County’s contribution being approximately $245 thousand. Other Departments (p. 141) recommended budget is $2.8 million higher than the 2017 budget. The Manager’s recommended budget includes a $1.6 million contribution to fund balances (p. 144). This recommendation is to help restore fund balances that were reduced as a result of using pay as you go financing as a part of constructing the Kamas Services Building in addition to acquiring property in the Jeremy Ranch area (Cline/Dahle). It is estimated that fund balances in the general fund will be below internal thresholds and near State mandated levels. It is anticipated that fund balances in the municipal services fund will also be below internal thresholds. Further discussions regarding anticipated fund balances will be presented to the County Council in future budget discussions. Placeholders are being recommended for both a 2.0% COLA increase as well as offsetting the anticipated increases in health care benefits for employees (p. 145). The combined budget amounts are approximately $1.2 million.
Capital Improvements Budgets (p. 149) This portion of the recommended budget is still under progress. The County is working with partners to balance the needed projects against the available resources as well as exploring long‐term debt solutions. The revenues portion of the capital improvements includes a portion of the increase of property tax revenues in addition to the anticipated transportation sales tax revenues that were voted on in 2016 and implemented in 2017. It is anticipated that half of the sales tax revenues will be used for debt service payments for a bond issued in 2018. Currently it is unknown as to the specific amount of the bonds to be issued, but is expected to be about $25 million. Capital improvement projects are shown on page 150 of the accompanying document. For 2018, the County is recommending nearly $4.4 million in road projects to be funded from current sources which include property tax revenues and transfers from Service Area #1 (mineral lease funds) and corridor preservation funds.
5
Capital facility projects for 2018 include the completion of the County Fairgrounds, Phase I. The estimated total cost of the project is $5.0 million, with an anticipated $3.0 million budgeted for completion of the project in 2018. Financing of the fairgrounds is currently being recommended through Transient Room Tax funds. The Manager is also recommending solar projects for the Kamas Services and Richins Buildings. Additionally, the Manager is recommending energy efficiency upgrades to the Richins Building. These projects are being recommended as a means to achieve the Council’s environmental stewardship objective. Additional facility projects, not considered capital improvement projects, begin on page 104. These projects reflect the costs of maintaining existing facilities, but also include some improvements directed at safety or legal compliance. Projects specific to the transportation sales tax revenues implemented in 2017 are shown at the bottom of page 150 (noted in blue). These projects are designated as either being financed on a pay as you go (PAG) or long‐term debt (Bond). Pages 153‐154 show projects that are anticipated through 2022. Currently no facility projects are being anticipated in this time period. Open Space funds are shown on page 157. With no known projects anticipated for 2018 placeholders have been included to offset any anticipated revenues that may be received during the year. Should projects become available the 2018 budget would need to be amended. The Fleet Lease program budget begins on page 159. The Budget and Fleet Committees and the County Manager are making recommendations that move the County’s vehicle fleet towards the Council’s objective of proper environmental stewardship. Departments are being directed to acquire vehicles that are either hybrid or electric where it is feasible. Special Revenue Funds, including Transient Room, Restaurant, and RAP taxes being on page 167. The Transient Room Tax includes the contribution for fairgrounds construction. Please note that the balances shown on the bottom of page 168 include the budgeted amount for 2017 and the anticipated amount needed to finish the fairgrounds in 2018. The balances do not currently include any potential carryover as a result of not completing the construction project in 2017.
Total operating expenses 44,453,015 46,754,129 48,724,151 53,243,287 9.3%
Actual
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
SUMMIT COUNTYBUDGET YEAR
2018
The following is a compilation of budgets submitted by the various departments inthe County. The budget committee has done a detailed review, they have met withthe departments, the Manager and the County Council. All departments which had aconcern with the budget the committee recommended was given an opportunity to meetwith both the County Manager and the County Council.
Following his page you can see the final results for the year 2016,the approved budgets for 2017, the requested budget by the department,the budget committee's recommendation, the Manager's budget and the approved budget for 2018.The document will now go through the proper process to progress through publichearings to be held on December 6th and 13th, 2017 and will be adopted by the CountyCouncil on or before December 31, 2017.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 1 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
SUMMARY OF OPERATING FUNDS
Consisting of the Summit County general, municipal‐type services, and assessing & collecting funds
Committee does not recommend salary adjustment or filling Sustainability Specialist position. Not recommending Net Zero and Fleet Utilization studies or programs. Manager: Add $17.5 thousand to professional/technical for help from Rocky Mountain Power with energy efficiencies.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 15 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
Enhance the Summit County entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Retain/biuld existing industries in Summit County and provide location assistance to potential new companies.
Enhance the economic development capacities within Summit County.
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
0.40/0.60/0.00 0.40/0.60/0.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
127,103$ 159,720$ TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 311,181$ 151,461$ 236,505$ 346,505$ ‐18.68% 25.66% Percent Change 94.83% 48.07% 116.95%‐89.04% 509.73% Change in non‐wage items 557.58% 275.77% 687.44%
EMSI subscription not recommended if grant from Chamber Bureau is not received, recommend splitting Cline/Dahle study spread over two (2) years. Manager: Increase amounts available for Cline/Dahle study to $135k, move supervision of affordable housing from Planning Dept.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 16 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
AUDITOR:
Accounting services for Summit County/Purchasing Card administration.
Payroll services for Summit County/W‐2/1099/ACA reporting.
Election equipment moved to fleet lease fund. Additional information regarding State's direction with election equipment will be needed to make informed decisions regarding the direction of election process.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 22 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
PUBLIC DEFENDER:
Provide legal defense for indigent individuals.
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
202,255$ 212,450$ TOTAL MOTOR VEHICLE 225,174$ 12,724$ 224,480$ 224,480$ 5.95% 5.04% Percent Change 5.99% 5.66% 5.66%
‐47.90% 68.61% Change in non‐wage items 32.15% 23.58% 23.58%
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 27 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
RECORDER:
Record and maintain property transactions and ownership for taxation.
Provides access to documents, plats and ownership records on County web site.
Fulfills the functions and duties of the County Surveyor.
