International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education P.O. Box 3960 Olathe, Kansas 66063 USA Annual Report – Accredited Member Institution: Palm Beach Atlantic University Academic Business Unit: Rinker School of Business Academic Year: 2010-11 International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education
23
Embed
International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education › docs › library... · International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education P.O. Box 3960 Olathe, Kansas 66063 USA
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education P.O. Box 3960
Olathe, Kansas 66063 USA
Annual Report – Accredited Member Institution: Palm Beach Atlantic University
Academic Business Unit: Rinker School of Business
Academic Year: 2010-11
In
tern
atio
nal A
ssem
bly
for
Col
legi
ate
Bus
ines
s E
duca
tion
IACBE Annual Report Form 2
IACBE ANNUAL REPORT For Academic Year: 2010-11
This annual report should be completed for your academic business unit and submitted to the IACBE by
November 1 of each year.
General Information
Institution’s Name: Palm Beach Atlantic University
X Check here if this represents a change from the previous year.
Programmatic Information
1. Did you terminate any business programs during the reporting year?
X No
Yes. If yes, please identify the terminated programs on a separate page at the end of this report.
2. Were changes made in any of your business programs?
X No
Yes. If yes, please identify the changes on a separate page at the end of this report.
3. Were any new business programs (including new majors, concentrations, and/or emphases)
established during the academic year?
No (skip to the Outcomes Assessment section below)
X Yes. If yes, please identify the new programs on a separate page at the end of this report, and answer item 4 below.
IACBE Annual Report Form 5
4. If applicable, was approval of your institutional accrediting body required for any of the programs
identified in item 3 above?
X No
Yes. If yes, please attach a copy of the material that you sent to your institutional accrediting body.
Outcomes Assessment
1. Has your outcomes assessment plan been submitted to the IACBE?
X Yes
No. If no, when will the plan be submitted to IACBE?
2. Is the original or revised outcomes assessment plan that you submitted to the IACBE still current or
have you made changes?
X The outcomes assessment plan that we have previously submitted is still current.
Changes have been made and the revised plan is attached.
We have made changes and the revised plan will be sent to the IACBE by:
3. Complete the Outcomes Assessment Results form below and include it with this annual report to
the IACBE. Note: Section II of the form (Operational Assessment) needs to be completed only if
you received first-time accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation after January 1, 2011.
An example of a completed form can be found in a separate document that is available for
download on the IACBE’s website at: www.iacbe.org/accreditation-documents.asp.
Section I (Student Learning Assessment) of the Outcomes Assessment Results form must be
completed for each business program that is accredited by the IACBE (i.e., a separate table must be
provided for each program).
Performance targets/criteria are the criteria used by the academic business unit in evaluating
assessment results to determine whether intended outcomes have been achieved. For example, if
the academic business unit is using the ETS Major Field Test as one of its direct measures of student
learning, then a performance target might be that the Institutional Mean Total Score on the exam
will place students in the upper quartile nationally; or if the academic business unit is using a
comprehensive project in a capstone course as a direct measure of student learning, then a
performance target might be that 80% of the students will score at the highest level (e.g., proficient,
exemplary, etc.) on each project evaluation criterion.
Remember that your outcomes assessment plan needs to include two or more direct and two or
more indirect measures of student learning. These measures should be used at the program level.
At the bottom of each section of the form, space is provided to identify changes and improvements
that you plan to make as a result of your assessment activity.
IACBE Annual Report Form 6
Italicized entries in the form represent areas where the academic business unit should insert its own
assessment information. Add tables and insert rows in the tables as needed.
Other Issues
Briefly comment on other issues pertaining to your academic business unit that you would like to share
with the IACBE.
IACBE Annual Report Form 7
Outcomes Assessment Results For Academic Year: 2010-11
Section I: Student Learning Assessment
Student Learning Assessment for the Major in Business Administration - Undergraduate
Intended Student Learning Outcomes for Major in Business Administration - Undergraduate
1. Students will exhibit business appropriate communication skills.
2. Students will exhibit the ability to successfully perform in a group or team.
3. Students will exhibit an understanding of elements, standards, and application of critical thinking.
4. Students will exhibit business skills in the following areas: technology, research, finance, accounting, marketing, global business, management,
and business law.
