Informational Comparative Science

8/14/2019 Informational Comparative Science

1/183

InformationalComparative Space

Marcus Wilson


2/183

2

2004 - 2006 by Marcus Wilson, All Rights Reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or

mechanical, including photocopying, recording without written permission by the author.


3/183

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction 6

The Two Dimension of Human Reasoning 7Description 8Kinds Space 9Relations Space 12Comparative Space 14Kinds Integration 15Relations Integration 16Comparative Integration 17Kinds Division 18Relations Division 19Comparative Division 20Kinds Awareness 21Relations Awareness 23

Comparative Awareness 24Kinds Levels of Composition 26Relations Levels of Composition 28Comparative Levels of Composition 30Kinds Space Nested Patterns 32Relations Space Nested Patterns 33Comparative Space Nested Patterns 33Kinds Transitivity 34Relations Transitivity 35Comparative Transitivity 38Kinds Relationship Measurement 39


4/183

4

Relations Relationship Measurement 39Comparative Relationship Measurement 40Kinds Order 41Relations Order 43Comparative Order 45Kinds Quantity 46Relations Quantity 47Comparative Quantity 47Kinds Density 48

Relations Density 49Comparative Density 49Kinds Common Description 50Relations Common Description 60Comparative Common Description 66Kinds Uncommon Description 74Relations Uncommon Description 75Comparative Uncommon Description 77Kinds Main Parts 78Relations Main Parts 80Comparative Main Parts 81The World of Comparative Units 81Building Comparative Units 108

The Warping of the Dimensions 136Rotating Comparative Units 145Comparative Locative Correspondence 148Deductive Certainty and Uncertainty 149Explaining Itself 151


5/183

5

The Law of Comparative Wholeness 152The Absolutes of Comparative Space 154Glossary 156List of Principles 159Appendix 166


6/183

6

IntroductionBeginning in May of 2000 is when I first began my search for comparing

knowledge. The principles such as that of the telescope I attempted to expand.So that is when I spent nearly a year attempting to substitute the telescopeprinciple into other mediums of knowledge.

However, in order to do so successfully, I knew that not only did the waysof the principle need to be discovered, but the fundamental principle of everything in Universe. Prior to that, I knew that there appeared to be somefundamental concept that everything was analogous to.

Therefore, in an explicit attempt to find and discover this, Ive spent a goodbit of almost 4 long years. I knew that I didnt want to spend 10 to 12 yearssearching for it, so that is when I began to maximize most of my time and do soin the best way that I understood possible.

So now I must say that after the years of observation of all knowledge inthe Universe, and of the years of reasoning by day and night, that I havediscovered the fundamental analogy of the Universe. Within the contents of thisbook, I will reveal that fundamental metaphor of everything in our existence.

With this fundamental metaphor, just as we can compare the growthconcept to all living plants and animals that grow and produce fruit; or just as wecan compare the circulation concept to all kinds of systems, such as: the solar system, the galaxies, the stars, and even our bodies (the circulatory system andall the other various systems), so with this fundamental metaphor we are able tocompare to all knowledge in the Universe.

Within the contents of this book, for easy understanding, I have describedthe main principles, or knowledge, that I have come to associate with it toward itsdevelopment. And towards the end of the book, I will describe its ability toexplain itself; the negative or reverse aspect of the principles; various futureapplications; and the final law that I have come to associate with it in its entirety.

I fancy you enjoy all that is therein and see the world in a new light andachieve higher levels of understanding by the principles.

Marcus WilsonMay 2004


7/183

7

The Two Dimensions of HumanReasoning

There exist two dimensions of human reasoning that work together tocreate comparative space: Kinds space and Relations space.

During the search for the fundamental analogy/metaphor of the Universe, Ihave come to notice that there are two main dimensions of human reasoning thatwork together to create Comparative Space.

The first dimension is Kinds Space :

This is the knowledge of similarities and differences. It is the knowledge

variations and constants. It is the knowledge of identical things and non identicalthings. Kinds Space is more associated with the differences and similarities of things varying in quality and quantity.

The second dimension is Relations Space .

This is the knowledge of interconnections and separations. It is theknowledge of parts and wholes of systems. It is the knowledge of workingtogether and independents. Relations Space is more associated with theproximities and distances of things varying in space and time.

Kinds Space times Relations Space is Equal to Comparative Space

In mathematics, the area of shape is defined as the length times the width.In the following example, we can see that the length is the horizontal extension of the figure, and the height is the vertical extension of the figure. When they aremultiplied together, the area of the two dimensional figure is created.

Comparative Space , as it is ordered in cells, is as the two dimensionalfigure, or extension, although it can be comprised of more dimensions. KindsSpace is organized vertically while Relations Space organized horizontally (or atleast that they are perpendicular to each other). As length times width equals thearea of the two dimensional space, so Kinds Space times Relations Space isequal to Comparative Space.


8/183

8

The two dimensions are interchangeable.

This means that the kinds within Kinds Space are also relations. Likewise,the relations within Relations Space are also kinds. In the proceeding chapters,

Kinds Space and Relations Space are going to be described as being separate,even though they are interchangeable and both aspects of each other. Moreabout their interchangeability is described in The Warping of the Dimensionssection.

Just as the 3 dimensions of space are all interchangeable, being aspectsof each other, so the two dimensions of Comparative Space are illusively bothaspects of each other.

Description

Anything that we can know or understand we can give a correspondingdescription using symbolic forms.

With all the types of books written by mankind, all of them containdescription. There are physics books, mathematical books, encyclopedia books,economics books, astronomy books, biology books, psychology books,philosophy books, and so on. All of these contain description. Everything thatwe can know or understand we can give a corresponding description usingsymbolic forms.

This is how we are able to write and explain what we learn of the world.Without description, we would not be able to relate to others, or teach them whatwe've come to know and understand. By giving things names, it allows our minds to grab certain objects, concepts, and ideas in a corresponding manner.

Here are some examples of objects, concepts, or ideas we call by name(and as we can see, it can be ANYTHING that we know or understand):


9/183

9

A book is something that we can know or understand. We give it thename 'book' as a corresponding description in symbolic form.

A planet is something that we can know or understand. We give it thename 'planet' as a corresponding description in symbolic form.

An equation is something that we can know or understand. We give it thename 'equation' as a corresponding description in symbolic form.

Gravity is something that we can know or understand. We give it thename 'gravity' as a corresponding description in symbolic form.

Love is something that we can know or understand. We give it the name'love' as a corresponding description in symbolic form.

A dream is something that we can know or understand. We give it the

name 'dream' as a corresponding description in symbolic form.

Kinds SpaceEverything is different.

One of the most fundamental and well-known principles in the Universe isthat everything is different.

The Universe is composed of a various array of things varying in size,shape, complexity, color, texture, patternwith no two things being exactly alike.A human being based on finite perception may consider that two things in thisphysical universe are exactly like but by looking closely, even on smaller andsmaller scales, he will find that no two things contain the exact identity.

In the early 1900s a scientist by the name of Wilson A. Bentley didexperiments with snowflakes collecting the patterns of the various formsproduced year after year. Of the collective accumulation of his discoveries, hecame to notice that no two snowflakes are alike. He realized that there is somedegree of difference between all of them making them to not be identical in anyway or form. There are some snowflakes that are very similar to others, but if youlook very carefully, they will come out to be completely different. Only byobserving carefully, or by having a means of a microscope, or other amplifyingmethods, can one truly see the difference of all unique things.

By this observation (as we will see in the later chapters of this book) wecan notice that there exists a principle in the Universe. Not only are allsnowflakes unique, but all things are unique: each moment, in certain conditions,at certain times; and in certain places snowflakes form. Each time they areproduced, not one snowflake turns out to be exactly alike. This is an example of the uniqueness principle.

Now when we look at our earth, we can clearly see the various arrays of animals; the varying array of environments; the varying array of mountains. The


10/183

10

uniqueness principle states that animals, environments; and mountains are of nodifference than snowflakes. Each time new plants are formed under certainconditions and at certain times, they are shaped with their own individuality or uniqueness.

There are trees that look very similar to each other, but if we were to lookvery carefully, there would be some degree of difference.

