Delivering Aerosol Medication in ICU 18th Aug 2017 Lau Chee Lan Pharmacist HCTM PPUKM ASMIC 2017
Delivering Aerosol Medication in ICU 18th Aug 2017 Lau Chee Lan Pharmacist HCTM PPUKM ASMIC 2017
Aerosol Therapy • Part of the treatment for a variety of respiratory
disease
• * asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
• Offer advantage over systemic therapy
• High concentration in airways
• Fewer systemic side effects
• Require optimal technique for optimal delivery
• delivery of aerosols to critically ill patients is more complex, especially in ventilated patients,
Medication administered as aerosol
Drug class Example
Anti-infective agents Amikacin, Colistin
Bronchodilators Salbutamol, Fenoterol, Salmeterol, Formoterol
Corticosteroids Beclomethasone, Budesonide
Mucolytics Acetylcysteine
Ionic solutions Isotonic sodium chloride
Miscellaneous Tranexemic acid
Ari 2015 Respir Care 2015; 60(6): 858-879
Efficiency of Aerosol Therapy
Drug Deposition in
Lung
Patient
Drug Device
Ventilator circuit &
other parameters
Aerosol particle size & Lung Deposition
(From Gardenhire DS: Rau’s respiratory care pharmacology, ed 8, St. Louis, MO, 2012, Mosby http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/757312_3
Factors affecting aerosol delivery Ventilator Related
Circuit Related
Patient Related
Drug Related Device Related-MDI
Device Related-Nebulizer
Reference: Dhand & Guntur. 2008. Clin Chest Med 29 (2008) 277–296 Ari 2015 Respir Care 2015; 60(6): 858-879
Common Aerosol Devices/ Generator
Type Advantages Disadvantages
MDI - No need drug preparation - Short treatment time - No contamination
-Coordination with inspiration --medium cost
Jet nebulizer Cheap Easy to use
-Inefficient [ droplet > 5um] -Cleaning required -Need additional tubing -Residual volume
Ultrasonic nebulizer
- More efficient than Jet Large residual volume High cost
Vibrating mesh nebulizer
Efficient [ droplet < 5um] -deliver 40-60% drug to lung Easy to use
Not for viscous liquids Cleaning required High cost
Dhanani et al. 2016. Critical Care; 20: 269-284
Ari 2015 Respir Care 2015; 60(6): 858-879
INHALERS
• Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI)/ evohaler
• MDI/ evohaler + Aerochamber/ Optichamber
• Accuhaler
• Turbuhaler
• Handihaler
• Respimat
• Breezhaler
MDI inhalers Bronchodilators
(Reliever)
• Short acting beta-2
agonists
• Short acting anti-
muscarinic
MDI Ventolin (Salbutamol sulfate 100mcg)
MDI Berodual N ( Ipratropium Br 20 mcg, fenoterol HBr 50 mcg)
Controler/Preventor • Inhaled Corticosteroid
MDI Pulmicort
(Budesonide)
MDI Becotide ( Beclomethasone)
DPI: Turbuhaler-controller/preventor
Inhaler / Active ingredient per metered dose
Symbicort 160/4.5 mcg/dose (Budesonide 160 mcg, formoterol 4.5 mcg.)
Symbicort 320/9 mcg/dose (Budesonide 320 mcg, formoterol 9 mcg.)
Inhaler / Active ingredient per metered dose
Seretide 50/250 accuhaler
(Salmeterol xinafoate 50 mcg, fluticasone propionate 250 mcg.)
Seretide 50/500 accuhaler
( Salmeterol xinafoate 50 mcg, fluticasone propionate 500 mcg. )
Spiriva (Tiotropium) 18mcg
Onbrez 150mcg (Indacaterol)
Optimal Technique for using pMDI in ventilated patient
1. Review order, identify patient, and assess need for bronchodilator.
2. Suction endotracheal tube and airway secretions.
3. Shake pMDI and warm to hand temperature.
4. Place pMDI in space chamber adapter in ventilator circuit.
5. ? heat and moisture exchanger.* Do not disconnect humidifier.
