-
1
archived as
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/RedFlag_01.doc
(also …RedFlag_01.pdf) => doc pdf URL-doc URL-pdf
more Military topics are on the /Military.htm page at doc pdf
URL
note: because important websites are frequently "here today but
gone tomorrow", the following was
archived from
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37991/playing-the-bad-guy-inside-the-
air-forces-elite-aggressor-program-with-one-of-its-top-pilots on
December 15,2020. This is
NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned
website. Indeed, the reader should
only read this back-up copy if it cannot be found at the
original author's site.
Inside The USAF's Elite Aggressor Program by Jamie Hunter / The
War Zone / December 14, 2020
Journey into the shadowy world of the aggressors. Where they
came from; where they're going;
what it takes to become one; and what it's like being one.
The U.S. Air Force takes its aggressor forces very seriously
indeed. They are considered to be vital
training assets that keep operational squadrons sharp, at the
tip of the spear, and ready for whatever
threats may come their way.
One particular pilot has unprecedented experience in this field.
In this exclusive and in-depth
interview, he charts the history and the changing fortunes of
the fascinating and clandestine aggressor
world that is now in a period of dramatic expansion.
RedFlag_01.doc../../Stealthskater_PDF/Documents/RedFlag_01.pdfhttp://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/RedFlag_01.dochttp://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/RedFlag_01.pdf../Military.doc../../Stealthskater_PDF/Military.pdfhttp://www.stealthskater.com/Military.htmhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37991/playing-the-bad-guy-inside-the-air-forces-elite-aggressor-program-with-one-of-its-top-pilotshttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37991/playing-the-bad-guy-inside-the-air-forces-elite-aggressor-program-with-one-of-its-top-pilotshttps://www.thedrive.com/author/jamie-hunter
-
2
The aggressor world
Fighter aircraft types decked out in exotic paint schemes are
becoming a more regular sight on
military flight lines. It reflects a renewed emphasis on
high-end training for fighter pilots to meet near-
peer threats such as those posed by China and Russia. This has
spurred a huge increase in professional
aggressor assets that support regular training. Aggressor forces
include aircraft, systems, and skilled
operators that offer realistic airborne presentations of
potential enemy equipment, tactics, and techniques
to expose front line aviators to the kind of engagements they
could meet in real-world aerial combat.
Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Stahl flies F-16Cs with the 64th
Aggressor Squadron.
It has become one of the most fascinating sides of modern
military aviation, a booming industry for
contractors, and a technology battle for in-house specialist
squadrons to be able to provide seamless
replication of the wealth of high-end capabilities that are
being fielded by possible adversaries.
In 2016, the then-commander of Air Combat Command General
Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle said that
he wanted to outnumber F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II pilots
against an effective aggressor force by
a factor of 3:1 or 4:1. A former aggressor pilot himself,
Carlisle said that pilots of 5th
generation aircraft
needed to go up against radar-equipped adversaries and for
so-called 'red air' to be able to hold their own
in the visual close-quarters fight as well as the
beyond-visual-range one. The result is an expansion in
aggressor forces like never seen before, combining a mixture of
organic and contracted solutions.
Aggressor training like this is nothing new. It stems from the
U.S. Air Force’s Red Baron studies
which unpacked the air war over North Vietnam in extreme detail.
They sought to understand why there
had been such a marked change in the outcome of air-to-air
engagements in the conflict. In the Korean
War, USAF pilots achieved a 10:1 kill ratio over North Korean
and Chinese adversaries. But by the
Vietnam War, this dwindled. By 1968, the kill ratio was an
appalling 2.5 :1 .
The Red Baron reports looked at every significant air-to-air
engagement of the war and what factors
led to a win or a loss. A critical component in the performance
of American pilots was determined as a
deficiency in training against dissimilar types. Pilots almost
always flew against their squadron mates
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/21363/usaf-reveals-timelines-and-basing-plans-for-its-huge-adversary-support-contracthttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/21363/usaf-reveals-timelines-and-basing-plans-for-its-huge-adversary-support-contracthttps://www.nellis.af.mil/News/Article/987504/capt-carlisle-unveiled-mig-23-dedicated-to-acc-commander/https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37350/the-air-forces-new-aggressor-squadron-will-have-both-f-16s-and-f-35shttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/35166/full-scope-of-air-forces-big-contract-awards-to-private-aggressor-firms-revealed
-
3
which meant they had little if any experience of fighting
aircraft with different performance
characteristics. Even fewer pilots had any experience of going
up against equipment, tactics, or
capabilities that emulated a potential enemy.
