Top Banner
International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010
17

International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Jan 03, 2016

Download

Documents

Hillary Wiggins
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

International Patent Filing:

The University Perspective

Technology Transfer TacticsAugust 5, 2010

Page 2: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Overview

• Emory Statistics• General Patent Filing

Overview• Licensee Issues• Nationalization and

Regionalization Examples and Strategies

• Conclusion

04/20/23 2Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 3: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Overview of Filing Practices

• About 200 ID’s per year • File about 65-70 provisional

patent applications per year• Focused in healthcare

04/20/23 3Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 4: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Overview of Filing Practices

• International Filings

04/20/23 4Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 5: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Overview of Filing Practices

• International Filings – past EPO

04/20/23 5Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 6: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Initial Filing Decisions For Emory

• Focused in technology areas with long ramp up times– Ready for filing vs must publish– Almost all provisional applications

• When publication imminent –– Do you need European rights??

• Keep grace periods in mind– Canadian Example

• Publication• Diagnostic test (unlikely to enter

foreign)• Canadian company interested

– 1 year general grace period

04/20/23 6Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 7: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Initial Filing Decisions For Emory

• Does international filing make sense?– Emory ex-US filed technologies – • overall income >$720M

(>$190M without royalty sale) (2000-2009)

– Other, non-ex-US filed revenue ~$20M

– Example – Largest royalty stream - >60% from ex-US sales since 2005

04/20/23 7Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 8: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Conversion Decisions

• PCT vs US only–Historical filing strategies

– PCT and US– PCT only–US only

–Technology Type–Device– Software– Pharma

» Therapeutics» Diagnostics

04/20/23 8Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 9: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Speed of Prosecution

• PCT filing delays prosecution• USPTO examination tracks– Accelerated Examination

• Claim limits and ESD– Patent Prosecution Highway

programs• If favorable examination in “office of

first filing”, get claims accelerated in other PTOs– Currently: Australia, Canada, Denmark, EPO,

Japan, Korea, Singapore

– Triple Tier Examination Proposal• Fast track (no ESD), regular, slow

track

04/20/23 9Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 10: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Technology Timing

• How long does it take to get to “Proof of Principle”

• Prototyping - <1 year • Drug Discovery

10Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 11: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Licensing Issues• Timing of License

– Technology type and effect on licensing– 2009 Cancer Institute Study

• 50% of licenses executed in 3 years from first filing and >90% by 8 years

• Emory – ~45% by 3 years, ~90% by 8 years

• Later deals in pharma – potential higher royalties, better up fronts

• Support longer development times

04/20/23 11Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 12: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Licensee Needs

• What purpose does patent serve?–For litigation, where are

potential infringers?• Market size• Manufacturers (without US

import)• Competitors

–For ‘value add’, is there high perceived value in industry?

04/20/23 12Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 13: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Licensee Issues

• What do licensees expect– Technology type decisions

• Will the license get done?• How will it affect the deal terms?

– Cost-benefit analysis• International filing costs: EPO

alone >20K, overall >100K to be expected

• Expect at least 20-40K before reimbursement - will you increase deal value by that?

04/20/23 13Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 14: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Nationalization Decisions

• Licensed vs unlicensed case

• Examples– 75-80% nationalization

decisions – unlicensed• Examples

– Inflammatory disorders – ex-US; – Quantum dot coating – US only

• Strategies for cost reduction• Keep your eye on the ball!!

04/20/23 14Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 15: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Nationalization Decisions

• Special problems with start ups– Largely immune to costs– Floating debt– Want broad filings to ‘increase

value’

• Strategies for cost reduction– Budget, budget, budget–Watch the bottom line– Do not lose control

04/20/23 15Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 16: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Validation Decisions

• Licensed vs Unlicensed– Where does one typically validate– Why do you care where a licensee

validates– Validating on your own dime

• “Sunk Cost” issue• Will you enforce?

• Costs– Translations – London Agreement– What are the claims??

• Example of claim limitations

04/20/23 16Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products

Page 17: International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.

Strategies

• Keep goal in mind –– Don’t undermine global

opportunity, but cost-benefit differs depending on opportunity

• Take control!!– Get budget and watch it– Shop for alternative options – Delay high costs until license–Watch costs for risky licensees

04/20/23 17Gateway to Discovery, Innovation, and

Products