INSTITUTION NAME: BLADEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE STATE: … · The institution offering the degree program(s) is located in a U.S. state, district, or territory and currently accredited

1

ANNUAL REPORT

INSTITUTION NAME: BLADEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE STATE: NORTH CAROLINA

PLEASE INDICATE THE DATE FOR WHICH THE PROGRAM IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT

X SEPTEMBER 30, 2019

☐MARCH 31, 20__

PLEASE INDICATE WHICH ANNUAL REPORT THE PROGRAM IS SUBMITTING

☐YEAR 1 ANNUAL REPORT



XYEAR 4 ANNUAL REPORT WOULD YOU LIKE THE ASSESSMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH PEER FEEDBACK ON THE KEY ASSESSMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE STANDARD YOU SELECTED TO REPORT DATA ON IN THIS YEAR 4 ANNUAL REPORT? IF YOU CHECK “YES” SEE PAGE X FOR MORE INFORMATION.

XYES ☐ NO

☐YEAR 5 ANNUAL REPORT [NOTE IN YEAR 6 THE PROGRAM WILL SUBMIT A RENEWAL SELF-STUDY REPORT]

NAME OF PERSON COMPLETING THIS REPORT: PRISCILLA CAUSEY-POPE DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2019

FormRev: 0819 2

PLEASE REVIEW AND CHECK THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS AS APPROPRIATE

☐ OUR PROGRAM IS RESPONDING TO CONDITIONS (MAKE SURE TO COMPLETE PART G OF THE REPORT IF YOU CHECKED THIS BOX) X I AFFIRM THAT I HAVE READ THE CURRENT NAEYC EARLY CHILDHOOD HIGHER EDUCATION ACCREDITATION HANDBOOK (REQUIRED FOR ALL ACCREDITED PROGRAMS)

X I VERIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT IS ACCURATE (REQUIRED FOR ALL ACCREDITED PROGRAMS) X OUR PROGRAM HAS SUBMITTED ITS ANNUAL FEE FOR THE CURRENT YEAR (REQUIRED FOR ALL ACCREDITED PROGRAMS)

☐ I WOULD LIKE TO SCHEDULE A PHONE CONSULTATION WITH NAEYC STAFF

FormRev: 0819 3

Table of Contents

A. Updates to Contact Information……………………………………………………………………..4

B. Reaffirming Meeting Eligibility Requirements……………………………...…………………5

C. Updates to Program Context…………………………………………………………….…………….7

D. Reporting Program Outcome Data……………………………………………..….……………….9

E. Reporting and Analyzing Data for a Standard…………………….……………….………..12

a. Key Assessment Title Chart…………………………………………………..…………….12 b. Chart of Key Assessments Aligned to the Standards…………………………...12 c. Reporting Data for a Standard………………………………………………..………....15 d. Data Analysis Questions……….…………………………………………………………....15

F. Standard 7 – Field Experiences………………………………………………………………………16

G. Response to Conditions (only for programs accredited with conditions)….….....18

H. Year 4 Program Submitting Key Assessments for Review………………………………19

The purposes of the Annual Report are to:

Affirm the program’s continued compliance with Accreditation Eligibility Requirements

Document substantive changes to a program

Provide updates on the program’s context

Provide Program Outcome Data

Support the program’s continuous improvement efforts in collecting and analyzing candidate performance data

Provide data to inform the early childhood degree landscape

(For some programs) Respond to any conditions identified by the Commission as part of an accreditation decision

(For programs in Year 4) Provide an opportunity for feedback on key assessments as the program prepares for renewal

FormRev: 0819 4

A. UPDATES TO CONTACT INFORMATION

Institution Name Bladen Community College

Mailing Address PO Box 266, Dublin NC 28332

Program Name(s) Early Childhood Education, AAS

Program name(s) as listed in college catalog, including degree type (A.A., A.A.T. etc.). If listing more than one program, please separate program names by a semicolon.

Early Childhood Education, AAS, Career Pathway

Program’s website address (please list the website address for each program if including more than one program)

http://www.bladencc.edu/academics/public-service-technologies/early-childhood/

Does the program’s name above differ from what is currently listed on the NAEYC website (http://www.naeyc.org/highered/accreditation/accredited-programs)?

X No ☐ Yes

Program Name (if the institution has more than one accredited program)_______________________________________

Primary contact (faculty member representing the program) (for institutions with more than one accredited program, please add another row to the table if there are changes across programs):

Name: Priscilla Pope, Ed.D

Title: Instructor

Phone: 910-879-5554

Email: [email protected]

If this is a new primary contact, please list his/her graduate degree(s) and subject area(s)

M.Ed: Elementary Education, MSA: School Administration,

Ed.D: School Administration – Curriculum and Instruction

Secondary contact (for institutions with more than one accredited program, please add another row to the table if there are changes across programs):

Name

Title

Phone

Email

If this is a new secondary contact, please list his/her graduate degree(s) and subject area(s)

FormRev: 0819 5

B. REAFFIRMING THAT THE PROGRAM MEETS ACCREDITATION ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

In the chart below, please indicate compliance with the accreditation system’s eligibility requirements for all programs listed on p. 4.