There are plants and flowers that look almost identical to each other, butthere are no two that are exactly identical.

There are mountains throughout our Universe that may look or appear tobe alike, but the evolution of different places in space and time of eachthing assures them to have at least some slight bit of difference.

With the entire humans population both present, past, and future it is

widely known that no two fingerprints are exactly alike. Everyone has his or her own fingerprint. Just as with snowflakes, there are some very similar, so alsothere are people who have very similar fingerprints but no two are of exactidentity. Even the genetic code of each human is slightly different, but no two of equal identity. In the case of twins, it may appear that they may have the samegenetic code, but by observing it down to the structure we will notice that there issome slight but of difference.

Not only does everyone have their own finger print, but everyone has their own hand; everyone has their own brain; their own consciousness; their ownheart; their own arms; their own personality; their own body, and so on.

When things are in difference places and at different times, it is onlyobvious that they are under different circumstances, and thus they must comeout to be different according to their place in space and time.

No two snowflakes are alike, no to fingerprints are alike; no two personsare alike; no two things in our Universe are exactly alike. With this principle wecan come to understand the uniqueness and differences in our every day life.

Everything is similar.

As previously explained, there is the principle that everything is different.However, not only is everything different, but everything is also similar. Things inthis Universe are not 100% different that they don't have at least some degree of similarity.

Even though the Universe is composed of a various array of things varyingin size, shape, complexity, color, texture, patternwith no two things beingexactly alike, all those varying array of things are similar to each other in someway or form. A human being based on finite perception may consider that twothings have no similarities but by looking closely, he will find that no two thingsare so different that they don't have some degree of similarity.


11/183

11

Now when we look at our earth, we can clearly see the various arrays of animals; the varying array of environments; the varying array of mountains. Theuniversal similarity principle states that animals, environments; and mountains allhave some degree of similarity. Each time new plants are formed under certainsimilar conditions and at certain times, they are also shaped with similarities.

Gravity and water appear to be very different from each other, but if wewere to look closely, there would be some degree of similarity.

The nervous system and circulatory system may appear to be verydifferent from each other, but if we were to look closely, there would besome degree of similarity.

A thought and a nail may appear to be very different from each other, butif we were to look closely, there would be some degree of similarity.

The mind and the universe may appear to be very different from eachother, but if we were to look closely, there would be some degree of similarity.

Just as nothing is exactly identical that it doesn't have some degree of difference, so two things are so different that they don't have some degree of similarity.

There are mountains throughout our Universe that may look or appear tobe different, but the evolution of similar places in space and time of eachthing assures them to have at least some slight bit of similarity.

When things are in similar places and at similar times, it is only obviousthat they are under similar circumstances, and thus they must come out to besimilar according to their place in space and time.

No two snowflakes are alike, but so also every snowflake is similar.

No to fingerprints are alike; but so also every fingerprint is similar.

No two persons are alike; but so also every person is similar.

With this principle we can come to understand the commonalities andsimilarities of things in our every day life.


12/183

12

Relations SpaceEverything is divided.

Another one of the fundamental principles is that the Universe isextension. It extends in space. It extends in time. The Universe extends invarious other forms of extension.

What two things do we know of that share the exact same place in spaceand/or time?

Our bodies are composed of countless molecules all being dividedby space:

Our heads are at different locations than our arms.

Our legs are at different locations than our lungs.

Our eyes are at different locations than our ears.

Each cell on our bodies are location at different locations in the body.

Our bodies are also composed of countless molecules all beingdivided by time :

Ten years ago, you had different cells in your body than they were today.

The cells in your future will be different than the ones you have in your present.

Each time each molecules in your body moves to a new location, the wayit was in its previous location is no different in its present.

Your body is different than it was 5 minutes ago; 5 years ago; and differentfrom when you were born.

Not only is our bodies divided in space and time, but also theuniverse and all within it:

Our galaxy, the Milkyway, is composed of many star systems. However,each of those systems has their own place within the galaxy. No two of the star systems are at the same place and time at any given time. There is space inbetween every star system. And even with all the stars systems in the Universe,we know they may contain planets. However, each of those planets within eachof the star systems is divided by portions of space. And each within each of theplanets it is composed of parts, which are each, divided little portions of space.And it goes down on smaller and smaller scales.


13/183

13

With the extension of time, we can observe an object moving through our field of vision. But of that complete event, it is composed of even smaller eventsdivided in time, and even more events divided in time.

Even the thoughts we produce are divided by space and time. No twothoughts have the exact same place in spacetime; the earth is rotating and

revolving each minute, as well as the entire solar system it is in, the galaxy, theconstellation, and all of the cosmos.As we can see, just as everything is different, so also everything is

divided. No two things are in the exact same place at the exact same time. Bythis principle we can come to know and understand the unique locations of thingsin our every day life.

Everything is connected.

Even we've noticed that everything is divided, so also everything isrelated. Everything is interdependent and connected. We know that the

Universe is extension. It extends in space. It extends in time. But things are notso divided 100% that they don't have some degree of interconnection.What two things do we know of that are so distant and space-time that

they do not affect each other?

Our bodies are composed of countless molecules all being dividedby space, but yet all connected as well:

Our heads are at different locations than our arms; however, they are allconnected to the body.

Our legs are at different locations than our lungs; however, they are allconnected to the body.

Our eyes are at different locations than our ears; however, they are allconnected to the body.

Each cell in our bodies is at different locations; however, they are allconnected within the body.

Our bodies are also composed of countless molecules all beingdivided by time, but yet all are connected as well :

Ten years ago, you had different cells in your body than they were today;however, they are all related to each other, as they affect each other throughout time.

The cells in your future will be different than the ones you have in your present; however, they will still affect each other even though they aredivided by time.


14/183

14

Each time each of the molecules in your body moves to a new location,the way it was in its previous location is no different in its present;however, they still affect each other, even though they are divided by time.

Your body is different than it was 5 minutes ago; 5 years ago; and differentfrom when you were born, however, at each of those times, it wasimportant for them to affect each of those times.

Not only does our body contain things that are divided, but yetconnected in space and time, but also the Universe and all within it isconnected and related:

Our galaxy, the Milkyway, is composed of many star systems. Even thoueach of those systems are divided within the galaxy, no two of the star systemsare so divided that they don't have some degree of connection.

There is space in between every galaxy, yet there is interconnectivitybetween every galaxy.

There is space in between every star system, yet there is interconnectivitybetween every star system.

There is space in between every planet, yet there is interconnectivitybetween every planet.

There is space in between every molecule, yet there is interconnectivitybetween every molecule.

Even though the thoughts we produce are divided by space and time, notwo thoughts are so divided that they don't have so degree of influence or connectivity.

As we can see, just as everything is divided, with no two things being inthe exact same place in space-time; so also everything is connected, with no twothings being so divided that they don't have some degree of relatedness.

Comparative SpaceEverything being unique and alike, divided and related creates

Comparative Space.

The Universe contains the differences and similarities of qualities andquantities, and it contains the divisions and relations of space and time. Of thesetwo observations, we can see how both of them together create the combination


15/183

15

of things being different and similar and divided and related. This is ComparativeSpace. It is when things are different and similar and divided and connected.

A group of many kinds of fish may all be different and similar to eachother, but also each of their parts that they are composed of is divided and

related. The difference and similarities is vertical and their dividednessand relatedness is horizontal.

A group of many universes may all be different and similar to each other,but also each of their parts that they are composed of is divided andrelated. The difference and similarities is vertical and their dividednessand relatedness is horizontal.

A group of many kinds of people may all be different and similar to eachother, but also each of their parts that they are composed of is divided andrelated. The difference and similarities are perpendicular to their

dividedness and relatedness.A group of many kinds of houses may all be different and similar to eachother, but also each of their parts that they are composed of is divided andrelated. The difference and similarities is one way; their dividedness andrelatedness is the opposite way.

A group of many planets may all be different and similar to each other, butalso each of their parts that they are composed of is divided and related.The difference and similarities are perpendicular to their dividedness andrelatedness.

