Top Banner
Intensive Inventory Management Program Creating Competitive Advantage Through Education REGISTER NOW! http://id.tamu.edu
4

Intensive Inventory Management Program Sales % due to Inventory Current Inventory $ ... vs. Cost Matrix Stock Group Key Performance Attendees to Present Demand Pattern Attendees to

May 30, 2018

Download

Documents

lykiet
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Intensive Inventory Management Program Sales % due to Inventory Current Inventory $ ... vs. Cost Matrix Stock Group Key Performance Attendees to Present Demand Pattern Attendees to

Fermier Hall, MS 3367Texas A&M University

College Station, TX 77840-3367Phone: 979-845-4984

Fax: 979-845-4980http://id.tamu.edu

Phone: 979-845-4984 / 866-

260-2463 Fax: 979-845-4980http://readcenter.tamu.edu

Intensive Inventory Management Program

Creating Competitive Advantage Through Education

KEY TAKE-AWAYS>> Reduce obsolescence and right-size inventory investments >> Maximize your ROI on inventory while balancing customer service>> Measure forecast accuracy through focused forecasting>> Optimize safety stock investment>> Minimize total relevant cost >> Manage item-level profitability>> Effective use of IT & human resources

WHO SHOULD ATTEND?>> Inventory Planners / Coordinators>> Inventory Managers>> Purchasing Professionals>> Anybody who manages inventory in your firm

PROGRAM OUTLINE>> Inventory Stratification •Methods •Policies

>> Forecasting •Demandpatternanalysis •Methods

>> Replenishment •EOQ •Reorderpoint •Policies •ServiceVsCostMatrix

>> Performance Assessment & Benchmarks •ProcessAssessmentFramework •ProcessAssessmentWorkbook •FinancialBenchmarking - Asset Efficiency, Cash Flow, Growth, Profitability

>> Stock Analyzer •Spreadsheet-basedanalyzer •FinancialStatements •CriticalVariablesInput •FinancialMetricsOutput

>> Inventory Best Practices •ProcessDescription •Common,GoodandBestPractices •MethodologyDescription •KeyPerformanceIndicators

>> Conclusion

“We collaborated with Texas A&M on an inventory stratification project which has resulted in a successful classification of our inventory based on item level profitability. We have already seen a significant reduction in capital employed and expect to benefit from further decreases.”

KevinC.Reid, VicePresident-Procurement ThyssenKruppMaterials,N.A.

“I was impressed with the overall program at TAMU. When I look back to the program, I was impressed with the Item Stratifica- tion segmentation of Critical (A&B) Items and (C) Items.”

Randy Thomas, Regional Manager, WilsonSupply

REGISTER NOW!http://id.tamu.edu

Page 2: Intensive Inventory Management Program Sales % due to Inventory Current Inventory $ ... vs. Cost Matrix Stock Group Key Performance Attendees to Present Demand Pattern Attendees to

Stratification

Lead TimeDemand During Lead Time Safety Stock

ForecastingFill Rate

Reorder Point

Replenish

IntensiveInventoryManagementProgramdealswiththeSTOCKprocessessuchasinventorystratification,forecastingandreplenishment.Inventorystratificationistheprocessofclassifyingitemsintoacertainnumberofcategoriessothatmanagingthemday-to-daydoesnotbecomeunwieldy.Theinventorystratification processisusuallynotwelldefinedorgivendueimportance,anditoftengetsover-simplified.Whenappropri-ately used, it can play a pivotal role in defining policies and procedures for other inventory management processessuchasforecastingandreplenishment.Inventorystratificationmustbedonepriortoaddressingother inventory/purchasing related processes because it acts as a sledgehammer and thereby, places the com-panyinapowerfulpositionwitharelativelyquickreturn-on-investment.Thereforeinthisprogramyouwillbe exposedtovariousInventorystratificationmethodsandtaughthowtoleveragetheseresultsforforecasting.

The program will demonstrate various forecasting methods, helping you understand the best method to useforyourbusinesssetting.Youwillgethandsonexperienceanalyzingdemandpatterns,applyingvarious forecastingmethodsandevaluatingforecasterrortochoosethebestmethod.Theprogramwillalsohelpyouunderstandtheconceptof“Whattoorder?”and“Howtoorder?”formakingreplenishmentdecisions.Handsonsessionstodecidethereorderpointandreorderquantitieswillenhanceyour decisionmakingprocessinyourbusiness.

