Inkjet-printed graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells David Dodoo-Arhin, a,b Richard C. T. Howe, a Guohua Hu, a Yinghe Zhang, c Pritesh Hiralal, d Abdulhakeem Bello, e Gehan Amaratunga, d and Tawfique Hasan* ,a a Cambridge Graphene Centre, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, UK. b Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, P. O. Box Lg 77, Accra-Legon, Ghana. c Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. d Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, UK. e Department of Physics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa. We present a stable inkjet printable graphene ink, formulated in isopropyl alcohol via liquid phase exfoliation of chemically pristine graphite with a polymer stabilizer. The rheology and low deposition temperature of the ink allow uniform printing. We use the graphene ink to fabricate counter electrodes (CE) for natural and ruthenium-based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The repeatability of the printing process for the CEs is demonstrated through an array of inkjet-printed graphene electrodes, with ~5% standard deviation in the sheet resistance. As photosensitizers, we investigate natural tropical dye extracts from Pennisetum glaucum, Hibiscus sabdariffa and Caesalpinia pulcherrima. Among the three natural dyes, we find extracts from C. pulcherrima exhibits the best performance, with ~0.9% conversion efficiency using a printed graphene counter electrode and a comparable ~1.1% efficiency using a platinum (Pt) CE. When used with N719 dye, the inkjet-printed graphene CE shows a ~3.0% conversion efficiency, compared to ~4.4% obtained using Pt CEs. Our results show that inkjet printable graphene ink, without any chemical functionalization, offers a flexible and scalable fabrication route, with a material cost of only ~2.7% of the equivalent solution processed Pt-based electrode. *Corresponding author. e-mail: [email protected] (Tawfique Hasan)
28
Embed
Inkjet-printed graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized ... · Inkjet-printed graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells David Dodoo-Arhin,a,b Richard C. T. Howe,a Guohua Hu,a
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Inkjet-printed graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells
David Dodoo-Arhin,a,b Richard C. T. Howe,a Guohua Hu,a Yinghe Zhang,c Pritesh Hiralal,d
Abdulhakeem Bello,e Gehan Amaratunga,d and Tawfique Hasan*,a
a Cambridge Graphene Centre, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge, CB3 0FA, UK. b Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, P. O. Box Lg
77, Accra-Legon, Ghana. c Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. d Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge,
CB3 0FA, UK. e Department of Physics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.
We present a stable inkjet printable graphene ink, formulated in isopropyl alcohol via
liquid phase exfoliation of chemically pristine graphite with a polymer stabilizer. The
rheology and low deposition temperature of the ink allow uniform printing. We use
the graphene ink to fabricate counter electrodes (CE) for natural and ruthenium-based
dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The repeatability of the printing process for the
CEs is demonstrated through an array of inkjet-printed graphene electrodes, with ~5%
standard deviation in the sheet resistance. As photosensitizers, we investigate natural
tropical dye extracts from Pennisetum glaucum, Hibiscus sabdariffa and Caesalpinia
pulcherrima. Among the three natural dyes, we find extracts from C. pulcherrima
exhibits the best performance, with ~0.9% conversion efficiency using a printed
graphene counter electrode and a comparable ~1.1% efficiency using a platinum (Pt)
CE. When used with N719 dye, the inkjet-printed graphene CE shows a ~3.0%
conversion efficiency, compared to ~4.4% obtained using Pt CEs. Our results show
that inkjet printable graphene ink, without any chemical functionalization, offers a
flexible and scalable fabrication route, with a material cost of only ~2.7% of the
Graphene has attracted significant interest in a variety of electronic and optoelectronic
applications, including photovoltaics. This is because it can serve multiple purposes:
as a transparent conducting electrode [1, 2], as a channel for charge transport [3] and
as a counter electrode material [4]. It has been reported that the edge plane sites of
graphene exhibit faster electron-transfer kinetics than the basal plane sites [5]. Thus,
exfoliated graphene flakes/platelets may offer good electrocatalytic properties. Coupled with this, electrical conductivity and chemical stability makes graphene an
attractive counter electrode material.
