Top Banner

of 3

International Affairs Volume 64 Issue 3 1988 [Doi 10.2307%2F2622876] Review by- A. S. Cohan -- Bureaucracy.by David Beetham

Feb 26, 2018

Download

Documents

Ramy Al-Gamal
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 7/25/2019 International Affairs Volume 64 Issue 3 1988 [Doi 10.2307%2F2622876] Review by- A. S. Cohan -- Bureaucracy.by

    1/3

    Bureaucracy. by David BeethamReview by: A. S. CohanInternational Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol. 64, No. 3 (Summer,1988), pp. 482-483Published by: Wileyon behalf of the Royal Institute of International Affairs

    Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2622876.Accessed: 27/01/2015 22:25

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of

    content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms

    of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    WileyandRoyal Institute of International Affairsare collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend

    access toInternational Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-).

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:25:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=blackhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=riiahttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2622876?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2622876?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=riiahttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=black
  • 7/25/2019 International Affairs Volume 64 Issue 3 1988 [Doi 10.2307%2F2622876] Review by- A. S. Cohan -- Bureaucracy.by

    2/3

    482

    BOOK

    REVIEWS

    The capitalist

    evolution:

    fifty ropositions

    bout

    prosperity,quality

    nd

    liberty. y

    Peter

    L. Berger.Aldershot, ants: Wildwood

    House. 1987.

    262pp.

    ndex. Pb.: ?6.95. ISBN 0 7045

    0558 4.

    IN THIS fascinating

    ook Peter

    Berger

    ontinues is

    ociological nvestigationnto henature f

    capitalism, efined yhim s production or market y enterprisingndividuals rcombines

    with hepurpose

    f

    making profit p. 19).

    His

    purpose

    here s to draw

    heoutline fa theory

    concerning

    herelation etween

    apitalism

    nd

    society

    n

    the

    modernworld

    p. 3), and hedoes

    this by developing some fifty ropositions

    bout this

    relationship

    n the

    course

    of

    his

    argument-for nstance,

    Industrial

    apitalism

    as

    generated

    he

    greatest roductive ower

    n

    human history p. 36).

    The

    propositions

    re drawn

    from wide-ranging nd interesting

    discussion

    hat

    ncompasses

    most

    f

    the classic themes nd debates n the

    nature

    f

    capitalism.

    The discussion

    overs conomic

    materialismnd

    efficiency,lass,political

    ibertiesnd

    personal

    liberation, evelopment,

    nd the

    nature f industrial

    ocialism .However,Berger as extended

    his analysis oexplain hephenomenon

    f

    whathe calls

    East

    Asian

    capitalism , hich

    he

    argues

    provides

    second

    case ,

    an

    opportunity

    o assess

    capitalism

    utside he onfines f

    tsWestern

    geographicalnd historicalrigins. he use of hissecondcase giveshim he hance o separate

    the impact

    of

    capitalism

    from

    that

    of

    modernization.

    And this allows him

    to draw his

    conclusions

    much

    more

    firmly.

    Each

    of

    Berger s

    50

    propositions

    s

    designed

    o be

    empirically

    establewithin n

    implicit

    Popperianmethodology

    f

    falsifiability,

    nd

    he

    is

    very

    areful ot to set

    up relationships

    nd

    entities

    by

    definition.

    he

    net

    result

    s a book

    unusual

    in

    its

    construction nd

    clarity

    f

    reasoning,

    hich

    n

    effectets ut

    an ambitious esearch

    rogramme

    n

    thebasisofthe mpirical

    testing

    f his

    propositions.

    Many

    readers fthis ournal

    may egitimately

    sk

    why

    tudents

    f

    nternational

    ffairshould

    devote proportion

    f their

    ncreasinglyrecious

    eading

    ime o a book on

    capitalism ritten

    by a sociologist.Although

    am not one of thosewho

    argue

    hat

    more

    ociology s necessarily

    good for n understandingf nternationalffairs,hisbook is both relevant nd interesting

    sociology.

    The

    time

    when

    the

    analysis

    of

    capitalism

    ould

    be

    safely eft o Marxists nd

    sociologists

    s

    long past.