Comparative Space is a combination of Kinds Space and RelationsSpace. We know that everything is unique and similar. We know that everythingis divided and related. Therefore, everything is uniquely and similarly dividedand connected or divided and connectively unique and similar a combination of the two.

Kinds IntegrationOur mind has the ability to group together things that are unique as if they

were alike.

Kinds Integration is the ability to group things that are different in thisUniverse as if they were alike. As previously iterated, the universe isdifferentiated in qualities and quantities. However, even though all things aredistinct, our mind is able to group together things as if they were not distinct: butas if they were alike.


16/183

16

There are many kinds of people on this earth; however, no two people areof exact identity. Nonetheless, we are able to group together those peoplewe deem most alike in relation to all the others.

There are many kinds of cars; however, no two cars are of exact identity.

Nonetheless, we are able to group together those cars we deem mostalike in relations to all the others.

There are many kinds of inventions; however, no two inventions are of exact identity. Nonetheless, we are able to group together thoseinventions we deem most alike in relations to all the others.

There are many kinds of galaxies; however, no two galaxies are of exactidentity. Nonetheless, we are able to group together those galaxies wedeem most alike in relations to all the others.

There are many kinds of colors; however, no two colors are of exactidentity. Nonetheless, we are able to group together those colors wedeem most alike in relations to all the others.

There are many kinds of brains; however, no two brains are of exactidentity. Nonetheless, we are able to group together those brains wedeem most alike in relations to all the others.

Kinds Integration is the ability to group together things that are unique as if they are alike, or more similar in relation to all other things that are moredifferent.

Relations IntegrationOur mind has the ability to group together things that are divided as if they

were related.

Relations Integration is the ability to group things that are divided in thisUniverse as if they were connected. As previously iterated, the universe isdivided in space and time. However, even though all things are divided, our mindis able to group together things as if they were not divided: but as if they wererelated.

There are many biological cells on earth; however, no two biological cellsare in the exact same space-time. Nonetheless, we are able to grouptogether by Relations Integration those biological cells we deem closesttogether in space-time in relation to all the others. A specific plant, fish,bird, or human would all be examples of specific Relations Integrations of all the divided biological cells on earth.


17/183

17

There are many water molecules on earth; however, no two molecules arein the exact same space-time. Nonetheless, we are able to grouptogether by Relations Integration those molecules we deem closesttogether in space-time in relation to all the others. A specific ocean, sea,

river, or lake would all be examples of specific Relations Integrations of allthe divided water molecules on earth.

There are many thoughts on earth; however, no two thoughts are in theexact same space-time. Nonetheless, we are able to group together byRelations Integration those thoughts we deem closest together in space-time in relation to all the others. A specific book, speech, painting, or dream would all be examples of specific Relations Integrations of all thedivided thoughts on earth.

There are many events in the universe; however, no two events are in the

exact same space-time. Nonetheless, we are able to group together byRelations Integration those events we deem closest together in space-time in relation to all the others. A specific holiday, movie, time frame, or song would all be examples of specific Relations Integrations of all thedivided events in space-time.

Relations Integration is the ability to group together things that are dividedas if they are connected, or closer together in space-time in relation to all other things that are more divided.

Comparative IntegrationOur mind has the ability to group together things that are distinct and

divided into comparatives.

Comparative Integration is the ability of our minds to group together things that are distinct and divided into comparatives. As previously iterated, TheUniverse contains the differences of qualities and quantities, and it contains thedivisions of space and time. Comparative Integration is a combination of KindsIntegration and Relations Integration. Examples would be:

There are many different kinds of houses. Each of those houses isdifferent in quality and quantity, and each of those houses is divided inspace and time. Our mind has the ability to group together those housesby Kinds Integration and each of their parts by Relations Integration andtherefore group their similarities and parts with Comparative Integration.

There are many different kinds of mountains. Each of those mountains isdifferent in quality and quantity, and each of those mountains is divided in


18/183

18

space and time. Our mind has the ability to group together thosemountains by Kinds Integration and each of their parts by RelationsIntegration and therefore group their similarities and parts withComparative Integration.

There are many different kinds of computers. Each of those computers isdifferent in quality and quantity, and each of those computers is divided inspace and time. Our mind has the ability to group together thosecomputers by Kinds Integration and each of their parts by RelationsIntegration and therefore group their similarities and parts withComparative Integration.

There are many different kinds of stories. Each of those stories is differentin quality and quantity, and each of those stories is divided in space andtime. Our mind has the ability to group together those stories by KindsIntegration and each of their parts by Relations Integration and therefore

group their similarities and parts with Comparative Integration.Comparative Integration is the ability of our mind to group together things

that are different and divided as if they are alike and related, or closer together inquality-quantity and space-time in relation to all other things that are moredifferent and divided.

Kinds DivisionOur mind has the ability to divide apart things that are alike as if they were

distinct.

Kinds Division is the ability to divide things that are more alike in thisUniverse as if they were divided. As previously iterated, we are able to grouptogether things as if they are alike. However, our mind is also able to divide apartthings that are very similar as if they are not very similar at all.

There are various colors of red. Although two colors may appear to beidentical, by observing them carefully, we are able distinguish betweenthem and notice their differences.

There are various types of lions. Although two lions may appear to beidentical, by observing them carefully, we are able distinguish betweenthem and notice their differences.

There are various types of voices. Although two voices may appear to beidentical, by observing them carefully, we are able distinguish betweenthem and notice their differences.

There are various types of ants. Although two ants may appear to beidentical, by observing them carefully, we are able distinguish between


19/183

19

them and notice their differences.

There are various types of experiences. Although two experiences mayappear to be identical, by observing them carefully, we are abledistinguish between them and notice their differences.

Kinds Division is the ability of our minds to divide apart things that arealike as if they were different.

Relations DivisionOur mind has the ability to divide apart things that appear to be connected

as if they were divided.

Relations Division is the ability to divide things that are related in thisUniverse as if they were separate. As previously iterated, the Universe isconnected and close within space and time. However, even though all thingsclose in space and time, our mind is able to divide apart things as if they were notconnected or related.

There are many biological cells in our body; however, no two biologicalcells are so close that we can't notice that they are divided by space andtime. We are able to separate those biological cells we deem very closeby Relations Division.

There are many water molecules in a body of water; however, no twowater molecules are so close that we can't notice that they are divided byspace and time. We are able to separate those water molecules we deemvery close by Relations Division.

There are many thoughts in our mind; however, no two thoughts are soclose that we can't notice that they are divided by space and time. We areable to separate those thoughts we deem very close by Relations Division.

There are many events in our lives; however, no two events are so closethat we can't notice that they are divided by space and time. We are ableto separate those thoughts we deem very close by Relations Division.

Relations Division is the ability to divide apart things that are moreconnected as if they are divided.


20/183


21/183

21

Kinds Space and AwarenessAt any given time, we can perceive only a finite portion of Kinds Space.

Kinds Space extends indefinitely.

Based on our everyday experience, we can come to notice that our perception of the Universe is finite. Additionally, our Kinds Awareness of anygiven spectrum is finite as well.

When we attempt to observe into space, theres a limit to how far our eyescan see, and there's a limit to how small our eyes can see.

When we attempt to lift objects, there's a limit to how much weight we canlight, and there's a limit to how small of objects we can grab.

When we attempt to hear specific sounds, there's a limit to how low of apitch we can hear, and there's a limit to how high of a pitch we can hear.

When we attempt to solve large calculations, theres a limit to how fast wecan calculate, and there's a limit to how slow we can calculate.

The human body is finite, thus, all its functions reach finite levels.

Kinds Integration and Division is no different. Our mind may be able togroup together many things that are different as if they were alike, but there isalways more things on larger portions of the spectrum. Our mind may be able todivide apart many things that alike into differences, but there are always morethings that can be found to have some slight bit of difference. In both of theseareas it extends to infinity; our finite mind can only perceive a finite portion of them.

Scientists have come to notice more than 100 kinds of chemical elementsin the Universe; however, the principle states that there are more elements withvarying properties that we are not aware of.

For example, air is mostly in gas state form and gold in solid state form.Although we classify those two things alike with Kinds Integration, their propertiesare different with Kinds Division. Gases are easily moved throughout space andare less dense; however, gold is heavy and denser.