Graphene can be prepared via various top-down and bottom-up approaches; the most
widely exploited ones being mechanical cleavage [6], chemical vapour deposition
(CVD) [7], and solution based methods such as chemical exfoliation [8] and
ultrasonic-assisted exfoliation (UALPE) [9–12]. Though micromechanically cleaved
graphene is ideal for fundamental studies due to the high quality of the exfoliated
material, the low yield of the process renders it unsuitable for large-scale applications
[6]. In recent years, CVD has been scaled up to produce large-area, high quality
graphene [2, 7] accompanied by a significantly improved understanding of the growth
mechanisms and graphene-catalyst interaction [13], but the high temperature
production process and subsequent transfer to target substrate is not always ideal for
photovoltaic devices. In addition, CVD grown mono- or few-layer graphene has
limited exposed edges, a key requirement for enhanced electrocatalytic properties [5,
14]. Solution processing, meanwhile, allows scalable production of dispersions
consisting of single- and few-layer graphene flakes under ambient conditions [9–12].
These can be used as inks using existing functional printing and coating techniques,
enabling graphene to be deposited onto substrates such as silicon and glass as well as
flexible materials [15–18]. Inkjet printing is of particular interest, allowing additive
patterning, direct writing without the use of masks or stencils and low cost [15, 17,
19].
Amongst the different photovoltaic devices, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) offer
certain advantages, including low cost materials [20, 21], economic fabrication, good
low-light conversion efficiencies (>12%) and many colour design possibilities [22,
23]. The DSSC structure consists of a ~10 µm thick mesoporous network of
nanocrystalline semiconductor oxide (e.g. titanium dioxide, TiO2) deposited onto a
conducting electrode or transparent conducting electrode (e.g. FTO, ITO etc), and an
electrolyte. The porous network of nanocrystals (10-30 nm) provides the large surface
area necessary for adsorption of a thin layer of dye molecules, typically a
ruthenium(II) bipyridyl dye [24] or an organic dye [21, 25, 26], to allow for optimum
light harvesting. Absorption of light by a dye molecule creates an excited molecular
electronic state. The dye rapidly returns to its original oxidation state via electron
transfer from iodide ions in the I-/I3- redox electrolyte. The I3
- ions formed by oxidation
of I- diffuse a short distance (<50 µm) through the electrolyte to the cathode, which is
coated with a thin layer of platinum catalyst, where the regenerative cycle is
completed by electron transfer to reduce I3- to I- [27].
Two of the most important factors which influence the performance of a DSSC are the
dye used as a sensitiser, and the counter-electrode material. The key properties of the
dye are the absorption across the solar spectrum and the adsorption/adhesion of the
dye molecules to the surface of the semiconductor oxide [28]. The most widely used
sensitizers are those based on heavy transition metal co-ordination compounds (e.g.
ruthenium (Ru) polypyridyl complexes) [23, 29] due to their efficient metal-to ligand
charge transfer, intense charge-transfer absorption across the visible range and long
excited lifetime [23]. However, Ru-polypyridyl based complexes are expensive
(~1200 $/g) [30], and contain a heavy rare earth metal, which is environmentally
undesirable [31]. Thus, investigation into environmentally-friendly, economic and
readily available dyes, including those extracted from plants, remains a strong interest
[21, 25, 26, 32, 33].
Dyes produced from plant extracts are advantageous due to their wide availability,
simple extraction process, usability without further purification, environmental
shows the optical absorbance spectrum of the dispersion diluted to 10 vol% to reduce
scattering losses during measurement, and with the background absorbance from the
solvent and PVP subtracted [74]. The spectrum is mostly featureless as expected, due
to the linear dispersion of Dirac electrons [75]. The peak in the UV region is a
signature of the van Hove singularity in the graphene density of states [75]. Using
α660nm~2460 Lg-1m-1 [11], we estimate the concentration of graphene in the undiluted
dispersion as 0.42 gL-1.
Figure 3 – Optical absorption spectrum of the graphene in dispersion diluted to 10 vol% to avoid scattering effects. Inset – photograph of a cuvette containing the as-prepared graphene ink
The dimensions of the exfoliated flakes are measured via atomic force microscopy
(AFM). The as prepared ink is diluted to 5 vol% and drop-casted onto a Si/SiO2 wafer.
The sample is then annealed at 400oC for 30 minutes, sufficient to decompose any
residual PVP [76] without affecting the graphene flakes [18, 77]. This gives isolated
and polymer free flakes on the substrate, allowing accurate measurement of the flakes.
The flakes are measured using a Bruker Dimension Icon AFM in ScanAsyst™ mode.
