Marine Policy and Regional Coordination Section Section de Politique Maritime et de la Coordination Régionale Sección de Política Marítima y de Coordinación Regional Mорская политика и Pегиональная координация Alejandro Iglesias-Campos Julian Barbière 7 September 2015, Cancún (MX) Latin American and Caribbean Large Marine Ecosystems Integrated Coastal Area Management, including Marine Spatial Planning and Large Marine Ecosystems
31
Embed
Integrated Coastal Area Management, including Marine … · 2015-09-17 · Marine Ecosystems and their coasts by generating knowledge, building capacity, ... Sectorial and integrated
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Marine Policy and Regional Coordination SectionSection de Politique Maritime et de la Coordination Régionale
Sección de Política Marítima y de Coordinación Regional
Mорская политика и Pегиональная координация
Alejandro Iglesias-Campos
Julian Barbière
7 September 2015, Cancún (MX)
Latin American and Caribbean
Large Marine Ecosystems
Integrated Coastal Area
Management, including Marine
Spatial Planning and Large
Marine Ecosystems
Marine Policy and Regional
Coordination Section
3
Coordination of
IOC’s external
policy/science,
communication and
multi-agency partnership
Regional coordination
Development and
dissemination of
Coastal and Marine
Management Tools
(ICAM, MSP, LME)
3
ICAM
MSP
Improve institutional coordination.
Empower all stakeholders
(multi-sector approach)
Protection of the special coastal and marine ecosystems, landscapes and cultural heritage.
Enhance the compatibility
between development
and conservation.
Increasing public awareness and training.
Achieve a sustainable management towards sustainbleblue growth
In support of ecosystem-based policy
development
In support of ecosystem-based policy
development
National Atlases
Regional atlas and indicators
Cap
acit
y b
uild
ing Regional Indicators
-Population
-Coastal water quality
-Biodiversity
-Coastal management plans
Networking & Cooperation
www.atlasspincam.net
Proyecto SPINCAMRed de Información y Datos del Pacífico Sur en apoyo a la Gestión Integrada de Áreas Costeras
Indicators:
1) POPULATION DYNAMICS
a. Floating population (Tourism)
b. Migrations
2) EFFICIENCY ON TRADITIONAL
FISHERIES SUSTAINABILITY
a. Fisheries effort and Food security
b. Traditional fisheries landings
c. Fishing technics
3) COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURES
a. Aquaculture
b. Sea ports and port’s infrastructures
c. Tourist infrastructures
4) KEY COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS
a. Mangroves
b. Coastal wetlands
c. Other ecosystems with regional interest
5) COASTAL ECONOMY
a. Employment / Unemployment (Sectorial)
b. Level of (public/private) investments
c. GINI Coefficient
6) COASTAL VULNERABILITY
a. Population affected by meteo-marine events
b. Climate change effects (El Niño/La Niña)
c. Erosion
Proyecto SPINCAMRed de Información y Datos del Pacífico Sur en apoyo a la Gestión Integrada de Áreas Costeras
Proyecto SPINCAMRed de Información y Datos del Pacífico Sur en apoyo a la Gestión Integrada de Áreas Costeras
www.atlasspincam.net
Proyecto SPINCAMRed de Información y Datos del Pacífico Sur en apoyo a la Gestión Integrada de Áreas Costeras
www.atlasspincam.net
Local Case
Studies
Algarrobo,
Chile
Guapi,
Colombia
Churute,
Ecuador
Las Perlas,
Panamá
Piura/Sechura,
Perú
• Potential beneficiaries
– Argentina
– Brazil
– Chile
– Colombia
– Costa Rica
– Ecuador
– El Salvador
– Guatemala
GEF ICAM Proposal
– Honduras
– México
– Nicaragua
– Panamá
– Perú
– Uruguay
– Venezuela
10
• GOVERNANCE: Reinforce the consensus amongst participant countries on the strategies and approaches to identify coastal risks and vulnerabilities to define common regional strategies by using relevant pilot case studies at local level / demonstration sites (e.g. PEMSEA)
• NETWORKS: Create a network through projects and programmes at national/local and transboundary scale to implement the ecosystem-based approach to coastal and marine environments in the region (Demo sites).
GEF ICAM – Main components
11
• SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY: Increase the links and synergies on the implementation of the methodological concepts of ICAM and MSP at local and provincial level.
• TRAINING: Reduce disparities between countries regarding the capacity to ensure the sustainable development of their coasts.
• COMMUNICATION: Develop communication strategies to facilitate public participation in the project implementation and their involvement in the processes of coastal and marine management in their respective countries.
GEF ICAM – Main components
12
• Support to countries and stakeholders in the formulation of a multiscalar policy framework and planning management of the coastal and marine environment through:
1) Implementation of ICAM and MSP demo sites (local/subnat.)
2) Development of information systems and tools to support decision making
3) Development of indicators for monitoring
4) Development of local/national strategies
GEF ICAM – Expected results
13
Large Marine Ecosystem
“Natural regions of coastal ocean
space encompassing waters from
river basins and estuaries to the
seaward boundaries of continental
shelves and margins of coastal
currents and water masses”
Dr. Kenneth Sherman (NOAA 1994)
14
Large Marine Ecosystem
LMEs cover 200,000 km2 or more and their natural boundaries are
based on four ecological criteria: bathymetry, hydrography, productivity,
and trophically-related populations (Kenneth Sherman (NOAA 1994). 15
GEF funded project
Implementation: April 2013 to March 2015
Objectives:
1. A global baseline assessment of the
status and changing condition of
transboundary water systems resulting
from human and natural causes, which
will allow the GEF, policy makers and
international organizations to set science-
based priorities for financial resource
allocation and
2. The institutional arrangements for
conducting periodic future assessments
of transboundary water systems to allow
the GEF and others to track the results of
their interventions.
1616
Productivity Fisheries Pollution and Health Socio-economics Governance
1. Chlorophyl a
2. Primary
productivity
3. Sea surface
temperature
1. Annual catch
2. Catch value
3. Marine trophic index
4. Fishing in balance
index
5. Stock status
6. Catch from bottom
impacting gear
7. Fishing effort
1. Nutrients (N,P,Si)
2. Coastal Eutrophication
Potential
3. POPs in plastic pellets
4. Plastic debris density
5. Change in MPA coverage
6. Reefs at Risk Index
7. Mangrove extent
8. Coral reef extent
9. Cumulative human
impacts
10.Delta Vulnerability index
1. % GDP fisheries
2. %GDP international
tourism
3. Population within 10m
coastal elevation
4. Human development
Index
5. Deaths caused by climate
related natural disasters
1. Governance
architecture
Data
Indicators
Reports
Web
17
• While the principal target audience is the GEF, other potential
users of the TWAP results include the World Ocean Assessment
(WOA) and Regional Seas Programmes,
• Data will be available to users of the assessment results through
websites, spatial data infrastructure and reports,
• The indicators and baselines may be relevant to environmental
assessment and planning at LME, Regional Seas and other
scales,
• It can facilitate incorporation of transboundary considerations
into WOA, Regional Seas, etc.
Target
audience
18
19
ISO Metadata document
Data download (*.zip)
21
• Partners:
• Objective:
– To improve global ecosystem-based governance of Large
Marine Ecosystems and their coasts by generating
knowledge, building capacity, harnessing public and
private partners, and supporting south-to-south and
north-to-south learning.
GEF Project LME:Learn
22
Primary objectives
• Global and regional network of partners to
enhance ecosystem-based management
and to provide support for the GEF
LME/ICM/MPA projects to address their
needs and incorporate climate variability and
change.
• Synthesis and incorporation of knowledge
into policy-making, capture of best LME
governance practices, and development
of new methods and tools to enhance the
effective management of LMEs and to
incorporate ICM, MPAs and climate
variability and change.
23
• Capacity and partnership building through twinning and learning
exchanges, workshops, and training among LMEs and similar
initiatives (e.g., Seascapes).
• Communication, dissemination and outreach of GEF
LME/ICM/MPA project achievements and lessons learned.
Primary objectives
24
1. Concepts, methodologies and
best practices on Integrated Coastal
area Management.
2. Methods and strategies for
sustainable management.
3. Methodologies for evaluation of
Coastal ecosystem goods and
services.
4. Coastal physical characterization,
impact assessment and natural
risks (including climate change).
5. Approaches to coastal hazards
mitigation
6. Ecosystem-based adaptation to
address climate change impacts in
the coast
6. Socio-economic analysis and
coastal human impacts.
7. Elaboration of recommendations
and actions plans for ICAM.
Development and use of ecological, socio-economic and governance indicators to support coastal management/MSP processes
Methodologies for the conduct of integrated marine assessments
Coastal and marine protected areas’ management and planning