Information and Dialogue In the Context of Significant Long-term Reductions in State Funding – Part VIII Horace Mitchell, PhD President President CSUB.

Information and Dialogue

In the Context of Significant Long-term Reductions in State Funding – Part VIII

Horace Mitchell, PhD President

CSUB Budget Forum – FY 2012-13 May 22, 2012

1

Agenda

I. 10-year funding trends for CSUB

II. 2011-12 State Funding Reductions: CSU

III. CSU Planning/Response to Budget 2011-12 Reductions

IV. Impacts on CSUB: 2011-12

V. Planning for 2012-13 Budget: CSU

VI. Planning for 2012-13 Budget: CSUB

VII. Planning for 2013-14

VIII. Q & A / Discussion

Welcome

2

I. 10-year funding trends for CSUB

• changes in state funding• increase in tuition fee income• total state funding and tuition fee income

3

4

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

-

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

70,000,000

CSU Bakersfield10-Year Historic State Funding

State Support

5

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

-

5,000,000

10,000,000

15,000,000

20,000,000

25,000,000

30,000,000

35,000,000

40,000,000

45,000,000

CSU Bakersfield10-Year Historic Tuition

Student Tuition

6

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

-

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

70,000,000

CSU Bakersfield10-Year Historic General Funding

Student Tuition State Support

II. 2011-12 State Funding Reductions: CSU

• March, 2011: Legislature adopts State budget$500M

• July, 2011: approval of final State budget 150M

• December 2011: “trigger” reduction+100M

Total $750M

7

III. CSU Planning/Response to 2011-12 Budget Reductions

8

• November, 2010: Board of Trustees approve 10% tuition fee increase for 2011-12

• July, 2011: Board of Trustees approve additional 12% tuition fee increase for 2011-12

IV. Impacts on CSUB: 2011-12

9

Reduction Reduction Reduction

State Reduction for CSU $ (500,000,000) $(150,000,000) $ (100,000,000)

CSUB Net Reduction / increase $ (4,106,483) $ 413,196 $ (2,065,800)

Reductions to Campus Divisions (Approximate)

President's Office $ (25,000)

University Advancement (55,000)

Academic Affairs (2,100,000)

Business and Administrative Services (600,000)

Student Affairs (130,000)

Athletics (145,000)

Central Benefits (1,052,000)

-

413,196 (2,065,800) (1) Total Reduction / increase $ (4,107,000) $ 413,196 $ (2,065,800)

(1)Prior unallocated funds used to cover budget reduction

V. Planning for 2012-13 Budget: CSU

10

• November, 2011: Board of Trustees approve 9.1% tuition fee increase for 2012-13

• Governor’s January 2012 budget proposal: no increase / decrease from 2011-12 allocation

• Governor’s “trigger” cuts (if tax initiative not approved by voters in November, 2012)– Jan. 2012 budget proposal $200M– May 2012 revision + 50M

Total $250M• May 2012: Board of Trustees discuss Cost Reduction

and Revenue Enhancement Strategies

Note: The additional $50M trigger cut was announced by the governor after the May 2012 board meeting.

11

12

1313

• Impact of $200M “trigger” cut $4.2M• Impact of additional $50M cut 1.1M

Total $5.3M

• Most actions will be deferred until after the November, 2012 tax initiative results are known

• The magnitude of the cumulative reductions require that we examine in a fundamental way the campus’ core academic mission and core student and campus services

VI. Planning for 2012-13 Budget: CSUB

14

• The Academic Senate Budget Prioritization Task Force has provided a set of guiding principles and recommendations that will be given careful consideration.

• The next meeting of the University Strategic Planning and Budget Advisory Committee will be held on June 8, 2012.

• Additional updates and discussions will occur with deans, department chairs, faculty and staff; the Academic Senate; ASi officers and students; and the President’s Cabinet.

• Another Campus Budget Forum will be scheduled early in the fall quarter.

15

VII. Planning for 2013-14

• Permanent reductions not made in 2012-13 must be implemented in 2013-14

16

VIII. Q & A / Discussion