Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science SCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT Climate/Atmospheric Science & HPC: Unravelling the Past, Understanding the Present and Predicting the Future Alan M. Haywood
Dec 16, 2015
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric ScienceSCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT
Climate/Atmospheric Science & HPC: Unravelling the Past, Understanding the
Present and Predicting the Future
Alan M. Haywood
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science (ICAS)
ICAS one of four research institutes in the School of Earth & Environment
120 Staff and Researchers5 Research Groups: Atmospheric Dynamics Cloud Microphysics Atmospheric Chemistry Atmospheric Aerosol Climate Change and Impacts
Research with High Performance Computing
Research philosophy involves bringing together:
Theory Observations Numerical modelling
ARC1 is a key research tool.
Daily Weather Analysis, Research and Forecasting
Steven Pickering and Andrew Ross
• Performing daily weather forecasts across the UK and Europe• Used in meteorology teaching modules• Developing case studies of high impact events (hurricanes)• Providing forecasts for land based research projects• Monitoring and analysis of extreme weather events• Comparing simulated and observational weather data
Hypothesis for cause of collapse :Most rapidly warming region on the planet - 3.4°C/century Changes to circumpolar flow in recent decades have altered the wind patterns of the Antarctic PeninsulaMore frequent episodes of flow ‘over’ instead of flow ‘around’ the PeninsulaWarm/dry westerly down slope winds generated by mountains Warm/dry air across ice shelf!Modified wind regimes have altered climate of Peninsula
Collapse of the Larsen B ice shelf during summer 2002
-Very limited observations available to verify hypothesis -Larsen C ice shelf now at risk- Intense field campaign undertaken in Jan / Feb 2011 to gain more understanding of the mechanisms driving climate change and warming of Antarctic Peninsula
Strengthening circumpolar westerly flow
Weather forecasting for the Orographic Flow and the Climate of the Antarctic Peninsula (OFCAP) field projectVictoria Smith, Steven Pickering, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian
Role of ARC1: Weather forecasts for planning research flights
Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model run daily on ARC1
Highly sophisticated computer model High resolution (1.5 km) required 60 hour forecast every day
HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING NEEDED IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE
NECESSARY DAILY FORECASTS
First use of ARC1’s advanced reservation facility
144 cpu’s set aside each night between 8pm and 8am
Forecast products copied to Rothera, Antarctica and weather forecast given at 8:30 am (11:30 UK time)
Outer domain of model7.5 km horizontal resolution
Inner domain of model1.5 km horizontal resolution
Larsen C Ice Shelf
Rothera research base
Automatic weather stations
Example forecast products from OFCAP
Westerly synoptic flow driving cyclogenesis in lee of peninsula
and easterly cross Peninsula flow further south
Foehn clearly forecast in temperature plot along 68S
west of Peninsula
Cross-peninsula easterly driving strong jets from Fjords on western side of Peninsula
Extremely successful use of the ARC1 computer cluster and it’s new advanced reservation facility
ARC1 facility shown to be reliable enough and able to dedicate the resources needed to support field campaign
Global Aerosol ModellingKen Carslaw, Graham Mann, Domninick Spracklen, Kirsty Pringle + 5
postdocs + 5 PhD students
Small particles in the atmosphere (aerosol) play an important, but uncertain, role on weather, climate and human health.
Some aerosol are formed naturally (e.g. dust and sea salt) and others as a result of pollution
At Leeds we developed a global aerosol model (GLOMAP) to better understand how these particles are formed, and how they behave in the atmosphere.
GLOMAP has been implemented in both the Met Office Unified Model (as part of the UKCA project) and the European Centre for Long Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) model.
Use of ARC1
GLOMAP is a very diverse group with interests in: volcanoes, cosmic rays, geoengineering, atmosphere-biosphere interactions, cloud formation, dust storms
and many more...
The overall group philosophy is to:
• Test complex and simplified parameterisations to decide what level of complexity is required.
• Run simulations at the same time as field campaigns to evaluate our model against observations.
• Try to identify and parameterize additional processes required to correctly simulate atmospheric aerosol
High performance computing allows us to include more processes, and in more detail
We receive funding from: the National Environmental Research Council, the European Union and the National Centre for Atmospheric Science
The GLOMAP aerosol model simulates the mass and number of different types of particle, including mineral dust.
Satellite image of dust blown from the Sahara over the ocean
GLOMAP model simulation of dust aerosol particles
Ground based observations
Process understanding and model evaluation
By comparing to a range of different observations we can
better understand the processes which are well /
badly treated in the model.
This leads to a better understanding of the processes involved
GLOMAP will provide additional model support to the FENNEC field campaign taking place this June
in the Sahara
Emissions and processing: the impact of volcanoes on climate
In 1783 the Laki volcanoerupted in Iceland - one of the largest flood lava
eruptions in recent history.
Previous studies have used a very simple treatment of the aerosol microphysics to model volcanic aerosol.
In Leeds, PhD student Anja Schmidt used GLOMAP run on the ARC1 computer to model the effect of the Laki eruption on aerosol and climate
SO2
Sulfate aerosol
particles
Volcanoes produce aerosol particles which reflect solar radiation and cool the climate.
Transported throughout the
atmosphere
Inventory and Stability of Marine Methane HydratesAlan Haywood and Stephen Hunter
Water cages that efficiently trap methane (150x density than STP)
Concentrated methane store + widespread – energy industry interest
Anthropogenic warming – submarine inventory may begin to disassociate
Methane strong GH gas + poses potential geohazard (submarine land slides) + ocean acidification
4x1018 g CH4
3000 GT Carbon
Previous estimates of the global inventory
Cascadia Margin
Model Evaluation
Blake Ridge
Modelling the Steady State Inventory
Hydrate mass = ~ 4700 to 5030 Pg C for present-day
Dynamism
Predicted bottom water temperature anomalies and ice sheet extent (↑) 6 ka ( )↗ LGM and (→) 120 ka
How does the global hydrate inventory respond to the changing bottom water conditions and sea-level change?
Blake Ridge example – test case
Grand Challenge Science – Simulating Glacial Cycles
Petit et al. (1999) Nature.
-24
-21
-18
-15
-12
-9
-6
-3
0
3
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Regional Temperature Anomalies
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
SA
T anom
(°C)
SA
T a
nom
(°C
)
Ice core data: thanks to Valerie Masson-Delmotte
Time kyr BP
ARC1 is doing what it said
on the tin – capacity
But…it has also become
something extraordinary…
It is my capability service…
Ending on a personal note