The distributions of measured flake thicknesses and lateral dimensions are shown in
Figure 4, along with the images of typical flakes. The average flake thickness is (5.9 ±
0.2) nm, with ~56% of flakes ≤4 nm thick (equivalent to <10 layers, assuming ~0.7
nm measured thickness for a monolayer flake and ~0.35 nm increase for each
subsequent layer) [78]. The average lateral dimension is (196 ± 6) nm. This gives a
relatively high edge to surface area ratio of ~1:17. The disordered sites at the edges of
flakes act as active catalytic sites for the I-/I3- redox couple reaction to carry
photocurrent across the width of the DSSC, making the as-produced graphene ink a
potential counter electrode material for DSSCs.
Figure 4 – AFM characterisation of the dispersed graphene flakes. (a) image and (b) section of a typical graphene flake. Distributions of (c) flake thickness and (d) flake lateral dimensions.
When formulating an ink for inkjet printing, various parameters of the ink govern the
successful formation of droplets. First, the particle size (i.e. graphene flake
dimensions) in the ink must be considered, as large particles in the ink can clog
nozzles, or disrupt the ink flow [19]. The nozzle size of the DMP-2831 used in this
work is 22 µm, significantly larger than the average flake dimension measured via
AFM, confirming that nozzle clogging should not present any issues. Stable drop
generation (single droplet generation for each electrical impulse, without the formation
of satellite droplets) and jetting of ink (avoiding deviation of droplet trajectory) is of
primary importance for high quality inkjet printing. Unstable jetting may lead to
uncontrolled amount of ink deposition on to undesired locations. In inkjet printing, a
figure of merit, Z, is commonly used to consider the printability of inks and is defined
as: Z = (γρa)½/µ where, γ is surface tension of the ink (mNm-1), ρ is the density of ink
(gcm-3), µ is the viscosity of the ink (mPas) and a is the nozzle diameter (µm). As a
rule of thumb, it is commonly accepted that 1 < Z < 14 is required for stable drop-on-
demand inkjet printing [19]. Inks with Z < 1 are too viscous for droplet ejection, while
those with Z > 14 will produce satellite droplets in addition to the primary droplet,
reducing printing reproducibility [19]. We stress that the range of Z values should be
considered as guide only. Inks with Z values outside this range may also be printable,
in particular, by controlling the shape and amplitude of the electrical pulses for droplet
generation.
Figure 5 – Inkjet printing of graphene ink. (a) Jetting process of the ink, showing stable single droplet ejection. (b, c) Printed graphene squares for printing consistency characterisation, showing photograph (b) and
normalised sheet resistance (c) for the electrodes.
To determine the Z value of the graphene-PVP in IPA ink, we measure γ via a pendant
droplet method, and µ using a parallel plate rheometer. Both the measurements are
conducted at room temperature. We measure γ ~28.0 mNm-1 and µ ~2.3 mPas. The
measured density of the ink is ρ ~0.8 gcm-3. With a =22 µm, we calculate Z ~9.6,
falling well into the recommended range for stable jetting. This is confirmed by
experimental results, where we observe consistent single drop ejection for our ink; Fig.
5a. From the position of the droplet at different times after jetting, we calculate an
average jetting speed of (3.44 ± 0.03) ms-1.
We next confirm the uniformity of our print process by preparing an array of
electrodes on a glass substrate. 9 squares of 6 mm x 6 mm are printed at a platen
temperature of 60 oC, as shown in Figure 5b. The printed squares are highly uniform,
showing no coffee-ring effect. After printing, the samples are annealed at 400 oC for
30 minutes to remove residual PVP. The volume of ink printed is sufficient to achieve
a conductive network of graphene flakes through the printed film (i.e. above the
percolation threshold) [56]. The sheet resistance of the electrodes is measured for their
consistency, as shown in Figure 5c. The printed electrodes show good electrical
uniformity, with <5% standard deviation in sheet resistance between them.
4. DSSC fabrication and Photovoltaic characteristics
4.1 DSSC fabrication
Fabrication of a DSSC involves several steps. First, two FTO (fluorine-doped SnO2)
conductive glass substrates (~2 cm × 2 cm, 8 Ω/□, Solaronix) are cleaned in a
detergent solution using an ultrasonic bath for 10 min, rinsed with deionised water and
ethanol, followed by oven drying at 90 oC. One of the FTO substrates is then
immersed in a 40mM aqueous solution of TiCl4 (Sigma Aldrich) at ~70 ºC for 30 min
(for good mechanical adhesion of the TiO2) and washed with deionised water and
ethanol before drying.