Youwillalsohearsuccessstoriesandstepstoimplementinventorymanagementbestpracticesfrom industryexpertsfrombothbusinessandITperspectives.TheSTOCKexercisewillwalkyouthrough theprocessofconnectinginventorydecisionstoshareholdervaluethroughyourfinancialstatements. At the end of the program you will be able to assess the stock processes in your company and develop aplanofactiontoimplementbestpracticesatyourcompanyrightaway.

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

DELIVERABLESOptimizing Distributor ProfitabilityBest Practices to a Stronger Bottom Line

F. Barry Lawrence • Senthil Gunasekaran • Pradip Krishnadevarajan

“Through knowledge learned from the inventory management program, attended by all our management and key salespersons, we have reduced our total inventory levels by over 20%”

BrentA.Burns,VicePresident,ISCBuildingMaterials,LP

“Texas A&M’s research has allowed our company to continue to stay ahead of our competition and excel in customer service.”

TimMiller,VicePresident–Operations, SecurityContractorServices,Inc.

A

B

C

D

T Y P I C A L I N V E N T O R Y M I X I D E A L I N V E N T O R Y M I X

A

B

C

D

Texas A&M multi-criteria inventory stratification

REGISTER NOW!http://id.tamu.edu

DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 Inventory Management WORKING SESSION: WORKING SESSION: WORKING SESSION: WORKING SESSION: Overview Inventory Stratification Forecasting Replenishment/Service Process Assessment vs. Cost Matrix Stock Group

Key Performance Attendees to Present Demand Pattern Attendees to EXERCISE: Linking Indicators and EXERCISE Results and Policies Classification Present Results Inventory Management to Shareholder Value

EXERCISE: Inventory Inventory Stratification - Replenishment Policies Debrief and Discussion Inventory Management Carrying Cost Concluding Remarks Challenges and Benefits

Inventory Stratification Forecasting EXERCISE: Inventory Buy Decision - EOQ EXERCISE: Inventory Stock Out Cost Management Recap

EXERCISE: Sample EXERCISE: Forecasting Replenishment Policies - GUEST LECTURE: Discussions and Stratification Analysis Rounds 1 & 2 Continued Inventory Management Questions Business Perspective

WORKING SESSION: Forecasting Continued EXERCISE: ROP GUEST LECTURE: Certification Presentation Data Preparation for Inventory Management Inventory Stratification IT Perspective

Discussion and Discussion and CASE STUDY: Stock Group Discussion and Questions Questions From Optimizing Questions Distributor Profitability book

OBJECTIVEPerform Inventory Reduction and Inventory Redeployment (to A & B items) and evaluate the net impact on Return on Net Assets (RONA)

DATA Current Inv $ Current Sales $ Current COGS $Total 17,470,663$ 148,265,879$ 110,902,877$

A 28% 65% 65%B 21% 18% 18%C 25% 15% 15%D 26% 2% 2%

96,372,821$ 26,687,858$ 96,372,821$ 26,687,858$22,239,882$ 2,965,318$ 22,239,882$ 2,965,318$

72,086,870$ 19,962,518$16,635,432$ 2,218,058$

14.7 5.43.8 0.5 N/A N/A

4 891 786$ 3 668 839$

Where do you want to redeploy inventory (%)

Lost Sales % due to Inventory Reduction / RedeploymentCurrent Inventory $ (by item rank)

Current COGS $ (by item rank) New Sales $ (by item rank)Expected Turns upon

RedeploymentCurrent Turns (by item rank) Lost Sales $ (by item rank)

STOCK ANALYZER ‐ INVENTORY STRATIFICATIONINVENTORY REDUCTION / REDEPLOYMENT WORKSHEET

Current Sales $ (by item rank) Current Sales $ (by item rank)Refer Current Turns

4,891,786$ 3,668,839$4,367,666$ 4,542,372$ N/A N/A Sum

N/A N/AN/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A Sum

Variable New Total Sales $ Current Total Sales $75%

Variable10%

Variable50%

Variable

Total Fixed Op. Exp

14,406,254$Current Delivery Exp

4 536 936$ 3 629 549$

New EBITDA $

148,265,879$

New Total COGS $

Current Employee Comp - Others

9,385,230$ 938,523$

Current EBITDA $Current Employee Comp -

Outside $ 7,709,826

-$

COGS $ as % of Sales $

% Inventory for Reduction

Reduced Inventory $ 74.8%

% Inventory for Redeployment

New Total Sales $Redeployed Inventory $

Redeployed Inventory $ (by item rank)