Committee recommends $25k for P&T‐Survey ONLY if revenues increase and fewer fee waivers are permitted. Increase in P&T‐Survey is to help with monument preservation program to the extent that resources are available.
$‐
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
RECORDER
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 28 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ATTORNEY:
Criminal prosecution in District, Justice, Drug and Juvenile Courts.
Civil legal services and defense for the County and its special service districts.
Victim advocacy services to victims of crime.
Expert witness fees moved to Legal Contingency (under Miscellaneous) if required for trials. Legal Contingency may be accessed by authorization and coordination of County Manager.
$‐
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
ATTORNEY
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 30 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ASSESSOR:
Fair and equitable assessment of all taxable property in the County.
Develop and defend values for each property assessed.
Administer FAA and primary residential exemptions.
Committee does not recommend funding for assessing technician, keep chart of positions the same, just not recommend funding the position for 2018. Manager: Recommends Assessor's proposal of revising chart of positions to eliminate Appraiser/Software Specialist and replacing with Assessing Technician (amended chart of positions in 2017).
$‐
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
ASSESSOR
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 32 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
130.75% 31.75% Change in non‐wage items 272.61% 272.86% 272.86%
92,148$ 60,000$ COMPLIANCE‐SHERIFF 60,000$ ‐$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 76,109$ moved to JRI STATE LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT
Increases in bugdet are only recommended as long as offsetting grant revenues are received. If grant sources are NOT received then programs must be reduced accordingly.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 53 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
$‐
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
CORRECTIONS
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 54 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
Increases in budget are related to the combinination of Park City secondary PSAP and Summit County primary PSAP to achieve efficiencies in emergency response times and reduction in dropped call transfers between PSAPs. Offsetting revenues from Park City are expected in order to offset increases in budget and services provided.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 62 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
E‐911:
Emergency telephone call answering.
Public Safety radio dispatching services.
Call transfer reduction.
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
‐$ ‐$ 4415‐810‐000 REPAY LOAN ‐$ 98,872$ 90,000$ 4415‐910‐000 CLASS B DISTRIBUTION TO SA#3 (90,000)$ 90,000$ 90,000$
773,276$ 1,444,500$ TOTAL CLASS B ROADS 1,400,000$ (44,500)$ 1,490,000$ 1,490,000$ ‐38.32% 86.80% Percent Change ‐3.08% 3.15% 3.15%
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 82 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
COUNTY ROADS:
Road maintenance.
Snow removal services.
General County facility construction and maintenance support.
Recommend moderate increase to salaries/benefits for winter seasonal on‐call staff to help with extreme plowing conditions in order to reduce overtime and increase personnel safety. Correspondingly, overtime reduced to help fund additional staffing and overtime related to County Fair reduced.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 83 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
TRANSPORTATION:
Planning
Grants management
Oversight and management
Programs and projects related to new transportation or transit sales tax initiatives passed in 2016 should be budgeted in correct departments against related resources.
$‐
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
TRANSPORTATION
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 90 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
65.27% 66.99% % of total 70.83% 67.21% 67.20%4.97% 5.10%
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 95 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
GOVERNMENT SERVICES
RISK MANAGEMENT p. 97
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY p. 99
PERSONNEL p. 101
FACILITIES p. 103
COUNTY FAIR p. 114
YOUTH RECREATION p. 117
LIBRARY p. 119
HISTORY p. 121
EXTENSION SERVICES p. 123
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 96 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
RISK MANAGEMENT:
Preventive controls
Investigating claims
Reviewing claims
Committee recognizes the significant increase in Worker's Compensation claims and has asked that the risk manager direct efforts to creating a workplace culture that emphasizes the safety and welfare of county employees. The committee's recommendation is that additional funds be directed towards changing the existing workplace culture.
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
FACILITIES:
Clean, provide upkeep of buildings to maintain a professional and safe working environment.
Process/complete work orders on repairs of County property.
Schedule and reserve public and County requests for conference room reservations, park facilities.
$‐
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
FACILITIES
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 103 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
MAINTENANCE PROJECTS BY AREA:
Coalville Area: Project description Request Recommended Manager1 Door security, signage, remodel entrances to offices 65,000 65,000 65,000 2 New floor in kitchen, NS Seniors and carpet 8,900 8,900 8,900 3 Controls on outside air to server room 2,500 2,500 2,500 4 HVAC equipment analysis 4,400 5 Misc repairs ‐ Library, USU Extension 2,100 6 Update lighting old part of courthouse 6,500 7 EV charging station 7,600 7,600 7,600
12.84 97,000 36,901 84,000 84,000
Kimball Junction Area:1 Seal new parking lot, sidewalk repair 5,400 5,400 5,400 2 Stain front of building and soffit, timbers 5,800 5,800 5,800 3 Sprinkler landscape repair, includes Transit bldg 3,500 3,500 3,500 4 Transit building repairs 2,000 5 Updates to coucil sound and chairs 2,500 6 EV chargin station 7,600 7,600 7,600
2.76 26,800 12,512 22,300 22,300
Kamas Area:1 Kamas ambulance front entrance, carpet train. room 3,500 3,500 3,500 2 Gutter repair SAR building 2,600 2,600 2,600 3 Generator connection for SAR 3,200 3,200 3,200 4 New storage addition for SAR 8,500 5 EV charging 7,600 7,600
0.22 25,400 15,394 9,300 16,900
Public Works Complex:1 Upstairs furnace and A/C 7,500 7,500 7,500 2 Jib crane in welding bay 25,000 3 New gutters on east side and heat tape 2,500 2,500 2,500 4 Car wash improvements 10,000 5 Miscellaneous landfill repairs 3,000 6 Small materials storage bin 25,000
(1.94) 73,000 48,363 10,000 10,000
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 104 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
Justice Complex:1 Carpet, remodel jury bench to ADA standards 13,500 13,500 13,500 2 Dispatch remodel 142,000 3 Fire strobe replacement 4,200 4,200 4,200 4 Roof membrane replacement 25,000 25,000 25,000 5 New storage building 31,500 31,500 31,500 6 Security upgrades, landscape rocks, windows on dispatch 5,500 7 Misc improvements District Court 5,200 8 EV charging stations 7,600
11.59 234,500 19,947 74,200 74,200
Quinn's Health Building:1 Security updates, locks, signs 6,200 6,200 6,200 2 Concrete repairs 2,800 3 Maintenance on timbers in and outside 3,700 3,700 3,700 4 Trees, landscaping, wildlife damage repairs 2,200 5 Misc repairs 1,700 6 EV charging station 7,600 7,600 7,600
(0.08) 24,200 4,936 17,500 17,500
Parks & Grounds:1 Landscaping, sprinkler repair 2,700 2,700 2,700 2 Arena mix, infield watering arenas 6,500 6,500 6,500 3 New fence between trailer park 4,800
(9.95) 14,000 10,626 9,200 9,200
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 105 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
2016‐2017 facilities spatial analysis completed, recommending security and spatial improvements. The County will need to reserve funds to address non‐capitalized improvements and fund certain projects on a pay as you go basis. In order to address larger projects, the County will need to issue long‐term debt in terms of general obligation (GO) debt or revenue bonds. The committee is recommending that the County begin to address security issues as a first priority.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 106 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
COUNTY FAIR:
Educate the public
Include all Summit County residents
Provide a venue to display projects/livestock
The committee recognizes the increased participation in the annual County Fair and also recognizes that with Phase I of fairgrounds improvements being included in the 2017 and 2018 budgets that additional funds may need to be spent to further the success of the County Fair in addition to bringing additional activities to the property. The committee recommends the County evaluate long‐term use of Transient Room Tax funds and their ability to fund County programs such as the County Fair. Bring Travis back for a discussion to reduce back to 2016 levels.