“The Red Baron study recommended fielding a professional
aggressor force in order to make air
combat training as realistic as possible,” explains Air Force
Lieutenant Colonel Jan ‘Kuts’ Stahl who is
currently the deputy commander of the tenant 57th
Operations Group at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada.
Nellis is known as “The Home of the Fighter Pilot” and it’s here
that the USAF focuses on making
its Combat Air Forces squadrons as lethal as possible. As well
as being home to the USAF's elite
Weapons School and the famous Red Flag aerial wargames, it is
also the home of the USAF's aggressor
forces.
Stahl has been an aggressor pilot for over a decade. He is one
of the most experienced aviators with
this background in the entire USAF and a mine of information
when it comes to replicating bad guys in
the air
“I’ve been in the Air Force for 21 years now. When I initially
entered, I was lucky enough to be
selected to train at Sheppard Air Force Base in Texas which is
also home to the Euro-NATO Joint Jet
Pilot Training scheme and is really the pinnacle for fighter
pilot training here. Instead of going through
training with an all-American crowd, I got to fly with our
European and coalition partners."
"I stayed at Sheppard as a FAIP [First Assignment Instructor
Pilot] and during that time, I made a
lucky acquaintance with a seasoned German MiG-29 'driver' who
was also at Sheppard as an instructor.
Unsure of which fighter community I wanted to go to, he said:
'The F-15Cs kick our butts at Red Flag
every time. You want to fly the C model.' So I took his advice
and selected Eagles, and was fortunate
to get picked up for that.”
“I did two operational tours in the F-15C with the 58th Fighter
Squadron [FS] at Eglin and with the
95th FS at Tyndall. At the time I finished that second tour, the
F-15C footprint in the USAF was
drawing down a little. This limited my options on where I could
go. I had the opportunity to join the
65th Aggressor Squadron flying F-15s at Nellis. So I moved here
in 2009."
"Fast forward about 3 years and I made the transition from
flying with the 65th as an active-duty
pilot to join the reserves and continuing to fly with that
squadron.”
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37350/the-air-forces-new-aggressor-squadron-will-have-both-f-16s-and-f-35shttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/32058/this-is-what-nellis-air-force-bases-ongoing-red-flag-exercise-looks-like-from-spacehttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20914/the-f-35-has-a-new-nickname-given-to-it-by-the-usafs-most-elite-pilotshttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20914/the-f-35-has-a-new-nickname-given-to-it-by-the-usafs-most-elite-pilotshttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/35368/red-flag-is-back-in-business-as-two-of-the-big-air-combat-exercises-kick-off-simultaneously
-
4
A pair of F-15Cs from the 65th Aggressor Squadron which was shut
down in 2014.
Genesis of the aggressors
In the wake of Red Baron, the USAF immersed a handpicked group
of pilots, maintainers, and
intelligence experts into a world of Foreign Materiel
Exploitation (FME) to understand the mindset, the
tactics, and the capabilities of principal adversaries. Air
Force Systems Command (AFSC) was able to
secretly acquire and fly a handful of acquired MiG-17s and
MiG-21s from the late 1960s in order to
fully understand their capabilities.
The 64th Fighter Weapons Squadron (FWS) was established at
Nellis in 1972, initially equipped
with T-38 Talons and quickly becoming a training unit in high
demand. The USAF subsequently
formed the 527th Aggressor Squadron flying F-5E Tiger IIs at RAF
Alconbury in the United Kingdom
and the 26th Aggressor Squadron at Clark Air Base in the
Philippines as the aggressor mission gained
steam.