6. Coordinate pMDI actuation with beginning of inspiration.
7. Wait at least 15 s between actuations; administer total dose.
8. Monitor for adverse response.
9. Reconnect.
10. Document clinical outcome.
Dhand 2007. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:27–38. Ari et al. 2015. Respir Care; 60(6) 858-879)
Priming and Shaking the Canister
• Prior to first use
• If not used > 24 hours.
• Shake for 3 to 5 times
• Prime by depress the valve several actuation/ puffs
Reference: Fink J, Dhand R. Bronchodilator resuscitation in the emergency department, part 2: dosing. Respir Care. 2000;45(5):497.
Ari et al. 2015. Aerosol Therapy in Pulmonary Critical Care. Respir Care; 60(6) 858-879)
MDI inhalers-controllers/preventors
Inhaled
corticosteroids
with long
acting beta
agonists
(ICS + LABA)
Seretide 25/50 evohaler
(Salmeterol 25 mcg, fluticasone propionate 50 mcg)
Seretide 25/125 evohaler
( Salmeterol 25 mcg, fluticasone propionate 125 mcg)
Why need to shake inhaler
Without shaking, the drug may separate from the propellants in MDI, which reduces aerosol delivery.
Ari et al. 2015. Aerosol Therapy in Pulmonary Critical Care. Respir Care; 60(6) 858-879)
How to tell if inhaler is empty?
A. ? Floating the metal canister in water
B. ? Listening as you shake it
C. ? See if a spray come out
American Thoracic Society. 2014. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, Vol. 190, P5-P6,
Count the puffs Medicine Number of doses per canister
Salbutamol [ Ventolin ] 200
Berodual 200
Seretide [ Salmeterol + Fluticasone] 120
Prescriptions If using Salbutamol T0 change canister after
4 puffs QID [ 16 puffs a day] 200 / 16 12 days
6 puffs 4 hourly [ 36 puffs a day]
200 / 36 5.5 days
6 puffs 2 hourly [ 72 puffs a day]
200 / 72 2.5 days
Arrow towards patients [ For unidirection connector]
Match the canister
Spacers
Uptodate 2017
Synchronize with inspiration onset
• synchronizing the actuation of pMDI with the beginning of inspiration.
• 1 to 1.5 sec delay can reduce the efficiency of drug delivery
• Failure to synchronize can reduce drug mass ( by 35% )
Reference: Diot P, Morra L, Smaldone GC. Albuterol delivery in a model of mechanical ventilation. Comparison of metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer efficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Oct 1995;152(4 Pt 1):1391-1394
Interval between actuation….at 15s • successive actuations of a MDI without an
intervening pause reduced drug delivery
• Puff ------15s-----puff again…..
• Repeat till all puffs prescribed done.
• Ie, 6 puffs will take around 1 min.
Reference: 1. Diot, P., L. Morra, and G. C. Smaldone. 1995. Albuterol delivery in a model of mechanical ventilation: comparison of
metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer efficiency. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 152:1391–1394 2. Fink et al. 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med;159:63–68.
Chambers [non-intubated]
Aerochamber
Optichamber
Not suitable for intubated patients
pMDI with chamber
“ With standardized technique of administration, approximately 11% of dose from pMDI and spacer chamber deposits in the lower respiratory tract of ventilated patients.