    If

    we as

    students

    eeking

    n

    understanding

    f

    nternationalelations

    cannot

    r do not

    take

    n board

    he

    nsights

    nd

    understandingrovided

    rom ther

    pproaches,

    in

    the time-honoured

    radition

    f nternational

    elations,ur

    studieswill

    become ncreasingly

    left ehind.Not

    that his ook s the

    nswer: or

    me,Berger smethodologyssuspect, is ackof

    discussion

    f

    politics

    venmore

    o,

    and his

    continued

    ocus

    on

    thenational s

    opposed

    to the

    international

    spects

    of

    capitalism nsatisfactory.

    ut

    whether

    ne

    accepts

    he

    argument ut

    forward

    ere s not the

    point.

    The book cannotbe

    ignored

    because t is

    about

    a

    key part

    of

    internationalelations,

    nd

    because

    t

    attempts

    o

    beginconstructingtheoretical ramework

    within

    which the

    linkages

    between

    economic,

    technological, ocial, political

    and cultural

    elements fcapitalism an be moreadequatelyunderstood p. 31).

    North

    taffordshireolytechnic

    ROGER ToOZE

    Bureaucracy.

    ByDavid Beetham.

    MiltonKeynes:Open University

    ress.1987. 137pp.

    ndex.

    ISBN

    0 335 15372 0. Pb.: ISBN

    0 335 15371 2.

    THIS SLIM

    volume turnsout to contain

    rathermore than

    a readermight xpect. Professor

    Beetham

    argues that

    a variety f factors

    may lead anti-democratic

    endencies

    o occur in

    bureaucratic

    dministration,

    uttheres nothingnherent

    n thenature fbureaucracy o

    bring

    this bout.A better ndication fthedegree fbureaucraticself nclosure ikely o occur na

    community

    s the extent o which

    political

    nstitutions pt

    for

    secrecy

    over opennessand

    manipulative

    ctions o

    meet heparticular

    oalsof thecommunity.

    he converse f

    this-an

    open policy

    process,

    visible nd participatory-will

    esult

    n an absenceof such bureaucratic

    drawing

    n .

    To

    reach

    his

    onclusion,

    he uthor

    ooks first t some models

    of

    bureaucracy.

    e identifies

    three uchmodels:

    first he ociological

    r

    Weberian;

    econd,

    he

    political conomy

    model;

    and

    third,

    he public

    administration odel.

    In all of

    these

    he examines he dea of administrative

    efficiency,

    nd

    suggests

    hedifferent

    eanings

    hat he erm

    mplies

    or

    ach.

    He

    then

    urns o

    theories

    fbureaucratic

    ower,focusing

    n

    theWeberian

    nd Marxist

    iews,

    nd

    argues

    hat

    he

    This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:25:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 7/25/2019 International Affairs Volume 64 Issue 3 1988 [Doi 10.2307%2F2622876] Review by- A. S. Cohan -- Bureaucracy.by

    3/3

    Politics, conomics

    nd social

    483

    analyst ust onsider

    he

    ocial

    ndhistoricalontext

    n

    which

    bureaucracy

    s

    found ecauset

    is

    from

    hat

    ontexthat hebureaucratic

    rganization

    erives

    hat

    ower

    t

    has.

    Concluding

    thatach

    pproach

    gnores

    hat

    he

    ther as

    o

    ay,

    e

    rgueshat,

    aken

    ogether,

    oth

    ive s

    insightsnto

    henature fbureaucratic

    ower.

    eetham

    oncludes

    is

    bookwith

    chaptern

    bureaucracynd democraticheorynwhich heview uggestedtthe utsets expanded.

    This s

    a

    very eadable

    ork

    with nice ine

    f

    rgument

    bout

    what

    ureaucracies

    ay r

    may

    not

    become.What

    the

    book

    is

    not, however,

    s

    a

    nuts-and-bolts

    xamination

    f

    bureaucracy.

    twill e

    a most seful

    ntroductory

    ext or he

    tudy

    f

    heoriesf

    bureaucracy

    f

    taken n tandem ith more

    mpiricaliece.

    Universityf

    Lancaster

    A.

    S. COHAN

    The process fpolitical uccession.

    dited

    by

    PeterCalvert. London:

    Macmillan. 987.289pp.