$‐
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
COUNTY FAIR
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 114 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
940$ 1,500$ 4311‐760‐000 EQUIPMENT 1,500$ ‐$ 1,500$ 1,500$ ‐$ ‐$ 4311‐910‐000 TRANSFER TO OTHER FUNDS ‐$ ‐$
419,948$ 441,500$ TOTAL HEALTH ADMINISTRATION 445,428$ 3,928$ 445,428$ 445,428$ 1.78% 5.13% Percent Change 0.89% 0.89% 0.89%
‐12.75% ‐11.82% Change in non‐wage items ‐1.92% ‐1.92% ‐1.92%
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 128 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
GENERAL HEALTH:
Support healthy communities, individuals, and families in the County.
WIC services for low income women, infants, and children.
Assure health prevention services for County citizens.
The committee is supportive of all health department programs in general. However, recognizing the need of federal funding and the uncertainty regardling long‐term federal sources, the committee recommends that as funding sources continue, the committee recommends the corresponding program. If funding sources deminish or go away, the program is no longer recommended.
$‐
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
GENERAL HEALTH
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 129 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
457,517$ 487,540$ TOTAL EARLY INTERVENTION 528,138$ 40,598$ 527,038$ 527,038$ 1.99% 6.56% Percent Change 8.33% 8.10% 8.10%‐4.45% 87.14% Change in non‐wage items 0.07% ‐3.21% ‐3.21%
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 133 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH:
Protect surface & groundwater to ensure clean, safe drinking water.
Ensure the County and business within are compliant with State & Federal laws.
Train & educate the community while consulting & responding to complaints.
The committee supports a time‐limited intern position as long as lab fees increase to cover the incremental cost. Estimates provided by the department indicate that will be the case. The committee is recommending that the fees prove to be sustainable over time before recommending the position be added to the official chart of positions as either part or full time.
$‐
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 134 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
0.00/0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00/0.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
MENTAL HEALTH & PREVENTION:
Serve as the Local Authority for Mental Health & Substance Abuse in the County.
Support mental health and substance abuse components of County initiatives.
Support and expand partnerships.
Committee supports Communities That Care position as long as grant funds continue to be received to support the program.
$‐
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
MENTAL HEALTH PREVENTION
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 138 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
0.00/0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00/0.00 PREVENTION
67,301$ 43,082$ 4321‐310‐000 SA COUNTY CONTRIBUTION 43,274$ 192$ 43,274$ 43,274$ 514,772$ 533,547$ 4321‐320‐000 SA STATE CONTRIBUTION 552,376$ 18,829$ 552,376$ 552,376$ 19,997$ 20,000$ 4321‐340‐000 SA DRUG COURT 20,000$ ‐$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 13,635$ 20,000$ 4321‐370‐000 SA CAP MATCH 20,000$ ‐$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 17,236$ 20,000$ 4321‐380‐000 SA DUI 25,140$ 5,140$ 25,140$ 25,140$
46.07% 46.34% % of total 45.66% 44.75% 44.75%‐0.41% ‐0.41%
2,887,469$ 3,103,906$ HEALTH DEPARTMENT GRANTS 3,242,882$ 138,976$ 3,242,882$ 3,242,882$ 431,231$ 386,250$ HEALTH DEPARTMENT FEES 438,900$ 52,650$ 438,900$ 438,900$
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 140 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
OTHER DEPARTMENTS
TELEVISION p. 142
NON‐DEPARTMENTAL p. 143
CONTRIBUTIONS p. 144
MISCELLANEOUS & NON PROFITS p. 145
Committee supports upgrades to translator equipment due to obsolescence. Revenues offset costs of the program and service.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 141 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
Committee recommends a reduction in tuition reimbursement program (50%) and only recommends assistance to primarily bachelor or professional certification programs and less emphasis on post‐graduate programs due to availability of resources. Committee continues to support efforts to develop staff to meet the demands for services. Bank service charges will need to be evaluated due to the cost of offering card services in planning/engineering departments and the dollar amount of those transactions.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 143 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
10,000$ 10,000$ 4960‐607‐000 LEADERSHIP PARK CITY/PCMC 10,000$ ‐$ 8,000$ 8,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐608‐000 WEBER BASIN WATER ‐$
25,000$ 25,000$ 4960‐609‐000 PEACE HOUSE INC 30,060$ 5,060$ 25,000$ 25,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐610‐000 MOUNTAINLAND COMMUNITY HOUSING ‐$