5.Students will exhibit the ability to express a Christian Worldview as it relates to business practices.
Assessment Tools for Intended Student Learning Outcomes—
Direct Measures of Student Learning: Performance Targets/Criteria for Direct Measures:
1. Course rubric 75% of RSB students in the business capstone course will complete the
assignment with a score of good or better in the first 4 learning outcomes
above.
2. Rinker Learning Assessment Test (RLAT) Improvement in mean score from pre-test to post-test.
Assessment Tools for Intended Student Learning Outcomes—
Indirect Measures of Student Learning: Performance Targets/Criteria for Indirect Measures:
1. IDEA evaluations in four areas:
Communication skills
Team collaboration
Critical thinking
Christian integration
Meet or exceed the baseline measures established in the 2009-2010
academic year. The baseline measure is the mean percentage of
respondents selecting a “4” or “5” on 2009-2010 IDEA forms (tables E
through M of assessment report.
IACBE Annual Report Form 8
2. Employer evaluation Meet or exceed the baseline measures established in the 2009-2010
academic year. The baseline measure is 65%, the mean percentage of
respondents selecting a “4” or “5” on 2009-2010 employer evaluation
forms (table N of the assessment report) academic year.
Summary of Results from Implementing Direct Measures of Student Learning: Performance Target Was…
Met Not Met
1. Course Rubric: Using the course rubric in our undergraduate business strategy capstone course, the percentage of
students completing the assignments with a score of good or better exceeded 75% in each of the four measured
categories.
X
2. Rinker Learning Assessment Test: The RLAT assessment is an internally designed and administered test covering
each major discipline. It is designed to be administered as a pre-test (Intro to Business) and post-test (Business
Strategy). Since this was the second academic year we administered it, we are unable to compare pre-test to post-
test for the same students. However, the senior-level students did have a higher mean score (14% points higher)
than freshmen students. This is some evidence that students gain business skills and knowledge from the courses
taken.
X
Summary of Results from Implementing Indirect Measures of Student Learning: Performance Target Was…
Met Not Met
1. IDEA evaluations: The baseline measure is the mean percentage of respondents selecting a “4” or “5” on 2009-
2010 IDEA forms (tables E through M of assessment reports). X
2. Employer evaluation: The baseline measure is the mean percentage of employer respondents selecting a “4” or “5”
on 2009-2010 IDEA forms (table N of assessment reports). X
Proposed Courses of Action for Improvement in Areas for which Performance Targets Were Not Met:
1.
IACBE Annual Report Form 9
Student Learning Information for the Major in Business Administration - MBA
Intended Student Learning Outcomes for the Major in Business Administration - MBA
1. Students will demonstrate professional communication and teamwork skills.
2. Students will exhibit successful problem recognition, task management, and strategic integration tools.
3. Students will display sound, critical thinking, decision making skills using both qualitative and quantitative techniques.
4. Students will exhibit the ability to express a Christian Worldview as it relates to business practices.
Assessment Tools/Methods for Intended Student Learning Outcomes— Direct Measures of Student Learning
Performance Targets/Criteria for Direct Measures:
1. Course rubric in MBA Strategy course 75% of RSB students in the MBA capstone course will complete the assignment with a score of good or better in the first 3 learning outcomes above.
2. Course rubric in MBA Business Research Course 75% of RSB students in the MBA capstone course will complete the assignment with a score of good or better in the first 3 learning outcomes above.
3. Rinker Learning Assessment Test (RLAT) Improvement in mean score from pre-test to post-test.
Assessment Tools/Methods for Intended Student Learning Outcomes— Indirect Measures of Student Learning
Performance Targets/Criteria for Indirect Measures:
1. IDEA evaluations in four areas:
Communication skills
Team collaboration
Critical thinking
Christian integration
Meet or exceed the baseline measures established in the 2009-2010
academic year. The baseline measure is the mean percentage of
respondents selecting a “4” or “5” on 2009-2010 IDEA forms (tables E
through M of assessment report.
