Top Banner
Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist
30

Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Dec 18, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Intellectual property

Copyright law and what itmeans to a working journalist

Page 2: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Constitutional considerations

• Copyright is included in Article I, Section 8– “To promote the progress of science

and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries”

Page 3: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Constitutional considerations

• Copyright is included in Article I, Section 8– “To promote the progress of science

and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries”

• Where have we heard this before?

Page 4: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Constitutional considerations

• Copyright is included in Article I, Section 8– “To promote the progress of science

and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries”

• Where have we heard this before?

• Article 6: Free press versus fair trial

Page 5: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Purpose of copyright

• Encourage creativity for the benefit of all

Page 6: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Purpose of copyright

• Encourage creativity for the benefit of all

• Purpose is lost when copyright term is extended too far

Page 7: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Purpose of copyright

• Encourage creativity for the benefit of all

• Purpose is lost when copyright term is extended too far

• Elred v. Ashcroft upheld decades-long terms

Page 8: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

What can’t be copyrighted?

• Information and ideas, as opposed to a specific expression of those ideas

Page 9: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

What can’t be copyrighted?

• Information and ideas, as opposed to a specific expression of those ideas

• Titles

Page 10: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

What can’t be copyrighted?

• Information and ideas, as opposed to a specific expression of those ideas

• Titles

• Compilations of works with no creative value– Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone

Service Co. (1991)

Page 11: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Who holds copyright?

• Individual creator when he or she is self-employed

Page 12: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Who holds copyright?

• Individual creator when he or she is self-employed

• Client when relationship is “work for hire”

Page 13: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Who holds copyright?

• Individual creator when he or she is self-employed

• Client when relationship is “work for hire”

• Visions of online profits have tilted the balance against freelancers’ rights

Page 14: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Fair use

• Allows you to use a small part of a copyrighted work without getting permission or paying compensation

Page 15: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Fair use

• Allows you to use a small part of a copyrighted work without getting permission or paying compensation

• Especially valuable in criticism– Text excerpts– Sound clips– Song lyrics– Art shows

Page 16: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Four elements

• Purpose and character of use– Nonprofit, educational, and

“transformative” uses (such as parody) are more likely to be protected by fair use than commercial uses

Page 17: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Four elements

• Purpose and character of use

• Nature of the copyrighted work– “Expressive” works such as fiction,

poetry and music are less likely to be covered by fair use

– Unpublished works are less likely to be covered by fair use

– Out-of-print works are more likely to be covered by fair use

Page 18: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Four elements

• Purpose and character of use

• Nature of the copyrighted work

• Amount and “substantiality”– Not done by word count; based more on

whether the heart of the work was taken– Gerald Ford’s memoirs a good example

Page 19: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Four elements

• Purpose and character of use

• Nature of the copyrighted work

• Amount and “substantiality”

• Effect on market–Most important factor– If copyright holder can be shown to

have lost money, fair use is less likely to be recognized

Page 20: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Harper & Row v. Nation

• All four factors cut against The Nation

Page 21: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Harper & Row v. Nation

• All four factors cut against The Nation

• Economic effect was especially clear

Page 22: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Harper & Row v. Nation

• All four factors cut against The Nation

• Economic effect was especially clear

• A good decision? Or was journalism about a former president being punished?

Page 23: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

The “Pretty Woman” case

Roy Orbison 2 Live Crew

Page 24: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose

• Parody enjoys strong First Amendment protection

Page 25: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose

• Parody enjoys strong First Amendment protection

• Is 2 Live Crew’s remake of “Oh, Pretty Woman” “transformative”?

Page 26: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose

• Parody enjoys strong First Amendment protection

• Is 2 Live Crew’s remake of “Oh, Pretty Woman” “transformative”?

• Justice Souter says yes

Page 27: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

MGM v. Grokster

• In Sony v. Universal, the Court ruled that the VCR was legal

Page 28: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

MGM v. Grokster

• In Sony v. Universal, the Court ruled that the VCR was legal

• Napster and similar services were shut down because of massive copyright violations

Page 29: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

MGM v. Grokster

• In Sony v. Universal, the Court ruled that the VCR was legal

• Napster and similar services were shut down because of massive copyright violations

• Grokster survived for a time because it lacked a central server

Page 30: Intellectual property Copyright law and what it means to a working journalist.

MGM v. Grokster

• In Sony v. Universal, the Court ruled that the VCR was legal

• Napster and similar services were shut down because of massive copyright violations

• Grokster survived for a time because it lacked a central server

• Lost because of “inducement theory”