103,609$ ‐$ 4960‐612‐000 PUBLIC ART ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐613‐000 COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐614‐000 PARK CITY PERFORMING ARTS ‐$ ‐$ 5,000$ 4960‐616‐000 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 7,500$ 2,500$ 5,000$ 5,000$
15,000$ 7,500$ 4960‐617‐000 UINTA HEADWATERS RC&D 53,000$ 45,500$ 1,000$ 1,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐618‐000 PARK CITY COMMUNITY OUTREACH ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐619‐000 BUILD GREEN UTAH ‐$
30,000$ 30,000$ 4960‐620‐000 PEOPLE'S HEALTH CLINIC 30,000$ ‐$ 25,000$ 25,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐623‐000 CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER ‐$
5,000$ 5,000$ 4960‐624‐000 NUZZLES & COMPANY 30,000$ 25,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$ 4960‐625‐000 SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY 20,000$ 5,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$
‐$ ‐$ 4960‐626‐000 CORNER STONE OF DEMOCRACY ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐627‐000 CHRISTIAN CENTER ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4960‐628‐000 KPCW RADIO ‐$
35,000$ ‐$ 4960‐629‐000 PANDOLABS 40,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ ‐$ 1,000$ 4960‐631‐000 PARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY (1,000)$ ‐$ 15,000$ 4960‐632‐000 PARK CITY TOTS 20,000$ 5,000$ 15,000$ 15,000$
NO SUMMIT PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION 50,000$ 50,000$ ‐$ SUMMIT COMMUNITY GARDENS 26,450$ 26,450$ ‐$ YOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE 20,000$ 20,000$ ‐$ MOUNTAIN MEDIATION CENTER 10,000$ 10,000$ ‐$ CLUFF HOUSE 473,438$ 473,438$ ‐$ CONNECT PARK CITY 17,488$ 17,488$ 10,000$ 10,000$
38,274$ ‐$ 3800‐100‐000 CONTRIBUTION OTHER FUND COUNTY ‐ ‐$ ‐$ 3800‐200‐000 CONTRIBUTION ‐ OTHER ENTITY 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
640,337$ ‐$ 3860‐000‐000 TRANSFER FROM SA#1 ‐ 757,626$ ‐$ 3861‐000‐000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS ‐ ‐ 3,000,000 3,000,000 514,897$ 8,084,170$ 3870‐000‐000 TRANSFER FROM SURPLUS 925,000 (7,159,170) 925,000 925,000
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
PROPOSED 2018 BUDGET:
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS:
Roads: Estimated Other Funding CountyPriority Project Project Cost Sources Portion
41‐4417 1 Highland Estate 592,000 592,000 100.00%41‐4417 2 Canyons (PW Village & Red Pine) 140,400 140,400 100.00%41‐4417 3 Pinebrook 394,000 394,000 100.00%41‐4417 4 Silver Creek 352,500 352,500 100.00%41‐4417 5 Summit Park (Matterhorn Terrace) 750,000 250,000 500,000 66.67%41‐4417 6 Hoytsville (West Hoytsville) 42,000 42,000 100.00%41‐4417 7 Silver Creek 1,925,000 1,225,000 700,000 36.36%41‐4417 8 Francis (Hallam Road) 200,000 200,000 ‐ 0.00%
4,395,900 1,675,000 2,720,900 61.90%
Facilities: Estimated Other Funding CountyPriority Project Project Cost Sources Portion
1 Completion of fairgrounds Phase I 3,000,000 3,000,000 ‐ from TRT Tax2 Facility solar, energy efficiency projects 265,000 111,720 153,280 EBSCO Solar Libraries;
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
757,626$ 57,549$ 4461‐350‐900 CONSTRUCTION/FAIR GROUNDS (57,549)$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 745,000$ ‐$ 4710‐100‐000 2009 SALES TAX BOND PRINCIPAL ‐$ 263,044$ ‐$ 4711‐100‐000 BOND INTEREST COSTS ‐$
‐$ ‐$ 4720‐000‐000 BOND COSTS ‐$ 2,500$ ‐$ 4720‐100‐000 2009 SALES TAX BOND FEES ‐$
145,609$ ‐$ 4800‐100‐000 CONTRIBUTION OTHER FUND COUNTY ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4820‐100‐000 SMALL CITIES GRANT PROGRAM 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 4820‐200‐000 PC INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 4820‐620‐000 OTHER FUNDS TRANSFER/GEN MUNIC ‐$
689$ ‐$ 3610‐300‐000 PLAN/CONSENT AGREE INTEREST ‐$ 16,352$ ‐$ 3610‐400‐000 BUILDING/AFFORD HOUSE INTEREST ‐$ 1,785$ ‐$ 3610‐500‐000 OPEN SPACE MTNC INTEREST ‐$
‐$ ‐$ 3640‐000‐000 SALE OF CAPITAL ASSET ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 3692‐000‐000 MISCELLANEOUS ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 3800‐000‐000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 3812‐000‐000 CONTRIB FROM COMPONENT UNIT ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 3813‐000‐000 OPENSPACE MAINTENANCE ‐$ ‐$ 4,669,000$ 3900‐000‐000 TRANSFER FROM SURPLUS 234,000$ (4,435,000)$ 234,000$ 234,000$
170,000$ 150,000$ 3433‐000‐000 SERVICE AREA #6 150,000$ ‐$ 150,000$ 150,000$
In order to progress towards achieving County Council objectives of proper environmental stewardship, the budget committee and Manager recommend vehicles that help achieve that goal. Vehicle purchases will be directed to that end.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 159 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
