Top Banner
Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007
41

Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Jan 15, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by

Planetary Nebulae.

Bob O’Dell

University of Chicago

18 April 2007

Page 2: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

NGC 6720-The Ring Nebula

Page 3: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

IC 4406-The Retina Nebula

Page 4: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

NGC 2392The Eskimo Nebula

Page 5: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

NGC 6853 WFPC2

Page 6: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Final.Dec16XV.tif

Page 7: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Helix-Both FOV

Page 8: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Helix Close-up

Page 9: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Helix-Very Closeup

Page 10: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Helix CharacteristicsDistance=213 pc. Angular Size~10’Age ~15,000 years

Well imaged in optical lines (HST-ACS & CTIO-MOSAIC),

infrared (HST-NIC3-H2), and Radio (21-cm of HI, CO)

Page 11: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Ionization Structure

Page 12: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

GO 9489 Slit

Page 13: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Slitless.fourlines

Page 14: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

NewProfiles

Page 15: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

HenneyConstTemp

Page 16: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

HenneyVariableT

Page 17: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Predicting the Surface Brightness of the Knot Cusps.

• The most simplistic model argues that the surface brightness should drop with r-2, which meant this should be the upper limit to an observed SH~-2 relation.

Page 18: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

ObservedSurface Brightness

Page 19: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Predicting the Surface Brightness of the Knot Cusps.

• The most simplistic model argues that the surface brightness should drop with r-2, which meant this should be the upper limit to an observed SH~-2 relation.

• Due to advection of neutral material into the ionized cusp, not all photons reach the ionization front of the cusps (Lopez-Martin et al. 2001, ApJ, 548, 288) so that the upper limit should be lower.

Page 20: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Predicted Surface Brightness

Page 21: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Knot Characteristics

• Total Number about 3,500-20,000.

• Mass from extinction~3x10-5 Suns.

• Total mass about 0.1-0.6 Suns.

• The central star mass is about 0.6 Suns.

• The original mass is about 3 Suns.

• A significant and possibly majority fraction of the mass is concentrated in knots.

Page 22: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Evolution of Knots• Initiated at the ionization front via an

instability (R-T, Capriotti 1973).

• Shaped by the radiation field of the star, starting out as broad and becoming comet-like in appearance.

Page 23: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Final Evolution ofa Central Star.

Page 24: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Shadows behind the Knots.• The first order theory has been worked out

already (Canto et al. 1998, ApJ, 502, 695.

• Since the knots are optically thick to LyC, they cast an ionization shadow.

• Some ionization occurs because of LyC photons scattered by the ambient nebula.

Page 25: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The Bulk of the Mass is in theNeutral Region of the Knots.

• Densities inferred from the optical are about 106 cm-3.

• Only one study of a heavy molecule (CO).

• H2 is expected to be the dominant form of hydrogen in the outer parts of the knots.

Page 26: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The Bulk of the Gas is in the Neutral Region and H2 is the strongest emission from there.

Page 27: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The H2 Levels

Page 28: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The NIC3 FOV inGO 10628

Page 29: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Northern FOV inMultiple Lines.

Page 30: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Profiles of 378-801 in the Emission Lines.

Page 31: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Mechanisms Proposed to Power the H2 Emission.

• Shocks driven by a high velocity wind from the central star.

Page 32: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Mechanisms Proposed to Power the H2 Emission.

• Shocks driven by a high velocity wind from the central star.

• Pumping by the FUV continuum followed by decay (the Solomon process).

Page 33: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The H2 Levels

Page 34: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Mechanisms Proposed to Power the H2 Emission.

• Shocks driven by a high velocity wind from the central star.

• Pumping by the FUV continuum followed by decay (the Solomon process).

• Photodissociation by x-rays followed by collisional heating of the gas.

Page 35: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Mechanisms Proposed to Power the H2 Emission.

• Shocks driven by a high velocity wind from the central star.

• Pumping by the FUV continuum followed by decay (the Solomon process).

• Photodissociation by x-rays followed by collisional heating of the gas.

• Photodissociation by EUV (the LyC) followed by collisional heating.

Page 36: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The Energy Balance.

• IN: X-ray(<124 A) 4x10-11 ergs cm-2 s-1

• IN: FUV (912-1200 A) 7x10-9 ergs cm-2 s-1

• IN: EUV (124-912 A) 8x10-8 ergs cm-2 s-1

• Out: Ionized Gas Lines 5x10-9 ergs cm-2 s-1

• Out:H2 Emission Lines 4x10-9 ergs cm-2 s-1

Page 37: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The Population Distribution.

Page 38: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

The EUV Driven Model.

• This must have a density >105 cm-3.• It must have a collisionally heated gas of about

990 K.• It must have a zone where H2 still exists and yet

there are LyC photons .• The key physics is in advection, which was

necessary for explaining the surface brightness in Ha and the electron temperature increase in the ionized gas zone.

Page 39: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Evolution of Knots-I• Will they survive the expulsion phase?• Almost certainly they will survive the high

LyC luminosity phase of the central star since the photoevaporation time is about 15,000 years and it must decrease as the star gets fainter.

Page 40: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Evolution of Knots-II• The question then is whether they will survive

destruction by the diffuse UV radiation field of the ISM before being incorporated into GMC’s.

• There is ample and growing evidence for small scale structures in the ISM. This process could be the source.

Page 41: Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.

Helix Reading• 3-D Model-O’Dell et al. 2004,AJ,128,2339&

RMxAAC, 23, 5.• 3-D Model-Meaburn et al. 1998,MNRAS,294,201&

2005,MNRAS,360,963.• Knot Ubiquity-O’Dell et al. 2002,AJ,123,3329.• Knot Basics-O’Dell & Burkert, 1997,IAU180, 332.• Detailed Knot Modeling-O’Dell, Henney, & Ferland

2005,AJ,130,172.• H2 Observations-Meixner et al. 2005,AJ,130,1784.

• H2 Energetics-O’Dell, Henney, & Ferland 2007, AJ, 133, 2343.