Top Banner
SUMILA GULYANI NOVEMBER 2006 INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE “DEMAND SIDE” INSIGHTS FROM FIRM RESPONSES
16

INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

Mar 20, 2016

Download

Documents

Elle

INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE. “DEMAND SIDE” INSIGHTS FROM FIRM RESPONSES. SUMILA GULYANI NOVEMBER 2006. Key variables in infrastructure reform. Restructure. Invest. Institutions & governance. Demand. Supply. Technology. Development practitioners’ view. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

SUMILA GULYANINOVEMBER 2006

INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

“DEMAND SIDE” INSIGHTS FROM FIRM RESPONSES

Page 2: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

2

Key variables in infrastructure reform

Institutions & governance

Demand

Technology

Invest

Restructure

Supply

Page 3: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

3

Development practitioners’ view

“infrastructure raises productivity …” India Infrastructure Report

“the adequacy of infrastructure helps determine one country’s success and another’s failures . . . (and) good infrastructure raises productivity and lowers production costs”

World Bank

Paradox?: Industrial successes without infrastructure

And little support in the literature

Page 4: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

4

Research Questions & Methodology

How does inadequate infrastructure affect the costs and competitiveness of firms?

How do firms respond?

Indian Auto Industry (31 firms)Major Case Study: Maruti

Page 5: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

5

Power Problems: Firm-level Perspective

Chronic shortage (Cause: Demand >> Supply)– Hard to get a connection– Frequent power cuts

Power quality problem (Cause: D>S, poor infrastr)– Voltage fluctuations– Frequency fluctuations

Impacts: loss of production; machines shut down, material losses, product quality variations

Solution: Self generate

Page 6: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

6

Maruti’s innovative power solution

Idle capacity

Polluting fuels

High Cost

Critique against self-generation

High plant load factor: 70%

Use gas- a clean fuel

Low-cost & hi-quality US$0.08/unit

Maruti Case

Page 7: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

7

Maruti’s Power Sharing Arrangements

35,00030,00025,00020,00015,00010,000

5,0000

90-9194-95

95-9696-97

97-98

(GT-1) 93-9492-93

91-92(GT-2)

(GT-3)

HSEBSuppliersMaruti-own

MWH

Page 8: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

8

Transmission and Distribution– Dedicated underground 11 kv cables– Dedicated 66 kv transmission line

Billings and Collections– 100% Collection

Tariffs Ensure Cost Recovery– Supplier firms ($ 0.09) cross-subsidize HSEB

($0.04)

Maruti’s Mini-Electric Utility

Page 9: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

9

Disruptions in supplier production affect assembly operations

Time & material losses at supplier create costs for assembler

Variations in quality are problematic The “inventories solution” is expensive

How important is the supply chain?

Why? Supply-chain effects

Page 10: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

10

Cost structure & the supply-chain

78.3%61.7% 76.2%

67.3% 76.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Maruti

Hindus

tan

A-Leya

ndTelc

o

Hero-H

onda

% o

f Tot

al E

xpen

ditu

re Other expensesDepreciationFinancial ExpensesFrieght,Forwarding & pkgingStores & SparesMaterials & ComponentsWages,Salaries,benefitsPower & fuel

Page 11: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

11

CONCLUSIONS

Page 12: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

12

Conclusions Adverse impacts of poor infrastructure:

– production and quality suffer at the plant – cascade through industrial supply-chains– external diseconomies are more debilitating

Firms respond: Some devise innovative solutions Ability to respond has increased

– Technological revolution – Institutional innovations– Response=f (technology, impact)

+management/vision

But, still, cannot solve the problem entirelyCrucial to understand demand

Page 13: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

13

The Framework: Power sharingUnderstanding Demand for InfrastructureSupply-side -Scale economies (-)

-Tech vendors (+)-New/special contracts (+)

Response

Demand for public infra

Self-generation with sharing

Impact

With lean productionexternal diseconomies

Direct & External costs & benefits

Page 14: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

14

Expands the options for users & govt

GENERATION TRANSMISSION DISTRIBUTION USERSSUPPLY DEMAND

Page 15: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE

15

Practical Implications Need for Govt action persists Roles:

– Traditional: Investor, Planner and Regulator– Non-traditional: enabler, deal-maker, partner

Govt can and should:– leverage user interest and investments– Work with a broader set of possible solutions

Industrial targeting: alternatives– New Integrated Industrial Parks (Mohan report,

1996) – Vs. Focus on existing industrial districts – Franchises for “infrastructure districts”

Page 16: INNOVATING WITH INFRASTUCTURE