355,354$ ‐$ 3900‐100‐000 COUNTY DENTAL 360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 360,000$ 3,800,113$ 3,339,000$ 3900‐200‐000 COUNTY HEALTH 3,340,000$ 1,000$ 3,340,000$ 3,340,000$ 371,321$ 307,400$ 3900‐300‐000 MOUNTAIN REGIONAL WATER 320,000$ 12,600$ 320,000$ 320,000$ 182,392$ 180,200$ 3900‐400‐000 BASIN RECREATION 185,000$ 4,800$ 185,000$ 185,000$
1,072,488$ 927,500$ 3900‐500‐000 PARK CITY FIRE 975,000$ 47,500$ 975,000$ 975,000$ ‐$ 225,000$ 3950‐100‐000 COUNTY GENERAL LIABILITY (225,000)$ ‐$ 280,000$ 3950‐200‐000 COUNTY WORKERS COMP (280,000)$ ‐$ ‐$ 3950‐300‐000 COUNTY AUTO/PROPERTY ‐$ ‐$ 20,000$ 3950‐400‐000 COUNTY UNEMPLOYMENT (20,000)$
142,712$ ‐$ 4440‐500‐100 PARK CITY FIRE ADMIN FEES 120,000$ 120,000$ 120,000$ 120,000$ 762,435$ 927,500$ 4440‐500‐200 PARK CITY FIRE CLAIMS 730,000$ (197,500)$ 730,000$ 730,000$
‐$ 225,000$ 4440‐600‐000 COUNTY GENERAL LIABILITY (225,000)$ ‐$ 280,000$ 4440‐700‐000 COUNTY WORKERS COMP (280,000)$ ‐$ ‐$ 4440‐800‐000 COUNTY AUTO/PROPERTY ‐$ ‐$ 20,000$ 4440‐900‐000 COUNTY UNEMPLOYMENT (20,000)$ ‐$ ‐$ 4800‐100‐000 TRANSFER TO FUND RESERVES ‐$
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
EXPENSES
‐$ ‐$ 4510‐200‐000 MOUNTAINLANDS ‐$ 7,799,312$ 6,660,000$ 4510‐300‐000 PARK CITY CHAMBER 8,826,380$ 2,166,380$ 8,826,380$ 8,826,380$
‐$ ‐$ 4510‐400‐000 TRANSIT DISTRICT ‐$ 98,396$ 587,800$ 4510‐500‐000 COUNTY SPONSORED PROJECTS 500,000$ (87,800)$ 500,000$ 500,000$
‐$ ‐$ 4510‐620‐000 RECORD BOND DISPERSEMENTS ‐$ 53,000$ 53,000$ 4710‐000‐000 TRT BOND PRINCIPAL 56,000$ 3,000$ 56,000$ 56,000$ 35,627$ 37,000$ 4711‐000‐000 TRT BOND INTEREST 35,000$ (2,000)$ 35,000$ 35,000$ 1,700$ ‐$ 4720‐100‐000 BOND FEES ‐$
599,565$ 667,400$ 4821‐000‐000 TRANSFER TO RECREATION FUND 821,308$ 153,908$ 757,150$ 681,400$ 757,626$ 5,000,000$ 4822‐000‐000 TRANSFER/ FAIR GROUND CONST (5,000,000)$ 3,000,000$ 3,000,000$
Prof & Tech ‐ recommend Blyncsy ($45k); Remix planning ($7k); LRTP ($7.5k); wayfinding ($25k); TDM/commuting incentives ($10k). Agreement with Park City Municipal that they receive 1/2 of Additional Mass Transit sales tax revenues.
10/6/2017 ‐ 1:41 PM 178 of 190
County Manager Recommendation of Summit County Budgets
ACTUAL BUDGET ACCOUNT ACCOUNT REQUESTED REQUESTED COMMITTEE MANAGER2016 2017 # NAME 2018 CHANGE RECOMMENDED 2018
2017 BOE AdjustmentsAccount # Serial # New Market Value Old Market Value MV Difference New Taxable Value Old Taxable Value Taxable Difference
County Tax Dollar Difference Old Tax Estimate % Difference Explanation for adjustment
0290480 MSTE-9 2,391,463.00$ 2,391,463.00$ -$ 1,431,674.00$ 2,391,463.00$ (959,789.00)$ (1,144.07)$ 18,701.24$ -40.13% Change to primary residence0106868 HL-10 86,710.00$ 86,710.00$ -$ 47,690.00$ 86,710.00$ (39,020.00)$ (46.51)$ 688.82$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0445879 RSLC-C-3 130,000.00$ 130,000.00$ -$ 130,000.00$ 130,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,016.60$ 0.00% No Change0270169 PP-62-1-A 7,560,000.00$ 9,434,000.00$ (1,874,000.00)$ 7,560,000.00$ 9,434,000.00$ (1,874,000.00)$ (2,233.81)$ 68,321.03$ -19.86% Value Adjusted By using Actual Income on Property0146401 SS-145-N 653,091.00$ 653,091.00$ -$ 386,200.00$ 653,091.00$ (266,891.00)$ (318.13)$ 5,074.52$ -40.87% Change to primary residence0381677 CCRK-K-20 270,000.00$ 270,000.00$ -$ 148,500.00$ 270,000.00$ (121,500.00)$ (144.83)$ 1,955.34$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0342778 CSLC-CC-1-AM 2,979,000.00$ 2,979,000.00$ -$ 2,979,000.00$ 2,979,000.00$ -$ -$ 23,295.78$ 0.00% No Change0342786 CSLC-CC-2-AM 175,000.00$ 175,000.00$ -$ 175,000.00$ 175,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,368.50$ 0.00% No Change0342794 CSLC-CC-3-AM 584,000.00$ 584,000.00$ -$ 584,000.00$ 584,000.00$ -$ -$ 4,566.88$ 0.00% No Change0342802 CSLC-CC-4-AM 189,000.00$ 189,000.00$ -$ 189,000.00$ 189,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,477.98$ 0.00% No Change0342810 CSLC-CC-5-AM 453,000.00$ 453,000.00$ -$ 453,000.00$ 453,000.00$ -$ -$ 3,542.46$ 0.00% No Change0342828 CSLC-CC-6-AM 164,000.00$ 164,000.00$ -$ 164,000.00$ 164,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,282.48$ 0.00% No Change0363402 CSLC-CC-8-AM 62,000.00$ 62,000.00$ -$ 62,000.00$ 62,000.00$ -$ -$ 570.86$ 0.00% No Change0342877 CSLC-CC-12-AM 167,000.00$ 167,000.00$ -$ 167,000.00$ 167,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,305.94$ 0.00% No Change0342885 CSLC-CC-13-AM 149,000.00$ 149,000.00$ -$ 149,000.00$ 149,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,165.18$ 0.00% No Change0342893 CSLC-CC-14-AM 589,000.00$ 589,000.00$ -$ 589,000.00$ 589,000.00$ -$ -$ 4,605.98$ 0.00% No Change0342901 CSLC-CC-15-AM 66,000.00$ 66,000.00$ -$ 66,000.00$ 66,000.00$ -$ -$ 516.12$ 0.00% No Change0342935 CSLC-CC-19-AM 114,000.00$ 114,000.00$ -$ 114,000.00$ 114,000.00$ -$ -$ 891.48$ 0.00% No Change0342943 CSLC-CC-20-AM 114,000.00$ 114,000.00$ -$ 114,000.00$ 114,000.00$ -$ -$ 891.48$ 0.00% No Change0343024 CSLC-PC-1-AM 9,686.00$ 22,000.00$ (12,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 22,000.00$ (12,314.00)$ (14.68)$ 172.04$ -55.97% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343032 CSLC-PC-2-AM 9,686.00$ 22,000.00$ (12,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 