An F-5E from the 26th Aggressor Squadron at Clark Air Base flies
with a resident F-4E Phantom II.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26372/usaf-mini-documentary-takes-you-behind-the-scenes-of-its-top-secret-cold-war-mig-squadronhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/7858/four-f-5e-tiger-iis-can-fit-inside-a-boeing-747
-
5
In 1977, Tactical Air Command (TAC) was allowed to take
ownership of a handful of the MiGs in
order to initiate the exposure of squadron pilots to these
“assets” under a highly classified program
known as “Constant Peg”. This was designed to take Dissimilar
Air Combat Training (DACT) up
another notch via the use of actual threat aircraft. (You can
read more about Constant Peg and the
associated 4477th Test and Evaluation Squadron (TES) “Red
Eagles” program here.)
The initial cadre of aggressor pilots at the 64th FWS had access
to the assets which enabled them to
build their knowledge base and refine the threat presentations
they provided. In addition, TAC squadron
aircrews had the chance to experience flying against real Soviet
aircraft during detachments or in special
slots during Red Flag exercises.
“As Constant Peg was being fielded, the aggressors provided an
additional layer of operational
security for that program in the sense that there were several
experienced aggressors that flew here at
Nellis for 2-or-3 days a week and who were then very quietly
flown to Tonopah for the remainder of
their duty periods to fly the MiGs up there,” Stahl confirms.
“This provided a cover story to not only
keep that program as operationally secure as possible but it
also generated additional credibility and skill
level for the aggressors in the sense that those were the exact
same guys that were actually operating the
threat assets and knew better than anyone else what those
airframes could actually do in the air.”
By the 1990s, the end of the Cold War and ensuing cutbacks
started to severely impact the
aggressors. Constant Peg officially wound down in 1988 followed
by the 64th Aggressor Squadron
(AGRS) in 2000. At one stage, the entire formal USAF red air
program consisted of a handful of F-16s
that were attached to the 414th Combat Training Squadron at
Nellis.
However, by 2003 the 64th AGRS was back in business, followed by
the 18th AGRS at Eielson
AFB in 2007 to primarily support Red Flag Alaska. Both were
equipped with early Block F-16C/Ds. In
addition, the USAF was busy reactivating the 65th AGRS with
F-15C/Ds which would raise the bar
once more for the USAF aggressors.
F-16Cs from the 64th AGRS and F-15Cs from the 65th AGRS,
photographed in 2010.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37382/veteran-pilots-give-commentary-on-incredible-video-of-americas-secret-mig-squadron-in-actionhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26372/usaf-mini-documentary-takes-you-behind-the-scenes-of-its-top-secret-cold-war-mig-squadronhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/32919/pilot-takes-amazing-images-of-area-51-and-tonopah-air-base-while-skirting-restricted-airspacehttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26372/usaf-mini-documentary-takes-you-behind-the-scenes-of-its-top-secret-cold-war-mig-squadron?fbclid=IwAR1P4uEF81YWP4Z7Orcd7OlZPscvy_1jD3GueDTosCfcXyAOvgVa0c1K-fUhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37350/the-air-forces-new-aggressor-squadron-will-have-both-f-16s-and-f-35s
-
6
Becoming an Aggressor
“The Aggressor Program has gone through a number of changes over
the years,” says Lieutenant
Colonel Col Stahl. “At the time I was selected, the bottom line
prerequisite to join the Aggressors was
that you had to be a highly experienced instructor pilot. And
not just that. The Aggressors had a list of
people who were potential candidates and they individually
checked them (name-by-name vetting) to
pick people who were not just qualified as instructors but who
also had the right attitude and the ability
to not just want to win all the time but to actually teach the
blue air participants. Those very subtle and
detailed lessons learned against particular threats. I was lucky
enough to get selected.”
“To become an Aggressor to a certain extent, you need to be a
bit of a nerd. Interested and caring
not just the airframe that you fly but also the threat
airframes. Part of the process is immersing yourself
in that environment and being as smart as you possibly can about
a particular topic. The Air Force picks
up a new pilot or ground controller and selects a particular
specialization track for them."
"For example, when I initially joined the aggressors, the chosen
topic for me was air-to-air radar-
guided missiles. This meant I went to our FME counterparts, saw
the actual missiles taken apart, and
knew what each individual component part did and how it
performed. I went to our intelligence
counterparts at the CIA and at the National Air and Space
Intelligence Center [NASIC] to put my head
together with the best minds in the business to try to learn
about that topic. They sent me to foreign trade
shows in China, Russia, Belarus, you-name-it so that I could put
eyes on these exact assets and try to
learn as much about them as I possibly could.”