Yes (for all programs

listed)

No (for one or more

programs listed)

The institution offering the degree program(s) is located in a U.S. state, district, or territory and currently accredited by a regional institutional accrediting agency that is recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) or the U.S. Department of Education.

X

The program(s) is not designated as “low-performing” by the state as outlined by Title II of the Higher Education Act.1

X

The program(s) is a specialized degree in early childhood or child development with at least 18 credit hours of early childhood coursework. This may include courses from other departments, such as Child Psychology, Sociology of the Family, or Children’s Literature if these courses are aligned with NAEYC accreditation standards and faculty are willing to participate in site visit interviews.

X

The program requires field experiences. X

The program(s) has graduated at least one individual. X

Associate degree programs: The faculty for the associate degree program(s)

includes a) at least one full-time faculty member whose primary

responsibilities are in the early childhood program(s) submitted for review and

b) who holds a graduate degree in early childhood education, child

development, child and family studies, or a related discipline with at least 18

graduate credits in early childhood/family studies. This faculty member must

serve as either the primary or secondary contact. One person may serve this

role in multiple programs.

Baccalaureate and master’s degree programs: The faculty for the baccalaureate and master’s degree program(s) includes a) at least one full-time faculty member whose primary responsibilities are in the early childhood program(s) submitted for review and b) who holds a terminal degree in early childhood education, child development, child and family studies, or a related discipline with at least 18 graduate credits in early childhood/family studies.

X

1Teacher licensure programs are required by the U.S. Department of Education to define criteria and procedures for identifying low-performing programs within the state. This requirement does not apply to early childhood programs that do not lead to teacher licensure.

FormRev: 0819 6

This faculty member must serve as either the primary or secondary contact. One person may serve this role for multiple programs.

Please explain any “no” answer above:

FormRev: 0819 7

C. UPDATES TO PROGRAM CONTEXT

Have there been any substantive changes to the program, as defined in the Accreditation Handbook?

X No ☐ Yes

If the program answered “yes”, please complete the “Notice of

Substantive Change Report” template found in the Online Accreditation Resource library and attach to your Annual Report.

Number of full-time candidates enrolled for the most recent semester2 available (do not include certificate-only students in counts)

33

Number of part-time candidates enrolled for the most recent semester3 available (do not include certificate-only students in counts)

20

The number of required early childhood credit hours in the program.

44

The number of required general education credit hours in the program.

22

The number of required non-early childhood education methodology and other education courses in the program.

0

Number of program graduates in past academic year i.e. the most recent one-year period for which institutional information is readily available (do not include certificate-only students in counts). The reporting period may be different for programs that submit Annual Reports to NAEYC on a spring vs. fall cycle but should be consistent for each year’s Annual Report.

10 (May 2019)

Number of full-time faculty who taught in the early childhood

1

2 If the institution uses a period other than semesters, substitute information from the most recent quarter or other relevant time period 3 If the institution uses a period other than semesters, substitute information from the most recent quarter or other relevant time period

FormRev: 0819 8

program(s) during the past academic year:

Number of part-time faculty who taught in the early childhood program(s) during the past academic year:

3

During the past year, has the program experienced unusual circumstances (e.g., natural disasters or health calamities) that are not reflected elsewhere in the report?

No X Yes

If the program answered “yes”, please provide a short explanation.

Due to Hurricane Florence in the Fall of 2018, some practicum hours and observations required in EDU courses were impacted. Many schools were closed for up to three weeks due to flooding and power outages affecting our students. Many students had to delay or reschedule their practicum/observations hours.

FormRev: 0819 9

D. REPORTING PROGRAM OUTCOME DATA

As part of the program’s achieving and maintaining NAEYC accreditation, it must report annually on at least three of the following measures and display these data via an easily located link on the program’s website.

The program is strongly encouraged to meet with its Institutional Research (IR) office to assist in gathering the data on the outcome measures. Below are suggested data reporting templates, but the program is encouraged to report the data in a format that best meets its program needs. For institutions with more than one accredited program, data must be disaggregated and reported for each program.

Outcome Measure #1: The Number of Program Completers

In the chart below, please indicate the number and percentage of program completers for the three most recent academic years. Note: the percentages across each row must add up to 100%.

Academic Year Number of program completers

% of program completers who were attending full-time (at the time of completion)

% of program completers who were attending part-time4 (at the time of completion)

2018-2019 10 (5) 50% (5) 50%

2017-2018 14 (6) 42% (8) 68%

2016-2017 8 (4) 50% (4) 50%

Outcome Measure #2: The Program Completion Rate

What is the published timeframe for full-time candidates to complete the early childhood program(s) included in this Self-Study Report? (Please indicate in terms of the number of academic years; e.g., five semesters would be 2.5 academic years.)____2 years________

In the following chart, please indicate the percentage of full-time candidates completing the program within the program's published timeframe.5The program must complete the information for the 150% indicator and choose to report on either the 100%, 200% (or twice) or 300% (three times) indicator. The academic years selected must fall within eight years of the date this report is submitted.