According to the principle, it states that there are even states of matter that we are not aware of that are more dense and heavier than gold. And it statesthat there are states of matter that we are not aware of that are less dense andheavier than air. And in both of these aspects, if the denser and lighter materialsare discovered, then there will be even more materials to be discovered.

The electromagnetic spectrum organized by physics is one of the easiestways we can see the principle of finite perception of Kinds Space. For example,the electromagnetic spectrum is divided into main kinds of light corresponding totheir wavelengths and frequencies. These are: Radio Waves, which have the


22/183

22

lowest frequency but the longest wavelengths, Infrared Rays, Visible Light,Ultraviolet, X rays and Gamma rays, which have the highest frequency butshortest wavelengths.

However, of all those different kinds of frequencies of light, our minds byKinds Integration can only perceive a finite portion, which we call 'Visible Light'.

We cannot see radio waves, infrared rays, ultraviolet rays, or gamma rays. Wemust use other means of detection to understand them or realize that they exist.Even comparing the electromagnetic spectrum to the biological life

spectrum, we can notice that they are really of no difference. We are aware of fish, plants, insects, land animals, birds, humans, ground animals, and trees.However, as with the electromagnetic spectrum and matter spectrum, the livingspecies spectrum is also similar. We can only perceive a finite portion all possiblekinds of biological life process. The principle states that there is an infinitespectrum to perceive and that we must use other means to detect them outsideof our normal state of awareness.

Kinds Space extends in higher and lower levels, however, at any given

time we can only perceive a finite portion of it.

The Kinds Awareness of any given spectrum of kinds can be increased tolarger portions of the spectrum.

Even though at any given time we can perceive only finite portions of Kinds Space, however, do to instruments and exploration our Kinds Awarenesscan be increase to larger portions of the spectrum on the higher and lower levels.

Our field of view on the kinds of inventions that exist today is currentlylimited and finite. However, by just attempting to do so we can increaseour awareness of the many possible inventions to larger portions of thespectrum.

Our field of view on the kinds of discoveries that exist today is currentlylimited and finite. However, by just attempting to do so we can increaseour awareness of the many possible discoveries to larger portions of thespectrum.

Our field of view on the kinds of religions that exist today is currentlylimited and finite. However, by just attempting to do so we can increaseour awareness of the many possible religions to larger portions of thespectrum.

Our field of view on the kinds of paranormal mysteries that exist today iscurrently limited and finite. However, by just attempting to do so we canincrease our awareness of the many possible paranormal mysteries tolarger portions of the spectrum.


23/183

23

Even thou any given spectrum of kinds will be finite; we can alwaysincrease our awareness to larger portions of the spectrum by attempting to do so.

Relations Space and AwarenessAt any given time, we can perceive only a finite portion of Relations Space.

Relations space extends indefinitely.

The space and time of the Universe appears to be infinite. However, our perceptions are finite. Thus, we can only perceive, at any given time, a finiteportion of the Relations Space with our Relations Awareness .

Our sense of sight is only aware of a finite amount of all that is available tosee. There are an infinite of number of things we haven't yet seen.

Our sense of smell is only aware of a finite amount of all that is availableto smell. There are an infinite number of things we haven't yet smelt.

Our sense of sound is only aware of a finite amount of all that is availableto hear. There are an infinite number of things we haven't yet heard.

Our sense of taste is only aware of a finite amount of all that is available totaste. There are an infinite number of things we haven't yet tasted.

Our knowledge of the Universe is of only a finite amount of all that isavailable. There are an infinite number of things we do not know.

This principle applies to any form of Relations Space. For each RelationsIntegration, it is only a finite portion of all the relations that are available of perceiving, even on the higher and lower levels.

Considering the Relations Integration of a plant, we know that the planthas roots, stems, leaves, and fruit. However, it also has relations in thepast and relations in the future. And if we continue to go down the line inboth directions, well go back to the beginning and end of time.Nonetheless, we can perceive or remember only but so much of time atany given time.

Considering the Relations Divisions of a house, we know that the househas parts. However, its parts are also composed of parts, and those partsare composed of parts. And if we continue to go down farther into theparts, we will notice that at any given time we can perceive only a finiteportion of all the relations that are available.

However, not only do these things apply to the Relations Integration of aplant, or the Relations Division of a house, but to all Relations Integrations and


24/183

24

Divisions we experience. At any given time, we can perceive only a finite portionof Relations Space. Relations space extends indefinitely.

The Relations Awareness of any given form of relations can be increasedto larger portions of the Relations Space.

Even though at any given time we can perceive only finite portions of Relations Space, however, do to instruments and exploration our RelationsAwareness can be increased to larger portions of the spectrum on the higher andlower levels.

Our field of view on the relations of a particular tree may be limited andfinite. However, by just attempting to do so we can increase our awareness of other possible relations of the tree to larger portions of theRelations Space.

Our field of view on the relations of a particular event may be limited andfinite. However, by just attempting to do so we can increase our awareness of the many possible relations of the event to larger portions of the Relations Space.

Our field of view on the relations of the formation of our galaxy may belimited and finite. However, by just attempting to do so we can increaseour awareness of other possible relations of the formation of the galaxy tolarger portions of the Relations Space.

Our field of view on the relations of the formation of life on earth may belimited and finite. However, by just attempting to do so we can increaseour awareness of other possible relations of the formation of life on earthto larger portions of the Relations Space.

Even thou any given form of relations will be finite; we can alwaysincrease our awareness to larger portions of the relations integration byattempting to do so.

Comparative Space and AwarenessAt any given time, we can perceive only a finite portion of comparative

space. Comparative space extends indefinitely.

The logic associated with the finite awareness of the infinite extension of Kinds and Relations Space determines the finite Comparative Awareness of theinfinite extension of Comparative Space. Comparative Space is the combinationof Kinds and Relations Space; therefore, what applies to them coherently appliesto Comparative Space.


25/183

25

There are infinite kinds of numbers, and there are infinite relations of numbers. Each of those numbers belongs to kinds and relations space,and at any given time we can only perceive a finite portion. Therefore, atany given time, we can only perceive a finite portion of the ComparativeSpace of the numbers, which extends indefinitely.

There are infinite kinds of energy, and there are infinite relations of energy. Each of those energies belongs to kinds and relations space, andat any given time we can only perceive a finite portion. Therefore, at anygiven time, we can only perceive a finite portion of the Comparative Spaceof the energies. The comparative space of energy extends indefinitely.There are infinite kinds of movies, and there are infinite relations of movies. Each of those movies belongs to kinds and relations space, andat any given time we can only perceive a finite portion. Therefore, at anygiven time, we can only perceive a finite portion of the comparative spaceof the movies. The comparative space of the movies extends indefinitely.

There are infinite kinds of minds, and there are infinite relations of minds.Each of those minds belongs to kinds and relations space, and at anygiven time we can only perceive a finite portion. Therefore, at any giventime we can only perceive a finite portion of the comparative space of theminds. The comparative space of the consciousness extends indefinitely.

There are infinite kinds of consciousness, and there are infinite relations of consciousness. Each of those minds belongs to kinds and relationsspace, and at any given time we can only perceive a finite portion.Therefore, at any given time we can only perceive a finite portion of thecomparative space of the consciousness. The comparative space of theconsciousness extends indefinitely.

Comparative Space itself is a structure that can only be perceive by finitemeans; just like our finite awareness of space itself. This Comparative Spaceextends indefinitely and at any given time we can perceive only a finite portion of it.

The comparative awareness of any given unit of comparatives can beincreased to larger portions of the comparative unit.

Even though we can only perceive finite portions of comparative space,we can always increase our Comparative Awareness of it by attempting to do so.As our human race explores and continuously tries to gain and find newknowledge of things that are unknown, so we can explore the infinite expansionof comparative space and discover new aspects of its structure.

The Comparative Space of all life on earth may appear to be finite, but byexploring to find more kinds and relations of all life on earth, we can


26/183


27/183

27

biological spectrum is a part, and it goes on to infinity.

Television show belongs to an infinite space of kinds. Television showbelongs to a television show spectrum. However, even the televisionshow spectrum belongs to its own space of kinds. Television show is also

a part of the space of kinds that the television show spectrum is a part,and it goes on to infinity.

