US$ 2.50 US$ 5.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 POVERTY HEADCOUNT RATIO, 2000-2012 Source: ECATSD using ECAPOV. TRENDS DEMOGRAPHICS BELARUS LIVING ABOVE US$ 5.00 LIVING BETWEEN US$ 2.50- 5.00 INEQUALITY INDICES, 2000-2012 Source: ECATSD using ECAPOV. GINI THEIL GROWTH DISTRIBUTION CONTRIBUTORS Value Global Global Conditional ECA ECA Conditional Years Poverty change (US$ 2.50)* 1 -0.04% 27 33 34 98 2007- 2012 Income/ consumption growth of the bottom 40%** 1 9.13% 95 99 83 95 2006- 2011 UNDP Human Development Index 2 0.793 50/186 - 10/29 - 2012 *Annualized. Benchmarking numbers present percentile performance among indicated distribution group. “Conditional” refers to performance when controlling for poverty in the initial period, GDP per capita, fragility index, landlocked country, country growth rate, global growth rate, and frequency of poverty data. **Annualized. Benchmarking numbers present percentile performance among indicated distribution group. “Conditional” refers to percentile performance when controlling for type of welfare measure, GNI per capita 2012,Gini in first period, poverty head count in first period, and country growth rate. PERFORMANCE LIVING BELOW US$ 2.50 Women Men CONSUMER PRICE INDEX, 2000-2013 Source: National Statistical Committee of Belarus. Note: 2010 =100. GENERAL FOOD SURVEY DATA INCOME/CONSUMPTION GROWTH PER CAPITA BY QUINTILE, 2006-2011 Source: ECATSD using ECAPOV. SHARE (FINAL) GROWTH EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA POVERTY & SHARED PROSPERITY AT A GLANCE GDP per capita, PPP (current international $) 1 15,327 (2012) GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$) 1 6,530 (2012) Rural population (% of total population) 1 25 (2012) National strategy for statistical development POVERTY Population living below national line (%) 1 5.50 (2013) Population living below US$ 1.25 (%) 2 0.00 (2012) Population living below US$ 2.5 (%) 2 0.01 (2012) Population living below US$ 5.00 (%) 2 0.52 (2012) Population living above US$ 10.00 (%) 2 86.67 (2012) Population living in multidimensional poverty (%) 3 0.00 (2005) INEQUALITY Gini index 2 0.26 (2012) Theil index 2 0.12 (2012) SHARED PROSPERITY Welfare definition Period of analysis Income/consumption growth of bottom 40 2 Income/consumption growth total population 2 Income/consumption growth of top 60 2 GDP growth 1 Growth of private consumption 1 2012-2015 Consumption 2006-2011 9.13% 8.14% 6.69% 5.71% 7.84% Sources: 1 WDI. 2 ECATSD using ECAPOV. 3 UNDP. Sources: 1 ECATSD using ECAPOV. Azevedo and Nguyen (2014). 2 UNDP (2013). POPULATION BY AGE AND POVERTY STATUS, 2010 (MILLIONS) Source: ECATSD using ECAPOV. 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 0-14 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-older 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 1 (poorest) 2 3 4 5 (richest) Share Growth 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 % CONTRIBUTION TO POVERTY REDUCTION, (US$ 2.50), 2006-2011 Source: ECATSD using ECAPOV. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 September/2014 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
2
Embed
INEQUALITY September/2014 US$ 5.00 POVERTY & 2 Public ...documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/794871468031523892/pdf/914… · LIVING ABOVE US$ 5.00 LIVING BETWEEN US$ 2.50-5.00 INEQUALITY
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
% CONTRIBUTION TO POVERTY REDUCTION, (US$ 2.50), 2006-2011
Source: ECATSD using ECAPOV.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
September/2014P
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
edP
ublic
Dis
clos
ure
Aut
horiz
ed
WB456286
Typewritten Text
91470
Official poverty estimates in Belarus are produced by National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus based on a quar-
terly household sample survey. National poverty measurement reports both absolute and relative poverty estimates. The abso-
lute poverty line is the cost of the subsistence minimum which is calculated based on the expenditure structure of the poorest deciles and is approved by the
government. The relative poverty line is 60% of median average per capita income. In 2013, according to the most recently published figures, 5.5% of the population lived in
absolute poverty.* The most recent national strategy for statistical development in Belarus spans the years 2012-2015, and is in the process of implementation. The most recent
household sample survey available for Belarus in the World Bank’s regional internal microdata catalog, the ECA Data Portal, is for the year 2010.
NATIONAL DATA
*Source: National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus.
Tot al P oor Non-P oor P oor Non-P oor Bot t om 4 0 % Top 6 0 % YearD em ograph ic sShare of total population (%) 100% 0% 100% 1% 99% 40% 60% 2010% of group living in rural areas 26% 26% 78% 25% 39% 18% 2010% of group living in urban areas 74% 74% 22% 75% 61% 82% 2010% of households with 4+ members 21% 21% 49% 20% 34% 14% 2010Dependency Ratio: Children (0-14)/all HH members 0.24 0.24 0.43 0.23 0.36 0.17 2010Dependency Ratio: Elderly 65+/all HH members 0.19 0.19 0.10 0.19 0.20 0.18 2010Share of households with Female Head (%) 63% 63% 57% 63% 61% 64% 2010Average HH size 2.44 2.44 3.72 2.43 2.89 2.22 2010
Educ at ionProportion of group with None/<Primary (%) 4% 4% 8% 4% 6% 2% 2010Proportion of group with Basic (%) 8% 8% 15% 8% 12% 6% 2010Proportion of group with Gen sec (%) 21% 21% 37% 21% 25% 20% 2010Proportion of group with Spec sec (%) 47% 47% 37% 47% 47% 46% 2010Proportion of group with Tertiary sec (%) 20% 20% 3% 20% 9% 26% 2010
Ac c ess t o Ec onom ic Opp ort un it iesLabor force participation rate (% of population aged 15-64) 78% 78% 65% 78% 74% 80% 2010Unemployment (% of population aged 15-64) 5% 5% 18% 4% 7% 3% 2010Self-employed (% of population aged 15-64) 2% 2% 0% 2% 1% 2% 2010
I nc om eShare of income from pensions (%)Share of income from labor (%)
Ac c ess t o Basic Serv ic esCentral heating (% of HHs) 87% 87% 59% 87% 80% 92% 2012Access to gas (% of HHs) 69% 69% 56% 69% 64% 74% 2012Access to piped water in house (% of HHs) 89% 89% 75% 90% 84% 94% 2012Access to sewerage in house (% of HHs) 87% 87% 75% 87% 81% 92% 2012Access to toilet in house (% of HHs) 81% 81% 64% 81% 73% 87% 2012Access to electricity (% of HHs)Refrigerator (% of HHs) 98% 98% 97% 98% 98% 99% 2012Home phone (% of HHs)Cell phone (% of HHs)Personal computer (% of HHs) 72% 72% 15% 72% 65% 78% 2012Less than 1.5 people per room (% of HHs) 65% 65% 47% 65% 57% 73% 2012