Example: A program with a published timeline of two years (four semesters at 15 credits a semester) to complete an A.A.S. in Early Childhood could select a Fall 2011 cohort on which to report. The 150% indicator,

4 Part-time status is defined by the institution. 5 “The Commission defines the published time frame as the number of terms an individual student was actually enrolled in the program. The terms do not have to be consecutive, but the total number of terms must meet the program’s expected time frame for completion. University-approved withdrawals (e.g., leaves of absence for reasons of health, maternity/paternity, mission work, military assignment) do not count toward the number of terms a student was enrolled in the program. Students taking longer due to reasons other than university-approved withdrawals (e.g., course repeats, remediation plans) cannot be considered as meeting completion expectations.” Language adapted from the Council on Academic Accreditation for Audiology, Speech Language Pathology of the American Speech Language Hearing Association athttp://caa.asha.org/news/calculating-program-completion-rates/.

http://caa.asha.org/news/calculating-program-completion-rates/

http://caa.asha.org/news/calculating-program-completion-rates/

FormRev: 0819 10

indicates all members of the Fall 2011 cohort (full-time at the time of enrollment) who completed the program by Spring 2014. The 100% indicator only contains members of the Fall 2011 cohort who completed the program by Spring 2013. The 200% indicator contains all members of the Fall 2011 cohort who completed the program by Spring 2015, including those already counted in the 150% indicator. Lastly, the 300% indicator contains all members of the Fall 2011 cohort who completed the program by Spring 2017, including those already counted in the 150% indicator.

Program Name: __Early Childhood Education, AAS___________________________

Academic year in which a Fall cohort of full-time candidates enrolled in the program (select three sequential years)

Percentage of those candidates who completed the program within 150% of the published timeframe

Percentage of those candidates who completed the program within 100%, 200% (twice) or 300% (three times) of the published timeframe (Please circle, underline or bold the indicator above on which the program will report.)

2017-2018 4 (28%) 3 (21%)

2016-2017 3 (14%) 2 (15)%

2015-2016 2 (12%) 1 (5)%

A program may (but is not required to) insert below a short narrative description (150 words) of the data reflected above to provide context.

Outcome Measure #3: Institutional Selected Data

All programs are required to select at least one of the following outcome measures on which to report. (Institutions submitting multiple programs in a single Annual Report may select the same or a different measure for each program; a separate chart must be submitted for each program.)

(A) The fall-to-fall retention rate in the program for each of the three most recently completed academic years

Academic Year % of Part-Time Candidates Enrolled in the

Program (% of Total Enrollment)

Retention Rate among Part-Time Candidates

% of Full-Time Candidates Enrolled in the

Program (% of Total Enrollment)

Retention Rate among Full-Time Candidates

2018-2019 32% 23% 67% 56%

2017-2018 44% 25% 55% 48%

2016-2017 58% 50% 41% 50%

OR

(B) The number and percentage of program graduates employed in the early childhood profession or pursuing further education in the profession within one year of graduation for each of the three most recent academic years for which information is available.

FormRev: 0819 11

Academic Year Number of Graduates Percentage of Graduates employed in the early

childhood profession within one year of graduation*

Percentage of Graduates pursuing further

education in the early childhood profession within one year of

graduation*

*The figures in these two columns do not need to add up to 100% OR

(C) Institutionally designed measure that speaks to candidate outcomes in the program (list the

measure and the data for the measure). The data must be reported for the most recent three

academic years. Such measures might include the average GPA of the graduating class, the number of candidates who completed their courses with a “C” or above, the pass rate on national

performance assessments such as edTPA, etc.

Academic Year Outcome Measure Performance Data

1) Please provide the specific web link where the data on Outcome Measures #1, #2 and #3 of this section

are published on the institution’s website. The link should be accessible from the program’s home page on the institution’s website. The data could be housed directly within the program’s section of the institution’s website. If an institution has a page that houses accreditation data and/or candidate success data for all programs at the institution, the program outcome measures may be included there instead, but must still be linked to directly from the program’s homepage.

___________________________________________________________

FormRev: 0819 12

E. REPORTING AND ANALYZING DATA FOR A STANDARD

For Section F, if the institution has more than one accredited program, please replicate and label the Key Assessment Title Chart and Chart of Key Assessments Aligned with Standards and Key Elements for each program if they do not share the same key assessments.

Key Assessment Title Chart Please list the names of each of the program’s key assessments in the chart below.

Name of Assessment Check here if the assessment is a revision or replacement for an assessment submitted in the previous Annual Report (or Self-Study Report, if the program is submitting a Year 1 Annual Report.

Key Assessment 1 Activity Plan

Key Assessment 2 Family Involvement Plan

Key Assessment 3 Child Development Case Study

Key Assessment 4 Childhood Disability Research Project

Key Assessment 5 Professional Portfolio

Key Assessment 6 (if applicable)*

* While submitting a sixth key assessment is encouraged in order to provide the most opportunity to demonstrate alignment with the standards, it is not a requirement. If a sixth assessment is included, it should meet the same requirements as the other assessments.

Chart of Key Assessments Aligned with Standards and Key Elements

Standard 1: Promoting Child Development and Learning

Key Elements

Key Assessment

1 2 3 4 5 6

1a. Knowing and understanding young’s children’s characteristics and needs, from birth through age 8.

X

1b. Knowing and understanding the multiple influences on development and learning. X

1c. Using developmental knowledge to create healthy, respectful, supportive, and challenging learning environments for young children.