22,000.00$ (12,314.00)$ (14.68)$ 172.04$ -55.97% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343065 CSLC-PC-5-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343073 CSLC-PC-6-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343081 CSLC-PC-7-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343099 CSLC-PC-8-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343115 CSLC-PC-10-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343123 CSLC-PC-11-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343131 CSLC-PC-12-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343149 CSLC-PC-13-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343156 CSLC-PC-14-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343164 CSLC-PC-15-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343206 CSLC-PC-19-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343214 CSLC-PC-20-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343222 CSLC-PC-21-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343230 CSLC-PC-22-AM 9,686.00$ 22,000.00$ (12,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 22,000.00$ (12,314.00)$ (14.68)$ 172.04$ -55.97% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343271 CSLC-PC-26-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343263 CSLC-PC-25-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343289 CSLC-PC-27-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343297 CSLC-PC-28-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343305 CSLC-PC-29-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343313 CSLC-PC-30-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343321 CSLC-PC-31-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343339 CSLC-PC-32-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343347 CSLC-PC-33-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343354 CSLC-PC-34-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343362 CSLC-PC-35-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343370 CSLC-PC-36-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343388 CSLC-PC-37-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343396 CSLC-PC-38-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343404 CSLC-PC-39-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0343412 CSLC-PC-40-AM 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ 9,686.00$ 14,000.00$ (4,314.00)$ (5.14)$ 109.48$ -30.81% Reduce Value for Parking Spaces0342950 CSLC-SC-1-AM 131,000.00$ 131,000.00$ -$ 131,000.00$ 131,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,024.42$ 0.00% No Change0342976 CSLC-SC-3-AM 16,000.00$ 16,000.00$ -$ 16,000.00$ 16,000.00$ -$ -$ 125.12$ 0.00% No Change0342984 CSLC-SC-4-AM 131,000.00$ 131,000.00$ -$ 131,000.00$ 131,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,024.42$ 0.00% No Change0342992 CSLC-SC-5-AM 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ -$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ -$ -$ 140.76$ 0.00% No Change0343008 CSLC-SC-6-AM 131,000.00$ 131,000.00$ -$ 131,000.00$ 131,000.00$ -$ -$ 1,024.42$ 0.00% No Change0343016 CSLC-SC-7-AM 23,000.00$ 23,000.00$ -$ 23,000.00$ 23,000.00$ -$ -$ 179.86$ 0.00% No Change0135115 HC-1-71 492,051.00$ 492,051.00$ -$ 270,628.00$ 492,051.00$ (221,423.00)$ (263.94)$ 3,799.44$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0061816 PB-2-I-67 1,106,359.00$ 1,106,359.00$ -$ 608,497.00$ 1,106,359.00$ (497,862.00)$ (593.45)$ 8,497.94$ -45.00% Change to primary residence0302475 BHS-B-13 610,670.00$ 649,291.00$ (38,621.00)$ 335,868.00$ 357,110.00$ (21,242.00)$ (25.32)$ 2,742.96$ -5.95% Adjust Value to reflect Partial complete No CO 0372064 GWLD-22 4,160,074.00$ 4,160,074.00$ -$ 2,317,741.00$ 2,317,741.00$ -$ -$ 16,785.08$ 0.00% No Change
Totals for 10/11/2017 24,025,370.00$ 26,100,039.00$ (2,074,669.00)$ 19,801,750.00$ 23,965,525.00$ (4,163,775.00)$ (4,963.22)$ Totals for 10/4/2017 94,270,461.00$ 111,276,885.00$ (17,006,424.00)$ 78,373,535.00$ 93,360,599.00$ (14,987,064.00)$ (17,864.58)$ Totals for 9/20/2017 59,732,089.00$ 66,382,787.00$ (6,650,698.00)$ 48,435,430.00$ 54,336,153.00$ (5,900,705.00)$ (7,033.64)$ Totals for 9/13/2017 79,325,131.00$ 97,336,810.00$ (18,011,679.00)$ 64,056,842.00$ 92,362,220.00$ (28,305,378.00)$ (33,740.01)$ Totals for 8/30/2017 70,372,725.00$ 80,749,914.00$ (10,377,189.00)$ 54,838,830.00$ 73,395,626.00$ (18,556,796.00)$ (22,119.70)$ Totals for 8/23/2017 132,929,310.00$ 176,133,731.00$ (43,204,421.00)$ 98,664,735.00$ 157,184,708.00$ (58,519,973.00)$ (69,755.81)$ Totals for 8/9/2017 46,587,443.00$ 47,075,939.00$ (488,496.00)$ 29,892,442.00$ 46,388,615.00$ (16,496,173.00)$ (19,663.43)$
Running Total 507,242,529.00$ 605,056,105.00$ (97,813,576.00)$ 394,063,564.00$ 540,993,446.00$ (146,929,864.00)$ (175,140.39)$
The Market value decrease for 2017 is ( $97,813,576) is of 10/11/2017
The Taxable Value decrease for 2017 is ($ 146,929,864) As of 10/11/2017
The County Tax dollar Difference for 2017 is ( $ 175,140.39) As of 10/11/2017
The county Tax dollar differences are the County General and County Municipal line rates.
