Top Banner
Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011
20

Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Dec 15, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Informed consent:What if I get it wrong?

Greg HillACLCA – 17 February 2011

Page 2: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Disclaimer

• This presentation has been prepared for the purpose of awareness raising and general discussion

• The EPA strongly recommends that consultants and auditors, before undertaking sampling on a persons land, obtain legal advice on the risk to themselves in undertaking the work, including in the areas discussed in this presentation.

• The contents of this presentation should not be relied up on for the purpose of assessing this risk.

Page 3: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Introduction

• There are various circumstances in which sampling may be undertaken

• Certain information must be brought to the attention of the EPA

• The EPA can gain information by other means• What will the EPA do with the information that you provide to

it?• EPA public register and Section 7 obligations• What does this mean for the consultant?• What does the EPA do if it needs to sample in these

circumstances?

Page 4: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Types of sampling

• Onsite – the client’s property• Offsite – public land (typically council, DTEI)• Offsite – private land

• Soil• Groundwater• Soil vapour• Ambient or indoor air

• Found something………..

Page 5: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Duty to notify

• s83A – site contamination that affects or threatens groundwater

• Auditor – significant hazardous circumstances (see audit guidelines)

• s83 – serious or material harm

Page 6: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

How might the EPA gain information?

• The EPA may receive a copy of consultant’s report as a result of:– Development application– Request to an owner/occupier for information about site

contamination or the environmental condition of the land– Submission to the EPA as a requirement of licence

condition– Information discovery order– s83A Duty to notify (from others reviewing the work)

Page 7: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

How might the EPA gain information?

• The EPA may receive a copy of consultant’s report as a result of:– Voluntary proposal for site contamination assessment or

remediation– Issuing of site contamination assessment order or site

remediation order– Appendix to an audit report– Transfer of liability agreement (s103E)– Client/potential owner decides discuss the issue voluntarily– Fell off the back of a truck?

Page 8: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

How might the EPA gain information?

• Information comes to the attention of the EPA in a variety of ways…..You should assume that the EPA will receive a copy of the report at some stage in the future!

• Note the ‘honesty in reporting’ provisions (s103ZA and 103ZB)

Page 9: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

EPA assessment of information

For all information that the EPA receives, it is required to make certain determinations:

1. Does the information constitute serious or material environmental harm:

• actual or potential harm to human health or the environment that is not trivial

• environmental nuisance of a high impact or on a wide scale

• results in potential loss or property damage, including the cost of assessment or remediation, in excess of $5k in aggregate

Page 10: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

EPA assessment of information

2. If the information is submitted in accordance with s83A, is it a valid notification?

3. For information that is submitted in accordance with s103E, does it support a valid agreement?

Page 11: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

EPA Public Register

• The EPA must record:– s109(3)(h), details of serious or material environmental

harm– s109(3)(i), details of site contamination notified to the

Authority under section 83A (actual or potential harm to groundwater)

– s109(3)(ia), reports relating to orders – well, almost all orders (EPO, CUO, CUA, SCAO, SRO)

Page 12: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

EPA Public Register

• The EPA must record:– s109(3)(ib), details of agreements under S103E – including

supporting environmental reports that document the site contamination that the agreement relates to

– s109(3)(if), site contamination audit reports– other information - as prescribed

• So if you find site contamination, and the information finds its way to the EPA, which it probably will, it’s likely to end up on the Public Register

Page 13: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

EPA obligations

• Land & Business (Sales & Conveyancing) Act:– Property interest report required by law to be provided at

the time of sale of land under the LABSAC– Information required to be disclosed in the property interest

report is prescribed by regulations– The EPA is required to answer a number of questions in

relation to this for every property that is sold in South Australia

– Everything that is on the Public Register will be brought to the attention of a prospective purchaser. The purchaser can then choose to access the information via the public register.

Page 14: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Land owner v’s consultant

• The owner may not be aware that work you have done can (or must) be added to the Public Register

• The owner may not be aware that the EPA has a mandatory duty to disclose this information under certain routine circumstances

• This disclosure could really annoy a land owner if it reduces (or is perceived to reduce) the value of their property and they weren’t aware that the information would be made available to prospective purchasers!

Page 15: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

LABSAC – Vendor questions

• The vendor of property is also obliged to answer a number of questions.

• In particular, they must disclose the existence of any reports about the environmental condition of the land

• they must disclose whether any potentially contaminating activities have previously been undertaken on the land

Page 16: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

So in Summary….

• You sampled on someone else’s land• You found something that must be reported to the EPA

(s83A?)• The EPA assessed the information and placed it on the Public

Register• The person whose land you sampled receives a letter from

the EPA - that the EPA has details of groundwater contamination, or serious or material environmental harm, and that this information has been placed on the Public Register

Page 17: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

So in Summary….

• The person whose land you sampled on decides to sell their property

• The Property Interest Report shows the EPA has flagged the property for serious or material environmental harm

• The person whose land you sampled rings you and wants to be compensated because they weren’t aware that this could happen when you knocked on their door requesting permission to sample on their land and they agreed…..

Page 18: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Risk mitigation

• Informed consent…….• Inform the landowner of the risks that may result to them from

the sampling• Receive signoff from the landowner of acceptance of those

risks• Seek specific legal advice when relevant

Page 19: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Consent Form for Residents Taking Part In Soil Vapour Assessment

I the owner of the following property (name)___________________________________________________________of

(address)___________________________________________________________ consent to allow an investigation at the above address to determine if vapours are present in soils on my property.

I consent to staff from the Environment Protection Authority, the Department of Health and a Drilling Contractor, entering my property to assess for the presence of soil vapours.

I understand that the EPA and the Department of Health will keep me informed of any further relevant information relating to this issue and provide further advice on any subsequent actions that may need to be taken.

I understand that if the assessment of soil vapours does proceed and the results indicate that serious or material environmental harm exists at my property, the Environment Protection Act 1993 requires that this information be recorded on a public register and would be available to the public through direct enquiry to the EPA. I also understand that this information would also be disclosed to prospective purchasers of my property via the ‘statement of environmental particulars’ contained within the statement under section 7 of the Land and Business (Sales and Conveyancing Act) 1994.

Signature of property owner________________________________________________

Name printed: ________________________________ Date ___________________________

Signature of witness_________________________________________________

Name printed: ________________________________ Date ___________________________

House address:___________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Consent form (example)

Page 20: Informed consent: What if I get it wrong? Greg Hill ACLCA – 17 February 2011.

Questions?