The photoelectrode is prepared by depositing a ~9 µm thick TiO2 film of TiO2 paste
(Solaronix) on to the TiCl4 treated FTO conductive glass substrate by doctor-blading.
The active area is ~0.25-0.36 cm2. The electrode is then gradually preheated over a
period of ~60 minutes, and then sintered at 500 ºC for 30 min in air. After cooling to
~80 ºC, the TiO2 electrode is immersed in the dye-ethanol solution for 12–24 h at 50
ºC under gentle magnetic stirring. Next, excess dye is washed away with anhydrous
ethanol.
A standard, platinum based counter electrode is prepared by drop casting ~60 µl of
10mM H2PtCl6–Isopropyl alcohol (Sigma Aldrich) solution onto the other FTO-glass
substrate with pre-drilled holes at room temperature and then heating gradually to
~450 °C for 30 min. The graphene CE is prepared by inkjet printing the graphene ink
on the pre-drilled FTO glass substrate at 60 °C platen temperature. The active
graphene deposited area is 2.0 cm x 1.5 cm, leaving the edge for electrical contact. The
substrate is gradually heated above 150 °C for ~30 mins to improve graphene
adhesion, and to remove the polymer stabilizer. The relative costs of these two
alternative electrodes (as calculated by considering the relative costs of the raw
materials – see Supplementary Information for calculation) are - £14/m2 (solution
processed graphene) and £520/m2 (solution processed platinum), meaning that the
printed graphene electrode represents ~97.3% reduction in materials cost.
The dye-adsorbed TiO2 electrode and the platinum or graphene counter electrode are
assembled into a sandwich-type cell with a 60 µm Surlyn thermoplastic film
(Solaronix) to separate the photoanode and the counter electrode. An Iodolyte Z-50
(Solaronix) electrolyte solution (I-/I3-) is injected into the cell via the back-drilled hole
in the counter electrode. The hole is then sealed using a Surlyn film to complete the
device assembly.
4.2 DSSC photoelectrochemical characterization
An Oriel solar simulator with an AM 1.5 G filter is used as the for white-light source
(100 mWcm-2) for current-voltage characterization of the DSSCs. The light intensity is
measured using a digital light meter. The short-circuit current density (Jsc) is
calculated by dividing the measured photocurrent by the actual active area (~0.36 cm2)
of the solar cell.
The photoelectrical parameters of the graphene ink and platinum counter electrode-
based DSSCs sensitized by the natural and ruthenium dyes, under AM 1.5 (100
mW/cm2) simulated solar illumination are shown in Fig. 6 and Table 2. The results are
averaged from 3 devices, with <5% standard deviation in values between them. The
efficiency (η) and fill factor (FF) are calculated as reported elsewhere [21].
Preliminary tests on the cells show that over a period of 24 hours of measurement, the
devices remain stable with <10% change in the conversion efficiency.
Cells fabricated with graphene inks and sensitized with natural dyes reached an
efficiency (η %) of 0.9, >80% of that of platinum based natural dye cells (η ~1.1%).
Ruthenium based cells with graphene ink electrodes reached (η ~3.0%) ~70% that of
platinum based cells (η ~4.4%).
The open circuit voltage of the graphene natural dye cells yield Voc=580 mV,
representing ~83% of the platinum based cells. For the ruthenium dye based cells,
Voc=640 mV was obtained, ~98% of that for the platinum based cells (650 mV). A
positive shift in the iodide/tri-iodide redox energy level will increase in the open
circuit voltage (Voc) and vice versa, thereby influencing the energy conversion
Table 2: Photoelectrical parameters of DSSCs fabricated with graphene and platinum counter electrodes
Figure 6 - Current-Voltage characteristic curves for (a) graphene ink CE based cells, (b) platinum CE based cells sensitized with (i) P. glaucum (square), (ii) H. sabdariffa (circle), (iii) C. pulcherrima (triangle), and (iv) Ruthenizer N719 (diamond) and (c) Comparison of the efficiencies for platinum and graphene ink based cells.
From the JV curves in Figure 6, it can be deduced that the graphene ink electrode cells
sensitized with ruthenium dyes, exhibit a lower shunt resistance (RSH) and a higher
series resistance (RSE) than the equivalent Pt-based cells. RSH and RSE can be
calculated as [81]:
!!" = !"!"!!!
(2)
!!" = !"!"!!!