Concept belongs to an infinite space of kinds. Concept belongs to aconcept spectrum. However, even the concept spectrum belongs to itsown space of kinds. Concept is also a part of the space of kinds that theconcept spectrum is a part, and it goes on to infinity.

In all the previous understanding expansions, the Kinds Space of each of the ideas extends out to infinity, even looping unto their self, with each thought or idea belonging to an infinite space of kinds.

Everything is composed of kinds.

All things that we can know or understand are composed of kinds. Acolor, for example, belongs to the Kinds Space of the many kinds of thatparticular color. However, each of those colors is composed of many other distinguishable colors. Furthermore, each of those particular colors, arecomposed of even more distinguishable colors. Although, this is pretty much anequivalent explanatory of the infinite space of kinds, however, when we refer tospace, normally we refer to the higher level expansion of it. However, in thissection we will see that everything is also composed of kinds; even those kindsthey are composed of:

Animals are composed of kinds. Various types of animals include:alligators, snakes, elephants, and other kinds of animals. However, evenan alligator is composed of many kinds of alligators. A snake is composedof many kinds of snakes. An elephant is composed of many kinds of elephants.

Spirits are composed of kinds. Various types of spirits include: ghosts,fairies, angels, and other kinds of spirits. However, even a ghost iscomposed of many kinds of ghosts. A fairy is composed of many kinds of fairies. An angel is composed of many kinds of angels.

Particles are composed of kinds. Various types of particles include:protons, neutrons, gluons, and other kinds of particles. However, even aproton is composed of many kinds of protons. A neutron is composed of many kinds of neutrons. A gluon is composed of many kinds of gluons.

Sports are composed of kinds. Various types of sports include:


28/183


29/183

29

belongs to its own space of relations. The spinal chord is also a part of the space of kinds that the nervous system is a part, and it goes on toinfinity.

Television show belongs to an infinite space of kinds. Television show

belongs to a television show spectrum. However, even the televisionshow spectrum belongs to its own space of kinds. Television show is alsoa part of the space of kinds that the television show spectrum is a part,and it goes on to infinity.

Concept belongs to an infinite space of kinds. Concept belongs to aconcept spectrum. However, even the concept spectrum belongs to itsown space of kinds. Concept is also a part of the space of kinds that theconcept spectrum is a part, and it goes on to infinity.

In all the previous understanding expansions, the Relations Space of each

of the ideas extends out to infinity, even looping unto their self, with each thoughtor idea belonging to an infinite space of relations

Everything is composed of relations.

All things that we can know or understand are composed of relations. Apencil, for example, belongs to the Relations Space of the materials thatcomprise it. However, each of those materials is composed of many other materials. Furthermore, each of those is composed of even more materials.Although, this is pretty much an equivalent explanatory of the infinite space of relations, however, when we refer to space, normally we refer to the higher levelexpansion of it. However, in this section we will see that everything is alsocomposed of relations; even those relations they are composed of:

A human is composed of relations. Relations of a human include: heart,lungs, brain, and other relations of a human. However, even the heart iscomposed of relations of the heart. The lung is composed of relations of the lung. The brain is composed of relations of the brain.

A theory is composed of relations. Relations of a theory include:evidence, postulates, experiments, and other relations of the theory.However, even the evidence is composed of relations of the evidence.The postulates are composed of relations of the postulates. Theexperiments are composed of relations of the experiments.

A dream is composed of relations. Relations of a dream include: how,what, why, and other relations of the dream. However, even the 'how' of the dream is composed of relations of the how. The 'what' of the dream iscomposed of relations of the what. The why of the dream is composed of relations of the why.


30/183

30

The Universe is composed of relations. Relations of the Universe include:constellations, galaxies, planetary systems, and other relations of theUniverse. However, even the constellations are composed of relations.The galaxies are composed of relations. The planetary systems are

composed of relations.In all the previous ideas, the inner expansion of the Relations Space

extends out to infinity and looping unto their self with each thought or idea beingcomposed of an infinite space of relations.

Comparative Levels of Composition

Everything has its place within comparative space.

This is the fundamental analogy of the Universe. Everything has its placewithin Comparative Space. All things belong to Kinds Space. All things belongto Relations Space. Therefore, all things belong to Comparative Space, whichcontains Comparative Levels of Composition . As with the relations and kinds,comparative space extends indefinitely; everything belongs to an infinite space of comparatives.

If we create a Comparative Unit , anything can be placed within it.

Eye

We know that there are things that are kind to Eye:

Ear EyeNoseSkin

We know there are things related to the Ear, Eye, Nose, and Skin

Nerves for Sensing Sound Ear Sound Medium of SoundNerves for Sensing Light Eye Light Medium of LightNerves for Sensing Smell Nose Smell Medium of SmellNerves for Sensing Pressure Skin Pressure Medium of Pressure


31/183


32/183

32

as the 'eye' are composed of comparatives; however, some things are so alikethat we limit our distinguishing ability and therefore the descriptions as well.

Kinds Space Nested Patterns

The kinds within the infinite expansion of Kinds Space form nestedpatterns.

Another property of Kinds Space is that the kinds within the infiniteexpansion form nested patterns. Kinds are composed of kinds and are a part of kinds, thus, the elements within the infinite expansion of Kinds Space formnested patterns.

An interesting way to recognize this distinct property is concerning theevery day life of biological species. Certain animals can only mate with certainanimals. There is a specific form of division where the line is crossed on variousparts of the spectrum. Monkeys, for example, can only mate with monkeys.Fish can only mate with fish: birds with birds; humans with humans; and so forth.However, each species belongs to the same biological spectrum, yet, there arespecific divisions where the line is crossed. Like the roots of a tree, each of themare divided forming nested patterns. Other examples include:

There are many kinds of elements. Each of those elements undergoes a'skip'. They are explained on higher levels of the spectrum: solids, liquids,gases, and plasma. Furthermore, they too undergo a skip of that higher level of difference.

There are many kinds of clothing. Each of those clothing undergoes a'skip'. They are explained on higher levels of the spectrum: shoes, jeans,shirt, hat... Furthermore, they too undergo a skip of that higher level of difference.

There are many kinds of light. Each of those light undergoes a 'skip'.They are explained on higher levels of the spectrum: x-rays, gamma rays,ultraviolet, visible Furthermore, they too undergo a skip of that higher level of difference.

Basically, spectrums are composed of spectrums and a part of spectrums.This reveals that there is a sorted nested pattern of divisions of the levels of composition of the kinds within the spectrum.


33/183


34/183

34

galaxies, star systems, planets, rocks, and so forth. Comparative Space issimilar. It is composed of larger units of knowledge, which contains smaller unitsof knowledge, which is composed of smaller units of knowledge, and so on. Thisis the nested patterns of Comparative Space. As with the skipping differencesand divisions of relations and kinds, so the skipping levels of composition of the

comparatives within Comparative Space.

Kinds TransitivityIf two or more things are kind, then they each are kind to each of their

kinds.

Kinds Transitivity involves the interconnectivity of all kinds. It involvesthe oneness of the extension of all things within Kinds Space: If two or morethings are kind, then they each are kind to each of their kinds:

If red is kind to orange and orange is kind to yellow, then red is kind toyellow. Red, orange, and yellow are all colors. Likewise, if another is kindto either of the colors, then the remaining ones are also kind to it

If triangle is kind to square and square is kind to pentagon, then triangle iskind to pentagon. Triangle, square, and pentagon are all shapes.Likewise, if another is kind to either of the shapes, then the remainingones are also kind to it

If love is kind to joy and joy is kind to excitement, then love is kind toexcitement. Love, joy, and excitement are all emotions. Likewise, if another is kind to either of the emotions, then the remaining ones are alsokind to it

If airplane is kind to car and car is kind to boat, then airplane is kind toboat. Airplane, car, and boat are all means of transportation. If another iskind to airplane, car, or boat, then so will it be to the remaining kinds.

If pencil is kind to pen and pen is kind to marker, then pencil is kind tomarker. Pencil, pen, and marker are all writing utensils. If another is kindto pencil, pen, or marker, then so will it be to the remaining kinds.