“It was a multi-year process being as smart as possible on that
topic while also maintaining a
baseline knowledge of other threat systems. It takes significant
effort and expense to give the
Aggressors exposure to these systems. When you complete the
process of certification, you get a
Russian Ruble [coin] with your name engraved on it. That’s how
you distinguish an experienced
Aggressor from a newbie.”
Aggressor F-15s over the Nevada Test and Training Range in
2010.
-
7
Stahl flew with the 65th AGRS to within 6 months of its
deactivation in early 2014. “When the
squadron shut down, I could have either moved away to fly F-15s
at another base. Or if I wanted to stay
at Nellis, I had the opportunity to cross train to the F-16
either for the local Aggressor program with the
64th or into other Nellis-based activities like operational test
with the F-16 which is what I ended up
doing.”
Stahl then commanded the little-known 706th Fighter Squadron
until 2019 which he explains is by
far the largest fighter squadron in the entire USAF in terms of
people but doesn't own any airframes of
its own. “It’s also one of the few fighter squadrons that has
pilots that fly every fighter MDS [Mission
Design Series] in the Service.”
The 706th is a reserve squadron that loans experienced aviators
to the active-duty units at Nellis. “If
a highly skilled, highly experienced, instructor pilot decides
to leave the active-duty, we offer them the
opportunity to switch patches and stay locally so that we can
continue to draw benefit on their
experience and corporate knowledge. That’s what happened to
me.”
A new era of expansion
The 65th AGRS ended up flying F-15C/Ds from 2006 until it closed
its doors in 2014. That was a
controversial decision ultimately driven by a dire budgetary
situation.
“It was a complicated story,” says Stahl. “With the
international security situation, aggressors are
always in high demand. The fact that Nellis wants to continue to
field a challenging training
environment that simulates those aggressive efforts to challenge
the warfighting advantages that we
have means that there needs to be a constant development in the
quality of the focus we have here to
train blue [forces]. Nellis needed Aggressors more than ever at
that time.
“The F-35 footprint at Nellis was just beginning to get spun up
at that point as well. We were going
to need more Aggressors, not less. The Aggressors that we did
have needed that next level of capability
in order to provide a challenging sparring partner to the 5th
generation guys. It wasn't a decision made
easily. For budgetary reasons, there was just no way to keep the
unit open at the time. It was a decision
that we are now having to deal with the after-effects of.
"The combined fielded Aggressor forces we have here at Nellis
are barely able to fill 70-or-so
percent of what our optimal demand for adversary forces is.
That’s what was leading the USAF to look
at alternative courses of action such as contract Aggressors as
well as inviting visiting units from
elsewhere to come and help us out.”
Contracted Aggressors help the USAF to provide a suitable mass
of red air.
-
8
“Because of the demands that you put on the adversaries here at
Nellis, it was clear from the get-go
that we weren’t going to be able to shut down a unit like the
65th and immediately replace it with
something equivalent. The fielding of contract Aggressor forces
was always intended to be a multi-year
process in which initially we put jets on the line to fill more
of the demand for quantity as opposed to the
demand for quality. We then put measures in place that over a
period of multiple years to stimulate the
contract adversary industry to put some of these specific
requirements and demands that we need in
order to meet that quality benchmark as well.
"At the moment, I think we’re still in the early stages of that
process. But there’s some really
promising signs that in the near future we’re going to get some
fairly significant capability increases
from what the contractors are offering us. That’s going to take
some of the strain off some of the USAF
Aggressors which I would say are the ultimate low-density
high-demand assets that we have here.”
The USAF is ultimately looking to stimulate the red air
contractors to gradually build to a point
where they’re financially and operationally able to field
airframes of higher and higher capability.
“The Air Force was deliberate to not put all the eggs in one
basket and split the contracts up to see
which of them was going to be more successful in continuing to
ramp up the capabilities that they are
able to field,” explains Stahl. “The contracts also break
adversaries down into various capability levels
because what you need for a trainee flying their first couple of
flights in say an F-16 is not the same as
you need for an F-22 Weapons Officer."
A handful of F-15Cs were assigned to the 57th Adversary Tactics
Group at Nellis for a short period after
the 65th AGRS closed down.