X X

Standard 2: Building Family and Community Relationships

Key Elements

Key Assessment

1 2 3 4 5 6

2a. Knowing about and understanding diverse family and community characteristics. X

2b. Supporting and engaging families and communities through respectful, reciprocal relationships.

X

2c. Involving families and communities in young children’s development and learning. X X

FormRev: 0819 13

Standard 3: Observing, Documenting, and Assessing to Support Young Children and Families

Key Elements

Key Assessment

1 2 3 4 5 6

3a. Understanding the goals, benefits, and uses of assessment—including its use in development of appropriate goals, curriculum, and teaching strategies for young children.

X

3b. Knowing about and using observation, documentation, and other appropriate assessment tools and approaches, including the use of technology in documentation, assessment, and data collection.

X

3c. Understanding and practicing responsible assessment to promote positive outcomes for each child, including the use of assistive technology for children with disabilities.

X

3d. Knowing about assessment partnerships with families and with professional colleagues to build effective learning environments.

X

Standard 4: Using Developmentally Effective Approaches

Key Elements

Key Assessment

1 2 3 4 5 6

4a. Understanding positive relationships and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with young children.

X

4b. Knowing and understanding effective strategies and tools for early education, including appropriate uses of technology.

X

4c. Using a broad repertoire of developmentally appropriate teaching/learning approaches.

X

4d. Reflecting on own practice to promote positive outcomes for each child.

X

Standard 5: Using Content Knowledge to Build Meaningful Curriculum

Key Elements

Key Assessment

1 2 3 4 5 6

5a. Understanding content knowledge and resources in academic disciplines: language and literacy; the arts-music, creative movements, dance, drama, visual arts; mathematics; science, physical activity, physical education, health and safety; and social studies.

X

5b. Knowing and using the central concepts, inquiry tools, and structures of content areas or academic disciplines.

X

5c. Using own knowledge, appropriate learning standards, and other resources to design, implement, and evaluate developmentally meaningful, and challenging curriculum for each child.

X

Standard 6: Becoming a Professional

Key Elements

Key Assessment

1 2 3 4 5 6

6a. Identifying and involving oneself with the early childhood field. X X

6b. Knowing about and upholding ethical standards and other early childhood professional guidelines.

X

6c. Engaging in continuous, collaborative learning to inform practice; using technology effectively with young children, with peers, and as a professional resource.

X

FormRev: 0819 14

6d. Integrating knowledgeable, reflective, and critical perspectives on early education. X

6e. Engaging in informed advocacy for young children and the early childhood profession. X

If the program did not check a key assessment for every key element, please explain below.

FormRev: 0819 15

Reporting Data for a Standard

On which standard will the program report its two most recent applications of data? (Programs are encouraged to select a different standard for each Annual Report.) Please choose one: __ Standard 1 __ Standard 2 _X_ Standard 3 __ Standard 4 __ Standard 5 __ Standard 6 Which key assessments are used to measure this standard? (Please choose as many as are indicated on the chart as aligning with the selected standard.) __Key Assessment 1 X Key Assessment 2 X Key Assessment 3 __Key Assessment 4 X Key Assessment 5 __Key Assessment 6 Please do not attach the actual key assessments unless you are responding to conditions related to key assessments or if you indicated on p. 1 that this is a Year 4 Annual Report for which you are requesting feedback on key assessments. See Part H for more information. Looking collectively across all key assessments associated with the standard the program chose, include two applications6 of the most recent candidate performance data for this standard. If a key element is measured in more than one key assessment, programs can combine data from the two assessments or disaggregate data for each key assessment; however, data from different applications (dates) should not be combined. If submitting multiple programs in this Annual Report, this data must be disaggregated by program. Data tables should reflect data reported by the key elements within the standard. All data tables must clearly distinguish between how many degree candidates met or did not meet the standard. All data tables must clearly indicate which key assessments are included and the dates of application for each key assessment. NAEYC guidance can be found in the Accreditation Resource Library under “Guidance Documents and Other Resources.” Programs are encouraged to review the guidance when completing this section of the Annual Report.

Program name: Early Childhood Education, AAS

Date(s) of Application 1: Key Assessment 5, Fall 2018 (application 1), Spring 2019 (application 2) Date(s) of Application 1: Key Assessment 3, Fall 2018 Date(s) of Application 1: Key Assessment 2, Spring 2019 (application 1), Summer 2019 (application 2)

Key Elements of Standard x

Not Met Met Exceeds

Key Element 3a

KA 5

Application 1 N = 1 % = 17%






Key Element 3b

KA 5




6One “application” refers to one time the assessment was given. (Dates should be clear, distinct, and recent.)

FormRev: 0819 16




Key Element 3c

KA 3




Key Element 3d

KA 2







Data Analysis Questions After reviewing the data reported above, answer the following questions:

1. How are candidates performing in regard to the key elements of the standard on which the

program reported? Briefly describe each program’s data results across all key assessments designed to measure the standard chosen. (600 word limit) The overall performance rate for all standards in all 3 Key Elements was an acceptable 78%. Standard 3a & 3b which was assessed in the Key Assessment 5 (Practicum Portfolio) had the highest rate of success at 83% of students meeting or exceeding expectations. This assessment is part of the final course in our program, therefore, the expectation is for mastery. The lowest success rate was 70% in Key Element 3c. This standard was only assessed one time during the year in EDU 145 a first-semester course. The “Not Met” rating on this assessment is mainly contributed to 3 students not submitting the assignment. Again in the 1st application of Key Element 3d assessed in Key Assessment 2, two (2) students failed to submit the assignment. Class sizes at our school are typically small (9-15 students), failure to submit an assignment has a great effect on data reliability.

