Infrared Signature Studies of Aerospace Vehicles (Aero-Optics) • MissionAttainment Measure (Offensive) M ss o tta et Measu e (O e s ve) Survivability of Aircraft / Helicopters (Carriers of Offense): Foremost in Design • Parallel devpts. in sensitive detection & tracking systems Dynamic nature of ‘Stealth’ o Rao & Mahulikar (2002) Aeronaut. J. • Passive detection tactically superior / anti-radiation missiles Effectiveness of RADAR is challenged • Low flying mission (RADAR horizon) IRSS, IRCMs mandatory h lk l o Mahulikar et al. (2007) Prog. Aerospace Sci. MANPADS M t i th tt i ti i ft • MANPADS: Most serious threats to aviation in future o Bolkcom et al. (2005) CRS Report for Congress, RL31741
26
Embed
Infrared Signature Studies of Aerospace Vehicles - IIT · PDF fileInfrared Signature Studies of Aerospace Vehicles (Aero-Optics) • MMssoissionA ttatta e tinmentMeasu Measu ere (O(O
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Infrared Signature Studies of Aerospace Vehicles(Aero-Optics)
• Mission Attainment Measure (Offensive)M ss o tta e t Measu e (O e s ve) Survivability of Aircraft / Helicopters (Carriers of Offense): Foremost in Design
• Parallel devpts. in sensitive detection & tracking systemsp g y Dynamic nature of ‘Stealth’o Rao & Mahulikar (2002) Aeronaut. J.
• Passive detection tactically superior / anti-radiation missiles Effectiveness of RADAR is challenged
• Low flying mission (RADAR horizon) IRSS, IRCMs mandatoryh l k lo Mahulikar et al. (2007) Prog. Aerospace Sci.
MANPADS M t i th t t i ti i f t• MANPADS: Most serious threats to aviation in futureo Bolkcom et al. (2005) CRS Report for Congress, RL31741
Sources of IR Signature in Aircrafto Principle: Discriminate ‘Aircraft IR’ with ‘Background IR’o Grey Surface Emission Characteristics
270°Thompson et al. (1999) 7th CASI Propulsion Symp.
IR Detectors & their Constraint on Flight Envelope
o Cooled GaAs / AlGaAs (Aluminum Gallium Arsenide) & HgCdTe (Mercury Cadmium Telluride)(Me cu y Cad u e u de)
o Mid-Wave (3-5 µm) & Long-Wave (8-12 µm) 0.5 μW/m210
Mahulikar et al. (2001) Aeronaut. J.
Long Wave (8 12 µm) o Multi-Colour
Thermal-Imaging Systems
μ
2 μW/m28Thermal Imaging Systems QWIP Technology IR-detection in wider spectrum 2(k
m) 6
IR detection in wider spectrum all aspect spatial map of scene
IRSL = 5 μW/m2
NEI = 50 μW/m2
H(
4
o A/c H ↑• (IR-Det. Sensitivity, M∞) ↑
↑
NEI = 50 μW/m
IR Signal = 200 μW/m2
0
2
• H ↑ w.r.t. Radar-det. 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6M∞
Comparison of NEIs for TJE & TFE on Flight Envelope
NEI for TJENEI for TJE
6
NEI for TFE
With plume IR (3-5 μm) Plume-IR ↓ at M∞ ↑
4
NEI for TJEWithout plume IR (8-12
) C i IR ↓ M ↓H(k
m)
NEI for TFEμm) Casing-IR ↓ at M∞ ↓2
H
0 4 0 8 1 2 1 60 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.60M∞
Mahulikar et al. (2001) Aeronaut. J.
Atmosphere Role: IR-Transmission & IR-Radiance
o CO2, H2O (vap.), O3, & CH4: p, T, & Conc.
o τλ_(λ+dλ): Spectral Distribution of Source IR Radiation & Intensity LOWTRAN (empirical-based program) Rao & Mahulikar (2006) J AircraftLOW N (e p ca based p og a ) 8-14 μm: widest window 1.0
Rao & Mahulikar (2006) J. AircraftLvert = 5 km
o Spectral Distribution of Atmospheric IR Radiance 0.6
0.8
λ)
Mid-latitude summer
thermal emission by gases & sunlight scatteringB ’ d l
0.4
τ λ_(
λ+dλ
Tropical
Berger’s model:Empirical-basedMeasurement of skies 0 0
Role of Earthshine in IRSL (Mahulikar et al. 2009 J. Opt. A)o Earthshine ↑ ⇐ εa/c ↓ (w.r.t. temp. based), 8-12 μm band
IR radiance from earth reflected off aircraft & collected by detector
o εearth(soil type & temp. water body, vegetation, humidity) ∼ 0.93 Hipps (1989) Remote Sensing of Environment
o Non-Lambertian: 8
8-12 μm band, with earthshine
m2 )
Vegetation B.R.D.F.
