Top Banner
INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART nathan brandt + kendall clarke + cyndee moody + briana strickland
35

INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ARTfaculty.arch.tamu.edu/anichols/courses/applied...gallery floor trusses; w-tee chords, double angle webs foundation slab steel w section beams and columns

Jul 15, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART

    nathan brandt + kendall clarke + cyndee moody + briana strickland

  • BACKGROUNDtypology: museumarchitect: diller scofidio + renfro (ds+r)structural engineer: new york city office of aruplocation: boston, massachusettscompletion date: 2006area: 65,000 sf

  • THE ARCHITECTSelizabeth diller, ricardo scofidio, and charles renfrofounded in 1979integrates architecture, the visual arts, and the performing artsperry dean rogers acted as associate architect

  • THE SITElocated on harbor walk, a 47-mile long public walkwayPritzker family donated .75-acre site for civic uselargest private development on south boston waterfront

  • THE SITE

    ICA

    located on harbor walk, a 47-mile long public walkwayPritzker family donated .75-acre site for civic uselargest private development on south boston waterfront

  • THE SITE

  • THE SITEpeak ground acceleration map - 2014

  • THE SITE

  • DESIGN CONCEPT

    harbor walkpublic space

    intimate gallery spaces

    harbor walk seen as civic surfaceextends up to form public space and wraps around the theaterwaterfront as asset and distraction

  • harbor walkpublic space

    intimate gallery spaces

    DESIGN CONCEPT

  • DESIGN CONCEPTground level floor planlobby, bookstore, dining, food prep, loading zone, art lab

  • DESIGN CONCEPT

  • DESIGN CONCEPTsecond level floor plantheater, theater support, offices, classrooms

  • DESIGN CONCEPT

  • DESIGN CONCEPTthird level floor plantheater, offices

  • DESIGN CONCEPT

  • DESIGN CONCEPTfourth level floor plangalleries

  • DESIGN CONCEPT

  • STRUCTURE structural systemsteel as structural systemeasy to transport and assemble; cantilever

  • STRUCTUREinverted triangularroof trusses

    steel w sectionmegatrusses

    gallery floor trusses;w-tee chords, doubleangle webs

    foundation slab

    steel w section beamsand columns withlateral bracing

    piles, pile caps, andbeam grillage

  • STRUCTUREroof area load = 50 psfgallery floor area load = 100 psfmember forces and moments

    revit analysis

  • STRUCTURE

    Top offooting

    1 ft 3¹/ 8 in.

    W12X40

    W12X50

    W12X40W14X233 W12X40 W12X65

    W12X65 W12X65W12X65 W12X65 W12X65W12X65

    W14X109

    Top of footings and grade beamsat -2 ft on grid A8, typical

    Top of footing -2 ft

    W12X45W12X45

    W12X40

    W14X193

    W14X193

    W14X193

    W14X193W14X311

    W14X193

    W12X40

    W12X40

    Top of trench -1 ft

    4 in.

    Top of trench -1 ft

    4 in. W12X40W12X40

    W12X40W12X40W12X40W12X58W12X58

    W12X40W12X58W14X398

    W12X40W12X58W12X65 W12X65W12X65

    W12X53W12X53

    W12X53W14X550

    W12X53W12X40W12X53W12X53

    To p offooting-5 ft 8 in.

    Top offooting -5 ft

    To p offooting5 ft 8 in.

    To p offooting-5 ft 8 in.

    To p offooting5 ft 8 in.

    Top offooting

    5 ft

    To p offooting5 ft 8 in.

    Top offooting

    5 ft

    Top offooting

    -5 ft

    To p offooting5 ft 8 in.

    Top offooting

    5 ft

    Top offooting

    -5 ft

    Top offooting

    1 ft 3¹/ 8 in.

    Top offooting

    -1 ft 3¹/ 8 in.

    Top offooting

    1 ft 3¹/- 8 in.

    Top offooting

    -2 ft

    Top offooting

    1 ft 3¹/-- 8 in.

    Top offooting

    -2 ft

    Top offooting

    -2 ftTop offooting

    1 ft 3¹/ 8 in.

    Top offooting

    -2 ftTop of

    footing-2 ft

    Top ofgrade beam

    2 ft

    Top ofgrade beam

    -2 ftTop of

    footings and grade beams

    at 2 ft on grid 1, typical

    Top offootings and grade beams

    at -2 ft on grid 1, typical

    Gradebeam 2

    Gradebeam 2

    W12X50 W12X50

    Floordrains

    Floorboxes

    Light�xtures

    Top of slab +0 ft

    0 in.

    Top of slab -2 in.

    Top of slab1 ft 6 in.

    Top of slab-1 ft 6 in.

    Top offooting -5 ft

    Top ofgradebeam

    4 ft 4 in.