"The Air Force is offering a lower entry level Aggressor which
allows some companies to come in
with a fairly low upfront investment to get into the contract
and be able to generate revenue. Then they
are gradually raising capabilities to levels that the company
can progress into. Based on what we’ve
heard here, there’s a lot of companies out there that have some
really exciting capabilities that they’re
working on. They need to get their foot in the door and start
making revenue and then starting making
the investment.
-
9
“The Weapons School is our central coordinating authority here
because they take up most of the
aggressor demand at Nellis. They apportion who does what; who
does the 64th AGRS support; who
does Draken International support; or do we support together.
Managing the contracts and ensuring the
contractors meet those quality benchmarks is where the
Aggressors come in. We lead the missions that
they are part of. And we also run the post-mission reviews of
performance,and ensure they comply with
demands and tactical learning points that we required them to
provide.”
Existing F-16Cs within the 64th AGRS will be complemented by
examples being passed across from the
24th TASS.
Aggressor developments at Nellis
As well as leaning on the contractor-furnished solutions, the
USAF is pushing up the high-end
capabilities of its in-house aggressors. It plans to increase
the size of the 64th AGRS and reform the
sister 65th AGRS in 2021.
Internal USAF reorganization has resulted in a decision to close
down the 24th Tactical Air Support
Squadron (TASS) which flies Vipers at Nellis. The unit is
currently a centralized location for training F-
16 Close Air Support (CAS) instructors and for retaining a
dedicated close air support knowledge base.
Its closure has presented a good opportunity to move its Block
42 F-16C/D Vipers over to the
Aggressors.
“We currently have 19 pre-Block F-16s [Block 25 and 32] and the
game plan is to take over an
additional 11 Block 42 F-16s,” says Stahl. “Initially when the
24th TASS shuts down, the 64th AGRS is
going to become a very large squadron. But there are efforts
underway to reactivate the 65th AGRS
around the summer of 2021 when we split those assets into 2
units to make them a bit more
manageable."
The 64th will probably retain the Block 25/32 aircraft and the
aircraft from the 24th TASS will most
likely flow over to the 65th AGRS as that unit is
reactivated.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/25927/check-out-cockpit-in-draken-internationals-private-mirage-f-1m-aggressor-jethttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37350/the-air-forces-new-aggressor-squadron-will-have-both-f-16s-and-f-35s
-
10
“That’s when it gets really interesting because that’s when the
early Block F-35s start arriving here
at Nellis and move into the 65th AGRS which then becomes a mixed
F-35 and F-16 Aggressor
squadron,” Stahl enthuses. “It’s still in a bit of flux. But I
think it’s fair to say that summer 2021 is
when we expect to see those first F-35s [here at the
Aggressors].
“The goal for the Aggressors has always been where we are
essentially matching the aggressiveness
of our Global competitors. They are fielding technology at a
rapid pace. Our goal has always been to
match -- and if possible exceed -- that level of technological
advancement so that the threat we are
preparing the warfighter for locally exceeds anything that
they’re ever likely to face in battle. Not
necessarily just from a technological standpoint but also from
the employment standpoint. We’re here
to have the technology and then employ it to its highest level
so we’re presenting the highest that we can
possibly put together.”
Early Block F-35As will join the Nellis aggressors in 2021.
Alongside the F-35s, the introduction of Block 42 F-16 Vipers
will bring additional benefits for the
aggressors. Their Link 16 data links will be an early boost for
the USAF aggressors at Nellis. Some of
the current F-16s with the 64th AGRS carry the SADL (Situational
Awareness Data Link) which serves
as an intra-flight link between the aggressors. Link 16 will
enable the new 65th AGRS adversaries to
make use of a full battlespace picture and operate more
independently as a coordinated team instead of a
more traditional approach of working with Ground Controlled
Intercept (GCI) controllers.
It's also worth noting that the F-35A has a Multifunction
Advanced Data Link (MADL) which
interfaces with Link 16 via a gateway so that it can receive
information from the Vipers while remaining
fully stealthy and it can share information as well. One of the
advantages of MADL is that it is stealthy
by design due to its transmission architecture. F-35 also has
organic Link 16 broadcast capability. But
using it can negate the aircraft's stealth capabilities.