2. How is the program using the data from the standard to improve teaching and learning related to the standard? (Programs may want to note changes made to curriculum, field experiences, program delivery mode, sequencing of courses/field experiences, academic support provided to candidates, professional development offered to/required of faculty, etc.) (600 word limit)

The placement of Key Assessment 3 was changed after our first semester of disaggregating data using this assessment. The faculty had originally placed KA 3 within EDU 144 (Child Development I) which is taken during the 1st semester of the Early Childhood Program. After reviewing the data, the faculty decided to move the Key Assessment and place it within EDU 145 (Child Development II) in order to allow students an additional semester to practice and implement strategies to “involve families and communities in young children’s development and learning”.

If the data is disaggregated with only products submitted (removing the 2 students who did not submit the assignment) the success rate would be a more acceptable 83% in Key Element 3c and 100% in application 1 of Key Element 3d. This year we will continue to urge all students to submit all

FormRev: 0819 17

assignments. Both of these assignments are due at the end of the course which limits the time to “make-up” missed assignments.

F: STANDARD 7- FIELD EXPERIENCES

I affirm that (please select only one of the following):

1. The program’s field experiences remain as described in the field experience chart submitted with the most recent Self-Study Report or Annual Report, or field experiences have changed in a way that do not reflect a substantive change as defined in the Accreditation Handbook.

OR

2. Substantive changes have occurred since the program’s most recent report submission. (Please

complete the “notice of substantive change report” in the online accreditation resource library.)

In order to meet Standard 7, a program must provide opportunities for all candidates to observe and practice with at least two age groups (birth-age 3, 3-5 years old, and 5-8 years old) in at least two settings (Head Start program, early school grades, early learning centers, or home-based settings). Institutions with multiple accredited programs must complete the information below separately for each program. Total number of field experience hours required in this program: __162______

In which age groups do all of your candidates have an opportunity to observe (must select at least two to meet Standard 7)? Birth-age 3 Age 3-5 Age 5-8

In which age groups do all of your candidates have an opportunity to practice (must select at least two to meet Standard 7)? Birth-age 3 Age 3-5 Age 5-8

In which settings do all of your candidates have an opportunity to observe (Must select at least two to meet Standard 7)? Head Start (or state equivalent) programs Early school grades Early learning centers Home-based settings

In which settings do all of your candidates have an opportunity to practice (Must select at least two to meet Standard 7)? Head Start (or state equivalent) programs Early school grades Early learning centers Home-based settings

X

2019 Revised Template

IF YOUR PROGRAM IS NOT RESPONDING TO CONDITIONS AND IS NOT SUBMITTING A YEAR 4 ANNUAL REPORT, PLEASE GO TO THE

ANNUAL REPORT COMPLETION CHECKLIST PAGE TO COMPLETE THE ANNUAL REPORT.


19

G. RESPONSE TO CONDITIONS IN ACCREDITATION DECISION

If the program is accredited with conditions, please complete this section. If the program is not responding to conditions, do not complete this section.

1. Cite the condition statement(s) here exactly as it appears in the Accreditation Decision Report.

2. Describe the progress in addressing the condition(s). Description of work to date is important, but assertion of change is not sufficient. Insert documents, such as revised key assessments or data tables and analysis that provide evidence of change. Programs that are accredited with conditions must satisfactorily address conditions by the second Annual Report in order to maintain accreditation.


20

H. YEAR 4 PROGRAM SUBMITTING KEY ASSESSMENTS FOR REVIEW

If the program is submitting a Year 4 Annual Report and is submitting key assessments for review, please complete this section. Programs in Year 4 are not required to use this service. If the program is not submitting a Year 4 Annual Report, do not complete this section.

Programs can submit up to two key assessments that measure the Standard on which they submitted data in Section F.

On which standard did the program report its two most recent applications of data in this Annual Report?

☐ Standard 1

☐ Standard 2 X Standard 3

☐ Standard 4

☐ Standard 5

☐ Standard 6 Please indicate which key assessments that measure this standard you are including for review (select up to two).

☐ Key Assessment 1 X Key Assessment 2 X Key Assessment 3

☐ Key Assessment 4

☐ Key Assessment 5

☐ Key Assessment 6 Please include in this Annual Report up to two Key Assessments (instructions to candidates and rubrics) that measure this standard.


21

Annual Report Completion Checklist

This checklist is meant to be a guide. Completing it is not a requirement of the Annual Report.

X The two-page cover sheet, is complete including the check box for the appropriate year of the Annual Report.

X Section A contains all relevant contact information. If new contacts are listed the program has provided the graduate degrees (and subject areas) that they hold

X The program has affirmed compliance with eligibility requirements in Section B. and provided a narrative explanation in cases where it is not compliant.

X In Section C the program has completed the table providing updates to program context.

X In Section D the program has reported program outcome data on three measures and has provided a web link on the institution’s website where the data is published.

X In Section E the program has indicated whether there has been a substantive change(s) to the program(s) and attached the Substantive Change Report form if needed.