(3)
This shows that RSH;Gr ~43.3Ω, and RSE;Gr ~14.6 kΩ, while RSH;Pt ~26.1Ω, and RSE;Pt
~23.9 kΩ. Although this effect negligibly influences the Voc, it influences the Jsc. The
lower RSH for the graphene CEs could be attributed to factors such as current leakage
paths on the graphene based electrodes, while the higher RSE could arise from the
lower conductivity (i.e. higher sheet resistance) of the graphene electrode (600 Ω/□)
compared to that of the Pt based electrode (15 Ω/□), or to slower electro-kinetics in
graphene than in Pt [82, 83].
From the obtained results, it can also be observed that the natural-dye-based DSSCs
produce low efficiencies compared to the inorganic dye (N719) based cells. For a dye
molecule to be an excellent photosensitizer in a DSSC, it must possess several
carbonyl (C=O) or hydroxyl (-OH) groups capable of chelating to the Ti(IV) sites on the
porous nanostructured TiO2 surface. The chemical adsorption of these dye molecules
to the TiO2 nanoparticles in DSSCs occurs generally due to the condensation of the
alcoholic-bound protons with the hydroxyl groups on the surface of the nanostructured
TiO2 as well as the contribution of the chelating effect of the two nearest hydroxyl
group towards Ti(IV) sites on the semiconductor nanocrystalline layer [28,60,84,85]. It
is also very important that the dye molecules do not aggregate (π-π stacking) on the
photoelectrode (TiO2) surface to avoid nonradiative decay of the excited state to the
ground state, which often occurs with thicker films [86]. However, natural or organic
dyes with good intermolecular π-π* interactions help to achieve a closer packing of the
dye molecules on the TiO2 surface and hence better protect the surface from contact
with the electrolyte, thereby resulting in a high open-circuit voltage and hence high
efficiencies [87]. The C. pulcherrima dye comprises carotenoids (Carotene and
Xanthophyll) and anthocyanins while those from H. sabdariffa and P. glaucum have
anthocyanins as their major components. The relatively high efficiency of C.
pulcherrima dye based cells (Gr and Pt CEs) could be attributed to a better
intermolecular π-π* interactions in the dye arising from these carotenoids. We note
that further investigation is required to fully understand the interactions and how they
may be improved. In particular, it is likely that the efficiency could be improved
further by the addition of different stabilizing functional group agents or binders to the
dye molecules. This could be achieved through acid treatments (CH3COOH, HNO3 or
HCl) [88], or the addition of sugar molecules [89] or a co-adsorbent (e.g.
chenodeoxycholic acid) [90].
Changes to the electrolyte and to the exfoliated graphene may also aid the DSSC
efficiency. Cobalt polypyridine complex electrolytes in place of the iodide/triiodide
may improve efficiencies especially in graphene based cells [20, 41]. Meanwhile,
since the catalytic activity of the graphene is key to the device performance, increasing
the density of the catalytic sites (e.g. by chemical functionalisation of the graphene)
may enhance the efficiency, although a balance must be maintained to avoid
excessively lowering the conductivity of the CE.
5. Conclusions
We have demonstrated low-cost, environmentally friendly alternatives for two key
elements of DSSCs. Plant-extract dyes have been used as photosensitisers, in place of
ruthenium-based dyes, where their simple extraction procedure, wide availability, and
environmentally friendly nature make them promising alternative sources of
sensitizers for DSSCs. Meanwhile, inkjet-printed graphene has been used as a counter-
electrode in the place of platinum. A polymer-stabilised isopropanol-based graphene
ink has been developed via UALPE of chemically pristine graphite. The ink is
formulated for inkjet printing, where it shows consistent single-droplet jetting. This,
combined with the low boiling point and low surface tension of the ink allows
repeatable printing onto substrates including FTO/glass used for DSSC fabrication.
The inkjet-printed graphene CEs exhibit promising electrocatalytic activity toward I3/I-
redox couple comparable to the Pt-based CEs. Further studies are now underway into
the kinetics of the dye molecules, device structure and life-time of the fabricated solar
cells. Overall, the low materials cost for the graphene electrodes (~2.7% of the
equivalent solution processed Pt cost) makes them highly attractive for the
development of low-cost DSSCs. These inkjet-printed graphene electrodes may
additionally have wider applications in fully solution processed and printable
perovskite solar cells, allowing their economic fabrication.