Instead of targeting fleetwide capabilities, the Aggressors are
able to dip into new areas of
technology to add small niche capabilities to help them
replicate specific real-world threats. One of the
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37350/the-air-forces-new-aggressor-squadron-will-have-both-f-16s-and-f-35shttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20381/master-chart-showing-us-military-aircraft-and-their-data-links-includes-rq-170-sentinelhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/30988/air-force-wants-its-xq-58a-valkyrie-drone-to-help-f-22s-and-f-35s-talk-to-each-otherhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/13562/we-chew-the-fat-about-bacn-with-program-boss-and-airman-who-used-it-in-combat
-
11
64th AGRS F-16s flew with a pod very similar to the Legion
infrared search-and-track (IRST) pod in
2013. Stahl says work has also been undertaken with Litening and
Sniper targeting pods to simulate
IRST capability.
The Block 42 F-16 avionics architecture is also more readily
able to support the fielding of new
systems such as the Angry Kitten pod which was recently adopted
by the 64th AGRS. This pod
incorporates advanced Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM)
which is the highest complexity
jamming technology and can counter increasingly sophisticated
electronic warfare threats. The
Operational Flight Program (OFP) in the later block F-16s is
more frequently updated and readily able to
accept enhancements that can help keep the aggressors
relevant.
A 64th AGRS pilot loads a data card into an Angry Kitten jamming
pod.
An Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar is another
capability that the aggressor F-16s
would benefit from as increasing numbers of threat aircraft have
these advanced sensors. The USAF is
already fielding new Northrop Grumman AN/APG-83 AESA radars in
its F-16 fleet. Stahl says for the
Aggressors: “It’s a capability that has to happen sooner or
later.”
New threats, new ways to replicate
So how does a modern day F-16 Aggressor pilot learn how to fly
in a way that accurately replicates
the nuances of a Chinese J-20 Mighty Dragon, for example.
Stahl says: “You need to know how the system operates and how
the pilot operates in that particular
system. So when we’re looking at the J-20, for instance, there
as much emphasis on trying to look
inside the mind of the Chinese pilot. What caliber of person
they’re recruiting to fly that asset. The
background those pilots are from. What they flew before and
experiences they’re likely to have had.
Where they’ve been based. What operational scenarios they are
trained to.
“Every once in a while, the stars align and a particular asset
that we want to know more about
becomes available for us to actually touch. For instance, I was
lucky enough to have the once-in-a-
lifetime opportunity to fly the Su-30MKI when the Indian Air
Force came to Red Flag Alaska in 2016.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34897/f-15-uses-new-infrared-search-and-track-pod-to-shoot-down-target-with-aim-9x-sidewinderhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34966/navys-super-hornet-boss-on-the-jets-game-changing-infrared-search-and-track-sensorhttps://news.gatech.edu/2013/08/14/electronic-warfare-development-targets-fully-adaptive-threat-response-technologyhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/35678/how-f-16-testers-are-evolving-the-jets-new-radar-beyond-the-homeland-defense-missionhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/8709/usaf-aggressor-f-16-freshly-painted-in-shark-scheme-to-mimic-latest-russian-jetshttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34990/chinas-enhanced-j-20b-stealth-fighter-may-arrive-soon-heres-what-it-could-includehttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/36988/indias-first-indigenous-air-launched-radar-killing-missile-is-headed-for-service
-
12
If you want to get smart about how a Flanker operates, that’s
about as good as it gets. Obviously as
Aggressors, we position ourselves when opportunities like these
become available to ensure we’re ready
for it and take advantage of it. We take what we can get. Flying
the Su-30 was definitely a pinnacle in
my career.”
Other methods to bring accurate threat replication to USAF
pilots are coming via synthetic training,
either in simulators, or in embedded virtual constructive
training scenarios.
“The biggest emphasis the Air Force is currently trying to get
the operators to agree to is that the
future lies in Live, Virtual, and Constructive [LVC]
integration,” explains Stahl. “It’s not so much about
which environment and medium in which we do the bulk of our
training but which medium is best
suited to train to specific capabilities that we need the
operator to have. For instance, threat countries
are coming up with next-generation missile capabilities that
allows you to take air-to-air shots at ranges
that even 10 years ago we would never have even considered.