X In Section E the program has indicated continued compliance with Standard 7 (Field Experiences).

X The program has completed the key assessment Title Chart and Chart of Key Assessments Aligned with Standards and Key Elements in Section F for all accredited programs.

X In Section F, the program has indicated on which standard it is submitting candidate performance data, included a data table, and answered the data analysis questions.

If the Annual Report includes multiple programs, the program has disaggregated the data in Section F by program.

X Each data table included in Section F is clearly labeled to indicate which key assessments are included and the dates for each application of data.

If the program is accredited with conditions, it has submitted evidence of addressing conditions in Section G.

X If the program is submitting a Year 4 Annual Report and wants to have its key assessments reviewed, it has completed Section H.

What to Expect After Submitting an Annual Report

Once the program submits its Annual Report, NAEYC will acknowledge receiving the report.

NAEYC will then review it for completeness. If the review finds that all items are complete, then the program will be notified that its Annual Report has been accepted. Programs can expect to hear back from NAEYC within ten weeks.

If the report is missing information or NAEYC has clarifying questions, NAEYC staff will ask for the necessary data. If the program does not comply with the information request, it will be placed on Administrative Probation.

If the program is responding to conditions in its Annual Report, the Commission will review the evidence submitted. In most cases, the program should plan to receive feedback on its conditions prior to the end of the year (if submitting during the fall


22

cycle) or by mid-summer (if submitting in the spring cycle); in some cases the program may be notified that it has been placed on a subsequent Commission agenda.

If the program submitted a Year 4 Annual Report and submitted Key Assessments for review, it should expect feedback on key assessments during the winter (if submitting during the fall cycle) or summer (if submitting during the spring cycle).


23

Assessment 2: Creating a Family Involvement Plan

PLAN – Understand the assignment and objectives

This family involvement plan requires candidates to create several documents that will

assist with building relationships and involving families in their children’s development

and learning in order to ensure student success.

NAEYC Standards that will be addressed:

NAEYC Standard 2: Building Family and Community Relationships

2a: Knowing about and understanding diverse family and community

characteristics (Parent Survey)

2b: Supporting and empowering families and communities through

respectful, reciprocal relationships

2c: Involving families and communities in their child’s development and

learning

NAEYC Standard 4: Using Developmentally Effective Approaches to Connect

with Children and Families

4a: Understanding positive relationships and supportive interactions as the

foundation of their work with children (Parent Involvement Policy)

NAEYC Standard 6: Becoming a Professional 6a: Identifying and involving oneself with the early childhood field

Supportive Skill 2: Mastering and applying foundational concepts from

general education

Supportive Skill 3: Written and verbal skills

The written product will be evaluated using the Family Involvement Plan Rubric.

Due Date:

Points Possible:

PREPARE – Gather information and resources for the assignment.

Review Chapter ? in your textbook.

Refer to notes from class.

Access to a word processing program.

Create a work schedule checklist for completing the project.

Assignment Section Requirements Personal Due Date

Parent Survey Involvement

opportunities


2

At least 10 open-

ended questions

Parent Involvement Policy Philosophy

Strategies

Opportunities

Newsletter Program News

Classroom News

Special Events

Article

Contributions

List of Resources At least 10 resources

Name

Location

Contact Information

Description

Conference Agenda Draft – list of

components and time

Share with parent

Add edits

PRACTICE -

a. Parent Survey

Develop a survey that would be given to parents of children in an early childhood program that

addresses parent involvement in the classroom. The survey should include types of involvement

opportunities that may be selected, as well as open-ended questions to obtain parent ideas for

involvement. The survey should include a minimum of ten questions that captures parents' interest in

being involved, their availability, and the level of ongoing commitment to the classroom.

b. Parent Involvement Policy

Use a word processing program, outline a policy that addresses parent involvement in your early

childhood program. The policy should include the program's philosophy regarding parental participation

as well as strategies that the program employs to promote active involvement of parents. Opportunities

for involvement should be addressed including parent visits, volunteerism, and advisory roles of parents.

c. Newsletter

Using a word processing program or Microsoft Publisher create a newsletter for your program. Include

the following information:

o Program news

o Classroom news

o Special events – Opportunities for parental involvement

o Brief article on a child development topic

o Contributions (art work, story, etc.) by children


3

Remember to make the newsletter appealing to parents, using art work and color as well as an easy-to-

read format.

d. Useful Resources and Services for Family Members

Using the Internet, phone book, and personal references, students will prepare a list of services,

resources, and facilities (minimum of 10) located in the community that could provide support for

families and children (Department of Social Services, Partnership for Children, etc). The list should

include the name of the service/resource/facility, location and contact information (email, website,

phone number). In addition, provide a brief description of how the service/resource/facility will

provide possible support for families and children.

e. Parent-Teacher Conference Agenda

Using a word processing program, prepare an agenda or plan for a parent-teacher conference. Include

the components that will be addressed in the conference, such as welcoming the parents, allowing time

for feedback, and developing goals. Be sure to indicate the approximate length of time that will be spent

on each component. The plan should reflect a conference that will last approximately 30 minutes. Share

a draft of the conference agenda with the family of a young child for input. Describe edits that

were incorporated as a result of the family’s advice.

