Top Banner
Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity March 2019
12

Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

Apr 22, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

March 2019

Page 2: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

Outline

1 Fatigue Management - Helicopters

2 Fixed Wing vs Rotary Wing

3 Traditional Helicopter Usage Monitoring

4 Flight Manoeuvre Recognition

5 Extending Component Retirement Times

6 Risk Assessment

7 Condition Data and Corrosion Sensors

8 Being a Smart Customer

9 Loads and Vibration

2 Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 3: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

• Design and Fatigue Life Assumptions

– Understanding the design assumptions

– Testing assumptions through usage monitoring

– Measuring fatigue drivers

– What is the aircraft condition telling us?

• Component Retirement Times (CRTs)

– Safe life

– Assumptions made when calculating CRTs

• Design Usage Spectrum

– Composite worst case usage spectrum

– Load spectrum and manoeuvres

– Measuring complicated fatigue drivers

Fatigue Management - Helicopters

3 Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 4: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

Fixed Wing vs Rotary Wing

4

• High Cycle fatigue

– Loads on dynamic components for each rotation of

the rotor

– Small changes in stress = large change in number

of cycles

• Critical components replaced

• Complex DUS

– Expressed as a percentage of flight time

– Less severe for one component may be more

severe for another component

• Asymmetrical Loads

– Left hands turns more damaging than right hand

turns for some components due to rotational forces

• Lack of access to lifing substantiation

S

n

Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 5: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

Traditional Helicopter Usage Monitoring

5

• Many fatigue drivers are difficult to

record / measure

• Manually record a limited number of

fatigue drivers

– Even simple fatigue drivers are difficult to

record accurately

• Critical Structure consists of rotating

components

– Loads are often difficult to measure

• Compare to DUS which may be poorly

described

• Improving UM through Flight

Manoeuvre Recognition

Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 6: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

Flight Manoeuvre Recognition

6

•Analysis of Usage data to determine actual

flight manoeuvres– Data from Flight Data Recorder or HUMS

– Algorithms match flight data to DUS

manoeuvres

– Tested against flight test data to validate

•FMR outcomes can input to effective

fatigue management– Allows capture of a higher percentage of

fatigue drivers than traditional UM

– Test assumptions made in FM / CRTs

– Requires flight manoeuvres to be linked to

fatigue damage

Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 7: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

Flight Manoeuvre Recognition

7 Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 8: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

• Extending Black Hawk CRTs using

AUUS2 Spectrum

– Based on severe Australian Spectrum

– Until recently only used AUUS2 to reduce

lives

– Enable greater flexibility for the SPO

• Black Hawk Risk Assessment

– No access to the required data to

determine if changes apply to our CRE

– Establish level of risk based on available

information

– Determine appropriate approach to reduce

the risk

– Work closely with stakeholders to agree on

appropriate action in light of PWD

Extending CRTs and Risk Assessment

8

Defence Harmonised Risk Matrix

Risk Management in the Defence Aviation Safety Program

AC 003/2018

Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 9: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

• Insufficient for effective fatigue or

environmental degradation management

• Non marinised helicopters being

deployed on LHDs

• Environmental degradation management

should be addressed before there is an

issue– management and technology perspective

– Improve condition monitoring and

environmental degradation management

• Understanding and managing

degradation prone areas on the aircraft

• Using corrosion sensors and modelling to

predict rates of corrosion

Condition Data and Corrosion Sensors

9 Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 10: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

• What is the service provider being

contracted to provide?

• Understand your CRE

• Understand the fatigue management

system being employed

• What outputs are you going to get and

what do they mean?

• ASSUMPTIONS –Are they relevant?

Being a Smart Customer

10 Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 11: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

• Measure critical structure loads on ADF aircraft

• Better understanding of the applicability of OEM Design Usage Spectra

• Input to Romeo SLAP / SLEP

• Understand loads and vibration on the airframe to: – reduce “nuisance” cracking

– avoid just moving the cracking to a new area

Loads and Vibration Monitoring

11 Innovative Sustainment | March 2019

Page 12: Innovative Sustainment of ADF Helicopter Structural Integrity

12 Innovative Sustainment | March 2019