"We want to simulate and train to those capabilities. But we
start to running into things like airspace
limitations. The Nevada Test and Training Range [NTTR] is
literally not long enough to allow us to
simulate the full range capability of some of these weapons that
we have to train against. Now you get
into a situation where other mediums are better suited for
training against that specific capability. The
challenge is how you tie all these mediums together.”
Lt. Col. Stahl in the cockpit of an F-16.
“The Live part is what we do in jets. The Virtual part is where
we take actual operators and get them
to work their platforms in a simulator. The constructive element
is where you have threat entities
actually simulated by a computer system. Simulated entities
inside a simulator system. That’s what we
hope to be able to do as we refine LVC and blend them seamlessly
with some of the live and virtual. If I
take my jet into the NTTR where I can see some of the virtual
and constructive entities simultaneously
with the real world elements I’m training against. And now we
see these next generation threats.”
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/6108/shadowy-new-missile-appears-under-the-wing-of-chinese-j-16-fighterhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28636/meet-the-aim-260-the-air-force-and-navys-future-long-range-air-to-air-missilehttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/32919/pilot-takes-amazing-images-of-area-51-and-tonopah-air-base-while-skirting-restricted-airspace
-
13
One of the nodes that will tie together and enable some of this
LVC is currently in progress at Nellis.
The Virtual Test and Training Center (VTTC) is spearheading this
charge.
“Initial steps are already in place,” says Stahl. “At higher
level exercises like Weapons School
Integration and certain Red Flags, virtual and constructive is a
significant part of what we do because of
the complexity of the threat we are being asked to simulate. The
goal of the VTTC is to afford more
simulation infrastructure here. The trick is to tie the various
technologies together where they talk to
each other and become visible to one another in their own
architecture. And how they then become
relevant to simulate a particular capability or particular
threat that we need to train against.”
A 64th AGRS F-16C joins F-22 Raptors for a night mission during
a Red Flag exercise.
A constant evolution
The use of advanced simulations will undoubtedly be one of the
biggest changes in the way that the
Aggressors operate. However, the vast majority of current
training is dedicated to live flying. Stahl says
the main evolution that he has seen in the Aggressors has been a
focus from pure DACT (dogfighting)
towards maximizing the integration of assets both on the blue
and red air sides of the house.
“On the blue side, we try to provide a threat that not only
challenges individual airframes but also
the ability for those to work together. We have tried to come up
with counter-tactics that specifically
challenge the 4th and 5th gen integration. Say you have four
Raptors and four Eagles trying to employ
in the air-to-air environment at the same time. We have to come
up with specific counter tactics that
challenge the way that they work together and the tactics they
use.”
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/20914/the-f-35-has-a-new-nickname-given-to-it-by-the-usafs-most-elite-pilots
-
14
A photograph from 2010 showing Nellis aggressors alongside a
422nd Test and Evaluation Squadron F-15E
and F-22A.
“On the red side, it means we have to work very closely together
-- for example, with our surface-to-
air-missile shooters on the range -- and try to come with
tactics that involve both of those elements
working in close conjunction. We might put the fighters forward
and keep the SAMs quiet and then
maybe pull the fighters back and light up every SAM battery.
There’s a significant amount of
integration and interplay that we can achieve. But it requires
that next-gen mindset. Not just in the
narrow lane of your own capabilities but also how to best bring
them all together into one coherent
threat picture that gives blue as big of a challenge as
possible.”
In addition to the missiles and fighters, this also includes the
cyber and space domains which Stahl
says massively increases complexity.
“I’d say this is the biggest way in which our mission has
evolved in the last couple of years. This is
such a fast-moving ballgame, capabilities are being fielded all
the time and some quickly become
obsolete.”
Stahl explains that the Aggressors’ knowledge of threat
capabilities in these areas are extremely
high.
Turning back to the aircraft themselves, Stahl says the
proliferation of 5th generation stealth fighters
has had a big impact on the mission.
“This has significantly changed the way we do business in the
sense that there’s really nobody else
in the world that’s doing as much training using 5th gen assets
as we are. So, we are having to take a bit
of a leap of faith and make our own assumptions regarding what
an adversary would possibly do when
faced with a 5th gen adversary. We are making assumptions in a
5th gen vs. 4th gen engagement and a
5th gen vs. 5th gen environment now that we have the F-35s
coming online with the Aggressors as well.