Summary of Results from Implementing Direct Measures of Student Learning: Performance Target Was…
Met Not Met
1. Course Rubric: Using the course rubric in our MBA strategy capstone course, the percentage of students completing the assignments with a score of good or better exceeded 75% in each of the four measured categories.
X
IACBE Annual Report Form 10
2. Course Rubric: Using the course rubric in our MBA business research course, the percentage of students completing the assignments with a score of good or better exceeded 50% in each of the four measured categories.
X
3. Rinker Learning Assessment Test: The RLAT assessment is an internally designed and administered test covering each major discipline. It 2008-2009, we designed and used the undergraduate RLAT exam. We then intended to use that experience to build a graduate version of the RLAT for MBA students. That test was not completed during 2010-2011.
X
Summary of Results from Implementing Indirect Measures of Student Learning: Performance Target Was…
Met Not Met
1. IDEA evaluations: The baseline measure is the mean percentage of respondents selecting a “4” or “5” on 2009-
2010 IDEA forms (tables Q through X of assessment reports). X
Proposed Courses of Action for Improvement in Areas for which Performance Targets Were Not Met:
1. (Direct measures) RLAT: As of the end of 2009-2010, the MBA version of RLAT was not completed. (Direct Measure #3). The RLAT exam we have been using in the undergraduate degree program is not yielding the richness of data analysis that we desire. In the 2012-2013 academic year, we will be returning to the use of Major Field Achievement Test (MFAT) for both undergraduate and graduate degree programs. MFAT will become the replacement for our internally generated RLAT.
(Indirect Measures) IDEA Evaluation Results: We were slightly below the baseline mean in three of the four areas of IDEA evaluations.
Communication skills 61%, baseline of 66%; Critical thinking 67%, baseline of 71%; Christian Integration 50%, baseline of 53%. We exceeded the
baseline in Team collaboration at 80%, with a baseline of76%. We will continue using these assessments and in our courses we will continue our
focus on communication skills, team collaboration, critical thinking, and Christian integration. (See Table Z)
IACBE Annual Report Form 11
Section II: Operational Assessment (Note: Complete this section only if you received first-time accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation after
January 1, 2011.)
Operational Assessment for (Name of Academic Business Unit)
Mission of the (Name of Academic Business Unit):
(Mission Statement)
Intended Operational Outcomes:
1. (Intended Operational Outcome 1)
2. (Intended Operational Outcome 2)
3. (Intended Operational Outcome 3)
4. (Intended Operational Outcome 4)
Assessment Measures for Intended Operational Outcomes: Performance Targets/Criteria for Operational Assessment Measures:
1. (Measure for Intended Operational Outcome 1) (Target/Criterion for Measure 1)
2. (Measure for Intended Operational Outcome 2) (Target/Criterion for Measure 2)
3. (Measure for Intended Operational Outcome 3) (Target/Criterion for Measure 3)
4. (Measure for Intended Operational Outcome 4) (Target/Criterion for Measure 4)
Summary of Results from Implementing Operational Assessment Measures: Performance Target Was…
Met Not Met
1. (Results for Measure 1)
2. (Results for Measure 2)
1. (Results for Measure 3)
IACBE Annual Report Form 12
2. (Results for Measure 4)
Proposed Courses of Action for Improvement in Areas for which Performance Targets Were Not Met:
1. (Course of Action 1)
2. (Course of Action 2)
3. (Course of Action 3)
4. (Course of Action 4)
IACBE Annual Report Form
Page 4, Question 3
During 2010-2011, a new track within the management major, non-profit management, became effective.
Students in this track take the same general education, business core, and management core of all
management majors. The track consists of three courses in non-profit management. The courses are:
• Fundraising and Marketing for Non-Profit Organizations
• Volunteer & Board Development for Non-Profit Organizations
• Program Management & Evaluation for Non-Profit Organizations
During the development of this track, the Dean, Dr. David Smith, contacted IACBE staff to inquire about
IACBE approval of the new track. The answer we received was the change was not significant enough to