1 INSPIRE THEMATIC WORKING GROUP INSPIRE THEMATIC WORKING GROUP Production and Industrial Production and Industrial Facilities (PF) Facilities (PF) Edinburgh, Scotland 30 June 2011
Jan 14, 2016
1
INSPIRE THEMATIC WORKING GROUPINSPIRE THEMATIC WORKING GROUP
Production and Industrial Facilities (PF)Production and Industrial Facilities (PF)
Edinburgh, Scotland
30 June 2011
2
The group
Heinrich “Level of detail”Geerling
Claudia “THE Editor” Pegoraro
Antonello “IPPC” Navarretta
Angel “Tres Sombreros” Lopez
Andrea“what’s your main occupation”
Giacomelli
FACILITATOR
EDITOR (2010) / P.O.CEDITOR (From Feb 2010)
EXPERT
EXPERT
3
Input
1. User survey documents + core INSPIRE reference material
2. Expert-derived documents(directly used by experts in their other job
or from their contacts)
3. Other EU projects
4INSPIRE progress 4
Activity tracking (R.O.M.) Activity tracking (R.O.M.) apr 2010 – jun 2011apr 2010 – jun 2011
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
14019
/04/
2010
03/0
5/20
10
17/0
5/20
10
31/0
5/20
10
14/0
6/20
10
28/0
6/20
10
12/0
7/20
10
26/0
7/20
10
09/0
8/20
10
23/0
8/20
10
06/0
9/20
10
20/0
9/20
10
04/1
0/20
10
18/1
0/20
10
01/1
1/20
10
15/1
1/20
10
29/1
1/20
10
13/1
2/20
10
27/1
2/20
10
10/0
1/20
11
24/0
1/20
11
07/0
2/20
11
21/0
2/20
11
07/0
3/20
11
21/0
3/20
11
04/0
4/20
11
18/0
4/20
11
02/0
5/20
11
16/0
5/20
11
30/0
5/20
11
13/0
6/20
11
27/0
6/20
11
TWG-PF
JRC
Meetings (face-to-face or remote)
5
Output
1. A UML model
2. The data specification(model + use cases)
3. Increased insight on the dataspecification process
6
The Model (1/4)SITE
FACILITY
INSTALLATIONPART
PLOT INSTALLATIONADDRESS(link)
BUILDING(link to BU)
OPERATOR
7
The Model (2/4)
TechnicalUnit
8
The Model (3/4)
ACTIVITY
Process input Process output
ProductWasteEnergySubstance
Emission
Production process
9
Cross-theme relationships
AdministrativeUnits
Cadastralparcels
Addresses
Land Use
Area Mgmt.
…as explicit Relationships…
10INSPIRE progress 10
Key changes from v1.0 to v2.0Key changes from v1.0 to v2.0
• A dedicated editor (with prior experience on Annex I)
• A common model for the “Facility”
• A productive Winter
11INSPIRE progress 11
Parts to be surely improvedParts to be surely improved
• Use Cases
• Energy production facilities
• Off-shore facilities
• Statistical applications of PF data (e.g. statistical business registers)
• Planning
12
Interesting topics
• Temporal aspects (change in use of facilities)
• What about the production process (IN or OUT of scope ? Different views exist and are not currently reconciled)
13
Please note……
Page VI
…and a couple of other similar notes in the text
14
Next steps
• K.I.S.S.
• Next teleconference: July 8
• “recruitment” of testers/reviewers
• Prepare to receive comments
• Follow “revamped” facilitation strategy (defined in May in an informal meeting in Torino and shared with all other TWGs).
1515
If you don’t register to be a tester or If you don’t register to be a tester or reviewer (for any of the groups), please reviewer (for any of the groups), please
tell us whytell us why
Andrea Giacomelli - [email protected]