Nicodemus (1965) 4
8-12 μm band, without (W
/Sr-m
Nicodemus (1965)Appl. Optics
earthshine3-5 μm band, with
th hiCon
trast
εfuse
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
earthshine
3-5 μm band, without
IR C
εMahulikar et al
−4
without earthshine
Mahulikar et al. (2006) J. Aircraft
Analysis & Modeling of IR Signature Sourcesh lo Re-entry Vehicle
Sources: Shock heated air, Heated surface, Ablation products, Wake Prediction: Trajectory i e variation of H M ρ α; Shock structure & B L Prediction: Trajectory i.e. variation of H, M∞, ρ, α; Shock structure & B.L. Prediction of surface temps. by multimode thermal model
o Aircraft (A/c) Engine: Exptl. Measurements( ) Static engine testing - Engine is instrumented in outdoor test facility Wind tunnel testing - Scaled a/c model (prob. stray radiation)
o A/c Sources: Power-Plant, Jet-Nozzle, Exhaust Plume, Airframe Plume - visible from all aspects - 2-5 μm, A/c surfaces – 3-5 & 8-12 μmp μ μ Amount & specific wavelength bands ?
o Aircraft Rear Fuselage: Large area at lower temp.i l l l f d i h i Sources - internal power-plant & external free-stream aerodynamic heating
Earthshine & Skyshine reflections: ε↓ & 8-12 μmo Rear Fuselage Temp. Pred. Multimode Thermal Modelo Rear Fuselage Temp. Pred. Multimode Thermal Model Variations in: a) transport & flow properties with temp. b) cross-sectional
area, c) heat transfer (Rayleigh flow), d) skin friction (Fanno flow)
Jet pipe700
800Dry mode
Skin Temp. PredictionT
(K) 600
Mahulikar et al. (2005) J. Thermophys. & Heat Transf.
Radiation shield
R f l ki400
T 500
Rear fuselage skin
3000.0
L (m)0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0
L (m)
Jet pipe1400Afterburning mode
o Afterburning Mode:
R di ti hi ld
1000
K)
Jet-pipe temp. doubles (Rear-View)
k Radiation shield
Rear fuselage skin600
T( Skin temp. increases
by 70 K (All Aspects)
2000.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0L (m)
Role of Free-stream in Rear Fuselage Skin’s IRSL
o Free-stream as Heatas Heat Source IRSL from
Sink-to-source transition points
Mahulikar et al. (2005) J. Thermophys. & Heat Transf.
IRSL from rear fuselage skin
1.4 Sink-to-source transition line
<
IRSL from 1.2
∞
Free-stream as heat-source: airframe / wings
1.0
M∞ M∞ ↑ (> M∞,trans) & H ↓ (< H∞,trans)
0 8
Free-stream as heat-sink:
M ↓ (< M t ) & H ↑ (> H t )0.8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16H (km)
M∞ ↓ (< M∞,trans) & H ↑ (> H∞,trans)
Estimation of ω(φ)-subtended: Parallel Rays Projectiono Engine Layout (Well-Resolved)
turbine exit discjet nozzle
Mahulikar et al. (2007) Applied Optics
jet- nozzle rear fuselage skin
2
3
/m
1
2
)×10
6Sr
/
0
0 060
80(Ω/l)
0.0
1.00.5
1.520
40JP φ°l (m)
Dgt. sect. ω ↑ & ω > 0 ∀ φ∈[0,90°]2.0 0Cgt. sect.
A/c Plume IRSLVisible from φ ↑; Rad H O (vap ) CO CO; TJE (IRSL ↑) > TFEo Visible from φ ↑; Rad. H2O (vap.), CO2, CO; TJE (IRSL ↑) > TFE
o AR ↑ (Pot. Core)↓ IRSL ↓ (Decher 1981 J. Aircraft)
TJE
TFEHudson Jr. (1969) Infrared System Engg. (Wiley NY)
Spectral Plume IRSL Emitted
160m
) • A/c at zenith over SAM site
120
/m⋅S
r⋅μm • Ipl,λ recd. by SAM: 4.15-4.45 μm band
80nsity
(W/
I pl,λ
40nce
Inte
n
40
Rad
ian
D M d Pl IRSL << t il i & f l IRSL
0 4 8 12 16 200
λ (μm)
o Dry Mode: Plume IRSL << tail-pipe & rear fuselage IRSLo 8-12 μm band: No Gaseous Plume IRSL Mahulikar et al. (2005)
