Top Banner
Moscow State University Faculty of Journalism
28

Interaction in media – the way to protect the reality

Dec 05, 2014

Download

Education

Ilya Stechkin

In this presentation I state the issue of changing roles of a journalist. I account the “repertoire” of journalist’s roles and focus upon the ones of Moderator/Facilitator and Mediator as the most important ones now. I declare the necessity for journalism as a profession to change its aims and targets in order to survive in the present-day reality.
I provide the background and conditions for “webigration” (emigration into the secondary reality, the web) in Russia, which mostly is uselessness of social activity in the primary reality. Thus I state the need for specialists who would reconnect the audience to the primary reality.

And consequently I speak about the problem of absence of education and proper training to prepare the specialists to work with the audience in the way I mentioned above.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Moscow State UniversityFaculty of Journalism

Page 2: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

INTERACTION IN MEDIA – THE WAY TO PROTECT THE REALITY

Ilya Stechkin, Ph.D.

July, 2011Rome

Page 3: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

JOURNALIST’S ROLES IN THE INTERNET

Page 4: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Traditional Actualized Modern

Author

Editor Organizer

Agent of Influence

Moderator/Facilitator

Producer

Marketologist/Sociologist

Mediator

Ensitor (content-manager)

Internet-user

Dispatcher

Page 5: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Traditional Actualized Modern

Author

Editor Organizer

Agent of Influence

Moderator/Facilitator

Producer

Marketologist/Sociologist

Mediator

Ensitor (content-manager)

Internet-user

Dispatcher

Page 6: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Traditional Actualized Modern

Author

Editor Organizer

Agent of Influence

Moderator/Facilitator

Producer

Marketologist/Sociologist

Mediator

Ensitor (content-manager)

Internet-user

Dispatcher

Page 7: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Traditional Actualized Modern

Author

Editor Organizer

Agent of Influence

Moderator/Facilitator

Producer

Marketologist/Sociologist

Mediator

Ensitor (content-manager)

Internet-user

Dispatcher

Page 8: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Traditional Actualized Modern

Author

Editor Organizer

Agent of Influence

Moderator/Facilitator

Producer

Marketologist/Sociologist

Mediator

Ensitor (content-manager)

Internet-user

Dispatcher

Page 9: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Traditional Actualized Modern

Author

Editor Organizer

Agent of Influence

Moderator/Facilitator

Producer

Marketologist/Sociologist

Mediator

Ensitor (content-manager)

Internet-user

Dispatcher

Page 10: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Traditional Actualized Modern

Author

Editor Organizer

Agent of Influence

Moderator/Facilitator

Producer

Marketologist/Sociologist

Mediator

Ensitor (content-manager)

Internet-user

Dispatcher

Page 11: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality
Page 12: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Audience

Active Passive

Page 13: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Active audience's conflict of expectations

Existing media practices

Monologue

General information

Content production

Gate-keeping

Real needs of the active audience

Respectful dialog

Practical results

Content navigation

«Gate opening» (facilitating)

Conclusion 1Conclusion 1

...The discrepancy between the existing media practices and the real needs

of the modern audience.

Page 14: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality
Page 15: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

RUSSIAN JOURNALISM ONLINE: THE CRISIS OF ABSENCE OF RESULTS

Page 16: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

No interaction — no trust!Mass Media without the audience's trust -

that is the crisis!

Page 17: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Targets and ways to reach them

Targets are:

· reconnection to the audience,

· reconnection of the audience to the “primary” reality,

· include the media in the social structure as an instrument of social dialogue.

The road-map:

· start to hear the audience’s needs (from the informational non-material to everyday material necessities),

· start the dialogue with the audience,

· help the audience to reach their targets.

Conclusion 2Conclusion 2

...The focus of journalist training should be made on interaction of a

journalist with the audience.

Page 18: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality
Page 19: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

MODERATOR/FACILITATOR

Page 20: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Ideal and Practice

Facilitator

Rules and Control

Mediation and discussion

Summary and facilitation

Special education for the moderator

Moderator

Rules

Control

Repressive mechanism

Out of the discussion

No summary

No special trainings for moderators

Conclusion 3Conclusion 3

...We are glad to Introduce you changes into the methodology of journalist education to make it correspond with the audience’s needs.

Page 21: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

Who are you, Mr. Moderator?

We started from the levels of work:

codification of rules

control

management ( “tamagoching” of the audience)

Then we found three models of this role:

Team-leader

Editor

Specialist (Expert)

Page 22: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality
Page 23: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

PERSPECTIVES: EDUCATING USERS

Page 24: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

A series of projects to prepare Internet-users (cases)

The first is a manual “Internet portal at school”, aiming at presenting the possibilities of the Internet to the students under the guidance of a more experienced user (a teacher).

The second element is the project HighEdWeb.ru, which is being piloted at present, devoted to the developers of universities' sites and helping sharing experience in this field. Its target is creating the now absent market that develops the infrastructure of higher education in Russia.

The 3rd is the Internet in professional activity. Our team has developed a course of effective use of the Internet for the workers of media industry.

And finally, the 4th element of the cycle is a special course “New technologies in the work of a teacher and researcher” for 50+ aged Inernet-users.

Conclusion 4Conclusion 4

...The user's culture should be formed in a different levels in a parallel.

Page 25: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality
Page 26: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

CONCLUSION

Page 27: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality

1. State the discrepancy between the existing media practices and the real needs of the modern audience.

2. The focus of journalist training should be made on interaction of a journalist with the audience.

4. The user's culture should be formed in a different levels in a parallel.

3. Introduce changes into the methodology of journalist education to make it correspond with the audience’s needs.

Page 28: Interaction in media –  the way to protect the reality