Integrated Annual Work Plan & Budget (AWP&B) 2017-18

Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke Liye Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad

Integrated Annual Work Plan& Budget (AWP&B)

2017-18

State Project Office, RMSA UttarakhandNanoorkhera, Tapovan Marg, Dehradun (Uttarakhand)

Website: http://rmsa.uk.gov.in/, E-mail: [email protected]

Planning Team, Uttarakhand

Mr. Deependra Kumar Chaudhari (IAS)Mrs. Shashi ChaudharyMrs. Amita JoshiMr. H.P. VishwakarmaMrs. Manju BhartiMr. Avnindra BarthwalDr. S.S. MajilaMr. Sanjeev JoshiMr. Vinod Kumar Khali

State Project Director, RMSAAdditional SPD, RMSAFinance Controller, RMSAJoint SPD, RMSAJoint SPD, RMSAAstt. SPD, Innovation, RMSAAstt. SPD, Academic, RMSAAstt. SPD, MIS, RMSAAstt. Account Officer, RMSASupportMr. Sanjay BhattEr. S.M.S. RawatMr. B.M.S. Rawat

Administrative Officer, RMSAExecutive Engineer, RMSAAccountant, RMSAComputerisationMr. Sumit TiwariMr. Mahendra KumarMrs. Geeta RawatMr. Yashwant Singh

Computer OperatorComputer OperatorComputer OperatorComputer Operator

Acknowledgment

The Integrated Annual plan of Uttarakhand for Rashtriya Madhyamik ShikshaAbhiyan, IEDSS, ICT@School, Girls Hostel & Vocational Education prepared after a longseries of workshop with District Officials, SCERT, SIEMAT, Board and Educationists.The U-DISE data entry done through U-DISE software at district level and the analysisof U-DISE data done at State level as well as at district level. Each and every secondaryschool is recorded under U-DISE.The RMSA Team of Uttarakhand has benefited from the guidance and help of anumber of people with great conviction in quality education, Officers, Consultants,Experts and Resource Persons. Herein we place on record our sincere thanks to thesupport of all those persons.MHRD’s guidelines have been very helpful to the RMSA team of Uttarakhand. Weare greatly indebted to Mr. Anil Swaroop, Secretary MHRD, School Education andLiteracy, Mr. Manish Garg, Joint Secretary, Mrs. Nigar Fatima Husain, Director, RMSA,other Directors and Officials of GOI and Consultant, TSG for their valuable guidance andsupport.We are grateful to Mr. R. Ramaswamy, Chief Secretary who encouraged theSchool Education Department to meticulously prepare the Uttarakhand IntegratedAnnual Plan based on authentic U-DISE data 2016-17. We are greatly indebted toDr. Ranbeer Singh, Additional Chief Secretary, School Education, Govt. of Uttarakhandwho consistently evinced keen interest in the development of the Framework and gavevaluable suggestions for accelerating the planning process.The present Integrated Annual plan of Uttarakhand for expanding SecondaryEducation in the state is an outcome of a series of workshops involving StateEducational Administrators and District officers led by Mr. Deependra KumarChaudhari, IAS, State Project Director, RMSA, Uttarakhand at the State level. We recordour thanks for their guidance and to the support of SIEMAT & SCERT, Education BoardUttarakhand, SPO (SSA) Uttarakhand, DIET faculty members and HeadMasters/Principals in identifying quality interventions in Secondary Education.We are grateful to national experts from MHRD, Ed.CIL & NUEPA, who guidedthe State RMSA team to evolve district level plans for universalisation of SecondaryEducation in the state. We also thank Mr. R.K. Kunwar, Director, Secondary EducationUttarakhand, Mrs. Seema Jaunsari, Director, Elementary Education and Director,Academic, Research & Training for their contribution in the preparatory phases.

RMSA TeamUttarakhand

Contents

Chapter Particulars Page No.1. State Profile 1 – 122. Implementation Status 13 – 543. Sector Diagnosis - Current Status, Challenges andPriorities 55 – 814. Planning Process 82 – 885. Access 89 – 936. Equity and Social Inclusion 94 – 987. Inclusive Education for Children with Special Needs 99 – 1088. Quality Improvement 109 – 1319. Vocationalisation 132 – 14110. School Infrastructure and Strengthening of Secondaryand Higher Secondary Education 142 – 14811. Community Participation, Mobilisation and SMDCPlanning for Implementation 149 – 15112. Financial Management and Budget Estimates 152 – 159

Chapter - 1 : State Profile

( 1 )

Chapter - 1State Profile

1.1 IntroductionEducation is an indicator of sustain growth and development of a nation. It hasimportant role to play in the full development of one’s personality. According to Census 2011,the total literacy rate in India is 74.04% the female literacy rate is 65.46%. The gap betweenrural and urban literacy rate is also very significant in India. This is evident from the fact thatonly 59.18% of the rural population are literate against 75.69% urban population. TheGovernment of India has put forward initiatives for achieving the goal of cent percent literacyby launching various schemes and by making constitutional amendments. The Government ofIndia has also introduced Right to Education Bill 2005 for the protection of rights and bettereducational access to all children.The elementary education in India is the foundation on which development of everycitizen and nation as a whole hinges. The 86th constitutional amendment has made elementaryeducation of fundamental rights to the children between the age group of 6-14. Since,universalization of elementary education has become a constitutional mandate it is absolutelyessential to push this vision forward to move towards universalization of secondary educationwhich has already being achieved in large number of develop countries and several developingcountries, in India education beyond elementary level is lagging behind. Therefore, educationbeyond elementary is instrumental.Secondary education is a crucial stage in the education hierarchy as its prepare thestudents for higher education and also for the world of work. It is absolutely essential tostrengthen this stage by providing greater access and also by improving quality in a significantway. The Government of India while taking note of the development in economy andeducational scenario all over the world and in its own country has proposed for expansion andstrengthening of the secondary and higher secondary education. It has launched RashtriyaMadhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan in 2007 for promoting universalization of secondary education.The normal age group of the children in secondary classes is 14-16 whereas it is 16-18 forhigher secondary classes. The population of the age group 14-18 was 8.55 crore in 2001 as percensus data. The estimated population of age group as on 1.3.2005 was 9.48 crore which islikely to increase 9.69 crore as on 1.3.2007 i.e. at the beginning of 11th Five Year Plan. Thislikely to established at around 9.70 crore for 2011. On viewing this established population ofthis age group it is necessary and desirable that access to secondary education should beuniversalized leading to enhanced participation and quality improvement. Moreover beside thegeneral education upto secondary level opportunity for improvement of vocational knowledgeand skill should be provided at the higher secondary level to enable students to be employable.1.2 Background of UttarakhandThe State of Uttarakhand came to existence on November 09, 2000. The state waspreviously known as “Uttaranchal” but was renamed “Uttarakhand” on January 01, 2007. It isbound by Uttar Pradesh on the south, Nepal on the east, Himanchal Pradesh on the west andChina on north-east. Geographical area of the state is 53483sq. km. forming 1.69% of area ofthe country as a whole.Geographically, Uttarakhand is situated in the central Himalayan zone. It extendsbetween 77° 34’ to 81° 02’ E longitude and 28° 43’ to 31° 27’ N latitude. The topography ofUttarakhand is characterized by hilly terrain, rugged and rocky mountains, deep valleys, highpeaks, sharp streams and rivulets, rapid soil erosion, frequent landslides and widely scatteredhabitations. The natural vegetation is mixed broad-leaved forest with oak and pinepredominating. Climate varies from subtropical in the valleys to temperate on the higher


( 2 )

slopes with a summer monsoon. The temperature range from 16°C to 40°C but drops belowfreezing point in many parts of high mountain areas of the region during winter.Administratively, the state has following constitution:Administrative Units of the State

02 Administrative divisions 13 Districts 78 Tehsils 95 Development Blocks 41 Cities 116 Towns

670 Nyaya panchayats 7956 Gram panchayats 16793 revenue villages 15747 inhabited villages and 1048 unhabitated villages

Source: Department of Panchayat, Government of Uttarakhand and district annual work planThe Population of the state is 1,01,16,752 according to census of 2011 and an averagedensity of 189 person/sq.km. in year 2011. The overall sex ratio in Uttarakhand is 963 femaleper 1000 male. The highest sex ratio is in District Almora i.e. 1142 and lowest is in Haridwari.e. 879. Population density in the 13 districts of the State varies from a high of 817 per sq. km.in Haridwar to a low of 41 per sq. km. in Uttarkashi. Different districts also recorded diversepopulation growth rates during the decade 2001-2011, from a strong 33.40% in Udham SinghNagar to practical stagnation at -1.73% in Almora. As per census 2001 the SC comprises of18.01% and ST of 2.09% in the whole population. The main tribes of Uttarakhand are Bhotia,Jaunsari, Bouksa and Tharu. They are mainly resite in Pithoragarh, Dehradun, Nainital andUdhamsingh nager.Population figures at a glance

S.No Description 2001 20111 Population Male 43.26 Lakhs 51.54 LakhsFemale 41.63 Lakhs 49.62 LakhsTotal 84.89 Lakhs 101.16 Lakhs2 Population Density 159 Per sq.km 189 Per sq.km3 Sex Ratio 964 9634 Decadal Population Growth 16.27 Lakhs (absolute)/19.17%Source: Census 2011

Table 1.3 DISTRICT-WISE POPULATION AS PER CENSUS 2001

Sl.No. District Area

Population according to Census 2001All Communities Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes

Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 Almora Rural 263,128 312,934 576,062 63,190 68,940 132,130 255 233 488Urban 30,720 23,785 54,505 4,354 3,946 8,300 206 184 390Total 293,848 336,719 630,567 67,544 72,886 140,430 461 417 8782 Bageshwar Rural 114,199 127,460 241,659 30,984 31,941 62,925 746 873 1,619Urban 4,311 3,492 7,803 825 774 1,599 153 171 324Total 118,510 130,952 249,462 31,809 32,715 64,524 899 1,044 1,9433 Chamoli Rural 154,197 165,459 319,656 29,338 29,677 59,015 3,688 4,042 7,730Urban 29,548 21,155 50,703 4,653 3,871 8,524 1,395 1,359 2,754Total 183,745 186,614 370,359 33,991 33,548 67,539 5,083 5,401 10,4844 Champawat Rural 92,816 97,948 190,764 16,882 16,687 33,569 296 277 573Urban 18,268 15,510 33,778 2,409 2,120 4,529 89 78 167Total 111,084 113,458 224,542 19,291 18,807 38,098 385 355 7405 Dehradun Rural 315,305 288,096 603,401 48,843 43,190 92,033 49,435 45,475 94,910Urban 364,278 314,464 678,742 43,082 38,333 81,415 2,487 1,932 4,419Total 679,583 602,560 1,282,143 91,925 81,523 173,448 51,922 47,407 99,329


( 3 )

Sl.No. District Area

Population according to Census 2001All Communities Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes

Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

6 Garhwal Rural 281,706 325,497 607,203 47,201 49,516 96,717 744 604 1,348Urban 49,355 40,520 89,875 5,327 4,609 9,936 144 102 246Total 331,061 366,017 697,078 52,528 54,125 106,653 888 706 1,5947 Hardwar Rural 534,038 466,874 1,000,912 139,337 121,125 260,462 1,628 1,330 2,958Urban 241,983 204,292 446,275 28,365 25,149 53,514 100 81 181Total 776,021 671,166 1,447,187 167,702 146,274 313,976 1,728 1,411 3,1398 Nainital Rural 256,956 236,903 493,859 61,064 54,867 115,931 2,054 1,908 3,962Urban 143,298 125,752 269,050 16,874 15,379 32,253 514 485 999Total 400,254 362,655 762,909 77,938 70,246 148,184 2,568 2,393 4,9619 Pithoragarh Rural 194,810 207,646 402,456 49,118 48,949 98,067 7,341 7,593 14,934Urban 32,805 27,028 59,833 4,383 3,999 8,382 2,081 2,264 4,345Total 227,615 234,674 462,289 53,501 52,948 106,449 9,422 9,857 19,279

10 Rudraprayag Rural 105,643 119,064 224,707 19,778 20,237 40,015 87 70 157Urban 1,892 840 2,732 189 107 296 19 10 29Total 107,535 119,904 227,439 19,967 20,344 40,311 106 80 18611 Tehri Garhwal Rural 258,401 286,500 544,901 40,698 41,346 82,044 169 104 273Urban 36,767 23,079 59,846 2,970 2,311 5,281 348 70 418Total 295,168 309,579 604,747 43,668 43,657 87,325 517 174 69112 Udham SinghNagar Rural 434,654 397,946 832,600 63,118 55,948 119,066 55,081 53,727 108,808Urban 214,830 188,184 403,014 23,499 20,217 43,716 860 552 1,412Total 649,484 586,130 1,235,614 86,617 76,165 162,782 55,941 54,279 110,22013 Uttarkashi Rural 138,737 133,358 272,095 32,536 31,612 64,148 1,284 1,165 2,449Urban 13,279 9,639 22,918 1,755 1,564 3,319 130 106 236Total 152,016 142,997 295,013 34,291 33,176 67,467 1,414 1,271 2,685UTTARAKHAND

Rural 3,144,590 3,165,685 6,310,275 642,087 614,035 1,256,122 122,808 117,401 240,209Urban 1,181,334 997,740 2,179,074 138,685 122,379 261,064 8,526 7,394 15,920Total 4,325,924 4,163,425 8,489,349 780,772 736,414 1,517,186 131,334 124,795 256,129

Source: Census 2001

DISTRICT-WISE POPULATION AS PER CENSUS 2011S.

No.District Total Male Female Population

change inDecade

(%)

SexRatio

1 Uttarkashi 329686 168335 161351 11.75 9592 Chamoli 391114 193572 197542 5.60 10213 Rudraprayag 236857 111747 125110 4.14 11204 Tehri Garhwal 616409 296604 319805 1.93 10785 Dehradun 1698560 893222 805338 32.48 9026 Pauri Garhwal 686527 326406 360121 -1.51 11037 Pithoragarh 485993 240427 245566 5.13 10218 Bageshwar 259840 124121 135719 5.13 10939 Almora 621927 290414 331513 -1.73 114210 Champawat 259315 130881 128434 15.49 98111 Nainital 955128 494115 461013 25.20 93312 Udham Singh Nagar 1648367 858906 789461 33.40 91913 Haridwar 1927029 1025428 901601 33.16 879Uttarakhand 10116752 5154178 4962574 19.17 963

Source: Census 2011


( 4 )

DISTRICT-WISE POPULATION AS PER CENSUS 2001SN District Total

PopulationDecadalG. Rate

SC ST SexRatioPopu. % Popu. %1 Almora 630567 3.14 140430 22.27 878 0.14 11462 Bageswar 249462 17.56 64524 25.87 1943 0.78 11053 Chamoli 370359 13.51 67539 18.24 10484 2.83 10164 Champawat 224542 9.21 38098 16.97 740 0.33 10215 Dehradun 1282143 24.71 173448 13.53 99329 7.75 8876 Haridwar 1447187 26.30 313976 21.70 3139 0.22 8657 Nainital 762909 32.88 148184 19.42 4961 0.65 9068 Pauri Garhwal 697078 3.87 106653 15.30 1594 0.23 11069 Pithauragarh 462289 10.92 106449 23.03 19279 4.17 103110 Rudrprayag 227439 13.44 40311 17.72 186 0.08 111511 Tehri Garhwal 604747 16.15 87325 14.44 691 0.11 104912 US Nagar 1235614 27.79 162782 13.17 110220 8.92 90213 Uttarkashi 295013 22.72 67467 22.87 2685 0.91 941

STATE 8489349 19.20 1517186 18.81 256129 2.09 964Source: Census 2001

Literacy Status in 2001Categories India UttarakhandPerson - All 64.80% 72.28%Male 75.85% 84.01%Female 54.16% 60.26%Urban Area 80.30% -Rural Area 59.40% -SC - All 54.69% 63.40%SC Male 66.64% 77.30%SC Female 41.90% 48.70%ST - All 47.10% 63.20%ST Male 59.17% 76.40%ST Female 34.76% 49.40%

Source: census 2001District-wise Literacy Status in 2011

S.No. District Total Male Female1 Uttarkashi 75.98 89.26 62.232 Chamoli 83.48 94.18 73.203 Rudraprayag 82.09 94.97 70.944 Tehri Garhwal 75.10 89.91 61.775 Dehradun 85.24 90.32 79.616 Pauri Garhwal 82.59 93.18 73.267 Pithoragarh 82.93 93.45 72.978 Bageshwar 80.69 93.20 69.599 Almora 81.06 93.57 70.4410 Champawat 80.73 92.65 68.8111 Nainital 84.85 91.09 78.2112 Udham Singh Nagar 74.44 82.40 65.7313 Haridwar 74.62 82.26 65.96Uttarakhand 79.63 88.33 70.70

Source: Census 2011Land utilization data show that forest covered area in the State is very extensive. It isthe largest land utilization covering almost 63% of the area of the State. The next important


( 5 )

category is net shown area, which covers about 14% of the State’s area. In individual districtforest area varies from a low of 23% (Haridwar) to a high of 89% (Uttarkashi), while netshown area varies from a low of 4 to 5 per cent of the total area (Uttarkashi and Chamoli) to 63per cent (Hardwar).Since inception, the area covered by the new State has seen a great change. The Teraiand Bhabar areas of Kumaon stand transformed from malaria-infested and swampywildernesses into modern advanced agricultural and trading regions. With the spread of theroad network, most, but not all, of the interior areas are now linked to the main arteries of flowof trade and traffic, which is placed at the top of the present volume. As a result, their social andeconomic life stands transformed. However, access to the railway network is very limited, asonly 24 block headquarters out of 95 in the State are within a distance of 0-49 km of a railhead.Awareness and literacy levels are uniforly high across the districts.Map showing rail connectivity in 13 districts.

1.3 Economic ConditionUttarakhand is pre-dominantly rural with population usually concentrated in thevalleys and mountain slopes, with a typical village/habitation consisting of 30-40 families whoshare common resources. In the rural areas, the socio-economic condition is primarily basedon horticulture, sheep rearing and tourism. Agriculture has been adopted as means oflivelihood. Paddy is the major crops in irrigated areas and white Maize is grown in higher un-irrigated slopes. Other locally grown cereals and millets are Bhatt, Gahat and Mandua. Villagesare heavily dependent on the surrounding forests for compost and water. Individuallandholdings are small and scattered. Animal draught power is utilized to plough the landwherever possible. Other alternative is human labour which is used for the purpose;mechanized farming is out of question in hill regions.Inadequate production in the agricultural fields, increase in population, increasingdemand on natural resources and lack of alternative employment opportunities withinUttarakhand together are responsible for out-migration of the men-folk from the villages tocities within State and outside. In the absence of men, customarily entire burden of managinghousehold comes on women.1.4 State Economic Profile: Tapping the Vast PotentialUttarakhand with its vast natural resource base, large forest cover and enormous powerpotential holds the potential of being one of the most prosperous states in the country. Thestate domestic product during 2001-02 was around USD 1647 millions with a per annumgrowth rate of 4.4 per cent during 1993-94 to 2001-02.


( 5 )




( 5 )




( 6 )

Source: CSO

Source: Economic Survey 2003-04

1.5 InfrastructureInfrastructure is in terms of power and road connectivity, health and drinking waterfacility is developing in fast pace since the formation of State. 94% of State has drinking waterfacility. Villages are being connected with the help of massive rural roads programme andother schemes, while power situation is being addressed through combination of powersolutions. However since these tasks are time consuming and become so more in the hills,infrastructural blocks still is an issue. Providing facilities in far-flung areas is still a challengingjob. As a result clogged urban areas and sparsely populated rural hill areas pose good amountof challenge when it comes to project/programme management.1.6 Population distributionDistribution of rural population in Uttarakhand is rather uneven. This is vividly broughtout in the Map, which depicts the rural density pattern. The highest density of rural populationis concentrated in the southern half of the State, encompassing the districts of Dehradun (Doonvalley), Haridwar, Udham Singh Nagar and parts of Nainital, where the population density is451 persons per sq. km. and more. The reason for high population density in these districts isquite obviously their location in the fertile plains areas of the Upper Doab, Terai-Bhabar, andthe Doon Valley. In the inner Himalayas, there are many Blocks of average population density(between 151 and 300 persons per sq. km.) in Nainital, Almora, Pithoragarh, Champawat andBageshwar districts and a few isolated pockets in Pauri Garhwal, Tehri Garhwal, Chamoli andRudraprayag districts located in the Lesser Himalayas. Many of these places are situated infertile mountain valleys, of which the larger number is in Kumaon region than in Garhwal. Inthe rest of the State, population density is low (less than 150 persons per sq. km.).


( 7 )

District wise distribution of population density of the State

For understandable reasons, population is especially sparsely distributed in the GreaterHimalayas spanning Uttarkashi, Rudraprayag, Chamoli and Pithoragarh districts, large parts ofwhich are snow-bound, barren and inhospitable. When the population density map is read inconjunction with the map giving the location of Municipality and Block headquarters aninteresting pattern emerges. Most of the towns housing municipalities are located either in thedensely populated areas of the State located in the Upper Doab, Terai-Bhabar, and Doon Valleyregions, or along major rivers, especially in Garhwal. The latter also happens to be importanttourist centres, and halting places along the pilgrimage route to the Himalayan shrines. As aresult, large parts of the State lying in the Lesser Himalayas are not served by municipalities,and the only form of development centres that they have are the Kshetra Panchayat(Development Block) headquarters. Of the 95 Kshetra Panchayats in Uttarakhand, theheadquarters of only 29 have a municipal body. The KP headquarters, on the other hand, arefairly evenly spread out over the populated parts of the State. Rural density pattern is shown inthe map. The importance of the geographical factors in Uttarakhand may be interpreted withthe help of the relative distribution of the urban and rural population as well as Municipalitiesand Panchayats across the districts given in table below.

District Wise Distribution of Sub District UnitsDistrict % Rural

population(2001

census)

No. of KshetraPanchayats

% UrbanPopulation

(2001census)

No. of Municipalities

Total Within 0-49 Kmof Rail head

Total Within 0-49 Kmof Rail headUttarkashi 92.21 6 None 7.79 3 NoneChamoli 86.57 9 None 13.43 6 NoneRudraprayag 98.80 3 None 1.2 2 NoneTehri 90.33 9 1 9.67 6 2Dehradun 47.06 6 4 52.94 6 6Pauri Garhwal 87.05 15 3 12.95 4 2Pithoragarh 87.86 8 None 12.14 3 1Champawat 85.42 4 None 14.58 3 NoneAlmora 91.44 11 None 8.56 2 NoneBageshwar 96.87 3 None 3.13 1 NoneNainital 64.64 8 6 35.36 7 7U.S.Nagar 67.35 7 7 32.65 14 14Haridwar 69.14 6 6 30.86 6 6

Total 74.41 95 27 25.59 63 38


( 7 )




population(2001

census)


% UrbanPopulation

(2001census)




Total 74.41 95 27 25.59 63 38


( 7 )




population(2001

census)


% UrbanPopulation

(2001census)




Total 74.41 95 27 25.59 63 38


( 8 )

It is important to recognize and take into account the demographic, natural andgeographic features which characterize the State since they practically dominate the influencedaily life, economy, culture and tradition of the people, and provide a clue to the underlyingreality of the wide range and variety of settlement patterns, and greatly influence the nature ofand prospects for social and economic development.1.7 Literacy StatusIn terms of literacy levels Uttarakhand has 14th position in the country. With the helpof various government interventions there has been significant progress in the field ofeducation in the State. Literacy percentage of the state is 79.63 against all India average of74.04. Census data of 2011 shows that the gender gap is still an issue to be addressed inUttarakhand with male and female literacy rates being 88.33 and 70.70 percent respectively.

Cast-wise Literacy Rate (2001)

S.N. District

Literacy Rate RuralFemaleLiteracy

Rate

All Communities SC ST

Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 151 Almora 90.15 61.43 75.79 78.32 48.69 63.51 82.71 61.94 72.33 61.962 Bageshwar 88.56 57.45 73.01 81.53 48.78 64.76 92.01 70.32 80.31 57.003 Chamoli 89.66 61.63 75.65 84.35 52.95 68.72 92.43 67.22 79.29 59.114 Champawat 87.49 51.22 69.36 80.56 44.34 62.57 76.27 50.57 64.59 51.225 Dehradun 76.50 61.02 68.76 75.13 55.67 66.06 69.91 42.79 57.04 60.556 Haridwar 73.83 52.10 62.97 70.69 41.87 57.25 59.22 29.71 46.33 42.767 Nainital 72.74 59.17 65.96 73.49 59.17 66.33 80.23 76.22 78.23 55.358 Pauri 90.91 65.70 78.31 64.51 42.19 53.35 96.00 64.70 80.35 57.329 Pithoragarh 90.57 63.14 76.86 73.20 43.56 58.38 74.71 47.59 61.15 63.1410 Rudraprayag 90.73 59.98 75.36 60.70 35.12 47.91 91.60 78.30 84.95 59.4211 Tehri 76.85 44.98 60.92 50.58 30.89 40.74 81.63 68.57 75.10 51.5912 U.S. Nagar 75.22 53.35 64.29 68.53 40.72 55.62 78.52 48.97 63.95 62.2013 Uttarkashi 83.60 46.69 65.15 36.35 25.26 30.81 65.70 55.04 60.37 43.49Total 84.01 60.26 72.28 77.30 48.70 63.40 76.40 49.40 63.20 55.78

Source : Census 2001

Literacy Rate (2011)S.No. District Total Male Female1 Uttarkashi 75.98 89.26 62.232 Chamoli 83.48 94.18 73.203 Rudraprayag 82.09 94.97 70.944 Tehri Garhwal 75.10 89.91 61.775 Dehradun 85.24 90.32 79.616 Pauri Garhwal 82.59 93.18 73.267 Pithoragarh 82.93 93.45 72.978 Bageshwar 80.69 93.20 69.599 Almora 81.06 93.57 70.4410 Champawat 80.73 92.65 68.8111 Nainital 84.85 91.09 78.2112 Udham Singh Nagar 74.44 82.40 65.7313 Haridwar 74.62 82.26 65.96

Uttarakhand 79.63 88.33 70.70Source: Census 2011A key factor going in Uttarakhand's favour in attracting services and industrialinvestments is its significantly high level of literacy. The overall rate of literacy in the statejumped up to 79.63 per cent in 2011 from 72.28 percent in 2001. This endows it with largepool of educated labour that industry can draw from. Importantly, the spread of high level ofliteracy is even across the rural and urban sectors with the respective literacy rate of 77.11 and85.20 percent. The total school enrolment ratio for Uttarakhand for the age group of 6-17 was


( 9 )

at 87 percent, significantly higher than the all India ratio of 72 percent. The high level ofliteracy and existence of large number of good quality educational institutions, research andtraining institutes and institutes of excellence indicate the abundant availability of qualityhuman resource base. This can be supported by the facts charted hereby. During 2002-03, stateof Uttarakhand was amongst the few states with 100 percent trained teachers in all the levelsof education.1.8 Structure and Administration of EducationThe Directorate of School Education has been upgraded to the Directorate ofElementary, Directorate of Secondary and Directorate of Training vide Notification NumberEDN-C.A(1)-2/2004, dated 31.10.2005.Elementary Education in the state is being looked after by the Directorate of ElementaryEducation through the office of Director (Elementary Education) at the state level. At thedistrict level the elementary education is being looked by District Education Office(Elementary) through the office of DEO Elementary. There are District Institutes of Educationand Training (DIET) in all the districts which provide pre-service and in-service training to theprimary and upper primary school teachers. The district education officer (Elementary) issupported by Deputy Education Officer (DyEO) at the Education block level. Uttarakhand has95 Educational Blocks.There are three types of Elementary Schools-

Independent Primary Schools with Classes form I to V Independent Upper Primary Schools with Classes form VI to VIII Primary Schools attached with Upper Primary Schools with Classes I to VIII

1.9 Secondary EducationThe Secondary Education in the State is being looked after by the Department ofSecondary Education, through Director, Secondary Education. There are four types ofSecondary Schools: Independent Secondary Schools with Classes form IX to X Upper Primary Schools attached with Secondary Schools with Classes VI to X Upper Primary Schools attached with Secondary and Senior Secondary Schools withClasses VI to XII. Independent Senior Secondary Schools with Classes form XI to XII

1.10 Statistical ProfileTotal Schools: All Management

Sl.No.

District No. ofSchools

withClass I

to X

No. ofSchools

withClass Ito XII

No. ofSchools

withClass

V/VI toX

No. ofSchools

withClass VI

to XII

No. ofSchools

with ClassVIII/IX to

X

No. ofSchools

withClass

VIII/IX toXII

No. ofSchools

withClass XI

to XII

TotalSchool

1 ALMORA 0 26 115 194 3 1 0 3392 BAGESHWAR 0 4 43 74 0 1 0 1223 CHAMOLI 11 6 89 130 12 8 1 2574 CHAMPAWAT 6 11 50 64 4 6 0 1415 DEHRADUN 45 191 55 116 47 20 1 4757 HARDWAR 24 67 49 69 28 20 6 2638 NAINITAL 16 65 83 142 1 1 1 3096 PAURI 8 27 135 244 7 8 0 4299 PITHORAGARH 15 22 93 131 3 2 0 26610 RUDRAPRAYAG 1 5 37 83 9 13 0 14811 TEHRI 6 7 65 195 52 11 1 33712 U.S.NAGAR 25 84 87 95 37 13 8 34913 UTTARKASHI 14 5 7 71 46 15 0 158State Total 171 520 908 1608 249 119 18 3593

Source U-DISE 2016-17


( 10 )

Organisational Structure of Department of School Education, Uttarakahnd

Principal (DIET)

Secretary

Director General

Director (SE) Director (EE) Director (Trg)(AR&T)

Secretary(Exam Board)

AD (SE) AD (EE) AD (SCERT) AD (SIEMATSI(SEIMAT)

Chief Education Officer

DEO (Secondary) DEO (Elementary)

BEO Dy. EO


( 11 )

RASTRIYA MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA ABHIYAN. UTTARAKHAND(Structural Organization)

S.P.O. (State Project Office)

State Project Director (Ex officio Director General, School Education)

Additional State Project Director

Assistant ProjectDirector(SEMIS, ICT, &Coordination)

Assistant ProjectDirector(Academic, Pedagogy,Library, Quality,Training, Guiding andCounseling Research& Evaluation)

Assistant ProjectDirector(Planning, Budget, CivilWorks, Model School &Girls Hostel)

Assistant ProjectDirector(Innovative Activity,Girls Education,Inclusive Education,Physical & VocationalEducation, Out ofSchool Children)

Finance Controller(Ex Officio)Joint Project Director(Academic & Training) Joint Project Director(Planning)

Account Officer

Administrative Officer

Accountant

Computer Operators (03) & Peons (03) -- Through Out Sourcing


( 12 )

RASTRIYA MADHYAMIK SHIKSHA ABHIYAN. UTTARAKHAND(Structural Organization)

D.P.O. (District Project Office)

1.11 MIS SystemAt present existing educational management information system (EMIS) for planningand management of school education is carried out at the district levels. At the district levelMIS wing is functional at SSA and RMSA offices. The MIS is collected and executed throughUDISE software supported by NUEPA. The information on DCF is collected every year as on30th September from all educational institutions in the district and its reports are generated atthe district level through U-DISE which is further utilised for the formulation of Annual WorkPlan and Budget for the district under RMSA. Despite of U-DISE census data and districteducation offices source data is also used for planning purpose.

District Project Officer (Ex-officio DistrictEducation Officer, S.E.)

Assistant Finance & AccountOfficer

District Resource Person(SEMIS, ICT, Open School RTI& Coordination, Academic,Pedagogy, Library, Quality,Training, Guiding andCounseling Research &Evaluation)

District Resource Person(Planning, Budget, Civil Works,Model School & Girls Hostel,Innovative Activity, Girls Education,Inclusive Education, Physical &Vocational Education, Out of SchoolChildren)Accountant

Computer Operators (01/District) -- Through Out Sourcing

Chapter - 2 : Implementation Status

( 13 )

Chapter - 2Implementation Status

2.1 Institutional Arrangements for Implementation

2.1.1 RMSAGovernment of India has committed to the goal universalisation of secondary andhigher secondary education. The 11th Five Year Plan document particularly emphasised on theuniversalisation of secondary and higher secondary education in the same line and committedfor. The Hon’ble Prime Minister of India speech on Independence Day in 2007 has proposed tolaunch the Scheme for Universalisation of Access for Secondary Education (SUCCESS). Aprecursor to these initiatives was the National Policy on Education (NPE), 1986 which statedthat access to secondary education should be widened. Then, the Tenth Plan Mid-TermAppraisal (MTA) document of the Planning Commission of India recommended for setting upof a new Mission for Secondary Education on the lines of SSA. Finally, it is the recommendationof the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) which is the highest deliberative andadvisory forum on Education in the country, committee report 2005. In accordance with thegoal of universalisation of secondary and higher secondary education, initiatives are made forthe plan of action in this direction.The Centrally Sponsored Scheme Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA) is amodified version of SUCCESS. The RMSA scheme is for universalisation of access to andimprovement of quality at the secondary and higher secondary stage. Since education is a statesubject by Constitution in the Indian federal system and thereby the state governments are thepolicy/decision makers on this subject, the RMSA is to motivate the state government andprepare them to take up the goal of Universalisation of Secondary and Higher SecondaryEducation in their respective states. Unlike the Universalisation of Elementary Education whichis by Constitution a mandate, the Universalisation of Secondary and Higher SecondaryEducation is not mandatory by Constitution but by morale and by need.Under the RMSA the central government through the Ministry of Human ResourceDevelopment (MHRD) helps the states in mapping the secondary education system at present,approach and strategy for universalising the secondary and higher secondary education,setting the goal and targets, plan of action, programmes design and implementation andmobilising resources for all these activities. In this context, this document is to present thestatus and perspective framework plan for the secondary education in Uttarakhand.Goals and Objectives at National Level and State levelThe national policy document of RMSA has drawn up the following specific goals andobjectives:i) To ensure that all secondary schools have physical facilities, staff and supplies at leastaccording to the prescribed standards through financial support in case ofGovernment/ Local Body and Government aided schools, and appropriate regulatorymechanism in the case of other schools;ii) To improve access to secondary schooling to all young persons according to norms –through proximate location (say, Secondary Schools within 5 kms., and HigherSecondary Schools within 7-10 kms), efficient and safe transportarrangements/residential facilities, depending on local circumstances including openschooling. However, in hilly and difficult areas, these norms can be relaxed. Preferablyresidential schools may be set up in such areas;iii) To ensure that no child is deprived of secondary education of satisfactory quality dueto gender, socio-economic, disability and other barriers;iv) To improve quality of secondary education resulting in enhanced intellectual, socialand cultural learning;


( 14 )

v) To ensure that all students pursuing secondary education receive education of goodquality; andvi) Achievement of the above objectives would also, inter-alia, signify substantialprogress in the direction of the Common School System.The state abides by these broad national goals and objectives, and specifically adds oncertain key qualitative objectives that would guide its progress towards meeting its vision andgoal. They are:a. To equip and empower professional competence of the heads and teachers for schooleffectiveness and classroom processes;b. To provide opportunity to secondary level students to compare, collaborate, competeand contribute to the world at large; andc. To develop life-skills of students, and enhance overall quality of life.The RMSA goals that the State has envisaged are: All secondary school age children in schools by 2013, All secondary school age children in secondary classes appropriate to their age by 2017,and All higher secondary age children will complete secondary school by 2020.

Approach and Strategy for Secondary Stage at National Level and State levelThe national policy document mentions that in the context of USE, large-scale inputs interms of additional schools, additional classrooms, teachers and other facilities need to beprovided to meet the challenge of numbers, credibility and quality. It inter-alia requiresassessment and provision of educational needs, physical infrastructure, human resource,academic inputs and effective monitoring of implementation of the programmes. The schemewill initially cover up to class X. Subsequently, the higher secondary stage will also be taken up,preferably within two years of the implementation. The strategy for universalizing access tosecondary education and improving its quality are as under:AccessFor providing universal access to quality secondary education it is imperative thatespecially designed broad norms are developed at the national level and provision may bemade for each State/UT keeping in mind the geographical, socio-cultural, linguistic anddemographic condition of not just the State/UT but also, wherever necessary, of the locality.Increased access will be achieved by:

Strengthening of existing Secondary Schools & Higher Secondary Schools; Upgradation of Upper Primary Schools in Secondary Schools based on micro planningexercise with all necessary infrastructure facilities and teachers. Ashram Schools will begiven preference while upgrading upper primary schools; Upgradation of Secondary Schools in Higher Secondary Schools based upon therequirements; Opening of new Secondary Schools/ Higher Secondary Schools in so far unserved areasbased on the school mapping exercise. All upgradation and new schools will haveadequate physical infrastructure, man power and teaching learning equipments; Rain harvesting systems will be installed in existing school buildings; Existing school buildings will also be made disabled friendly; and New schools will also be set up in PPP mode.While Uttarakhand has already ensured approximate 100% GAR in primary and upperprimary levels to all habitations as per Norms, school mapping exercise has indicated that anumber of districts have not yet provided adequate secondary schools within the 5km Norm.While residential schools should also be an option, up-gradation wherever relevant is to be


( 15 )

preferred. Each Secondary and Higher Secondary School will develop an institutional plan, andeach block a micro-mapping exercise. Due regard should be given where needed to openschools in hilly terrain and with natural barriers.QualityThe national policy document states that quality will be achieved by:

Providing required infrastructure like, Black Board, furniture, Libraries, Science andMathematics laboratories, computer labs, toilet cluster; Appointment of additional teachers and in-service training of teachers; Bridge courses for enhancing learning ability for students passing out of class VIII; Reviewing curriculum to meet the NCF, 2005 norms; Residential accommodation for teachers in rural and difficult hilly areas; and Preference will be given to accommodation for female teachers.In furthering these, the state aims to include availability of ICT infrastructure andintensive use of ICT in secondary education, provision of more number of days of in-servicetraining to teachers, and overall improvement of performance of all schools by decentralizingtheir management and improving accountability. Uttarakhand aims to establish child-friendlyschools with prescribed benchmarks of quality.Providing infra-structure includes not only blackboards in usable well-polishedconditions with chalks and dusters all round the year, but also SMART boards in schools,furniture that is both student-friendly and classroom friendly facilitating movement and group-work, libraries with books to kindle the interest of reading among children along with registersto maintain student-use and follow-up like book-reviews, and science, math and multi-medialanguage laboratories with adequate equipments for active use by every student. Besides,adequate and appropriate provision of drinking water and toilets cannot be neglected.Uttarakhand is keen to focus not just on the above quantitative inputs to quality but onqualitative teaching-learning processes in place. It follows the lines of the Secondary EducationCommission, 1952 which defined curriculum as not just the academic subjects traditionallytaught in the school but the totality of experiences of students in school, classrooms, library,laboratory, playgrounds and in the numerous informal contacts between teachers and pupils.Education is meaningful for children when adequate variety and elasticity in the curriculumallows for individual differences and adaptation to individual needs and interests. The state isalso keen to turn a number of ideas provided in the National Curriculum Framework intoreality.

EquityThe national level document mentions that equity will be improved by: Free lodging/ boarding facilities for students belonging to SC,ST,OBC and minoritycommunities; Hostels/ residential schools, cash incentive, uniform, books, separate toilets for girls. Providing scholarships to meritorious/ needy students at secondary level; Inclusive education will be the hallmark of all the activities. Efforts will be made toprovide all necessary facilities for the differently abled children in all the schools; and Expansion of Open and Distance Learning needs to be undertaken, especially for thosewho cannot pursue full time secondary education, and for supplementation/enrichment of face-to-face instruction. This system will also play a crucial role foreducation of out-of-school children.In Uttarakhand, which has been a forerunner in terms of socio-political movements forequity through education, equity will be an in-built priority within every strategy of access andquality. Besides, special care will also be taken for socially disadvantaged pockets. Despite thestate’s positive discrimination to disprivileged communities over time, some difficult-to-reachareas are inaccessible and isolated small habitations particularly in hilly and forest areas with


( 16 )

lack of adequate qualified women teachers and adequate accommodations for students andteachers. There are also some pockets with frequent migration and with persisting high genderand social gaps. It is in this regard that the State’s proactive policies for equity in secondaryeducation will gain special consideration. First generation learners need special care in anumber of areas.Institutional Reforms and Strengthening of Resource InstitutionsNecessary administrative reforms in State will be a precondition for Central assistance.These Institutional reforms include:

Reforms in school governance- Improve schools’ performance by decentralizing theirmanagement and accountability; Adopting a rational policy of teacher recruitment, deployment, training, remunerationand career advancement; Undertaking reforms in educational administration including modernization/e-governance and delegation/de-centralization; Provision of necessary professional and academic inputs in the secondary educationsystem at all levels, i.e., from the school level upwards; and streamlining financialprocedures for speedy flow of funds and their optimal utilization. Necessary strengthening of resource institutions at various levels, e.g., NCERT(including RIEs), NUEPA and NIOS, at the national level; SCERTs, State Open Schools,SIEMATs, etc., at the State level; and University Departments of Education, ReputedInstitutions of Science/Social Science/Humanities Education, and Colleges of TeacherEducation (CTEs)/ Institutions of Advanced Study in Education (IASEs) funded underthe Centrally-sponsored Scheme of Teacher Education. Involvement of Panchayati Raj and Municipal Bodies, Community, Teachers, Parentsand other stakeholders in the management of Secondary Education, through bodies likeSchool Management Committees and Parent – Teacher Associations will be ensured inplanning process, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.In this regard, Uttarakhand has specific strategies in place. In terms of decentralising,the state government will appoint District Project Officers and 26 District Resource Persons in13 districts to supervise and monitor RMSA indicators of progress and record needs andimprovements in quality components. SMDC will monitor attendance of staff and students aswell, besides involvement in civil and financial matters. The state will enhance the capacity ofSCERT/DIET academic faculty in order that they can in turn enhance the training capacity ofteacher educators at Block Centre in cascade mode. The linkage between School Education andSIEMAT will be strengthened. DIETs will be enhanced for the training of secondary educationteachers and it will be the nodal agency for training at the district level.Central Government operates four Centrally Sponsored Schemes i.e. (i) ICT@ schools forproviding assistance to State Governments for computer education and computer aidededucation in secondary and higher secondary schools; (ii) Integrated Education for DisabledChildren (IEDSS) for assisting State Governments and NGOs in main streaming the disabledchildren in school education; (iii) Strengthening of Boarding and Hostel facilities for GirlStudents of Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools (Access and Equity) for providingassistance to NGOs to run Girls’ Hostels in the rural areas; and (iv) Quality improvement inschools which included provision of assistance to State Governments for introduction of Yoga,for improvement of Science education in schools, for environment education and forpopulation education in addition to supporting International Science Olympiads.All these schemes, in the present or modified forms, will be subsumed in a new schemeand will include provision for earning while learning for financially weaker children bypreparing them for self-employment or part-time employment.


( 17 )

State Norms and RMSA NormsThe state norms with respect to universalisation of secondary education in Uttarakhandare following:State Norms of Different Activity

S.No. Activity State Norms1. Opening of New School or Up-gradation of school As per RMSA norms. Norms are relaxed for hilly terrain andSC, ST & Minority dominated areas.2. Teacher Recruitment There is three ways of teacher recruitment at secondarylevel in Uttarakhand.(i) Through Departmental selection process: Schooleducation department prepared a seniority list ofelementary level teacher across the state on the basis oftheir academic qualification & ACR. Out of totalvacancies of secondary teachers 30% vacancies fieldthrough elementary level teachers.(ii) Through open departmental test: Department ofschool education conducted a written test of all eligibleelementary teachers to recruit as a secondary levelteacher. The eligibility criteria is graduate and B.Ed.with regular teacher in a govt. elementary school. Out oftotal vacancies of secondary teachers 10% of vacanciesfilled by this process.(iii)Direct recruitment: State govt. conducted openrecruitment examination for TGT, which are at leastB.Ed. graduates these recruited qualified candidates asfresh secondary level teacher. State Govt. has advertised3089 posts for secondary teachers through Uttarakhandboard of Technical education. The written examinationis schedule on March 2015. These teachers are inposition till August 2015.Principal/Head master of secondary school arethrough 100% promotion post from secondary levelteacher.3. Lab & Office AttendantAppointment Through Out sourcing Agency.4. Deployment of Teaching and NonTeaching Staff 01 Head Master and 07 Assistant Teacher of core subjects i.e.Hindi, English, Maths, Science, Social Study, Physical Education &01 Optional Subject, 01 Office Assistant, 01 IV-Class Staff.5. Civil Works As per RMSA norms.6. Civil Work Unit Cost As per DSR and Cost Index of North Zone-IV according to CPWDletter no. 22(1)cost index/1443 dated 27/08/2015.7. Girls Hostel Furniture As per present market rate.8. Teacher Salary As per recommendation of Central Pay Commission,according to 7th Pay Commission average monthly salary of:1. Head Master : Rs. 70,000/-2. Assistant Teacher : Rs. 60,000/-9. Honorarium of Out SourceEmployee in Girls Hostel As per State Minimum wages Rs. 5,000/- per month.

2.1.2 Brief introduction to ICTThe Govt. of Uttarakhand has initiated the process of integration of information andTechnology in education under the ‘Arohi’ Programme since 2001 to prepare the students fordigital future. Under this programme efforts were made to computerize every secondary andsenior secondary school in the state. More than 1000 computers have been provided todifferent Govt. and Govt. Aided schools. The state government made provisions for teachers’


( 18 )

computer training through various training programmes of intel and Microsoft companies.Educational content CDs have been provided to 34 schools and all DIETs of the state under e-class Project and we are further in the process to provide these content CDs to all schools ofUttarakhand.A comparative evaluation of 13 pilot schools covered under e-class project had beenfurnished by the department on the basis of results of last three years and a progressive reportof the learning status of the students studying in e-class has been found.125 schools of the state have already been covered under the ICT Scheme through outrightpurchase. The implementation of the scheme in the schools has empowered the learners forutilization and application of the skills, knowledge and understanding and teachers to use ICTas a tool to make the teaching and learning process/classroom practices more interesting.Emphasis of learning is shifting from acquiring information to constructing knowledge.Students are being equipped to “learn to learn” and “How to learn” and also acquire the skillsrequired for changing nature of the work places.Steps taken by States/UTs for promotion of Computer Education. Give details of Policies,Strategies adopted for computer education at Secondary and Higher Secondary StageFor the better implementation of ICT in Schools Scheme and to concentrate on betteroutputs of the schemes, in ‘ICT Cell’ has been established under the Director, SecondaryEducation – Uttarakhand. A Project Monitoring Unit (PMU – ICT) has also been established atDirectorate Level for monitoring of the schools covered under ICT@Schools Scheme. Fortraining, and guidance of teachers to ensure the best use of ICT tools in schools. Stategovernment has also established a ‘State Educational information and Technology Academy’(SEITA). The ICT Programme among the schools is being implemented in the following manner.a. Extending Computer literacy and awareness to every student.b. Enabling the teachers to enhance their subject knowledge and professional skills withthe use of ICT.c. Facilitating the teachers to use ICT as an aid for teaching learning process and to makethe classroom interactive and participatory.d. Enabling students to learn through ICT and provide facilities for interacting with theircounterparts across the country.Information and Communication Technology Project (ICT@School) in 625 GovernmentSchoolThe ICT Project is a centrally sponsored scheme in 90:10 share basis and is beingimplemented in 625 Govt. Secondary Schools of the state in first phase. The scheme wasapproved by Project Monitoring and Evaluation Group (PMEG), MHRD.

