Top Banner
Intercultural Communication Marinita Schumacher
19

Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Apr 16, 2017

Download

Technology

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Intercultural Communication

Marinita Schumacher

Page 2: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Culture

• is linked to communication and a wide range of human experience including feelings, identity and sense-making

• provides people with different ways of thinking, seeing, hearing and interpreting the world

• involves a number of man-made, collective artefacts and is shared by the members of a social group

• is something that shapes one‘s behaviour or structures one′s perception of the world

Page 3: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Culture and Communication

• Culture is often defined in interrelation to communication:

"Culture is communication and communication is culture.“

!Culture is passed on via communication and communication reflects one′s culture

Hall, 2000

Page 4: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Cultural factors

• Behaviour is not only affected by culture but also by other factors such as – organizational norms– education – age – social class

• each of these factors can be understood and manifested in a cultural context

!while communicating we use different cultural habits and meaning systems

Page 5: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Intercultural Communication

• is a research field that studies how people from different cultural backgrounds communicate with each other

• is an instrument which transmits a certain meaning, composes and reinforces identity and expresses feelings

• is an instrument to connect with others

Page 6: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Constraints for intercultural understanding

• cognitive constraints– the frame of reference or world-view which provides a

backdrop that all new information is compared to or inserted into

• behaviour constraints– each culture has its own rules concerning proper behaviour

which affect verbal and nonverbal communication

• emotional constraints – different cultures regulate the display of emotions

differently. Some cultures get very emotional while others try to keep their emotions hidden

Ting-Toomey, 1999

Page 7: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

low- and high-context settings

• low-context settings– screens its direct

attention more to the literal meanings of words and less to the context surrounding the words

– we “say what we mean, and mean what we say”

– leaves few space for interpretation of the explicit message

• high-context settings– are designed to let in

implied meanings arising from the physical setting, relations or shared understandings

– nonverbal signals are used to infer, imply, insinuate or deliver messages that we want to transmit indirectly

Hofstede, 2002

Page 8: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Individual Strategy

• Depending on the kind of relationship, the situation and the purpose of communication the low- and high-context communication, used as an individual strategy, may be more or less explicit and direct.

!Low- and high-context communication are not only individual strategies, but may be used to understand cultural groups

Hofstede, 2002

Page 9: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Low- and high-context-culture

• Low-context-culture– values the individualist’s

goals– separates person and issue– is confrontational– uses logic-deductive thinking

and explicit codes of speech– expresses emotional

information through facial expressions, tone of voice and body movements

– individualist cultures tend to gravitate towards low-context starting points

• High-context-culture– values the collectivist’s

goals– merges person and issue– relies on contextual cues

and situational knowledge – uses implicit references

and indirect speech – masks its emotions – collectivist cultures tend to

use high-context communication

Hofstede, 2002

Page 10: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Situational Factors

• most people use a mixture of low- and high-context-communication

• even in the most direct, low-context setting, implicit meanings will be conveyed

• there are 3 factors that could affect the choice of direct or indirect communication in intercultural workplaces

– cultural identity– work status– time urgency

Hall, 2000

Page 11: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Cultural Identity: Third Culture

• intercultural communication takes place in a “third culture”

• Part of “third culture” dynamics is the establishment of common communication rules

• People take into account– the demand of situational characteristics– the cultural identity of the other person – the existence of shared intercultural norms

that are not necessarily the same as one's home culture.

Maletzke, 1996

Page 12: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

low-context communicators interacting with high-context communicators

should be mindful that

• building a good relationship can contribute to effectiveness over time and nonverbal messages and gestures may be as important as what is said

• status and identity may be communicated nonverbally and require appropriate acknowledgement

• face-saving and tact may be important and need to be balanced with the desire to communicate fully and frankly

Hofstedewww.idec.gr./mens

Page 13: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

high-context communicators interacting with low-context communicators

should be mindful that

• things can be taken at face value rather than as representative of layers of meaning

• roles and functions may be decoupled from status and identity

• efficiency and effectiveness may be served by a sustained focus on tasks

• direct questions and observations are not necessarily meant to offend, but to clarify and advance shared goals

• indirect cues may not be enough to get the attention

Hofstedewww.idec.gr./mens

Page 14: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Work status

• Individualists– don’t alter their

behaviour according to status

– value low power distance resulting in a more egalitarian approach

• Collectivists– use more

confrontational techniques when power and status increase

– tend to value high power distance or the unequal distribution of power

Hall, 2000

Page 15: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Time urgency• Monochronic

– one task at a time– efficient task

performance– need to save time and

energy– short-term framework,

time is tangible– stress caused by

deadlines will increase directness and terseness as they tend to be achievement-oriented and goal-driven

• Polychronic– many task are handled

simultaneously– less emphasis on

prioritising tasks and an approximate attitude to timeframes

– obscurer and less mindful of time constraints

– long-term perspective, time is fluid and flexible

– able to retain their composure and to draw on social support from other team members

Hall, 2000

Page 16: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Stereotypes

• Stereotypes often reflect the differences in socioeconomic status, religion or dialect

• It is important to suspend judgement, avoid misconceptions, narrow perspectives and immature reactions

• Stereotypes often contain a grain of truth, but cannot characterize an entire culture

• Getting the whole picture of culture needs active participation

Page 17: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

How to communicate effective

• Desire – to communicate– to connect with other humans– to be proactive when approaching a new culture

• Knowledge– knowing about other cultures will help to develop skills

and to act in a way that respects these preferences

• Stereotypes– reach beyond stereotypes

Page 18: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Conclusion

• Intercultural competence means understanding what culture is and how it works

• Culture is not congenital, but adapted and modified by the individual’s personality

• The knowledge about cultural concepts are useful to compare cultures that are relatively closed

• The various levels of culture show that culture can be seen as an onion-like construct

• Cultural understanding is a journey, that never finishes, because the process and the endpoints change constantly

Page 19: Inter Cultural Communication by Madam. Marinita Schumacher

Bibliography• Adler, N.J., 1997, International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior, New York, Wadsworth

Publishing• Hall, E.T./ Red Hall, M., 2000, Understanding Culture Differences, Intercultural Press Inc.,U.S• Hall, E.T./ 1959, The silent language, New York, Double Day• Hofstede G., 2006, Lokales Denken, globales Handlen, interkulturelle Zusammenarbeit und globales

Mangement, Berlin, DTV-Beck • Hofstede G., 1980: Culture‘s consequences: international differences in work-related. Beverly Hills,

Sage Publications• Hofstede G., 1994, Cultures and Organizations: software of the mind: intercultural. London

HarperCollins• Maletzke, G., 1996, Interkulturelle Kommunikation: zur Interaktion zwischen Menschen, Opladen.

Westdeutscher• Ting-Toomey, S., 1999, Communication Across Cultures (Guilford Communication Series) Guilford

Publications

• Learning Menu developed by Leonardo Project MENS available atwww.idec.gr./mens