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge support from CAPREX, Cambridge Africa Alborada Fund, The
Royal Academy of Engineering through a fellowship (Graphlex), and the Carnegie-
University of Ghana Next Generation of Africa Academics programme.
References
[1] Wang, X., Zhi, L., Tsao, N., Tomović, Ž., Li, J., Müllen, K. Transparent carbon films as
electrodes in organic solar cells. Angew. Chemie. 2008;47; 2990–2
[2] Bae, S., Kim, H., Lee, Y., Xu, X., Park, J.-S., Zheng, Y., et al. Roll-to-roll production of
30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5; 5748
[3] Yang, N., Zhai, J., Wang, D., Chen, Y., Jiang, L. Two-Dimensional Graphene Bridges
Enhanced Photoinduced Charge Transport in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Nano.
Transparent GNP-Pt Ink Catalysts for Flexible Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. J.
Electrochem. Soc. 2015;162;H564–9
[84] Smestad, G.P., “Education and solar conversion: Demonstrating electron transfer”, Sol.
Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998; 55; 157.
[85] Meng, S., Ren, J., Kaxiras, E., Natural dyes adsorbed on TiO2 nanowire for photovoltaic
applications: enhanced light absorption and ultrafast electron injection, Nano Lett. 2008;
8; 3266–3272.
[86] Yum, J.-H., Chen, P., Graetzel, M., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Recent developments in solid-
state dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 699.
[87] Amaresh M., Markus K. Fischer, R., and Bauerle P., Metal-Free Organic Dyes for Dye-
Sensitized Solar Cells: From Structure: Property Relationships to Design Rules Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48; 2474 – 2499.
[88] Hee-Je K., Dong- Jo K., Karthick, S.N., Hemalatha, K.V., Justin Raj C., Youngson C.;
Curcumin Dye Extracted from Curcuma longa L. Used as Sensitizers for Efficient Dye-
Sensitized Solar Cells, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 8 (2013) 8320 – 8328
[89] F. Queiroz, C. Oliveira, O. Pinho, I.M. Ferreira, Degradation of Anthocyanins and
Anthocyanidins in Blueberry Jams/Stuffed Fish, J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57; [22];
10712–10717.
[90] Yinni W., Zhisheng W., Zhongwei A., Xinbing C., Pei, C., and Qianfeng, L., Highly
Efficient Dye-sensitized Solar Cells by Co-sensitization of Organic Dyes and Co-
adsorbent Chenodeoxycholic Acid; Chin. J. Chem. 2014, 32, 474—478
Inkjet-printed graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells
Supplementary Information
David Dodoo-Arhin,a,b Richard C. T. Howe,a Guohua Hu,a Yinghe Zhang,c Pritesh Hiralal,d Abdulhakeem Bello,e Gehan Amaratunga,d and Tawfique Hasan*,a
a Cambridge Graphene Centre, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, UK. b Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, P. O. Box Lg 77, Accra-Legon, Ghana. c Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. d Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, UK. e Department of Physics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.
1. Tennakone, K., Kumara, G.R.R.A., Kumarasinghe, A.R., Sirimanne, P.M., Wijayantha, K.G.U. Efficient photosensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 films by tannins and related phenolic substances. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1996;94;217–20
2. Garcia, C.G., Polo, A.S., Murakami Iha, N.Y. Fruit extracts and ruthenium polypyridinic dyes for sensitization of TiO2 in photoelectrochemical solar cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2003;160;87–91
3. Meng S., Ren J., Kaxiras E. Natural dyes adsorbed on TiO2 nanowire for photovoltaic applications: enhanced light absorption and ultrafast electron injection. Nano Lett. 2008;8;3266–72
4. Dai Q, Rabani J. Photosensitization of nanocrystalline TiO2 films by anthocyanin dyes. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2002;148;17–24
5. Bunghez I.R., Raduly M., Doncea S., Aksahin, I. and Ion, R.M. Lycopene determination in tomatoes by different spectral techniques (UV-VIS, FTIR and HPLC). Dig J Nanomater Biostructures 2011;6:1349–56
6. Lóránd T., Deli J., Molnár P., Tóth G. FT-IR Study of Some Carotenoids. Helv Chim Acta 2002;85;1691–7
7. Luo P, Niu H, Zheng G, et al. From salmon pink to blue natural sensitizers for solar cells: Canna indica L., Salvia splendens, cowberry and Solanum nigrum L. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2009;74;936–42