Top Banner
INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009
22

INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Mar 31, 2015

Download

Documents

Jase Tier
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE

Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI)Simon Fraser UniversityJune 26, 2009

Page 2: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Coalition for Networked Information (CNI)

Founded in 1990 by ARL and EDUCAUSE Mission: accelerate progress in digital

information related to research and education

200+ member institutions Executive Director Clifford Lynch Headquarters in Washington, DC www.cni.org Fall and Spring Task Force (membership)

meetings

Page 3: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Highlight Three IR Issues

Revisiting the mission Strategies for increasing content

submission Inclusion of new types of content

Page 4: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

IR: Mission Possible?

Is the mission to provide stewardship for all types of digital products being produced at an institution? Focus on stewardship role of library/archives Focus on gray literature produced at the

university Is the mission to provide a place for published

faculty output, possibly supplemented with other materials like research data? Focus on Open Access policies

…or something else? (credit: Clifford Lynch, 2009)

Page 5: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

IR: Mission Possible?

Do you have a strong mandate or incentive to provide this service? Clear signal from administrators/faculty Dedication to fulfilling the library mission

How motivated is the library to provide resources for the IR?

“If you build it, they will come” is generally not working in this arena

Page 6: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Who should be involved in establishing or revisiting the mission? Librarians Academic administrators Faculty Faculty governing body Graduate students Others?

Page 7: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Repositories

What serves your constituency best and for what content? Institutional Disciplinary National Regional (EU, etc.)

How do the levels of repositories interrelate and interoperate?

How can you explain this issue to researchers?

Page 8: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Strategies for Content Submission There is no substitute for understanding

your user population Interviews Observation of workflow Speaking at faculty meetings and getting

feedback Surveys or other data collection

Identify target departments/institutes

Page 9: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Observation/Interview at U. Rochester

Page 10: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Strategies for Content Submission The “Special Libraries solution” – do it for

them The build a tool(s) to make it easy solution The institutional Open Access faculty

resolution solution The requirement solution, e.g. for ETDs or

institutional reporting The “payoff” solution – make the IR

something that enhances faculty’s research dissemination and visibility

Page 11: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Faculty Motivation and Compliance

“Although self-archiving is ‘so simple that achild could do it,’ sometimes a child is notavailable…”Therefore, the library does the work for faculty,even reformatting preprints for the IR.Paul Royster, U. Nebraska

Page 12: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Motivation Strategies

Page 13: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Researcher Interest and Motivation Disciplinary differences University mandates Personal reputation; evidence of use Dissemination of information to

developing countries Concern about digital information

curation after retirement

Page 14: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Motivation Strategies

European Economics Portal NEOO Open access to economics information Peer status

Page 15: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Compliance Strategies

95% researchers say they would add content to IR if required by institution or funder, and in test cases around 90% complied

Alma Swan, American Scientist listserv, 8/06

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Mandate

NIH Deposit Mandate in the US

Page 16: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

IRs and Publishing Programs What are the goals of each What is the relationship between

programs Clarify relationships for the library and

for researchers

Page 17: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Inclusion of New Types of Content What are your institutional goals for

moving beyond text/PDF? Data related to science, humanities, etc.

research Multi-media objects Learning objects

What claims can you make about stewardship?

Page 18: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Data in Repositories

Storage needs Formats Updating Migrating Subject and tool expertise Authenticity/tampering

Page 19: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Research Data in Repositories

Page 20: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Moving Forward

Continue to build understanding of your users

Clarify the relationship between institutional/national/regional and subject repositories

Do something important for your institution

Share results of your initiatives with others

Page 21: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Resources

Lynch, Clifford. “Revisiting Institutional Repositories”

Will be available at http://www.cni.org/tfms/2009a.spring/abstracts/PB-revisiting-lynch.html

“Increasing Use and Content through Creative Service-Repository Bundling,” U. Nebraska

http://www.arl.org/sparc/publications/media-pubs/index.shtml

Page 22: INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES UPDATE Joan K. Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) Simon Fraser University June 26, 2009.

Contact