Additional Sales $ (by item rank)Inv $ available for

reduction / redeployment (by item rank)

% Inventory considered for reduction / redeployment

Total Inv $ available for reduction / New Total GM $

erating Expe

nses

9,059,045$ 6,794,284$ Other Income & Exp $

New Total Var Op.Exp

Total Variable Operating ExpCurrent Warehouse Exp New Total Op Exp $

4,477,630$ 2,238,815$ 15,246,922$

Pro

fit &

Lo

ss E

lem

en

ts

Refer Current Turns

80%

Variable75%

Interest Income %

Sum

Current DSO NewTotal A/R $

46.4 C t N t A t

1,978,468$

New Total Sales $ Fixed & Non-current Assets New Total Assets

6,153,034$

Current Total Inventory $

17,470,663$ New Total Inventory $

Reduced Inventory $

Other Current Assets

1,645,751$

Current RONA %23.57%

New RONA %

4,536,936$ 3,629,549$

Current Other Op. Exp (G&A)

Interest Income

-$12%

Ope

2,194,335$

Pro

fit &

Lo

ss E

lem

en

ts

ee

t Ele

me

nts

Refer Current Turns

32.5

# days in a year Other Current Liabilities

365 2,404,335$

New Total COGS $ Notes Payables

1,427,456$

New Total Current LiabilitiesCurrent DPO New Total A/P $

# days in a year Cash & Market. Securities

365 1,990,029$ New Net Assets $

46.4 Current Net Assets $ 32,705,777

Pro

fit &

Lo

ss E

lem

en

ts

Ba

lan

ce

Sh

ee

t Ele

me

nts

Refer Current Turns

SUPPORT SERVICES

SELLSOURCE STORE SHIPSTOCKCUSTOMERSUPPLIER

SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING

Page 3: Intensive Inventory Management Program Sales % due to Inventory Current Inventory $ ... vs. Cost Matrix Stock Group Key Performance Attendees to Present Demand Pattern Attendees to

Stratification

Lead TimeDemand During Lead Time Safety Stock

ForecastingFill Rate

Reorder Point

Replenish

IntensiveInventoryManagementProgramdealswiththeSTOCKprocessessuchasinventorystratification,forecastingandreplenishment.Inventorystratificationistheprocessofclassifyingitemsintoacertainnumberofcategoriessothatmanagingthemday-to-daydoesnotbecomeunwieldy.Theinventorystratification processisusuallynotwelldefinedorgivendueimportance,anditoftengetsover-simplified.Whenappropri-ately used, it can play a pivotal role in defining policies and procedures for other inventory management processessuchasforecastingandreplenishment.Inventorystratificationmustbedonepriortoaddressingother inventory/purchasing related processes because it acts as a sledgehammer and thereby, places the com-panyinapowerfulpositionwitharelativelyquickreturn-on-investment.Thereforeinthisprogramyouwillbe exposedtovariousInventorystratificationmethodsandtaughthowtoleveragetheseresultsforforecasting.

The program will demonstrate various forecasting methods, helping you understand the best method to useforyourbusinesssetting.Youwillgethandsonexperienceanalyzingdemandpatterns,applyingvarious forecastingmethodsandevaluatingforecasterrortochoosethebestmethod.Theprogramwillalsohelpyouunderstandtheconceptof“Whattoorder?”and“Howtoorder?”formakingreplenishmentdecisions.Handsonsessionstodecidethereorderpointandreorderquantitieswillenhanceyour decisionmakingprocessinyourbusiness.

Youwillalsohearsuccessstoriesandstepstoimplementinventorymanagementbestpracticesfrom industryexpertsfrombothbusinessandITperspectives.TheSTOCKexercisewillwalkyouthrough theprocessofconnectinginventorydecisionstoshareholdervaluethroughyourfinancialstatements. At the end of the program you will be able to assess the stock processes in your company and develop aplanofactiontoimplementbestpracticesatyourcompanyrightaway.