    Top ofgradebeam

    4 ft 4 in.

    Top ofgradebeam

    -4 ft 4 in.Top of

    slab -3 ftTop of

    slab +0 ft0 in.

    Top ofgradebeam

    -8½ in.

    Top ofgradebeam

    3½ in.

    Top ofgradebeam

    3½ in.

    Top ofgradebeam½ in.

    Top ofgradebeam-½ in.

    Top ofgradebeam2 in.

    Top ofgradebeam+2 in.

    Top ofgrade

    beam 2 ft

    Braced frameBraced frame

    Braced frameBraced frame

    Braced frame

    Braced frame

    Braced frame

    Braced frame

    Braced frameBraced frame

    foundation framing

  • STRUCTURE foundation systemsteel H-Piles

    H 14 x 117100 feet longcathodic protection

    concrete pile caps and grillage

  • STRUCTURE soil typeudorthents - urban land soil

    2-20 feet of artificial fillloamy soil

    ~10% clay~40% silt~50% sand

  • STRUCTURE soil typesteel h-piles on bedrock for higher bearing capacity

    stability concern for designwater table at 3-5 feet + frost condition

    water tableartificial fill

    clayey sand vertical bearing capacity: 2,000 psf lateral bearing pressure: 150 psf

    bedrock vertical bearing capacity: 12,000 psf lateral bearing pressure: 1,200 psf

  • STRUCTURE soil pressure

    single pile

    group

    highly stressed area

  • STRUCTURE wind load design140 mph

    horiztontal load: 31.1 psf windward corner of buildingvertical load: -37.3 psf windward corner of roof

  • STRUCTURE seismic load designZone 2A: 0.15Occupancy factor: 1.0Structure Response (Rw): 12 (moment resisting frame)

  • STRUCTURE multiframe analysisexterior bay

    tributary area: 3,380 square feetroof live load: 20 psf + roof snow load: 30 psffloor live load: 100 psf

    axial loads shear

    wLL:169 k/ft

    moment deflection

    wLL: 338 k/ft

  • STRUCTURE multiframe analysis

    tributary area: 3,380 square feetroof live load: 20 psf + roof snow load: 30 psffloor live load: 100 psf

    interior bay

    axial loads shear

    moment deflection

    wLL: 295.75 k/ft wLL: 581k/ft

  • STRUCTURE multiframe analysis

    east facade tributary area: 3,420 square feet

    south facadewind load: 31.1 psf

    106.3 k

    shearaxial loads

    moment deflection

  • STRUCTURE load transferlateral force on eastern side would transfer load to exteriormegatruss

  • STRUCTUREfloor load transfer

    roof load transfer

    load transfer

  • REFERENCESBoston Parks and Recreation Department. Appendix 1 Environmental Inventory and Analysis. Soils. Retrieved November 29, 2014, from http://www.cityofboston.gov/parks/pdfs/os7a_text.pdf.

    Boston Parks and Recreation Department. City of Boston General Soils. Retrieved November 29, 2014, from http://www.cityofboston.gov/parks/pdfs/soil.pdf.

    Commonwealth of Massachusetts. (2001). Structural Loads. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/massachusetts/hazards.php.

    Diller, Scofidio, and Renfro. n.d. Institute of Contemporary Art. Retrieved from http://www.dsrny.com/#/projects/ica.

    United States Department of Agriculture. (1989). Soil Survey of Norfolk and Suffolk Counties, Massachusetts. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/massachusetts/MA616/0/norfolk.pdf.

    n.d. Google Images. http://www.google.com/imghp?gws_rd=ssl.

    [Graph illustration] Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-5TfYu3ie_8s/ULZX6h0OPQI/AAAAAAAABho/LlJyfE2kMxE/s1600/10.gif.

    ICA Istitute of contemporary art, Diller Scofidio Renfro. (n.d.). Retrieved December 1, 2014, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-mMzV9qPYs.

    International Building Code. (2009). Soils and Foundations. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/massachusetts/hazards.php.

    Nichols, Anne. (2014). Applied Architectural Structures Course Note Set.

    Phipps, Donald. (1962). The Geology of the Unconsolidated Sediments of Boston Harbor. Massachusetts. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Schodek, D., & Bechthold, M. (n.d.). Structures (Seventh ed., p. 161). Pearson.

    Schulte, M. and Tavolaro, M. (March 2008). Reaching Out. Civil Engineering, 78, 3, p. 44-51.

    Soil Mechanics Network Classroom. Element Stress Analysis. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/massachusetts/hazards.php.

    Tavolaro, M. (2008, March 1). Reaching Out. Civil Engineering, 44-51.

    U.S. Geological Survey. (2014). 2014 Seismic Hazard Map. Retrieved November 30, 2014, from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/states/massachusetts/hazards.php.