    Index.

    ?33.00.

    ISBN

    0 333 42401 8.

    PETER CALVERT S

    book comprises setofpapers resentedotheECPR workshop n political

    succession held

    at

    Salzburg

    n

    April

    1984.

    The

    papers range widely. Specific tudies are

    addressed

    o

    the patterns

    f

    political

    uccessionwithin

    uch

    diverse ountries

    nd regions s

    Western

    urope,

    theBaltic

    during

    he

    nterwar

    eriod,

    Turkey,

    ld and

    new,

    the

    oviet

    Union,

    thePeople s Republic

    of

    China, Nigeria,

    and

    Argentina.

    General ssues are embraced

    n

    the

    introductorynd concluding ieces by Peter Calvert;there s a formal ublic-choice heory

    analysis

    of

    successor election;

    nd

    there s also an

    anthropological pproachto succession

    management

    nd

    legitimization.

    There

    s

    much

    of

    interest

    n

    many

    of

    the ndividual ontributions.

    he effectiveness

    f

    the

    collection

    s

    a whole is, however,

    ess clear.

    Anyshortcomings

    f the

    volume risefrom wo

    related ources.The first

    s

    that he declared

    focus s

    upon a process,which generates hree

    difficulties.irst, hougheast mportant,he mpiricaltudies renot ctually llfocused pon

    the

    processes

    f

    political uccession;

    ome

    chapters

    etain his

    focus,

    but the

    emphasis

    within

    others

    ends

    n

    two

    related,

    but

    distinct,

    irections: owards he

    sources

    f the

    changes hat

    precedepolitical uccession,

    r towards

    heconsequences

    nd

    effects

    f

    succession nce it has

    takenplace. Secondly, process

    focus

    ncourages

    somewhat

    mechanistic

    lavourn a

    number

    of

    the empirical

    tudies.

    And

    thirdly, process

    focus

    encounters erious theoretical

    ssues

    concerningherelationship

    etween

    processes

    nd

    substantive

    evelopments

    n

    political ife.

    The implication

    s that

    here

    s

    an

    mportant

    ink

    between uccession

    rocess

    nd

    substance, ut

    as

    this

    remains

    mplicit

    t

    generates

    he

    kind

    of

    conservative

    tmosphere

    ften dentifiedn

    functionalistnalyses.

    The secondproblem

    rea

    s

    related

    o the

    first,

    utnarrows own to

    the

    onceptual

    tatus nd

    centralityfthenotionofpolitical uccession tself.As entertainednthisvolume, histerm

    embraces hange

    n

    the

    dentity

    f the

    political eaders, hange

    f

    government,

    nd

    change

    f

    basic

    regime.

    Process

    approaches

    o

    political nalysis ncourage

    uch

    xpansive ategories,

    ut

    their

    ery xpansiveness ecessarily ubmerges

    he

    political

    contextwithinwhich

    processes

    occur,

    nd

    mpedes

    he

    development

    f

    uch

    xplanatory

    heory

    f ubstantive

    evelopments

    s

    is

    possible.

    Such

    reservations

    part,

    there s much n The

    process fpolitical

    uccession

    hatwill be of

    interesto more

    dvanced tudents

    oth

    f

    comparativeolitics

    n

    general

    nd of

    the

    politics

    f a

    number

    f countries nd

    regions

    n

    particular.

    UniversityfReading

    R.J.BARRYJ

    ONES

    State responsibilitynd

    the

    direct roadcast atellite.

    y

    Marika

    Natasha Taishoff. ondon:

    Pinter.1987. 203pp.

    Index.

    ?20.00.

    ISBN

    0 86187 7004.

    ONE ASPECT ofthe

    far-reachingmplications

    f

    modern

    echnology

    s the

    growingnterdepend-

    ence of states

    nd societies

    ecauseof new

    methods

    f

    nformation

    nd

    communication. part

    from he on-line ransport f data, this

    s

    especially rue

    n

    the spreadof new media of mass

    communication

    n

    general

    nd

    the

    development

    f the

    directbroadcast

    satellite DBS)

    in

    particular. atellites, ositioned

    n the

    geostationaryrbit,

    an cover

    up to

    40

    per centof the

    This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:25:10 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp