INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop February 26, 2013 Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security
Jan 13, 2016
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENTDecision Maker Workshop
February 26, 2013
Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security
Agenda
1. Authorities2. Integrated Risk Management Overview 3. Risk/Capability/Gap Formula4. Risks5. Capabilities6. Gaps7. Recommended Actions
Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security (FCEM&HS) is authorized under Chapter 5502 of the Ohio Revised Code and organized under the 1988 Countywide Agreement to coordinate countywide all-hazards emergency management and disaster preparedness functions for the 42 local government jurisdictions of Franklin County.
•“…are designed or undertaken to minimize the effects upon the civilian population caused or that could be caused by any hazard and that are necessary to address mitigation, emergency preparedness, response, and recovery.”
3
FCEM&HS Emergency Management Authority
4
FCEM&HS Core Competencies Ohio Revised Code:5502.21 – 5502.51
• Warning Systems: “The control and use of emergency communications, lighting, and warning equipment and systems.”
• Emergency Operations Center: “The development and construction of emergency operations centers for the conduct and support of coordination, direction, and control activities.”
• Resources: “The development of resource initiatives.”
• Recovery: “All activities required and necessary to return an area to its former condition to the extent possible following the occurrence of any hazard.”
5
FCEM&HS Core Competencies Ohio Revised Code:5502.21 – 5502.51 • Planning: “The development of an all-hazards emergency
operations plan that has been coordinated with all agencies, boards, and divisions having emergency management functions.”
• Training: “The recruitment, retention, and training of personnel.”
• Exercises: “The preparation and conduct of an annual exercise of the all-hazards emergency operations plan.”
• Citizen Preparedness: “Activities that may be necessary for survival and the overall health, safety, and welfare of the civilian population.”
• Grants: Administration of SHSP, EMPG, Citizen Corp, HMEP, PUCO.
• In 2009, FCEM&HS changed the Homeland Security paradigm for Franklin County by implementing a risk-based approach to better prepare for, respond to and recover from all-hazards.
• This innovative, risk-based approach resulted in a partnership between FCEM&HS, Ohio EMA and policy makers from Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
• FCEM&HS was selected by DHS as a pilot program to develop an Integrated Risk Management philosophy and program.
6
Integrated Risk Management (IRM)
Integrated Risk Management (IRM)
• Taking a risk-based approach, assessing our capabilities, and identifying our gaps, is instrumental in our ability to shape the emergency management and homeland security strategic planning and policy-making process.
• Integrated Risk Management is a process to fuse, unify, and inform the Homeland Security Enterprise.
• You are all a strategic part of the Homeland Security Enterprise.
7
Fire
Non-Profits EMA NGOs
LE
Federal
HealthDecisionMakers
PrivateSectorCEOs
State
Citizens
“Silo-ed” Approach
Integrated Approach
Fire
EMA
LE
PrivateSectorCEOs
Citizens
Health
DecisionMakers
State
FederalLocalJurisdictions
State andFederal Partners
NGOsNon-Profits
EmergencyPartners
Homeland Security Enterprise
• Homeland Security Enterprise (HSE) is a “whole community” approach.
• Utilizes partnerships among emergency management, law enforcement, public health, local/state/federal government, private sector, nongovernmental organizations, faith-based & community-based organizations, and the public.
• Federal guidance focus is on all-hazards preparedness; local HSE partners must share info regardless of threat or hazard, man-made or natural.
• Foundation of IRM is understanding the Risk Capabilities Gaps Decision-Making process.
FCEM&HS
Communication & Coordination• Participation by Decision Makers in the
Homeland Security Enterprise is key to fully realizing integrated risk management.