By going down the list of all possible kinds within any Kinds Integration,we can conclude by Kinds Transitivity that if two or more things are kinds, thenthey each must be kind to each of their kinds.


35/183


36/183

36

Therefore:

Therefore:

Car in Window is related to Relative because it is related to Car Door Shut, and Car Door Shut is related to knock on door, and Knock on Door isrelated to Relative.

Additional Examples:

Winter is related to snow. Snow is related to crystals. Therefore, winter isrelated to crystals.

Boat is related to water. Water is related to fish. Therefore, boat isrelated to fish.

Closed eyes are related to sleep. Sleep is related to dreaming.


37/183

37

Therefore, closed eyes are related to sleep and dreaming.

Bank is related to money. Money is related to buying things. Therefore,bank is related to buying things.

Light is related to 'fasted speed'. Eyes are related to light. Therefore,eyes are related to 'fasted speed'.

Books are related to reading. Reading is related to information.Therefore, books are related to information.

Water evaporation is related to clouds. Clouds are related to rain. Rain isrelated to watering plants. Therefore, water evaporation is related towatering plants.

Einstein is related to relativity. Relativity is related to time travel.

Therefore, Einstein is related to time travel.Past is related to present. Present is related to future. Therefore past isrelated to future.

Foot is related to shoe. Shoe is related to Shoe Factory. Shoe Factory isrelated to Shoe Factory Founder. Therefore, foot is related to ShoeFactory and Shoe Factory Founder.

Wings are related to birds. Birds are related to the sky. The sky is relatedto air. Therefore, wings are related to air.

Pen is related to ink. Ink is related to paper. Paper is related to wood.Therefore, pen is related to wood.

Evolution is related to change. Change is related to time. Therefore,evolution is related to time.

Brain is related to perception. Perception is related to energy. Therefore,brain is related to energy.

With Relations Transitivity, we can notice that if two or more things arerelated, then they each are related to each of their relations.


38/183

38

Comparative Transitivity

If four or more things are comparative, then they each are comparative toeach of their comparatives.

Comparative Transitivity is the property of distant interconnectivity of thecomparatives within Comparative Space. Just as the kinds involves KindsTransitivity, and the relations involves Relations Transitivity so the Comparativesinvolve Comparative Transitivity. Consider the following Comparative Unit:

Eye Light

Ear Sound

Eye is to Light as Ear is to Sound are all Comparatives. In the case of Comparative Transitivity, if one new thing is comparative to either one of them,then remaining comparatives are also comparative to it:

Eye Light

Ear SoundTongue Taste

Since 'Tongue' and 'Taste' are added to the Comparative Unit, then if 'Eye'is to 'Light' as 'Ear' is to 'Sound', and 'Ear' is to 'Sound' as 'Tongue' is to 'Taste',then 'Eye' is to 'Light' as 'Tongue' is to 'Taste'.

If more is added to the Comparative Unit, then addition can be deducedconcerning Comparative Transitivity:

Eye Light Colors

Ear Sound NotesTongue Taste Flavors

The Comparative Transitivity of this particular Comparative Unit can bededuced in many ways. One particular way is to notice that any four wordswithin the Comparative Space that share the same Relations and Kinds of space,one of each, then they are comparatives. This is because if the original four arecomparatives and two kinds are added as comparatives to light and sound(Colors and Notes), then eye and ear are also comparatives two Colors andNotes. Furthermore, since Ear and Notes are comparatives to Tongue andFlavors, then so likewise is Eye and Colors.

Comparative Transitivity, as with Kinds and Relations Transitivity, involvethe distant interconnectivity of all things comparative. If four or more things are


39/183

39

comparatives, then they must also be comparative to each of their comparatives.

Kinds Relationship Measurement The more alike are two or more kinds, the greater their kinds relationship

measurement.

Kinds Relations Measurement is an element of Kinds Division andIntegration. All things may be different and alike, but some things are more alikeand different than others. Some things may be more distinct from each other then two other things are from each other. Similarly, two things may be morealike to each other than two other things are to each other. This ability of KindsSpace is noticing the Kinds Relationship Measurement, which has a greater quantity the more alike are two or more things.

Examples include:

Two people may be more alike than two other people. Therefore, thosepeople who are more alike have a greater Kinds RelationshipMeasurement. However, those people who are less alike have a lower Kind Relationship Measurement.

Two hats may be more alike than two other hats. Therefore, those hatsthat are more alike have a greater Kinds Relationship Measurement.However, those hats that are less alike have a lower Kind RelationshipMeasurement.

Two birds may be more alike than two other birds. Therefore, those birdsthat are more alike have a greater Kinds Relationship Measurement.However, those birds that are less alike have a lower Kind RelationshipMeasurement.

Two thoughts may be more alike than two other thoughts. Therefore,those thoughts that are more alike have a greater Kinds RelationshipMeasurement. However, those thoughts that are less alike have a lower Kind Relationship Measurement.

Relations Relationship Measurement The more related are two or more relations, the greater their relations

relationship measurement.

Relations Relationship Measurement concerns the amount of


40/183

40

relatedness of two or more things. When a given number of relations are morerelated, or more likely to work together, then those relations have a greater Relations Relationship Measurement. Likewise, when a given number of relations are less related, or less likely to work together, then the relations areless related and have a lower Relations Relationship Measurement.

Two relations such as a duck and a pond they swim in have a greater Relations Relationship Measurement than a duck and a desert. Ducks aremore likely to work together with ponds, however, a desert is hardlyrelated to them; therefore, the Relations Relationship Measurement issmaller.

Two relations such as a boat and fishermen have a greater RelationsRelationship Measurement than a boat and astronaut. A boat andfisherman are more likely to work together. However, an astronaut is lesslikely to work together and has a smaller Relations Relationship

Measurement.Two relations such as a water and ice have a greater RelationsRelationship Measurement than water and coal. Water and ice are ideasmore associated together. However, coal is less related to them and has alower Relations Relationship Measurement.

Two relations such as tree and leaves have a greater RelationsRelationship Measurement than a tree and a cloud. Tree and leaves areideas more associated together. However, a cloud is less related to themand has a lower Relations Relationship Measurement.

Comparative Relationship Measurement The more alike and related are four or more comparatives, the greater their

comparative relationship measurement.

The comparatives within Comparative Space that are closer together aremore alike and related. Thus, they have a greater Comparative RelationshipMeasurement than comparatives that are farther away. In the followingexample, comparatives with a greater Comparative Relationship Measurementare closer together and those with lesser are farther apart:

Teeth Toothbrush ToothpasteHair Hands ShampooSkin Rag Soap

In the previous Comparative Unit, Teeth, Toothpaste, Skin and Soap,


41/183

41

have the lowest Comparative Relationship Measurement. This is because theyare farthest apart.

However, hair, hands, skin, and rag, as well as all other comparatives withthe same distance, have a greater Comparative Relationship measurement. If more were added to the Comparative Unit, then those that are farthest apart

would decrease in Comparative Relationship Measurement.

Kinds Order Spectrums of kinds must maintain a specific order for understanding,

where those that are most alike are closest together and those least alikefarthest apart.

Before being able to truly understand a Kinds Integration, there needs tobe some degree of Kinds Order . The order of kinds within Kinds Space iswhere those that are most alike are closest together and those least alike farthestapart. For example:

The numbers 1 through 10 are all distinct. However, not all are equally asdistinct to each and every one. When grouping them together into kinds without ordering them as most alike closest together, we get:

92367184510

As is apparent, there's not much meaning when there's low Kinds Order:

1 is more alike to 2 than 1 is to 7 or 8. Yet, we have those two numberscloser together to 1 than 2.

8 is more alike to 7 and 9 than 1 and 4. Yet, we have those numbers (1

and 4) closer to 8 than 7 and 9. The difference between 9 and 4 is 5. Thedifference between 4 and 7 is 3. Therefore, 4 and 7 should be closer than9 and 4.

10 is more alike to 9 than it is to 5. Yet, we have 5 closer to 10 than 9.Their quantities are of different magnitudes, but there are also those withclosest magnitudes than the others.