ICT lab comprising: 1 Server, 12 computers, 1 Multi Functional Printer, web Camera,Operating System along with related software, fixed table assembly and 20 chairs incomputer lab Smart Class room –comprising of 1 LCD TV 40 inches & 1 computer system,comprising of one Integrated Computer Projector, Computer table & chair Site Preparation (Vinyl flooring, earthing, electric & LAN cabling) of Computer Lab. Training for 2500 teachers to use multimedia educational content. The provision ofquarterly refreshers to the teachers has also been made. The scheme is being monitored at State, district and School level by RMSA. Nodalofficers at district level and Principal assisted by Assistant teachers looking after theproject in detail. A mechanism has been devised to make the optimum use of existingresources at institution level. Multimedia Educational Content being provided by M/s S.CHAND & Company for 625hard spots for 9th to 12th classes in the subject of Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry,Biology, Science, Social Science.


( 19 )

The separate ICT cell has been established in RMSA and the cell is being headed by theJoint Director.2.1.3 Brief introduction to IEDSS

Overview The Scheme of Inclusive Education for Disabled at Secondary Stage (IEDSS) has beenlaunched from the year 2009-10. This Scheme replaces the earlier scheme of Integrated Education for Disabled Children(IEDC) and would provide assistance for the inclusive education of the disabled childrenin classes IX-XII

Aims To enable all students with disabilities, after completing eight years of elementaryschooling, to pursue further four years of secondary schooling in an inclusive and enablingenvironment.ObjectivesThe scheme covers all children studying at secondary stage in Government, local bodyand Government-aided schools, with one or more disabilities as defined under the Personswith Disabilities Act (1995) and the National Trust Act (1999) in the class IX to XII, namelyblindness, low vision, leprosy cured, hearing impairment, locomotor disabilities, mentalretardation, mental illness, autism and cerebral palsy, and may eventually cover speechimpairment, learning disabilities, etc. Girls with disabilities receive special focus to help themgain access to secondary schools, as also to information and guidance for their developingpotential. Setting up of Model inclusive schools in every State is envisaged.Components Assistance is admissible for two major componentsStudent-oriented components, such as medical and educational assessment, books andstationery, uniforms, transport allowance, reader allowance, stipend for girls, support services,assistive devices, boarding the lodging facility, therapeutic services, teaching learningmaterials, etc.Other components include appointment of special education teachers, allowances for generalteachers for teaching such children, teacher training, orientation of school administrators,establishment of resource room, providing barrier free environment, etc.Financial AssistanceCentral assistance for all items covered in the scheme is on 100 percent basis. The StateGovernments are only required to make provisions for a scholarship of Rs. 600 per disabledchild per annum.IEDSS scheme implemented in the state from 2010-11. According to guideline of GOI,Administrative Cell constituted at State level to exercise the work and achieve the goal ofscheme. The profile of Administrative Cell as follows:

Profile of Administrative CellS.N. Designation Pay Scale/ Grade pay No. of Sanctioned Post1 Deputy Director 15600-39100 +6600 012 Psychologist Out Sourcing 013 Stenographer Out Sourcing 014 LDC Out Sourcing 01

Linkages with other departments and NGOIn Uttarakhand many National level institution are working in the field of disabilities.Their help are being taken in different activities of IEDSS scheme. Identification and


( 20 )

distribution of disability certificate become possible with the help of Chief Medical Officers ofrespective districts. The orientation of teachers, 05 days programme conducted at district levelwith the help of Govt. institutions like National Institute for Visually Handicapped (NIVH),National Institute for Orthopedically Handicapped (NIOH) and NGOs working in the field ofdisabilities. The experts from these institutions are also the member of State Co-ordinationCommittee/State Resource Group (SRG).Institutes, Schools and NGOs Working in Uttarakhand

S.No. Name of NGOs Area of work1 National Institute for theVisually Handicapped Education &Vocational Training for people with visualimpairment.2 Sharp Memorial School for Blind Education Adult and Children with visual impairment.Foundation Course study centre M P Bhuj3 Bajaj Institute of Hearingimpairment Education Children with Hearing impairment. StateResource Centre4 Cheshire Home Providing residential & other facilities to people withmental & physical disabilities, Early Intervention Centre5 Raphael Home Hostel day centre for people with mental disability,Dyslexia unit6 Latika Roy Foundation Early Intervention through therapy and education forchildren with multiple disabilities7 Gokul Society for Handicapped Education Vocational Training & plastic Surgery Childrenwith physical disability8 Happy Family Health care &research Mental & physical disabilities, Early Intervention Centre.9 Karuna Vihar Special school for Kids with mild to moderate learningdifficulties 5-14 years10 Nanhi Duniya Special school for Deaf & Dumb.11 Jyoti Mansic Viklang Vidyalaya Special school for mental disability12 Laxman Ram Dahiya MemorialPunarvash Sanstha Special school for mental disability & L D.13 Omkeshav Swechhik Sansthan Special school for mental disability & L D.14 Indira Gandhi Rastriya ChetnaKendra Special school for physical disabilities.Foundation Course study centre M P Bhuj15 Ajaranand Andh Vidyalaya Providing residential & other facilities Education Adult andChildren with visual impairment16 Magal Deep Vidya MandirKhatyari Almora Special school for mental disability & children withmultiple disabilities17 Sharp Samiti Chamoli Parents Counseling. Home base training18 UNECS research & developmentsocietyBilona Bageshwar Parents Counseling. Home base training. FoundationCourse study centre M P Bhuj19 U.S.R. Indu samitiRamnagar.Nainital Parents Counseling. Home base training20 Vijaya Public School. NaogawnUttarkashi Education General and Children with visual impairment.2.1.4 Brief introduction to Girls Hostel

IntroductionThis is a new Centrally Sponsored Scheme launched in 2008-09 and is beingimplemented from 2009-10 to set up a 100-bedded Girls’ Hostel in each of 3479 EducationallyBackward Blocks (EBBs) in the country. The Scheme has replaced the earlier NGO drivenScheme for construction and running of Girls’ Hostels for Students of Secondary and Higher


( 21 )

Secondary Schools, under which assistance was provided to voluntary organisations forrunning Girls’ Hostels.ObjectiveThe main objective of the Scheme is to retain the girl child in secondary school so thatgirl students are not denied the opportunity to continue their study due to distance to school,parents’ financial affordability and other connected societal factors. Another objective of theScheme is to make Secondary and Senior Secondary education accessible to a larger number ofgirl students.Target GroupThe girl students in the age group of 14-18 yrs. studying in classes IX and XII belongingto SC, ST, OBC, Minority communities and BPL families will form the target group of theScheme. Students passing out of KGBV will be given preference in admission in hostels. At least50% of girls admitted will be from SC, ST, OBC and Minority communities.Sharing PatternCentral government will bear 90% of the recurring and non-recurring project cost. 10%will be borne by the State Govt.Girls Hostel (Scheme for construction and running of Girls’ Hostel for students ofSecondary and Higher secondary schools)The gender disparities still persist in rural areas, particularly among the disadvantagedcommunities like SCs, STs, OBCs and Minorities. Significant gaps in enrolment of girls at theelementary and secondary levels as compared to boys are visible. Therefore, the mainobjective of the scheme is to bring the girl child to school and to retain her in school. Thescheme thus envisages setting up of hostels with lodging and boarding facilities in theEducationally Backward Blocks (EBBs) and areas nearing concentration of above target groupsso that the girl students are not denied the opportunity to continue their study due to societalfactors. Another objective of the scheme is to make Secondary and Senior Secondary educationaccessible to a larger number girl student.Target GroupThe girl students in the age group 14-18 studying in classes IX to XII and belonging toSC, ST, OBC , Minority communities and BPL families will form the target group of the scheme.Around half of the them at least belong to the SC, ST, OBC and Minority communities.EligibilityGirls belonging to SC, ST, OBC, Minority communities and BPL families and studying inclasses IX-XII in a recognized school in the EBB (run by any authority, State, District or NGO)with a valid certificate from school Head Master will be eligible to stay in the hostels. At least50% of the girls admitted to the hostels should belong to SC, ST, OBC, Minority communities.Strategy for Construction of Hostels/SchoolsIt is proposed to construct one hostel with the capacity of 100 girls in each of theeducational backward blocks. Wherever there is space in KGBV compound, the hostels wouldpreferably be constructed there. Such hostels would be under the administrative control ofconcerned Secondary School concerned. Students passing out of KGBV will be given preferencein admission in hostel. In case, there is no spare space in the KGBV compound or in the blockswhere no KGBV has been sanctioned, the hostel may be constructed in the compound of asecondary/ higher secondary school selected by the district authority. The hostel will be underthe administrative control of the Headmaster/Principal of concerned school. However,students of neighboring schools will also be eligible for staying in the hostel.


( 22 )

The minimum living space available to each inmate should be 40 sq. feet excludingkitchen, toilet and other common space. The buildings are designed as earthquake resistantand fitted with basic fire safety equipments. Efforts also be made to design the buildings withprovision for solar energy generation, use of solar cooker and biogas & rainwater harvesting.There is provision for CWSN. State Government nominated State Irrigation Department asconstruction agency for hostel building construction.Educationally Backward Blocks (EBBs) of UttarakhandNational female literacy rate and gender gap greater than the average national gendergap were identified as Educationally Backward Blocks (EBBs). Uttarakhand has a total of 95blocks of which on the basis of 1991 census there were 36 EBBs. On the basis of 2001 censusthe numbers of EBBs have come down from 36 to 23 however, in which four blocks (forestvillages) are non habituated so only 19 EBBs are eligible for girls hostel scheme.

EBBs according to 1991 & according to 2001 censusName of District Name of EBB Blocks(1991) Name of EBB Blocks (2001) FLR 2001 GG

Uttarkashi Dunda Chinyalisaur 41.5 43.1Chinyalisaur Purola 44.7 36.7Naugaon Naugaon 39.5 39.6Purola Mori 33.7 34MoriChamoli Ghat --- --- ---GairsainRudraprayag Ukhimath --- --- ---JakholiTehri

Bhilangna Bhilangana 44.5 38.7Thauldhar Tholdhar 45.5 38.6Devprayag Narendernagar 45.5 37.2Jakhnidhar Pratapnagar 38.8 49Jounpur Jounpur 39.1 41.6PratapnagarDehradun Chakrata Chakrata 34.8 24.8Kalsi Kalsi 43.9 25.6Pauri Thalisain Forest Village 41.16 18.7Pithoragarh Munsyari --- --- ---DharchulaGangolihatBageshwar Kapkot --- --- ---Almora Lamghara DhouladeviDhauladevi 45.5 34.5Champawat Pati Forest VillageBarakot 34.6 29.2LohaghatChampawatNanital Okhalkanda --- --- ---U.S.Nagar Shitarganj Bajpur 41.4 24.5KhatimaKashipur Forest Village 35.8 24.6

HaridwarRoorkee Roorkee 45.7 23.3Bhagwanpur Bhagwanpur 42.4 25.7Khanpur Khanpur 36.6 30.6Laksar Narsan 43.2 27.7Bahadrabad 46 24.7Laksar 42.7 29.5Forest Village 15.17 20.89

Total 36 23


( 23 )

In Uttarakhand state 19 Education Block are under this scheme. 100 Girls will beenrolled in each hostel. Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke Liye Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad isimplementing the scheme, presently 19 hostels are running with KGBVs. State government isbearing recurring cost and other expenditure of these girls since year 2008-2009. A separatecell will be constituted for monitoring of this scheme under state project office RMSAUttarakhand. Similarly at the district level the district project officer will monitor the girlshostel.2.1.5 Brief introduction to Vocational EducationThe Government of India has brought out a received centrally sponsored scheme ofVocationalisation of Secondary Education by integrating employability education into schooleducation in September 2011. The scheme is operated within the National VocationalEducation Qualification Framework (NVEQF) presently known as National Skill Qualificationframework (NSQF), which establishes a system of clear educational pathways from school tohigher education while providing certification of vocational skills. The project has beenapproved for the state of Uttarakhand by MHRD, GOI and accordingly Uttarakhand will beimplementing the NSQF from the academic year 2016-17. The aim is to start the project inacademic year 2016-17 at level 1 (Class 9th) in Normal Track in about 245 Government schoolsin Uttarakhand. The student who starts the Normal Track in 2016-17 will attain the Level 4Certification by 2020. The aim of this project is to make students employable when theycomplete secondary education. The project will be jointly funded by Central Government andthe State Government.ObjectivesThe objectives of this project are to:

Successfully introduce and integrate vocational (NVEQF compatible) automotivecourses at the Class 9th – 12th (in the 14-17 years age group) on an optional/voluntarybasis in schools in Uttarakhand from the academic year 2016. More schools could beadded or removed from the list at the discreatin of the Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke LiyeMadhyamik Shiksha Parisad or School Education Department, Uttarakhand from timeto time. These Automotive courses will be industry driven based upon NationalOccupational standards (NOS) set by the skill council. The courses will be introduced in normal track mode in Class 9th (Level 1).

This project is expected to improve employability of the students passing from thesecourses because of industry driven inputs and exposure. This will be measured byenhanced employment (70% of placement interested candidates placed in workplaceas employees or interns) of the students achieving Level 4 certification. Another expected outcome is reduction in school dropout rates and better attendancelevels due to better job prospects through such a program.Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke Liye Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad is implementing agency forvocational education programme. The State Government has decided to outsource thevocational training partners for implementation of programme.


( 24 )

2.2 Progress against interventions approved till last year

2.2.1 RMSAYear-wise Progress of Construction Work

(As on February, 2017)

YearUp-gradation Strengthening

Sanc. Complete InProgress

UnStarted Sanc. Complete In

ProgressUn

Started2009-10 22 20 2 0 379 374 5 02010-11 55 43 12 0 126 112 14 02011-12 140 111 29 0 0 0 0 02013-14 35 27 8 0 32 28 4 02014-15 0 0 0 0 162 44 118 02015-16 9 0 5 4 0 0 0 02016-17 19 0 1 18 175 0 0 175Total 280 201 57 22 874 558 141 175

Year-wise Progress of Construction of Strengthening of Schools(As on February, 2017)

Year Name of Work Sanctioned Complete In Progress Un Started

2009-10Class Room 132 126 6 0Laboratory Room 72 71 1 0Library Room 66 65 1 0Art/Craft Room 40 39 1 0Computer Room 50 49 1 0Toilet Block 197 194 3 0





Total

Class Room 707 379 192 136Laboratory Room 359 167 98 94

Library Room 495 224 109 162Art/Craft Room 512 214 131 167Computer Room 431 203 106 122

Toilet Block 399 319 56 24Govt. of Uttarakhand nominated state Irrigation Department and Rural EngineeringService Department as construction agencies for RMSA. MOU signed with these agencies by


( 25 )

Uttarakhand Sabhi ke Liye Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad. Construction agencies visited to allconstruction sites and prepared site specific design and estimates. Executives committee ofRMSA requested to state govt. for bear the additional cost of civil work under state budget.State Govt. agreed to bear additional cost for all works commissioned under RMSA. In year2015-16 State Government also nominated PWD and SMC/SMDC as construction agency.Local community provided the land for construction work free of cost. Civil workmonitoring committee is constituted at school level, which monitors the day to day progress ofcivil work. SMDC prepared estimates for major repair work at school level with the help oftechnical person of construction agency. Uttarakhand Sabhi ke Liye Madhyamik ShikshaParishad recruited an Executive Engineer and an Assistant Engineer to provide technicalsupport for civil work at state level. A civil work committee constituted at school level formonitoring of civil work. State Government has also decides the third party evaluation of civilwork through Planning Department and PWD. A joint Director and an Asst. Director arelooking after the civil work at state level. Detail of district wise additional grant beard by StateGovernment for civil work under RMSA:Additional Grant Released by State Govt. for Civil Work

(As on February, 2017) (Rs. in Lakhs)SN District 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2013-14 2014-15 Total1 Almora 102.53 146.00 222.90 38.68 76.89 587.002 Bageshwar 22.96 113.21 351.99 16.76 40.27 545.193 Chamoli 136.55 613.14 454.03 3.28 110.32 1317.324 Champawat 28.01 59.35 219.18 8.68 15.64 330.865 Dehradun 63.21 167.60 151.26 4.87 197.42 584.366 Haridwar 0.00 120.92 147.69 126.03 213.32 607.967 Nainital 33.24 352.85 171.48 51.96 91.01 700.548 Pauri 118.57 160.72 206.98 0.32 192.27 678.869 Pithoragarh 47.35 39.94 471.65 0.00 219.11 778.0510 Rudraprayag 16.21 97.64 133.86 1.32 156.27 405.3011 Tehri 0.00 28.34 144.72 88.86 40.41 302.3312 US Nagar 13.79 94.92 639.33 16.66 -13.08 751.6213 Uttarkashi 34.21 183.25 448.34 0.74 34.59 701.13

Total 616.63 2177.88 3763.41 358.16 1374.44 8290.52

Third Party Evaluation of Civil WorkState Govt. nominated Planning Department for third party evaluation of civil worksmore than cost of Rs 1.00 Crore. State PWD is doing third party evaluation of civil works costless than Rs. 1.00 Crore.Post Procurement ReviewThe World Bank has conducted Post Procurement Review (PPR) covering 07 samplecontracts awarded during April, 2012 to June, 2014 under RMSA in Uttarakhand. The keyfindings/issues of the report are follows: Minimum 30 days biding period was not providing. RMSA model bid document for open tendering was not used. Advised to revise the estimates before initiating the procurement process.State Government and SIS, RMSA has issued letters to implementing agencies forresolved the above issues.


( 26 )

(a) School Grant

The Cumulative Progress of School Grant

Year

Approved by GOI SPO Released

RemarkPhysicalUnit

cost inlakhs

TotalAmount

(in lakhs)Physical Audited

Expenditure2009-10 1760 0.14 246.40 1760 246.40 --2010-11 1770 0.50 885.00 1770 243.70 --2011-12 1879 0.50 939.50 1875 1061.65 4 schools were notfound eligible for grant2012-13 2078 0.50 1039.00 2078 1039.00 --2013-14 2062 0.50 1031.00 2062 1031.00 --2014-15 2066 0.50 1033.00 2062 1033.00 --2015-16 2184 0.50 1092.00 2179 1089.5 --2016-17 2233 0.50 1116.50 2221 1110.50 --Progress of School Grant 2016-17

S.No. Name of thedistrict

School GrantTarget 2016-17 Progress1 Almora 259 2592 Bageshwar 90 903 Chamoli 199 1994 Champawat 104 1035 Dehradun 165 1656 Haridwar 88 887 Nainital 188 1888 Pauri 300 3009 Pithoragarh 206 19910 Rudraprayag 109 10611 Tehri 279 27912 U.S. Nagar 123 12213 Uttarkashi 123 123

Total 2233 2221Status of sanctioned teachers and recruitment of teachers is follows:Upgraded Schools under RMSA

No.Upgraded

Schools

Sanctioned for NewSchools

Recruitment Progress ofHeadmasters & Teachers Vacant

HM SubjectTeachers Total HM Subject

Teachers Total HM SubjectTeachers Total

280 280 1562 1842 80 1330 1410 191 232 423

(b) Head Master/Principals In-service Training of Professional DevelopmentThe cumulative progress in this regard is as under:Head Master Training Progress 2009-10 to 2015-16

Year PhysicalTarget

AchievedTarget

Budget

RemarksReleasedby GoI in

lakhs

AuditedExpenditure2009-10 - 1772 - - 1 teacher and 1 principal wassensitized in teacher training


( 27 )

Year PhysicalTarget

AchievedTarget

Budget

RemarksReleasedby GoI in

lakhs

AuditedExpenditure2010-11 2195 2169 21.95 0.74 -2011-12 2149 1956 32.235 21.94 -2012-13 - - - - -2013-14 1033 968 15.49 14.522014-15 50 45 - - Conducted through NUEPA2015-16 225 223 10.80 10.702016-17 475 367 22.80 17.62

Source: DPO Office 2016-17State Institute of Educational Management and Administrative Training (SIEMAT) is thedesignated institution for conducting Head Teacher/Principal’s training in the State. GOI hasSanctioned 475 Principal training on leadership 2016-17. Training package has developed byNUEPA. The training is being provided by DIET'S. 367 head master/principals have completedthe training so far.(c) Teacher Training

Cumulative Teacher Training Progress 2009-10 to 2016-17

Intervention Year PhysicalTarget

AchievedTarget

BudgetReleased byGoI in lakhs

Audited Expenditurein lakhs

Teachertraining2009-10 3502 3544 35.02 -2010-11 17264 257 195.92 22.902011-12 14260 8677 213.90 109.992012-13 3694 1987 1987 29.802013-14 12924 7707 193.86 115.612014-15 68892015-16 4757 4329 142.71 129.872016-17 10647 9645 319.41 289.35

New TeacherTraining2009-10 - - - -2010-11 648 - 06.48 -2011-12 567 539 08.50 7.512012-13 1696 - - -2013-14 - - - -2014-15 225 1202015-16 - - - -2016-17 - - - -The GOI has sanctioned 10647 in service teacher training for the year 2016-17. SCERThas developed training package after TNA on Science, Maths, English, Hindi & Social Studies.Teacher training conducted at district/block level in the supervision of Nodal Officer-Block Education Officer/District Education Officer (Secondary) and faculty of SCERT. Theprogress of trained teachers as follows:

Progress of Trained Teacher 2016-17 (English, Hindi & Social Studies)

S.No. District EnglishTarget Progress Hindi

Target ProgressSocial

StudiesTarget

Progress1 Almora 254 236 212 212 260 2582 Bageshwar 74 66 64 55 90 783 Chamoli 157 166 142 171 199 1674 Champawat 77 77 65 65 105 935 Dehradun 220 212 170 204 165 1656 Haridwar 73 89 82 93 89 827 Nainital 188 180 247 190 188 202


( 28 )

S.No. District EnglishTarget Progress Hindi

Target ProgressSocial

StudiesTarget

Progress8 Pauri 274 274 228 259 302 3029 Pithoragarh 78 78 55 55 208 20810 Rudraprayag 98 98 71 71 109 10911 Tehri 245 210 186 181 282 23812 U.S. Nagar 175 118 148 111 123 12313 Uttarkashi 87 85 94 113 124 112Total 2000 1889 1764 1780 2244 2137

Source: DPO Offices

Progress of Trained Teacher 2016-17 (Maths & Science)

S.No. District MathsTarget Progress Science

Target Progress1 Almora 277 258 174 1572 Bageshwar 86 74 60 423 Chamoli 192 184 112 1024 Champawat 79 79 60 535 Dehradun 227 226 310 1856 Haridwar 104 106 80 867 Nainital 227 200 238 1578 Pauri 384 365 219 1889 Pithoragarh 218 104 171 12610 Rudraprayag 211 211 104 7111 Tehri 363 240 167 14712 U.S. Nagar 203 158 151 10013 Uttarkashi 147 91 75 129Total 2718 2296 1921 1543

Source: DPO Offices

(d) MT Training

Progress of MT Training 2016-17

S.No. District No. of MTs Progress1 Almora 50 502 Bageshwar 50 203 Chamoli 50 424 Champawat 50 445 Dehradun 50 426 Haridwar 50 187 Nainital 50 528 Pauri 50 509 Pithoragarh 50 3910 Rudraprayag 50 4611 Tehri 50 5012 U.S. Nagar 50 4113 Uttarkashi 50 50Total 650 544

Source: DPO Offices


( 29 )

(e) KRP Training

Progress of MT Training 2016-17

S.No. District No. of KRPs Progress1 Almora 5 52 Bageshwar 5 53 Chamoli 5 54 Champawat 5 55 Dehradun 5 56 Haridwar 5 57 Nainital 5 58 Pauri 5 59 Pithoragarh 5 510 Rudraprayag 5 511 Tehri 5 512 U.S. Nagar 5 513 Uttarkashi 5 5Total 65 65

Source: DPO Offices

(f) Science ExhibitionIt is necessary to organize science related activities at school level continuously for thepromotion of science. For this purpose every school conducted science related activities suchas science seminar, drama, exhibition, etc. which are mentioned in the list of NCERT. A Rs.5000.00 of school grant is being used in school level. This activity was a part of school timetable. There is a need to conduct activities for the promotion of science. Science Quiz, Sciencedrama and Science Fairs were organized at school block and district level.The progress of science exhibition in the year of 2016-17:-Progress of Science Exhibition 2016-17

S.No. District Target Achievement1 Almora 1 12 Bageshwar 1 13 Chamoli 1 14 Champawat 1 15 Dehradun 1 16 Haridwar 1 17 Nainital 1 18 Pauri 1 19 Pithoragarh 1 110 Rudraprayag 1 111 Tehri 1 112 U.S. Nagar 1 113 Uttarkashi 1 1Total 13 13

(g) Training for Community Leaders (SMDC Training)GOI has sanctioned 4720 SMDC members training from 236 schools for 2016-17. Thetopics selected for SMDC training are follow: Expectation of Community. Different Schemes Related to School, Scholarships and Financial Provision. My Role in School.


( 30 )

Resources in School.The above training was conducted in cascade model.SMDC Progress of 2016-17

S.No. Districts Target AchievementNo. of schools No. of

MembersNo. of schools No. of

Members1 Almora Almora 2 40 22 Bageshwar Bageshwar 0 0 03 Chamoli Chamoli 0 0 04 Champawat Champawat 7 140 75 Dehradun Dehradun 49 980 486 Haridwar Haridwar 27 540 277 Nainital Nainital 1 20 18 Pauri Pauri 8 160 89 Pithoragarh Pithoragarh 4 80 310 Rudraprayag Rudraprayag 10 200 1011 Tehri Tehri 67 1340 5112 U.S. Nagar U.S. Nagar 3 60 313 Uttarkashi Uttarkashi 58 1160 58Total 236 4720 218 4360

Source: DPO Offices

(h) Self defence Training for girlsGOI has sanctioned 183 schools for self defence and yoga in 2016-17 for girls. Theseschools were selected on the basis of availability of expert. The expert trained the girls beforeor after school hour with the concern of school principal. The expert selected by respectiveSMDC/SMC. The selected expert was certificate holder. A minimum of 30 girls per school wereselection criteria of school.Progress of Self Defence & Yoga 2016-17

S.No. District Target Progress1 Almora 15 152 Bageshwar 6 63 Chamoli 30 304 Champawat 4 45 Dehradun 25 256 Haridwar 18 187 Nainital 10 108 Pauri 15 159 Pithoragarh 12 1210 Rudraprayag 3 311 Tehri 18 1812 U.S. Nagar 21 2113 Uttarkashi 6 6Total 183 183

(i) Science KitThe Secondary Science Kit developed by NCERT/Local Market have been procured bythe schools the developed science related vision in the students studying in class IX and X. Theprocess to purchase the science kit is still in progress and the kit purchased by the districts sofar as follows:


( 31 )

Progress of Science Kit 2016-17S.No. Name of the district Target Progress1 Almora 87 872 Bageshwar 27 273 Chamoli 18 184 Champawat 38 385 Dehradun 12 126 Haridwar 89 887 Nainital 66 668 Pauri 100 1009 Pithoragarh 179 17910 Rudraprayag 96 9611 Tehri 124 12412 U.S. Nagar 24 2413 Uttarkashi 12 12

Total 872 871

(j) Maths KitThe Secondary Maths Kit developed by NCERT/Local Market have been procured by theschools the developed science related vision in the students studying in class IX and X. Theprocess to purchase the science kit is still in progress and the kit purchased by the districts sofar as follows:Progress of Science Kit 2016-17

S.No. Name of the district Target Progress1 Almora 22 222 Bageshwar 6 63 Chamoli 18 184 Champawat 8 85 Dehradun 28 286 Haridwar 89 887 Nainital 16 168 Pauri 100 1009 Pithoragarh 199 19910 Rudraprayag 6 611 Tehri 18 1812 U.S. Nagar 24 2413 Uttarkashi 12 12Total 546 545

(k) Excursion Trip for Student with in StateThe progress of excursion trip conducted for the students of class IX as follows:Progress of Excursion Trip for Student with in State 2016-17

S.No. Name of theDistricts

Target AchievementGovt. Schools Physical

(No. ofStudents)

Govt. Schools Physical (No.of Students)1 Almora 260 4974 260 49742 Bageshwar 90 1780 89 17803 Chamoli 199 3054 199 31544 Champawat 105 2000 103 20005 Dehradun 165 4043 59 4043


( 32 )


Target AchievementGovt. Schools Physical

(No. ofStudents)

Govt. Schools Physical (No.of Students)6 Haridwar 89 3000 59 29927 Nainital 188 4637 188 46378 Pauri 302 5169 111 51699 Pithoragarh 208 3463 199 346310 Rudraprayag 109 2651 106 265111 Tehri 282 4860 80 486012 U.S. Nagar 123 6251 123 625113 Uttarkashi 124 2394 76 2394

Total 2244 48276 1652 48368

(l) Exposure Visit outside StateThe progress of Exposure Visit for the students of class X as follows:Progress of Exposure Visit outside State 2016-17


(m) Kal UtsavKal Utsav programme has been conducted in four tiers namely school, block, district andstate level. In the State level programme which was held on 6th & 7th October, 2016 inDehradun. 490 Students have participated in the State level programme. All the district haveperformed their activity in theatre, music, dance and visual arts. After the completion of theprogramme at state level four teams have participated from 14th November, 2016 to 19thNovember, 2016 in New Delhi. 38 students from 04 Districts have participated in the KalaUtsav programme.(n) Unnati ProgrammeThe Unnati Programme is being carried out for the year 2016-17 as follows:

Progress of Unnati Programme 2016-17S.No. Name of the district Target Progress1 Almora 130 1122 Bageshwar 45 453 Chamoli 99 864 Champawat 52 525 Dehradun 82 82


( 33 )

S.No. Name of the district Target Progress6 Haridwar 44 447 Nainital 94 948 Pauri 150 1269 Pithoragarh 103 10310 Rudraprayag 54 5311 Tehri 140 14012 U.S. Nagar 61 5913 Uttarkashi 61 58Total 1115 1054*

* The programme is still in progress.

(o) Educational Backward Minorities Orientated Activities (Art & Craft)The Art & Craft activity has been conducted as follows:Progress of Educational Backward Minorities Orientated Activities (Art & Craft) 2016-17


(p) Inspiration/Motivation Camp for Girl StudentsThe Inspiration/Motivation Camps have been conducted in different blocks as follows:Progress of Inspiration/Motivation Camp for Girl Students 2016-17S.No. Name of the district Target Progress1 Almora 11 112 Bageshwar 3 33 Chamoli 9 34 Champawat 4 15 Dehradun 6 26 Haridwar 6 67 Nainital 8 88 Pauri 15 99 Pithoragarh 8 810 Rudraprayag 3 311 Tehri 9 312 U.S. Nagar 7 713 Uttarkashi 6 6

Total 95 70


( 34 )

(q) Complete School Management System (Shaala Darpan)190 Model Schools have been selected for the implementation of Complete SchoolManagement System. For the implementation of the programme MoU has been signed betweenUttarakhand Sabhi Ke Liye Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad and NIC/NICSI. The software is beingdeveloped by the working agency i.e. NIC/NICSI.(r) Enhancement of Learning Achievement (Arohan)The Enhancement of Learning Achievement (Arohan) Programme has been conductedas follows:

Physical Target Achievement Remark19310 (No. of Students) 19852 (No. of Students) The additional students have beencatered within the sanctionedbudget of GOI(s) Student wise Data base Management Information System (SDMIS) in sync with

U-DISENUEPA has initiated the child wise information collection of every student studying inclass 1-12 in all management schools. Data collection of every student in 35 points is to becollected in DCF format and all the data is to be uploaded online/offline mode in nationalserver.GOI has sanctioned to incur expenditure @ Rs. 1 per student for collection of child wisedata at secondary level from the MMER approved under RMSA by the PAB 2016-17.Under RMSA 697294 children are enrolled in all management schools in class 9-12. Theamount of Rs. 6.97 Lac disbursed to all Districts to complete the activities related to SDMIS.Amount allocated for SDMIS under MMER

S.No. District Enrollment Amount (In Rs.)1 Almora 51415 514152 Bageshwar 20149 201493 Chamoli 32143 321434 Champawat 19665 196655 Dehradun 120672 1206726 Haridwar 91233 912337 Nainital 64785 647858 Pauri 55760 557609 Pithoragarh 38561 3856110 Rudraprayag 20407 2040711 Tehri 49287 4928712 US Nagar 107287 10728713 Uttarkashi 25930 25930Total 697294 697294The amount of Rs. 1 per child is utilized by the Districts in –

Printing of DCF format Head Master/Teachers Training Hiring of Man Power for Punching of Data. Internet Connectivity, etc.

(t) National Programme on School Standards and Evaluation- NPSSE (Shaala Siddhi)National Programme on School Standards and Evaluation- NPSSE (Shaala Siddhi) waslaunched by hon’ble minister for Human Resource Development on 7th November 2015. ShaalaSiddhi a comprehensive instrument for school evaluation leading to School improvement hasbeen developed by the NUEPA.


( 35 )

It enables school to evaluate their performance in a more focused manner and facilitatesthem to make professional judgment for continues improvement. Shaala siddhi is implement inall 2250 Govt. Secondary and Senior Secondary Schools in State from 2016-17 and amount ofRs. 35.05 Lac is proposed to all Districts at Rs. 10 per child enrolled in all Govt. School.GOI has informed that part of the funds approval under MMER head of RMSA may beutilize to meet the cost of implementation of shaala siddhi in 2016-17. One day out of 16 daysSLDP Training of Head Masters and one session out of 3 days Training ofDEOs/Principals/Administrators is also earmarked for Shaala Siddhi Programme.Amount allocated for Shaala Siddhi under MMER

S.No. District No. of Govt.Schools Child Enrollment Amount in Lacs.1 Almora 260 38119 3.812 Bageshwar 90 13606 1.363 Chamoli 199 25944 2.594 Champawat 105 14437 1.445 Dehradun 166 30021 3.006 Haridwar 302 32662 3.267 Nainital 92 14933 1.498 Pauri 189 33461 3.349 Pithoragarh 208 26952 2.6910 Rudraprayag 109 16872 1.6811 Tehri 282 40554 4.0512 US Nagar 124 42282 4.2213 Uttarkashi 124 20739 2.07

Total 2250 350582 35.05The Funds under Shaala Siddhi has been utilized for : Printing of Shaala Siddhi module/ brochure/leaflet/evaluation dash board/flex Training of MRP/KRP/RP/MT Meeting and workshops in Districts/Block/Cluster/School Level Internet Connectivity for filling School Evaluation Dashboard/Online feeding of data. Monitoring of Schools by external evaluators. Training of Head Masters/DEOs and Administrator etc.

(u) Complete School Management System (Shaala Darpan)GOI has sanctioned budget of Rs. 38.00 lakh @ Rs. 20,000/- for designing the website tomonitor 190 model schools on daily basis. A tri party MoU has been signed between RMSA, NIC& NICSI to built the software and put into the web portal. Manpower will be hired from NICSIfrom financial year 2017-18 onward to complete the task after the approval of PAB.2.2.2 Girls Hostel

Implementation of schemeThe implementation of the scheme is being done by Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke LiyeMadhyamik Shiksha Parishad under umbrella of RMSA. State Irrigation department isnominated construction agency and prepared detail estimates and local specific deign for eachhostel. Government of India has approved site specific design and construction cost as per stateSOR for each in year 2012-13.A lady teacher from the KGBV in which the hostel is located or from the schools to whichthe hostel will be attached may be appointed as warden of the hostel. She will be paid an


( 36 )

honorarium as per the norms of the scheme in addition to her salary. She will also be entitledfor free family accommodation in the hostel.Each inmate has been provided with photo ID along with unique number in order toensure easy monitoring. On the back of the card, grievances redressal mechanism and contactnumbers and addresses of responsible persons is provided in the local language. StateGovernment also encouraged to set up free help lines for redressal of grievances.An ICT based Management System has been developed in consultation with StateGovernments so that the financial assistance can directly transferred in the account of eachstudent to be maintained by a public sector bank situated nearest to the institutions/hostels.According to census 1991 and 2001 there are 28 KGBVs are running in Uttarakhand.State Government took decision for continue the hostel and free boarding lodging facilities toall class VIII passed girls in all KGBVs till class XII, but only 19 KGBVs or EBBs are eligible forGirl Hostel scheme according to census 2001. State Government sanctioned 100 bedded girlshostel building in all rest 09 KGBVs and also bearing the recurring cost of all girls studying inthese hostels.GOI has sanctioned 19 girls hostel building in year 2013-14, State Project Office signedMOU with construction agency for each hostel individually. Construction agency prepared sitespecific detail estimate and designed for all girls hostel. After appraisal of detail estimates anddesign GOI sanctioned following amount an non-recurring grant for Girls Hostel.Progress of Girls Hostel 2016-17

S. No District Block Name of Girls Hostel No. of Students1 ALMORA DHAULADEVI GH CHAGETHI 242 DEHRADUN CHAKRATA GH TUINY 783 DEHRADUN KALSI GH KALSI 494 HARIDWAR ROORKEE GH BAJUHERI 245 HARIDWAR BHAGWANPUR GH BADIWALA 306 HARIDWAR KHANPUR GH GORDHANPUR 127 HARIDWAR BAHADARABAD GH RANIMAJRA 508 HARIDWAR NARSAN GH HARJOLLY JAT 169 HARIDWAR LAKSAR GH AKBARPUR UD 4410 TEHRI BHILANGANA GH RAUNSAL 3911 TEHRI JAUNPUR GH RAUTU KI BELI 2512 TEHRI NARENDRANAGAR GH AMPATA 5413 TEHRI PRATAPNAGAR GH SUJARGAON 4014 TEHRI THAULDHAR GH KAUSHAL 1215 U.S. NAGAR BAZPUR GH BAZPUR 3116 UTTARKASHI CHINYALISAUR GH DHANPUR 5017 UTTARKASHI MORI GH KHARSADI 3218 UTTARKASHI NAUGAON GH GANGNANI 3719 UTTARKASHI PUROLA GH KANDIYALGAON 54Total 701There are 701 girls residing in 19 Girls Hostels in current year. After completion ofconstruction of buildings, 100 Girls will be enrolled in each hostel from year 2017-18.

Financial Status (Non-Recurring)Rs. in Lakhs

S.No. Year Total SanctionAmount

ReleasedAmount Expenditure1 2012-13 3683.98 1888.02 -2 2013-14 - - 1094.753 2014-15 - 1283.90 306.844 2015-16 - 303.46 1215.775 2016-17 - - -


( 37 )

Financial Status (Recurring)Rs. in Lakhs

S.No. Year Total SanctionAmount

ReleasedAmount Expenditure1 2011-12 61.21 64.235 64.2352 2012-13 58.42 98.09 95.243 2013-14 107.09 53.54 83.804 2014-15 110.11 55.49 73.225 2015-16 273.79 129.09 98.516 2016-17 453.89 266.63 114.54

Construction Work Detail (Girls Hostel)(As on February 2017)

Sl.No District Block Place of Girls

Hostel

SanctionedAmount forCivil Work

Expenditure Progress1 Dehradun Kalsi Kalsi 175.95000 158.35500 Complete2 Dehradun Chakrata Tyuni 186.11000 167.49900 Complete3 Uttarkashi Mori Kharsari 198.82000 99.41000 In Progress4 U S Nagar Bajpur Bajpur 184.49000 166.04100 Complete5 Uttarkashi Naugaon Gangnani 196.57000 176.91300 Complete6 Uttarkashi Purola Kandiyal Gaon 194.91000 97.45500 In Progress7 Tehri Pratapnagar Sujad Gaon 179.53000 89.76500 In Progress8 Uttarkashi Chinyalisaur Dhanpur 176.02000 158.41800 In Progress9 Haridwar Lakasar Akbarpur Ud 189.07000 170.16300 Complete10 Haridwar Roorkee Bajuheri 189.33000 170.39700 Complete11 Haridwar Khanpur Goverdhanpur 167.20000 150.48000 Complete12 Haridwar Narsan HarjoliJatt 180.74000 162.66600 Complete13 Almora Dhauladevi Chagethi 191.45000 95.72500 In Progress14 Haridwar Bahadrabad Rani Majara 187.48000 168.73200 Complete15 Haridwar Bhagwanpur Badiwala 176.05000 158.44500 Complete16 Tehri Bhilangana Raunshal 208.70000 187.83000 Complete17 Tehri Narendra Nagar Aampata 197.80000 178.02000 Complete18 Tehri Jaunpur Rautu Ki Beli 186.62000 167.95800 Complete19 Tehri Tholdhar Kaushal 185.85000 167.26500 CompleteTotal 3552.69000 2891.53700Out of 19 Girls Hostel buildings 14 are completed 05 are under construction and will becompleted till March, 2017. State Govt. has decided to construct these hostels after rectificationof all difficulties. State Govt. is also constructing the 09 Girls Hostel building, where KGBVs arerunning but Girls Hostels are not approved by GOI.

Manpower in Girls HostelAccording to GOI guideline the following posts are sanctioned in Girls Hostel:-S.

No. Name of Post No. ofPost

Honorarium/month(In Rs.) Nature of Post1 Warden 19 5000/- On Deputation2 Head Cook 19 5150/- Out Sourcing3 Assistant Cook 38 4880/- Out Sourcing4 Chaukidar 19 5150/- Out SourcingWarden of KGBVs are also looking after the Girls Hostels. 18 Chaukidar, 18 Head Cook &36 Assistant Cook are in position. The contractual post is filled through Out Sourcing agency.State Government has constituted different committees for effective implementation ofGirls Hostel. Committees as follows:


( 38 )

(i) Management Committee SDM - Chairman Block Education Officer (BEO) - Vice-Chairman Principal of respected school where girls are studying - Secretary Warden & Other Members

(ii) Procurement Committee: BEO - Chairman Principal of respected school where girls are studying - Secretary Warden & Other Members

(iii) Out Sourcing Selection Committee: Chief Education Officer (CEO) - Chairman District Education Officer (Secondary) - Secretary Senior Lecturer, DIET - Member Other Members

2.2.3 Vocational Education

Activities carried out in 2015-16 80 Schools (40 Plain & 40 Hill) are selected in all 13 districts. Labs space identified in selected schools. SRG for vocational education constituted at state level. MOU signed with Wadhwani Foundation for providing technical assistance inimplementation of vocational education programme. MOU signed with NSDC for student's assessment & certification purpose. Awareness programmes for students/teachers/principals and SMDC's members areorganised at school level. Meeting with Uttarakhand Vidyalayee Shiksha Parishad, Ramnagar (ExaminationBoard) was organised for students assessment and certification in co-ordination withNSDC and Wadhwani Foundation. A NSQF CEll at Uttarakhand Vidyalayee Shiksha Parishad, Ramnagar has beenestablished. Uttarakhand Vidyalayee Shiksha Parishad, Ramnagar has integrated vocationaleducation subjects as a main core subjects at secondary and higher secondary level. State adopted PSSCIVE designed curriculum and reference materials. Books are printing in Hindi and English languages through SCERT. EOI floated for selection of Vocational Training Partners (VTP's)/agencies forimplementation of vocational education in schools. On the basis of EOI, RFP has designed and published to select the agencies forimplementation of vocational education. e-Tender were invited in 03 times for selection of implementing firm, but in previous 02bids due to insufficient number of tenders received, the bid has been not accepted. In 3rdtime single bid has received for 03 trades and 02 bids received for 01 trade (HealthCare). The executive committee has decided after the review of previous 02 e-Tenders, that ifin the 3rd time only 01 bid which fulfill the necessary norms will be considered. In caseno bid will received in 3rd time or no bidder will qualified then SIS RMSA will invite theempanelled Vocational Training Partners (VTPs) of National Skill DevelopmentCorporation (NSDC) and select the trade-wise VTP for programme. The executive committee has directed to SIS will execute the programme definitely fromApril, 2017. The list of equipment suggested by the PSSCIVE has been considered by StateGovernment and decides that need based list of equipment will be finalized by StateResource Group with help of NSDC & Wadhwani Foundation and procurement process


( 39 )

will be taken by SMDC/SMC as per RMSA Financial & Procurement Manual. The list oftrade-wise equipment is finalized by SRG.Responsibilities of VTPsThe service provider will be responsible for the following in the proposed programmecovering 44 secondary and senior secondary schools. Among these 25 schools are situated inplain area and 19 schools are situated in hilly area. The service provider shall:a) Ensure arrangement of maintenance of tools and equipments, software and e-learningmaterial as and when required.b) Ensure day-to-day requirements of stationary and other consumables for conductingthe classes.c) Provide resource persons including teachers/skill trainers, skill knowledge providers,industry coordinators, guest faculty as per requirement of the project.d) Provide 02 vocational teachers in selected school of plain and hilly area as per the trade.Initial requirement Year 1-Year 3 shall be of 01 teacher for class 9-10. If class XI-XII areadded to the program additional 1 teacher shall be deployed by the service provider.e) Ensure hands on skill training to students in industrial and commercial establishments.f) Ensure internal assessment of the students.g) Ensure theoretical and practical classes as per NSQF guidelines.h) Ensure students, parents, teachers and community mobilization in selected schools.i) Create awareness among the students, parents, teachers and community for thevocational education.j) Provide guidance and counselling services to the students as and when required.k) Ensure industry visit to the student for their improvement in practical exposure.l) Provide placement to the eligible students in related job market after passing out thelevel IV certificate.m) Organize minimum 20 guest faculty lecture in each relating subject/trade in everyselected schools.Another Activities Planned for Academic year 2016-171. Separate NSQF Cell at State for Vocational Education under SPO;2. Principal Training for selected schools;3. Online Portal for reporting management for Vocational Education Programme – Supportby NIC;4. Agreement with VTPs;5. Selection & recruitment of VTPs/Implementation Partners;6. Selection & recruitment of vocational teachers will be followed on the basis of PSSCIVEeducational qualification norms.7. Training of vocational teachers by trade-wise;8. Lab setup at school level;Another Activities Planned for Academic year 2017-18The Process to implement the programme in the year 2017-18 is in progress. Projectrollout in April, 2017.2.2.4 ICT@SchoolThe Govt. of Uttarakhand has initiated the process of integration of Information &Technology in education under the ‘Arohi’ Programme since 2001 to prepare the students fordigital future. Under this programme efforts were made to computerize every secondary andsenior secondary school in the state. More than 8000 computers have been provided todifferent Govt. and Govt. aided schools. The state government made provisions for teachers’computer training through various training programmes of Intel and Microsoft companies.


( 40 )

Educational content CDs have been provided to 34 schools and all DIETs of the state under e-class Project and we are further in the process to provide these content CDs to all schools ofUttarakhand.A comparative evaluation of 13 Pilot schools covered under e-class project had beenfurnished by the department on the basis of results of last three years and a progressive reportof the learning status of the students studying in e-class has been found. 125 schools of thestate have already been covered under the ICT Scheme throughout right purchase. Theimplementation of the scheme in the schools has empowered the learners for utilization andapplication of the skills, knowledge and understanding and teachers to use ICT as a tool tomake the teaching & learning process/classroom practices more interesting. Emphasis oflearning is shifting from acquiring information to constructing knowledge. Students are beingequipped to “learn to learn” and “How to learn” and also acquire the skills required forchanging nature of the work places.Steps taken by States/UTs for promotion of Computer EducationFor the better implementation of ‘ICT in Schools Scheme’ and to concentrate on betteroutputs of the scheme, previously an ‘ICT Cell’ has been established under the Director,Secondary Education, Uttarakhand. Now this scheme is implementing by Uttarakhand Sabhi KeLiye Madhyamik Shiksha Parisad, Uttarakhand and integrated work plan is developed for allCSS. A Project Monitoring Unit (PMU – ICT) has also been established at State Level formonitoring of the schools covered under ICT@Schools Scheme. For training, and guidance ofteachers to ensure the best use of ICT tools in schools, State government has also established a‘State Educational Information & Technology Academy’ (ITA). The ICT Programme among theschools is being implemented in the following manner.a) Extending computer literacy and awareness to every student.b) Enabling the teachers to enhance their subject knowledge and professional skills withthe use of ICT.c) Facilitating the teachers to use ICT as an aid for teaching learning process and to makethe classroom interactive and participatory.d) Enabling students to learn through ICT and provide facilities for interacting with theircounterparts across the country.Public Private Participation in ICTGovernment of Uttarakhand had signed a MoU with M/s. Microsoft and M/s. Intel fortraining of teachers and principals. As a result we could train more than 30,000 teachers whohave gone through these training programmes.M/s. S. Chand & Co. a private publisher has been entrusted with the responsibility ofdeveloping educational software in Physics, Chemistry, Biology and Mathematics subjects fromclass IX to XII. Coverage of 500 Schools sanctioned in 2010-11 under ICT@Schools Scheme(BOOT Model) is under process.Government of Uttarakhand involved IL&FS Education & Technology Service Ltd. toprovide teachers training under ICT. This firm is conducting teachers training for schoolsanctioned in year 2007-08 under ICT. The education department developed content with thehelp of this firm. Total 500 teachers are trained under this scheme.Programme Implementation & Monitoring SystemA state level ICT Cell has been established at Directorate School Education in previousyears for the implementation of the scheme. According to GOI guideline this scheme isintegrated with RMSA & Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke Liye Madhyamik Shiksha Parisad isimplementing this scheme from 2013-14. A Project Monitoring Unit (PMU) has beenestablished to monitor and manage the implementation of the ‘ICT in schools scheme’ inUttarakhand. Apart from that the ICT programme is also being monitored through the existinghierarchical Administrative structures. Substantial number of Principals has also been trained


( 41 )

in computers to enable them to monitor the computer programmes in the schools. As perprevious provisions, A Third Party Evaluation of equipments will be proposed for this project.Structure of PMU Cell-Post Sanctioned

S.No. Post Sanctioned Working1 Manager, Technology Management 01 02 Manager, Training & Human Resource 01 03 Computer Operator 01 04 Peon 02 0School Level wise Detail

S.No.

Year ofSanction Type of School Number of Schools Sanctioned

Govt. Govt. aided Total1 2005-06 Secondary school 0 0 0Higher Secondary school 25 0 252 2007-08 Secondary school 2 0 2Higher Secondary school 98 0 983 2010-11 Secondary school 15 0 15Higher Secondary school 485 0 485Total 625 0 625

Financial Progress(Rs. in Lakhs)

Financial YearFund Received Expenditure Up to

March 2014 BalanceGOI State Total

2007-08 301.50 27.77 329.27 597.86 63.54150.00 14.63 164.63151.50 16.00 167.50Total 603.00 58.40 661.40 581.78 79.622010-11 500.00 166.67 666.67 0.00 666.67

Grand Total 1103.00 225.07 1328.07 581.78 746.29Government of India has not sanctioned any fund from year 2014-15.Activity carried out in 2013-14In the year 2013-14 teachers trained for the schools approved 2007-08 in 100 schools.Activities Carried Out in 2014-15

Empowered Group of Ministers (EGM) approved RFP for ICT. RFP floated on 9th Sep., 2013. Suggestions from bidders came in pre bid meeting on 20th Sep., 2013. Revised RFP approved by EC (10th Jan., 2014) and also approved by Hon'ble CM (4thMar., 2014). RFP floated on 3rd Apr., 2014 but bit not received. Conference of firms/agencies organised on 8th Jul., 2014 about RFP document, aftersuggestions of bidders revised RFP submitted to Govt. for approval. Bid invite shortly. 625 Teacher are trained in 05 days In Service Training programme under RMSA aboutICT from 125 ICT covered. Training Module have been developed by SPO. KRPs and MTs are trained at State Level. Teachers Training imparted at District Level.


( 42 )

2.2.5 Inclusive Education for Disabled at Secondary Stage (IEDSS)The CWSN students studying in Govt. and aided schools are being covered by IEDSSscheme. For year 2016-17 the total 1483 students are identified through U-DISE data. Campwere organized at district level with the help of CMO for the identification of degree ofdisability.Target GroupThe scheme will cover all children of age 14+ passing out of elementary schools andstudying in secondary stage in Government, local body and Government-aided schools, withone or more disabilities as defined under the Persons with Disabilities Act (1995) and theNational Trust Act (1999) in the age group 14+ to 18+ (classes IX to XII), namely

Blindness Low vision Leprosy cured Hearing impairment Locomotors disabilities Mental retardation Mental Illness Autism Cerebral PalsyAnd may eventually cover (i) Speech impairment and (ii) Learning Disabilities, etc.Girls with disabilities will receive special focus and efforts would be made under thescheme to help them gain access to secondary schools, as also to information and guidance fordeveloping their potential.

Components of the Scheme1. It is proposed to provide for educational facilities under this scheme for all childrenwith disabilities that are included in general schools at the secondary and seniorsecondary level (classes IX to XII).2. The Scheme will include assistance for two kinds of components, viz.:-I. Student-oriented components, andII. Other components (e.g. those relating to infrastructure, teacher training, awarenessgeneration, etc.)For the first group of components, it is proposed to provide assistance to States/UnionTerritories/Autonomous bodies @ Rs. 3000/- per disabled child per annum for specified items.Total funds status released by GOI

S.No. Year

Sanctionedamount fromGOI (in Lakh)

Releasedamount

from GOI(in Lakh)

Utilizedamount

(in Lakh)Remark

1. 2010-11 279.83 139.91 _ GOI released on 28th March 2011.Soamount could not utilized in 2010-11.2. 2011-12 788.43 _ 116.79 The released amount of 2010-11 hasbeen utilized3. 2012-13 492.11 - 13.46 Funds not Released4. 2013-14 168.82 _ 8.03+94.60= 102.63 Funds not Released. Rs. 94.60 lakhhas been released from GOI for year2010-11 for construction of resourcerooms.5. 2014-15 171.59 95.88 62.13 Audited


( 43 )

S.No. Year

Sanctionedamount fromGOI (in Lakh)

Releasedamount

from GOI(in Lakh)

Utilizedamount

(in Lakh)Remark

6. 2015-16 136.20 29.20 98.54 Rs. 40.98 lakhs still awaited from GOIfor 07 months salary of 36 specialteachers.7. 2016-17 166.067 84.70 84.70 The second installments still awaited.So only 08 months salary for specialteachers and 50% amount ofenvironment building programmehave been given to districts.

Financial Status for Year 2016-17

Status of Identification and Enrolment of Disabled Children (Disability Wise)S.No. Disability B G T1 Visual Impairment (Blindness) 23 36 592 Visual Impairment (Low Vision) 164 128 2923 Hearing Impairment 52 60 1124 Speech Impairment 64 48 1125 Loco Motor Impairment 400 339 7396 Mental Retardation 46 51 977 Cerebral Parsy 9 7 168 Autism 2 3 59 Mental Illness 18 33 51

Total 778 705 1483

Implementation for year 2016-17

Students Oriented Components

Identification, Profiling, Assessment and CertificationIn the year 2016-17, 1483 children assessed with help of Chief Medical Officers ofrespective district as follows:District wise assessed Children

S.N. District Target Achievement1 ALMORA 76 762 BAGESHWAR 100 273 CHAMOLI 95 444 CHAMPAWAT 103 975 DEHRADUN 184 1026 HARIDWAR 96 967 NAINITAL 68 448 PAURI 130 469 PITHORAGARH 91 4610 RUDRAPRAYAG 70 2411 TEHRI 140 1212 U.S. NAGAR 249 5713 UTTARKASHI 81 81Total 1483 752


( 44 )

Aids and AppliancesIn the year 2016-17 for aids and appliances Rs. 7.02 lakh has been release to district asfollows:District wise Aids and Appliances

S.N. District Target Achievement1 Almora 49 252 Bageshwar 79 163 Chamoli 60 124 Champawat 66 245 Dehradun 75 656 Haridwar 65 197 Nainital 42 408 Pauri 74 209 Pithoragarh 73 1510 Rudraprayag 35 1411 Tehri 96 1812 US Nagar 164 2513 Uttarkashi 50 12Total 928 305

Stipend for GirlsBudget of Rs. 7.00 lakh has been released to districts for year 2016-17.S. No. Name of District Target Achievement1 ALMORA 29 292 BAGESHWAR 19 193 CHAMOLI 24 244 CHAMPAWAT 16 165 DEHRADUN 71 716 HARIDWAR 19 197 NAINITAL 18 188 PAURI 34 349 PITHORAGARH 22 2210 RUDRAPRAYAG 24 2411 TEHRI 19 1912 U.S. NAGAR 35 3513 UTTARKASHI 20 20

Total 350 350

Escort Allowance for Blind GirlsBudget of Rs. 1.296 lakh has been released to districts for year 2016-17.S. No. Name of District Target Achievement1 Almora 1 12 Chamoli 1 13 Champawat 5 54 Dehradun 21 215 Haridwar 2 26 Nainital 1 17 Pithoragarh 2 28 Tehri 1 19 U.S. Nagar 2 2

Total 36 36


( 45 )

UniformBudget of Rs. 4.09 lakh has been released to districts for year 2016-17.S. No. Name of District Target Achievement1 ALMORA 75 752 BAGESHWAR 41 413 CHAMOLI 39 394 CHAMPAWAT 36 365 DEHRADUN 116 1026 HARIDWAR 57 577 NAINITAL 32 328 PAURI 77 779 PITHORAGARH 51 3710 RUDRAPRAYAG 40 4011 TEHRI 55 5012 U.S. NAGAR 73 7313 UTTARKASHI 52 52

Total 744 711

Books and StationeryBudget of Rs. 4.09 lakh has been released to districts for year 2016-17.S. No. Name of District Target Achievement1 ALMORA 75 752 BAGESHWAR 41 413 CHAMOLI 39 394 CHAMPAWAT 36 365 DEHRADUN 116 1026 HARIDWAR 57 577 NAINITAL 32 328 PAURI 77 779 PITHORAGARH 51 3710 RUDRAPRAYAG 40 4011 TEHRI 55 5012 U.S. NAGAR 73 7313 UTTARKASHI 52 52

Total 744 711

Other Components-Environment Building ProgrammeBudget of Rs. 4.25 lakh has been released to districts for year 2016-17.S. No. Name of District Target Achievement1 ALMORA 11 62 BAGESHWAR 3 23 CHAMOLI 9 54 CHAMPAWAT 4 25 DEHRADUN 6 36 HARIDWAR 6 37 NAINITAL 8 48 PAURI 15 79 PITHORAGARH 8 410 RUDRAPRAYAG 3 211 TEHRI 9 412 U.S. NAGAR 7 313 UTTARKASHI 6 3

Total 95 48


( 46 )

Teacher Component

Appointment of Special Educator36 Special Teachers have been appointed in the State. Budget of Rs. 51.84 has beenreleased to districts for year 2016-17. The GOI has released the 47% of sanctioned amount forthe year 2016-17 so far and this amount has already been provided to districts to commencethe sanctioned activities. Therefore due to lack of funds the process to depute 59 new specialeducators could not commenced.S. No. Name of District Target Achievement1 BAGESHWAR 3 32 CHAMOLI 2 23 CHAMPAWAT 3 34 DEHRADUN 6 65 HARIDWAR 6 66 PAURI 7 77 PITHORAGARH 7 78 TEHRI 2 2

Total 36 36

2.3 Project Management"Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke Liye Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad" has been constituted underSocieties Registration Act, 1960 on 7th February 2009 with reference to the chapter 8 subsection 8.2 of the guidelines as prescribed by Govt. of India. The main objective of theformation of the Society is for functioning, monitoring and quality education in schooleducation with regard to different schemes assisted by the State and the Central Govt. likeRashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA), Information and Communication Technology(ICT), Inclusive Education for Disabled at Secondary Stage (IEDSS), Girls hostel & VocationalEducation etc.To achieve the goal of the Society following committees have been constituted:2.3.1 General Assembly1 Chief Minister, Uttarakhand Chairman (Ex-officio)2 School Education Minister, Uttarakhand Vice chairman (Ex-officio)3 Other Members Member4 Director General, School Education Member Secretary (Ex-officio)2.3.2 Executive Committee1 Chief Secretary, Govt. of Uttarakhand Chairman (Ex-officio)2 Additional Chief Secretary School Education, Govt. ofUttarakhand Vice Chairman (Ex-officio)3 Other Members Member4 Director General/State Project Director, RMSA Secretary (Ex-officio)2.3.3 State Programme Committee1 Additional State Project Director, RMSA Chairman2 Representative of NUPA, NCERT, SCERT, SIEMAT,Garhwal and Kumaun University Members3 Finance Controller, SPO, RMSA Member4 Joint State Project Director SPO, RMSA Member Secretary2.3.4 Sub-committees of the Executive CommitteeThe manual of the Society vide section 44 confers the Executive Committee, the right toconstitute different sub-committees to conduct the different programmes and delegate the


( 47 )

powers to these committees. Hence, the Finance Committee and the Programme MonitoringCommittees have been constituted as subcommittees by the Executive Committee:2.3.4.1 Finance Committee1 Principal Secretary Finance, Govt. of Uttarakhand Chairman2 Secretary School Education, Govt. of Uttarakhand Member3 Other Members Member4 Director General/State Project Director RMSA Secretary MemberThe main objective of the Finance Committee is to scrutinize the proposals financially,Financial approval for new programmes to be under taken, advising the Executive Committeeon financial matters and all other duties as assigned by the Chairman of the ExecutiveCommittee.2.3.4.1 Programme Monitoring Committee1 Secretary School Education, Govt. of Uttarakhand Chairman2 Additional Secretary Finance, Govt. of Uttarakhand Member3 Other Members Member4 Director General/State Project Director, RMSA Member SecretaryThe Main objective of the Programme Monitoring Committee is to prepare the plan andensure functioning and monitoring as per the rights and duties delegated by the Chairman ofthe Executive Committee. The Chairman of Programme Monitoring Committee as beendelegated the right to take the prompt decision in favour of the project under instantaneousneeds and get the decisions endorsed in the forthcoming meeting of Executive Committee.2.3.5 District Project CommitteeDistrict Project Committee of RMSA has been constituted at the District Level under thechairmanship of the concerned District Magistrate.1 District Magistrate Chairman2 Chief Education Officer Vice Chairman3 Other Members Member4 District Education Officer (Secondary)/ District Project Officer Member Secretary2.3.6 School Level Committee

2.3.6.1 School Management and Development CommitteeAt the school level, a School Management and Developments Committee (SMDC)constituted, which is be responsible for making the perspective and annual work plans at theschool level. A savings bank account is opened in the name of the concerned SMDC of everyschool in the nearby branch of any nationalized bank. The following is the structure isproposed for SMDC at the school level:1 Principal Chairman2 Senior teacher Member Secretary3 Teacher (Social Science) Member4 Teacher (Science) Member5 Teacher (Mathematics) Member6 Male Guardian Member7 One Female Guardian Member8 Two Panchayat Member/Ward Member Member9 One representative of SC/ST Category Member10 One representative of Educationally backward cadre Member11 One Member of Mahila Dal Member12 One Member of Education Development Committee ofevery village resaved by school Member13 Three members with science, art and cultural Member


( 48 )

background Nominated by DPO/DEO14 One Education Office Nominated by DEO Member15 One representative of Finance and Accounts MemberThe meeting of SMDC is held minimum once in every three month. SMDC is comprisedof two subcommittees-(1) School Construction Monitoring Committee(2) Educational Committee.These committee is constituted as follows:2.3.6.2 School Construction & Monitoring CommitteeThe Committee takes stock of the School Planning, estimates, management inspections,monitoring, reporting, maintenance of accounts, and presentation of accounts in the meetingsof SMDC and village education committee. The committee is be as follows:1 Principal Chairman2 Member Panchayat (nominated by GramPradhan/ward member (urban area) Member3 One Guardian nominated by PTA Member4 Junior Engineer(expertise in construction work) Member Secretary5 One member of Finance and Account cadre MemberThe meeting of school construction committee is be held once in every three months.The committee monitors the different construction works being under taken in the schoolregularly.2.3.6.3 Academic CommitteeThe committee is responsible for all educational activities, planning, management,monitoring, supervision, SEMIS, quality education, equity, children with special needs, student-teacher attendance, teacher training, guidance & Counselling, student achievement andcurricular activities. The members of the committee are as follows:1 Principal Chairman2 Guardians of one student studying in allsecondary classes Member3 One Astt. Teacher each of the following subjects:Science/Maths, Social Science, Language(Hindi/English), Art/Physical Education Member

4 One member to be nominated by the Principal Member Secretary2.3.7 Parent-Teacher AssociationParents Teacher Association is constituted in every school. The meeting of thisassociation is held minimum once in every month. Every teacher maintains a register in whichsuggestions and complaints of the guardians will be registered and the principal sees andinsures that actions are taken as per suggestions and complaints, regularly. This register isproduced in the monthly meetings of SMDC.2.3.8 Planning ProcessFor Effective planning of RMSA, the State has adopted four tier planning process.1. Creation of Planning Core Group at different LevelPlanning Committee are created at different levels, comprising of project functionaries,education department functionaries, other department functionaries, NGO's representatives,public representatives and parents there are:-

State Level Planning Committee District Level Planning Committee


( 49 )

School Level Planning Committee2. Orientation and Capacity Building of Planning CommitteeAll of the members of these committees are trained for their capacity buildingpertaining to planning and implementation issues.2.3.9 Project ImplementationState Project Office at state level and District Project Office at district level areestablished for project implementation. Block Education Officer is nominated as Ex-Officio,Block Project Officer at block level. Employees are deputed on deputation or outsourcing basisin State Project Office and District Project Office, State Government rules and regulations ondeputation or rules and regulations of outsourcing agency are applicable on the same. The lienof employee is maintained in his/her department on deputation. The detail of sanctioned postat different level is following:

Sanctioned, Working & Vacant Posts under RMSA(As on February, 2017)

Name ofOffice Details of Post Sanctioned Working Vacant Type of Posting

UttarakhandSabhi Ke LiyeMadhyamikShikshaParishad, StateProject Office,Dehradun

State Project Director 01 01 0 Ex-Officio, DirectorGeneral, SchoolEducationAdditional State ProjectDirector 01 01 0 Ex-Officio, AdditionalDirector DirectorateGeneral, SchoolEducationFinance Controller 01 01 0 Ex-Officio, FinanceController, SSAJoint State Project Director 02 02 0 DeputationFinance Officer 01 00 01 DeputationExecutive Engineer 01 01 0 Contract BasisAssistant State ProjectDirector 04 03 01 DeputationAssistant Engineer 01 01 0 Contract BasisAdministrative Officer 01 01 0 DeputationAccountant 01 01 0 DeputationComputer Operator 03 03 0 OutsourcingPeon 03 02 01 OutsourcingDistrictProject Office,UttarakhandSabhi Ke LiyeMadhyamikShikshaParishad

District Project Officer 13 13 0 Ex-Officio, ADEO(Madhyamik)District Resource Person(Academic, Evaluation &Innovation) 13 11 02 DeputationDistrict Resource Person(Construction, Planning &SEMIS) 13 02 11 DeputationAssistant Account Officer 13 04 08 DeputationAccountant 13 05 0 DeputationComputer Operator 13 13 0 OutsourcingBlock ProjectOffice Block Project Officer 95 95 0 Ex-Officio, BlockEducation OfficerExecutive Committee of SIS met on 10 January, 2014 and approved the following postfor internal audit of scheme:S.

No. Name of Post No. ofPost Pay Scale Nature of Post1 Assistant Audit Officer 01 9300-15600, 4800 Deputation/Contract2 Senior Auditor 01 9300-15600, 4200 Deputation


( 50 )

3 Computer Operator 01 12000/- Per Month Out Sourcing4 Peon 01 8000/- Per Month Out SourcingICT Cell at SPO LevelThe State Govt. of Uttarakhand had issued a GO no. 1754/XXIV-3/13/2(168)05 T.C.,Dated 6th February, 2014 to establish the PMU-ICT at state level for implementation of ICT.

S.No. Name of Post No. of

Post Pay Scale Nature of Post1 Manager, TechnologyManagement 01 50000/- Per Month Contract2 Manager, Training &Human Resource 01 40000/- Per Month Contract3 Computer Operator 01 12000/- Per Month Out Sourcing4 Peon/Chaukidar 02 8000/- Per Month Out SourcingIEDSS Cell at SPO Level


Post Pay Scale Nature of Post1 Deputy Director 01 9300-15600, 6600 Deputation2 Psychologist 01 30000/- Per Month Out Sourcing3 Stenographer 01 12000/- Per Month Out Sourcing4 LDC 01 12000/- Per Month Out SourcingMonitoring and supervisionFor effective implementation of project bottom-approach a monitoring is adopted bythe state.School LevelAt the school level SMDC has been formed. It has two sub committees i.e. Civil workMonitoring Committee and Academic Committee. It main functions will be monitoring andsupervision of the activities related to school.

Activities MonitoringAgency

Member Steps to be takenCivil Work ConstructionMonitoringCommittee Principal Functionaries ofSchool InfrastructuralDevelopmentcommittee JE of constructionagency

Monitoring and reportingweekly/monthly progress to block anddistrict level. Monitoring of school planning.

Academic SchoolAcademicCommittee Member of academicCommittee Monitoring of academic aspectsrelated to quality improvement. To assesses the child progress. Monitoring of Management, teaching-learning processes and schooladministration. Result obtained. Action plan

Block LevelBlock Education Officer will be responsible for all administrative and academic work atthe block level.Activities Monitoring

AgencyMember Steps to be takenCivil Work, Block JE Civil work Monitoring and reporting at the three


( 51 )


Member Steps to be takenFinancial,Academic,Planning EducationOffice andExternalAgencies B.E.O. RegionalEducation officers. levels of construction:

o Plinth level.o Door band level.o Lintel level.

Monthly reporting at the district. Collection and verification of SIEMS data. Monitor and supervise all the academicand administrative activities.

District LevelThe district project committee has been formed in the chairmanship of districtmagistrate. Its role is to monitor and implement all kinds of activities under the perspectiveplan and AWP&B. Additional District Education Officer (Secondary) will be the district projectofficer and his role will be monitor and supervise all activities. District Education Officer will bethe patron of RMSA of all administrative and academic work will be done by DEO.Activities Monitoring

AgencyMember Steps to be takenInfrastructural DPO andExternalAgencies A.E. Civil work

District ResourcePerson (Planningand civil work) Supervision of work according tomap design. Monitoring of qualitative aspect ofcivil work. Testing the quality of material. Reporting to DPO. Spot verification of the civil work. Quarterly/monthly progress of civilwork and reporting. Monitoring of quality of construction. To insure quality work. Action Taken. To check the quality work andreporting. Supervision and Monitoring of SEMISdata. Support to SMDC/SMC.Financial DPO Assistant Finance andAccount officers To prepare monthly and quarterlyprogress report. Physical verification of the spot andfinancial records. Implementation of the suggestions ofthe audit report. Monitoring of all the financial aspectsat the district and school levels. To monitor school level account,audit and progress.Academic DPO and DIET District ResourceGroup

DIET (05 subjectexperts) District Resourceperson (Academic,Evaluation andInnovations)

Supervision, monitoring andreporting of all the academicactivities. To monitor school level academicactivities. To monitor the implementation ofteacher training in classroomprocess.Planning SPO and DIET Functionaries of DIETand SPO Monitoring and Supervision of SEMISdata.


( 52 )


Member Steps to be taken

Monitoring of the norms set up bythe central govt. Appraisal of district plans. Monitoring of the implementation ofthe plan according to the set target.

District Project Monitoring CommitteeDistrict Project Management Committee formed in every district as per GOI instructionin chairmanship of senior MP/MLA of relative district. This committee reviewed theimplementation of all CSS.State level monitoring


Member Steps to be takenCivil Work SPO, UttarkhandSabhi Ke LiyaMadhyamikShiksha Parishad Executive Engineer J.D. Planning and Civilwork External Agency Construction Agency(Irrigation Department &Rural Engineering Service,Uttarakhand) ASPD (Construct Work) External MonitoringAgency

Supervision of work according tomap design. Monitoring of qualitative aspect ofcivil work. Testing the quality of material. Reporting to SPO. Release of the Budget. Spot verification of the civil work. Quarterly/monthly progress ofcivil work and reporting. Monitoring of quality ofconstruction. To insure quality work. Action Taken.Finance SPO, UttarkhandSabhi Ke LiyaMadhyamikShiksha Parishad

Finance Controller Account Officer Statutory Audit byexternal firm Performance Audit Social Audit by localbodies

To prepare monthly and quarterlyprogress report. Allocation of the budget from timeto time according to the proposal. Physical verification of the spotand financial records. Implementation of thesuggestions of the audit report. Monitoring of all the financialaspects at different levels.Academic SCERT, BoardSPO, SRG(Academic) Functionaries of

SCERT Board J.D. Academic (SPO) ASPD (Academic) ASPD (Innovation)

Monitoring of quality of all theacademic aspects Curriculum and text books. Teachers training. Remedial Teaching. Continuous and comprehensiveevaluation. Research and action research. Guidance and Counseling. Innovative activities. Teaching learning process. Learning Resource Centers. Classroom process. Quality education of children withspecial needs. Monthly/quarterly/yearlyreporting and monitoring of all


( 53 )


Member Steps to be takenthe activities for qualitativeimprovement.Planning SIEMAT and SPO Functionaries of SIEMAT ASPD JSPD (Plan) ASPD (Plan) ASPD (MIS)

Monitoring and Supervision ofSEMIS data. Monitoring of the quality of theplan. Monitoring of the norms set up bythe central govt. Appraisal of district plans. Monitoring of the implementationof the plan according to the settarget. Monitoring of the quality of thetraining of managerialfunctionaries.Administrative Directorate Directorate of SchoolEducation Implementation of the suggestionsbased on monitoring report.StatesInternalmission Board, SCERT,SSA, SIEMAT,Directorate andUniversity

One member from Board,SCERT, SPD (SSA), SIEMATDirectorate of SchoolEducation, UniversitymembersA review mission will monitor allthe activities in every six month.

StateResourcegroups SRG Subject experts, financeexperts, NGO's, Educationist,PRI, member, experts ofnational academic andplanning agenciesTo provide suggestions to SPOregarding preparing the plan andits implementations.

School Education Department of Uttarakhand prepared a monitoring calendar for blockand district level officials. Director General of School Education, Uttarakhand organizedmonthly review meetings of CEOs and DEOs about school monitored.S.No. Designation Schools allotted for monitoring

per monthRemark

1. CEO 10 (05 Secondary schools + 05Elementary schools) O4 Durgam +06 Sugam category2. DEO/DPO(RMSA) 10 O4 Durgam +06 Sugam category3. BEO 15 (06 Secondary schools + 09Elementary schools) O6 Durgam +09 Sugam category4. DRP 10 O4 Durgam +06 Sugam category

MMER

State Level Activities Under MMERActivity Brief about activity

1 Research & Evaluation1.1 Third Party Evaluation of Civil Work Quality control and implementation1.2 Research Study 1- Impact of in service teacher training2- Survey of Out of school children3- Impact of library and integrated lab in learningenhancement2 Planning Monitoring and Supervision2.1 Monthly Review Meeting of District LevelOfficers at SPO Review of RMSA activities in State/district.


( 54 )

Activity Brief about activity2.2 Orientation Workshop & Seminar Meeting of SRGs.Workshop on TNA conducted.2.3 Preparation of AWP&B Workshop on AWP&B preparation2.4 Approval of AWP&B Meeting of Appraisal Team2.5 Capacity Building Programme Organisation capacity building programme for SPOand DPO functionaries2.6 Monitoring Civil Work Field visit and third party evaluation of civil work2.7 Field Visit of SPO Officials For physical verification and awareness building ofSPO official study tour and exposer visit willorganised.3 Management and Quality3.1 Salary For all SPO staff.3.2 Capacity Building Programme for ProjectFunctionaries 26 DRPs and 13 DPOs, 13 AAOs and 13 computeroperators will oriented.3.3 Strengthening of MIS (U-DISE) Printing of DCF and data entry, purchasing ofcomputers and other accessories.3.4 Innovation & other Activities Innovative activities for quality improvement3.5 Examination Reform Workshop implementation and sharing of CCE3.6 School Environment Building Introduced school grading system3.7 Analysis of Examination Result Analysis of IX class examination result of 04 coresubjects3.8 Other Office Expenses All Office Expensive, Printing of Various Formats &Registers, Brocers, Pamphlets etc., AWP&BPreparation, TADA, Vehicles Hiring, POL,Contingency, Consultancy etc.

District Level Activities Under MMERActivity Brief about activity1 Monitoring Activities 1. Monitoring of all project works by BEO.2. Civil work monitoring by technical person.3. Monitoring by DIET faculty.2 Research and Evaluation As per proposal of district.3 Salaries All DPO functionaries4 TA/DA For DPO5 Contingency For DPO6 Office Equipments For DPO7 Hiring of Vehicle For DPO

Chapter - 3 : Sector Diagnosis - Current Status, Challenges and Priorities

( 55 )

Chapter - 3Sector Diagnosis - Current Status, Challenges and Priorities

3.1 Demands for Secondary EducationThis chapter presents the analysis of the status of secondary education in Uttarakhandto assess the starting points for RMSA in the state and identify the main issues for policy andpractice.Data sources and limitationsThe status report on secondary education in the state of Uttarakhand used the datasource from the Census of India, Statistical Abstract of Uttarakhand, Selected EducationalStatistics (SES) of Uttarakhand, and data collected through the data capture formats of UnifiedDistrict Information System In Education (U-DISE).In 2007, when MHRD was fine tuning RMSA, the National University of EducationalPlanning and Administration (NUEPA) was roped in to create a Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA)like monitoring system wherein the District Information on School Education (DISE) isinstrumental. The NUEPA first developed a software viz., Secondary Education ManagementInformation System (SEMIS) to prepare a baseline status report so that the planning forsecondary education could be made at district level onwards from the year 2012-13 the DISEelementary level and the semis at the secondary level were unified and the data collectedthrough the U-DISE.PopulationAccording to the Census 2011, the size of the state population was about 101.16 lakhs.

Table 3.1 Population and Growth Rate(Figures in lakhs)

Year Population Growth Growth Rate1981 57.72 - -1991 71.27 13.55 23.482001 84.89 13.61 19.202011 101.16 16.27 19.17Table 1.2 indicates the population figure at a glance this shows that there are 963females per 1000 male according to Census 2011. The female share in the total population ofthe state is about 49.05 percent. Table 1.2 shows that density of population is 189 per sq.kmaccording to Census 2011. Population density in the 13 district of the State varies from a highof 817 per sq.km in Haridwar to a low of 41 per sq.km. in district Uttarkashi. The population issparsely populated in hilly area and densely populated in plain areas. In terms of urbanization,about 30.91 lakhs consisting of 30.55 percent of the total population in the state are located inurban localities. The decadal population growth rate of population is 19.17% between 2001and 2011. The geographical area of the state is about 53,483 sq.km.

Status of Educational Institutions in Uttarakhand

Table 3.2 No. of Primary and Upper Primary SchoolsS.

No.Type of School No. of Schools

Primary only Upper Primary Only Primary with Upper Primary1 Governments 12593 2801 152 Govt. Aided 10 195 93 Un Aided 2690 421 1730Total 15293 3417 1754

Source: U-DISE 2016-17


( 56 )

Table 3.3 District wise Secondary and Hr./Sr. Secondary Schools by School CategoryS. No. District Secondary Higher Secondary Total1 Almora 118 221 3392 Bageshwar 43 79 1223 Chamoli 112 145 2574 Champawat 60 81 1415 Dehradun 147 328 4756 Haridwar 101 162 2637 Nainital 100 209 3098 Pauri 150 279 4299 Pithoragarh 111 155 26610 Rudraprayag 47 101 14811 Tehri 123 214 33712 U.S. Nagar 149 200 34913 Uttarkashi 67 91 158

Total 1328 2265 3593Source: U-DISE 2016-17

Table 3.4 Schooling Structure (Total schools)Sl.No.


withClass I

to X

No. ofSchools

withClass Ito XII

No. ofSchools

withClass

V/VI toX

No. ofSchools

withClass VI

to XII

No. ofSchools

withClass

VIII/IXto X

No. ofSchools

withClass

VIII/IXto XII

No. ofSchools

withClass XI

to XII

TotalSchool



Table 3.5 Number of Schools having classes IX-X by Management/Funding wiseSl.No.

District No. ofSchool

s

Dept. ofEducation

Tribal/Social

WelfareDept.

LocalBody

Pvt.Aided

Un-AidedSchools

CentralGovt.

Madarsa

1 ALMORA 339 261 0 1 40 34 3 02 BAGESHWAR 122 90 0 0 16 13 3 03 CHAMOLI 256 200 1 0 22 28 5 04 CHAMPAWAT 141 105 0 0 9 23 4 05 DEHRADUN 474 165 5 2 55 225 21 16 HARDWAR 257 89 0 0 56 106 4 27 NAINITAL 308 188 1 0 34 80 5 08 GARHWAL 429 303 0 1 75 46 4 09 PITHORAGARH 266 208 3 0 9 42 4 010 RUDRAPRAYAG 148 109 0 0 28 9 2 011 TEHRI 336 287 0 0 14 32 3 012 U.S. NAGAR 341 123 5 0 27 162 2 2213 UTTARKASHI 158 125 0 0 3 27 3 0Total 3575 2253 15 4 388 827 63 25



( 57 )

Table 3.6 Total Enrolment Status at Elementary Level (Class 1 to 8) Year 2016-17SN Level Enrollment

Boys Girls Total1 Primary (Class 1 to 5) 573527 509210 10827372 Upper Primary (Class 6 to 8) 312087 284289 596376Total (Class 1 to 8) 885614 793499 1679113


Table 3.7 GER, NER, Co hart Drop Out and Overall Repetition at Elementary LevelS.N. Indicators Primary Upper Primary1 Gross Enrollment Ratio (GER) 110.03 93.012 Net Enrollment Ratio (NER) 91.97 71.083 Dropout Rate 4.55 2.424 Retention Rate 87.91 98.785 Transition Rate (Primary to Upper Primary) 93.29


Table 3.8 Total Enrolment Status at Secondary Level (Class IX to X) Year 2015-16 &2016-17

SN District Enrolment in ClassesIX-X in 2015-16

Enrolment in ClassesIX-X in 2016-17

Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total1 Almora 14233 14207 28440 13185 13201 263862 Bageshwar 5547 5471 11018 5534 5539 110733 Chamoli 9331 8306 17637 8957 8286 172434 Champawat 5915 5580 11495 5765 5321 110865 Dehradun 34674 30365 65039 34716 30747 654636 Haridwar 28690 24443 53133 28640 25159 537997 Nainital 19139 17676 36815 17671 16821 344928 Pauri 15043 13995 29038 14553 13574 281279 Pithoragarh 11040 9584 20624 10577 9513 2009010 Rudraprayag 5712 5308 11020 5466 5157 1062311 Tehri 13647 13128 26775 13176 12976 2615212 U.S. Nagar 33478 30258 63736 33715 30380 6409513 Uttarkashi 7001 6842 13843 7213 6773 13986Total 203450 185163 388613 199168 183447 382615

State Govt. 91984 106204 198188 85247 100045 185292Source: DISE 2015-16 & U-DISE 2016-17Table No 3.8 indicates that 48.42% students of secondary classes are in governmentschools.

Table 3.9 Total Enrolment Status at Hr. Sr. Secondary Level (Class XI to XII) Year2015-16 & 2016-17

SN District Enrolment in ClassesXI-XII in 2015-16

Enrolment in ClassesXI-XII in 2016-17

Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total1 Almora 11256 11719 22975 11715 11804 235192 Bageshwar 4463 4668 9131 4738 4804 95423 Chamoli 7060 7446 14506 7164 7208 143724 Champawat 4085 4085 8170 4247 4449 86965 Dehradun 28972 26661 55633 30216 27547 577636 Haridwar 20897 17203 38100 20949 17893 388427 Nainital 13720 14250 27970 15083 14484 29567


( 58 )

SN District Enrolment in ClassesXI-XII in 2015-16

Enrolment in ClassesXI-XII in 2016-17

Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total8 Pauri 13350 13372 26722 13416 13149 265659 Pithoragarh 9470 8467 17937 9512 7890 1740210 Rudraprayag 4617 4770 9387 4566 4876 944211 Tehri 10517 11995 22512 10695 11865 2256012 US Nagar 21863 21688 43551 22530 21130 4366013 Uttarkashi 6074 6013 12087 5880 5923 11803STATE 156344 152337 308681 160711 153022 313733

State Govt. 68213 85499 153712 68888 84012 152900Source: DISE 2015-16 & U-DISE 2016-17Table No 3.9 indicates that 48.73% students of higher secondary classes are ingovernment schools.

3.2 Projection of School Age Population (14-17) Age Groups)

Size of the Secondary School-Age PopulationIn Uttarakhand the size of the secondary school (including higher secondary) agepopulation particularly that of 14 to 17 year age, is about 8.99 lakhs consisting of 8.89 percentof the total population i.c 10116000 in the state in 2011 (Census 2011). The projectionsindicate that the size of the 14-17 age group population would increase to 9.13 lakhs in 2013,9.16 lakhs in 2015 and to 8.82 lakhs in 2017. For the secondary school age group (14-15) andhigher secondary school age group (16-17), the population size was 4.62 lakhs and 4.37 lakhsrespectively in 2011. The projected size would be 4.51 and 4.62 lakhs in 2013 and will increaseto 4.53 and decrease to 4.07 lakhs for the respective age groups in 2016.Table 3.10 Projected Population of 14-17 age group in Uttarakhand

Year2011

Year2012

Year2013

Year2014

Year2015

Year2016

Year2017Boys 468550 471131 476719 469161 484373 479548 469551Girls 431260 436413 437076 425880 432262 422767 413298

Total 899810 907544 913795 895041 916635 902315 882849

Table 3.11 DISTRICT-WISE (YEAR-WISE) TOTAL CHILD POPULATION (Age 14 & 15)S.

No.District District wise

ProjectedPopulation of

age 14-15year 2011

District wiseProjected

Population ofage 14-15year 2012








Population ofage 14-15year 20161 Almora B 18953 18149 18618 18825 16923 15977G 19151 18404 18551 18332 16963 15969T 38103 36553 37169 37158 33958 319462 Bageshwar B 6750 6464 6630 6704 6593 6675G 6604 6347 6398 6322 6538 6501T 13354 12810 13028 13027 13155 131763 Chamoli B 10814 10356 10623 10742 11091 10961G 10244 9845 9923 9807 9926 9871T 21058 20200 20547 20548 21008 208324 Champawat B 6322 6054 6210 6280 6902 6884G 5683 5461 5505 5440 6603 6366T 12005 11515 11715 11719 13520 132505 Dehradun B 35466 33963 34839 35228 39701 40492G 31409 30183 30425 30067 34382 35092T 66875 64146 65265 65295 73994 755846 Haridwar B 40202 38498 39492 39932 33298 33707G 35894 34493 34770 34360 28865 29305T 76096 72991 74261 74292 62090 630127 Nainital B 21762 20839 21377 21616 22326 21765G 19607 18842 18993 18769 20633 20219T 41368 39681 40370 40384 42972 419848 Pauri B 19823 18983 19473 19690 17232 17285


( 59 )

S.No.

District District wiseProjected











Population ofage 14-15year 2016G 19349 18594 18743 18522 15942 15854T 39172 37577 38216 38212 33185 331399 Pithoragarh B 12920 12373 12692 12834 13138 13103G 11824 11363 11454 11319 11446 11283T 24745 23736 24146 24153 24558 2438610 Rudraprayag B 6369 6099 6257 6327 6736 6717G 6324 6078 6126 6054 6255 6221T 12694 12177 12383 12381 12996 1293811 TehriGarhwal B 17228 16497 16923 17112 16209 15665G 16488 15845 15972 15784 15638 15552T 33716 32343 32895 32896 31887 3121712 US Nagar B 35791 34274 35159 35551 39534 39526G 32313 31052 31301 30932 35837 35639T 68104 65326 66460 66483 75360 7516513 Uttarkashi B 8084 7742 7941 8030 8330 8608G 7124 6846 6901 6819 8166 8121T 15208 14587 14842 14849 16524 16729

TOTAL STATEB 240484 230291 236235 238870 238014 237365G 222014 213352 215062 212528 217193 215993T 462498 443643 451297 451398 455207 453358

Source : RGI & NUEPANote : Projection are as on 1st March 2010 on Annual Growth RateIn 2011 the population of 14-15 age group children is 0.76 lakhs in district Haridwar,which is highest between all the 13 districts and 0.12 lakhs in district Champawat which islowest between all the 13 districts of Uttarakhand.

Table 3.12 DISTRICT-WISE (YEAR-WISE) TOTAL CHILD POPULATION (Age 16 & 17)S.

No.District Projected

Populationof age 16-17

year 2011

ProjectedPopulation

of age 16-17year 2012

ProjectedPopulation


ProjectedPopulation


ProjectedPopulation



age 16-17year 20161 Almora B 17974 18981 18953 18149 15362 15154G 18049 19241 19151 18404 15381 15148T 36023 38222 38103 36553 30810 303692 Bageshwar B 6401 6760 6750 6464 5985 5904G 6225 6636 6604 6347 5928 5838T 12626 13395 13354 12810 11936 117653 Chamoli B 10256 10830 10814 10356 10068 9932G 9655 10293 10244 9845 9000 8864T 19911 21123 21058 20200 19060 187874 Champawat B 5996 6331 6322 6054 6266 6181G 5356 5709 5683 5461 5987 5896T 11351 12041 12005 11515 12266 120915 Dehradun B 33635 35519 35466 33963 36039 35550G 29603 31557 31409 30183 31176 30703T 63237 67076 66875 64146 67134 661726 Haridwar B 38126 40261 40202 38498 30227 29817G 33830 36063 35894 34493 26174 25777T 71956 76325 76096 72991 56334 555277 Nainital B 20638 21794 21762 20839 20267 19992G 18479 19699 19607 18842 18710 18426T 39117 41493 41368 39681 38988 384298 Pauri B 18800 19853 19823 18983 15643 15431G 18236 19440 19349 18594 14456 14236T 37036 39293 39172 37577 30108 296779 Pithoragarh B 12253 12940 12920 12373 11927 11765G 11144 11880 11824 11363 10379 10221T 23398 24820 24745 23736 22282 2196210 Rudraprayag B 6041 6379 6369 6099 6115 6032G 5961 6354 6324 6078 5672 5586T 12001 12733 12694 12177 11791 1162211 TehriGarhwal B 16338 17253 17228 16497 14714 14514G 15540 16566 16488 15845 14180 13965T 31878 33819 33716 32343 28931 2851712 US Nagar B 33943 35844 35791 34274 35888 35401G 30455 32465 32313 31052 32496 32003T 64397 68309 68104 65326 68373 67393


( 60 )

S.No.

District ProjectedPopulation


ProjectedPopulation


ProjectedPopulation


ProjectedPopulation


ProjectedPopulation



age 16-17year 201613 Uttarkashi B 7667 8096 8084 7742 7562 7460G 6714 7157 7124 6846 7405 7293T 14381 15254 15208 14587 14992 14777

TOTAL STATEB 228066 240840 240484 230291 216061 213132G 209246 223061 222014 213352 196944 193956T 437312 463901 462498 443643 413005 407088

Source : RGI & NUEPAIn 2011 the population of 16-17 age group children is 0.71 lakhs in district Haridwarwhich is highest between all the 13 districts and 0.11 lakhs in district Champawat which islowest between all the 13 districts of Uttarakhand. The proposition of girls population is47.84% in 2011, 47.64% in 2016 which indicate that the share of girls population is slightlydeclining year by year in UttarakhandPopulation of Social GroupsThe total population of Uttarakhand, according to Census 2011 is 101.16 lakhs, out ofwhich 4.32% children are from 14-15 age group. The percentage of the children of social group(SC/ST) is 24.36% out of the total population of children belonging the age group of 14-15.

Table 3.13 District-wise Social Group wise 14-15 age group populationS.

No. District DecadalG.Rate

Total Population Population 14 & 15 Age Group (Cast Wise) 2011SC ST

Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total1 Almora 3.14 290414 331513 621927 4112 4122 8234 32 30 632 Bageshwar 17.56 124121 135719 259840 2060 1921 3982 48 58 1063 Chamoli 13.51 193572 197542 391114 2205 2057 4262 293 278 5714 Champawat 9.21 130881 128434 259315 1024 946 1969 19 15 335 Dehradun 24.71 893222 805338 1698560 5966 5301 11267 3268 3132 64006 Haridwar 26.3 1025428 901601 1927029 10546 9475 20021 105 71 1767 Nainital 32.88 494115 461013 955128 5486 5271 10757 187 165 3528 Pauri 3.87 326406 360121 686527 2955 2949 5903 32 34 669 Pithoragarh 10.92 240427 245566 485993 3185 2807 5992 509 486 99610 Rudraprayag 13.44 111747 125110 236857 1236 1154 2390 1 1 211 Tehri 16.15 296604 319805 616409 2721 2641 5362 10 7 1712 US Nagar 27.79 858906 789461 1648367 5783 5288 11071 4328 4168 849713 Uttarkashi 22.72 168335 161351 329686 2121 1899 4020 92 76 168STATE 5154178 4962574 10116752 49399 45830 95229 8924 8522 17447

Source : Census 2011The preposition of SC community children among the State is 18.24% and ST children is3.15% out of the total population of 14 to 15 age group children.Table 3.14 Age Group 16-17 child population

S.No. District Decadal

G.RateTotal Population Population 14 & 15 Age Group (Cast Wise) 2011

SC STMale Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total1 Almora 3.14 290414 331513 621927 3021 3205 6226 23 17 392 Bageshwar 17.56 124121 135719 259840 1526 1439 2965 35 54 883 Chamoli 13.51 193572 197542 391114 1816 1730 3546 294 312 6064 Champawat 9.21 130881 128434 259315 765 662 1427 15 14 305 Dehradun 24.71 893222 805338 1698560 5091 4667 9757 2539 2446 49856 Haridwar 26.3 1025428 901601 1927029 8318 7148 15466 78 60 1377 Nainital 32.88 494115 461013 955128 4563 3871 8434 177 178 3558 Pauri 3.87 326406 360121 686527 2608 2427 5035 25 20 459 Pithoragarh 10.92 240427 245566 485993 2622 2149 4771 438 465 90310 Rudraprayag 13.44 111747 125110 236857 1064 983 2047 3 2 611 Tehri 16.15 296604 319805 616409 2046 1999 4045 13 12 2512 US Nagar 27.79 858906 789461 1648367 4673 3661 8334 3337 3565 690213 Uttarkashi 22.72 168335 161351 329686 1703 1520 3222 99 78 177

STATE 5154178 4962574 10116752 39815 35461 75276 7075 7221 14296Source : Census 2011The proposition of SC community children among the State is 20.59% and propositionof ST children is 3.77% out of the total population of 16 to 17 age group children.


( 61 )

3.3 Current Status of Secondary Education

Participation and Enrolments in UttarakhandThe participation of concerned age group (14/15 and 16/17) children in the secondaryand higher secondary education is indicated by their enrolment and attendance. The tablegiven below presents the rate of enrolment in the secondary and higher secondary classes ofboys and girls in Uttarakhand. Herein, it is to be noted that the enrolment figures includes bothover-aged and under-aged to the concerned age groups.Table 3.15 Year wise enrolment in secondary and higher secondary level

Class 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalIX 103481 94109 197590 101104 90991 192095 100805 90886 191691X 104068 96701 200769 102346 94172 196518 98363 92561 190924

Total 207549 190810 398359 203450 185163 388613 199168 183447 382615XI 76778 74021 150799 78127 75976 154103 81407 75286 156693XII 83566 78534 162100 78217 76361 154578 79304 77736 157040Total 160344 152555 312899 156344 152337 308681 160711 153022 313733

Source: SEMIS, 2014-15, Dise 2015-16 & U-Dise 2016-17This reveals that the total enrolment at secondary level was 388613 in 2015-16 and382615 in 2016-17. The total enrolment at higher secondary level was 308681 in 2015-16 and313733 in 2016-17.Table 3.16 Enrolment by Class, Gender and Social Category

Category

Class IX Class X Class XI Class XIIBoys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13As on 30th Sept 2016-17General 52699 46015 98714 52223 46582 98805 48072 42001 90073 45805 43167 88972SC 23299 21790 45089 22198 22325 44523 16065 15725 31790 15648 16295 31943ST 3080 2865 5945 3075 3150 6225 2450 2701 5151 2507 2818 5325OBC 21727 20216 41943 20867 20504 41371 14820 14859 29679 15344 15456 30800

Total 100805 90886 191691 98363 92561 190924 81407 75286 156693 79304 77736 157040Source: U-Dise 2016-17The enrolment of SC children in 2016-17 is 23.42%, ST children 3.18% and OBC is21.77% in the secondary level. While at higher secondary level the participation is 20.31 of SC,3.34% of ST and 19.27% of OBC in year 2016-17.

Table 3.17 Age Specific enrolment in secondaryAge Class 9 Class 10 Total

Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total14 35569 31185 66754 31365 27737 59102 66934 58922 12585615 17394 15958 33352 35691 33087 68778 53085 49045 102130

Total 52963 47143 100106 67056 60824 127880 120019 107967 227986Source : U-DISE 2016-17The share of 14 and 15 year age children in total enrolment at secondary i.c. 382615level is 59.58%. The share of girls enrolment in total 14 and 15 age group children out of thetotal girls enrolment is 47.35%.

Table 3.18 Age Specific enrolment in higher secondary levelAge Class 11 Class 12 Total

Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total16 28235 25548 53783 25151 24355 49506 53386 49903 10329817 12982 12228 25210 24833 24431 49264 37815 36659 74474

Total 41217 37776 78993 49984 48786 98770 91201 86562 177772Source : U-DISE 2016-17The share of 16 and 17 year age children in total enrolment at higher secondary i.c.313733 level is 56.66%. The share of girls enrolment in total 16 and 17 age group children outof the total girls enrolment is 48.69%.


( 62 )

Gross and Net Enrolment Ratio (GER and NER) of Secondary Classes in Uttarakhand foryear 2016-17This table 3.19 shows that the Gross enrolment ratio (GER) of secondary classes is thepercentage of students enrolled (all ages) in the secondary classes to the secondary school agepopulation (14/15 years age) in a year. According to DISE data, there are about 3.82 lakhschildren enrolled during 2016-17 for the secondary (IX and X) classes in Uttarakhand. Bygender break-up, there are 199168 and 183447 respectively of male and female childrenenrolled for the secondary classes in the state during 2016-17. The projections for thesecondary school age population are as on 1st March. Taking the projections of secondaryschool age population for years 2016-17is 453358.The gross enrolment ratio (GER) of secondary schooling in the state is about 84.40percent during 2016-17. The gender-wise gross enrolment ratio (GER) of secondary school agemale and female children is 83.91% and 84.93% respectively in the state.

Table 3.19 District wise GERS.

No.District GER

All community SC STB G T B G T B G T1 ALMORA 82.52 82.67 82.60 95.46 97.26 96.35 108.70 70.27 91.572 BAGESHWAR 82.91 85.20 84.04 95.30 106.60 100.74 50.00 39.39 44.073 CHAMOLI 81.72 83.94 82.77 93.08 101.09 96.76 86.36 89.73 87.894 CHAMPAWAT 83.74 83.58 83.67 92.04 95.14 93.52 128.00 50.00 85.455 DEHRADUN 85.74 87.62 86.61 93.52 101.57 97.51 82.58 89.82 86.126 HARIDWAR 84.97 85.85 85.38 93.36 96.91 95.03 93.78 106.90 99.747 NAINITAL 81.19 83.19 82.16 89.68 96.79 93.05 69.92 52.84 59.898 PAURI 84.19 85.62 84.88 105.75 113.13 109.30 106.59 148.98 121.439 PITHORAGARH 80.72 84.31 82.38 92.51 99.97 96.08 68.41 91.90 79.2010 RUDRAPRAYAG 81.38 82.90 82.11 80.18 89.54 84.51 333.33 500.00 428.5711 TEHRI 84.11 83.44 83.77 98.37 100.97 99.66 85.71 35.00 55.8812 U.S. NAGAR 85.30 85.24 85.27 97.74 92.91 95.37 82.97 82.80 82.8913 UTTARKASHI 83.79 83.40 83.60 99.90 95.97 97.98 100.00 68.97 85.71

TOTAL 83.91 84.93 84.40 101.22 103.18 96.65 82.78 85.42 84.06Source : U-DISE 2016-17The above table shows that the GER at secondary level increased year by year 70.25%to 84.40% from year 2009-10 to 2016-17 respectively. The GER at higher secondary levelincreased 65.44% to 77.06% from year 2009-10 to 2016-17.

Table 3.20 District wise Adjust NERS.

No.District All Category

Boys Girls Total1 ALMORA 64.91 62.21 63.562 BAGESHWAR 69.29 67.88 68.593 CHAMOLI 62.83 65.29 64.004 CHAMPAWAT 57.90 56.96 57.455 DEHRADUN 75.36 76.50 75.896 HARIDWAR 58.81 58.31 58.587 NAINITAL 71.35 73.89 72.578 PAURI 70.01 68.41 69.249 PITHORAGARH 70.83 72.67 71.6810 RUDRAPRAYAG 68.05 69.02 68.5211 TEHRI 64.88 63.16 64.0212 U.S. NAGAR 67.63 65.50 66.6213 UTTARKASHI 60.42 61.88 61.13TOTAL 67.32 67.05 67.19

Source : U-DISE 2016-17Note : NER shows the coverage of pupils in the official secondary school age group onlywhile ANER extends the measure to include pupils that are of the official secondary agegroup who are in secondary level and in higher secondary level.


( 63 )

The net enrolment ratio at secondary level was 39.00% in year 2009-10 and itincreased and become 67.19% in year 2016-17 at secondary level in Uttarakhand.Repetition and Dropout ratesThe repetition and dropout rates are indicators of grade-to-grade flow rates of theeducational system. They indicate the stagnation and wastage in the system where theminimization of which increases the efficiency. Repetition rate is the percentage of repeaters inthe current school year in grade to the previous school year’s total enrolment in the samegrade. The enrollment at secondary and higher secondary level (Class 9-12) is satisfactory inthe State in comparison of overall enrolment at country level but the repetition at secondaryand higher secondary level is much more higher. The following table shows the repeaters anddropout in secondary and higher secondary level in Uttarakhand.Promotion and Repetition Rate at Secondary Level

Table 3.21 District wise Promotion & Repetition Rate

District Promotion Rate Repetition RateBoys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalAlmora 77.36 81.45 79.40 11.46 10.04 10.75Bageshwar 86.79 85.63 86.21 9.77 8.39 9.09Chamoli 82.56 90.38 86.24 10.89 6.06 8.61Champawat 76.40 84.28 80.23 6.41 5.30 5.87Dehradun 81.50 84.60 82.95 4.01 3.63 3.84Haridwar 71.51 77.94 74.47 4.34 4.93 4.61Nainital 80.05 83.58 81.74 5.60 4.21 4.93Pauri 83.02 85.43 84.18 7.37 4.92 6.19Pithoragarh 81.03 80.55 80.81 6.11 5.79 5.96Rudraprayag 72.25 77.66 74.85 9.14 7.69 8.44Tehri 83.10 87.07 85.05 8.75 7.54 8.16US Nagar 80.12 83.99 81.96 6.97 6.55 6.77Uttarkashi 80.67 82.04 81.35 8.80 7.69 8.25

Total 79.39 83.30 81.25 6.75 5.88 6.33Source: U-DISE 2016-17The above table shows that the promotion rate at secondary level is 81.25 while therepetition rate at secondary level 6.33%.

Drop Out Rate and Retention Rate at Secondary Level

Table 3.22 Dropout & Retention Rate

District Drop Out Rate Retention RateBoys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalAlmora 11.18 8.51 9.85 88.82 91.49 90.15Bageshwar 3.44 5.98 4.70 96.56 94.02 95.30Chamoli 6.55 3.56 5.14 93.45 96.44 94.86Champawat 17.19 10.41 13.90 82.81 89.59 86.10Dehradun 14.48 11.77 13.21 85.52 88.23 86.79Haridwar 24.16 17.13 20.93 75.84 82.87 79.07Nainital 14.35 12.21 13.33 85.65 87.79 86.67Pauri 9.61 9.65 9.63 90.39 90.35 90.37Pithoragarh 12.85 13.66 13.23 87.15 86.34 86.77Rudraprayag 18.61 14.66 16.71 81.39 85.34 83.29Tehri 8.15 5.39 6.80 91.85 94.61 93.20US Nagar 12.91 9.46 11.27 87.09 90.54 88.73


( 64 )

District Drop Out Rate Retention RateBoys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalUttarkashi 10.53 10.27 10.40 89.47 89.73 89.60

Total 13.86 10.82 12.42 86.14 89.18 87.58Source: U-DISE 2016-17The above table reveals that in year 2016-17 the drop rate is 12.42 percent and theretention rate 87.58 percent at secondary level.

Transition rates (Class VIII/IX)The transition rate indicates a grade to grade flow or passing through of students withina level or one level to another level over the school years. The promotion rate, repetition anddrop-out rate presented above are grade-to-grade transition rates. Also elsewhere in the aboveanalysis we have mentioned about the crude form of transition rate from elementary to thesecondary level and the secondary to the higher secondary level i.e. ratio of enrolment in classVIII to class IX and class X to class XI. Herein we have a more refined version of transition ratewhile discounting the repeaters. The transition rate from elementary to the secondary is a ratioof the new entrance in class IX (after excluding the repeaters in the class IX) in the year ofreference (say 2016) to the enrolment in class VIII in the previous year of the reference year(i.e. 2015).Table 3.23 District wise Transition Rate

District Transition Rate Class VIII to Class IXBoys Girls TotalAlmora 98.54 97.10 97.82Bageshwar 101.51 100.58 101.03Chamoli 101.24 100.32 100.78Champawat 98.33 93.33 95.87Dehradun 99.99 98.49 99.29Haridwar 80.13 74.82 77.61Nainital 93.91 95.21 94.54Pauri 97.69 99.32 98.48Pithoragarh 104.23 101.39 102.88Rudraprayag 95.36 96.22 95.78Tehri 91.50 94.29 92.88US Nagar 91.51 92.27 91.87Uttarkashi 95.06 93.63 94.37

Uttarakhand 93.68 92.70 93.21Source: U-DISE 2016-17According to U-DISE source, the enrolment in class VIII during 2015-16 was 1.95 lakhsin Uttarakhand and from the U-DISE data we have the total enrolment with repeater in class IXas 0.09 lakhs respectively during 2016-17. With these numbers the new entrants in class IX isderived as 1.81 lakhs after excluding the repeaters. Then the transition rate for the referenceyear 2016-17 from elementary to secondary level is 93.21%.

Enrolment of Children with special needs in the Secondary SchoolsWhen examined participation of disabled children in the educational developmentprocess especially in the secondary and higher secondary school education, there are about1307 children with special needs enrolled for the secondary and higher secondary classes inUttarakhand during 2016-17.Table 3.24 Status of Enrolment of Disabled Children

S.No. District Boys Girls Total1 ALMORA 51 30 812 BAGESHWAR 42 43 85


( 65 )

S.No. District Boys Girls Total3 CHAMOLI 40 36 764 CHAMPAWAT 43 54 975 DEHRADUN 75 120 1956 HARIDWAR 51 29 807 NAINITAL 41 40 818 PAURI 79 58 1379 PITHORAGARH 64 31 9510 RUDRAPRAYAG 36 39 7511 TEHRI 50 35 8512 U.S. NAGAR 76 68 14413 UTTARKASHI 47 29 76TOTAL 695 612 1307

Source: U-DISE 2016-17The gender distribution of the physically challenged children enrolled for the secondaryand higher secondary classes indicate that the female children account about 46.82% of thetotal of children with special needs for secondary level.ICT @ Schools-

Table 3.25 ICT Summary

S.No.

Type of School

Nature and number ofschool

Schools covered underICT

Balance

Govt.Govt.aided

Total Govt.Govt.aided

Total Govt.Govt.aided

Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 111 Secondary school 962 66 1028 17 0 17 945 66 10112 H.S. school 1298 324 1622 608 0 608 690 324 1014Total 2260 390 2650 625 0 625 1635 390 2025

Source: U-DISE 2016-173.3.1 Physical Access and Facilities

(i) Profile of Secondary Level Institutions.Table 3.26 Number of Schools having classes IX-X by Management/Funding wise

(Refer Table 3.5)Sl.No.


Dept. ofEducation

Tribal/Social

WelfareDept.

LocalBody

Pvt.Aided

Un-Aided

Schools

CentralGovt.

Madarsa

1 ALMORA 339 261 0 1 40 34 3 02 BAGESHWAR 122 90 0 0 16 13 3 03 CHAMOLI 256 200 1 0 22 28 5 04 CHAMPAWAT 141 105 0 0 9 23 4 05 DEHRADUN 474 165 5 2 55 225 21 16 HARDWAR 257 89 0 0 56 106 4 27 NAINITAL 308 188 1 0 34 80 5 08 GARHWAL 429 303 0 1 75 46 4 09 PITHORAGARH 267 209 3 0 9 42 4 010 RUDRAPRAYAG 148 109 0 0 28 9 2 011 TEHRI 336 287 0 0 14 32 3 012 U.S. NAGAR 341 123 5 0 27 162 2 2213 UTTARKASHI 158 125 0 0 3 27 3 0Total 3576 2254 15 4 388 827 63 25

Source: U-DISE 2016-17This table show that 63.03% school are managed by state government. Only 23.12%schools are managed by private unaided bodies.Table 3.27 Schooling Structure (Total schools) (Refer Table 3.4)


( 66 )

Sl.No.


withClass I

to X

No. ofSchools

withClass Ito XII

No. ofSchools

withClass

V/VI toX

No. ofSchools

withClass VI

to XII

No. ofSchools

withClass

VIII/IXto X

No. ofSchools

withClass

VIII/IXto XII

No. ofSchools

withClass XI

to XII

TotalSchool



Table 3.28 Schools by Category (Refer Table 3.3)S.

No.District Secondary

SchoolHr. Sec.School

Intermediate/ JuniorCollege

DegreeCollege with

+2 level

Post-Graduate

college with+2 and +3

levels

Others

1 ALMORA 118 221 0 0 0 02 BAGESHWAR 43 79 0 0 0 03 CHAMOLI 112 145 0 0 0 04 CHAMPAWAT 60 81 0 0 0 05 DEHRADUN 147 328 0 0 0 06 HARIDWAR 101 162 0 0 0 07 NAINITAL 100 209 0 0 0 08 PAURI 150 279 0 0 0 09 PITHORAGARH 111 156 0 0 0 010 RUDRAPRAYAG 47 101 0 0 0 011 TEHRI 123 214 0 0 0 012 U.S. NAGAR 149 200 0 0 0 013 UTTARKASHI 67 91 0 0 0 0TOTAL 1328 2266 0 0 0 0


(ii) Access to Secondary Schooling Facilities

Table 3.29 Infrastructure Gap in Govt. Secondary SchoolS.

No.District Total Govt.

SecondarySchool

WithoutClassRoom

WithoutToilet

WithoutDrinking

Water

WithoutElectricity

WithoutPlay

Ground

WithoutLibrary

WithoutComputer

Room

WithoutScience

Lab

WithoutArt &Craft1 ALMORA 261 1 2 13 8 67 68 47 43 732 BAGESHWAR 90 0 0 10 11 77 74 54 44 803 CHAMOLI 200 0 0 15 16 25 74 48 40 884 CHAMPAWAT 105 8 0 26 8 48 80 58 55 865 DEHRADUN 165 29 2 8 9 60 50 38 33 617 HARIDWAR 89 27 7 20 26 56 56 48 49 648 NAINITAL 188 2 0 10 4 40 64 43 49 696 PAURI 303 3 0 18 6 57 77 49 43 869 PITHORAGARH 209 3 0 21 13 58 75 50 59 8310 RUDRAPRAYAG 109 10 0 15 5 51 89 65 56 9411 TEHRI 287 22 1 22 18 61 76 46 37 8512 U.S. NAGAR 123 4 0 1 2 45 66 50 50 72


( 67 )

S.No.

District Total Govt.Secondary

School

WithoutClassRoom

WithoutToilet

WithoutDrinking

Water

WithoutElectricity

WithoutPlay

Ground

WithoutLibrary

WithoutComputer

Room

WithoutScience

Lab

WithoutArt &Craft13 UTTARKASHI 125 52 8 34 30 64 78 52 53 91

TOTAL in % 2254 11 1 16 11 55 71 49 46 80This table show that out of the total school managed by state government 11% schoolsare without classroom, 1% are without any toilet, 16% are without drinking water, 11% arewithout electricity, 55% are without Play ground, 71% are without library, 49% are withoutcomputer room, 46% are without integrated science lab and 80% schools are without activityrooms.Planning for universalization of Physical AccessThe school mapping in Uttarakhand was done by household survey for upgrading theupper primary schools. In RMSA norms GIS mapping is proposed, Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke LiyeMadhyamik Shiksha Parisad has signed MOU with USAC and the school GIS mapping exercise iscompleted.Schooling facility as per populationThe first strategy to achieve the goal of universalization of secondary education isuniversalization of access to school with child population. The data shows that 13 secondarylevel schools serve per lakh population while only 10 government secondary schools servedper lakh population. At higher secondary level only 22 schools are available for per lakhpopulation but only 13 government higher secondary school available for per lakh population.

Table 3.30 No. of School per lakh population (Refer Table 3.3)SN Name of the

DistrictTotal No. of Schools Total

Population In 2011

No. of School Per LakhPopulation

Ave. Population( In Thousand) Served

By Per SchoolSecond

ary( ClassIX & X)

Hr.Secondary( Class XI

& XII)

Secondary

( Class IX& X)

Hr.Secondary( Class XI

& XII)

Secondary

( Class IX& X)

Hr.Secondar

y( Class XI

& XII)1 Almora 118 221 621927 19 36 5 32 Bageshwar 43 79 259840 17 30 6 33 Chamoli 112 145 391114 29 37 3 34 Champawat 60 81 259315 23 31 4 35 Dehra Dun 147 328 1698560 9 19 12 56 Haridwar 101 162 1927029 5 8 19 127 Nainital 100 209 955128 10 22 10 58 Pauri 150 279 686527 22 41 5 29 Pithoragarh 111 156 485993 23 32 4 310 Rudraprayag 47 101 236857 20 43 5 211 Tehri 123 214 616409 20 35 5 312 US Nagar 149 200 1648367 9 12 11 813 Uttarkashi 67 91 329686 20 28 5 4Total 1328 2266 10116752 13 22 8 4

Only Govt. School 962 1298 10116752 10 13 11 8Source: U-Dise 2016-17In district Chamoli the highest number of secondary i.c. is 29 schools and in districtRudrapryag highest number of higher secondary i.c. 43 school available for per lakh populationwhile in district Haridwar the lowest number of school i.c. 5 and 8 secondary and highersecondary school available for per lakh population. This analysis shows that in urban areasthere is need of more schools as per population norms.

School Mapping Exercise The main objective of Rastriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan scheme is to providesecondary education facility for all within 5 Km distance.


( 68 )

To observe that how many habitations are served by secondary education facility it wasdecided that a school mapping exercise will be conducted manually. To constitute different committees at district, block and cluster level a detailedguideline send to all the district functionaries. Cluster has been selected as anadministrative unit for school mapping exercise. Different formats (1-5) prepared forgathering of information and practice related to school mapping.Training program has been prepared for school mapping exercise at state, district andblock levels. At all levels of school mapping committees, educationist and representatives of PRIsnominated as members. To identified unserved habitations, distance and grade matrix has been prepared on thebasis of gathered information in the format no.4 . On the basis of school mapping served and unserved habitations has been listed.Particulars of served and unserved habitations are as follows-

Table 3.31 District wise served and unserved habitation in UttarakhandSN District No. of

HabitationsServed habitation in

Secondary schoolfacility Withinradius of 5 km

Served habitation inSecondary school

facility above radiusof 5 km

GAR

1 Almora 3618 3379 239 93.392 Bageshwar 962 859 103 89.293 Chamoli 2051 1808 243 88.154 Champawat 1246 1078 168 86.525 Dehradun 1634 1459 175 89.296 Haridwar 823 783 40 95.147 Nainital 1983 1682 301 84.828 Pauri 3640 3546 94 97.429 Pithoragarh 3170 3009 161 94.9210 Rudraprayag 985 942 43 95.6311 Tehri 2557 2240 317 87.6012 U.S. Nagar 1214 1157 57 95.3013 Uttarkashi 1167 1008 159 86.38Total 25050 22950 2100 91.62

Source: School Mapping 2010-11This table shows that out of total 25050 habitations 22950 habitations are covered withsecondary education facility within radios of 5 km. and rest 2100 habitations are withoutsecondary school facilities with in the 5 km radius. Uttarakhand Sabhi Ke Liye MadhymikShiksha Parishad (USKLMSP) decided to conduct HHS and GIS mapping exercise forupgradation of UPS and opening for new school in the state. The MOU for this mapping hasbeen signed with Uttarakhand Satellite Application Centre (USAC).Classroom / Pupil RatioGiven the number of schools with the secondary and higher secondary classes, theadequacy/sufficiency in terms of number of class rooms available in these schools is matter ofconcern. An analysis of current status is useful for the future planning to improve thesecondary and higher secondary while expanding number of classrooms available.

S.No. District SCR1 ALMORA 21:12 BAGESHWAR 24:13 CHAMOLI 19:14 CHAMPAWAT 25:15 DEHRADUN 35:16 HARIDWAR 39:1


( 69 )

S.No. District SCR7 NAINITAL 28:18 PAURI 16:19 PITHORAGARH 20:110 RUDRAPRAYAG 27:111 TEHRI 26:112 U.S. NAGAR 46:113 UTTARKASHI 53:1Total 26:1

Source: U-DISE 2016-17In Uttarakhand, the total number of classrooms available for the teaching activity forsecondary classes was 7948 during 2009-10. In terms of classroom availability for the enrolledchildren for the year 2016-17 is 26 children per classroom. In 2016-17 total classroomavailable for teaching learning process is 7107 for 184231 students i.c. one classroom isavailable for 26 students.Teachers in Secondary grade Teaching Schools in UttarakhandTeachers play important role in education system wherein they are front-runners ofservice delivery. Adequacy in terms of number of teachers available and the commitmentinfluences the learning process in the schools.Number of TeachersAccording to data shown in table 3.32 indicates that there are about 15209 full-timeregular teachers in government schools in Uttarakhand for the year 2016-17. The total numberof teachers available for secondary classes in the state is 21116

Table 3.32 Teachers Position in Secondary School, 2016-17

Particulars Govt. Others TotalM F Total M F Total M F TotalNo. of WorkingTeachers 10563 4646 15209 3190 2717 5907 13753 7363 21116% of Female Teacher 30.55 46.00 34.87

Source: U-Dise 2016-17It can also be seen that 30.55% female teachers are working in government secondaryschools. In total 34.87% of female teachers are working in secondary school.Pupil Teacher Ratio:According to the U-DISE data, the pupil teacher ratio (PTR) is 18:1 as a whole. The pupilteacher ratio seems to be high i.e. 30:1 in aided school as compared to government and otherschools i.e. 12:1 and 35: 1.

Table 3.33 PTRSN Type of School Total

EnrolmentNo. of Working

Teacher PTR1 Govt. School 184231 15209 12:12 Aided School 54431 1813 30:13 Other School 143953 4094 35:1Total School 382615 21116 18:1

Learning Outcomes of Secondary School Education in UttarakhandIn a systematic approach the inputs and outputs have always been a matter of concern.In the education system given the inputs in terms of educational infrastructure, the output interms of learning outcomes is evaluated.


( 70 )

Enrolled, Appeared and Passed in Class X Exam:When we examine the learning outcomes of secondary education in Uttarakhand interms of children graduating from the final grade of secondary schooling i.e. Class X, it isobserved from the Uttarakhand, Board of Secondary (Board Exam conducting body) sourcethat there are about 1.77 lakhs children appeared in class X board exam in the state during2015-16 and 1.39 lakhs (78.68%) children were passed out.Table 3.34 Secondary School Board (Class X) Examination by district wise & by Social

Group in Govt. Schools

DISTRICT CASTENumber of Students Appeared inThe Class X Board Examination

Number of Students Passed inThe Class X Board

ExaminationBoys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalALMORA Gen 4955 5079 10034 3973 4075 8048ALMORA SC 1973 2146 4119 1284 1407 2691ALMORA ST 24 28 52 29 24 53ALMORA OBC 230 217 447 165 184 349

Total 7182 7470 14652 5451 5690 11141BAGESHWAR Gen 1733 1721 3454 1470 1462 2932BAGESHWAR SC 979 904 1883 714 616 1330BAGESHWAR ST 7 9 16 7 8 15BAGESHWAR OBC 137 143 280 117 119 236Total 2856 2777 5633 2308 2205 4513CHAMOLI Gen 3460 3056 6516 2709 2596 5305CHAMOLI SC 1436 1136 2572 856 815 1671CHAMOLI ST 96 60 156 68 56 124CHAMOLI OBC 81 95 176 64 74 138Total 5073 4347 9420 3697 3541 7238CHAMPAWAT Gen 1846 1883 3729 1456 1651 3107CHAMPAWAT SC 576 694 1270 345 438 783CHAMPAWAT ST 6 13 19 4 10 14CHAMPAWAT OBC 166 159 325 99 125 224Total 2594 2749 5343 1904 2224 4128DEHRADUN Gen 9031 7264 16295 8194 6766 14960DEHRADUN SC 1937 1972 3909 1404 1538 2942DEHRADUN ST 1147 1316 2463 940 1077 2017DEHRADUN OBC 2067 1893 3960 1646 1632 3278Total 14182 12445 26627 12184 11013 23197HARDWAR Gen 2920 1937 4857 2015 1688 3703HARDWAR SC 3213 3217 6430 1942 2014 3956HARDWAR ST 74 207 281 47 156 203HARDWAR OBC 4616 4093 8709 3186 3090 6276Total 10823 9454 20277 7190 6948 14138NAINITAL Gen 6028 4967 10995 5358 4490 9848NAINITAL SC 2170 2123 4293 1658 1718 3376NAINITAL ST 105 107 212 83 80 163NAINITAL OBC 718 950 1668 603 778 1381Total 9021 8147 17168 7702 7066 14768PAURI Gen 5199 4719 9918 4417 4126 8543PAURI SC 1653 1503 3156 1117 1116 2233PAURI ST 57 19 76 17 6 23PAURI OBC 187 185 372 143 140 283Total 7096 6426 13522 5694 5388 11082PITHORAGARH Gen 2915 2311 5226 2669 1972 4641PITHORAGARH SC 1542 1250 2792 993 875 1868PITHORAGARH ST 152 85 237 122 81 203


( 71 )

DISTRICT CASTENumber of Students Appeared inThe Class X Board Examination

Number of Students Passed inThe Class X Board

ExaminationBoys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalPITHORAGARH OBC 443 429 872 362 342 704

Total 5052 4075 9127 4146 3270 7416RUDRAPRAYAG Gen 1433 1412 2845 1196 1288 2484RUDRAPRAYAG SC 520 461 981 377 349 726RUDRAPRAYAG ST 1 0 1 1 0 1RUDRAPRAYAG OBC 38 25 63 36 25 61Total 1992 1898 3890 1610 1662 3272TEHRI GARHWAL Gen 5019 5293 10312 3920 3892 7812TEHRI GARHWAL SC 1457 1488 2945 943 945 1888TEHRI GARHWAL ST 15 4 19 27 4 31TEHRI GARHWAL OBC 679 756 1435 434 582 1016Total 7170 7541 14711 5324 5423 10747UDHAM SINGH NAGAR Gen 5308 4653 9961 4448 3903 8351UDHAM SINGH NAGAR SC 3353 3413 6766 2307 2423 4730UDHAM SINGH NAGAR ST 1281 1385 2666 913 1022 1935UDHAM SINGH NAGAR OBC 5590 5404 10994 3961 4240 8201Total 15532 14855 30387 11629 11588 23217UTTARKASHI Gen 304 311 615 256 265 521UTTARKASHI SC 956 904 1860 552 600 1152UTTARKASHI ST 57 56 113 40 48 88UTTARKASHI OBC 2117 2134 4251 1574 1554 3128Total 3434 3405 6839 2422 2467 4889

UTTARAKHAND Gen 50151 44606 94757 42081 38174 80255UTTARAKHAND SC 21765 21211 42976 14492 14854 29346UTTARAKHAND ST 3022 3289 6311 2298 2572 4870UTTARAKHAND OBC 17069 16483 33552 12390 12885 25275UTTARAKHAND Total 92007 85589 177596 71261 68485 139746

Source: DISE 2016-17The U-DISE data shows that 66.58.% boys and 70.02% girls passed in SC category,where as in ST category 76.04% boys and 78.20% girls passed, in the OBC category 72.58%boys and 78.17% girls passed in class X exam. This table shows that the girl passing percent iscomparatively high in all categories.Incentives for Teachers: teacher award, housing, and quotas for womenIn Uttarakhand, there are many schemes designed in the form of incentives for teachers.State Government started Sailesh Matyani award from year 2009-10 and Pandit DeendayalUpadhaya Award for good performing teachers. The State Government also awarded teachersthrough State teacher award in every year. There is no housing facility for the teachers. Thegovernment of Uttarakhand has designed a policy for the recruitment of teachers where 50%of the total teacher posts are reserved for women. However, the male and female ratio in thetotal teachers available for the secondary classes indicates it is against the female teachers.Public Expenditure on Secondary Education in UttarakhandAllocation of adequate financial resources to education is a crucial factor in theeducational development of a country/state/region. This section, therefore, examines the levelof financial resources allocated to the primary, secondary and higher secondary education inUttarakhand.


( 72 )

Expenditure on School Education

TrendsThe table 3.35 indicates the budget expenditure in Uttarakhand. It reflects that theexpenditure on total education has increased from Rs. 2900.46 crores in 2010-11 toRs. 3957.28 in the last budget allocation during 2014-15. The expenditure on secondary schooleducation has increased from Rs. 1396.45 crores to Rs. 2136.05 crores during the same period.The rate of increase (i.e. annual average growth) in the expenditure on the secondaryeducation during the period in the state is almost at the same rate by which GSDP and the totalexpenditure has grown. Moreover, the rate of increase in the expenditure on total education issame as elementary and secondary education.Table 3.35 State Budget Expenditure in Uttarakhand

S N Item 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-171 Total SchoolEducation 2900.46 3213.23 3624.58 3738.88 3957.28 4510.40 4399.942 ElementaryEducation 1504.01 1618.02 1773.35 1821.23 1821.23 2303.00 2067.033 SecondaryEducation 1396.45 1595.20 1851.22 1917.65 2136.05 2207.40 2332.91Note: Figures are in crore

Alternative Development Scenario and Plan Targets for the Expansion of SecondaryEducation in UttarakhandGiven the status of secondary education in Uttarakhand as on 30th September 2009, anattempt is made to explore the future prospects of secondary education in the state whiletaking up the national goal of universalisation of secondary education by 2020 at the statelevel. Herein the target indicator by which the prospects explored is the gross enrolment ratio(GER) in secondary classes in the state over the years in future.Projection ModelsThe state of Uttarakhand has three alternative possibilities for the projections ofenrolment in secondary classes in the state. One way of exploring future prospects of growth inenrolment is its past growth. Based on which one can project the future enrolment insecondary classes in the state over the years. This exercise applies the rate of growth in thepast as it is. It assumes that the enrolment in secondary classes in the state will grow by thisrate in future.


( 73 )

Table 3.37 Year wise growth in enrolment in secondary and higher secondary levelAnnual Growth Rate in Enrolment and Projected Enrolment

Class

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls TotalIX 91061 75632 166693 98149 85968 184117 100780 87834 188614 100738 92991 193729 101877 93137 195014 103481 94109 197590 101104 90991 192095 100805 90886 191691 103510 93585 197093X 90625 79050 169675 97549 83217 180766 101907 90927 192834 101668 94570 196238 102513 93406 195919 104068 96701 200769 102346 94172 196518 98363 92561 190924 103236 96210 199438

Total 181686 154682 336368 195698 169185 364883 202687 178761 381448 2024

06

1875

61

3899

67

2043

90

1865

43

3909

33

2075

49

1908

10

3983

59 203450 185163 388613 199168 183447 382615 206743 189788 396524

Growth

Rate

AAGR2006-07 &

2009-10

2009-10 to2010-11

2010-11 to2011-12

2011-12 to2012-13

2012-13 to2013-14

2013-14 to2014-15

2014-15 to2015-16

2015-16 to2016-17

AverageGrowth Rate

GR IX 1.26 3.2 2.12 7.78 13.67 10.45 2.68 2.17 2.44 0.0 5.9 2.7 1.1 0.2 0.7 1.6 1.0 1.3 -2.3 -3.3 -2.8 -0.3 -0.1 -0.2 0.0 -0.6 -0.3

GR X 3.8 7.36 5.45 7.64 5.27 6.54 4.47 9.26 6.68 -0.2 4.0 1.8 0.8 -1.2 -0.2 1.5 3.5 2.5 -1.7 -2.6 -2.1 -3.9 -1.7 -2.8 -0.8 -0.5 -0.7

Total 2.49 5.29 3.77 7.71 9.38 8.48 3.57 5.66 4.54 -0.1 4.9 2.2 1.0 -0.5 0.2 1.5 2.3 1.9 -2.0 -3.0 -2.4 -2.1 -0.9 -1.5 -0.4 -0.5 -0.5

XI 62171 51030 113201 70846 64369 135215 74901 66440 141341 76348 73284 149632 78721 73149 151870 76778 74021 150799 78127 75976 154103 81407 75286 156693 78044 74528 152557XII 56582 51358 107940 71916 60013 131929 72000 67051 139051 72893 68997 141590 77033 73782 150815 83566 78534 162100 78217 76361 154578 79304 77736 157040 85477 80970 166538Total 118753 102388 221141 142762 124382 267144 1469

01

1334

91

2803

92

1492

41

1422

81

2912

22

1557

54

1469

31

3026

85

1603

44

1525

55

3128

99 156344 152337 308681 160711 153022 313733 163394 155378 318843

Growth

Rate

AAGR 2006to 2009

2009-10 to2010-11

2010-11 to2011-12

2011-12 to2012-13

2012-13 to2013-14

2013-14 to2014-15

2014-15 to2015-16

2015-16 to2016-17 AverageGrowth RateGrowthRateXI 9.6 9.83 9.78 13.95 26.14 19.45 5.72 3.22 4.53 1.93 10.30 5.87 3.11 -0.18 1.50 -2.47 1.19 -0.71 1.76 2.64 2.19 4.2 -0.9 1.7 1.6 0.7 1.2GrowthRateXII 14.3 16.2 15.2 27.1 16.85 22.22 0.12 11.73 5.40 1.24 2.90 1.83 5.68 6.94 6.52 8.48 6.44 7.48 -6.40 -2.77 -4.64 1.4 1.8 1.6 2.3 3.1 2.7

Total 12.4 13.4 12.9 20.22 21.48 20.8 2.90 7.32 4.96 1.59 6.58 3.86 4.36 3.27 3.94 2.95 3.83 3.37 -2.49 -0.14 -1.35 2.8 0.4 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.9

Note: AAGR- Annual Average Growth Rate calculated by Annually Growth and average of all threeyears growth rate.Here we have five years SEMIS data for enrolment in secondary classes for Uttarakhand.The enrolment figures of the secondary classes in the state are 3.36 lakhs in 2009-10, 3.64lakhs in 2010-11, 3.81 lakhs in year 2011-12, 3.89 lakhs in the year 2012-13, 3.90 lakhs in year2013-14, 3.98 in the year 2014-15, 3.88 lakhs in the year 2015-16 and 3.82 lakhs in the year2016-17.It gives an annual rate of growth for enrolment in secondary classes in the 8.48 percentbetween 2009-10 and 2010-11, 4.54% between 2010-11 and 2011-12, 2.20% between 2011-12 and 2012-13, 0.2% between 2012-13 and 2013-14, 1.9% between 2013-14 and 2014-15, -2.4% between 2014-15 and 2015-16 and -1.5% between 2015-16 and 2016-17. The averageannual growth rate between 2012-13 to 2016-17 is -0.5%.We have five years SEMIS data for enrolment in higher secondary classes forUttarakhand. The enrolment figures of the higher secondary classes in the 2.21 lakhs in 2009-10, 2.67 lakhs in 2010-11, 2.81 lakhs in 2011-12, 2.91 lakhs in year 2012-13, 3.02 lakhs in year2013-14, 3.12 lakhs is 2014-15, 3.08 lakhs in 2015-16 and 3.13 lakhs in 2016-17.It gives an annual rate of growth for enrolment in higher secondary classes in the stateas 4.96% between 2010-11 and 2011-12, 3.86% between 2011-12 and 2012-13, 3.94%between 2012-13 and 2013-14, 3.37% between 2013-14 and 2014-15, -1.35% between 2014-15 and 2015-16 and 1.6% between 2015-16 and 2016-17.


( 74 )

The average annual growth rate between 2012-13 to 2016-17 is 1.9%. It is interestingto note that by gender groups, the rate of growth in enrolment of higher secondary classes isrelatively higher for the girl children when compared to that of boys.The second alternative is while following the national level norms of achieving the goalof universalisation of secondary education by 2020, the state may have to take-up the nationallevel RMSA targets of reaching GER=75% by 2012 and GER=100% by 2017. GER for secondarylevel in year 2009-10 is 70.25%, in year 2012-13 is 75.80% and in year 2016-17 is 84.40%.Uttarakhand is achieving the norms as given by national RMSA target by the GER indicator, theenrolment of secondary. The third alternative future prospects can be based on itsachievement in elementary education. The state of Uttarakhand has made a remarkableachievement in terms of enrolment in the elementary classes. The performance of the statewith respect to the enrolment in elementary classes especially those who are reaching classVIII is crucial input for the secondary level. The following analysis presents the performance ofUttarakhand in terms of enrolment at elementary level.Table 3.38 Year wise Enrolment at elementary level

S.No. Year Class

IClass

IIClass

IIIClass

IVClass

VClass

VIClass

VIIClassVIII Total1 2006-07 235477 203267 196478 183722 166632 155820 140255 131417 14130682 2007-08 237979 221030 214486 199090 166203 171237 158615 146524 15151643 2008-09 243016 218859 220915 206287 193639 185173 173694 164578 16061614 2009-10 239670 209556 207758 205317 194398 184776 177947 174267 15936895 2010-11 251154 218632 210065 204177 200232 191108 183626 178498 16384926 2011-12 247838 224192 214085 204672 200698 191859 191351 184223 16589187 2012-13 236341 222101 217849 207582 202209 192391 194437 195533 16684438 2013-14 239191 224802 223511 218608 211011 194802 194478 198487 17048909 2014-15 238412 226234 223059 218832 216310 197381 193397 193894 170751910 2015-16 241830 222672 220120 215768 214818 203359 198864 195242 171267311 2016-17 231322 217785 213960 210639 209031 200758 199704 195914 1679113

Source: DISE and U-Dise 2016-17In terms of the number of children enrolled in each class/grade at the elementary levelin the State which is given in table 3.38 show an increasing trend up to 2010-11 in classes I, II,III, V, VI & VII all over the years. But from the year 2011-12 the enrollment start decreasingslightly. This may be due to the negative growth rate in the population age group.The transition rate of the system is crucial for the expansion of Education. InUttarakhand for enrolment in elementary classes and transition from elementary to secondarylevel is remarkable.In Uttarakhand it is happening because of the interventions and initiatives under thescheme of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA). Under the scheme, initiatives like PAHAL, Muskan, EGSCenters, Residential and non-Residential Bridge Courses (RBCs and NRBCs). These initiativesin fact streamline the dropouts and over-aged children enrolled in lower classes. The dropoutchildren in the previous grade are pursued and get enrolled for a bridge course to streamlinetheir enrolment in a class suitable to their age. Similarly, it is the case of over-aged childrenstudying in lower classes below class suitable to their age. These initiatives also pursue thenon-enrolled children, firstly to get them enrolled in RBCs/NRBCs and prepare them in thecourse period to get them enrolled in classes suitable to their age.Moreover, it is also to be noted that the drop-outs and non-enrolled increases with theage. Under these initiatives the more number of higher age groups children have to be pursuedand got them enrolled in higher classes. May be because these initiatives the enrolment inhigher classes is higher than normally expected in comparison with the enrolment in lowerclasses.Given the facts, when we consider the remarkable performance of the state ofUttarakhand in terms of enrolment in elementary schooling, the future prospects of secondaryeducation in the state is promising. If the state can make out a strategy to catch the as many aschildren of class VIII graduates and get them enrolled in secondary classes, the state’s GER


( 75 )

would be more than the national target in the short-run. It may be illustrated in the followingparas. Given the projections of enrolment in class VIII, we have used the transition rate for theprojection of enrolment in class IX. A crude form of transition rate is used i.e. ratio ofenrolment in class IX in the current year (2016-17) to the enrolment in class VIII in theprevious year (2015-16).The current transition rate between class VIII and class IX is 93.21 percent inUttarakhand. The rate it is very high. This may be due to the large number of boarding schoolslocated in Uttarakhand. Were large number of students all around of country comes forsecondary education.Transition Rate

Table 3.39 District wise Transition Rate (Year 2016-17)District Transition Rate Class VIII to Class IX

Boys Girls TotalAlmora 98.54 97.10 97.82Bageshwar 101.51 100.58 101.03Chamoli 101.24 100.32 100.78Champawat 98.33 93.33 95.87Dehradun 99.99 98.49 99.29Haridwar 80.13 74.82 77.61Nainital 93.91 95.21 94.54Pauri 97.69 99.32 98.48Pithoragarh 104.23 101.39 102.88Rudraprayag 95.36 96.22 95.78Tehri 91.50 94.29 92.88US Nagar 91.51 92.27 91.87Uttarkashi 95.06 93.63 94.37

Uttarakhand 93.68 92.70 93.21


Projections of Enrolment in Secondary ClassesWe have three variants of models for the projections of enrolment in secondary classeswhere one (Variant I) is based on the past performance and the second (Variant II) is based onthe RMSA norms. The third (Variant III) is based on the performance of the state in terms of theenrolment in elementary schooling especially that of enrolment in class VIII, transition fromelementary to secondary level. Repeaters and dropout children at secondary level.Enrolment projection as per past trends

Table 3.40 Projected GER as per past trend secondary levelYear Population Enrolment GER

M F T M F T M F T2006 234436 219559 453995 136220 109009 245229 58.11 49.65 54.022007 238938 223774 462712 140314 116734 257048 58.72 52.17 55.552008 243525 228071 471596 177935 148557 326492 73.07 65.14 69.232009 248201 232450 480651 181686 154682 336368 73.20 66.54 69.982010 252966 236913 489879 190852 159341 350193 75.45 67.26 71.492011 257823 241462 499285 204706 170908 375614 79.40 70.78 75.232012 262774 246098 508871 219566 183315 402881 83.56 74.49 79.172013 267819 250823 518642 235505 196622 432127 87.93 78.39 83.322014 272961 255639 528600 252601 210895 463496 92.54 82.50 87.682015 278202 260547 538749 270938 226205 497143 97.39 86.82 92.282016 283543 265549 549093 290606 242626 533232 102.49 91.37 97.112017 288987 270648 559635 311702 260238 571940 107.86 96.15 102.202018 294536 275844 570380 334329 279130 613459 113.51 101.19 107.55


( 76 )

Year Population Enrolment GERM F T M F T M F T

2019 300191 281141 581332 358599 299392 657992 119.46 106.49 113.192020 305955 286538 592493 384631 321126 705757 125.71 112.07 119.12The enrolment projection based on three variants past growth (Var-I) indicates theenrolment in the secondary classes will increase from the base 2.45 lakhs in 2006-07 to 4.02lakhs in 2012, 5.33 lakhs in 2016 and further to 7.05 lakhs in 2020. There is a large gapbetween the projected size of enrolment and the school-age population and the gap isnarrowed down by 2015. The State already achieved the GER 79% in 2010 and 102.20% in2017 as past growth trend. Whereas the projection based on the RMSA norms indicated theState has no need to increase the enrolment for the targeted point of time 2012 and 2017.

Enrolment projection as per targeted GERBy analyzing year wise growth in enrolment in elementary classes, transition rate fromelementary level to secondary level and repetition and dropout rate at secondary level theexpected growth in GER is 5% annually after 2009 which is targeted GER for next year.Table 3.41 Target GER

Year Population GER EnrolmentM F T M F T M F T

2006 234436 219559 453995 58.11 49.65 54.02 136220 109009 2452292007 238938 223774 462712 58.72 52.17 55.55 140314 116734 2570482008 243525 228071 471596 73.07 65.14 69.23 177935 148557 3264922009 248201 232450 480651 73.20 66.54 69.98 181686 154682 3363682010 252966 236913 489879 75.45 71.54 74.98 190852 169498 3673202011 257823 241462 499285 79.40 76.54 79.98 204706 184825 3993372012 262774 246098 508871 83.56 81.54 84.98 219566 200679 4324482013 267819 250823 518642 87.93 86.54 89.98 235505 217073 4666832014 272961 255639 528600 92.54 91.54 94.98 252601 234023 5020742015 278202 260547 538749 97.39 96.54 99.98 270938 251543 5386512016 283543 265549 549093 100.00 100.00 100.00 283543 265549 5490932017 288987 270648 559635 100.00 100.00 100.00 288987 270648 5596352018 294536 275844 570380 100.00 100.00 100.00 294536 275844 5703802019 300191 281141 581332 100.00 100.00 100.00 300191 281141 5813322020 305955 286538 592493 100.00 100.00 100.00 305955 286538 592493As per targeted GER the projected enrolment in 2010 is 3.67 lakhs and 2012 is 4.32lakhs and 2017 5.59 lakhs and in 2020 is 5.92 lakhs at secondary level in Uttarakhand. The GERis expected to increase by 5% annually for girls but for boys the GER will increase as perprevious trend because there is no significant difference in transition, dropout and repetitionof boys in last 3 years at elementary level. When target setting for GER at secondary level it isassumed that by 2016 State will achieved 100% GER and this will be maintained till 2020.

Table 3.42 Year wise Additional Enrolment at secondary level

Year Targeted Add. EnrolmentMale Female Total

2009 4676 4379 90552010 4765 4463 92282011 4857 4549 94062012 4951 4636 95862013 5045 4725 97712014 5142 4816 99582015 5241 4908 101492016 5341 5002 103442017 5444 5099 105422018 5549 5196 10745


( 77 )

Year Targeted Add. EnrolmentMale Female Total

2019 5655 5297 109522020 5764 5397 11161All the three variant projection models assume a positive growth in the enrolment ofsecondary classes in Uttarakhand but the rates of growth vary with the model. The annualrates of growth of enrolment in secondary classes based on previous trend projection modelvary from year to year all throughout the projection period. And the growth of projectedenrolment based on enrolment in elementary level, dropout and retention at secondary levelassumed 5% growth per year.

Projections of Enrolment in Higher Secondary ClassesWe have three variants of models for the projections of enrolment in higher secondaryclasses where one is based on the past performance and the second is based on the RMSAnorms. The third is based on the performance of the state in terms of the enrolment inelementary schooling especially that of enrolment in class XI, transition from elementary tosecondary level. Repeaters and dropout children at higher secondary level.Enrolment projection as per previous trends

Table 3.43 Projected GER as per previous trend higher secondary levelYear Population Enrolment GER

M F T M F T M F T2006 205302 191599 396901 77667 65129 142796 37.83 33.99 35.982007 209483 195387 404870 76116 67671 143787 36.34 34.63 35.512008 213767 199268 413034 104017 93342 197359 48.66 46.84 47.782009 218156 203242 421398 118753 102388 221141 54.43 50.38 52.482010 222654 207314 429968 130159 112222 242380 58.46 54.13 56.372011 227263 211486 438749 142659 123000 265660 62.77 58.16 60.552012 231987 215760 447746 156361 134813 291175 67.40 62.48 65.032013 236827 220138 456966 171379 147761 319140 72.36 67.12 69.842014 241789 224625 466413 187839 161953 349792 77.69 72.10 75.002015 246874 229221 476095 205879 177508 383387 83.39 77.44 80.532016 252086 233932 486017 225653 194556 420209 89.51 83.17 86.462017 257428 238758 496186 247326 213242 460568 96.08 89.31 92.822018 262370 243342 505713 271080 233723 504803 103.32 96.05 99.822019 267408 248014 515422 297115 256171 553286 111.11 103.29 107.352020 272542 252776 525318 325652 280774 606426 119.49 111.08 115.44The enrolment projection based on three variants past growth indicates that theenrolment in the higher secondary classes will increase from the base 1.42 lakhs in 2006-07 to2.91 lakhs in 2012, 4.20 lakhs in 2016 and further to 6.06 lakhs in 2020. There is a large gapbetween the projected size of enrolment and the school-age population and the gap isnarrowed down by 2015. The State has already achieved the GER 56% in 2010 and 92.82% in2017 as past growth trend. Whereas the projection based on the RMSA norms indicated theState has no need to increase the enrolment for the targeted point of time 2012 and 2017.

Enrolment projection as per targeted GERBy analyzing year wise growth in enrolment in elementary classes, transition rate fromelementary level to secondary level and repetition and dropout rate at higher secondary levelthe expected growth in GER is 5% annually after 2009 which is targeted GER for next year.Table 3.44 Target GER


2006 234436 219559 453995 58.11 49.65 54.02 136220 109009 2452292007 238938 223774 462712 58.72 52.17 55.55 140314 116734 2570482008 243525 228071 471596 73.07 65.14 69.23 177935 148557 3264922009 248201 232450 480651 73.20 66.54 69.98 181686 154682 3363682010 252966 236913 489879 75.45 71.54 74.98 190852 169498 367320


( 78 )


2011 257823 241462 499285 79.40 76.54 79.98 204706 184825 3993372012 262774 246098 508871 83.56 81.54 84.98 219566 200679 4324482013 267819 250823 518642 87.93 86.54 89.98 235505 217073 4666832014 272961 255639 528600 92.54 91.54 94.98 252601 234023 5020742015 278202 260547 538749 97.39 96.54 99.98 270938 251543 5386512016 283543 265549 549093 100.00 100.00 100.00 283543 265549 5490932017 288987 270648 559635 100.00 100.00 100.00 288987 270648 5596352018 294536 275844 570380 100.00 100.00 100.00 294536 275844 5703802019 300191 281141 581332 100.00 100.00 100.00 300191 281141 5813322020 305955 286538 592493 100.00 100.00 100.00 305955 286538 592493

Table 3.45 Year wise Additional Enrolment at higher secondary level

Year Targeted Add. EnrolmentM F T

2009 4389 3975 83642010 4498 4072 85702011 4609 4172 87812012 4724 4274 89972013 4841 4379 92192014 4961 4486 94482015 5085 4597 96822016 5212 4710 99222017 5342 4827 101692018 4943 4584 95272019 5038 4672 97102020 5134 4762 9896All the three variant projection models assume a positive growth in the enrolment ofsecondary classes in Uttarakhand but the rates of growth vary with the model. The annual rateof growth of enrolment in higher secondary classes based on previous trend projection modelis varying from year to year all throughout the projection period. And the growth of projectedenrolment based on enrolment in elementary level, dropout and retention at higher secondarylevel assumed 5% growth per year.

Distribution of Projected Enrolment by School ManagementWhen we consider the above projections of enrolment in secondary classes for theprojections of required resources we have to differentiate between the schools managed orfunded by the state government departments and the other agencies. It is important because ofthe projections with respect to cost of increasing enrolment will apply only to that ofenrolment in schools managed or funded by departments of the state government. All the otherschools managed by central government agencies or private bodies have nothing to do withstate government financing of secondary school education.Table 3.46 Projected Enrolment by School Management at Secondary level

Year State LB Central Aided Unaided Total2009 191562 2355 5180 56913 80358 3363682010 209189 2571 5657 62151 87753 3673202011 227422 2795 6150 67568 95402 3993372012 246279 3027 6660 73170 103312 4324482013 265776 3267 7187 78963 111491 4666832014 285931 3515 7732 84951 119945 5020742015 306762 3771 8295 91140 128684 5386512016 312708 3844 8456 92907 131178 5490932017 318712 3917 8618 94690 133697 5596352018 324831 3993 8784 96508 136264 5703802019 331069 4069 8953 98361 138880 5813322020 337425 4147 9124 100250 141547 592493


( 79 )

Table 3.47 Projected Enrolment by School Management at Higher Secondary levelYear State Govt. LB Central Aided Unaided Total2009 125940 1548 3406 37417 52831 2211412010 138035 1697 3733 41011 57905 2423802011 151293 1860 4091 44950 63466 2656602012 165824 2038 4484 49267 69562 2911752013 181750 2234 4915 53998 76243 3191402014 199207 2449 5387 59185 83565 3497922015 218339 2684 5904 64869 91591 3833872016 239309 2941 6471 71099 100388 4202092017 262293 3224 7093 77928 110030 4605682018 287485 3534 7774 85413 120597 5048032019 315096 3873 8521 93616 132180 5532862020 345360 4245 9339 102607 144875 606426

Projected components wise demandThe increasing in the size of enrolment definitely requires the additional resources.Herein we have presented the estimated number of up-gradation of upper primary schools andsecondary school, additional teachers, classrooms and other infrastructural facilities requiredto serve the additional enrolment projected.a. Upgradation of upper primary schools in secondary school- The demand for up-gradation of upper primary school in secondary school is estimated based on the normsof distance and child enrolment. For this purpose school mapping exercise did at blocklevel and block planning team analyzed the result of school mapping and additionalenrolment. The same exercise did for up-gradation of secondary school in highersecondary school and the demand generated. The GIS mapping exercise also proposedfor actual demand ratification of school upgradation.b. Demand of Teacher- The teacher demand is estimated based on the norms of pupilteacher ratio 30:1 and also based on subject-wise teacher. Every secondary schoolshould have a minimum 07 subject teachers and 01 head teacher.c. Demand for Classroom- In the case of estimated demand for classrooms is based onthe norms pupil classroom ratio 30:1 in existing schools and for upgraded secondaryschool atleast one classroom for one section.d. Other infrastructural facilities- For up-gradation of new school the followinginfrastructural facilities are demanded on the based of child enrolment.

S.No. Particulars No of units Unit size in sq. mts.1 Laboratory (integrated) 1 662 Principal room (attached toilet) 1 663 Office and staff room 1 664 Teaching staff room (attached toilet) 2 665 Computer lab 1 666 Library 1 1007 Art/craft room 1 668 Girls activity room 1 669 Toilet –Boys (Friendly to CWSN) 1 2810 Toilets-Girls (Friendly to CWSN) 1 2811 Drinking water facility *12 Ramp for physically challenged *


( 80 )

e. Strengthening of existing school- Infrastructural facilities development of existingschools is major activities undertaken in RMSA. The following facilities are demandedfor strengthening of existing schools.S.

No. Particulars No ofunits Norms1 Additional Classroom 1 Classroom pupil ratio 1:401 Laboratory (integrated) 1 Every secondary school as per required2 Principal room (attached toilet) 1 Every secondary school as per required3 Lab equipments As perrequired Every secondary school as per required4 Office and staff room 1 Every secondary school as per required5 Computer lab 1 Every secondary school as per required6 Library 1 Every secondary school as per required7 Art/craft room 1 Every secondary school as per required8 Girls activity room 1 Every secondary school as per required9 Toilet –Boys (Friendly to CWSN) 1 Every secondary school as per required10 Toilets-Girls (Friendly to CWSN) 1 Every secondary school as per required11 Drinking water facility Every secondary school as per required12 Ramp for physically challenged Every secondary school as per required13 Development of playground 1 --14 Repairing and innovation 1 Every secondary school as per required

f. Demand for Academic Resources: The planning team focussed on universalization ofsecondary education as per required quality. To achieved this major goal of RMSA wehad focussed on strengthening of academic resources and capacity building of teachersand other academic persons and institutions. Purchase of books, periodical newspaper,study tours, excursion trips, school annual grant, remedial teaching, teacher training,strengthening of DIETs/SCERT/SIEMAT, capacity building for educational institutionaland personnel, learning corners, teachers and others staff etc are demanded forimprovement of quality of secondary schools.g. Demand for bridging social and gender gaps- For bridging the gender gap thedemand generated on the base on dropout rate, additional enrolment, out of school girlsand special imitative like school dress, books and stationary, transport facilities,remedial teachings and innovative programmes are proposed. Similarly in the case ofbridging social gaps the same activities are proposed in perspective plan.h. Demand for out of school children- The projection of out of school children atsecondary level is estimated based on dropout rate of each class and transition ratefrom upper primary to secondary and secondary to higher secondary level. Tostreamline these out of school children in school we proposed bridge courses/specialcoaching, alternative schooling/crash courses, transport facilities and voucher schemein PPP mode.i. Demand for CWSN- Identification of CWSN is a typical process at school level. Toachieve the goal of universalization of secondary education it is necessary to considerthe all kind of children for this we proposed health checkup camps, parent counselling,distribution of aids and appliances, scot facility and sensitization programmes forchildren with special needs.j. Demand for community participation- Community participation play major role inenrolment, retention and quality education of children at secondary level. Socommunity training, ralies, kala-jathas, nukkar-nataks, community melas, educationaltours and other sensitization programmes are proposed in perspective plan.


( 81 )

k. Demand for ICT-ICT play a major role for quality education. Uttarakhand haveinitiation the use of ICT in education year 2002-03. Government of Uttarakhand hadsign MOU with Microsoft Corporation to trained teacher for using the ICT in education.Microsoft Corporation established "Microsoft Academy" at Dehradun.The Demand for financial resourcesGiven the enrolment projections at secondary level over more than a decade forUttarakhand, it needs the estimation of financial resources required for the schooling of theprojected enrolment for the secondary classes in the state.Financial resources required are two types: one is of development cost which is non-recurring in nature, and the other is recurring costs. The development costs includes the cost ofconstruction of a new school, construction of additional classrooms, rooms for other purposes(Head Master, Staff, Administration), science laboratory, library, toilet blocks, setting upteaching-learning equipment (TLEs) etc.In terms of the development cost of secondary school education in Uttarakhand, thefinancial resources required will be for the strengthening of existing schools with secondaryclasses as many of the schools found to be without basic facilities. The strengthening is withrespect to the construction of additional classrooms, science laboratory, library rooms, toiletblocks and the other rooms required.For the expansion of secondary education in Uttarakhand, upgradation of upperprimary school is one of the pathways. There are a large number of upper primary schoolswhich have a nearest high school at the distance 5 Kms. and above. All these schools may haveto be upgraded but the viability consideration takes into account those middle schools whichare having number of class VIII graduates at least 30 and willing to get enrolled in class IX. Forthis purpose about 340 upper primary schools are planned to be upgraded during perspectiveplan. These schools are distributed over years within the respective plan periods.

Chapter - 4 : Planning Process

( 82 )

Chapter - 4Planning Process

4.1 Planning ProcessFor Effective Planning of Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Secondary Level, the statedecided to adopt four tier planning process.1. Creation of Planning Core Group at different level.2. Orientation and Capacity building of planning core groups.3. Plan preparation exercise.4. Implementation and Mentoring.4.2 Creation of Planning Core GroupsA Core Group of Governmental and Non-Governmental officials constituted at differentlevel to adopt the micro planning concept for involvement of local authorities/PRIs/NGO's andother departments in planning process.4.2.1 School LevelA Core Group including SMDC/SMC and PRIs members, constituted at school level. Thecomposition of school level planning team is as follows-1. President SMDCs/SMCs and O2 SMDC/SMC members.2. Elected member of PRIs/Urban local bodies (nominated by Gram Pradhan/chairmanurban area).3. O5 -Teachers of school (O1 Science, O1 Language and O1 Social Science, 01 Maths, andO1 Other) nominated by principal.4. Civil work experts (Local civil work agency members).5. School level construction and academic committee members.The School level planning Team did "Micro planning'' exercise at school level with thehelp of SMDC/SMC, School Building Supervision Committee and School Academic Committee.This team also updated the child tracking register and co-ordinated with block level planningteam. The school level planning team also prepared the school improvement plan (SIP), afteranalyzing the physical and academic needs of schools. This team also suggested the possiblestrategies, organization and use of local resources for improvement of physical and academicinfrastructure of school. Orientation of school level planning did at school level. School LevelPlanning Team (SLPT) analyse the DCF of UDISE.All secondary schools prepared child tracking Register for class VIII children of theserved Junior High School secondary school principal also accountable for enrolment of allclass VIII passed children in class IX. SMDC/SMC find out the ways for conversance with otherschemes and funds for improvement of infrastructures.4.2.2 Block Level Planning Team (BLPT)Block Project Office is first monitoring and supervision agency for RMSA. This is alsoagency for scrutinizing and appraisal for school improvement plan. Block level planning teamis constituted at Block level by following members.1. Block Education Officer Chairman2. Deputy Block Education Officer Member3. BRC Coordinator, SSA Member4. Junior Engineer (Block level) Member5. DIET faculty Member6. Two principal GIC/GHSS Member7. Two elected Kshetra Panchyat member (Nominated by Block Pramukh one fromSC/ST/OBC communities). MemberOne NGO representative Member


( 83 )

The Block level planning team analyzed the school improvement plan and approved therequirements/strategies proposed by schools as per actual needs of school. BLPT is fullyresponsible for 100% checking of UDISE data. School Mapping exercise done at cluster (Groupof 6-10 Secondary Schools) level and consolidated at Block Level. Upgradation of schools ornew school proposal prepared at block level after school mapping exercise.4.2.3 District Level Planning TeamDistrict Plan is basic documentary plan for integrated RMSA schemes, which indicatethe actual progress, requirements, implementation strategies, monitoring and managementstructure and budgetary provisions.A Core Group of governmental and non-governmental person constituted at the districtlevel. Composition of District planning team is as follows.1. Chief Education Officer Chairman2. District Project Officer/DEO (M) Member Secretary3. DEO (Basic) Member4. District Resource persons (RMSA) Member5. Assistant Account officer (RMSA) Member6. District Coordination (Planning SSA) Member7. Principal DIET Member8. Two BEO (One Female) Member9. Teachers Association representative Member10. District Health Officer Member11. Two Zila Panzhayat Member (One SC/ST/OBC/minority) Member12. One NGO representative (Working in education field) MemberDistrict Planning Team involve in:1. Checking and verification of UDISE data.2. School Mapping exercise.3. Co-ordination with other departments.4. Preparation of District Secondary Education Plan.5. Prioritization of needs.6. Preparation of implementation strategies.7. Support to school level planning team for preparation of AWP&B and SIP.District planning team prepared District Secondary Education Plan (DSEP) afteranalyzing BSEP. This team also discussed the BSEP and prioritized the needs. District planningteam discussed all issues of secondary education in respective district and suggestion gave tostate authority for improvement and reforms in secondary education. This team preparedactivity and monitoring calendar in district for implementation of RMSA.4.2.4 State Planning TeamThere is a state planning team at state level comprised as follows.1. Secretary, School Education General President2. State Project Director/Director School Education Member Secretary3. State Project Director (SSA) Member4. Additional Project Director (RMSA/SSA) Member5. Finance Controller, RMSA Member6. Additional Director, SIEMAT Member7. Additional Director SCERT Member8. Secretary, Uttarakhand Education Board Member9. JPD (Planning/Quality) (RMSA) Member10. All Asst. P. D. RMSA Member11. Faculty Member, SIEMAT Member12. Faculty Member, SCERT Member13. Faculty Member, Education Board Member


( 84 )

14. Representative of State Social Welfare Dept. Member15. Representative of State health department Member16. Executive engineer (Civil work agency) Member17. Representation of CBRI Member18. Two DEO (One Female and one SC/ST/OBC) Member19. Representative of NGO Member(It is necessary that at least O3 female members and O1 SC, O1 ST, O1 Ministry Members should bethere in State Planning Team).State planning team prepared state secondary education plan (SSEP). This teamsuggests the reforms in curriculum, examination, and policy making to Education departmentof State Government in secondary education. State planning team also take care of preparationof district level plan, this team analyzed the district plan and suggest necessary improvementin district plan. State planning team is fully responsible for annual setting target, need analysis,implementation strategies and budgetary provision.4.3 Salient feature of the plan are below(i) Integrated Plan for centrally sponsored scheme.(ii) Detailed data analysis of UDISE.(iii) Bared an micro planning, school mapping and UDISE data.(iv) Prepared from school level.(v) Reviewed at district and state level.(vi) Merits and demerits of previous plans assessed.(vii) Census 2011 data considered.(viii) Convergence with other organization incorporated.(ix) Capability of district and state considered.(x) Budgetary provisions are as per prescribed norms.(xi) Internal appraisal of plan at district and state level.(xii) Participation of all stake holders at different level in plan preparation.(xiii) Allocation of state budget taken in to account.(xiv) Approval of plan by executive committee of state implementation society.(xv) Civil work unit cost as per state schedule of rates, approximate unit cost proposedby the state, actual unit cost will be calculated after preparation of site specific detailestimates.4.4 Process of Plan PreparationThe following activities have been done for plan preparation:

S.No.

Activity Duration/Place

ParticipantsSources

Major Issues1 U-DISE Activities Aug., 2016 toJan., 2017 School/Block/District levelfunctionaries. Orientation of School/Block/district levelfunctionaries. Data collection. Filling of DCF. Checking of DCF. Data computerization. Analysis of data. Preparation of planningtables.3 Orientation ofState PlanningTeam. SPO12-13 Jan., 2017 All State PlanningTeam members andState level EducationOfficers. About CSSs norms. Plan preparation exercise. Orientation about revisednorms. Implementation of CSS atdifferent level.


( 85 )

S.No.


ParticipantsSources

Major Issues

Discussion on preparationof AWPB.4 Introduction andformat filling ofU-DISE (State level) O1 day, SPO SPO, SIEMATrepresentative DPO,Data entry operator Introduction of U-DISE. Filling of U-DISE Format.5 Introduction anddata filling ofU-DISE (Districtlevel)

01 day, DPO All BEOs, DPO, DEO,Data Entry operators. Introduction of U-DISE. Filling of U-DISE Format.

6 Introduction anddata filling of U-DISE (Block level) 01 day, BPO All principals ofSecondary Schools. Introduction of U-DISE. Filling of U-DISE Format.7 Preparation ofSchoolImprovement Plan School LevelOct., 2016 toJan., 2017 SMDC/SMC Members Review of last yearprogress Need identificationaccording to U-DISE data8 Orientation ofDistrict PlanningTeam 03 days, SPO17-19 Jan., 2017 All DPT members Brief aboutplanning/Norms andBudget. Data analysis. Need analysis. Strategies forimplementation Ist draft of AWPB.9 Analysis of districtplan 01 days, SPO20 Jan., 2017 District planningTeam. Need analysis Progress review Analysis of districtproposals Analysis of budgetaryproposals Suggestion forimprovement10 Appraisal of districtplan by stateappraisal team 04 Feb., 2017 All District Appraisal of AWPB 2016-17 Suggestions forimprovement in plan bystate appraisal team Diagnosis of districtspecific needs andstrategies suggested toresolve the districtspecific problems.11 Analysis ofIntegrated StatePlan 09 Fab., 2017 State Planning Team Educational indicators,Planning process, Access,Infrastructure, VocationalEducation, ICT, Girls Hostel,IEDSS, Equity Interventions,Quality Interventions,Convergence, MonitoringIssues, Progress Review,Proposed Budget.12 Meeting of SPT forstate Plan 13 Feb., 2017 SPT member Discussion on all relativeissues Renew of previous year


( 86 )

S.No.


ParticipantsSources

Major Issuesprogress. Data analysis U-DISE(district wise)13 Improvement ofdistrict plan 17-18 Feb., 2017 DPT members Include suggestions andcorrection in district plan.14 Presentation ofDistrict Plan byDPO 21-22 Feb., 2017 All DPO and DPTMembers _

16 Review of StatePlan 27 Feb., 2017 State PlanningTeam Members _17 Approval of EC 01 Mar., 2017 EC members. SPT members. Discussion on allrequirement andstrategies proposed.

Approval of AWP&B18 Final Appraisal ofDistrict/ State Plan 03 Mar., 2017 State AppraisalTeam Appraisal process.19 submission of plan 04 Mar., 2017 SPT member Plan submission to GOI.4.5 Appraisal of DSEDistrict Secondary Education Plan (DSEP) are appraised at state level by State LevelAppraisal Team. State Level Appraisal Committee members are following:1. State Project Director (RMSA) - Chairman2. Assistant State Project Director (RMSA) - Member3. Assistant State Project Director (SSA) - Member4. Additional Director, School Education or his/her nominee - Member5. Additional Director, SCERT or his/her nominee - Member6. Additional Director, SIEMAT or his/her nominee - Member7. Secretary, School Education Board - Member8. Finance Controller (RMSA) - Member9. Joint State Project Director (RMSA) - Member10. Finance Officer (RMSA) - Member11. Assistant State Project Director (RMSA) - Member12. Executive Engineer (SSA/RMSA) - Member13. Executive Engineer (Construction Agency) - MemberAppraisal team analysed the need of district on the basis of UDISE data and actualrequirement of school. Team also take care the implementing strategy, monitoring mechanismand financial and manpower resource of district. Team also analysed the physical and financialprogress of previous year of the district. Team given the suggestion for approval of DSEP.After appraisal of AWP&B the district project team revised the district plan.Appraisal of State Plan- Integrated AWP&B prepared with analysis the district plan atstate level. State Plan appraised by state level appraisal team. The team discussed proposalsand strategies.District AWP&B discussed in executive committee meeting held on 10 January, 2014.Executive Committee has suggested many strategies for implementation of plan and directed tofollow the time for achieve the proposed goals. Executive Committee also approved theproposed budget and permitted to submit the AWP&B to GOI.


( 87 )

4.6 U-DISE

4.6.1 State Level

Details on the State U-DISE management systemAt secondary level U-DISE is being implementing with the help of SSA. One Assistantdirector deputed for U-DISE at state level. At district level district resource person planninglooks after U-DISE programme. Training of teachers, BRCs, CRCs done jointly with SSA.Responsibility and the procedures used for U-DISE

Filling of data capture format - Principal/Head master of school Data Entry at block level - BRC/BEO. Checking and Validation of data at district level - BEO/DRP Checking and Validation of data at state level - Assistant Director SEMIS. Combined data with SSA after validation send to NUEPA by SSA. In RMSA no dedicated staff for U-DISE. District RMSA personals being oriented by state level every year. District official worksoriented to the changed in the DCF every year.

Implementation Schedule for the U-DISE 2016-17S.No. Activity Time1 State level training of district PMIS co-ordinator, ComputerProgrammer/Computer Operator 22/09/20162 Printing of DCF 26/0/20163 Availability of DCF up to block level 28/09/20164 Availability of DCF up to district level 30/09/20165 District level training of block/ cluster co-ordinator 03/10/20166 Training of DCF for teacher at cluster level 06/10/20167 To fill DCF according to 30th Sep. 2015 and collection at cluster level 08/10/20168 100% checking of DCF at cluster level 12/10/20169 Collection of DCF at block level 14/10/201610 25% sample checking at block level 19/10/201611 Collection of DCF at district level & 10% sample check 23/10/201612 Data computerization work at district level 24/10/2016to20/11/201613 Checking of DCF district level, correction of discrepancy & validationof data by district level officers 24/11/201614 To provide DCF at school level after data validation 29/11/201615 5% sample check by out sourcing agency 30/11/201616 Sharing of DISE data at district level , to provide school report card atschool level and to analyze U-DISE data for planning 13/12/201617 After Checking the discrepancy & scrutiny of data to provide the DCFat state level 15/12/201618 To develop educational development index 20/12/201619 Sharing of U-DISE data at state level 25/12/201620 Forward U-DISE data to GOI, NUEPA & TSG 31/12/2016

Review/MonitoringFor effective review/monitoring of the scheme by a team of senior officers deputed forevery district. These officers review/monitor the data feeding and correction made in U-DISE.


( 88 )

At state level three workshops were organized. First for filling of the DCF, Second at thetime of data entry and the changes in software and finally at the data sharing.Problems

The strengthening of U-DISE under RMSA at district is very essential. At present due toconstraints of MMER only one personal at State Level is looking after U-DISE and at thedistrict planning, construction and U-DISE is looking after by only one person. Due to lakhs of funds no dedicated machines are available for U-DISE. Only onepersonnel at district level looking after U-DISE, planning and civill work and many otherprogrammes, so it is hard to dedicated full time for U-DISE.

Data discrepancies found In U-DISE sin discrepancies found due to the errors done by SMDC. After examining atvarious level these discrepancies rectified. The officials of Education Department oriented time to time by SIEMAT. Every trainingprogramme includes one day orientation on U-DISE for filling the DCF, formation ofindicator and use of U-DISE data in school planning.

4.6.2 District LevelAt district level District Resource Person (DRP) planning looks after U-DISE programme.Training of teachers, BRCs, CRCs done jointly with SSA.Responsibility and the procedures used for U-DISE

Filling of data capture format - Principal/Head master of school Data Entry at block level - BRC/BEO. Checking and Validation of data at district level - BEO/DRP After checking/validation of data unified data base sent to state level. District RMSA personals being oriented by state level every year. District official worksoriented to the changed in the DCF every year.

4.7 Constraints in Plan FormulationIn above plan formulation process there were many constraints which are following:- Integrated AWP&B being introduce 1st time. Prejudiced attitude about educational system of stake holders. Poor quality of data due to delay finalization of UDISE. Low participation of planning, team member rather than educational personals. Lack of experience in school based planning. Lack of physical infrastructure and man power at DPO and SPO level. Lack of Academic support for secondary education at district level or DIET. Planning tool prepared by EDCIL actually not generated reports. Delay in fund flow from GOI hampers the progress of schemes.

Chapter - 5 : Access

( 89 )

Chapter - 5Access

5.1 AccessFor providing universal access to quality secondary education it is imperative thatespecially designed broad norms are developed at the national level and provision may bemade for each State/UT keeping in mind the geographical, socio-cultural, linguistic anddemographic condition of not just the State/UT but also, wherever necessary, of the locality.Increased access will be achieved by: Expansion of existing Secondary Schools & Higher Secondary Schools; Up-gradation of Upper Primary Schools based on micro planning exercise with allnecessary infrastructure facilities and teachers. Ashram Schools will be givenpreference while upgrading upper primary schools; Up-gradation of Secondary Schools in Higher Secondary Schools based upon therequirements; Opening of new Secondary Schools/Higher Secondary Schools in so far unserved areasbased on the school mapping exercise. All these buildings will have mandatory waterharvesting system and will be disabled friendly; Rain Water harvesting systems will be installed in existing school buildings; Existing school buildings will also be made disabled friendly; and New schools will also be set up in PPP mode.

5.2 To Improve Access The first and foremost strategy is to improve physical access to secondary classes interms of material, resources and infrastructure. Physical access will be improved bycreating additional classrooms in the existing secondary schools. The expansion and strengthening of existing schools and higher secondary schools willbe done according to the need that has been arise from the UDISE data. The state of Uttarakhand has not any proposal for opening new schools. For achieve thegoal of universal and affordable accessibility the state has proposed up-gradation ofupper primary schools. State has already achieved a Gross Access Ratio of 90.87 andmany of un-served habitation is scattered and sparsely populated. Based on school mapping exercise the state will upgrade upper primary schools in therest of the habitation. The first priority will be given to those schools who fulfill all thenorms and are at the farthest distance i.e. in the radius of 15 km or more, then to theradius of 10-15 km, then 8-10 km, and at last to 5-8 kms. Even though if some habitationremains un-served then in that condition the provision of Open Schooling System willbe there. The state norms for up-gradation of upper primary school in secondary school areatleast 5 km radius from secondary school and minimum 20 children will be enrolled inclass IX. State govt. should be relaxed these norms in specific geographical and socialreasons. GIS mapping exercise is going on with help of Uttarakhand space application centre(USAC) and will be completed by in end of this year. To improve the access, hostel facilities for SC/ST and girl children will be provided andfree of cost textbooks, uniforms etc. will be distributed.


( 90 )

According to UDISE data, the additional sections of class in school pupil teacher ratioexceeds will be extended in the circumstance where the enrolment of the students willbe 30:1. The State is proposing the up-gradation of secondary and higher secondary schools onlyafter school mapping. Presently, these are 19 educationally backward blocks in our state according to 2001census. They need special attention in the form of teacher training, remedial teaching,special coaching and counseling for students to improve their performance. Special attention in given for boarder area, SC/ST and minority concentrated districts. School mapping exercise completed in all 13 districts and up-gradation of UPS areproposed on the basis of school mapping exercise. GIS Mapping exercise is completed with the help of Uttarakhand State ApplicationCentre (USAC).

5.3 School Mapping School mapping is a geographical and mathematical exercise, on the basis of thisexercise we can identify served and un-served habitations according to norms. This is a transparent method to open or up gradation of schools according to norms. On the basis of this, proposals prepared to open new primary, upper primary, secondaryand higher secondary schools. For school mapping at first habitations identified. Geographical maps of habitationslying in a clusters boundary have to be prepared, which is an administrative unit forschool mapping. On the basis of geographical map distance between habitations marked in map. Distance matrix prepared on the basis of distance between habitations.

For exampleDistance (Km.) Habitation-1 Habitation-2 Habitation-3

Habitation-1 0 2 1Habitation-2 2 0 0.8Habitation-3 1 0.8 0

After distance matrix 0-1 grade matrix has to be prepared. For example to open a newprimary school the norm is of 1 km .so all the distance which is equal or less than 1 kmdenoted as 0 and more than 1 km are denoted as 1.For example

0-1 Grade Matrix (1 > = 0, 1 < = 1)Distance (Km.) Habitation-1 Habitation-2 Habitation-3

Habitation-1 0 1 0Habitation-2 1 0 0Habitation-3 0 0 0On the basis of grade matrix, new primary school will be opened in hab-3 which willserve to other two habitations.

So that on the basis of school mapping opening of new school in hab-3 is purely atransparent decision. All three habitations will get school facility within 1 km radius. Without school mapping all three habitations will demanding for school, which is notgood for planning and budgeting.


( 91 )

Same this process can adopt to open upper primary schools (norm 3 km), secondaryschools (norm 5 km) and senior secondary schools (norm 7 km).Served and Un-served Habitations on the Basis of School Mapping

(Secondary School)

S.No. District Totalhabitations

Servedhabitations

Un-servedhabitations

Requisiteno. of

schools

Habitationsto be

served1 ALMORA 3618 3379 103 0 02 BAGESHWAR 962 859 243 0 03 CHAMOLI 2051 1808 168 0 04 CHAMPAWAT 1246 1078 175 0 05 DEHRADUN 1634 1459 40 0 06 HARIDWAR 823 783 301 0 07 NAINITAL 1983 1682 94 0 08 PAURI 3640 3546 161 0 09 PITHORAGARH 3170 3009 43 0 010 RUDRAPRAYAG 985 942 317 0 011 TEHRI 2557 2240 57 0 012 U.S. NAGAR 1214 1157 159 0 013 UTTARKASHI 1167 1008 103 0 0Uttarakhand 25050 22950 2100 0 0

School mapping exercise has been completed in all the districts in the year 2011-12.This was first attempt so that the accuracy level may not be 100%. In future thisexercise will be made more accurate. It is proposed to do a survey through DIETs to observe that how many children havepassed class 8th is not going in schools. On the basis of survey the habitations where out of school children will be find, facilityof secondary education will be proposed through open schooling.

5.4 Progress in AccessFor the access to Secondary Education the Upper Primary Schools are upgraded as pernorms, which are:-1. Govt. upper primary school which have no secondary school within the periphery of5km.2. The no. of expected students in class IX should be 25 in upgraded schools.In hilly and disadvantage group dominated areas these norms are being relaxed.The total no. of upper primary school upgraded in 2009-10 to 2016-17 in state arefollowing:No. of Upgraded UPS

SNo. District

Schoolupgraded

in2009-10

Schoolupgraded

in2010-11

Schoolupgraded

in2011-12

Schoolupgrade

d in2013-14

Schoolupgraded

in2015-16

Schoolupgraded

in2016-17

Total

No. ofschool

functioning1 Almora 04 07 14 03 0 0 28 282 Bageshwar 02 05 08 02 01 0 18 183 Champawat 0 05 11 04 0 0 20 204 Chamoli 02 05 11 03 01 0 22 225 Dehradun 03 04 08 12 0 0 27 276 Haridwar 02 07 09 07 05 0 30 257 Nainital 01 05 07 0 0 0 13 138 Tehri 03 03 12 04 01 0 23 239 Pithoragarh 02 06 22 0 0 0 30 3010 Pauri 01 03 10 01 0 0 15 1511 Rudraprayag 01 02 03 01 0 0 07 0712 U.S. Nagar 01 03 19 04 0 01 28 27


( 92 )

SNo. District

Schoolupgraded

in2009-10

Schoolupgraded

in2010-11

Schoolupgraded

in2011-12

Schoolupgrade

d in2013-14

Schoolupgraded

in2015-16

Schoolupgraded

in2016-17

Total

No. ofschool

functioning13 Uttarkashi 01 03 13 01 01 0 19 18Total 23 58 147 42 09 01 280 273

Status of District-wise and Year-wise School Upgraded and FunctioningS.

No. District 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2013-14 2015-16 2016-17Sanc. Func. Sanc. Func. Sanc. Sanc. Sanc. Func. Sanc. Func. Sanc. Func.1 Dehradun 03 03 04 04 08 08 12 12 0 0 0 02 Haridwar 02 02 07 07 09 09 07 07 05 0 0 03 Tehri 03 03 03 03 12 12 04 04 01 01 0 04 Uttarkashi 01 01 03 03 13 13 01 01 01 0 0 05 Pauri 01 01 03 03 10 10 01 01 0 0 0 06 Chamoli 02 02 05 05 11 11 03 03 01 01 0 07 Rudraprayag 01 01 02 02 03 03 01 01 0 0 0 08 Almora 04 04 07 07 14 14 03 03 0 0 0 09 Bageshwar 02 02 05 05 08 08 02 02 01 01 0 010 Champawat 0 0 05 05 11 11 04 04 0 0 0 011 Nainital 01 01 05 05 07 07 0 0 0 0 0 012 Pithoragarh 02 02 06 06 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 013 US Nagar 01 01 03 03 19 19 04 04 0 0 01 0

Total 23 23 58 58 147 147 42 42 09 03 01 0

Physical infrastructure given to all upgraded schoolS.

No. InfrastructureProvided

to eachschool

No. of Infrastructure

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2013-14 2015-16 2016-17 Total1 Classroom 02/04 137 140 364 45 22 04 7122 Head master 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 2803 Office room 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 2804 Library room 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 2805 Computer room 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 2806 Laboratory 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 2807 Art and Craft room 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 2808 Toilet block 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 2809 Lab equipment 01 23 58 147 42 09 01 280The unit cost sanctioned for a upgraded secondary school by the GOI in the year 2009-10 to 2011-12 is Rs 46.86 lakhs for 01 sanction school are Rs 58.12 lakhs for 02 section schoolsincluding furniture, which is not sufficient. State govt. proposed the separate unit cost for hillyand plain area, according to state PWD norms. State govt. prepared school specific design andestimates to all upgraded schools separately. The unit cost for each construction work is as perblock level SOR.State Government has nominated Rural Engineering Service Department & IrrigationDepartment, Uttarakhand as construction agency in year 2010-11. State Government has alsonominated State PWD as construction agency in year 2015-16. As per GOI norms SMCs/SMDCsare responsible for construction of civil works up to Rs. 30.00 lakhs. Construction agencyprepared site specific design and estimates after physical verification of each and every civilwork. Local community provide free of cost land for school building. Planning Department isdoing third party evaluation of civil works cost of more than Rs. 1.00 crore & State PWDnominated for third party evaluation of civil works cost of less than Rs. 1.00 crore.5.5 Proposed Salary for Head Master/TeacherThe salary proposed for Head Master @ Rs. 70,000/month, Assistant Teacher @ Rs.60,000/month as per keeping in view the recommendations of 7th Pay Commission. GOIapproved minimum amount of entry level pay scale but State Government paid actual amountdrawn by Head Master or Teachers. State Government has borne Rs. 20.25 Crore additionalamount for salary of teachers in year 2016-17.


( 93 )

Sanctioned Post in Up-graded schools in previous years:(Rs. in lakh)

S.No. No. ofSchool Designation Nos. Unit Cost Proposed

Budget1 280 Head Master 280 8.40 2352.002 280 Assistant Teacher 1562 7.20 11246.40

Chapter - 6 : Equity and Social Inclusion

( 94 )

Chapter - 6Equity and Social Inclusion

6.1 Girls Oriented ActivityThe following activities will be enhancing to girls education and to make retention inthe school in girls students.6.1.1 Self Defence Training for girlsGenerally, girl students have to pass through the isolated and jungle ridden terrain inhilly and rural areas to reach the school. Many of the girl students feel insecure while passingthrough the above mention terrain. Moreover the case of assault on female children isincreasing day by day. So it is important to inculcate confidence in the girl students in thisregard. By providing self defence training to girls we can inculcate the sense of confidence andequip them with self defence skills.The main objective of this self defence training is as under:-Objectives

Inculcating self respect and self confidence. Overcome fear. Mentally as well as physically strong. Basic defence skills.A minimum of 30 students per school will be benefited by this activity. A 244 no. ofschools encompassing minimum 7320 number of girls will be covered for this self defencetraining. The training will include martial arts like karate, judo, tyekando and Yoga. This willalso include yoga exercises. The schools are selected on the basis of the availability of expertsin the vicinity of the schools. The training activity will be conducted before or after the normalschool time. The duration of the training programme would be of 45 days. An amount of Rs.21.96 lakh would be needed for the honorarium of expert for this activity.

Proposal of Self Defence 2017-18

S.No. Name of thedistrict Physical Unit cost (in

lakhs)Total cost(in lakhs)1 Almora 15 0.09 1.352 Bageshwar 15 0.09 1.353 Chamoli 50 0.09 4.504 Champawat 4 0.09 0.365 Dehradun 25 0.09 2.256 Haridwar 24 0.09 2.167 Nainital 10 0.09 0.908 Pauri 15 0.09 1.359 Pithoragarh 14 0.09 1.2610 Rudraprayag 3 0.09 0.2711 Tehri 18 0.09 1.6212 U.S. Nagar 21 0.09 1.8913 Uttarkashi 30 0.09 2.70

Total 244 21.96

Financial RequirementThe total amount Rs. 21.96 lakh would be required for this activity.


( 95 )

6.1.2 Girls HostelIn RMSA under girls hostels scheme in 19 educationally backward blocks residentialhostels @ 100 girls per hostel are being constructed. The main aim of the scheme is to providesecondary education easily to girls which could not be a part of school due to socio-economicbarriers and long distance of the village or habitation from the schools.Target GroupThe target group of the scheme are girls of age group 14 to 18 years and from SC, ST,OBC, Minority and below poverty line category. 50% girls from SC,ST,OBC and Minoritycategories should be admitted in the girls hostels and the girls who passed class 8th fromKasturba Gandhi Schools should be admitted in priority basis.According to the senses of the 2011 in the identified 19 EBB Block the girls hostel arebeing constructed and among them have been completed. The state government alsoconstructing girls hostel in 9 blocks in addition to 19 EBB blocks.StrategyIn 19 girls hostel one lady teacher will be deployed as a warden on deputation. Thesalary and the other benefit will be provided to these 19 wardens as per the project underRMSA. In addition to warden in these hostels lady Chowkidar, Cook, Assistant Cook will also bedeployed on outsourcing basis.6.1.3 Through NGO'sState Project Office, RMSA Uttarakhand has signed MOU between Room to Read andEducate Girls Globally (EGG). These NGO are working in the special focus districts such asHaridwar and U.S. Nagar. They are working in hard core group and they motivated child andguardian to complete the secondary education in there girls child.These NGO's are working in Uttarakhand from last 03 years by own budget.

Status of Girls Residing in Girls Hostel

S.No District Name of Girls Hostel

WhetheraccomodationRented /Own

building/ KGBVbuilding

Enrollment details of inmates as on date

SC ST OBC Minority BPL OTHERS Total

1 ALMORA GH CHAGETHI KGBV BUILDING 11 0 0 0 13 0 242 DEHRADUN GH TUINY OWN BUILDING 38 55 0 0 0 0 933 DEHRADUN GH KALSI OWN BUILDING 22 44 3 0 1 0 704 HARIDWAR GH RANI MAJRA RMSA BUILDING 35 0 10 1 0 4 505 HARIDWAR GH BADIWALA RMSA BUILDING 18 0 8 4 0 0 306 HARIDWAR GH AKBARPUR UD RMSA BUILDING 30 0 16 0 0 0 467 HARIDWAR GH GOVERDHANPUR RMSA BUILDING 12 0 0 0 0 0 128 HARIDWAR GH HARJOLI JATT RMSA BUILDING 11 0 3 0 0 2 169 HARIDWAR GH BAJUHERI RMSA BUILDING 21 0 3 0 0 0 2410 TEHRI GH RAUNSAL KGBV BUILDING 3 0 0 0 36 0 3911 TEHRI GH RAUTU KI BELI KGBV BUILDING 7 0 17 0 2 0 2612 TEHRI GH AMPATA KGBV BUILDING 16 0 0 0 38 0 5413 TEHRI GH SUJARGAON RENTED 8 0 0 0 32 0 4014 TEHRI GH KAUSHAL KGBV BUILDING 0 0 0 0 11 0 1115 U.S. NAGAR GIRLS HOTEL BAJPUR OWN BUILDING 4 26 2 0 0 0 3216 UTTARKASHI GH CHINYALISOUR KGBV BUILDING 18 0 13 0 19 0 5017 UTTARKASHI GH KHARSADI KGBV BUILDING 6 0 26 0 0 0 3218 UTTARKASHI GH GANGNANI KGBV BUILDING 22 0 15 0 0 0 3719 UTTARKASHI GH KANDIYALGAON KGBV BUILDING 18 0 35 0 1 0 54TOTAL 300 125 151 5 153 6 740There are 740 girls residing in 19 Girls Hostels in current year. 14 Girls Hostels havealready been completed and 05 will be completed in the month of June 2017. After theconstruction of own building 100 Girls will be enrolled in each hostel from year 2017-18.

6.1.4 Manpower in Girls HostelAccording to GOI guideline the following posts are sanctioned in Girls Hostel:


( 96 )


PostHonorarium/month

(In Rs.) Nature of Post1 Warden 19 5000/- On Deputation2 Head Cook 19 5150/- Contractual3 Assistant Cook 38 4880/- Contractual4 Chaukidar 19 5150/- ContractualWarden of KGBVs are also looking after the Girls Hostels. 18 Chaukidar, 18 Head Cook &36 Assistant Cook are in position. The contractual post are filled through Out Sourcing agency.All posts will be filled in 2017-18.6.1.5 Girls Hostel Proposal for 2017-18

Recurring Proposal(Rs. in lakh)

Head Unit Cost Phy FinA Recurringa.1 Asstt. Cook (Two) 0.60000 38 22.80a.2 Chowkidar 0.60000 19 11.40a.3 Electricity / Water per year 0.60000 19 11.40a.4 Fooding/lodging expenditure for Girl Child 0.18000 1900 342.00a.5 Head Cook (One) 0.60000 19 11.40a.6 Honorarium of Warden (in addition to her salary teacher) 0.60000 19 11.40a.7 Maintenance per year 0.40000 19 7.60a.8 Medical care 0.00750 1900 14.25a.9 Miscellenious 0.40000 19 7.60a.10 News paper / Magazines and sports 0.24000 19 4.56a.11 Rent 0.60000 1 0.60a.12 Toiletries and sanitation 0.01200 1900 22.80Total (Recurring) 467.81

6.1.6 Room to ReadLife skills are girls’ ability to meet day-to-day challenges and make informed decisionsabout their lives. Room to Read’s life skills education activities are designed for school-going,adolescent girls from economically disadvantaged areas with the goal of keeping them inschool and better preparing them to deal with key life decisions. Room to Read through its lifeskills interventions aims to equip girls with the information around areas that are important tothem and skills that they think they would need to resolve the day‐ to‐day issues in a healthyand productive manner.Room to Read aims to develop five sets of skills, recommended by the World HealthOrganization, in the Girls’ Education program participants. The organization believes that theseare the most critical skills girls need to develop their personalities during adolescence.Room to Read are working in three schools- High school Sikanderpur, High schoolKhubbanpur and High school Chouli of RMSA in Bhagwanpur block of Haridwar with 487 girls.In 2015 220 more girls will be added in to the program.In each school, Room to Read have appointed social mobilizers for the fifty girls’ cohortin each school. Social mobilisers are the first contact person for the girls. Room to Read doconduct several activities in the schools-

1. Conduct life skills sessions with all the girls on weekly basis2. Conduct parents meeting with all scholars parents on quarterly basis3. Conduct teachers meeting with all the schools teacher on quarterly basis4. Resource centres has been established in each schools for the use of all students. Thesecentres consists various study materials, books and other educational materials and runby the children group under the supervision of social mobilisers.


( 97 )

5. Formed the children group and these groups take initiatives to run various activities inthe schools6.1.7 Educate Girls GloballyEducate Girls Globally is working 50 schools in U.S. Nagar. EGG is working in followingmajor component:1. Community Mobilization - EGG sensitized community to promote girls educationspecially in minority areas. They collect girls related data from community. Meetingswill be conducted at village level to create a sense of ownership within the communityand involve them in the process of school development, identification of drop out girlsand enrollment of girls.2. Skill Development-They organized school level live skill training to build up confidencein girls.3. EGG has developed a comprehensive health education package of adolescent girls.6.2 SC/St and Minority Orientation Activity

6.2.1 Promotion of Art and CraftThe activity related to promotion of Art and Craft will be carried out in all the 189sanctioned school in the State. The districts had identified these activities for their schools.These activities related to candle making, candle craft, painting, sewing and embroidery, dollmaking, wood craft, ringaal work (local craft), folk songs, folk dance, woolen works, local herbs,mat knitting etc. The schools have identified the local experts for these crafts. The activities andthe name of the concerned local experts is being ratified by the SMDC/SMC. The directionswere given to the districts to engage these local experts for a maximum of 45 days. Theseactivities were organized after the half yearly examination and the care was taken that thenormal study schedule of the school is not disturbed. The schools are directed to maintain arecord of all these activities. The monitoring is being done by the BEOs and the DRPs. Withinthe proposed of unit cost Rs. 20000, the amount of Rs. 10000 will be for the remuneration ofthe experts, Rs. 7000 will be for raw material and tools and the remaining Rs. 3000 will beassigned for the contingent expenditure. The proposal of the budget as follows:Proposal of Promotion of Art & Craft 2017-18

S.No. Name of the District Proposal Unit cost Total Cost1 Almora 44 0.20 8.802 Bageshwar 15 0.20 3.003 Chamoli 20 0.20 4.004 Champawat 10 0.20 2.005 Dehradun 25 0.20 5.006 Haridwar 12 0.20 2.407 Nainital 16 0.20 3.208 Pauri 30 0.20 6.009 Pithoragarh 24 0.20 4.8010 Rudraprayag 06 0.20 1.2011 Tehri 09 0.20 1.8012 U.S. Nagar 21 0.20 4.2013 Uttarkashi 12 0.20 2.40Total 244 48.80

Financial RequirementThe total amount Rs. 48.80 lakh would be required for this activity.


( 98 )

6.2.2 Motivation Camp for Girls StudentsIn present time parents face difficulty in bringing up teenagers to motivating them to dotheir best, particularly in the academic field.Motivation is intrinsic. It comes from within. Parents and teachers for that matter, cannot force a young person to get motivated to learn more at school. The more they try the moreresistance they receive.The experience and study show that young people who are confident in themselves aremore likely to be motivated to move out of their comfort zone.StrategyThe burning question for parents may be “How do I build confidence in my ward. Theconfidence is the key of success, and to build the confidence in girls students, the motivationcamp will be organized with the help of experts and psychologist. In the first phase the 100selected girls from the 19 girls hostel along with the other girls from selected block studying inclass IX and X. 19 girls hostel are running in EBB under the supervision of RashtriyaMadhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan and in 8 blocks namely Okhalkanda (Nainital), Champawat, GhatChamoli, Thalisain (Pauri), Sitarganj (USN), Kapkot (Bageshwer), Lamgara (Almora),Gangolihat (Pithoragarh), KGBVS are functional. The activity will be conducted in 62 blockswith the help of expert from various fields i.e. lady officer, doctors, counselor etc. The proposedbudget for the activity is as follows:

Proposal of Motivational Camp for Girls 2017-18S.No. Name of the District No. of Blocks Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 0 1.00 0.002 Bageshwar 3 1.00 3.003 Chamoli 9 1.00 9.004 Champawat 1 1.00 1.005 Dehradun 2 1.00 2.006 Haridwar 6 1.00 6.007 Nainital 8 1.00 8.008 Pauri 8 1.00 8.009 Pithoragarh 8 1.00 8.0010 Rudraprayag 3 1.00 3.0011 Tehri 2 1.00 2.0012 U.S. Nagar 6 1.00 6.0013 Uttarkashi 6 1.00 6.00

Total 62 62.00

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 62.00 lakh would be required for this activity.

Chapter - 7 : Inclusive Education for Children with Special Needs

( 99 )

Chapter - 7Inclusive Education for Children with Special Needs

7.1 BackgroundThe students who have not had easy opportunity to be a part of main stream. TheNational Policy of Education (NPE) 1986 put some measures for physical and mental handicapwith the general community as equal partners, encouraging them for normal growth anddevelopment to face life with confidence.The Scheme of Integrated Education for the Disabled Children (IEDC) has been replacedby the scheme of Inclusive Education for the Disabled at Secondary Stage (IEDSS) with effectfrom 01.04.2009. The Scheme IEDC has meant to cover all classes in the school education stage.With the Coverage of children with special needs in the elementary stage under sarva ShikshaAbhiyan (SSA), the scheme of IEDC was replaced by IEDSS under which children with disablityin the secondary stage (classes IX to XII). The objective of IEDSS is to enable the disabledchildren who have completed eight years as elementary education to continue their educationat the secondary stage in inclusive environment in regular schools.IEDSS scheme sponsored by central government and the scheme is 100 percentcentrally tended.The Scheme will cover all children of as 14 + paring out of elementary school andstudding in secondary stage in government, local and government aided schools, with one ormore disabilities as defined under the persons with disabilities Act (1995) and Natural TrustAct (1999).7.2 Aims and ObjectivesThe Centrally Sponsored IEDSS Scheme aims to:

- enable all students with disabilities completing eight years of elementary schooling anopportunity to complete four years of secondary schooling (classes IX to XII) in aninclusive and enabling environment- Provide educational opportunities and facilities to students with disabilities in thegeneral education system at the secondary level (classes IX to XII).- Support the training of general school teachers to meet the needs of children withdisabilities at the secondary level.The objectives of the scheme will be to ensure that:- Every child with disability will be identified at the secondary level and his educationalneed assessed.- Every student in need of aids and appliances, assistive devices, will be provided thesame- All architectural barriers in schools are removed so that students with disability haveaccess to classrooms, laboratories, libraries and toilets in the school.- Each student with disability will be supplied learning material as per his/ herrequirement- All general school teachers at the secondary level will be provided basic training toteach students with disabilities within a period of three to five years.- Students with disabilities will have access to support services like the appointment ofspecial educators, establishment of resource rooms in every block.- Model schools are set up in every state to develop good replicable practices in inclusiveeducation.

7. 3 Target GroupThe scheme will cover all children of age 14+ passing out of elementary schools andstudying in secondary stage in Government, local body and Government-aided schools, with


( 100 )

one or more disabilities as defined under the Persons with Disabilities Act (1995) and theNational Trust Act (1999) in the age group 14+ to 18+ (classes IX to XII), namely Blindness Low vision Leprosy cured Hearing impairment Locomotors disabilities Mental retardation Mental Illness Autism Cerebral PalsyAnd may eventually cover (i) Speech impairment and (ii) Learning Disabilities, etc.Girls with disabilities will receive special focus and efforts would be made under thescheme to help them gain access to secondary schools, as also to information and guidance fordeveloping their potential.

7.4 Type of SchemeThis is a centrally sponsored scheme under which the Central Government will assistthe States/Union Territories and autonomous bodies of stature in the field of education in itsimplementation on the basis of the criteria laid down. Assistance for all the items covered inthe scheme will be on 90:10 basis but assistance for the programme would be subject to policyguidelines issued and initiatives to be taken by the appropriate government for implementingthe educational provisions of the P.W.D. Act.7.5 Components of the Scheme1. It is proposed to provide for educational facilities under this scheme for all childrenwith disabilities that are included in general schools at the secondary and seniorsecondary level (classes IX to XII).2. The Scheme will include assistance for two kinds of components, viz.:-I. Student-oriented components, andII. Other components (e.g. those relating to infrastructure, teacher training, awarenessgeneration, etc.)For the first group of components, it is proposed to provide assistance to States/UnionTerritories/Autonomous bodies @ Rs.3000/- per disabled child per annum for specified items.7.6 Institutional Arrangement for ImplementationIEDSS scheme implemented in the state from 2010-11. According to guideline of GOI,Administrative Cell constituted at State level to exercise the work and achieve the goal ofscheme. The profile of Administrative Cell as follows:

Table 7.1 Staff Position in Administrative Cell

S.N. Designation Pay Scale/ Grade pay No. of SanctionedPost1 Deputy Director 15600-39100 +6600 012 Psychologist Out Sourcing 013 Stenographer Out Sourcing 014 LDC Out Sourcing 01

7.7 Linkages with other departments and NGOIn Uttarakhand many National level institution are working in the field of disabilities.Their help are being taken in different activities of IEDSS scheme. Identification anddistribution of disability certificate become possible with the help of Chief Medical Officers of


( 101 )

respective districts. The orientation of teachers , 05 days programme conducted at districtlevel with the help of Govt. institutions like National Institute for Visually Handicapped(NIVH),National Institute for Orthopedically Handicapped (NIOH) and NGOs working in the field ofdisabilities. The experts from these institutions are also the member of State Co-ordinationCommittee/State Resource Group (SRG).Table 7.2 Institutes, Schools and NGOs Working in Uttarakhand

S.No. Name of NGOs Area of work Contact1 Mangaldeep VidyaMandir, Almora Special School forintellectually and physicallyhandicapped Ms. Joshi Tel: 05962 [email protected] Viklang MandbudhiKalyan Samiti,Haldwani Special School forIntellectually disabled,Awareness camps Ms. Anamika SharmaTel: [email protected] Amar ShaheedSmriti Viklang EvamNetraheen Sanstha,Kotdwar

6 months computer trainingfor physically handicapped,Vocational Training andBraille for visuallyimpaired,Mushroomplantationtraining,AwarenessprogrammesMahavir Singh RawatTel: 9639790041

4 Happy FamilyHealth Care,RoorkeeSpecial school, MedicalservicesVocationalTraining,Caregivers TrainingSamarth

Dr. Rajiv Agarwal Tel:01332 [email protected] Sharpe ViklangSamiti, Chamoli Disabled People’sOrganizationSensitization Programmes B S Negi Tel: 01363 [email protected]

Raphael RyderCheshireInternational CentreLast Mohini RoadTrans Rispana NadiDehradunDay & residential centre for125 intellectually disabled,Early InterventionServices,outreachprogrammes, HumanResource Development, SNAC

Ms. Priyo LallTel 0135 2674901, ex [email protected] Srajan SpasticSociety, Haldwani Early intervention, ParentAssociationRehabilitation and advocacy Nandan Kandpal Tel: [email protected] UNECESS Research& DevelopmentSociety, Bageshwar NIOS Centre, AnganwadiTraining Dr. SharmaTel: 05963 [email protected] Indira RashtriyaChetna EvamSamajothanSansthan, Dehradun Residential Centre forphysically handicapped Mr. Chaudhury,Tel: 0135 2451977

10 Grameen ChhetraVikas Samiti,RanichauriTehri Garhwal DDRC SensitizationProgrammes Mr. Sushil BahuganaTel: 01376 [email protected] Latika RoyFondation4/3A Vasant ViharEnclave Dehradun

Special School, Vocationaltraining, ,Early InterventionCentre, AwarenessDepartmentMs.Jo Chopra Tel : [email protected]

12 AbhiprernaFoundationC/62,Shivalik NagarBHEL, HaridwarSpecial School forintellectually disabled andautism, Sensitizationprogrammes

Dr. Dipesh Chandra Tel :[email protected]


( 102 )

S.No. Name of NGOs Area of work Contact

13 Samarth Seva SamitiSati Kund KankhalHaridwarSpecial School forintellectually disabledVocationaltraining,CounsellingProgrammes

Mr. Vipul SharmaTel : 8449044590/9411176931samarth [email protected] Sharp MemorialSchool for theBlind,Rajpur RoadDehradun Special School and Residentialfor Visually Impaired Mr.Samuel Tel:[email protected] Cheshire Homes16 Pritam RoadDehradun Residential for all disabilities Ms.Mamta Gupta Tel:[email protected] Bajaj Institute OfLearning155,Rajpur RoadDehradun Special School for HearingImpaired Air Cmdr A Kapoor Tel :[email protected]

Anugrah ,HerbertpurDehradunMr.RobertTel : 941205038Early Intervention Centre,Community BasedRehabilitation, AwarenessProgrammes, Aids andAppliances for Children withCerebral Palsy

Ms. VinakshiTel : 01360-251530/[email protected] Golden Key AshaSchool116 Inf Bde,BirpurDehradun Special School forIntellectually Disabled Mrs.Asha Asrani Tel:[email protected] Inspiration CentreKaulagarh,Dehradun Special School for Boys withAutism Mrs.Shaswati SinghTel:[email protected] Jyoti School forHandicapped,Rishikesh Special School forIntellectually Disabled Ms.Ritu BahaduriTel:0135-243263722 Arjita SewaSansthanRaja Road,Dehradun

Special School forIntellectually Disabled,Children with speechproblems, Down SyndromeMs. Neetu Narang:Tel: 0135-2725488/9997305724/9927049171

23 National Institute OfOrthopaedicallyHandicappedDehradun Aids and Appliances forOrthopaedically Handicapped Dr.Dipto MitroTel: [email protected]

Gokul Society forHandicapped1/4, TegbahadurRoad, Lane No. 1 ,Near AragharChowkDehradun.Aids and Appliances,Computer Training andPhysiotherapy Centre forPhysically Handicapped

Ms. Madhu MaikhuriTel: 0135 [email protected] National Institutefor the VisuallyHandicapped

Education &VocationalTraining for people with visualimpairment. Tel: 0135- 274449126 Nanhi Duniya Special school for Deaf &Dumb. Tel: 0135- 2656072/ 274657927 U.S.R. Indu samitiRamnagar.Nainital Parents Counsling.Home basetraining 05947-282009


( 103 )

S.No. Name of NGOs Area of work Contact28 Vijaya Public School.Naogawn Uttarkashi Education Genral and Childrenwith visual impairment.Table 7.3 Members of State State Resource Group (SRG)

S.N. Name Address Designation E-mail Mobile No.

1 Ms. SumanaSamuel SharpMemorialSchool for BlindRajpur Road Low visioncoordinator [email protected] 93581035432 Mrs. AnjaliAgarwal Bajaj instituteof Learning155,RajpurRoad Dehradun Expert [email protected] 93599489553 Mr. DiptoMitra NIOH RajpurRoad Dehradun Officer in charge niohrc @ gmail.com 94567710674 Priyo Lall Raphael, P.O.157, MohiniRoad, Last,Dehradun Head of specialEducation [email protected] 98972970275 Mrs ManjuShighaniya

Latika Royfoundation,369, Phase -I,Basant Vihar,DehradunDirectorTraining [email protected] 9412900546

6 Mamta Gupta Cheshire Home,16 PritamRoad,Dalanwala,DehradunSuperintendentExpert M.R. [email protected] 9897339333

7 Mr JagdishLakhera NIVH RajpurRoad Dehradun Training andPlacementOfficer fax- 0135-2734157jlakhera43 @gmail.com 94120533568 Mr. Kamalveer singh NIVH RajpurRoad Dehradun Principal ____ 0135-25260539 Mr. SurendrakumarDhalwal NIVH RajpurRoad Dehradun Lecturer clinicalpsychology [email protected] 9412053116

10 Dr. K.S.Chauhan Paediatrician CHC Viskasnagar, Dehradun - 941232444011 Amit Sharma PGT History NIVH Dehradun - 90454539857.9 Major Issues

7.9.2 The salary of 36 special teachers for the year 2015-16Under IEDSS scheme for year 2015-16 the GOI has sanctioned Rs. 76.92 Lakh for thesalary of 37 special teachers @ Rs. 18000 for twelve month. The GOI has released only Istinstallment. Therefore only five month salary have given to 36 special teachers and Rs. 40.98Lakh still awaited for the salary of remaining seven month for the year 2015-16.Status of Identification and Enrolment of Disabled Children (Disability Wise)

S.No. District

No. of Disabled Students enrolled in schools

Blindness Low Vision LeprosyCured

Hearingimpairment

Locomotordisabilities

B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T1 ALMORA 0 1 1 13 2 15 0 0 0 4 4 8 17 15 322 BAGESHWAR 3 2 5 14 16 30 0 0 0 3 4 7 13 18 313 CHAMOLI 0 2 2 12 7 19 0 0 0 2 5 7 14 12 264 CHAMPAWAT 0 0 0 11 16 27 0 0 0 6 4 10 13 23 365 DEHRADUN 0 30 30 7 10 17 0 0 0 4 8 12 46 54 1006 HARDWAR 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 1 1 2 48 26 747 NAINITAL 6 8 14 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 6 7 18 17 35


( 104 )

S.No. District

No. of Disabled Students enrolled in schools

Blindness Low Vision LeprosyCured

Hearingimpairment

Locomotordisabilities

B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T8 PAURI 0 0 0 22 26 48 0 0 0 8 4 12 26 13 399 PITHORAGARH 1 0 1 11 3 14 0 0 0 3 0 3 25 22 4710 RUDRAPRAYAG 0 0 0 2 5 7 0 0 0 4 6 10 23 26 4911 TEHRI 1 2 3 8 9 17 0 0 0 6 2 8 25 15 4012 U.S. NAGAR 4 0 4 18 28 46 0 0 0 2 2 4 42 31 7313 UTTARKASHI 2 5 7 6 4 10 0 0 0 6 1 7 20 15 35Total 17 50 67 127 129 256 0 0 0 50 47 97 330 287 617

S.No. District

No. of Disabled Students enrolled in schoolsMental

retardation Mental Illness Autism Cerebral Palsy Speechimpairment Grand Total

B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T B G T1 ALMORA 2 2 4 7 0 7 2 0 2 1 1 2 3 4 7 49 29 782 BAGESHWAR 2 1 3 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 3 0 3 42 42 843 CHAMOLI 3 2 5 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 34 33 674 CHAMPAWAT 6 7 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 11 43 54 975 DEHRADUN 8 10 18 1 1 2 0 0 0 5 0 5 4 6 10 75 119 1946 HARIDWAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 29 807 NAINITAL 6 5 11 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 7 41 38 798 PAURI 2 2 4 4 0 4 0 1 1 0 2 2 9 5 14 71 53 1249 PITHORAGARH 4 0 4 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 3 9 55 29 8410 RUDRAPRAYAG 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 36 39 7511 TEHRI 4 1 5 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 48 33 8112 U.S. NAGAR 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 5 4 9 75 68 14313 UTTARKASHI 4 1 5 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 7 47 28 75Total 48 32 80 29 3 32 4 1 5 7 7 14 55 38 93 667 594 1261

No. of Disabled Students Social category wise IdentifiedS.

No. DistrictNo. of Disabled Students enrolled in schools

SC ST General/Others Grand TotalBoys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total1 ALMORA 9 7 16 0 1 1 40 21 61 49 29 782 BAGESHWAR 22 11 33 12 13 25 8 18 26 42 42 843 CHAMOLI 15 12 27 7 5 12 12 16 28 34 33 674 CHAMPAWAT 9 10 19 0 1 1 34 43 77 43 54 975 DEHRADUN 19 28 47 12 16 28 44 75 119 75 119 1946 HARDWAR 14 14 28 0 0 0 37 15 52 51 29 807 NAINITAL 15 13 28 1 2 3 25 23 48 41 38 798 PAURI 19 21 40 3 2 5 49 30 79 71 53 1249 PITHORAGARH 7 5 12 5 2 7 43 22 65 55 29 8410 RUDRAPRAYAG 8 8 16 0 0 0 28 31 59 36 39 7511 TEHRI GARHWAL 6 6 12 0 0 0 42 27 69 48 33 8112 UDHAM SINGH NAGAR 29 20 49 3 3 6 43 45 88 75 68 14313 UTTARKASHI 12 9 21 2 4 6 33 15 48 47 28 75

Total 184 164 348 45 49 94 438 381 819 667 594 1261

7.10 Students Oriented Components

7.10.1 Identification, Profiling, Assessment and CertificationTo identify the children with special need is very important task. There is a need ofadequate measures for identification of CWSN. For this purpose some measurements have tobe taken up by sensitizing Parents, Panchayat, Community and teachers. With the help of theseorgans of Community, it will be easier to identify the children with special need in primarystage. In identification and certification of MR and Speech Impairment children the problem isbeing faced at district level. So in this regard the help of Mental Retardation Centre "Gubara"established at Doon Hospital Dehradun and Bajaj Institute of learning will be taken out.After primary identification of children in school level camps to be organised with thehelp of chief medical officer of respective district to assess the degree of disability. Immediatelyafter identification and certification, child profile will be made and issued at spot to children.


( 105 )

Budget required for Assessment of Children(Rs. in lakh)

S.N. District Physical Unit Cost Total Cost1 ALMORA 78 0.0020 0.156002 BAGESHWAR 84 0.0020 0.168003 CHAMOLI 67 0.0020 0.134004 CHAMPAWAT 97 0.0020 0.194005 DEHRADUN 194 0.0020 0.388006 HARDWAR 80 0.0020 0.160007 NAINITAL 79 0.0020 0.158008 PAURI 124 0.0020 0.248009 PITHORAGARH 84 0.0020 0.1680010 RUDRAPRAYAG 75 0.0020 0.1500011 TEHRI GARHWAL 81 0.0020 0.1620012 UDHAM SINGH NAGAR 143 0.0020 0.2860013 UTTARKASHI 75 0.0020 0.15000Total 1261 2.52200

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 2.52200 lakh would be required for this activity.7.10.2 Distribution of Assistive DeviceThe children with special need after identification and certification will be cured inrespective field according to the recommendation of doctors. Assistive Device with the help onNIVH, NIOH etc. will be provided as per degree of disability. The assistive device will beprovided to children through ADIP scheme. If the children will not get the assistive devicesthrough the ADIP scheme only then they will be catered through IEDSS scheme.

Required Budget for Distribution of Assistive DeviceS.No. Assistive Devices Physical Unit Cost

(lakh)Total Expenditure

(lakh)1. Spectacles 256 0.00450 1.1520002. Crutches 321 0.01000 3.2100003. Hearing Aid 97 0.01200 1.1640004. Speech Kit 93 0.00300 0.279000Total 767 5.805

S.No. Name of theDistrict Spectacles Crutches Hearing

AidSpeech

Kit Total Unit Cost TotalCost1 Almora 15 5 8 7 35 0.007568 0.264882 Bageshwar 30 20 7 3 60 0.007568 0.454083 Chamoli 19 29 7 6 61 0.007568 0.461654 Champawat 27 18 10 11 66 0.007568 0.499495 Dehradun 17 50 12 10 89 0.007568 0.673556 Haridwar 4 37 2 0 43 0.007568 0.325427 Nainital 2 18 7 7 34 0.007568 0.257318 Pauri 48 20 12 14 94 0.007568 0.711399 Pithoragarh 14 24 3 9 50 0.007568 0.3784010 Rudraprayag 7 25 10 4 46 0.007568 0.3481311 Tehri 17 20 8 6 51 0.007568 0.3859712 U.S. Nagar 46 37 4 9 96 0.007568 0.7265313 Uttarkashi 10 18 7 7 42 0.007568 0.31786

Total 256 321 97 93 767 5.805

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 6.08957 lakh would be required for this activity.


( 106 )

7.10.3 Stipend for GirlsGirl students with disabilities face discrimination. So there is need to upliftment of girls.In this regard they, in addition to availing facilities under all schemes specially targeting girlseducation, will be given a stipend @ Rs. 200 per month to encourage their participation up tosenior secondary level. The bank accounts have been opened as a no frill account and money isbeing transferred directly to the bank account of the students. All the girls with disabilitycertificate of 40% and above will be given stipend. Budget required for activity as follows:Proposed Budget for Girls Stipend

S.No. District Girls Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 30 0.0240 lakh per child 0.720002 Bageshwar 22 0.0240 lakh per child 0.528003 Chamoli 30 0.0240 lakh per child 0.720004 Champawat 25 0.0240 lakh per child 0.600005 Dehradun 66 0.0240 lakh per child 1.584006 Haridwar 30 0.0240 lakh per child 0.720007 Nainital 40 0.0240 lakh per child 0.960008 Pauri 60 0.0240 lakh per child 1.440009 Pithoragarh 31 0.0240 lakh per child 0.7440010 Rudraprayag 25 0.0240 lakh per child 0.6000011 Tehri 55 0.0240 lakh per child 1.3200012 U.S. Nagar 55 0.0240 lakh per child 1.3200013 Uttarkashi 25 0.0240 lakh per child 0.60000TOTAL 494 11.85600

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 11.85600 lakh would be required for this activity.7.10.4 UniformAll the students with disability certificate of 40% and above will be given uniform.Budget required for activity as follows:

Proposed Budget for UniformS.N. District Physical Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 81 0.00550 lakh per child 0.445502 Bageshwar 45 0.00550 lakh per child 0.247503 Chamoli 45 0.00550 lakh per child 0.247504 Champawat 50 0.00550 lakh per child 0.275005 Dehradun 104 0.00550 lakh per child 0.572006 Haridwar 87 0.00550 lakh per child 0.478507 Nainital 81 0.00550 lakh per child 0.445508 Pauri 100 0.00550 lakh per child 0.550009 Pithoragarh 90 0.00550 lakh per child 0.4950010 Rudraprayag 45 0.00550 lakh per child 0.2475011 Tehri 87 0.00550 lakh per child 0.4785012 U.S. Nagar 110 0.00550 lakh per child 0.6050013 Uttarkashi 60 0.00550 lakh per child 0.33000

Total 985 5.41750



( 107 )

7.10.5 Books and StationeryThe Children with special need with disability certificate of 40% and above will beprovided books and stationery. Budget required for activity as follows.Proposed Budget for Books & Stationery

S.N. District Physical Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 81 0.00550 lakh per child 0.445502 Bageshwar 45 0.00550 lakh per child 0.247503 Chamoli 45 0.00550 lakh per child 0.247504 Champawat 50 0.00550 lakh per child 0.275005 Dehradun 104 0.00550 lakh per child 0.572006 Haridwar 87 0.00550 lakh per child 0.478507 Nainital 81 0.00550 lakh per child 0.445508 Pauri 100 0.00550 lakh per child 0.550009 Pithoragarh 90 0.00550 lakh per child 0.4950010 Rudraprayag 45 0.00550 lakh per child 0.2475011 Tehri 87 0.00550 lakh per child 0.4785012 U.S. Nagar 110 0.00550 lakh per child 0.6050013 Uttarkashi 60 0.00550 lakh per child 0.33000Total 985 5.41750

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 5.41750 lakh would be required for this activity.7.10.6 Escort Allowance to Blind GirlsEscort Allowance will be provided to 50 blind girls @ Rs. 0.036 lakh per girl child peryear.

S. No. District No. of Girls Unit Cost Amount inlakh1 ALMORA 1 0.036 0.0362 BAGESHWAR 2 0.036 0.0723 CHAMOLI 2 0.036 0.0724 DEHRADUN 30 0.036 1.0805 NAINITAL 8 0.036 0.2886 TEHRI GARHWAL 2 0.036 0.0727 UTTARKASHI 5 0.036 0.180

Total 50 1.800

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 1.800 lakh would be required for this activity.7.10.7 Teacher Component

Appointment of Special Educator36 Special Teachers have been appointed in the State. The special teachers are beingappointed in such schools which fulfill the 1:5 ratio excluding orthopedic impairment. Ifrequired ratio is below the said ratio, then the appointed special teacher will cater the otherschools of surroundings also. These special teachers will get the salary @ 24000.00 per monthsper teacher. So for the year 2017-18 the proposal of 95 (36 in position + 59 proposed) specialteachers is being submitted before the GOI. For the year 2017-18 the special educators are alsobeing proposed in remaining 59 blocks, if the GOI will give it's consent for sanction ofremaining 59 special educators then the total no. of special educators will become 95.


( 108 )

Proposed Budget for Special Teachers Salary

S.No. Name of theDistrict

No. ofTeachers

UnitCost Total Cost1 Almora 11 (0+11) 2.88000 31.682 Bageshwar 3 (3+0) 2.88000 8.643 Chamoli 9 (2+7) 2.88000 25.924 Champawat 4 (3+1) 2.88000 11.525 Dehradun 6 (6+0) 2.88000 17.286 Haridwar 6 (6+0) 2.88000 17.287 Nainital 8 (0+8) 2.88000 23.048 Pauri 15 (7+8) 2.88000 43.209 Pithoragarh 8 (7+1) 2.88000 23.0410 Rudraprayag 3 (0+3) 2.88000 8.6411 Tehri 9 (2+7) 2.88000 25.9212 U.S. Nagar 7 (0+7) 2.88000 20.1613 Uttarkashi 6 (0+6) 2.88000 17.28

Total 95 (36+ 59) 273.60

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 273.60 lakh would be required for this activity.6.10.7 Environment Building ProgrammeAll community, Panchayat, Teacher, Principal, will be sensitized with the help of experts.Initially this activity will be conducted in 95 schools i.e. 01 schools per block. A One dayawareness building work shop for parents of CWSN, SMDC, Block and Panchayat level electedmembers and Special School Teachers will be conducted at school level. Awareness aboutEducation of CWSN through advertisement in print and electronic media. Wall writing, NukadNatak, Slogan, Pamplets will be distributed /conducted in all schools. The budget required foractivities as follows:

Proposed Budget for Environment BuildingS.N. District Physical Unit Cost Total Expenditure (lakh)1 Almora 11 @.01 lakh 1.12 Bageshwar 03 @.01 lakh 0.33 Chamoli 09 @.01 lakh 0.94 Champawat 04 @.01 lakh 0.45 Dehradun 06 @.01 lakh 0.66 Haridwar 06 @.01 lakh 0.67 Nainital 08 @.01 lakh 0.88 Pauri 15 @.01 lakh 1.59 Pithoragarh 08 @.01 lakh 0.810 Rudraprayag 03 @.01 lakh 0.311 Tehri 09 @.01 lakh 0.912 US Nagar 07 @.01 lakh 0.713 Uttarkashi 06 @.01 lakh 0.6

Total 95 9.5


Chapter - 8 : Quality Improvement

( 109 )

Chapter - 8Quality Improvement

8.1 Structure, Available Human Resources, Resource GroupsThe Academic, Training and Innovation wing is looking after quality related issues inSecondary Education under RMSA Uttarakhand. At the State level 01 Joint State ProjectDirector and 02 Assistant State Project Directors, are posted in this wing. In all of the 13districts, 13 DPO's and 13 District Resource Persons (Academic, Training and Innovations) areworking for RMSA at district level. All academy activities are discussed in SRG.8.2 State Resource Group (SRG)The State Resource Group for Academic, Training and Innovations has also beenconstituted with 52 odd members at present which meets once a year.8.3 Teacher recruitment and deploymentThere is three ways of teacher recruitment at secondary level in Uttarakhand.

(i) Through Departmental selection process: School education departmentprepared a seniority list of elementary level teacher across the state on the basis oftheir academic qualification & ACR. Out of total vacancies of secondary teachers30% vacancies field through elementary level teachers.(ii) Through open departmental test: Department of school education conducted awritten test of all eligible elementary teachers to recruit as a secondary levelteacher. The eligibility criteria is graduate and B.Ed. with regular teacher in a govt.elementary school. Out of total vacancies of secondary teachers 10% of vacanciesfilled by this process.(iii) Direct recruitment: State govt. conducted open recruitment examination for TGT,which are at least B.Ed. graduates these recruited qualified candidates as freshsecondary level teacher. State Govt. has advertised 1218 posts for secondaryteachers through Uttarakhand board of Technical education.The Total Government Teachers are in Position at Secondary level as follows:

S.No. Name of Post Sanctioned Working Vacant1 TGT 17334 14902 2432*2 PGT 11487 7953 3534*3 HM 977 950 274 Principal 1260 467 793*** Against the vacant post of teachers State Government has appointed qualified guest teachers.** Against the vacant post of Principals the State Government has appointed adhoc Principals.Status of sanctioned teachers and recruitment of teachers in upgraded school underRMSA is follows:

Detail of New/Upgraded Sec Schools under RMSANo.

UpgradedSchools

Sanctioned for NewSchools

Recruitment Progress ofHeadmasters & Teachers Vacant

HM SubjectTeachers Total HM Subject

Teachers Total HM SubjectTeachers Total

280 280 1562 1842 80 1330 1410 191 232 423Salary of recruited teachers is being proposed for 12 month and salary of vacant posts isalso being proposed for 12 month for year 2017-18. The recruitment process for appointment


( 110 )

of teachers is going on. The salary proposed for Head Master @ Rs. 70,000/- and AssistantTeacher @ Rs. 60,000/- as per actual salary paid to employee by State Government.8.4 Board ResultsThe comparative board results of class X is shown below:

Comparative Board ResultsYear Students Pass Pass percentage2011 174976 119243 68.142012 178338 125584 70.262013 176823 126319 71.432014 170401 114851 67.402015 169481 119797 70.682016 162865 119667 73.47Achievement of Students based on merit and distinction is shown below:

Achievement of Students based on merit and distinction

Details Year2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Distinction 2426 2983 3787 4142 5457 4908% 2.09 2.38 3.00 3.61 4.56 4.10First Division 19033 22973 24553 23825 26087 24352% 15.26 18.29 19.44 20.74 21.78 20.34Second Division 68492 72792 70015 62523 62548 60749% 57.44 57.97 55.43 54.44 52.21 50.76Third Division 29181 26800 27928 24313 25661 29631% 24.47 21.34 22.11 21.17 21.42 24.76

8.5 Subject wise Board ResultsThe subject wise board results for class X in the year 2014 is shown below:Subject wise board results for class X in the year 2016

Subjects Passed Boys Pass % Passed Girls Pass %Hindi 72948 88.50 72258 89.85English 50728 69.22 44133 74.06Math 62400 75.71 15370 94.75Science 62609 75.97 59281 73.72Social Science 71673 86.96 71015 88.318.6 School GrantThe school grant will be utilized by SMDC/SMC as per the norms of FM&P. For thepromotion of science it is necessary that science activity will be a part of time table at schoollevel.

Proposal of School Grant 2017-18S.

No. District School GrantGovt. School Unit cost (in lakhs) Total cost (in lakhs)1 Almora 261 0.50 130.502 Bageshwar 90 0.50 45.003 Chamoli 200 0.50 100.004 Champawat 105 0.50 52.505 Dehradun 165 0.50 82.506 Haridwar 89 0.50 44.507 Nainital 188 0.50 94.008 Pauri 303 0.50 151.509 Pithoragarh 208 0.50 104.00


( 111 )

S.No. District School Grant

Govt. School Unit cost (in lakhs) Total cost (in lakhs)10 Rudraprayag 109 0.50 54.5011 Tehri 287 0.50 143.5012 U.S. Nagar 123 0.50 61.5013 Uttarkashi 125 0.50 62.50Total 2253 1126.50

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 1126.50 lakh would be required for pre and post tools of all students.8.7 Proposal of MT (Science, Maths, Social Studies, English & Hindi) and KRP (SocialStudies, English & Hindi)State SCERT is responsible for all quality activities. So the 06 days KRP, MT training,development of training package and teacher training imparted in supervision of SCERT.Leadership training of principal will be conducted with the help of NUEPA through stateSIEMAT.The Selection of Key Resource Person and Master TrainerThe KRP and MT will be selected on the following basis:1. Outstanding performance in the previous training programme by the participant.2. The teacher who have been trained through RIE Ajmer.3. Innovative teacher identified by Education Officers during the monitoring of training.4. Rewarded teachers in the field of innovation.

Proposal of MT and KRP 2017-18S.

No.Name of the

DistrictProposal of MT Proposal of KRP

Proposal ofMT (Science,Maths, Social

Studies,English &

Hindi)

UnitCost in

lakh

Total Cost(in lakh)

Proposalof KRP(Social

Studies,English

& Hindi)

UnitCost in

lakh

Total Cost(in lakh)

1 Almora 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.0542 Bageshwar 25 0.018 0.45 3 0.018 0.0543 Chamoli 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.0544 Champawat 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.0545 Dehradun 25 0.018 0.45 3 0.018 0.0546 Haridwar 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.0547 Nainital 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.0548 Pauri 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.0549 Pithoragarh 52 0.018 0.94 3 0.018 0.05410 Rudraprayag 30 0.018 0.54 3 0.018 0.05411 Tehri 68 0.018 1.22 3 0.018 0.05412 U.S. Nagar 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.05413 Uttarkashi 50 0.018 0.90 3 0.018 0.054Total 600 10.80 39 0.702

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 10.80 lakh will be required for the Master Trainer Training andRs. 0.702 lakh for KRP Training.8.8 Analysis of Teacher Training NeedIn-Service Teacher Trainings are important to enhance the existing skills of theteachers. Training keeps teacher motivated as it also gives them a chance to share their


( 112 )

experiences with other fellow teachers. Training in the State is planned by exercising the dueprocess. The process adopted is as under:Identification of Training NeedsThe training needs of teacher are identified through SCERT Uttarakhand by adoptingfollowing process:

Interaction with teachers Feedback of trainings Field visits SRG meetings

Planning of trainingsTrainings are planned after co-ordination meetings with SCERT & the nature of trainingis as under: Subject base training: Subject based training will be imparted on the issues identifiedthrough the training need analysis process. The individual Training Need Analysis(TNA) shows that there are common demand for some of the particular areas in aparticular subject such as:

o Mathematicso Scienceo English

Miscellaneous TrainingsThese training include training on:o Use of ICT in classroomo Training on the issues of children with special needs under IEDSSo Learning Level Assessment (LLA) training which is an innovative intervention ofstate of Uttarakhand to bridge the competency gap of Upper Primary Level beforethe commencement of the curriculum of class IX.o Guidance and Counselingo Functioning and effective schools

Training ProcessThe training will be conducted in the simulation, discussion, project formation,classroom teaching mode etc. and after training project/assignment will be prepared bythe teacher as a part of follow-up and implementation of training. Theproject/assignment and experience of teachers will be shared during the 2 days sharingtrainings at the academic cluster. Monitoring of TrainingsA nodal officer will be appointed by Chief Education Officer of the concern district foreach training site the nodal officer will ensure the logistics at the training centre withthe help of RMSA team. The DIETs, CEOs, DEOs (Secondary Education)/DPOs, BEOs willalso monitor the trainings regularly. An academic cluster will be constituted to facilitatethe sharing of trainings and it's follow-up. The academic cluster will include to 01principal and 02 teachers from different schools. Evaluation of TrainingThe entry behavior/knowledge and exit behavior/knowledge will be assessed by preand post test/feedbacks etc. DIETs will conduct Training Need Analysis and will alsodocument the outcome of the trainings imparted.

Training ScheduleS.

No.Nature ofTraining Duration Issues1 Core SubjectBase Trainings 4 Days (GroupTrainings) Identified as per training needs


( 113 )

S.No.

Nature ofTraining Duration Issues2 MiscellaneousTrainings 2 Days ICT, IEDSS, LLA, Guidance and Counseling, Shaala Shiddhi,Road Safety, Eve Teasing, Protection of Child Rights etc.

3 Cluster BaseTrainingSharing 2 Days The teacher will discuss the follow-upexpectations/project/assignments of the training of coresubject base trainings (Ist : After two months and thenafter next two months)4 Hands onTraining 2 Days The teacher will work on the assignment of the project inthe school and will document the results before sharing atthe academic cluster.The 10 days In Service Teacher Training is being proposed in 2017-18 under theguideline of MHRD as follows:Proposal for Teacher Training 2017-18

S.No.

Name of theDistrict English Hindi SST Total Teacher

Govt. & AidedUnit cost

(In lakhs)Total Cost(In lakhs)1 Almora 299 330 339 968 0.03 29.042 Bageshwar 108 106 155 369 0.03 11.073 Chamoli 167 172 223 562 0.03 16.864 Champawat 97 100 110 307 0.03 9.215 Dehradun 198 200 204 602 0.03 18.066 Haridwar 93 80 85 258 0.03 7.747 Nainital 209 216 253 678 0.03 20.348 Pauri 283 283 345 911 0.03 27.339 Pithoragarh 111 92 288 491 0.03 14.7310 Rudraprayag 103 120 118 341 0.03 10.2311 Tehri 290 368 412 1070 0.03 32.1012 U.S. Nagar 126 106 163 395 0.03 11.8513 Uttarkashi 118 169 193 480 0.03 14.40

Total 2202 2342 2888 7432 222.96

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 222.96 lakh will be required for the subject English, Hindi and SST, InService Teacher Training.Proposed In Service Teacher Training Schedule 2017-18

S.No. Name of Programme Months Duration No. of Participation1 Identification and Analysis ofTraining Need April Second Week 06 Days 65 KRP's2 Development of In ServiceTeacher Training package April Third Week 06 Days 65 KRP's3 Correction of Training Package April Fourth Week 06 Days SCERT Faculties4 Printing of Training Package Second Week of May - -5 Training of Master Trainer forIn Service Teacher Training May Third and FourthWeek 06 Days 9506 District Level Training July Second Week toSeptember First Week 10 Days perbatch 117968.9 State Resource GroupThe Head Master and Principal leadership training will be conducted in the DIETS of thestates with help of SRG, SIEMAT Uttarakhand and the Module developed by NUEPA New Delhi.State Resource Group will be developed at state level to provide training to head master andprincipal. 10 days residential training will be provided to SRG members with help of SIEMATUttarakhand.


( 114 )

Proposal of Training of SRG Members 2017-18S.No. District Proposal 2017-18 Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 4 0.030 0.122 Bageshwar 4 0.030 0.123 Chamoli 4 0.030 0.124 Champawat 4 0.030 0.125 Dehradun 4 0.030 0.126 Haridwar 4 0.030 0.127 Nainital 4 0.030 0.128 Pauri 4 0.030 0.129 Pithoragarh 4 0.030 0.1210 Rudraprayag 4 0.030 0.1211 Tehri 4 0.030 0.1212 U.S. Nagar 4 0.030 0.1213 Uttarkashi 4 0.030 0.12

Total 52 1.56

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 1.56 lakh would be required for this activity8.10 School Leadership Training of Head Master (SLDP)The Head Master and Principal leadership training will be conducted in the DIETS of thestates with help of SRG, SIEMAT Uttarakhand and the Module developed by NUEPA New Delhi.State Resource Group will be developed at state level to provide training to head master.

Proposal of Training of School Leadership Training Programme 2017-18S.No. District Proposal 2016-17 Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 2 0.12 0.242 Bageshwar 2 0.12 0.243 Chamoli 2 0.12 0.244 Champawat 2 0.12 0.245 Dehradun 2 0.12 0.246 Haridwar 2 0.12 0.247 Nainital 2 0.12 0.248 Pauri 2 0.12 0.249 Pithoragarh 2 0.12 0.2410 Rudraprayag 2 0.12 0.2411 Tehri 2 0.12 0.2412 U.S. Nagar 2 0.12 0.2413 Uttarkashi 2 0.12 0.24

Total 26 3.12

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 3.12 lakh would be required for this activity8.11 Professional Development Porgramme for Head Master (PDPH)This training will be given to the Head Teacher and Principals who are holding the fullfledged posts, to develop the leadership quality for the school administration. The care is alsotaken that the Principals who are under 58 years would only be considered for this training.Thus their services could be taken for a longer period of time. The 16 days (10+2+2+2) trainingwill be conducted with the help of SRG members and respective DIETs.


( 115 )

Proposal of Professional Development Porgramme for Head MasterS.No. District Proposal 2017-18 Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 55 0.048 2.642 Bageshwar 15 0.048 0.723 Chamoli 45 0.048 2.164 Champawat 20 0.048 0.965 Dehradun 30 0.048 1.446 Haridwar 30 0.048 1.447 Nainital 40 0.048 1.928 Pauri 75 0.048 3.609 Pithoragarh 40 0.048 1.9210 Rudraprayag 15 0.048 0.7211 Tehri 45 0.048 2.1612 U.S. Nagar 35 0.048 1.6813 Uttarkashi 30 0.048 1.44

Total 475 22.80

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 22.80 lakh would be required for this activity.8.12 Leadership Training for Educational Officer (Only for DEO Secondary)Leadership Training will be provided to district level officers to enhance their capabilityin the field of administration and monitoring. The 05 days residential training will beconducted with the help of SIEMAT Uttarakhand.

Proposal of Leadership Training for Educational Officer (Only for DEO Secondary) 2017-18S.

No.Name of the

DistrictProposal of Leadership

Training for EducationalOfficer (Only for DEO

Secondary)

Unit Cost inlakhs

Total Cost(in lakhs)

1 Almora 1 0.009 0.0092 Bageshwar 1 0.009 0.0093 Chamoli 1 0.009 0.0094 Champawat 1 0.009 0.0095 Dehradun 1 0.009 0.0096 Haridwar 1 0.009 0.0097 Nainital 1 0.009 0.0098 Pauri 1 0.009 0.0099 Pithoragarh 1 0.009 0.00910 Rudraprayag 1 0.009 0.00911 Tehri 1 0.009 0.00912 U.S. Nagar 1 0.009 0.00913 Uttarkashi 1 0.009 0.009Total 13 0.117

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 0.117 lakh would be required for this activity8.13 Project on Science and Maths (RAA)In pursuance of the focus on connecting school based knowledge to life outside theschool and making learning of Science Mathematics a joyful and meaningful activity, to bringfocus on innovation and use of technology, the Ministry of Human Resource Development hasset up the Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan (RAA)- a convergent framework that aims at nurturing aspirit of inquiry and creativity, love for Science and Mathematics and effective use of


( 116 )

technology amongst children and encourage those who show an inclination and talent forthese subjects to be encouraged and supported to heights of academic excellence and research.Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan will target students in the age group of 6 - 18 years and inturn the execution of RAA will span across MHRD’s schematic interventions of Sarva ShikshaAbhiyan, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan in the Department of School Education &Literacy and programmes and schemes of Department of Higher Education toencourage Science, Mathematics & Technology.Background to RAAScience, Technology and Innovation have emerged as the major drivers of nationaldevelopment globally. India, with its near universalisation of access in school education andexpanding Higher Education and Scientific institutions both under the government andprivate sectors, wants to give a direction to drive future innovations by encouraging childrenin exploration, discovery and innovation to support a climate of innovation by teachers andstudents at school level.The Kothari Commission (1964) noted that the destiny of this country is shapedin the classrooms and laboratories of schools, colleges and universities. India’s CurriculumFramework recognises connecting knowledge to life outside the school and notes that learningtakes place both within school and outside school and seeks to design learning tasks beyondtextbooks and schools.The Yashpal Committee report (1993) Learning without Burden expressed concern overthe esotericisation of Science also on the tendency embedded in the syllabi and textbooks toaccelerate children's mathematical skills by teaching mechanical rules at the expense ofunderstanding.Aim While emphasising the primacy of the schools and classroom transactions, the RAAaims to leverage the potential for science, mathematics and technology learning in non-classroom settings. Beyond the four walls of a classroom, opportunities for science,mathematics and technology learning abound.Accordingly, the ‘Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan (RAA)” is planned to provide nourishingand nurturing support to and a platform for schools in a dual track approach to make Science,Mathematics and Technology exciting to children and encourage them to have an enduringinterest both inside classroom and outside classroom activities.Objectives To enable children to become motivated and engaged in Science, Mathematics andTechnology (SMT) through observation, experimentation, inference drawing, modelbuilding, rational reasoning, testability etc. To create curiosity, excitement and exploration among school children in Science,Mathematics and Technology. To create a culture of thinking, inventing, tinkering and doing to promote enquirybased learning in Schools. To achieve learning levels appropriate to the class of study in Science andMathematics. To encourage and nurture schools to be incubators of Innovation.

8.13.1 Proposal of (Science & Maths)State SCERT is responsible for all quality activities. So the 06 days KRP, MT training,development of training package and teacher training imparted in supervision of SCERT.Leadership training of principal will be conducted with the help of NUEPA through stateSIEMAT.


( 117 )

8.13.2 Key Resource Person (KRP)The KRP will be selected on the following basis:1. Outstanding performance in the previous training programme by the participant.2. The teacher who have been trained through RIE Ajmer.3. Innovative teacher identified by Education Officers during the monitoring of training.4. Rewarded teachers in the field of innovation.Proposal of KRP 2017-18

S.No.

Name of theDistrict

Proposal of KRPProposal of KRP

(Science & Maths)Unit Costin lakhs

Total Cost(in lakhs)1 Almora 2 0.018 0.0362 Bageshwar 2 0.018 0.0363 Chamoli 2 0.018 0.0364 Champawat 2 0.018 0.0365 Dehradun 2 0.018 0.0366 Haridwar 2 0.018 0.0367 Nainital 2 0.018 0.0368 Pauri 2 0.018 0.0369 Pithoragarh 2 0.018 0.03610 Rudraprayag 2 0.018 0.03611 Tehri 2 0.018 0.03612 U.S. Nagar 2 0.018 0.03613 Uttarkashi 2 0.018 0.036

Total 26 0.468

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 0.468 lakh for KRP Training.8.13.3 Teacher Training in Science & MathsState SCERT will be conducted training need assessment workshop which is conductedthrough following process:1. SCERT has circulated a format to school to collect training need.2. Feedback given by trainees in previous teacher training.3. Suggestions given by Educational Officers during the school monitoring.4. Analysis of board and LLA result.The 10 days In Service Teacher Training is being proposed in 2017-18 under theguideline of MHRD as follows :

S.No. Name of Programme Months Duration No. of Participation1 Identification and Analysis ofTraining Need April Second Week 06 Days 65 KRP's2 Development of In ServiceTeacher Training package April Third Week 06 Days 65 KRP's3 Correction of Training Package April Fourth Week 06 Days SCERT Faculties4 Printing of Training Package Second Week of May - -5 Training of Master Trainer forIn Service Teacher Training May Third and FourthWeek 06 Days 9506 District Level Training July Second Week toSeptember First Week 10 Days perbatch 11796All 10 days training imparted in those training venues where ICT equipped lab arefurnished.


( 118 )

Proposal for Teacher Training 2017-18

S.No.

Name of theDistrict Maths Science

TotalTeacherGovt. &Aided

Unit cost(In lakhs)

Total Cost(In lakhs)1 Almora 304 195 499 0.03 14.972 Bageshwar 130 90 220 0.03 6.603 Chamoli 199 146 345 0.03 10.354 Champawat 100 76 176 0.03 5.285 Dehradun 217 195 412 0.03 12.366 Haridwar 101 84 185 0.03 5.557 Nainital 238 176 414 0.03 12.428 Pauri 354 233 587 0.03 17.619 Pithoragarh 257 169 426 0.03 12.7810 Rudraprayag 147 75 222 0.03 6.6611 Tehri 384 267 651 0.03 19.5312 U.S. Nagar 129 102 231 0.03 6.9313 Uttarkashi 166 102 268 0.03 8.04

Total 2726 1910 4636 139.08

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 139.08 lakh will be required for the subject Science and Maths, In-Service Teacher Training.8.13.4 Science KitNCERT has developed different types of kits for promotion of science. So to purchasethe science kit for secondary level is being proposed. The kit is beneficial to develop thescientific approach and use of apparatus in the students. The apparatus have been developedas per the curriculum of secondary level. The cost of the kit as per the vide letter no.:24-7/2011-12/DEK/E01/1507 division of Educational Kits dated 20 November 2014 is asfollows:

Name of Kit Weightapprox

BasicRate

[email protected]%

NCERTLicense Fee @

10%

TheProfessionalRate per Kg

Total Cost ofTransportationSecondaryScience Kit 18 Kg 5400.00 675.00 540.00 55.58 802.44The unit cost of the kit after including local freight will be Rs. 7500.00.

Proposed of Secondary Science Kit 2017-18S.No. District Physical Unit cost

(in lakhs)Total Cost(in lakhs)1 Almora 40 0.075 3.0002 Bageshwar 20 0.075 1.5003 Chamoli 182 0.075 13.6504 Champawat 20 0.075 1.5005 Dehradun 10 0.075 0.7506 Haridwar 5 0.075 0.3757 Nainital 162 0.075 12.1508 Pauri 100 0.075 7.5009 Pithoragarh 9 0.075 0.67510 Rudraprayag 100 0.075 7.50011 Tehri 200 0.075 15.00012 U.S. Nagar 21 0.075 1.57513 Uttarkashi 30 0.075 2.250

Total 899 67.425Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 67.425 lakh would be required for this activity


( 119 )

8.13.5 Mathematics KitNCERT has also developed kits for promotion of Maths. So to purchase the 05 Maths kitper secondary school is being proposed. The kit is beneficial to develop the Mathmeticalapproach and use of apparatus in the students. The apparatus have been developed as per thecurriculum of secondary level. The cost of the kit as per the vide letter no.: 24-7/2011-12/DEK/E01/1507 division of Educational Kits dated 20 November 2014 is as follows:Name of Kit Basic

Kit RateVat

@12.5%NCERT License

Fee @ 10%Total Cost of

TransportationSecondary Mathematics lab Kit 1100.00 138.00 110.00 1348.00The unit cost of the kit after including local freight will be Rs. 1500.00.Proposed of Secondary Mathematics Kit 2017-18

S.No. District Physical Unit cost(in lakhs)


Total 779 11.685Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 11.685 lakh would be required for this activity8.13.6 Excursion trip for Students

Status, School, Excursion Committee, Areas of Excursion, GuidelinesA guideline for student excursion is provided to each of the school to carry out theexcursion.Objective

State has adopted CBSE pattern since 2006-07. According to CBSE and Board of SchoolEducation, Uttarakhand a project work has been given in science, social science andmathematics. The project made by students will be connected with excursion visit. Each of the students have to maintain an excursion diary in which he/she will writedown the main learning derived out of the excursion. Students will gain practical knowledge from exposure. According to NCF 2005 for creation of knowledge the activity is most essential.The excursion visit will included the places related to environmental education, localhandicrafts and markets, industrial institutes, national forest and sanctuaries, theatre and artinstitutions, science lab, planetarium, historical places, public offices like SDM office, BDO officeetc. The students who have participated in the previous excursion visit have givenenthusiastic account of their learning due to the excursion. Perhaps it was for the first time thatthe students were exposed to the public offices like SDM, BDO, Post offices and banks etc.where in fact they have to interact after passing out from the schools in their day to day life.The activity will be carried out for the class IX students.The details of district wise student excursion are:


( 120 )

Proposal of Students Excursion 2017-18S.

No.Districts Physical (No.

of Students)Unit Cost(in lakh)

Total Amount (inlakh)1 Almora 9655 0.002 19.312 Bageshwar 3814 0.002 7.633 Chamoli 5933 0.002 11.874 Champawat 3937 0.002 7.875 Dehradun 8078 0.002 16.166 Haridwar 6004 0.002 12.017 Nainital 9628 0.002 19.268 Pauri 7960 0.002 15.929 Pithoragarh 6761 0.002 13.5210 Rudraprayag 3382 0.002 6.7611 Tehri 9713 0.002 19.4312 U.S. Nagar 12360 0.002 24.7213 Uttarkashi 4807 0.002 9.61

Total 92032 184.07

Financial RequirementThe total amount Rs 184.07 lakh would be required for this activity.8.13.7 Exposure Visit outside the StateStudents studying in secondary schools need to be flourished with the knowledge ofscience and mathematics, regarding to the concepts the students will visit renowned sciencerelated institutions/places outside the State to develop innovative ideas and explore the truthof science.

Proposal of Exposure Visit outside the State 2017-18S.

No.Name of the

DistrictPhysical(No. of

Students)

Unit cost(in lakhs)


Total 130 3.90


8.13.8 Promotion of SciencePromotion of science the following activity will be conducted:Use of School GrantIt is necessary to organize science related activities at school level continuously for thepromotion of science. For this purpose every school has been done science related activities


( 121 )

such as science seminar, drama, exhibition, etc. which are mentioned in the list of NCERT. A Rs.5000.00 of school grant is being used in school level. This activity is a part of school time table.There is a need to conduct activities for the promotion of science. Science Quiz, Science dramaand Science Fairs were organized at school block and district level.Science ExhibitionThe subject wise material will be purchased to provide learning in scientific way to thestudents. All the schools will be purchased magazine, newspapers in addition to referencebook. For the optimum use of the material purchased through school grant every school willconduct fortnight activity. The students who will achieved first and second place at school levelwould be rewarded and eligible to participate at block and district level competition. Theactivity proposed as follows:

S.No. Month Activity Proposed1 July 1- Science Seminar2- Essay Competition2 August 1- Science Drama2- General Knowledge Quiz3 September 1- Science Exhibition2- Mental Ability Test4 November 1- Science Fair2- General Knowledge Quiz5 December 1- Maths QuizProposal of Science Exhibition 2017-18

S.No. District Physical Unit cost (in lakhs) Total Cost (in lakhs)1 Almora 1 1.00 1.002 Bageshwar 1 1.00 1.003 Chamoli 1 1.00 1.004 Champawat 1 1.00 1.005 Dehradun 1 1.00 1.006 Haridwar 1 1.00 1.007 Nainital 1 1.00 1.008 Pauri 1 1.00 1.009 Pithoragarh 1 1.00 1.0010 Rudraprayag 1 1.00 1.0011 Tehri 1 1.00 1.0012 U.S. Nagar 1 1.00 1.0013 Uttarkashi 1 1.00 1.00Total 13 1.00 13.00

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 13.00 lakh would be required for this activitySelection of judgesA panel of science teacher formed by chief education officer from government, aidedschool, university teacher and public school teachers. 3 to 5 judges selected from the panel foreach activity.Evaluation CriteriaJudges will observe the project, model, presentation, analysis data, reporting, result,chart etc. demonstrated by participants and evaluate by marking system. Cross question willalso be a tool for an evaluation.Selected students from schools, block and district will be awarded. Awarded will begiven in the form of certificate medal, trophy etc.


( 122 )

ProposalThe state conducts 5 state level activities for the promotion of science activities inconsonance with NCERT guidelines. In the state SCERT is the designated institution to conductthe activities, but there is no provision for organizing these activities at district, block andschool levels. So to conduct science quiz, science drama, science seminar and science fairetc. at school, block and district levels is being proposed. Each DPO will ensure that theseactivities are conducted in the district. These activities will be organized for elementary andsecondary level together. Thus, each district will organize a district level science fair as anevolving event from school to district level. Efforts will be done to dovetail these activities withState level activities. These activities will be organized in between August 2017 to December2017.8.14 Project - Art/Culture and Sports

Kala UtsavRastriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan recongnizes the importance of local and tribalfolk in creating awareness of State’s cultural heritage in the form of music, theatre, visual artsand dance.These programme have been organized successfully in the State. All 13 districts haveparticipated under the umbrella of kala utasav. The students have participated in theprogramme with great enthusiasm and jubilation. Four teams comprising with 38 studentshave participated in the National level in Dance, Theatre, Music and Visual arts respectively atNew Delhi.StrategyDuring the year 2016-17 the Govt. of India has sanctioned Rs. 11.00 Lakh to organizedthe Kala Utsav programme from School level to National level. The sanctioned amount was notsufficient to conduct the Kala Utsav programme. Therefore for the year 2017-18 the activitiesrelated to Kala Utsav programme will be conducted in 5 tiers from school level to Nationallevel. The school will select the teams in one category i.e. from dance, music, theatre and visualart. The block education officer will allocate the school to perform in one category. The selectedteams from schools will perform at block level. Four teams from each block will perform atdistrict level. The selected 52 teams from district level will perform at State level. Finally thefour teams will be selected for National level.Proposed BudgetAll the Govt. and Aided Secondary and Senior Secondary Schools are being proposed toparticipate in the Kala Utsav for 2017-18. The budgetary allocation proposed for the Kala Utsavis as follows:

Proposal of Kala Utsav 2017-18S.No. Name of the District No. of District Unit cost

(in lakhs)Total Cost (in

lakhs)1 Almora 1 1.00 1.002 Bageshwar 1 1.00 1.003 Chamoli 1 1.00 1.004 Champawat 1 1.00 1.005 Dehradun 1 1.00 1.006 Haridwar 1 1.00 1.007 Nainital 1 1.00 1.008 Pauri 1 1.00 1.009 Pithoragarh 1 1.00 1.0010 Rudraprayag 1 1.00 1.0011 Tehri 1 1.00 1.0012 U.S. Nagar 1 1.00 1.00


( 123 )

S.No. Name of the District No. of District Unit cost(in lakhs)

Total Cost (inlakhs)13 Uttarkashi 1 1.00 1.00

Total 13 13.0014 National Level 1 1.00 1.00Grand Total 14.00


8.15 Project-IT/e-governance

Shaala DarpanThis project brings together all its stakeholders, including parents, students, teachers,school management and school governance & administration. It is designed and created toenable services, based on school management systems, to provide students, parents andcommunities all the relevant information relating to performance of students in schools witheffective use of MIS & ERP software applications and mobile technology.Under this project, a series of services will be enabled through Schools informationservices are:School profile ManagementSchool profile Management system will record and maintain details of each schools suchas student strength, area of the school, staff strength, photographs of the structure, a briefdescription of the school and other vital information. These can be accessed by thestakeholders for whenever required.Student Profile ManagementStudent Profile Management will help maintain data of students profile, data of theirparent and siblings, attendance, health records, mark sheets, scholarships information etc.Every students of Kendra Vidyalaya will have a smart card. A simple process of swiping thesmart card in the classroom will mark the attendance. Their parents will get an SMS informingthem about their child presence in the school in their language of choice. Besides beinginformative, this feature will also be an assurance of their childs safety.Employee InformationEmployee Information will manage schools staff details through biometrics and thesoftware will help maintain records of attendance, recruitment, postings and transfers, pay&allowances, appraisals and pension.ParentsParents will also receive report card of their wards on email. The software will provideinterface to record, grade and publish the same in their grade book.Curriculum TrackingCurriculum Tracking Will be about what their children are learning in classes.Curriculum and lesson plans can be accessed and understood.Custom Reports for School Management & Administration:- Will enable inventory. Stockmanagement and vendor payment reports computed and updated.Shaala Darpan will not only revolutionize the conventional education system but take itfurther also to bring about seamlessness in the schools life of a child and become a boon toparents with transferable jobs.


( 124 )

Proposal of Shala Darpan 2017-18S.No. Name of the District No. of Schools Unit Cost Total Cost1 Almora 22 0.20 4.402 Bageshwar 6 0.20 1.203 Chamoli 18 0.20 3.604 Champawat 8 0.20 1.605 Dehradun 12 0.20 2.406 Haridwar 12 0.20 2.407 Nainital 16 0.20 3.208 Pauri 30 0.20 6.009 Pithoragarh 16 0.20 3.2010 Rudraprayag 6 0.20 1.2011 Tehri 18 0.20 3.6012 U.S. Nagar 14 0.20 2.8013 Uttarkashi 12 0.20 2.40

Total 190 38.00


8.16 Identification of Learning Gaps and Enhancement of Learning Level at secondarystage (Arohan)

IntroductionThe Government of Uttarakhand has adopted CBSE syllabus in place of traditional ownboard syllabus. RTE & CCE have been implemented in the state at the elementary level. Afterthe introduction of RTE, the class IX has become the crucial juncture for the students. Therewas a need to give them some supplements in the form of qualitative educational activity toexplore their learning gaps. Hence the activity Learning Level Assessment has been introducedat class IX to identify the gaps of students.RationaleNow a day there is paradigm shift in every part of the world and the shift also hasshown in teaching learning process. The big gap has occurred and to bridge the gap newapproaches should be introduced. Teacher plays a role of guide and facilitator for student,while student it self in a role of creator of knowledge. The poor enforcement of teacher'saccountability and no detention imperative up to class VIII under RTE Act might be the reasonfor learning gaps.So to eradicate the learning gaps, elevate the confidence level and to reduce dropoutrates of students, the activity Learning Level Assessment has risen on the horizon of secondaryeducation.According to the State report card of National Achievement Survey (NAS) the averageperformance of students in the State was significantly lower than the national average inEnglish, Mathematics, Science, Social Science and MIL-Hindi. To improve average performanceof students in these subjects Learning Level Assessment porgramme is being conducted.Target GroupAll students of class IX in Government and Government aided schools.StrategyThe programme has been implemented in following steps:


( 125 )

1. Meeting of State Resource Group (SRG)A meeting of SRG organized at state level. A programme of action has been scheduledand a group of subject experts has been identified for preparation of tools in this meeting.2. Mapping of Subject-wise Competencies for Class VIII and IXMeeting of subject experts organized at state level and carried out the followingactivities: Analysis of Class VIII and Class IX syllabus. Identification of common topics in four core subject (Hindi, English, Maths & Science)for class VIII & IX. Identification of competencies in common topics. Prioritization of minimum required competencies for remedial teaching.

3. Development of ToolsChild friendly and competency based assessment tools in four core subject i.e. Hindi,English, Maths & Science have been prepared by group of experts.Subject-wise and competency-wise formats for child achievement profile havedeveloped and instructions for principals and teachers delivered. Validation of pre and posttools have been done by subject specialist. In place of traditional marking system new threetier achievement level system has been introduced.(1) Not Achieved : NA (2) Partially Achieved : PA (3) Achieved : A

4. TrainingKRPs, MTs & BEOs have been trained with the help of SIEMAT. These trained KRPs, MTs& BEOs have given training to principals and teachers at district/block level.5. Identification of Learning Gaps (Base Line -Test)The identification of learning gaps have been identified with the help of child friendlyassessment on prescribed tool by state level. The methods of assessment adopted are writtentest, oral test, group discussion & group activities.6. Mapping of Learning Gaps and Remedial AreasMapping of learning gaps and remedial areas have been found out with the help of tablegiven herein (example):School:..................................... Subject:..............................

Name of Student Competencies1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...... ...... 14 15Student 1 A A PA PA NA A AStudent 2 NA A NA A PA A AStudent 3 A A NA A PA A AStudent 4 PA A PA A PA A AStudent 5 PA PA NA A PA A AStudent 6 A NA A PA A A PAStudent 7 NA A NA A A A PAStudent 8 A A PA NA PA PA PA

Total (NA+PA) 04 02 07 03 06 01 03Priority Areas for Remediation:1. Topic-3 2. Topic-5 3. Topic-1 4. Topic-4 & 7 5. Topic-2 6. Topic-6

7. Remedial TeachingRemedial teaching has been given to identify students by subject teachers and expertswith the help of text books, project work, peer group learning and TLM. The activity conductedatleast 50 teaching hours per subject with in the school time.


( 126 )

8. Post AssessmentIn the Post Assessment same procedure like baseline assessment has been adopted.9. Remedial Teaching for NA+PA Children in Post AssessmentThe result of Post Assessment has been analyzed and the students who got PA and NA inthe Post Assessment have been given remedial teaching with special attention in regular classroom.

Subject-wise % of Achievement in Pre & Post Assessment for year 2016-17

District NameHindi English Maths Science

Pre(%)

Post(%)

Pre(%)

Post(%)

Pre(%)

Post(%)

Pre(%)

Post(%)ALMORA 49.89 70.72 39.58 60.92 30.12 53.14 35.99 55.45BAGESHWAR 54.57 75.30 43.74 63.65 31.28 59.30 39.35 63.28CHAMOLI 52.20 58.53 43.44 57.80 33.52 47.89 42.86 56.05CHAMPAWAT 45.81 69.66 30.18 46.53 25.05 37.36 29.56 50.90DEHRADUN 41.73 62.21 21.89 43.10 17.61 34.05 30.21 46.21HARIDWAR 49.54 64.28 40.21 53.96 28.26 44.72 47.68 64.74NAINITAL 57.49 76.08 41.35 57.97 31.92 53.56 47.15 58.97PAURI 48.30 69.15 36.78 55.49 26.78 50.75 38.96 57.49PITHORAGARH 41.71 66.40 28.27 53.18 22.38 47.13 30.38 50.36RUDRAPRAYAG 52.17 78.44 36.36 62.29 29.96 62.40 43.24 68.27TEHRI 54.84 71.42 33.79 60.13 26.88 56.02 34.27 61.53U.S. NAGAR 39.92 67.00 27.39 46.48 20.40 43.59 26.41 45.52UTTARKASHI 45.91 67.48 23.96 43.50 23.44 41.94 33.26 45.87

State 48.77 68.98 34.38 54.23 26.74 48.61 36.87 55.74


( 127 )

Action Plan (State Level Activities)

Step Activity Schedule

Rest AcademicSessionMay(3rd Week)

Apr. (2nd Week) toMay. (2nd Week)

Step-9 Remedial Teaching for NA+PA Childrenin Post AssessmentPost AssessmentStep-8

Remedial TeachingStep-7

Apr.(1st Week)Mapping of Learning Gaps andRemedial AreasStep-6

Apr.(1st Week)Identification of Learning Gaps(Base Line - Test)Step-5

Training (KRP, MT,Teachers/Principal/BEO)Feb.(4th Week)Development of Tools (CompetencyBased Assessment Tools)Mar.(2nd Week)Step-4

Step-3

Feb.(2nd Week)Mapping of Subject-wise Competenciesfor Class VIII and IXStep-2

Step-1 Feb.(1st Week)SRG Meeting (Discussion on Govt. G.O.and route map for Programme


( 128 )

Proposal of Assessment Tools 2017-18

S.No.

Name of theDistricts

Assessment Tools & Printing Model Test

GrandTotal

No. ofStudents

(Govt.and

Aided)

UnitCost(in

lakh)

TotalAmount

(inlakh)

No. ofSchools(Govt.

andAided)

UnitCost(in

lakh)

TotalAmount

(inlakh)1 Almora 11061 0.002 22.122 301 0.001 0.301 22.4232 Bageshwar 4106 0.002 8.212 106 0.001 0.106 8.3183 Chamoli 6391 0.002 12.782 223 0.001 0.223 13.0054 Champawat 4395 0.002 8.790 114 0.001 0.114 8.9045 Dehradun 12985 0.002 25.970 225 0.001 0.225 26.1956 Haridwar 15240 0.002 30.480 145 0.001 0.145 30.6257 Nainital 12063 0.002 24.126 223 0.001 0.223 24.3498 Pauri 10027 0.002 20.054 378 0.001 0.378 20.4329 Pithoragarh 6991 0.002 13.982 220 0.001 0.220 14.20210 Rudraprayag 4637 0.002 9.274 137 0.001 0.137 9.41111 Tehri 10330 0.002 20.660 301 0.001 0.301 20.96112 U.S. Nagar 17219 0.002 34.438 155 0.001 0.155 34.59313 Uttarkashi 4872 0.002 9.744 128 0.001 0.128 9.872

Total 120317 240.634 2656 2.656 243.290Workshop (@ Rs. 0.50 lakhsper District) - - - - 6.500

Grand Total 120317 240.634 2656 2.656 249.790

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 249.790 lakh would be required for pre and post tools of all students.8.17 Project on English

UNNATIThe Govt. of India has sanctioned an innovative programme ''UNNATI'' focused ondeveloping competencies of spoken English and Soft Skill for 98188 students of class IX and Xstudying in 1115 Govt. Secondary and Senior Secondary Schools in 2016-17. The State Govt.has launched the programme with the help of expert agency IL&FS Education that is selectedthrough national bid and it is providing study material, multimedia C.D. and facilitators for theprogramme. The agency has selected facilitators after the scrutiny and deputed them at schoollevel.The salient features of the third party evaluation report:

As per the result of base line survey remarkable achievement have been noticed in softskill and confidence of the student. Statistics displayed that the UNNATI programme have been welcome by the stakeholders. The community, teachers, principals, guardians and students are optimistic for thecontinuation of UNNATI programme. More such programme should be introduced. So the UNNATI programme is being proposed for the students of class IX and X studyingin 2244 Govt. Secondary and Senior Secondary Schools.

Aims and Objectives1. Eliminate hesitation in speaking English through step by step learning of functionedEnglish.2. Teach the basic, intermediate and advanced professional skills essential for getting ajob, communication, presentation, ethics etiquettes, awareness etc.


( 129 )

Target GroupStudents of class 9th and 10th studying in Secondary and Senior Secondary schools.Activity Carried Out in 2014-15 & 2016-171. Pre assessment has been conducted before start the A1 course2. 90 hours or 90 days course was conducted in 731 schools for the year 2014-15 and 90hours or 60 days course is in progress for the year 2016-17.3. After completion of course post assessment was conducted by the working agency.StrategyThe working agency will provide study material, multimedia C.D. and facilitators foryear 2017-18 as per the norms of MOU will be signed between "Sabhi ke liye MadhyamikShiksha Parishad Uttarakhand" and working agency.1. The facilitator will be graduate and fluent in English speaking.2. Agency will conduct base line survey in selected schools.3. Agency will complete 90 hours A1 & A2 level spoken English Course in 2254 schools(1139+1115) for students of class IX and class X according Common EuropeanFramework of Reference (CEFR).4. Agency will also ensures that the capacity of school teachers and principals getsubstantially enhanced during the process.Duration and level of moduleThe programme will be implemented in following frame work:

S.No.

Levels ofmodule Duration Intervention

1. A1 90 hours (1-2 hour everyday for a period of 3 months)For Individuals who do not know the EnglishLanguage at all. The course aims at introducingthem to English words and vocabulary. Thecontent revolves around basic things, animals andpeople around.The programme will run from September 2017 to November 2017 for year 2017-18.

Budget requirementS.No. Activity Physical Unit cost

(In Lakh)Total Cost(In Lakh)1 Facilitator 2253 0.4500 1013.850002 Study Material 184231 0.0025 460.577503 Monitoring and Evaluation and Assessment 2253 0.0050 11.26500

Total 1485.69250

Proposal of Honorarium of Instructor 2017-18 (for 3 months)S.N. District No. of Schools Unit Cost (in lakh) Total Cost (in lakh)1 Almora 261 0.45 117.452 Bageshwar 90 0.45 40.503 Chamoli 200 0.45 90.004 Champawat 105 0.45 47.255 Dehradun 165 0.45 74.256 Haridwar 89 0.45 40.057 Nainital 188 0.45 84.608 Pauri 303 0.45 136.359 Pithoragarh 208 0.45 93.6010 Rudraprayag 109 0.45 49.0511 Tehri 287 0.45 129.1512 US Nagar 123 0.45 55.3513 Uttarkashi 125 0.45 56.25

Total 2253 1013.85


( 130 )

Proposal of Learning Materials 2017-18S.N. District No. of

SchoolsPhysical

(No. of Children)Unit Cost(in lakh)

Total Cost(in lakh)1 Almora 261 19488 0.00250 48.720002 Bageshwar 90 7305 0.00250 18.262503 Chamoli 200 12642 0.00250 31.605004 Champawat 105 7748 0.00250 19.370005 Dehradun 165 15703 0.00250 39.257506 Haridwar 89 10929 0.00250 27.322507 Nainital 188 17460 0.00250 43.650008 Pauri 303 16271 0.00250 40.677509 Pithoragarh 208 13586 0.00250 33.9650010 Rudraprayag 109 8382 0.00250 20.9550011 Tehri 287 20720 0.00250 51.8000012 US Nagar 123 23606 0.00250 59.0150013 Uttarkashi 125 10391 0.00250 25.97750

Total 2253 184231 460.5775

Proposal of Monitoring Evaluation & Assessment 2017-18S.N. District No. of Schools Unit Cost (in lakh) Total Cost (in lakh)1 Almora 261 0.005 1.305002 Bageshwar 90 0.005 0.450003 Chamoli 200 0.005 1.000004 Champawat 105 0.005 0.525005 Dehradun 165 0.005 0.825006 Haridwar 89 0.005 0.445007 Nainital 188 0.005 0.940008 Pauri 303 0.005 1.515009 Pithoragarh 208 0.00500 1.0400010 Rudraprayag 109 0.005 0.5450011 Tehri 287 0.005 1.4350012 US Nagar 123 0.005 0.6150013 Uttarkashi 125 0.005 0.62500

Total 2253 11.26500

8.18 Student wise Data base Management Information System (SDMIS) in sync withU-DISENUEPA has initiated the child wise information collection of every student studying inclass 1-12 in all management schools. Data collection of every student in 35 points is to becollected in DCF format and all the data is to be uploaded online/offline mode in nationalserver.

Proposal for SDMIS for 2017-18S.No. Name of the

DistrictsNo. of

SchoolsNo. of

StudentsUnit Cost(in lakh)

Total Amount(in lakh)1 Almora 339 49905 0.00001 0.499052 Bageshwar 122 20615 0.00001 0.206153 Chamoli 257 31615 0.00001 0.316154 Champawat 141 19782 0.00001 0.197825 Dehradun 475 123226 0.00001 1.232266 Haridwar 263 92641 0.00001 0.926417 Nainital 309 64059 0.00001 0.640598 Pauri 429 54692 0.00001 0.546929 Pithoragarh 266 37492 0.00001 0.37492


( 131 )


No. ofSchools

No. ofStudents

Unit Cost(in lakh)

Total Amount(in lakh)10 Rudraprayag 148 20065 0.00001 0.2006511 Tehri 337 48712 0.00001 0.4871212 U.S. Nagar 349 107755 0.00001 1.0775513 Uttarkashi 158 25789 0.00001 0.25789

Total 3593 696348 6.96348

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 6.96348 lakh would be required for pre and post tools of all students.8.19 National Programme on School Standards and Evaluation- NPSSE (Shaala Siddhi)National Programme on School Standards and Evaluation- NPSSE (Shaala Siddhi) waslaunched by hon’ble minister for Human Resource Development on 7th November 2015. ShaalaSiddhi a comprehensive instrument for school evaluation leading to School improvement hasbeen developed by the NUEPA.It enables school to evaluate their performance in a more focused manner and facilitatesthem to make professional judgment for continues improvement. Shaala siddhi is implement inall 2250 Govt. Secondary and Senior Secondary Schools in State from 2016-17 and amount ofRs. 35.05 Lac is proposed to all Districts at Rs. 10 per child enrolled in all Govt. School.GOI has informed that part of the funds approval under MMER head of RMSA may beutilize to meet the cost of implementation of shaala siddhi in 2016-17. One day out of 16 daysSLDP Training of Head Masters and one session out of 3 days Training ofDEOs/Principals/Administrators is also earmarked for Shaala Siddhi Programme.

Proposal for Shaala Siddhi for the year 2017-18S.No. District No. of Govt. &

Aided SchoolsChild

Enrollment Unit Cost Amount in Lacs.1 Almora 301 43197 0.00010 4.319702 Bageshwar 106 16556 0.00010 1.655603 Chamoli 223 26584 0.00010 2.658404 Champawat 114 15428 0.00010 1.542805 Dehradun 225 46548 0.00010 4.654806 Haridwar 145 49837 0.00010 4.983707 Nainital 223 42892 0.00010 4.289208 Pauri 378 41032 0.00010 4.103209 Pithoragarh 220 26837 0.00010 2.6837010 Rudraprayag 137 18469 0.00010 1.8469011 Tehri 301 42363 0.00010 4.2363012 U.S. Nagar 155 55674 0.00010 5.5674013 Uttarkashi 128 20135 0.00010 2.01350Total 2656 445552 44.5552

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs 44.5552 lakh would be required for pre and post tools of all students.8.20 ICT (Recurring Components) Proposal 2017-18S.No. Component Unit Cost Phy. Financial1. Computer, Stationery (Printer, Cartridges, CD-ROMs, DVD,

paper etc.)0.80000 500 400.00000

2. Electricity Charges 0.12000 500 60.000003. Expenses on Diesel/Kerosene for Generator 0.12000 500 60.000004. Internet / Broad band Charges 0.10000 500 50.000005. Telephone Charges 0.06000 500 30.00000

Total 600.00000

Chapter - 9 : Vocationalisation

( 132 )

Chapter - 9Vocationalisation

The Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Vocationalisation of Secondary Education providesfor diversification of educational opportunities so as to enhance individual employability,reduce the mismatch between demand and supply of skilled manpower and provides analternative for those pursuing higher education.The Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Vocationalisation of Secondary Education at + 2level is being implemented since 1988. The revised scheme is in operation since 1992-93. TheScheme provides for financial assistance to the States to set up administrative structure, areavocational surveys, preparation of curriculum, text book, work book curriculum guides,training manual, teacher training programme, strengthening technical support system forresearch and development, training and evaluation etc. It also provides financial assistance toNGOs and voluntary organizations towards implementation of specific innovative projects forconducting short-term courses.Institutions to be coveredThe institutions having good enrollment in Class IX have been proposed in the firstphase. The subject/Trade of Automobile has been proposed after mapping with thepolytechnics & I.T.Is. In some places there is great demand of skill manpower in auto sectordue to increase of vehicles and transport in the hill state. State Industrial DevelopmentCorporation of Uttarakhand Limited (SIDCUL) is established and developed industrial areas inUS Nagar, Haridwar and Dehradun districts. Many industries are established in the field ofAutomobile, IT, Pharmaceutical etc. in these districts.The subject/trade Tourism has been proposed due to high demand of tourist guide inUttarakhand. H.N.B. Garhwal University (Central University) is running Graduate & PostGraduate course in Tourism. Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam (GMVN) & Kumaun Mandal VikasNigam (KMVN) which are semi Government organization of Uttarakhand are recruiting touristguides.Criteria for Selection of tradeNational Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) has conducted skill gap analysis surveyfor Uttarakhand State. Which shows the results follows:

District mapping of high youth aspiration


( 133 )

Estimated incremental manpower demand 2012-22The above data shows that Tourism, Hospitality, Manufacturing, Construction,Automobile, IT Enable Services, Food Processing & Warehousing are highly demanding tradesin Uttarakhand. Tourism, Hospitality and trade have been more incremental manpowerdemand in Uttarakhand.Proposed SectorsAs per NSDC survey and local needs for employable vocational trades following 06subjects are proposed in district level plan.1. Automobile2. Retail3. IT/ITeS4. Tourism5. Health Care6. Beauty and WellnessNational Occupation Standard Curriculum and Course Material are already prepared byMHRD and PSS Central Institute of Vocational Education (PSSCIVE), Bhopal for Automobile,Retail, Security and IT. These sectors are going on in Haryana, so Uttarakhand adopt somecurriculum and material for these 06 sectors. The curriculum and subject material will bedeveloped by state and submit to MHRD for vetting.It has been proposed to course the 02 sectors by each school as per local need. Therecourses from class IX shall be introduced as optional subject in selected schools in the state.The students having enrolled in class IX would opt for any one of the subject.Selection of Schools1. Adequate infrastructure.2. Sufficient number of students enrolled in class IX. At least 25 students will be enrolledin one sector.3. Nearby industry.4. Demand for vocational education.


( 134 )

Continuous comprehensive EvaluationContinuous & comprehensive evaluation is a developmental process of students whichemphases on to fold objectives. These objectives are continuity in evaluation and assessmentbroad based learning and behavioral outcomes on the others. This process would create anenvironment for teaching & learning on day to day basis. Lessen mental pressure on studentsand reduce cramming.Provision of InfrastructureThe selected schools are large schools having adequate no. of classrooms and ICT Labs.Availability of ICT Labs shall enable the transaction ICT skill courses. The existing classroomsand offices will utilized for these vocational subjects. However two workshop/ Laboratoryhave been asked for in the projects for the smooth conduct of practical.Implementation PartnersTo begin this project the sate Govt. will be recommend for implementation partnerfollowing the Haryana model of NVEQF. However Industrial linkages will be established withthe Technical Education Department as well as skill knowledge providers in the state. The StateGovernment had taken decision to take the help of Wadhwani Foundation in implementation ofVocational Education.Provision of Faculty & TrainingOne regular vocational coordinator/Principal and four vocational teachers on contractbasis for two subjects for each school would be deployed. Care would be taken to identifyfaculty with proper certification and experience.The faculty shall be provided seven days In-service training and thirty days inductiontraining with the help of National Skill Development Council (NSDC), PSSCIVE and SCERT.Involvement of IndustriesAs the ultimate consumer of the output of education and training system, industries hasto pay a pro active role in skill development initiatives and to sport the action taken by otherstake holders in accordance with the current market needs. Keeping in view the above theprovision of industries coordinator in each subject/ trade has been made on regular basis.CertificationThe certification will be done by Uttarakhand Vidyalayee Shiksha Parisad, Ramnagar.Activities carried out under Vocational Education 200 Schools are selected in all 13 districts. Labs space identified in selected schools. SRG for vocational education constituted at state level. MOU signed with Wadhwani Foundation for providing technical assistance inimplementation of vocational education programme. MOU signed with NSDC for student's assessment & certification purpose. Awareness programmes for students/teachers/principals and SMDC's members areorganised at school level. Meeting with Uttarakhand Vidyalayee Shiksha Parishad, Ramnagar (ExaminationBoard) was organised for students assessment and certification in co-ordination withNSDC and Wadhwani Foundation. A NSQF CEll at Uttarakhand Vidyalayee Shiksha Parishad, Ramnagar has beenestablished. Uttarakhand Vidyalayee Shiksha Parishad, Ramnagar has integrated vocationaleducation subjects as a main core subjects at secondary and higher secondary level. State adopted PSSCIVE designed curriculum and reference materials.


( 135 )

Books are printing in Hindi and English languages through SCERT. EOI floated for selection of Vocational Training Partners (VTP's)/agencies forimplementation of vocational education in schools. On the basis of EOI, RFP has designed and published to select the agencies forimplementation of vocational education. e-Tender were invited in 03 times for selection of implementing firm, but in previous 02bids due to insufficient number of tenders received, the bid has been not accepted. In 3rdtime single bid has received for 03 trades and 02 bids received for 01 trade (HealthCare). The executive committee has decided after the review of previous 02 e-Tenders, that ifin the 3rd time only 01 bid which fulfill the necessary norms will be considered. In caseno bid will received in 3rd time or no bidder will qualified then SIS RMSA will invite theempanelled Vocational Training Partners (VTPs) of National Skill DevelopmentCorporation (NSDC) and select the trade-wise VTP for programme. The executive committee has directed to SIS will execute the programme definitely fromApril, 2017. The list of equipment suggested by the PSSCIVE has been considered by StateGovernment and decides that need based list of equipment will be finalized by StateResource Group with help of NSDC & Wadhwani Foundation and procurement processwill be taken by SMDC/SMC as per RMSA Financial & Procurement Manual. The list oftrade-wise equipment is finalized by SRG.

Responsibilities of VTPsThe service provider will be responsible for the following in the proposed programmecovering 200 secondary and senior secondary schools. The service provider shall:a) Ensure arrangement of maintenance of tools and equipments, software and e-learningmaterial as and when required.b) Ensure day-to-day requirements of stationary and other consumables for conductingthe classes.c) Provide resource persons including teachers/skill trainers, skill knowledge providers,industry coordinators, guest faculty as per requirement of the project.d) Provide 02 vocational teachers in selected school of plain and hilly area as per the trade.Initial requirement Year 1-Year 3 shall be of 01 teacher for class 9-10. If class XI-XII areadded to the program additional 1 teacher shall be deployed by the service provider.e) Ensure hands on skill training to students in industrial and commercial establishments.f) Ensure internal assessment of the students.g) Ensure theoretical and practical classes as per NSQF guidelines.h) Ensure students, parents, teachers and community mobilization in selected schools.i) Create awareness among the students, parents, teachers and community for thevocational education.j) Provide guidance and counselling services to the students as and when required.k) Ensure industry visit to the student for their improvement in practical exposure.l) Provide placement to the eligible students in related job market after passing out thelevel IV certificate.m) Organize minimum 20 guest faculty lecture in each relating subject/trade in everyselected schools.Another Activities Planned for Academic year 2017-181. Separate NSQF Cell at State for Vocational Education under SPO;2. Principal Training for selected schools;3. Online Portal for reporting management for Vocational Education Programme – Supportby NIC;4. Agreement with VTPs;


( 136 )

5. Selection & recruitment of VTPs/Implementation Partners;6. Selection & recruitment of vocational teachers will be followed on the basis of PSSCIVEeducational qualification norms.7. Training of vocational teachers by trade-wise;8. Lab setup at school level;9. Project rollout in April, 2017.Year-wise Sanctioned No. of Vocational School

S.No. Districts 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Total1 Almora 0 01 02 11 142 Bageshwer 0 01 02 04 073 Chamoli 0 02 02 10 144 Champawat 0 01 01 08 105 Dehradun 04 06 02 08 206 Haridwar 03 03 01 06 137 Nainital 0 08 02 11 218 Pauri 0 02 04 15 219 Pithoragarh 0 01 05 10 1610 Rudraparyag 0 01 02 03 0611 Tehri 0 01 04 14 1912 U.S. Nagar 04 05 08 09 2613 Uttarkashi 0 01 01 11 13Total 11 33 36 120 200

List of Year-wise Sanctioned Schools for Vocational Education

Year 2013-14S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-21 DEHRADUN G.I.C HARBERTPUR 5050308501 IT Automobile2 DEHRADUN G.I.C SELAKUI 5050400405 IT Automobile3 DEHRADUN G.I.C BSN GUJRARA 5050501203 IT Automobile4 DEHRADUN G.G.I.C RAJPUR ROAD 5050530546 IT Automobile5 HARIDWAR G.G.I.C. JAWALAPUR 5130114913 IT Automobile6 HARIDWAR G.I.C. BHEL 5130110407 IT Automobile7 HARIDWAR G.I.C. ROORKEE 5130814101 IT Automobile8 U.S. NAGAR GIC,SITARGANJ 5120609219 IT Automobile9 U.S. NAGAR GIC AN JHA RUDRAPUR 5120201749 IT Automobile10 U.S. NAGAR GGIC,PANTNAGAR 5120209901 IT Automobile11 U.S. NAGAR GIC MAHUVAKHEDAGANJ 5120503606 IT Automobile

Year 2014-15S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-21 ALMORA G.I.C. LODHIYA 5090604902 IT Automobile2 BAGESHWAR V.M.J.S.G I.C. BAGESHWAR 5080100104 IT Automobile3 CHAMOLI GIC GOPESHWAR 5020203304 IT Automobile4 CHAMOLI GGIC JOSHIMATH 5020108003 IT Patient Care5 CHAMPAWAT GIC LOHAGHAT 5100209204 IT Automobile6 DEHRADUN GIC LAKHAMANDAL 5050108602 IT Automobile7 DEHRADUN G. I. C SAHIYA 5050217303 IT Automobile8 DEHRADUN G.I.C SABHAWALA 5050306710 IT Automobile9 DEHRADUN G.I.C MUSSORIEE 5050432801 IT Patient Care10 DEHRADUN G.I.C MALDEVTA 5050507702 Retail Patient Care11 DEHRADUN G.G.I.C RISHIKESH 5050633206 Retail Patient Care12 HARIDWAR G.I.C. IMLIKHERA 5130801406 IT Patient Care13 HARIDWAR G.I.C. SALEMPUR 5130103006 IT Retail14 HARIDWAR G.I.C. BHOGPUR 5130511202 IT Automobile15 NAINITAL GIC LAL KUAN 5110403507 Retail Automobile


( 137 )

S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-216 NAINITAL GGIC NAINITAL 5110300246 IT Patient Care17 NAINITAL GIC SUNDARKHAL 5110705401 IT Automobile18 NAINITAL GIC BETALGHAT 5110805205 IT Automobile19 NAINITAL GGIC KOTABAGH 5110504504 IT Patient Care20 NAINITAL GIC OKHALKANDA 5110614203 IT Automobile21 NAINITAL GIC RAMGARH 5110213602 IT Automobile22 NAINITAL GGIC RAMNAGAR 5110110204 Retail Patient Care23 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE KOTDWAR 5060814803 IT Automobile24 PAURI GOVT. GIRLS INTER COLLEGESRINAGAR 5060202111 IT Patient Care25 PITHORAGARH GIC PITTORAGARH 5070104504 IT Automobile26 RUDRAPRAYAG G.I.C.RUDRAPRAYAG 5030122106 IT Automobile27 TEHRI GIC TAPOVAN 5040707604 IT Automobile28 U.S. NAGAR GHS SISAUNA 5120602107 IT Automobile29 U.S. NAGAR GHS BASAI 5120309401 IT Retail30 U.S. NAGAR GHS CHARUVETA 5120403302 IT Patient Care31 U.S. NAGAR GIC SULTANPURPATTI 5120707208 IT Patient Care32 U.S. NAGAR GICJAINAGAR 5120105302 Retail Automobile33 UTTARKASHI GIC UTTARKASHI 5010109226 IT AutomobileYear 2015-16

S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-21 ALMORA G.I.C. BARAKUNA 5090513302 Tourism Beauty &Wellness2 ALMORA G.I.C. DWARAHAT 5090400701 IT Tourism3 BAGESHWAR G.G I C BAGESHWAR 5080100404 Beauty &Wellness IT4 BAGESHWAR G I C KAUSANI 5080309703 Beauty &Wellness Tourism5 CHAMOLI GIC GADORA 5020209202 Tourism Patient Care6 CHAMOLI G.G.I.C. GOUCHAR 5020413913 IT Patient Care7 CHAMPAWAT GGIC CHAMPAWAT 5100305001 Tourism Patient Care8 DEHRADUN GOVT INTER COLLEGE MEHUWALA 5050500110 Patient Care Automobile9 DEHRADUN GOVT. INTER COLLEGE I.D.P.L. 5050619903 Tourism Patient Care10 HARIDWAR GIC LALDHANG 5130108404 IT Tourism11 NAINITAL GGIC DHOLAKHERA 5110402402 Beauty &Wellness Tourism12 NAINITAL GIC LAMACHAUR 5110401701 Beauty &Wellness Tourism13 PAURI GGIC PAURI 5060108104 Beauty &Wellness Tourism14 PAURI GGIC KOTDWAR 5060814802 Beauty &Wellness Tourism15 PAURI GGIC GHAMANDPUR 5060810407 Beauty &Wellness Tourism16 PAURI GGIC LANSDOWN 5061201805 Beauty &Wellness Tourism17 PITHORAGARH SDS GIC PITHORAGARH 5070125106 Tourism Patient Care18 PITHORAGARH GGIC DIDIHAT 5070402605 Beauty &Wellness Patient Care19 PITHORAGARH GGIC DHARCHULA 5070513824 Tourism Patient Care20 PITHORAGARH G.I.C. MUNSYARI 5070604901 Tourism Patient Care21 PITHORAGARH MAHAKALI GIC GANGOLIHAT 5070803004 Tourism Patient Care22 RUDRAPRYAG GIC RAMASRAM 5030201202 Tourism Automobile23 RUDRAPRYAG GIC UKHIMATH 5030301603 Tourism Automobile24 TEHRI GIC CHAMBA 5040223009 IT Automobile25 TEHRI GIC DUADHAR 5040725502 Beauty &Wellness IT26 TEHRI GIC KEMPTY 5040523203 Tourism Beauty &Wellness


( 138 )

S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-227 TEHRI GIC HINDOLAKHAL 5040326202 Tourism Beauty &Wellness28 U.S. NAGAR GGIC KHATIMA 5120404118 Patient Care IT29 U.S. NAGAR GGIC SITARGANJ 5120609220 Patient Care IT30 U.S. NAGAR GIC SHAKTIFORM 5120604312 Automobile IT31 U.S. NAGAR GIC FOUJI MATKOTA 5120201767 Automobile IT32 U.S. NAGAR GGIC GADARPUR 5120107424 Patient Care Beauty &Wellness33 U.S. NAGAR GGIC BAZPUR 5120707328 Patient Care Beauty &Wellness34 U.S. NAGAR GGIC KASHIPUR 5120505172 Patient Care Retail35 U.S. NAGAR GGIC JASPUR 5120307924 Patient Care Beauty &Wellness36 UTTARKASHI GIC BARKOT 5010518411 IT AutomobileYear 2016-17

S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-21 ALMORA G.I.C. ALMORA 5090614701 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS2 ALMORA G.I.C. DEWLALIKHET 5091112402 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS3 ALMORA G.G.I.C. RANIKHET 5091103902 Travel &Tourism Beauty &Wellness4 ALMORA G.I.C. BHANAULI 5090503903 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS5 ALMORA G.I.C. CHAUKHUTIYA 5090300404 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS6 ALMORA G.I.C. HAWALBHAG 5090602004 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS7 ALMORA G.I.C. NAUGAON REETHAGADH 5090100902 Travel &Tourism Healthcare8 ALMORA G.I.C. JAURASI 5090905103 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS9 ALMORA G.I.C. CHAMTOLA 5090506502 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS10 ALMORA G.I.C. MAALIKHET 5090901903 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS11 ALMORA G.I.C. BAGWALIPOKHAR 5090406202 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS12 BAGESHWAR G I C GARUR 5080303202 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism13 BAGESHWAR G I C KANDA 5080107902 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism14 BAGESHWAR G I CKAPKOT 5080202707 Healthcare Travel &Tourism15 BAGESHWAR G I C KARMI 5080204201 Healthcare Travel &Tourism16 CHAMOLI GIC NANDPRYAG 5020213201 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS17 CHAMOLI GIC RADUA CHANDNIKHAL 5020507003 IT / ITeS Healthcare18 CHAMOLI GIC BANJBAGAR 5020300103 IT / ITeS Healthcare19 CHAMOLI GIC MUNDOLI 5020902003 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS20 CHAMOLI GIC BAIRASKUND 5020302303 IT / ITeS Healthcare21 CHAMOLI GIC MAEHALCHOURI 5020607303 IT / ITeS Healthcare22 CHAMOLI GIC TAPOVAN 5020101703 Travel &Tourism Healthcare23 CHAMOLI GIC AADIBADRI 5020617801 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS24 CHAMOLI GIC KARANPRAYAG 5020400804 Healthcare IT / ITeS25 CHAMOLI GIC GWALDAM 5020808006 Travel & Healthcare


( 139 )

