Top Banner
Southern California Water Dialogue February 24, 2021
26

Integrated Resources Plan

Apr 05, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Integrated Resources Plan

2020 INTEGRATED RESOURCES PLAN

Southern California Water DialogueFebruary 24, 2021

Page 2: Integrated Resources Plan

Presentation Overview

Integrated Resources Plan

History of the IRP Scenario Planning IRP Progress & Schedule

Page 3: Integrated Resources Plan

Integrated Resources Plan (IRP)

• Blueprint for Southern California water reliability• Long-term strategy adapting to changing conditions• Diversified resource portfolio

Imported Water

Transfers/ Exchanges

StorageGround Water

Recovery

Recycling

Conservation

Page 4: Integrated Resources Plan

1996 2004 2010 2015

History of the IRP1987 – 1992

DroughtColorado River

CutbacksSWP

Restrictions Recession & Drought

Page 5: Integrated Resources Plan

Potable Water Demand Stable Despite Growth

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Mill

ion

Acr

e-Fe

et/M

illio

n Pe

ople

Calendar Year

Metropolitan Service Area Population

Potable Consumptive Water Demand

Page 6: Integrated Resources Plan

The Future Is Not Predictable

?

FUTURETODAY

Page 7: Integrated Resources Plan

Scenario Planning Approach To Examine A Range of Plausible Futures

FUTURETODAY

Page 8: Integrated Resources Plan

2020 IRP Roadmap

Identify Drivers of Change

Construct Learning Scenarios

Develop Resource Mix

Adaptive Management Strategy

Page 9: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of ChangeIdentify Drivers of Change

Page 10: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of ChangeIdentify Drivers of Change

Climate Change

Politics and Regulations

Technological Advances

Economy and Demographics

• Sea level rise• Rainfall• Rising temperatures• Recession or economic upturn• Public’s willingness to pay• Population growth• New technologies• Stormwater expansion• Emerging contaminants• Delta issues

Page 11: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 12: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 13: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 14: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 15: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 1: Drivers of Change Survey ResultsTop 5 Survey rankings by cohort based on percentage of responses that were Extremely or Very Important

Board Members %

Colorado River Cooperation 95%

Hydrologic Variations 90%

Stress on River Basins 90%

Emerging Regulations 86%

Direct Potable Reuse 76%

Outages and Disasters 76%

Member Agencies %

Colorado River Cooperation 91%

Emerging Regulations 87%

Direct Potable Reuse 83%

Hydrologic Variations 83%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Stakeholders %

Hydrologic Variations 92%

Outages and Disasters 87%

Stress on River Basins 84%

Direct Potable Reuse 81%

Groundwater Contamination 78%

Page 16: Integrated Resources Plan

Step 2: Construct Scenarios & Refine AnalysisCreated a supply – demand framework

Less Imported Supply Stability

Lower Demand on Metropolitan

Higher Demand on Metropolitan

Low Demand

Stable Imports

High DemandStable Imports

High DemandReduced Imports

A B

Low Demand Reduced ImportsC D

Greater Imported Supply Stability

Page 17: Integrated Resources Plan

High DemandReduced Imports D

Step 2: Construct Scenarios & Refine AnalysisWorking assumptions for each Scenario

Low Demand

Stable Imports

A High DemandStable Imports

B

Low Demand Reduced ImportsC

• Slower growing economy

• Least additional supply needed

• Fewest local supply projects included

• Gradual climate impacts/fewer regulatory requirements

• Faster growing economy

• Additional supply needed for growing demands

• Additional local supply projects

• Gradual climate impacts/fewer regulatory requirements

• Slower growing economy

• Additional supply needed for loss of imported supply

• Additional local supply projects; prioritize projects with least investment needed

• Severe climate impacts/higher regulatory requirements

• Faster growing economy

• Most additional supply needed for growing demands and loss of imported supply

• Most local supply projects included

• Severe climate impacts/higher regulatory requirements

Page 18: Integrated Resources Plan

Low Demand

Stable Imports

A High DemandStable Imports

B Low Demand Reduced ImportsC

High DemandReduced Imports D

Common Actions: Form the Basis for the 2020 IRP

Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions

Step 3: Develop A Resource MixIdentify Actions and Targets to Achieve Reliability

Page 19: Integrated Resources Plan

Low Demand

Stable Imports

A High DemandStable Imports

B Low Demand Reduced ImportsC

High DemandReduced Imports D

Unique Actions: Basis for the Adaptive Management Plan

Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions Actions

Step 4: Adaptive Management StrategyIdentify Signposts to Inform Policy Decision Makers

Page 20: Integrated Resources Plan

IRP Plan through April

Member Agencyinput

Consultation with Experts

Modeling for Gap Analysis

Refine Scenario Assumptions and Gap Analysis

Board Policy Discussions

Research and Confirmation

Page 21: Integrated Resources Plan

Scenario Assumption Refinements

Demands Imported Supply Local Supply

• Colorado River• State Water Project

• Groundwater• Recycled Water• Seawater Desalination• Surface Water• Los Angeles Aqueduct

Key Areas

Page 22: Integrated Resources Plan

Demand Refinements

• Member Agency Feedback• Feedback received through various forums

• Qualitative/Quantitative Assessment• Workshops and other meetings

• Engage with Demand Experts• Share feedback and pose questions to experts• Receive preliminary assessment of scenarios and input on issues raised

• Workshop with Board, Member Agencies, and Experts• Opportunity to review expert input and ask questions in March 2021

Page 23: Integrated Resources Plan

Imported Water Supply Refinements

• Member Agency Feedback• Feedback received through various forums

• Qualitative/Quantitative Assessment• Workshops and other meetings

• Engage with Climate Experts• Share feedback and pose questions to experts• Receive preliminary assessment of scenarios and input on issues raised

• Workshop with Board, Member Agencies, and Experts• Opportunity to review expert input and ask questions in April 2021

Page 24: Integrated Resources Plan

Local Supply Refinements

• Engage member agencies about local supplies through 4 separate yet concurrent tracks

• Engage with Climate Experts

Local Supplies

Groundwater Surface Water Los Angeles Aqueduct Local Projects

Page 25: Integrated Resources Plan

Tentative Schedule

STEP 2Refine

Scenarios

Jan - Apr 2021

STEP 3Develop

Resource Mix

Mar-Jun2021

STEP 4Adaptive

Management

May- Aug 2021

Adopt IRP Report

Sep 2021

Page 26: Integrated Resources Plan