42/183


43/183

43

Green and purple have a closer frequency and wavelength to blue thanblue has to all the remaining colors.

Least alike closer together:

LiquidPlasmaGasSolid

Least alike farthest apart:

GasLiquidSolidPlasma

Gases are more alike to liquids, than they are to solids and Plasma.

Liquids are more alike to gas and solids than they are to plasma.

Solids are more alike to liquid and plasma than they are to gases.

Plasma is more alike to solids, than it is to liquid and gases.

In the previous examples, it is apparent that there needs to be somedegree of Kinds Order for understanding. And this is done by arranging thosethat are most alike as closest together and those least alike as farthest apart.

Relations Order Forms of relations must maintain a specific order for understanding, where

those that are most related are closest together and those least relatedfarthest apart.

In order to understand a Relations Integration there needs to be somedegree Relations Order . Consider the following sentence: The Cow ate itsfood. Each of those words is related to each other but only because of the waythey are arranged in relationship to each other.

If we rearranged the words into food The Cow its Ate, understandingthem as relations, or working together becomes hideous. Theres not a very agood possibility we are able to understand the integration. In the case of the firstsentence, those that were most related were closest together, and those least


44/183

44

related farthest apart. In the case of the second, those that were most relatedwere apart.

Now lets take the entire previous paragraph and determine the order of relations:

The following group of relations in the previous paragraph starting with If

we rearranged is structured where those most related are closest together,and those least related farthest apart. Here it is again:

If we rearranged, the words into food The Cow its Ate, understanding them as relations, or working together becomes hideous. Theres not a very agood possibility we are able to understand the integration. In the case of the first sentence, those that were most related were closest together, and those least related farthest apart. In the case of the second, those that were most related were apart.

Now if we arrange them were those that are least related closer together

and those most related farther apart, we get:apart. If were we related rearranged, most the were words that into those

"food second, The the Cow of its case Ate," the understanding In them apart. Asfarthest relations, related or least working those together and becomes together hideous. closest There's were not related a most very were a that good those

possibility sentence, we first are the able of to case understand the the Inintegration.

In the later paragraph, it is not very easy to understand the given form of relations. The given form has all the parts of the first paragraph, but it is not withrelations order. It is not arranged where those that are most related are closesttogether, and those least related farthest apart. It is rather the opposite. So weneed Relations Order for understanding a given form of relations.

Things in our everyday life also need Relations Order for understanding.Cars, for example, if they had wheels on top rather than on the bottom, and thecar seat facing the ground, and everything else randomly arranged, it would bevery difficult to understand the form it would be more difficult to see the givenform of relations.

If a humans parts werent ordered as they normally are, wed think it werea different creature, and in fact not even understand what it is.

If the rooms of a house had the compositions of each other room, such asdishes in the bathroom, television in the closet, stairs going outside; refrigerator on the roof, and so forth, it wouldn't be very easy to understand them asrelations. Thus, in order to do so, we need a given amount of Relations Order for the understanding of relations.


45/183


46/183

46

Independence Day Halloween DayNew Years Date Thanks Giving DateEaster Day Christmas DateIndependence Date New Years DayEaster Date Halloween DateChristmas Day Thanks Give Day

With the previous examples, there needs to be some degree of comparative order for understanding. This is emphasized by those that are mostalike and related are closer together, and that the relations and kinds are orderedperpendicularly.

Kinds Quantity Within any given spectrum of kinds, there exists a specific Kinds Quantity.

Kinds Quantity is the number of kinds we perceive within a given KindsIntegration. Being aware of a specific spectrum, the number of distinct kinds canbe counted. That number will be equal to the Kinds Quantity.

Examples include:

There are many kinds of stars in the Universe. We can count those manykinds of stars to be a specific number. That specific number of distinct

stars is equal to the Kinds Quantity.

There are many kinds of life on earth. We can count those many kinds of life to be a specific number. That specific number of distinct life is equal toKinds Quantity.

There are many kinds of numbers. We can count those many kinds of numbers to be a specific number. That specific number of distinctnumbers is equal to the Kinds Quantity.

There are many kinds of books. We can count those many kinds of books

to be a specific number. That specific number of distinct books is equal tothe Kinds Quantity.

There are many kinds of past events. We can count those many kinds of past events to be a specific number. That specific number of distinct pastevents is equal to the Kinds Quantity.


47/183

47

Relations Quantity Within any given form of relations, there exists a specific relations quantity.

Relations Quantity is the number of relations we perceive within a givenRelations Integration. Being aware of a specific system, the number of relationscan be counted. That number will be equal to the Relations Quantity.

Examples include:

A cup is composed of many parts of energy. The cup as a whole is agroup of relations that work together. We can attempt to count, or estimate, the number of parts that the cup is composed of.

A tree is composed of many parts of energy. The tree as a whole is agroup of relations that work together. We can attempt to count, or estimate, the number of parts that the tree is composed of.

The earth is composed of many parts of energy. The earth as a whole is agroup of relations that work together. We can attempt to count, or estimate, the number of parts that the earth is composed of.

A frequency of light is composed of many parts. Within a given period of time, the number of waves that pass a given point can be counted. Thenumber will be equal to the Relations Quantity.

Space itself is an extension. It is composed of units within space. Thus,those units that comprise it can be counted, or estimated. The number willbe equal to Relations Quantity

An entire story is composed of many words. All those words worktogether to create the story. We can attempt to count, or estimate, thenumber of words of the given story.

Comparative Quantity

Within any given unit of comparatives, there exists a specific comparativequantity.

Comparative Space is composed of comparatives. The number of comparatives within a given portion of Comparative Space is equal to theComparative Quantity . Since comparatives are the equivalents of kinds andrelations, comparative quantity is the sum of the relations ad kinds quantity of agiven Comparative Unit:


48/183

48

Here are some examples from the previous comparative units:

Blood Vessels HeartAir Wind Pipes Lungs

Food Esophagus IntestinesElectrons Nerves Brain

This Comparative Unit contains twelve comparatives. Each spectrum iscontains of four kinds, or Kinds Quantity. Each Relations Integration containsthree relations, or Relations Quantity. Relations Quantity x Kinds Quantity isEqual to Comparative Quantity.

Christmas Day Christmas Date

New Years Day New Years DateEaster Day Easter DateIndependence Day Independence DateHalloween Day Halloween Date

This Comparative Unit has a Comparative Quantity of ten. Its KindsQuantity in each spectrum is five. Its Relations Quantity in each row is two.Thus, its Comparative Quantity is equal to its Relations Quantity x its KindsQuantity.

Kinds Density The greater the number of kinds within a given portion of kinds space, the

greater the kinds density.

Kinds Density refers to the number of kinds within any fixed portion of Kinds Space. As matter density exists in the physical world, so Kinds Densityexists in the comparative world. As the greater the number of particles within agiven portion of space, the greater the matter density, so the greater the number

of kinds per kinds space, the greater the Kinds Density. Examples include:

The Kind Integration of the many kinds of shapes is known to particular people. However, one person may know of more different kinds of shapesper Kinds Awareness than another. In this case, the person has a muchgreater Kinds Density of the idea 'shapes'.

The Kinds Integration of the many kinds of languages is known to


49/183

49

particular people. However, one person may know of more different kindsof languages per Kinds Awareness than another. In this case, the personhas a much greater Kinds Density of the idea 'languages'.

The Kinds Integration of the many kinds of experiences is known to

particular people. However, one person may know of more different kindsof experiences per Kinds Awareness than another. In this case, theperson has a much greater Kinds Density of the idea 'experiences'.

Relations Density The greater the number of relations within a given portion of relations

space, the greater the relations density.

Relations Density refers to the number of relations within any fixedportion of Relations Space. As Kinds Density exists within Kinds Space, so withRelations Density exists within Relations Space. The greater the number of relations per unit of Relations Awareness, the greater the Relations Density.

This kind of density is the normal density we see in our every day life.Physicists explain density as mass per unit volume. With this principle, includinga greater number of things, relations are the mass, and Relations Space is thevolume. The greater the number of relations per Relations Space, the greater the Relations Density.

This applies not only to matter and space, but to all forms of RelationsIntegration. Time, for example, is no different than space. It is an extensioncomposed of events. A wave occurs within time and various waves have variousfrequencies. That frequency is the number of times a given part of the wavepasses a given point within a finite number of time. The greater the frequency of the wave, the greater the density it has within time. Frequency is velocity dividedby wavelength. Just as Density is Mass Per Unit Volume, so Frequency isVelocity Divided by Wavelength.

From those two equations, we can unite them with a common description.The relationship between Relations Awareness, Relations, and relations densityis as follows: Relations Density = Relations/Relations Awareness. This includesthe density of matter within space, the density of occurrences within time, andany other form of Relations Integration.

Comparative Density The greater the number of comparatives within any given portions of

comparative space, the greater the comparative density.

Comparative Density refers to the number of comparatives within any fixedportion of Comparative Space. As Kinds and Relations Density exists within


50/183

50

Kinds and Relations Space, so Comparative Density exists within ComparativeSpace. The greater the number of comparatives per unit of ComparativeAwareness, the greater the Comparative Density. The following ComparativeUnit contains one with greater and less density:

Comparative Unit with less density:

Book Writer Song Singer

Comparative Unit with more density:

Book Writer Book Publisher Song Singer Song Producer

In the latter Comparative Unit, it contains more detail of ideas within the

four cell space than the first comparative unit. Therefore, we can say that it hasa greater Comparative Density.

Kinds Common Description Those things we group together as if they were alike, we give common

descriptions. When we integrate distinct things by Kinds Integration, we give them a

Kinds Common Description . This mentally programs our mind to mentallyintegrate the given number of distinct things. Here are a few examples:

There are many distinct bodies that revolve around the sun. However, wecan group them all and give them a Kinds Common Description bydenoting them all as 'planets'.

There are many distinct things that are built for people to live in. However,we can group them all and give them a Kinds Common Description bydenoting them all as 'a home'.

There are many distinct things in the Universe in which we are able toknow and understand. However, we can group them all together and givethem a Kinds Common Description by denoting them all as 'everything'.

Addition examples include:

Kinds Common Description 1 :


51/183

51

In the previous example, even though all those forms are distinct, byseparating them from all other distinct things in the Universe, we can group onlythem together as one and give them all a Kinds Common Description in which weinfer by the name 'fruit'.


In the previous example, even though all those forms are distinct, byseparating them from all other distinct things in the Universe, we can group themtogether as one and give them all a Kinds Common Description in which we infer by the name 'shapes'.



52/183

52

In the previous example, even though all those forms are distinct, byseparating them from all other distinct things in the Universe, we can group themtogether as one and give them all a Kinds Common Description, in which we infer by the name 'colors'.

Within a Comparative Unit, the Kinds Common Description comes after the

Kinds Uncommon Descriptions; the Kinds Uncommon Descriptions comebefore the Kinds Common Description.

When we attempt to describe Kinds Common Descriptions the KindsUncommon Descriptions come before the common description.

For example, the human hand is composed of five fingers. Each of thosefingers is different but we apply them a Kinds Common Description. The kind of finger we are referring to has a description that comes before the kinds commondescription 'finger':

Correct:

Pinky Finger Ring Finger Middle Finger Index Finger Thumb Finger

Incorrect:

Finger PinkyFinger Ring

Finger MiddleFinger IndexFinger Thumb

The Kinds Uncommon Descriptions are: Pinky, Ring, Middle, Index, andThumb. The Kinds Common Description is Finger. As we can see the KindsUncommon Descriptions Proceed the Kinds Common Description, this is whenwe are applying them within a comparative unit.


53/183

53

Applying common kinds descriptions to uncommon kind descriptions anduncommon kinds descriptions to common kinds descriptions increases

our kinds integration and division of the kinds.

As previously noted, our mind has the ability to group together things thatare alike and give them a common description. It also has the ability to divideapart things that are different and give them an uncommon description. However,what would happen if we were to do them at the same time? What would happenif we group and divide a group of different things at the same time? We will giveKinds Common Descriptions uncommon descriptions and Kinds UncommonDescriptions Common Descriptions:

Kinds of Colors:

Red

OrangeYellowGreenBluePurple

Thus:

Red Color Orange Color Yellow Color Green Color Blue Color Purple Color

In the previous example, the kinds are divided by giving them KindsUncommon Descriptions (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple) and at thesame time grouped by giving them a Kinds Common Description (color). TheUncommon Kinds Descriptions are located to the left, and the Kinds CommonDescription preceding each of the Kinds Uncommon Descriptions. By doing so, itprograms our mind to group together and divides apart distinct things.

Kinds of Animals:

LandAir Water Ground


54/183

54

Thus:

Land AnimalsAir AnimalsWater Animals

Ground AnimalsIn the previous example, the kinds are divided by giving them Kinds

Uncommon Descriptions (land, air, water, and ground) and at the same timegrouped by giving them a Kinds Common Description (animals). The UncommonKinds Descriptions are located to the left, and the Kinds Common Descriptionpreceding each of the Kinds Uncommon Descriptions. By doing so, it programsour mind to group together and divides apart the distinct things.

Kinds of Matter:

SolidLiquidGasPlasma

Thus:

Solid Matter Liquid Matter Gas Matter Plasma Matter

In the previous example, the kinds are divided by giving them KindsUncommon Descriptions (solid, liquid, gas, and plasma) and at the same timegrouped by giving them a Kinds Common Description (matter). The UncommonKinds Descriptions are located to the left, and the Kinds Common Descriptionpreceding each of the Kinds Uncommon Descriptions. By doing so, it programsour mind to group together and divides apart the distinct things.

Kinds of Transportation:

Water GroundLandAir Space

Thus:

Water Transportation


55/183


56/183

56

Hope EmotionDetermination EmotionExcitement Emotion

In the previous example, the kinds are divided by giving them Kinds

Uncommon Descriptions (joy, love, hope, determination, and excitement) and atthe same time grouped by giving them a Kinds Common Description (emotion).The Uncommon Kinds Descriptions are located to the left, and the KindsCommon Description preceding each of the Kinds Uncommon Descriptions. Bydoing so, it programs our mind to group together and divide apart the distinctthings.

Kinds of DimensionsLengthWidth

HeightTime

Thus:

Length DimensionWidth DimensionHeight DimensionTime Dimension

In the previous example, the kinds are divided by giving them KindsUncommon Descriptions (Length, width, height, and time) and at the same timegrouped by giving them a Kinds Common Description (dimensions). TheUncommon Kinds Descriptions are located to the left, and the Kinds CommonDescription preceding each of the Kinds Uncommon Descriptions. By doing so, itprograms our mind to group together and divides apart the distinct things.

Every corresponding description applies to more than one thing weconsider as alike.

One Word Descriptions

When considering anything we know and its corresponding name or description, that thing or idea is always more than one.

The word 'in', for example, can apply to a variety of situations:

Perhaps you are looking in your closet for something to wear.Someone asks, What are you doing?"


57/183

57

You reply with: "I am looking IN the closet."

Perhaps you are swimming in your swimming pool.Someone asks, "What are you doing?"

You reply with, "I am swimming IN the pool."

Perhaps you are about to get into your car to go to work.Someone asks, "What are you doing?"

You reply with, "I am getting IN to the car."

Perhaps you are pouring water into a cup.Someone asks, "What are you going?"

You reply with, "I am pouring water IN to the cup"In each of the previous examples, we described the concept of 'in';

however, no 'in' was exactly alike. The description 'in' is a one word description,however, in our mind it applies to more than one thing we consider as alike.What we've done is just given them, the distinct things, a Kinds CommonDescription. Nevertheless, they apply to more than one thing we consider asalike.

There are various other kinds of in such as:

'In' a refrigerator 'In' a boat'In' a food store'In' the mind'In' the house'In' the world'In' the book

The word is one thing, but it is describing more than one thing we consider as alike.

Another important thing to acknowledge is that no 'in' is alike. For example, you can be swimming in a lake, and another person in a different lake.Thus, you can say you are swimming in the lake, and you can say he isswimming in the lake. However, once again, those are slightly different ideasth

Informational Comparative Science

Documents