-
15
“There’s a level of guesswork for realistic scenarios as to what
could happen. Bt as Russia comes
online with the Su-57 Felon and China with the J-20, we are
watching those developments very
carefully so we can make informed decisions on how we can tweak
the scenarios locally to make them
as relevant to what’s going on in threat countries as we
possibly can.”
As to the most rewarding missions as an Aggressor, Stahl
reflects on the time he led a 48-aircraft
red air “package” that included 12 different platforms.
“Being 'MiG-1' for a 48-ship mission in a Red Flag and seeing
the game plan come together was
amazing. To present a challenging threat, you have to expand
your situational awareness as much as
you possibly can so that when merges dogfights happen, even if
you don't see everybody, you have the
awareness of who is in that merge with you. Are they high or
low? Which way are they heading? How
your turn performance will match? It’s like 3-dimensional chess
at 1,000 mph and it takes many years
to get good at it.”
Contact the editor: [email protected]
Reader Comments
1. dumpster4
"Flight tests on the Tactical Combat Training System Increment
II (TCTS II) developed by Collins
Aerospace (part of Raytheon Technologies) and Leonardo DRS will
begin in December 2020 and
complete in February 2021. The Milestone C production decision
for TCTS II which provides a blended
live, virtual, and constructive solution for air combat training
was expected in April 2021," said Chip
Gilkison, director of integrated training solutions at
Collins.
Gilkison said that TCTS II provided a synthetic inject to live
(SITL) capability by taking virtual
(simulator) or constructive (synthetic) entities and injecting
them into the live environment so that an
aircraft would sense their existence and react to them in
addition to any real participants in the training
event. These entities could also include ships or ground-based
air defence (GBAD) units, as well as
aircraft.
“The trick is to expand the number of actors in the training
environment to emulate what is likely to
be the operational reality -- which will be very busy -- so that
aircrew can train as they will fight,” said
Gilkison.
See:
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/flight-tests-on-tcts-ii-blended-lvc-air-combat-
training-system-begin
"For example, we might put the fighters forward and keep the
SAMs quiet and then maybe pull the
fighters back and light up every SAM battery. There’s a
significant amount of integration and interplay
that we can achieve, but it requires that next-gen mindset."
The Iraqis actually tried that in Operation Desert Storm. To no
avail ...
"Four-against-two odds -- especially when the team of four has
F-15s versus enemy MiGs -- is a
good setup. But the F-15s had been tricked. As they pursued the
MiGs, the ground suddenly erupted
with surface-to-air missiles all locked on U.S. jets and racing
to their targets."
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/35667/check-out-these-images-of-russias-second-su-57-felon-fighter-under-constructionhttps://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/24841/chinas-j-20-stealth-fighter-stuns-by-brandishing-full-load-of-missiles-at-zhuhai-air-showmailto:[email protected]://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/flight-tests-on-tcts-ii-blended-lvc-air-combat-training-system-beginhttps://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/flight-tests-on-tcts-ii-blended-lvc-air-combat-training-system-begin
-
16
"The American pilots were forced to jettison their external fuel
tanks and take evasive actions. They
deployed flares, put the planes through gut-wrenching turns, and
ultimately avoided every missile fired
against them. This left them in suddenly-safe skies once again
except for the two MiGs that had lured
them. The Americans still smelled blood and decided to continue
the pursuit."
See:
https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/desert-storm-f-15-trap/
2. Brian Hart
The movie "Top Gun" is where I first heard the Navy ratio in
Vietnam fell to 3:1. "During Korea,
the Navy kill ratio was 12-to-1. We shot down 12 of their jets
for every one of ours. During Vietnam,
that ratio fell to 3-to-1. Our pilots became dependent upon
missiles. They had lost some of their
dogfighting skills.
Top Gun was created to teach A.C.M. (Air Combat Maneuvering)
dog-fighting. By the end of
Vietnam, that ratio was back up to 12-to-1.
if on the Internet, Press on your browser to return to
the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session,
simply this
file's window-session; the previous window-session should still
remain 'active'
https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-history/desert-storm-f-15-trap/