PRODUCE

Submit the final product (explain how).

Follow the rubric to earn the highest points.


4

Family Involvement Plan Rubric

NAEYC Standard

Key Elements Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations

Not Acceptable


2a: Knowing about and understanding diverse family and community characteristics

Student designed a family survey that includes 10 clearly written questions, which will provide information about the parent/guardian’s interests for being involved, availability and level of commitment to the classroom.

Student designed a family survey that includes 10 somewhat clearly written questions, which will provide information about the parent/guardian’s interests for being involved, availability and level of commitment to the classroom.

Student designed a parent survey that does not include questions that will provide information about the parent/guardian’s interests for being involved, availability and level of commitment to the classroom. .

Unacceptable or no submission

15 12 8 0


2b. Supporting and empowering families and communities through respectful, reciprocal relationships

Student outlined a policy that clearly addresses parent involvement. In addition to the following (program’s philosophy regarding parent participation, strategies that promote active involvement and opportunities for involvement), the student incorporated information that promotes the importance of relationships between parents and teachers.

Student outlined a policy that somewhat addresses parent involvement. The policy included the following: program’s philosophy regarding parent participation, strategies that promote active involvement and opportunities for involvement).

Student outlined a policy that clearly addresses parent involvement. In addition to the following (program’s philosophy regarding parent participation, strategies that promote active involvement and opportunities for involvement), the student incorporated additional information that promotes the importance of relationships between parents and teachers.


20 16 10 0

Standard 4: Using Developmentally Effective Approaches to Connect with Children and Families

4a: Understanding positive relationships and supportive interactions as the foundation of their work with children

Student created a parent/teacher conference agenda that is related to the developmental goals of children. The agenda is limited to 30 minutes, provides times for goal developing, teacher and parent input, summary of meeting and plans for the next conference

Student created a parent/teacher conference agenda that is somewhat related to the developmental goals of children. The agenda is limited to 30 minutes, provides times for goal developing, teacher and parent input, summary of meeting and plans for the next conference

Student did not incorporate a parent/teacher conference agenda that is related to the developmental goals of children. The agenda is limited to 30 minutes, provides times for goal developing, teacher and parent input, summary of meeting and plans for the next conference.


15 12 8 0


2c. Involving families and communities in their child’s development and learning.

Newsletter was well organized and included information in addition to the required components (program news, classroom news, special events-opportunities for parental involvement, article on childcare development topic & student work samples) that involve parents/community members in child’s development. Additional items may include, but are not limited to, newsletter written in different languages, questions that promote 2-way communication, additional links to helpful articles, etc.

Newsletter was well organized and included all required components (program news, classroom news, special events (opportunities for parental involvement), article on childcare development topic & student work samples.

Newsletter was somewhat organized and did not contain all required components (program news, classroom news, special events – opportunities for parent involvement, article on childcare development topic & student work samples.


15 12 8

Standard 6: Becoming a Professional

6a. Identifying and involving oneself with the early childhood field

Student included 10 or more clearly identified (all contact information & a brief description) services/resources/facilities that will provide support for families and children. Student provided an explanation of how each of the identified services/resources/facilities will benefit children and families.

The student identifies and involves oneself with the early childhood field as evidenced in the inclusion of 10 somewhat completely identified (contact information & a brief description) services/resources/facilities that will provide support for families and children. A brief description of the identified services/resources/facilities

The student fails to identify and involve oneself with the early childhood field as evidenced by failure to include services/resources/facilities that will provide support for families and children


15 12 8 0


5

Supportive Skill SSS 2: Mastering and applying foundational concepts from general education

Final product demonstrates mastery of most general education outcomes (effective communication skills, utilizes basic computer skills, employs critical thinking skills to analyze problems and reach logical conclusions, recognizes and demonstrates appropriate social or professional behaviors within the discipline)

Final product somewhat demonstrates mastery of general education outcomes (effective communication skills, utilizes basic computer skills, employs critical thinking skills to analyze problems and reach logical conclusions, recognizes and demonstrates appropriate social or professional behaviors within the discipline)

Fails to demonstrate mastery of general education outcomes


10 7 5 0

Supportive Skill SSS 3: Written and verbal skills

The student applies strong written skills evidenced by showing minimal spelling and grammatical errors in the final product.

The student applies acceptable written skills evidenced by showing less than 6 spelling or grammatical errors in the final product

The student applies poor written skills evidenced by numerous spelling or grammatical errors in the final product


10 7 5 0


6

Key Assignment 3

EDU 144/145 Child Development I & II

Assessment 3: Assessment of Promoting Child Development and Learning: Case Study

1. A brief description of the assessment and its use in the program

The case study requires candidates to study a child from birth to 2 ½ years old and prepare a report that describes

the child, their development in the four domains (physical, cognitive, social/emotional and language) and makes

recommendations of developmentally appropriate activities to build on the child’s present level of development.

Your knowledge of theories of child development and learning should be integrated throughout this assignment.

You will:

Select a child from age birth to 5 years old.

Interview the child’s family in order to obtain key information (family background, child growth,

language and social characteristics). Note any important goals or concerns from the family.

Observe the child for at least 45 minutes and complete the Disease and Prevention Milestone

Checklists available from http://www.cdc.gov/NCBDDD/actearly/milestones/index.html as an

observation tool.

