Top Banner
Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II Serous Borderline Tumors of the Ovary: Pathology, Biology, and Management Santa Monica, CA October 16, 2006 Jaime Prat, M.D. Nathalie Sieben, M.D. David Gershenson, M.D.
45

Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

elita

Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II Serous Borderline Tumors of the Ovary: Pathology, Biology, and Management. Jaime Prat, M.D. Nathalie Sieben, M.D. David Gershenson, M.D. Santa Monica, CA October 16, 2006. Surface epithelial ovarian tumors. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumors of the Ovary: Pathology, Biology, and Management

Santa Monica, CAOctober 16, 2006

Jaime Prat, M.D.Nathalie Sieben, M.D.David Gershenson, M.D.

Page 2: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Surface epithelial ovarian tumors

Page 3: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Ovarian Epithelial Tumors ___________________________________________________________________________________________

Serous MucinousEndometrioidClear cellTransitional cellUndifferentiated

Benign60%

BL10%

Ca30%

Page 4: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Tumors of the Ovary

• Benign 70% • Borderline 5-10%• Carcinomas 20-25%

Page 5: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

• Epithelial hyperplasia• Nuclear atypia• Mitotic activity• NO “destructive” stromal invasion

Borderline Ovarian Tumors(Low Malignant Potential)

WHO 1973-2003

Page 6: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Frequency 25-30% of Non-BgAge 30-50 yrsBilaterality 30%Stage I 70%

Serous Borderline Tumors

Page 7: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBT

Page 8: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBT

Page 9: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous carcinoma

Page 10: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumor Serous Carcinoma

Page 11: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumor

1. Branching papillae 2. Variable nuclear atypia3. No stromal invasion

Diagnostic Features

Page 12: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBT - Micropapillary pattern

Page 13: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II
Page 14: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBT - Micropapillary pattern

Page 15: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumors

Mean age 45 37Bilateral 22/96 (23) 12 (67)Exophytic growth 27/92 (29) 7/16 (44)

Stage I 78 (76) 5 (28) II+ 24 (24) 13 (72) (p = 0.0001)

Noninvasive implants 20 (83) 12 (92)Invasive implants 4 (17) 1 (8)

(a) Microinvasive + micropapillary (3 cases)

Prat J, de Nictolis M Am J Surg Pathol 2002

Typical Micropapillary n=102 (%) n=18 a (%)

Page 16: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBT - Micropapillary(More invasive implants?)

1999 Eichhorn et al Possible2002 Slomovitz et al No2002 Deavers et al Yes (17% vs 6%)2002 Prat & De Nictolis No2003 Gilks et al No2005 Longacre et al Yes

Overall survival similar to typical SBT

Page 17: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Carcinoma (> 3 mm) in SBT-MP

Page 18: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Cumulative literature: Excellent prognosisStanford data: Risk factor for disease progression

SBT with Microinvasion < 10 mm2

Page 19: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

• Stage• Florid epithelial proliferation (MP-cribriform pattern)• Microinvasion (?)• Type of peritoneal implants• Other factors yet unidentified

TA Longacre et alAm J Surg Pathol 2005

Serous Borderline Tumors(Risk of progression)

Page 20: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumors

Peritoneal Implants (30%)

Page 21: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II
Page 22: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Peritoneal Implants(SBT)

• Non-invasive- Epithelial- Desmoplastic

• Invasive Bell DA, et al Cancer 1988; 62:2212

Page 23: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Noninvasive epithelial implant

Page 24: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Noninvasive (desmoplastic) implant

Page 25: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Invasive implant

Page 26: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Invasive implant

Page 27: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Invasive implant

Page 28: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumors

Non-invasive implants Invasive implants

McCaughey et al 2/13 4/5Bell DA et al 3/50 5/6De Nictolis et al 0/10 4/9 Kennedy and Hart 1/25 0/1Seidman and Kurman 1/51 2/3 Gershenson et al 6/73 6/39Eichhorn et al 0/30 2/3 Bell KA et al 2/29 6/31 Prat and de Nictolis 0/34 3/6 Longacre et al 2/75 5/14

20/390 (5%) 37/117 (32%)

(Death from tumor 1984-2005)

Page 29: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline TumorsTwo hypotheses

Page 30: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumors

• 26 specimens from 10 patients• 23 microsatellite markers• Peritoneal implants (6 invasive, 4

noninvasive); lymph nodes (3) • Concordance in 22 tumors of 8

informative patients Sieben NLG et al J Pathol (in press) 2006

(Genome-wide allelotyping and B-RAF/K-RAS)

Page 31: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Sieben N et al. J Pathol (in press) 2006

Page 32: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Bord Stage Ca95% 1 54%91% 1-4 23%71% 2-4 20%

Serous Tumors(10 yr Survival)

Page 33: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBT in Lymph Nodes: 30%

LN: Mullerian cysts (endosalpingiosis)

SBT in lymph node

Page 34: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Borderline Tumor

Carcinoma

Page 35: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

TCCSBT 6th recurrence

Page 36: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer(Pathogenesis)

• Serous Borderline - B-RAF, K-RAS• Serous Ca - p53, LOH 17q21 (BRCA1),

13q12-q14 (BRCA2, RB1)• Mucinous tumors - K-RAS• Endometrioid Ca - Beta-catenin, PTEN, PIK3CA, Microsatellite instability

Page 37: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Expression Profiling of Serous Low Malignant Potential, Low-Grade, and High-Grade Tumors of the Ovary.Bonome T, et al. Cancer Res 2005; 65:10602

Overexpressed in SBT and Low-Grade Carcinoma• p53• p21• Cyclin D1• CIRP• c-FOS

Overexpressed in High-Grade Carcinoma• Cyclin E• CD20• STAT-1• Apoliprotein E• Rsf-1

Page 38: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Sieben N et al, J Clin Oncol 2005

Page 39: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Sieben N et alJ Clin Oncol 2005

Page 40: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

High GradeSBT

L G

Ovarian Serous Tumors

Page 41: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBT + MPSCa

Page 42: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

MPSCa

SBT + MPSCa

Page 43: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

Serous Tumors(Pathogenesis - Dualistic model)

Serous Ca

KRAS and BRAF mutations (70%)

G3

G1-2MP Ca (Inv)SBT-MPSBTBg

Singer et alAm J Pathol 2002

p53 mutations, LOH 17q (80%)

HER-2/neu amplification/overexpression

Page 44: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II

SBTs and Serous Carcinomas • SBT-MP pattern is a risk factor within the SBT category

rather than a separate category. Poor prognosis only with invasive implants.

• Non-invasive implants, common and benign• Invasive implants, rare (12%) and fatal (clonal)• Serous dualistic model (working guide)• Low grade serous carcinomas are rare (B-Raf, K-ras)• High grade serous carcinomas are common (p53, LOH,

chromosomal instability)

Page 45: Interactive Session Ovarian Cancer II