Institutional Repositories in the UK Where are we and where are we going? Bill Hubbard, SHERPA Manager, University of Nottingham
Mar 28, 2015
Institutional Repositories in the UK
Where are we and where are we going?
Bill Hubbard,
SHERPA Manager,
University of Nottingham
Lantern waste
The start of the journey . . .
Open Access
Budapest Open Access Initiative
“An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good . . .”
– http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
Lofty principals - can we climb this far?
Why? Because its there?
Open access benefits – for authors– for researchers– for research processes– for institutions– for research funders– for public
Offers a sustainable basis for the future Some people have gone there and seen it working
The Open Access landscape
Open Access - definitions– Open Access Journals– Open Access Repositories
Data Providers and Service Providers– Global repository network to underpin adoption– Author-led and innovative services to support use
Stakeholders– authors, researchers, institutions, funders, learned societies,
public, publishers . . .
The route
The route: institutional repositories
The OAI-PMH allows a single gateway to search and access many repositories– subject-based portals or views– subject-based classification and search– institutional storage and support
Practical reasons– use institutional infrastructure– integration into work-flows and systems – support is close to academic users and contributors
SHERPA Partners
– University of Nottingham – University of Birmingham – University of Bristol – University of Cambridge – University of Durham – University of Edinburgh – University of Glasgow – London LEAP Consortium – University of Newcastle – University of Oxford – White Rose Partnership – The British Library– AHDS
London LEAP Consortium – Birkbeck College – Goldsmiths College – Imperial College – Institute of Cancer
Research – Kings College – LSE– Royal Holloway – Queen Mary – SOAS– School of Pharmacy
(SoP)– UCL
White Rose Partnership – University of Leeds – University of Sheffield – University of York
Affiliates– Trinity College Dublin – Cranfield University – University of Exeter – University of Leicester – University of Liverpool – Sheffield Hallam University – University of St Andrews – CCLRC
Projects and Services
SHERPA Partnership SHERPA Plus SHERPA DP, DP2 RoMEO JULIET OpenDOAR UKCoRR
Repositories Support Project DRIVER The Depot Intute Repository Search DART-Europe ETHOS
Russell & 1994 Groups
University of Bath Birkbeck University of Birmingham University of Bristol University of Cambridge Cardiff University University of Durham University of East Anglia University of Edinburgh University of Essex University of Exeter University of Glasgow Goldsmiths
University of Reading Royal Holloway University of St Andrews University of Sheffield SOAS University of Southampton University of Surrey University of Sussex University of Warwick UCL University of York
Imperial College King's College London Lancaster University University of Leeds University of Leicester University of Liverpool Loughborough University LSE University of Manchester University of Newcastle University of Nottingham University of Oxford Queen Mary Queen’s University
Repositories by Continent
European Repositories
Repository Types
Where we have gone so far
JISC FAIR programme, and many others . . . GNU eprints, TARDIS, DAEDALUS, EThOS,
VERSIONS, Repository Bridge, DRIVER, et al Overseas and international initiatives Advocacy and engagement Policy development Growth of OA Community Conferences galore!
Joining the party
Institutional mandates Funding mandates
– RCUK– Wellcome Trust– Arthritis Research Campaign and more
Parliamentary Select Committee Report European Commission
– 'Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the Scientific Publication Markets of Europe‘
– Petition - 22,000 signatures
NIH Mandate
Path graphic
Looking back down the path
Process of setting up repositories is ok Systems works - put things in and get them out Copyright was not the unbridgeable crevasse we
feared . . . Achieved regional, national, international support OA academic approval at over 80%
but . . .
The difficulties
A good case is not enough The way across Copyright Crevasse was too narrow
for authors’ comfort The view from Base Camp was hard to shake
– subject basis, quality control, plagiarism
Reluctance to leave well-trodden paths The Search party didn’t turn up The view from here is still too restricted Authors want sherpas to carry the load
How far to the summit graphic
How far to the summit?
Need high percentage ingest - how high? Need authors to save their critical versions - how do
we achieve this? Need clear messages of support and facilities to all
academics - how do we reach them? Need sherpas to take the load, or strong leadership
to get authors to take responsibility Need clear development paths for everyone to follow
Obstacles graphic
Obstacles & tricky conditions
Embargoes Double-charge access becoming embedded “Crevasse of Copyright” is still unsettling Loss of focus within repositories Metadata-only entries cloud the view Author engagement cf approval
Assistance
SHERPA - www.sherpa.ac.uk/update
RoMEO - www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo
JULIET - www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet
OpenDOAR - www.opendoar.org and ~/search
RSP - www.rsp.ac.uk
The Depot - depot.edina.ac.uk
Intute Repository Search - irs.ukoln.ac.uk
BASE - digital.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php
DRIVER - www.driver-support.eu
UKCoRR - www.ukcorr.org
Next stage
Search teams are forging up the slopes Mandates will help us along - support them
– be aware of scale and schedule– engage research support offices– clear services for academics
Assistance is available Development paths becoming clearer . . .
Development path - ingest
Research papers - published Conference papers Book chapters eTheses Research data Learning and teaching materials Grey literature
Development path - use
Access– exposure
– publication lists
– shop-windows
– integration with information environment
Open Access Re-use support
– data-mining
– evidence-based work
Overlay journals Citation services
– integration with library provision– research management– research audit
Halfway up . . .
Lengthy climb But if we had asked how long it would take . . . Paths do appear unexpectedly Other social forces also at work Beginning to see the view
Funders Projects