Decision Maker Education and Engagement
Homeland Security Enterprise
11
Risk/Capability/GapFormula
Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding
Priorities
Franklin CountyThreat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA)
Franklin County Core Capability Assessment
Franklin County Gap Analysis
CapabilitiesRisk Results
Decision Maker Review & Updates
GapsCapabilitiesRisk RecommendedActions
Resource Allocation,Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding
Priorities
Gaps
Integrated Risk Management Components
13
Risk Process
• Develop likely, worse-case scenarios
• Identify risk factors
• Weight risk factors
• Score risks
• Update Risk Assessment based on new methodology and scoring risks
2010 Risks• Flooding• Severe Winter Weather• Dam Failure• Terrorism• Infectious Disease• Tornadoes• Severe Summer Weather• Extreme Heat• Hazardous Materials Incidents• Drought• Utility Interruptions or Failures• Invasive Species• Air and Water Pollution/Contamination• Transportation Accident – Aircraft• Civil Disturbance• Earthquake
• Tornadoes• Dam Failure• Flooding• WMD Terrorist Incident• Cyber-Terrorism • Infectious Disease • Severe Winter Weather • Hazardous Material Incident• Transportation Accident - Aircraft• Severe Summer Weather• Utility Interruptions or Failures • Civil Disturbance • Lone-Wolf Terrorist • Air and Water Pollution/ Contamination• Extreme Heat • Drought• Invasive Species • Earthquakes
2013 Risks
Risk Results
Risk scoring process can be found in the Risk Assessment Executive Summary & Methodology (Tab 4)
Risk scoring process can be found in the Risk Assessment Executive Summary & Methodology (Tab 4)
15
Capability Process
• Identify priority Core Capabilities based on scenarios
• Develop Capability Assessment Survey based on the Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA)
• Assess Capability current levels with preparedness goals
• Identify “Top 13” Capabilities based on survey results
THIRA can be found in Tab 5 & Survey Results in Tab 6
THIRA can be found in Tab 5 & Survey Results in Tab 6
PREVENT PROTECT MITIGATE RESPONDPlanning
Public Information and Warning
Operational Coordination
Intelligence and Information Sharing
Planning
Public Information and Warning
Operational Coordination
Cybersecurity
Intelligence and Information Sharing
Planning
Public Information and Warning
Operational Coordination
Threats and Hazard Identification
Planning
Public Information and Warning
Operational Coordination
Critical Transportation
Environmental Response / Health and Safety
Infrastructure Systems
Mass Care Services
Mass Search and Rescue Operations
On-Scene Security and Protection
Operational Communications
Public and Private Services and Resources
Public Health and Medical Services
Situational Assessment
Planning
Public Information and Warning
Operational Coordination
Infrastructure Systems
Forensics and Attribution
Interdiction and Disruption
Screening, Search, and Detection
Access Control and Identity Verification
Interdiction and Disruption
Physical Protective Measures
Risk Management for Protection Programs
and ActivitiesScreening, Search, and
DetectionSupply Chain Integrity
and Security
Community Resilience
Long-Term Vulnerability Reduction
Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment
Fatality Management Services
Economic Recovery
Health and Social Services
Housing
Natural and Cultural Resources
RECOVER
Priority Core Capabilities
17
Capability Assessment Results
Core CapabilitiesPriority Sequence
“Top 13”1—Public Information & Warning2—Operational Coordination3—Planning4—Mass Care Services5—Critical Transportation6—Infrastructure Systems7—Cybersecurity8—On-scene Security & Protection9—Mass Search & Rescue Operations10—Operational Communications11—Environmental Response/Health & Safety12—Public Health & Medical Services13—Intelligence & Information Sharing
Capability Prioritization process can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)
Capability Prioritization process can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)
18
Gap Process
• Use Capability Assessment to identify Gaps
• Prioritize to ensure the higher priority Gaps are accurately identified
• Identify Solution Areas to determine ways to close the Gaps
• Finalize with written Gap Analysis
Gaps Analysis Results
19
Core Capability Corresponding Gap Closures
Public Information & Warning
Continue outreach with elected officials and various organizations to ensure there are programs to support and provide prompt and accurate information to the public, including people with functional needs.
Operational Coordination
Assign Corrective Actions from the After Action Report/Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) to the appropriate department or agency and encourage departments to follow through with Improvement Plans and ensure Corrective Actions are completed.
PlanningContinue to encourage, educate and generate more involvement and support from elected officials.
Mass CareServices
Provide cross-training of staff for emergency partners to ensure backup positions are prepared and trained to handle additional responsibilities.
CriticalTransportation
Effectively implement mutual aid assistance agreements and compacts.
Infrastructure SystemsEncourage training for chief executives and other key officials in Franklin County and from local jurisdictions to participate in the Homeland Security Enterprise.
Cybersecurity
Build organizational structures and relationships, establish coordination linkages, and develop and implement training programs to enhance Cybersecurity among the whole community in Franklin County.
Entire Gap Closure list can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)
Entire Gap Closure list can be found in the Gap Analysis (Tab 7)
20
Recommended Actions
• Implement an Annual Decision Maker meeting to review IRM progress and continue to encourage, educate and generate more involvement and support from elected officials
• Continuation of training and multi-discipline, regional exercises
• Maintain organizational structures and current working groups to ensure emergency management and homeland security partners continue to collaborate despite declining grant funding
• Develop a Cybersecurity Workgroup to build organizational structures and relationships among the whole community in Franklin County
Decision Maker Education and Engagement
Homeland Security Enterprise
21
Risk/Capability/GapFormula
Resource Allocation, Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding
Priorities
Franklin CountyThreat Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA)
Franklin County Core Capability Assessment
Franklin County Gap Analysis
CapabilitiesRisk Results
Decision Maker Review & Updates
GapsCapabilitiesRisk RecommendedActions
Resource Allocation,Planning, Training, Exercises, Funding
Priorities
Gaps
QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION
Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security