This value is remarkably close to values observed (10-14%) with optimal use without spacer in ambulatory patient”
Reference : Dhand et al. 2008. Journal of Aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery. (21) pp 45-60
How effective drug delivery improve patient outcome
Nebulisers
• Jet / Ultrasonic / Vibrating Mesh
• Transform liquid & suspension into aerosol form
• Deliver wider range of drugs than pMDI
• Efficiency :
• ability to generate aerosol of desired particle size
• Optimal droplet size
• Concern
• Inadequate cleaning may lead to pneumonia
Dhanani et al. Critical Care (2016) 20: 269
Comparing Common Aerosol Devices
Type Advantages Disadvantages
Jet nebulizer Cheap Easy to use
-Inefficient [ droplet > 5um] -Cleaning required -Need additional tubing -Residual volume
Ultrasonic nebulizer
- More efficient than Jet Large residual volume High cost
Vibrating mesh nebulizer
Efficient [ droplet < 5um] -deliver 40-60% drug to lung Easy to use
Not for viscous liquids Cleaning required High cost
Dhanani et al. 2016. Critical Care; 20: 269-284
Ari 2015 Respir Care 2015; 60(6): 858-879
Optimal Technique for nebulizing drug in ventilated patients
1. Review order, identify patient, and assess need for bronchodilator.
2. Assess airway, remove excess secretions
3. Place drug in nebulizer [ volume for Jet vs Vibrating mesh]
4. Place nebulizer in inspiratory limb [ 10 to 15 cm from Y piece]*
5. ? HME [ do not disconnect humidifier]*
6. Connect to power source [ for Jet, set gas flow accordingly]
7. Observe aerosol cloud
8. Remove device from the ventilator circuit
9. ? HME*
10. Return ventilator settings and alarms to previous values
11. Monitor patients.
12. Change of expiratory filter*
Dhand 2007. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:27–38. Ari et al. 2015. Respir Care; 60(6) 858-879)
Influence of the nebulizer position
Ehrmann et al. Ann. Intensive Care (2017) 7:78
Nebulizing antibiotics: • Optimal delivery is important!
Efficient Nebulization
Optimal drug deposition in lung
Nebulizing antibiotic
• Prepare solution aseptically
• Prepare freshly just before the nebulisation
• E.g CMS [ prodrug] convert into Colistin [active & toxic form] • Direct Lung toxicity
• Appropriate volume
• Nebulised over 30-60 mins
• Frequency : Amikacin ---- Once daily
CMS ----------- 2 to 3 times daily
Lu Q, Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 184: 106-115.
G Poulakou et al. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 2017; 15: 3, 211-229
Nebulised antibiotic & Expiratory filter
• Monitor for Bronchospasm & obstruction of expiratory filters
• Regular change may be needed
G Poulakou et al. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 2017; 15: 3, 211-229
Ehrmann et al. Ann. Intensive Care (2017) 7:78
Nebulised antibiotic
White crystals on Exhalation membrane
Ghonimat I.M., Nazer L.H., Aqel F., Mohammad M. K., Hawari F. I., Le J. Effect of Nebulized Colistin on the Ventilator Circuit: a Prospective Pilot Case-Control Study from a Single Cancer Center. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis 2015, 7(1): e2015032,
White crystals on flow sensor after nebulized colistin
-Median duration of Neb : 10 days -Median duration to formation of white crystals : 4 days - Change of flow sensor : 82% of case
Conclusion
• Aerosol therapy is frequently used in Critical ill patients
• Essential to optimize as many factors as possible for effective drug delivery
Drug
Deposition in Lung
Patient
Drug Device
Ventilator circuit &
other parameters
Acknowledgement: En. Khairul Mubarak Osman Pn Parimala Devi a/p Munusamy
●1192 physicians in ICU from REVA network ●99% use aerosol therapy in mechanical ventilated
patients ○43% use nebulizers ○55% use MDI inhaler ○Mostly Bronchodilators & steroids ○30% nebulized antibiotics ( 5 patients a year)
Spacers/adapters
Dhand. 2008. Journal Of Aerosol Medicine And Pulmonary Drug Delivery; 21 (1) : Pp. 45–60
Place the space device
Reference: Dhand. 2012. Aerosol therapy in patient receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary delivery; 25(2): 63-78