Influence of a Magnetic Field on the Electrodeposition of Nickel-Iron Alloys Adriana Ispas , Andreas Bund SFB 609
Jan 18, 2016
Influence of a Magnetic Field on the Electrodeposition of
Nickel-Iron Alloys
Adriana Ispas, Andreas Bund
SFB 609
2
Outline
Introduction Experimental details Results and discussions
Iron content vs. current density Iron content vs. magnetic field Hydrogen evolution Morphology aspects
3
Alloy Deposition: is the simultaneous deposition of more than one metal
Advantages: Most of the alloys can be deposited without much difficulties Most of the alloys have useful properties: finer grains, harder, stronger, more
corrosion resistant than the parent metals, high magnetic permeability
→ Because of that, in some applications the alloys replace the single metal
Disadvantage: Alloys deposition request close control of the electrolytic bath
Ni-Fe alloys present a high internal strength, hardness and special magnetic properties
Brenner: „Anomalous codeposition“ is characterized by the anomaly that the less noble metal deposits preferentially
Abner Brenner, Electrodeposition of Alloys. Principle and Practice, Vol.1 (1963), Academic Press New York and London, p.77
“Modern Electroplating”, fourth edition, edited by M. Schlesinger and M. Paunovic, John Wiley & Sons, INC., 2000, p. 468
4
Magnetic field influences
the properties of the deposited layers the transport of electroactive species
(MHD effect)
C2μ
BχF
0
2m
p
BvEqF
Force acting on the moving ions in the solution (Lorentz force):q= electric chargeE=electric fieldv= velocityB= magnetic field
0
m
μ
BBχCF
Paramagnetic force: Force due to B Gradient
m -the molar susceptibility
C –concentration -the vacuum permeability
5
Magnetic field effects
From: J. M. D. Coey, G. Hinds, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 326(2001), 238-245.
• induces an additional convection in the electrolyte that decreases the thickness of the diffusion layer → increasing of the limiting current • increases the mass transport
Disk electrode
ΔV
B
I
F
6
Experimental details
QN C S
RE CE
WENA
L
Experimental set-up
N, S → poles of the electromagnetC → electrochemical cellQ → quartzWE → working electrode (Au)CE → counter electrode (Pt)RE → reference electrode (Ag/AgCl/KCl) NA → Network Analyzer
B
E
Orientation 1
B
E
Orientation 2
Composition of the bath: 0.5 M NiSO4*6H2O; 0.01 M FeSO4*7H2O; 0.4 M H3BO3 ; pH=2-3
0.5 M NiSO4*6H2O; 0.07 M FeSO4*7H20; 0.4 M H3BO3; pH=2
7
Quartz Crystal Microbalance
1/2 qq
20
ρμA
Δm2fΔf
quartz
gold electrodes
film
shear motion
Sauerbrey equation:
9,997 9,998 9,999 10,000
0
20
40
60
80
100
Quartz withRigid Layer
UnloadedQuartz
Quartz withDamping Layer
w0
wLayer 1
wLayer 2
fR,Layer 2
fR,Layer 1 fR,0
Rea
l Par
tof
Adm
ittan
ce /
mS
f / MHZ
2* w
iΔff
Mass Damping
Complex frequency shift
(μq = shear modulus [g/cm s2]; ρq = density of the quartz [g/cm3]; A =piezoelectrically active area)
8
Phase Diagram
From: Scientific Group Thermodata Europe Binary Phase Diagram Collection
9
Saturation flux density values
From: E.I. Cooper et al. , IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 49 (2005), no. 1, 103-126.
10
Iron content in Weight percent
-60 -50 -40 -30 -20
2
3
4
5
Fe
in
dep
osi
ted
allo
y/ W
t%
itotal
/ mA cm-2
B = 0 mT
Fe in the bath- 0.05 Wt%
1-st Electrolyte
Composition of the bath: 0.5 M NiSO4*6H2O; 0.01 M FeSO4*7H2O; 0.4 M H3BO3 ; pH=2-3
11
Influence of the B field on iron content
0 150 300 450 6000
1
2
3
4
Fe
co
nte
nt
/ W
t%
B / mT
itotal
= -35 mA cm-2
itotal
= -45 mA cm-2
itotal
= -50 mA cm-2
B E
B || E B E
0 100 200 300 400 500
2
3
4
5
Fe
cont
ent
/ W
t%
B / mT
itotal
= -35 mA cm-2
itotal
= -45 mA cm-2
itotal
= -50 mA cm-2
B E
12
The damping change of the quartz
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
-800
-400
0
400
800
1200D
ampi
ng c
hang
e,
w /
Hz
time / s
B= 0 mT B = 740 mT, perpendicular
itotal
= -25 mA cm-2
13
Morphology aspects
i= -25mA cm-2; B=0mT; pH=3 i= -25mA cm-2; B=740mT, ; pH=3
14
i= -50mA cm-2; B=0 mT; pH=2 i= -50mA cm-2; B=445mT, ||; pH=2
i= -50mA cm-2; B=740mT, ; pH=2
15
B = 0 mT
B = 445 mT, B||E B = 530 mT, BE
Itotal= -35 mA cm-2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
1,00
1,25
1,50
1,75
itotal
= -35 mA cm-2
Rq(
B)/
Rq(
B=
0mT
)
B / mT
B perpendicular E B parallel E
N
ZZR
2avei
q
• Rq is the standard deviation of the Z values within the given area,
calculated from the topography image (the height),
• Zi is the current Z value,
• Zave- the average of Z values within the given area
• N- number of points from the given area.
16
Iron content in Weight percent2-nd Electrolyte
-120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0
14
21
28
35
42
49F
e co
nten
t /
Wt %
i / mA cm-2
B=0 mT
Fe in bath- 0.4 Wt %
Composition of the bath:0.5 M NiSO4*6H2O; 0.07 M FeSO4*7H20; 0.4 M H3BO3; pH=2
17
Influence of the B field on iron content
0 150 300 450 600 7500
6
12
18
24
30
36
Fe
co
nte
nt
/ W
t%
B / mT
(B, E) perpendicular (B,E) paralleli
total= -50 mA cm-2
0 150 300 450 600 7500
6
12
18
24
Fe
co
nte
nt
/ W
t%
B / mT
(B,E) perpendicular (B,E) paralleli
total= -70 mA cm-2
18
Partial current of Hydrogen evolution
0 150 300 450 600 750
14
16
18
20
22itotal
= -70 mA cm-2
i H2
/ m
A c
m-2
B / mT
B E B E
0 150 300 450 600 7506
8
10
12
14
16
18
i H2 /
mA
cm
-2
B / mT
B E B E
itotal
= -50 mA cm-2
19
Roughness of the deposit
0 150 300 450 600 750
0,70
0,75
0,80
0,85
0,90
0,95
1,00
Rq(
B)/
Rq(
B=
0mT
)
B / mT
B E B E
i= -70 mA cm-2
0 150 300 450 600 7500,8
0,9
1,0
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
1,5
1,6
i= -50 mA cm-2
Rq
(B
)/R
q(B
=0
)B / mT
B E B E
20
Morphology aspects
1.3µm 1.3µm 1.3µm
Itotal= -50 mA cm-2
B=0 mT B=406 mT, B||EB=528 mT, BE
21
Conclusions
Fe content is changing with the B field in an opposite way for the two electrolytes investigated
Fe content of the permalloy increases for (B E) and is almost constant for (B || E)
Roughness and hydrogen evolution are not influenced in the case that B is parallel to E
Specific morphology is generated in the presence of a B field
Thank you!