J. Thermophys. & Heat Transf.
V hi l N f N l N l S i B DiParameters Affecting IRSL of Rocket Plume
o Vehicle - No. of Nozzles, Nozzle Spacing, Base Dia.o Ambient - Solar Azimuth / Elevation; Flight - M∞, H, α
E i (N l 1987 J S ft & R k t )o Engine (Nelson 1987 J. Spacecraft & Rockets) Mass flow rate, Propellant type, Oxidizer-to-fuel ratio, Area ratio,
Standard Models for Prediction of IRSLo Models for IRSL from plume, power-plant, & complete aircraft
SIRUS, SIRRM, NIRATAM, SPIRITS, IRSTORM, MIRSAT, OPTASMS US, S M, N M, S S, S O M, M S , O SM
o Models for atmospheric IR transmission & radiance LOWTRAN, MODTRAN, & HITRAN
o Models for processing & generating spatial scene map, wire model SPIRITS, IRST, IIR, EOSAS
o Models for IRSL prediction from ships & ground vehicles SHIPIR, GTSIG, PRISM
NIRATAM (NATO InfraRed Air Target Model 1991)NIRATAM (NATO InfraRed Air Target Model, 1991)o Based on Field Measurements, Theor. Studies, & Data Analysiso Considers IRSL by Internally & Aerodynamically Heated Surfaceso Considers IRSL by Internally & Aerodynamically Heated Surfaces,
Hot Engine Parts, Combustion Gases, Plume Particleso Skyshine (Radiance) Atmospheric Trans Sunshine Earthshineo Skyshine (Radiance), Atmospheric Trans., Sunshine, Earthshine
SIRUS (Spectral Signature Analysis Code)SIRUS (Spectral Signature Analysis Code)o For: Air Breathing & Rocket Motor Propelled Vehicleso Models (Based on B.R.D.F.):o Mode s ( ased o ) surface temperature, surface reflectance, cavity physics, plume gas
IR Counter-Measures (IRCMs)Mahulikar et al. (2007) Prog Aerospace Sci
Passive Active
Prog. Aerospace Sci.
IR Suppressors /Optimizers
IR: Flares, Jammers, Pyrotechnic Decoys,Lamp on Sacrificial StructureOptimizers
Obj. to minimize a/c IRSL
Lamp on Sacrificial Structure
Obj. to confuse IR seeker by IRObj. to minimize a/c IRSL Obj. to confuse IR seeker by IR jamming / luring away towards false target / sacrificial structurePassive Countermeasures
o R ∝ (IRSL)½ IRSL ↓o RLO ∝ (IRSL)½ IRSL ↓ Minimise penalties: back-pressure, wt. cost,
complexity, drago Techniques:
Conceal hot engine parts; Peak temp. reduction of exhaust gases
IR-Suppressor for HelicopterM h lik t l (2008) Jreduction of exhaust gases
Camouflage IR by modifying exposed temp. Reducing reflectivity of reflecting surfaces
Mahulikar et al. (2008) J. Propulsion Power
Modification to Exhaust Systemo D.R.E.S. Canada: F.C.T. & C.B.T.o Characteristics of Typical Patented IRSS System: Efficient mixing / pumping of plume with ambient Engine temperature reduction by fuel coolingFuselage IRSSFuselage IRSS:
Aircraft skin heating / cooling, Emissivity optimisation10o Penalties of IR Signature
8
0
8-12 μmo Penalties of IR Signature
Suppressors (IRSS)– Wt.
Mahulikar et al. (2006) J. Aircraft
4
6R L
O(k
m)
– Complexity– Changes to nozzle
geometry
2
4
3-5 μmgeometry
– Power losso Mission Power = Engine Power
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00
εfuse
o g − Power for IRSS Penalties
Active Countermeasureso IR jammers, IR flares as decoyso Smart jammers: non-directional / directional (DIRCM)( )o MAWS: Radar, IR Detectors (scanning & staring), UV detectorso High altitude flight to avoid detectiong g
Counter-Countermeasures (C2M)Counter Countermeasures (C M)o to counter active & passive IRCMs increasingly sensitive IR sensors ; imaging seekers increasingly sensitive IR sensors ; imaging seekers high speed temporal processing (to minimise reaction time) multiple attack multiple attack
Conclusions IR SignaturesConclusions IR Signatures →→ PassivePassiveConclusions: IR Signatures Conclusions: IR Signatures →→ PassivePassive
o Missiles: fire & forget capability portable lethal↑o Missiles: fire-&-forget capability, portable, lethal↑ IR-detection / guidance up to terminal phase (unlike mono-static radar)
o Fuselage: Main Source for 8-12 μm; A/c Plume: for 4.15-4.20 μmg μ ; μo Background IR-Radiance (+ve & -ve contrast)o Earthshine ↑: Rear Fuselage → (ε & H) ↓o Divergent-Nozzle: Imprudent → From Rear Aspecto Nozzle Shape Modification:
↑ notching / corrugating; aspect ratio ↑; retrofit deviceso IRSL ↓ with (Performance Penalties) ↓ e.g. Emissivity Optimization
Next Gen IR Imaging Sys → multi λ spatial detectiono Next Gen. IR Imaging Sys. → multi-λ spatial detection large area, multi-spectral / multi-colour staring arrays / immune to IRCM