Top Banner
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance) M. Zobov
17

INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

Jan 09, 2016

Download

Documents

gzifa

INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance). M. Zobov. Is it important?. J.Bosser et al., NIM 441 (2000) 1-8. Direct self fields. Image self fields. Wake fields. SELF FIELDS AND WAKE FIELDS. In a real accelerator, there is another important source of e.m. fields to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

INTENSITY LIMITATIONS(Space Charge and Impedance)

M. Zobov

Page 2: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

Is it important?

J.Bosser et al., NIM 441 (2000) 1-8

Page 3: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

In a real accelerator, there is another important source of e.m. fields to be considered, the beam itself, which circulating inside the pipe, producesadditional e.m. fields called "self-fields“:

Direct self fields

Image self fields

Wake fields

SELF FIELDS AND WAKE FIELDS

Page 4: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

• energy loss

• shift of the synchronous phase and frequency (tune) • shift of the betatron frequencies (tunes)

• energy spread and emittance degradation • instabilities.

These fields depend on the current and on the charges velocity.

They are responsible of many phenomena of beam dynamics:

Page 5: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

What do we mean with space charge?What do we mean with space charge?

It is net effect of the CoulombCoulomb interactions in a multi-particle system

Space Charge RegimeSpace Charge Regime ==> dominated by the self fieldself field produced by the particle distribution, which varies appreciably only over large distances compared to the average separation of the particles ==> Collective EffectsCollective Effects

Page 6: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

Example 1. Relativistic Continuous Uniform Cylindrical

oE dS dV

arfor 22 2

va

IrrE

oor

Gauss’s law

Ampere’s law

Bdl o J dS

arfor 22 2

a

IrJrB o

o

rEc

B

lrErl ro222

JlrlB o 2

J I

a2

I

a2v

a

Linear with r

L. Palumbo, JUAS

Page 7: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

Lorentz ForceLorentz Force

Fr e E r cB e 1 2 E r eE r

2

The attractive magnetic force, which becomes significant at high velocities, tends to compensate for the repulsive electric force.

• has only radialradial component

• is a linearlinear function of the transverse coordinate

)/(2 mCao 2)/()( arr o

)(

)/(

02

2

AcaJI

mAcJ

2

2

2

)()(B

2

)(

a

r

crE

cr

a

rrE

arfor

o

or

o

or

Page 8: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

Transverse Incoherent EffectsTransverse Incoherent Effects

We take the linear term of the transverse force in the betatron equation:

xx

F

mm

Fx

dt

xd

xx

FzxF

x

csx

csx

x

x

csxcs

x

0

..

00

..20

22

2

0

....

1

),(

x

F

mvvvvvvv

csx

xxxxxxx

..

020

22

2

12

The betatron shift is negative since the space charge forces are defocusing on both planes. Notice that the tune shift is in general function of “z”, therefore there is a tune spread inside the beam.

Page 9: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

Incoherent Tune ShiftThe tune shift for unbunched beams in a perfectly conducting vacuum chamber of half-height h, between perfect magnetic pole pieces at a distance g from the axis:

22222

21

302

bgh

RI

ec

r scpinc

For bunched beams we have to take into account a bunching factor B defined as the ratio of average to peak current

R

NB zbunches

22

Page 10: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

Estimates for EDM Machine

mcmbN 1011011

8/11020 BNN bunchesbuckets

P = 0.7 GeV/c = 1.0674

P = 1.5 GeV/c = 1.2804

136.08017.0 inc

0138.0800172.0 inc

! To be compared with 18.03865.0 y

Page 11: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

22ay

K

2. Optics functions change by changing the tune. This leads to the size changes, i.e. collective effects

1.

Page 12: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

F q Ezˆ z Ex vBy ̂ x Ey vBx ̂ y F//F

there can be two effects on the test chargetest charge :

1) a longitudinal force which changes its energy,

2) a transverse force which deflects its trajectory.

Wake Potentials

Page 13: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)
Page 14: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)
Page 15: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

n n nnnnoin kkgppkkpgZkZ 22222

20

21 / llmm lallmlm pJgJT

nlnmn

bnlmmlm

pppJpJpT

22222200324

Impedance of a Step (S. Kheifets and S. Heifets)

Page 16: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

2

0

20

2

2/

FWHML

npp

I

ecm

q

AF

nZ

FWHMTT RIccm

q

AFZ

0

20

2/

4

Limits on Impedances

Longitudinal

Transverse

Similar to DANE ?

The wake fields can act as a positive feedback leading to instabilities. Nonlinearities damp them (Landau damping)

Page 17: INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance)

REFERENCES

1. L. Palumbo, “Space Charge Effects and Instabilities”, JUAS, 2003.

2. M. Zobov and A. Gallo, “Instabilities”, http://www.lnf.infn.it/acceleratori/dafne/seminary/dafne_zobov.pdf

3. L. Palumbo, V. Vaccaro and M. Zobov, “Wake Fields and Impedance”, CAS CERN 95-06, 1995