Top Banner
Inherency Spencer Field Fall 2014
8
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Inherency - Stock Issue in Policy Debate

Inherency Spencer Field Fall 2014

Page 3: Inherency - Stock Issue in Policy Debate

Structural Attitudinal

Page 4: Inherency - Stock Issue in Policy Debate

Gap Existential

Page 5: Inherency - Stock Issue in Policy Debate

“The affirmative team must prove that each significant harm is built into the essential nature of the status quo such as through legal structures and/or societal attitudes.”(CCA Policy Debate Guidelines page 3)

The Real Cause

Page 6: Inherency - Stock Issue in Policy Debate

“Inherency It argues the relationship between the status quo and the probability of future harm”

(CCA Policy Debate Guidelines page 3)

Future Harm

Page 7: Inherency - Stock Issue in Policy Debate

“Inherency: … and will not be solved without the affirmative case.”

CCA Policy Debate FAQ page 3

Self Correcting

Page 8: Inherency - Stock Issue in Policy Debate

“In the need and inherency issues the affirmative has provided many reasons people will resist its plan”

CCA Policy Debate Guidance Information page 6

Revolt