Memorandum:
Date: October 11, 2017
To: Council Members
From: Annette Singleton
Re: Eastern Summit County Planning Commission
Today, October 11, 2017, we will interview the following three applicants for one vacancy on the Eastern Summit County Planning Commission: Marion Wheaton; Gale Pace; and Amy Rydalch. After the interviews, Council will hold a closed session to discuss appointing a member to serve. Appoint one member to the Eastern Summit County Planning Commission. The member shall serve the unexpired term of Sean Wharton; term expires February 28, 2020.
Memorandum:
Date: October 11, 2017
To: Council Members
From: Annette Singleton
Re: Peoa Recreation Special Service District
Today, October 11, 2017, we will interview the following three applicants for three vacancies on the Peoa Recreation Special Service District: David Blazzard (reapplying); Bailey Stembridge; and Thayne Stembridge (reapplying). After the interviews, Council will hold a closed session to discuss appointing three members to serve. Appoint three members to the Peoa Recreation Special Service District. Terms of service shall
expire August 31, 2021.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Summit County Council
FROM: Matt Leavitt, Summit County Finance Officer
DATE: October 5, 2017
SUBJECT: Staff report regarding 2018 Truth in Taxation required public meeting
This staff report and included presentation materials are for the first public meeting that is required
under the “Truth in Taxation” statute, which will occur on October 11, 2017 as part of the County
Council’s regular meeting. Since the Council has already been presented this information, this public
meeting is mainly for the benefit of the Summit County citizens.
THE PROBLEM:
Summit County will have to cut important programs and service levels that are supported by the
general and municipal services property tax revenues in order to adopt a balanced budget.
BACKGROUND:
Summit County is a vibrant community with the perception that there is substantial growth occurring.
While population growth levels are approximately 1.5% growth per year, the County is recognizing
significant growth related to jobs (4.2% per year). The significant growth in jobs, while significantly
beneficial to the County, has created the idea that the County is experiencing substantial building
growth. However, average annual building permits issued in the most recent years are only half of the
number of annual average building permits issued before the 2010‐2012 recession period. The result is
that the type of growth that we are experiencing does not produce enough new property tax revenue to
support current service levels or to continue making advancements on the Council’s strategic objectives.
Since 2008 property tax revenues in the general and municipal services funds combined have remained
relatively flat, increasing less than 1.6% per year. As the County has addressed the growing needs for
programs and services, budgets for those funds have increased at a rate of 3.0% per year. One of the
areas that is included in this 3.0%
annual growth includes cost of living
adjustments for employees, modest
merit pay incentives and the increased
cost of benefits. Budget decisions by
the Council included the intentional
use of available resources for capital
expenditures such as the Kamas
building and the acquisition of the
Cline/Dahle property as well as
services for the community such as the ‐
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Property Tax Revenues
County
Municipal
addition of services around the Council’s strategic priorities, the County’s contribution to Communities
That Care and other wellness/substance abuse programs.
While estimating the impacts of inflation (dashed lines on chart), property tax revenues have failed to
keep pace. According to Utah State Senator Howard Stephenson, “Taxing entities are expected to raise
rates and capture inflation every five to eight years.” While the general fund (blue line on chart) has not
had an increase in property tax revenues as a result of the truth in taxation process, the municipal
services fund (green line on chart) went through the truth in taxation process in 2013. As can be seen on
the chart, in 2013 the municipal services fund was able to recapture some of the lost purchasing power
through the truth in taxation process while the general fund has fallen behind.
Recognizing that efforts could be made towards reducing expenses and increasing efficiencies, the
County has made efforts to adopt a balanced budget with estimated resources that are available. Efforts
to achieve efficiencies include the recent dispatch merger, self‐checkout of library books, documents
made available online, holding and analyzing the needs of some positions to achieve salary savings, in‐
house or low cost staff training, raising tipping fees, and moving towards self‐insurance and high
deductible plans for employee health insurance and risk management programs.
In order to address the increasing demands for services with limited resources, the County has used fees
for services to help offset increasing costs. Fees such as the curbside collection fee implemented in 2016
have helped delay but not prevent the need for the County to address property tax revenues. In
addition, certain resources received by the County are restricted in their availability to be used for
operations. To go further, even certain specific resources within funds may have additional restrictions
on their use.
It is important to note that resources that the County has utilized for programs such as open space
acquisition, E‐bike programs, and fairground improvements have not come from general or municipal
services property tax revenues. These programs have been funded by resources that are restricted for
specific uses.
Some of the programs and services that are funded or partially subsidized by general and municipal
services property tax revenues are:
General Fund Municipal Services Fund
Corrections Law enforcement
Public health Snow plowing
Library Road maintenance
Waste collection Planning & zoning
Ambulance
The County must address the impacts of inflation in order to continue to successfully provide programs
and maintain levels of services to which are community has become accustomed. Without an increase
in property tax revenues, the County will be forced to reduce or eliminate programs and services to
adopt a balanced budget.
Property tax revenues provide a more reliable and steady foundation to build County programs and
services. The process for collecting property revenues was created so that taxing authorities such as
counties have a more dependable source of revenue compared to other economy‐based revenue
sources such as fees. It is essential to establish a correct funding level for property tax revenues.
Taxpayers in Summit County paid $139.3 million in property taxes in 2016 (most recent completed tax
cycle). Summit County’s portion of the total tax bill is only 15% ($20.1). By comparison, on a state‐wide
average counties typically receive approximately 19% of the county tax bill.
RECOMMENDATION:
Summit County needs to increase property tax revenues to maintain expected service levels in the
community and address the impacts of inflation.
Staff is recommending a $3.0 million increase in the general fund property tax revenues (27%) and $1.1
million increase in the municipal services fund property tax revenues (27%). This means an increase of
5.5% ‐ 7.0% increase on the average property tax bill for primary residents of Summit County. For
unincorporated areas of the County, the increase would be approximately $34.90 for $100,000 of
taxable (not market) value. Incorporated areas (general fund only), the increase would be approximately
$19.50 for $100,000 of taxable (not market) value.
The County has the lowest general fund tax rate of all 29 counties in the State and the lowest tax rate
compared to the incorporated (municipal) areas of the County. With the proposed increases, the County
would have the second lowest tax rate (Utah County would be the lowest by a small difference) and still
lowest tax rate among the incorporated areas of the County.