Define three (3) learning activities/actions that will be supportive and challenging to the child

using the information you obtained from the interview and observation.

NAEYC Standards that will be addressed:

NAEYC STANDARD 1: Promoting Child Development and Learning 1a. Knowing and understanding young children’s characteristics and needs

NAEYC STANDARD 2: Building Family and Community Relationships

2c. Involving families and communities in their children’s development and learning

NAEYC STANDARD 3: Observing, Documenting and Assessing to Support Young Children and

Families

3c. Understanding and practicing responsible assessment to promote positive outcomes for each child

Supportive Skill 4: Making connections between prior knowledge/experience and new learning

Project Instructions:

The student will select a child (ages birth to 5 years-old) to observe in an early childhood setting. The

student should obtain permission from the child’s parent and interview the parent on family background, child

growth, language and social attributes before completing the observation. The student will observe the child for

a minimum of 45 minutes and take notes on the child’s development in the four developmental domains

(physical, cognitive, social/emotional and language). Students are encouraged to use the Center for Disease and

Prevention Milestone Checklists available from http://www.cdc.gov/NCBDDD/actearly/milestones/index.html

as an observation tool.

After the observation has been completed the student will write a 2 page, double-spaced paper with 12 point

font, including the following:

Background of the child (age, health background, home environment)

One paragraph on the child’s development in each domain

o Physical Development

http://www.cdc.gov/NCBDDD/actearly/milestones/index.html

http://www.cdc.gov/NCBDDD/actearly/milestones/index.html


7

Characteristics - appearance, height, weight, body proportions, and size

Health – record of attendance, illnesses, vitality, fatigue (indicate source of

information)

Nutrition – food habits, meals, snacks, etc…

Level of Independence with toileting routines, etc…

Motor Coordination – large and small muscle skills\

o Intellectual Development:

Evidence of learning – note concepts the child understands

Language – spoken/written

Evidence of desire to learn

Interest/Motivators in various areas of the early childhood setting

Evidence and identification of learning styles (Where they utilized and supported

by the childcare provider? If so, please explain how.)

o Social Development:

Interactions with children and adults (How does the child relate to others?)

Ability to share and take turns

Describe level of participation in routines/activities

Describe prosocial behavior including any behavioral management factors that

may influence the child’s learning (If you observed these factors being managed,

please share your observation.)

Suggestions of developmentally appropriate activities that building on the child’s current level of

development for the parents

Developmentally appropriate practices should be tied to theories or professional standards

The written product will be evaluated with the Case Study Rubric


Edu 144 – Child Development I Case Study Rubric

NAEYC Standard

Key Elements Exceeds Expectations

Meets Expectations

Does Not Meet Expectations

Not Acceptable

Standard 1 Promoting Child Development and Learning

1a. Knowing and understanding young children’s characteristics and needs

The student knows and understands young children’s characteristics and needs as evidenced by documenting child’s development in all (4) domains (physical, cognitive, social/emotional and language) and adequately addresses the (4) W’s (who, what, when and where)

The student knows and understands young children’s characteristics and needs as evidenced by documenting child’s development in (2-3) domains (physical, cognitive, social/emotional and language) and adequately addresses the (2-3) W’s (who, what, when and where)

The student knows and understands young children’s characteristics and needs as evidenced by documenting child’s development in (1) domains (physical, cognitive, social/emotional and language) and adequately addresses the (1) W’s (who, what, when and where)

Unacceptable or no

submission

15 10 5 0

Standard 2 Building Family and Community Relationships

2c. Involving families and communities in their children’s development and learning

The student involves families and communities in their children’s development and learning as evidenced by sharing and interpreting at least 4 detailed characteristics of the child gained from the parent interview focusing on the child’s current level of development

The student involves families and communities in their children’s development and learning as evidenced by sharing 2 or more detailed characteristics gained from the parent interview focusing on the child’s current level of development.

The student involves families and communities in their children’s development and learning as evidenced by sharing little or no evidence of involvement with the family

Unacceptable or no

submission

15 10 5 0

Standard 3 Observing, Documenting and Assessing to Support Young Children and Families

3c. Understanding and practicing responsible assessment to promote positive outcomes for each child

The student understands and practices responsible assessment to promote positive outcomes for each child evidenced by a detailed objective observation including documentation of all (4) domains and sharing DAP strategies with teachers/parents

The student understands and practices responsible assessment to promote positive outcomes for each child evidenced by a detailed observation including documentation of (2-3) domains and sharing DAP strategies with teachers/parents

The student understands and practices responsible assessment to promote positive outcomes for each child evidenced by a detailed observation including documentation of at least 1 domain and sharing DAP strategies with teachers/parents

Unacceptable or no

submission

15 10 5 0

Supportive Skill

SSS. 4 Making connections between prior knowledge/experience and new learning

The student makes connections between prior knowledge /experiences and new learning evidenced by making (3) references

The student makes connections between prior knowledge /experiences and new learning evidenced by making

The student makes connections between prior knowledge /experiences and new learning evidenced by making (1) reference to

Unacceptable or no

submission


9

to prior knowledge, theory or professional standards /research

(2) references to prior knowledge, theory or professional standards /research

prior knowledge, theory or professional standards /research

15 10 5 0