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

DELIVERABLESOptimizing Distributor ProfitabilityBest Practices to a Stronger Bottom Line

F. Barry Lawrence • Senthil Gunasekaran • Pradip Krishnadevarajan

“Through knowledge learned from the inventory management program, attended by all our management and key salespersons, we have reduced our total inventory levels by over 20%”

BrentA.Burns,VicePresident,ISCBuildingMaterials,LP

“Texas A&M’s research has allowed our company to continue to stay ahead of our competition and excel in customer service.”

TimMiller,VicePresident–Operations, SecurityContractorServices,Inc.

A

B

C

D

T Y P I C A L I N V E N T O R Y M I X I D E A L I N V E N T O R Y M I X

A

B

C

D

Texas A&M multi-criteria inventory stratification

REGISTER NOW!http://id.tamu.edu

DAY 1 DAY 2 DAY 3 DAY 4 DAY 5 Inventory Management WORKING SESSION: WORKING SESSION: WORKING SESSION: WORKING SESSION: Overview Inventory Stratification Forecasting Replenishment/Service Process Assessment vs. Cost Matrix Stock Group

Key Performance Attendees to Present Demand Pattern Attendees to EXERCISE: Linking Indicators and EXERCISE Results and Policies Classification Present Results Inventory Management to Shareholder Value

EXERCISE: Inventory Inventory Stratification - Replenishment Policies Debrief and Discussion Inventory Management Carrying Cost Concluding Remarks Challenges and Benefits

Inventory Stratification Forecasting EXERCISE: Inventory Buy Decision - EOQ EXERCISE: Inventory Stock Out Cost Management Recap

EXERCISE: Sample EXERCISE: Forecasting Replenishment Policies - GUEST LECTURE: Discussions and Stratification Analysis Rounds 1 & 2 Continued Inventory Management Questions Business Perspective

WORKING SESSION: Forecasting Continued EXERCISE: ROP GUEST LECTURE: Certification Presentation Data Preparation for Inventory Management Inventory Stratification IT Perspective

Discussion and Discussion and CASE STUDY: Stock Group Discussion and Questions Questions From Optimizing Questions Distributor Profitability book

OBJECTIVEPerform Inventory Reduction and Inventory Redeployment (to A & B items) and evaluate the net impact on Return on Net Assets (RONA)

DATA Current Inv $ Current Sales $ Current COGS $Total 17,470,663$ 148,265,879$ 110,902,877$

A 28% 65% 65%B 21% 18% 18%C 25% 15% 15%D 26% 2% 2%

96,372,821$ 26,687,858$ 96,372,821$ 26,687,858$22,239,882$ 2,965,318$ 22,239,882$ 2,965,318$

72,086,870$ 19,962,518$16,635,432$ 2,218,058$

14.7 5.43.8 0.5 N/A N/A

4 891 786$ 3 668 839$

Where do you want to redeploy inventory (%)

Lost Sales % due to Inventory Reduction / RedeploymentCurrent Inventory $ (by item rank)

Current COGS $ (by item rank) New Sales $ (by item rank)Expected Turns upon

RedeploymentCurrent Turns (by item rank) Lost Sales $ (by item rank)

STOCK ANALYZER ‐ INVENTORY STRATIFICATIONINVENTORY REDUCTION / REDEPLOYMENT WORKSHEET

Current Sales $ (by item rank) Current Sales $ (by item rank)Refer Current Turns

4,891,786$ 3,668,839$4,367,666$ 4,542,372$ N/A N/A Sum

N/A N/AN/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A Sum

Variable New Total Sales $ Current Total Sales $75%

Variable10%

Variable50%

Variable

Total Fixed Op. Exp

14,406,254$Current Delivery Exp

4 536 936$ 3 629 549$

New EBITDA $

148,265,879$

New Total COGS $

Current Employee Comp - Others

9,385,230$ 938,523$

Current EBITDA $Current Employee Comp -

Outside $ 7,709,826

-$

COGS $ as % of Sales $

% Inventory for Reduction

Reduced Inventory $ 74.8%

% Inventory for Redeployment

New Total Sales $Redeployed Inventory $

Redeployed Inventory $ (by item rank)