S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-2Tourism26 CHAMPAWAT GGIC TANAKPUR 5100309403 Travel &Tourism Beauty &Wellness27 CHAMPAWAT GGIC LOHAGHAT 5100210501 Travel &Tourism Healthcare28 CHAMPAWAT GIC CHAMPAWAT 5100304701 Travel &Tourism Beauty &Wellness29 CHAMPAWAT GIC PATI 5100404202 Travel &Tourism Healthcare30 CHAMPAWAT GIC CHOUMAIL 5100102203 Travel &Tourism Healthcare31 CHAMPAWAT GIC PULHINDOLA 5100209001 Travel &Tourism Healthcare32 CHAMPAWAT GGIC KHETIKHAN 5100402303 Travel &Tourism Healthcare33 CHAMPAWAT GIC BARAKOT 5100108102 Travel &Tourism Healthcare34 DEHRADUN GOVT. INTER COLLEGEDAKPATTHAR 5050301102 Healthcare Travel &Tourism35 DEHRADUN GOVT INTER COLLEGE TUINI 5050124702 Healthcare Travel &Tourism36 DEHRADUN GOVT. INTER COLLEGE BARONWALAJOLLY 5050605617 Healthcare Retail37 DEHRADUN GOVT. INTER COLLEGE KALSI 5050201208 Healthcare Travel &Tourism38 DEHRADUN GOVT INTER COLLEGE QWANSI 5050106003 Healthcare Travel &Tourism39 DEHRADUN GOVT INTER COLLEGE KISHANPUR 5050520801 Beauty &Wellness Retail40 DEHRADUN GOVT. INTER COLLEGE NAAGTHAT 5050211102 Healthcare Travel &Tourism41 DEHRADUN GOVT. GIRLS INTER COLLEGEKAULAGARH 5050420907 Healthcare Retail42 HARIDWAR G.I.C. NIRANJANPUR 5130508502 Retail Travel &Tourism43 HARIDWAR G.I.C. MUNDAKHERHA KALA 5130506406 IT / ITeS Healthcare44 HARIDWAR G.I.C. BOYS SIKRAUDA 5130201208 Healthcare Beauty &Wellness45 HARIDWAR G.GI.C. JHABRERA 5130716701 Retail Beauty &Wellness46 HARIDWAR G.I.C. PODOWALI KHANPUR 5130403003 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism47 HARIDWAR G.I.C. KUNJA BAHADURPUR 5130206906 IT / ITeS Healthcare48 NAINITAL GIC KOTABAGH 5110504503 IT / ITeS Healthcare49 NAINITAL GIC DOULATPUR 5110410501 IT / ITeS Healthcare50 NAINITAL GIC DHANACULI 5110705002 Healthcare Travel &Tourism51 NAINITAL GIC PIUDA 5110211801 IT / ITeS Healthcare52 NAINITAL GIC KHEIRNA 5110802702 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism53 NAINITAL GIC PATKOT 5110101203 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism54 NAINITAL GIC DONPAREWA 5110502101 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism55 NAINITAL GIC PATLOT 5110609602 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism56 NAINITAL GIC KARANPUR 5110109103 Healthcare Beauty &Wellness57 NAINITAL GIC PATUADANGAR 5110311602 Beauty &Wellness Travel &Tourism58 NAINITAL GIC NAI 5110603002 Healthcare Travel &


( 140 )

S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-2Tourism59 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE THALISAIN 5061416501 Travel &Tourism Healthcare60 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE CHAKISAIN 5061409002 Travel &Tourism Healthcare61 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGELAXMANJHOOLA 5060908601 Travel &Tourism Retail62 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE BHIRGUKHAL 5060904402 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS63 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGESAKANKARSAIN 5060304902 Travel &Tourism Healthcare64 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE SRINAGAR 5060202110 Healthcare Retail65 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE SATPULI 5061503501 Retail Healthcare66 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGENAUGAONKHAL 5060602603 Travel &Tourism Healthcare67 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE BILKHET 5060504202 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS68 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE DUGADDA 5060814003 Healthcare Retail69 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE DEVPRAYAG 5060407502 Travel &Tourism Healthcare70 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE PAURI 5060109901 Healthcare IT / ITeS71 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE KOT 5060400601 Travel &Tourism Healthcare72 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE SIDHKHAL 5061002102 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS73 PAURI GOVT. INTER COLLEGE VEDIKHAL 5061112503 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS74 PITHORAGARH GANGOTRI GARBYAL GGICPITHORAGARH 5070113901 Beauty &Wellness Healthcare75 PITHORAGARH GIC MUWANI 5070311105 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS76 PITHORAGARH GIC BARAM 5070506602 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS77 PITHORAGARH GGIC BERINAG 5070705402 Beauty &Wellness Healthcare78 PITHORAGARH GIC PANKHU 5070708902 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS79 PITHORAGARH GOVT I C. MADKOT 5070602903 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS80 PITHORAGARH GIC DHARCHULA 5070513820 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS81 PITHORAGARH G.I.C. DOR 5070600204 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS82 PITHORAGARH GIC BANKOT 5070804904 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS83 PITHORAGARH GIC DIDIHAT 5070403002 Travel &Tourism IT / ITeS84 RUDRAPRYAG GIC GUPTKASHI 5030309603 Travel &Tourism Retail85 RUDRAPRYAG GIC SIDHSOUR 5030209401 Travel &Tourism Healthcare86 RUDRAPRYAG GIC AUGUSTYAMUNI 5030100109 Travel &Tourism Healthcare87 TEHRI GIC ANJANISAIN 5040407104 Beauty &Wellness Travel &Tourism88 TEHRI GIC NAINBAG 5040505402 IT / ITeS Healthcare89 TEHRI GIC PAURIKHAL 5040327501 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism90 TEHRI GIC OKHLAKHAL 5040800303 Beauty &Wellness Travel &Tourism91 TEHRI GIC AKHORI 5040118903 Beauty & IT / ITeS


( 141 )

S.No District Name of Schools U DISE Code Trade-1 Trade-2Wellness92 TEHRI GIC THATYUR 5040510002 Beauty &Wellness Travel &Tourism93 TEHRI GIC KIRTINAGAR 5040617401 Healthcare Travel &Tourism94 TEHRI GIC KAMAND 5040902902 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism95 TEHRI GIC KILKILESHWAR 5040617501 Healthcare Travel &Tourism96 TEHRI GIC JAJAL 5040701003 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism97 TEHRI GIC NAKOT 5040200204 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism98 TEHRI GIC RAJAKHET 5040414802 Beauty &Wellness Travel &Tourism99 TEHRI GIC GHUMETIDHAR 5040111303 IT / ITeS Healthcare100 TEHRI GIC CHHAM 5040904905 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism101 U.S. NAGAR GIC SAKTIFARM 5120610305 IT / ITeS Healthcare102 U.S. NAGAR GIC BARHAINI 5120701212 IT / ITeS Retail103 U.S. NAGAR GIC PRATAPPUR 5120500703 IT / ITeS Retail104 U.S. NAGAR GIC JHANKAT 5120409902 IT / ITeS Healthcare105 U.S. NAGAR GGIC DINESHPUR 5120107510 Beauty &Wellness Healthcare106 U.S. NAGAR GIC BANSHKHERA 5120502303 Retail Healthcare107 U.S. NAGAR GIC GADARPUR 5120107423 IT / ITeS Retail108 U.S. NAGAR GIC MAHUWA DABARA 5120308207 IT / ITeS Healthcare109 U.S. NAGAR GIC SANTIPURI 5120206209 IT / ITeS Healthcare110 UTTARKASHI GIC NAUGAON 5010509704 Healthcare Travel &Tourism111 UTTARKASHI GIC CHINYALI SOUR 5010205211 Healthcare Travel &Tourism112 UTTARKASHI GIC PUROLA 5010603707 Healthcare Travel &Tourism113 UTTARKASHI GIC BANCHAURA 5010203208 IT / ITeS Healthcare114 UTTARKASHI GGIC BARKOT 5010518410 Healthcare Travel &Tourism115 UTTARKASHI GIC MORI 5010410601 Healthcare Travel &Tourism116 UTTARKASHI GIC HUDOLI 5010602204 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism117 UTTARKASHI GIC DHONTRI 5010309807 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism118 UTTARKASHI GIC MANERI 5010104206 IT / ITeS Travel &Tourism119 UTTARKASHI GIC MAATLI 5010300703 Healthcare Travel &Tourism120 UTTARKASHI GIC ARAKOT 5010401603 IT / ITeS Travel &TourismVocational Education Recurring Proposal for 2017-18

S.No. Component Unit Cost Phy. Financial1. Cost of providing Hands on Skill Training to Students (prev.) 0.37500 200 75.000002. Flexible Pool for Engaging Resource Persons (prev.) 7.25000 200 1450.000003. Office Expenses / Contingencies for new school (Prev.) 1.00000 200 200.000004. Raw material grant for new school per course (Prev.) 0.70000 200 140.000005. Induction training of Teachers (prev.) 0.11000 400 44.00000

Total 1909.00000

Chapter - 10 : School Infrastructure and Strengthening of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education

( 142 )

Chapter - 10School Infrastructure and Strengthening of Secondary and Higher

Secondary Education

Access is not only availability of school but also availability of basic minimum facilitiesin the school. Therefore, all the secondary schools in the state will be provided with basicminimum facilities such as minimum required furniture, drinking water, toilet blocks,electricity and a play ground. All the schools will be provided with the facility of ramps,earthquake resistant buildings, etc. according to the requirement of the school and locality.State targeted to provided minimum required physical infrastructure in all secondaryschools i.e. at least one class room for each section, 01 Integrated Laboratory, 01 Library, 01Computer Lab, 01 Art and Craft Room and Toilet block.The unit cost sanctioned for a upgraded secondary school by the GOI in the year 2009-10 to 2011-12 is Rs 46.86 lakhs for 01 sanction school are Rs 58.12 lakhs for 02 section schoolsincluding furniture, which is not sufficient. State govt. proposed the separate unit cost for hillyand plain area, according to state PWD norms. State govt. prepared school specific design andestimates to all upgraded schools separately. The unit cost for each construction work is as perblock level SOR.State Government has nominated Rural Engineering Service Department & IrrigationDepartment, Uttarakhand as construction agency in year 2010-11. State Government has alsonominated State PWD as construction agency in year 2015-16. As per GOI norms SMCs/SMDCsare responsible for construction of civil works up to Rs. 30.00 lakhs. Construction agencyprepared site specific design and estimates after physical verification of each and every civilwork. Local community provide free of cost land for school building. Planning Department isdoing third party evaluation of civil works cost of more than Rs. 1.00 crore & State PWDnominated for third party evaluation of civil works cost of less than Rs. 1.00 crore.State Government has adopted state norms for civil works in previous year and alsoborne additional grant for sanctioned civil works under RMSA. In this year State Governmentadopted GOI norms for all civil works and proposed DSR based costing. State Government hasprepared model estimates for hill & plain areas and calculated the average unit cost for civilworks on the basis of proposed civil works. The average unit cost for civil work as per DSR isfollows:S.

No. Name of Work Total AreaUnit Cost

as per DSR AverageUnit CostHill Plain1 Class Room 1. Room size of 7 X 7 Sq. Mtrs. withadditional 35% for circulation area(20%) and wall area (15%)2. Total Plinth Area of 66 Sq. Mtrs.

21.95 14.80 22.121012 Science LaboratoryRoom 24.68 16.68 24.889683 Computer Room 23.96 16.17 23.005224 Art & Craft Room 21.95 14.80 21.235715 Library Room 1. Room size of 7 X 10.60 Sq. Mtrs.with additional 35% for circulationarea (20%) and wall area (15%).2. Total Plinth Area of 100 Sq. Mtrs. 27.86 18.84 26.54653


( 143 )

The detail of work for strengthening sanctioned in year 2009-10 to 2016-17 arefollowing:Strengthening of School (2009-10)

S.No. District No. of

SchoolClassRoom

ScienceLabs

ComputerRoom

Art & CraftRoom

LibraryRoom

ToiletBlock1 Almora 51 20 10 10 07 11 102 Bageshwar 12 06 03 03 01 03 063 Chamoli 36 0 0 0 0 0 364 Champawat 19 05 04 04 0 0 065 Dehradun 51 16 12 04 0 06 356 Haridwar 06 12 06 0 0 06 067 Nainital 43 20 06 05 08 08 088 Pauri 41 17 15 14 14 14 309 Pithoragarh 38 0 0 0 0 04 3610 Rudraprayag 16 06 03 03 03 02 0311 Tehri 07 14 0 0 0 0 012 U.S. Nagar 45 11 07 07 7 07 2113 Uttarkashi 14 05 06 0 0 05 0

Total 377 132 72 50 40 66 197

Strengthening of School (2010-11)S.

No. District No. ofSchool

ClassRoom

ScienceLabs

ComputerRoom

Art & CraftRoom

LibraryRoom


Total 130 229 67 120 119 110 126



ClassRoom

ScienceLabs

ComputerRoom

Art & CraftRoom

LibraryRoom


Total 32 27 13 20 31 26 04


( 144 )



ClassRoom

ScienceLabs

ComputerRoom

Art & CraftRoom

LibraryRoom


Total 162 183 113 119 155 131 48



ClassRoom

ScienceLabs

ComputerRoom

Art & CraftRoom

LibraryRoom


Total 176 136 94 122 167 162 24State Govt. has proposed strengthening of schools in year 2014-15 on the basis of sitespecific estimates under RMSA, but GOI had not approved site development work for theseproposed schools. In hilly areas it's not possible to construction building without sitedevelopment. Govt. of Uttarakhand again has decided to bear additional cost for sitedevelopment work. Revised site specific detail estimates for these works has been preparedand sent to approval of State Govt. GOI has not released any amount for Non-recurring grant in2014-15. GOI issued a letter no. F.1-5/2014-RMSA-III, dated 7th August, 2015 and directed toSIS that the total pool of non-recurring grants released by this Ministry can be utilized for civilworks pertaining to approvals of any financial year. However priority may be given tocompletion of on-going works. On the basis of total expenditure incurred. Now all sanctionedworks are allotted to construction agencies.Proposal for new civil worksThe state proposed 87 schools for strengthening in 2017-18. District-wise proposal asfollows:

(Rs. in lakhs)S.

No. District ProposedSchools

ClassRoom Library Computer

RoomScience

LabArt &Craft1 ALMORA 05 05 05 04 04 052 BAGESHWAR 05 10 03 04 04 05


( 145 )

S.No. District Proposed

SchoolsClassRoom Library Computer

RoomScience

LabArt &Craft3 CHAMOLI 10 04 10 06 06 104 CHAMPAWAT 06 03 01 05 03 015 DEHRADUN 05 0 05 05 04 056 PAURI 05 01 05 04 05 057 HARIDWAR 05 05 05 05 05 058 NAINITAL 06 03 05 06 04 059 PITHORAGARH 10 11 09 05 06 0710 RUDRAPRAYAG 06 06 06 06 04 0611 TEHRI 09 06 08 09 09 0912 U.S. NAGAR 05 03 05 04 03 0413 UTTARKASHI 10 12 08 06 05 10

TOTAL 87 69 75 69 62 77


( 146 )

List of Proposed Schools for Strengthening(Rs. in lakhs)

S.No. District Block School Code School Hill/

PlainSci.Lab

Comp.Room

ArtRoom

LibraryRoom ACR Civil Work

CostFurniture

CostLab Equip.

CostTotalCost1 ALMORA DHAULADEVI 05090509401 G.I.C. NAINICHAUGARKHA Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.952 ALMORA DHAULADEVI 05090514604 G.I.C. ARASALPAD Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.953 ALMORA SYALDEY 05090902403 G.I.C. CHINTOLI Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.954 ALMORA TAKULA 05091004501 G.I.C. SALAOJ Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.955 ALMORA TARIKHET 05091102102 G.I.C. LODHIYAKHAN Hill 1 1 1 71.76 1.65 73.416 BAGESHWAR BAGESHWAR 05080123201 GOVT HIGH SCHOOL GAIRAD DUG Hill 1 1 1 1 2 142.35 4.55 1.00 147.907 BAGESHWAR BAGESHWAR 05080106101 GOVT HIGH SCHOOL BHETA Hill 1 1 1 1 2 142.35 4.55 1.00 147.908 BAGESHWAR BAGESHWAR 05080112202 G.I.C. MANDALSERA Hill 1 1 1 2 117.67 3.05 120.729 BAGESHWAR GARUR 05080306503 G.I.C. WAJULA Hill 1 1 1 2 114.49 4.30 1.00 119.7910 BAGESHWAR KAPKOTE 05080202707 G.I.C. KAPKOTE Hill 1 1 2 90.53 3.90 1.00 95.4311 CHAMOLI DEWAL 05020903805 GHS WAN Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0012 CHAMOLI JOSHIMATH 05020101302 GHS RAIGADI Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0013 CHAMOLI KARANPRAYAG 05020406303 GHS PUDIYANI Hill 1 1 1 1 2 142.35 4.55 1.00 147.9014 CHAMOLI KARANPRAYAG 05020406901 GIC SILANGI Hill 1 1 1 73.77 1.05 74.8215 CHAMOLI NARAYANBAGAR 05020705902 GIC RAINS CHOPTA Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0016 CHAMOLI POKHARI 05020510102 GIC DEVIKHET Hill 1 1 49.81 0.65 50.4617 CHAMOLI POKHARI 05020507502 GHS SALANA Hill 1 1 1 2 118.39 4.15 1.00 123.5418 CHAMOLI GAIRSAIN 05020600802 GIC BHARADISAIN Hill 1 1 49.81 0.65 50.4619 CHAMOLI GAIRSAIN 05020618302 GIC KANSUWA Hill 1 1 1 73.77 1.05 74.8220 CHAMOLI GAIRSAIN 05020605402 GHS GHANDIYAL Hill 1 1 1 74.49 2.15 1.00 77.6421 CHAMPAWAT Champawat 05100307803 GIC MANCH Hill 1 1 51.82 0.65 52.4722 CHAMPAWAT Champawat 05100312902 G.H.S. PALSON Hill 1 1 1 70.59 2.90 1.00 74.4923 CHAMPAWAT Champawat 05100307502 GHS RAMAILA Hill 1 1 48.64 1.90 1.00 51.5424 CHAMPAWAT Barakot 05100108702 GGIC KAKAD Hill 1 1 48.64 1.90 1.00 51.5425 CHAMPAWAT Barakot 05100102402 GIC MOU Hill 1 1 45.91 1.40 47.3126 CHAMPAWAT Lohaghat 05100204202 GHS KHUNABORA Hill 1 1 43.90 1.40 45.3027 DEHRADUN KALSI 05050214802 GOVT. INTER COLLEGE KUNNA DAGURA Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0028 DEHRADUN VIKASNAGAR 05050301102 GOVT. INTER COLLEGE DAKPATTHAR Plain 1 1 1 1 66.49 2.55 1.00 70.0429 DEHRADUN VIKASNAGAR 05050304107 GOVT HIGH SCHOOL RUDRAPUR Plain 1 1 1 49.81 1.05 50.8630 DEHRADUN SAHASPUR 05050401004 GOVT. HIGH SCHOOL DUNGA Plain 1 1 1 1 66.49 2.55 1.00 70.0431 DEHRADUN RAIPUR 05050506002 GOVT INTER COLLEGE BURANS KHANDA Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0032 HARIDWAR BHAGWANPUR 05130206204 GHSS MOHITPUR Plain 1 1 1 1 1 81.29 3.55 1.00 85.8433 HARIDWAR BHAGWANPUR 05130200504 GGIC BUGGAWALA Plain 1 1 1 1 1 81.29 3.55 1.00 85.8434 HARIDWAR NARASAN 05130808006 GHSS DELNA Plain 1 1 1 1 1 81.29 3.55 1.00 85.8435 HARIDWAR ROORKEE 05130804604 GIC DAULATPUR Plain 1 1 1 1 1 81.29 3.55 1.00 85.8436 HARIDWAR ROORKEE 05130805309 GGIC BHAURI Plain 1 1 1 1 1 81.29 3.55 1.00 85.8437 NAINITAL RAMNAGAR 05110101202 G H S PATKOT Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9538 NAINITAL RAMNAGAR 05110106902 G H S SHIVNATHPUR NAI BASTI Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9539 NAINITAL RAMGARH 05110201601 G.H.S.KOOL Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0040 NAINITAL OKHALKANDA 05110600602 GIC PATRANI Hill 1 23.96 0.40 24.3641 NAINITAL OKHALKANDA 05110609902 G I C DALKANYA Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0042 NAINITAL BETALGHAT 05110804202 G H S TARIKHET Hill 1 1 1 1 95.72 2.05 97.7743 PAURI DWARIKHAL 05061508301 GOVT. INTER COLLEGE DWARIKHAL Hill 1 1 1 74.49 2.15 1.00 77.6444 PAURI JAIHARIKHAL 05061203702 GOVT. INTER COLLEGE SIDHPUR Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.00


( 147 )

S.No. District Block School Code School Hill/

PlainSci.Lab

Comp.Room

ArtRoom

LibraryRoom ACR Civil Work

CostFurniture

CostLab Equip.

CostTotalCostDAUNTHIYAL45 PAURI KOT 05060400601 GOVT. INTER COLLEGE KOT Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0046 PAURI THALISAIN 05061413101 GOVT. INTER COLLEGE MASAUN THALISAIN Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9547 PAURI PAURI 05060106303 GOVT. INTER COLLEGE OJALI Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0048 PITHORAGARH BIN 05070104504 GIC PITTORAGARH Hill 1 1 48.64 1.90 1.00 51.5449 PITHORAGARH BIN 05070125106 SDS GIC PITHORAGARH Hill 1 1 2 93.71 2.65 96.3650 PITHORAGARH KANALICHHEENA 05070307602 G.G.I.C. KANALICHHINA Hill 1 1 1 74.49 2.15 1.00 77.6451 PITHORAGARH DIDIHAT 05070403302 GIC THAL Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9552 PITHORAGARH MUNSYARI 05070608103 G.I.C. NACHANI Hill 1 1 49.81 0.65 50.4653 PITHORAGARH GANGOLIHAT 05070803015 G.G.IC. GANGOLIHAT Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 3.15 1.00 102.6054 PITHORAGARH GANGOLIHAT 05070812503 G.I.C. DASAITHAL Hill 1 1 1 4 164.30 6.15 1.00 171.4555 PITHORAGARH GANGOLIHAT 05070817701 GIC JHALTOLA Hill 1 1 1 71.76 1.65 73.4156 PITHORAGARH GANGOLIHAT 05070820002 GIC CHAURPAL Hill 1 1 1 1 96.44 3.15 1.00 100.5957 PITHORAGARH GANGOLIHAT 05070831302 G.I.C. PAWADHAR Hill 1 1 1 1 95.72 2.05 97.7758 RUDRAPRYAG AUGUSTYAMUNI 05030121304 GIC RATURA Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9559 RUDRAPRYAG AUGUSTYAMUNI 05030127902 GIC BASUKEDAR Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9560 RUDRAPRYAG AUGUSTYAMUNI 05030106702 GIC BHANAJ Hill 1 1 1 1 95.72 2.05 97.7761 RUDRAPRYAG JAKHOLI 05030214602 GIC JAWARI Hill 1 1 1 1 95.72 2.05 97.7762 RUDRAPRYAG JAKHOLI 05030204404 GIC KOT BANGAR Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9563 RUDRAPRYAG UKHIMATH 05030304102 GIC MAKKU Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9564 TEHRI BHILANGANA 05040101902 GIC NOUL BASAR Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9565 TEHRI BHILANGANA 05040115704 GIC RAGDEE Hill 1 1 1 1 92.54 3.30 1.00 96.8466 TEHRI BHILANGANA 05040124402 GHS BHATWADA Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0067 TEHRI JOUNPUR 05040516904 GIC MARODA (G) Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9568 TEHRI NARENDRANAGAR 05040725502 GIC DHUDHAR Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0069 TEHRI NARENDRANAGAR 05040714202 GIC PAW KEE DEVI Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0070 TEHRI NARENDRANAGAR 05040708105 GIC TIMLI Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9571 TEHRI PRATAPNAGAR 05040811601 GIC SILARI Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9572 TEHRI THOULDHAR 05040910702 GIC BANDA (GUSAIN) Hill 1 1 1 1 1 120.40 3.55 1.00 124.9573 U S NAGAR RUDRAPUR 05120200902 GIC BAGWALA Plain 1 1 1 1 1 81.29 3.55 1.00 85.8474 U S NAGAR RUDRAPUR 05120209501 GIC FAUJIMATKOTA Plain 1 1 33.64 0.65 34.2975 U S NAGAR KHATIMA 05120401602 GHS SABORA Plain 1 1 1 1 66.49 2.55 1.00 70.0476 U S NAGAR SITARGANJ 05120609002 GIC BIJTI Plain 1 1 1 1 66.49 2.55 1.00 70.0477 U S NAGAR BAJPUR 05120701212 GIC BARHENI Plain 1 1 2 64.61 2.65 67.2678 UTTARKASHI BHATWARI 05010109242 GGHS GYANSHU Hill 1 1 1 73.77 1.05 74.8279 UTTARKASHI BHATWARI 05010104206 GIC MANERI Hill 1 4 109.75 4.40 114.1580 UTTARKASHI BHATWARI 05010107804 GHS ATHALI Hill 1 1 1 74.49 2.15 1.00 77.6481 UTTARKASHI CHINYALISAUR 05010205211 GIC CHINYALISAUR Hill 1 21.95 0.40 22.3582 UTTARKASHI CHINYALISAUR 05010208407 GIC KHALSI Hill 1 1 1 2 117.67 3.05 120.7283 UTTARKASHI CHINYALISAUR 05010201602 GIC KOTDHAR Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.0084 UTTARKASHI DUNDA 05010308314 GGHS GENWLA Hill 1 1 1 1 2 142.35 4.55 1.00 147.9085 UTTARKASHI DUNDA 05010305503 GHS BHAKDA Hill 1 1 1 1 2 142.35 4.55 1.00 147.9086 UTTARKASHI MORI 05010403605 GIC GADUGAD Hill 1 1 2 93.71 2.65 96.3687 UTTARKASHI NAUGAON 05010503603 GIC RAJGADI Hill 1 1 1 1 98.45 2.55 1.00 102.00

TOTAL 62 69 77 75 69 8043.86 239.15 62.00 8345.01


( 148 )

Convergence with other DepartmentRMSA has emphasized on convergence with another state department /schemes to gainoptimum benefit for infrastructural development of schools. The following chart is showingconvergence activities in the state:S.No. Activities Department/Scheme1 Availability of land Local community2 Preparation of estimates Construction agencies3 Third Party Monitoring State Planning Department & PWD4 Site development works State sector scheme5 Boundary wall State sector scheme6 Drinking water facilities Swajal/Peyjal Nigam7 Toilet facilities Corporate sectors8 Other infrastructure facilities MLA/MP funds, district plan, state sector schemes9 Monitoring of civil works SSA Engineers/Education Department Officers

Chapter - 11 : Community Participation, Mobilisation and SMDC Planning for Implementation

( 149 )

Chapter - 11Community Participation, Mobilisation and SMDC Planning for

Implementation

School Management and Development CommitteeAt the school level, a School Management and Developments Committee (SMDC)constituted, which is be responsible for making the perspective and annual work plans at theschool level. A savings bank account is opened in the name of the concerned SMDC of everyschool in the nearby branch of any nationalized bank. The following is the structure isproposed for SMDC at the school level-1 Principal Chairman2 Senior teacher Member Secretary3 Teacher (Social Science) Member4 Teacher (Science) Member5 Teacher (Mathematics) Member6 Male Guardian Member7 One Female Guardian Member8 Two Parnchayat Member/Ward Member Member9 One representative of SC/ST Category Member10 One representative of Educationally backward cadre Member11 One Member of Mahila Dal Member12 One Member of Education Development Committee of every villageresaved by school Member13 Three members with science, art and cultural backgroundNominated by DPO/DEO Member14 One Education Office Nominated by DEO Member15 One representative of Finance and Accounts MemberThe meeting of SMDC is held minimum once in every three month. SMDC is comprisedof two subcommittees-(1) School Construction Monitoring Committee(2) Educational Committee.These committee is constituted as follows:1. School Construction & Monitoring CommitteeThe Committee takes stock of the School Planning, estimates, management inspections,monitoring, reporting, maintenance of accounts, and presentation of accounts in the meetingsof SMDC and village education committee. The committee is be as follows-1 Principal Chairman2 Member Panchayat (nominated by Gram Pradhan/ward member(urban area) Member3 One Guardian nominated by PTA Member4 Junior Engineer(expertise in construction work) Member Secretary5 One member of Finance and Account cadre MemberThe meeting of school construction committee is be held once in every three months.The committee monitors the different construction works being under taken in the schoolregularly. After the start of construction work, the evaluation will be done by third partytechnical institute/ institution which will give its report after completion of 25%, 50%,&75%ofthe work respectively. Construction work is done by the construction agency in school.2. Educational CommitteeThe committee is responsible for all educational activities, planning, management,monitoring, supervision, SEMIS, quality education, equity, children with special needs, student-


( 150 )

teacher attendance, teacher training, guidance & Counselling, student achievement andcurricular activities. The members of the committee are as follows-1 Principal Chairman2 Guardians of one student studying in all secondary classes Member3 One Astt. Teacher each of the following subjects: Science/Maths,Social Science, Language (Hindi/English), Art/Physical Education Member4 One member to be nominated by the Principal Member SecretaryIn accordance with the GOI guidelines in the secondary school where classes VI – VIIIare running with secondary classed SMC constituted in reference of RTE is also working asSMDC. So only in 228 secondary & higher secondary schools SMDC have been constituted.Parent-Teacher AssociationParents Teacher Association is constituted in every school. The meeting of thisassociation is held minimum once in every month. Every teacher maintains a register in whichsuggestions and complaints of the guardians will be registered and the principal sees andinsures that actions are taken as per suggestions and complaints, regularly. This register isproduced in the monthly meetings of SMDC.Action Plan

SMDC meeting along with Academy Committee and Construction Committee will beorganized every month to ensure the participation of parents and community members. Sharing of pre and post LLA result and competencies of students with parents andguardian. Participation of parent and community members in National Festivals at school level. Celebration of foundation day and annual function day of the school. To enhance the enrolment in the school Enrolment Drive with the help of parents andcommunity members. The principal and teachers along with the students of the school will organized theschool related activities in the vicinity (Village /ward) of the school once in every threemonths.

Proposal for 2017-18The community members will be sensitize through 02 days training at school level. Themodule and the state level Master Trainer for the training will be developed at state level afterexploring training need analysis with the help of State Resource Group (SRG) and SIEMATfaculty. The reference book "Abhyudaya" revised in the year 2014-15 will also beneficial in theSMDC training.The State level master trainer will develop district level master trainers. The districtlevel master trainer training will be held at district level. The district level master trainer willdevelop school level master trainer. The school level master trainer training will be held atdistrict/block level. These school level master trainers will execute the training at school levelin the month of October 2016.Proposal for SMDC Training 2017-18

S.No. Districts No. ofSchools

Physical(No. of SMDC

Members)

Unit cost(in lakh)

TotalAmount(in lakh)1 Almora 04 80 0.006 0.4802 Bageshwar 0 0 0.006 0.0003 Chamoli 0 0 0.006 0.0004 Champawat 07 140 0.006 0.8405 Dehradun 48 960 0.006 5.7606 Haridwar 32 640 0.006 3.8407 Nainital 01 20 0.006 0.120


( 151 )

S.No. Districts No. ofSchools

Physical(No. of SMDC

Members)

Unit cost(in lakh)

TotalAmount(in lakh)8 Pauri 08 160 0.006 0.9609 Pithoragarh 03 60 0.006 0.36010 Rudraprayag 11 220 0.006 1.32011 Tehri 56 1120 0.006 6.72012 U.S. Nagar 02 40 0.006 0.24013 Uttarkashi 60 1200 0.006 7.200

Total 232 4640 27.840

Financial RequirementAn amount of Rs. 27.840 Lakh is required for this activity.

Chapter - 12 : Financial Management and Budget Estimates

( 152 )

Chapter - 12Financial Management and Budget Estimates

GOI releases funds based upon the approved Annual works plan and budget (AWPB) ofSIS. The fund will be released in two installments. For this purpose the separate bank accounthas been opened. The first release is made soon after the approval of the AWPB and isapproximately 50 percent of the GOI share. Subsequently, the state government releases itsshare to the SIS. The second installment is released based upon demand from the state (usuallysix months after the first release) in a similar manner. This release takes into account theexpenditure incurred and a forecast of cash requirements for the rest of the financial year.12.1 Within the StateA separate bank account has been maintained by all district project offices and SchoolManagement and Development Committee (SMDCs). The SIS releases funds to the districtoffice based upon the approved annual plan, expenditure incurred, and future requirements.Further the district office releases funds to the SMDC and schools following the sameprinciples. However, releases at this level consider ‘norms’ as laid down in the proposed RMSAmanual.In the fund flow it is important to note that all releases from GOI are made electronicallyand a significant number of districts will further release the funds to implementing agencies,electronically.Procurement for RMSA is carried out in accordance with the Manual for financialManagement and Procurement (FMP) with the state procurement rule 2008. Audit will be doneby impaneled charted accountant. The utilization certificate is duly forwarded to the MHRD bythe state governing council for further release. The district maintains the accounts in thedouble entry system. The state office audits the computerized day-wise, head-wise, month-wise expenditure periodically. Monthly review will be organized by the state to assess the levelof performance.12.2 Transparency and Accountability

12.2.1 Role of State GovernmentThe Right to Information Act should be followed both in letter and in spirit by all theimplementing machinery of the Government Departments in all matters relating to RMSA.Section 4 of the Act which concerns proactive disclosure of information, should be strictlycomplied with all levels. Key documents related to the RMSA should be proactively disclosed tothe public. Without waiting for anyone to “apply” for them .A list of such documents should beprepared by the State Mission and updated from time to time. Public access to key records andkey information should be ensured at all levels. This should also be displayed on the website.The school display board has to show all investments being made in the school. Teacherattendance should be publically displayed, for improving the quality of school level dataregarding enrolment, attendance, retention dropout etc. besides the maintenance of otherrecords and registers.Month-wise updated data on-progress of each component of the scheme, progress ofexpenditure and utilization including funds received and spent. Payments made, workssanctioned and works started, cost of works and details of expenditure on it, duration of worketc. should be made public in a pre-designated format outside all offices of all agencies involvedin implementing the scheme. All these information should also be shared with the GramPanchyats/ULBs and should be discussed in their meetings.Similar efforts at transparency should be made right up to the State level. Copies of allsanctioned orders for re project/project activities would be pasted on the website of thedepartment of secondary education.


( 153 )

12.2.2 Annual ReportsThe Central Government as well as the State Governments shall prepare an annualreport on the implementation of the scheme. This report will be laid before parliament and theState Governments respectively.12.2.3 Financial AuditThe Audit report of the Chartered Accountant and the Utilization certificate for theprevious year must be submitted latest by September next year by the District Project Officer.The District Project Officer will ensure that the opening and closing Balance included in boththe Audit Report and the Utilization certificate tally. In case there is variation due to anyunavoidable reason, it has to be clearly explained with reasons to the satisfaction of the SIS,with documentary support, if any.12.2.4 Physical AuditA physical audit of the works undertaken will be conducted to verify the quality ofworks and to check that the expenditures incurred have led to the creation of durable assets.12.2.5 Action on Audit Reports by the State GovernmentA copy of every audit report, whether conducted by the charted accountant, the internalAudit and grievance cell and auditors of the Accountant General or Comptroller and AuditGeneral and Social Audit reports (if any) will be sent to the State Government concerned.The State government will ensure speedy action against the concerned officials/non-officialsfor misappropriation of funds, frauds, incorrect measurement, false entries in theregisters/records and other irregularities of a serious nature, resulting in the leakage ofGovernment/Public funds/resources. The state Government will also take appropriate steps toprevent such irregularities.

Scheme-wise Budgetary Proposal for 2017-18Rs. In lakhs

S.No. Scheme

Fresh Proposal for 2017-18Non

Recurring % NR Recurring % R Total1 RMSA 8345.00945 32.41% 17406.18218 67.59% 25751.191632 ICT 0.00000 0.00% 600.00000 100.00% 600.000003 IEDSS 0.00000 0.00% 315.91766 100.00% 315.917664 VE 0.00000 0.00% 1909.00000 100.00% 1909.000005 GH 0.00000 0.00% 467.81000 100.00% 467.81000State Component (MMER) 0.00000 0.00% 1452.19596 100.00% 1452.19596Uttarakhand 8345.00945 27.36% 22151.10580 72.64% 30496.11525

NR: Non-Recurring R: Recurring

Activity-wise Budgetary Proposal for 2017-18Rs. In lakhs

Master Head NormsFresh

Proposal for 2017-18Unit Cost Phy Fin

1 2 3 4 5=3*4RMSANon - RecurringA New Schools / Upgraded Schoolsa.1 1 Section School As per DSR 0.00000 0 0.00000a.2 2 Section School As per DSR 0.00000 0 0.00000

Total 0 0.00000


( 154 )



1 2 3 4 5=3*4B Strengthening of ExistingSchools

87b.1 Additional Classroom As per DSR 22.12101 69 1526.34969b.2 Art/Craft Room As per DSR 21.23571 77 1635.14967b.3 Computer Room As per DSR 23.00522 69 1587.36018b.4 Lab Equipment (Sci Lab) - 1.00000 62 62.00000b.5 Library Room As per DSR 26.54653 75 1990.98975b.6 Science Lab As per DSR 24.88968 62 1543.16016b.7 Toilet Block As per DSR 0.00000 0 0.00000Total 8345.00945

Total (Non - Recurring) 8345.00945RecurringA Annual Granta.1 School Grant All Govt. Schools 0.50000 2253 1126.50000

Total 1126.50000B Staff For New Schoolsb.1 Duftary/Office Attendant 1.80000 0 0.00000b.2 Head Masters 8.40000 0 0.00000b.3 Lab Attendant 1.80000 0 0.00000b.4 Subject Teacher 7.20000 0 0.00000Total 0.00000C Staff for Previous Year Schoolsc.1 Duftary Office Attendant 1.80000 0 0.00000c.2 Head Masters 8.40000 280 2352.00000c.3 Lab Attendant 1.80000 0 0.00000c.4 Subject Teacher 7.20000 1562 11246.40000Total 13598.40000D Community Mobilizationd.1 SMDC Training 0.00600 4640 27.84000Total 27.84000E Traininge.1 In service training ofTeachers including HMs inTeaching Hindi, English andSST, Teachers (Govt.+ Aided) 0.03000 7432 222.96000

e.2 Training for Educationalofficer (Only for DEOSecondary) 01 for each district(03 days) 0.00900 13 0.11700e.3 Training for HMs (SLDP) 02 per District (30days training) 0.12000 26 3.12000e.4 Training of Master Trainer 50 From Eachdistrict (10 persubject) (06 daystraining)

0.01800 600 10.80000e.5 Training of SRGs 04 Each District (10days training) 0.03000 52 1.56000e.6 Trainng of KRPs Hindi, English andSST Teachers (01for each subject perdistrict) 06 daystraining

0.01800 39 0.70200Total 239.25900F Quality Components


( 155 )



1 2 3 4 5=3*4f.1 Professional DevelopmentProgramme for HeadMasters 5 HM per Block for16 days training 0.04800 475 22.80000f.2 School Accreditation -Shaala Siddhi Students of Class IX- XII of Govt. schools 0.00010 445552 44.55520

Total 67.35520G Equity Componentsg.1 Educational BackwardMinorities OrientatedActivities(Promotion of Art & Craft)Select Govt. Schools 0.20000 244 48.80000

Total 48.80000H Project on Science & Maths(RAA)h.1 Excursion Trip for Studentswithin State Class IX students ofGovt. schools 0.00200 92032 184.06400h.2 Exposure Visit outside theState 10 students of ClassX for each district 0.03000 130 3.90000h.3 In-service Training of Math& Science teachers Maths & ScienceTeachers (Govt. +Aided) 0.03000 4636 139.08000h.4 Training of KRPs Maths and ScienceTeachers (01 foreach subject perdistrict) 06 daystraining

0.01800 26 0.46800h.5 Maths Kit No. of schools(excluding previousyear schools) 0.01500 779 11.68500h.6 Science Kit No. of schools(excluding previousyear schools) 0.07500 899 67.42500h.7 Science Exhibition/BookFair 1.00000 13 13.00000

Total 419.62200I Project- Kala Utsavi.1 Kala Utsav Per District 1.00000 13 13.00000i2 TA/DA allowances forNational Level Only for State Level 1.00000 1 1.00000Total 14.00000J Project- Girls Empowermentj.1 Training in Marshal Arts toall girls / Self Defence No. of schools(Selected fromdistricts) 0.09000 244 21.96000

j.2 Inspiration/MotivationCamp for Girl Students each blocks (onlyfor girls) (10 dayscamp) 1.00000 62 62.00000Total 83.96000K Project- IT/e-governancek.1 Complete SchoolManagement System(Shaala Darpan) No. of secondarymodel schools 0.20000 190 38.00000

k.2 School Database All students of class 0.00001 696348 6.96348


( 156 )



1 2 3 4 5=3*4Management InformationSystem (SDMIS) IX - XII of all schoolsTotal 44.96348L Project- Enhancement of

Learning Achievement inEducation (LLA)l.1 Assessment Tool No. of children inclass IX (Govt. +Aided) 0.00100 120317 120.31700l.2 Model Test No. of schools (Govt.+ Aided) 0.00100 2656 2.65600l.3 Printing No. of children inclass IX (Govt. +Aided) 0.00100 120317 120.31700l.4 Workshop 01 Each District 0.50000 13 6.50000

Total 249.79000M Project on English (Unnati)m.1 Training module/ReadingMaterial No. of class IX & Xchildren (Govt.Schools) 0.00250 184231 460.57750m.2 Unnati-English teaching No. of instructor(Govt. Schools) 0.45000 2253 1013.85000m.3 Monitoring & Evaluation No. of Govt. schools 0.00500 2253 11.26500

Total 1485.69250N MMERn.1 MMER (Recurring) 05% of TotalAWP&B 0.00000 1 1452.19596Total (Recurring) 18858.37814

Total RMSA (Non - Recurring + Recurring) 27203.38759ICTNon - RecurringA Outright Purchase Basis/State

Modela.1 Computers (Includingserver with terminals) Rs. 5.10 lacs (for 10Computers) perschool 5.10000 0 0.00000a.2 Educational Software & CDROMs/e-Content Rs. 45000/- perschool 0.45000 0 0.00000a.3 Furniture Rs. 25000/- perschool 0.25000 0 0.00000a.4 Operating System &Application Software Rs. 20000/- perschool 0.20000 0 0.00000

Total 0.00000B Boot Modelb.1 Computers (Includingserver with terminals) Rs. 5.10 lacs (for 10Computers) perschool 0.00000 0 0.00000Total 0.00000C Other Non-recurringc.1 Induction Training (onetime) Rs. 400/- per day(Avg. 10 Teachers) 0.04000 0 0.00000Total 0.00000


( 157 )



1 2 3 4 5=3*4Total (Non - Recurring) 0.00000

RecurringA Salary of Computer Teachera.1 Outright Purchase(Recurring) Rs. 10000/- p.m. perschool 1.20000 0 0.00000Total 0.00000B Other Recurring Componentsb.1 Computer, Stationery(Printer, Cartridges, CD-ROMs, DVD, paper etc.) Rs. 80000/- peryear per school 0.80000 500 400.00000

b.2 Electricity Charges Rs. 1000 per monthper school 0.12000 500 60.00000b.3 Expenses onDiesel/Kerosene forGenerator Rs. 12000/- peryear per school 0.12000 500 60.00000b.4 Internet / Broad bandCharges Rs. 10000/- peryear per school 0.10000 500 50.00000b.5 Telephone Charges Rs. 500 /- p.m. perschool 0.06000 500 30.00000

Total 600.00000Total (Recurring) 600.00000

Total ICT (Non - Recurring + Recurring) 600.00000IEDSSNon - RecurringA Non-Recurringa.1 Equipment for ResourceRoom Rs. 70000/- perschool 0.70000 0 0.00000

Total (Non - Recurring) 0.00000RecurringB Recurringb.1 Books & Stationery (Inc.Braille Books for Blind andLarge Print Books for LowVision)

No. of students(40% & Above) 0.00550 985 5.41750b.2 Environment Buildingprogramme Rs. 10000/- perblock 0.10000 95 9.50000b.3 Escort Allowance for BlindChildren No. of students(40% & Above) 0.03600 50 1.80000b.4 Identification andAssessment (Formal andfunctional Assessments) No. of students asper UDISE 0.00200 1261 2.52200b.5 Providing Aids & Appliances As per Disctrict 0.00757 767 5.80466b.6 Salary (Previous Spl.Educators) Including specialPay of 400/- 2.88000 95 273.60000b.7 Stipend for Girls No. of students(40% & Above) 0.02400 494 11.85600b.8 Uniform No. of students(40% & Above) 0.00550 985 5.41750

Total (Recurring) 315.91766Total IEDSS (Non - Recurring + Recurring) 315.91766

VE


( 158 )



1 2 3 4 5=3*4Non - RecurringA Introduction of VE in schoolsa.1 Tools, Equipment &Furniture 6.22500 0 0.00000a.2 Workshop / Laboratory 0.00000 0 0.00000

Total (Non - Recurring) 0.00000RecurringB Recurring supportb.3 Cost of providing Hands onSkill Training toStudents(New) No. of schools 0.37500 0 0.00000

b.4 Cost of providing Hands onSkill Training toStudents(prev.) No. of schools 0.37500 200 75.00000b.5 Flexible Pool for EngagingResource Person (New) No. of schools 7.25000 0 0.00000b.6 Flexible Pool for EngagingResource Persons( prev.) No. of schools 7.25000 200 1450.00000b.7 Office Expenses /Contingencies for newschool(New) No. of schools 1.00000 0 0.00000b.8 Office Expenses /Contingencies for newschool(Prev.) No. of schools 1.00000 200 200.00000b.9 Raw material Grant for newschool per course (New) No. of schools 0.70000 0 0.00000b.10 Raw material grant for newschool per course (Prev.) No. of schools 0.70000 200 140.00000

Total 1865.00000C Teacher Trainingc.1 Induction training ofTeachers (New) 04 week training for02 teachers eachschool 0.11000 0 0.00000c.2 Induction training ofTeachers (prev. ) 04 week training for02 teachers eachschool 0.11000 400 44.00000

Total 44.00000Total (Recurring) 1909.00000

Total VE (Non - Recurring + Recurring) 1909.00000GHNon - RecurringA Non Recurringa.1 Civil Works 0.00000 0 0.00000a.2 Furniture and Equipment No. of GH 0.00000 0 0.00000

Total (Non - Recurring) 0.00000RecurringB Recurringb.1 Astt. Cook (Two) Rs. 2500/- permonth per cook 0.60000 38 22.80000b.2 Chowkidar Rs. 3000/- permonth 0.60000 19 11.40000b.3 Electricity / Water per year Rs. 60000/- per 0.60000 19 11.40000


( 159 )



1 2 3 4 5=3*4yearb.4 Fooding/lodgingexpenditure for Girl Child Rs. 1500/- permonth 0.18000 1900 342.00000b.5 Head Cook (One) Rs. 3000/- permonth per cook 0.60000 19 11.40000b.6 Honorarium of Warden (inaddition to her salaryteacher) Rs. 5000/- permonth 0.60000 19 11.40000b.7 Maintenance per year Rs. 40000/- peryear 0.40000 19 7.60000b.8 Medical care Rs. 750/- per yearper girl 0.00750 1900 14.25000b.9 Miscellaneous Rs. 40000/- peryear 0.40000 19 7.60000b.10 News paper / Magazinesand sports Rs. 2,000/- perMonth 0.24000 19 4.56000b.11 Rent 0.60000 1 0.60000b.12 Toiletries and sanitation Rs. 100/- permonth for each girl 0.01200 1900 22.80000

Total (Recurring) 467.81000Total GH (Non - Recurring + Recurring) 467.81000

Total Integrated RMSA (Non - Recurring) 8345.00945Total Integrated RMSA (Recurring) 22151.10580

Total Integrated RMSA (Non - Recurring + Recurring) 30496.11525

Integrated Annual Work Plan & Budget (AWP&B) 2017-18

Documents