Without an increase in property tax revenues the County will need to reduce budgeted expenditures
in core government services and will not be able to fund programs related to the Council’s strategic
objectives (which are a direct response to community needs).
The Council has already asked what we won’t be able to do or what areas of service we would need to
reduce in order to balance the budget if no tax increase is adopted. We know that all of our services are
important to someone or many, but the only areas that we have available are those supported by the
subject funds. Many of these areas are core services of our County government or they are community
priorities that the Council has raised in the past few years as strategic goals. These programs include:
Public Safety
o Addressing law enforcement within incorporated areas;
o Working inmate program;
o Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI) and its substance abuse programs;
Roads and Bridges
o Changes in snow plow schedules and priorities;
o Further defer maintenance on our critical transportation corridors
Health Department programs and services
Environmental sustainability programs including the Council’s objective for a net zero emissions;
Additional transportation funding beyond the scope of those provide by the additional mass
transit sales tax;
Economic development programs and affordable housing objectives;
o Any program furthering the objectives with the Cline/Dahle parcel;
Mental wellness programs and services that are dependent on County resources (not grant
funded);
Library programs and services;
In addition to other programs and services that are funded by general or municipal services property tax
revenues.
Staff is additionally recommending that the Council adopt by Resolution the policy to address and
make recommendations regarding the status of property tax revenues on a more frequent basis.
Recognizing that it is the intention of the State Code to raise rates and capture inflation every five to
eight years, the County will make the process of reviewing property tax revenues in relation to inflation
an annual practice as part of the budget recommendations made by the Budget Committee and County
Manager. The recommendation of increasing property tax revenues and therefore going through the
truth in taxation process should rise to the level of the County Council on the frequency of at least once
every five years. A draft resolution is attached with the staff report.
NEXT STEPS:
This meeting satisfies the requirement for a public meeting on the subject at least 14 days prior to
Election Day the first week in November. Further process on Truth in Taxation is as follows:
By November 1st: a parcel specific notice must be mailed to property owners which includes (1)
value of the property for the current year (2017), (2) the tax on the property for the current
year, (3) estimated tax on the property with the proposed increase, (4) date, time and place of
the public hearing(s) (December 6 and 13), and (5) statement from 59‐2‐919(3)(c)(iv)1.
1 Statement required: “Summit County is proposing a tax increase for 2018. This notice contains estimates of the tax on your property and the proposed tax increase on your property as a result of this tax increase. These
o This parcel specific notice can and will be mailed with the property tax notices in order
to reduce expenses.
November 22nd: the County is required to notify the public with a newspaper advertisement,
post on the public notice website, and suggested to post on the County’s web site the truth in
taxation advertisement which is filled out on the Certified Tax Rate System.
November 29th: a second advertisement with the same information must be issued.
December 6th: the County will hold its first public hearing on the 2018 budget which may include
the recommended increase.
After the December 13th public hearing on the 2018 budget the property tax increase may be
adopted by resolution.
By June 22, 2018 the County Council will approve the 2018 tax rates. This will include general
and municipal services funds rates sufficient to generate the additional property tax revenues as
part of the adopted 2018 budget.
o Before July 2018 the County Auditor will send disclosure notices to property owners.
These disclosure notices will include the tax rate that is approved by the County Council.
By November 1, 2018 the County will mail property tax notices which will include the new rates.
estimates are calculated on the basis of 2017 data. The actual tax on your property and proposed tax increase on your property may vary from this estimate.”
SUMMIT COUNTYF A C E S A N I M P O R T A N T D E C I S I O N
• Infl ation has drastically reduced our purchasing power.• The cost for quality services and programs continues to rise, but property tax revenues
are not increasing.
• Population growth has slowed and residential permits are down.• Summit County is a vibrant community with a growing economy and workforce.
But consistently low residential and commercial building permits has caused decreasing“new growth” revenues each year.
• Budget expenditures have grown to meet increased community needs/demands.
• The County has also taken advantage of opportunities to “pay as you go” to fund capitalprojects like the Kamas Services Building and the Cline/Dahle project.
County revenues from property taxes are not suffi cient to meet essential and growing community needs.
Property tax revenues are essential to providing basic services for residents, and continuing our progress in the areas of environmental sustainability and other valued programs.
• Summit County receives 15% of the overall property tax revenue collected. That revenue funds the General and Municipal funds which support the following services and programs:
• Law enforcement
• Snow plowing
• Road maintenance
• Ambulance service
• Waste collection
• Corrections
• Library
• Public health
• Basic antennatelevision service
• Youth recreation
• Communitydevelopment andplanning
The County has the lowest tax rate of all 29 counties in Utah.
Summit County has not increased the property tax rate for the General fund for more than 30 years.
THE PROBLEM
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?
• This 27% increase in revenue triggers a “truth in taxation” public hearing process. The County Council votes on the recommended increase.
• Residents are encouraged to learn about or comment on the proposed increase at an upcoming public meeting or public hearing scheduled for: October 11, 2017 December 6, 2017 December 13, 2017
• The Utah Taxpayers Association recommends that taxing entities raise rates through truth in taxation every fi ve to eight years to address infl ation.
T R U T H I N T A X A T I O N
PROPOSED SOLUTION
RISKS OF NOT ACTING
• The average home owner will see an increase of 5.5-7% on their property tax bill.
County staff is recommending a $4.1 million increase to the Municipal and General funds to address the impacts of infl ation and maintain expected service levels in the community.
Without a rate increase, the County will be required to slow progress in key areas and implement cost-saving measures which could impact basic services.
Increase the total property tax bill by
$34.90 A YEAR PER $100,000 of taxable home value (not market value).
Increase the total property tax bill by
$19.50 A YEAR PER $100,000 of taxable home value (not market value).
UNINCORPORATED AREAS INCORPORATED AREAS
TRUTH IN TAXATION
• Impacts to basic services like law enforcement and road maintenance
• Defer needed projects in waste collection and the Sheriff ’s Offi ce
• Reduction in access to mental health programs
• Impacts to staff wages and benefi ts
• Slowed momentum in areas such as workforce housing and environmental sustainability