Additional Sales $ (by item rank)Inv $ available for

reduction / redeployment (by item rank)

% Inventory considered for reduction / redeployment

Total Inv $ available for reduction / New Total GM $

erating Expe

nses

9,059,045$ 6,794,284$ Other Income & Exp $

New Total Var Op.Exp

Total Variable Operating ExpCurrent Warehouse Exp New Total Op Exp $

4,477,630$ 2,238,815$ 15,246,922$

Pro

fit &

Lo

ss E

lem

en

ts

Refer Current Turns

80%

Variable75%

Interest Income %

Sum

Current DSO NewTotal A/R $

46.4 C t N t A t

1,978,468$

New Total Sales $ Fixed & Non-current Assets New Total Assets

6,153,034$

Current Total Inventory $

17,470,663$ New Total Inventory $

Reduced Inventory $

Other Current Assets

1,645,751$

Current RONA %23.57%

New RONA %

4,536,936$ 3,629,549$

Current Other Op. Exp (G&A)

Interest Income

-$12%

Ope

2,194,335$

Pro

fit &

Lo

ss E

lem

en

ts

ee

t Ele

me

nts

Refer Current Turns

32.5

# days in a year Other Current Liabilities

365 2,404,335$

New Total COGS $ Notes Payables

1,427,456$

New Total Current LiabilitiesCurrent DPO New Total A/P $

# days in a year Cash & Market. Securities

365 1,990,029$ New Net Assets $

46.4 Current Net Assets $ 32,705,777

Pro

fit &

Lo

ss E

lem

en

ts

Ba

lan

ce

Sh

ee

t Ele

me

nts

Refer Current Turns

SUPPORT SERVICES

SELLSOURCE STORE SHIPSTOCKCUSTOMERSUPPLIER

SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING

Page 4: Intensive Inventory Management Program Sales % due to Inventory Current Inventory $ ... vs. Cost Matrix Stock Group Key Performance Attendees to Present Demand Pattern Attendees to

Fermier Hall, MS 3367Texas A&M University

College Station, TX 77840-3367Phone: 979-845-4984

Fax: 979-845-4980http://id.tamu.edu

Phone: 979-845-4984 / 866-

260-2463 Fax: 979-845-4980http://readcenter.tamu.edu

Intensive Inventory Management Program

Creating Competitive Advantage Through Education

KEY TAKE-AWAYS>> Reduce obsolescence and right-size inventory investments >> Maximize your ROI on inventory while balancing customer service>> Measure forecast accuracy through focused forecasting>> Optimize safety stock investment>> Minimize total relevant cost >> Manage item-level profitability>> Effective use of IT & human resources

WHO SHOULD ATTEND?>> Inventory Planners / Coordinators>> Inventory Managers>> Purchasing Professionals>> Anybody who manages inventory in your firm

PROGRAM OUTLINE>> Inventory Stratification •Methods •Policies

>> Forecasting •Demandpatternanalysis •Methods

>> Replenishment •EOQ •Reorderpoint •Policies •ServiceVsCostMatrix

>> Performance Assessment & Benchmarks •ProcessAssessmentFramework •ProcessAssessmentWorkbook •FinancialBenchmarking - Asset Efficiency, Cash Flow, Growth, Profitability

>> Stock Analyzer •Spreadsheet-basedanalyzer •FinancialStatements •CriticalVariablesInput •FinancialMetricsOutput

>> Inventory Best Practices •ProcessDescription •Common,GoodandBestPractices •MethodologyDescription •KeyPerformanceIndicators

>> Conclusion

“We collaborated with Texas A&M on an inventory stratification project which has resulted in a successful classification of our inventory based on item level profitability. We have already seen a significant reduction in capital employed and expect to benefit from further decreases.”

KevinC.Reid, VicePresident-Procurement ThyssenKruppMaterials,N.A.

“I was impressed with the overall program at TAMU. When I look back to the program, I was impressed with the Item Stratifica- tion segmentation of Critical (A&B) Items and (C) Items.”

Randy Thomas, Regional Manager, WilsonSupply

REGISTER NOW!http://id.tamu.edu