Top Banner
Industrial Air Quality Monitoring
21

Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Industrial Air Quality Monitoring

Page 2: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Sampling Protocols

• Grab vs. Integrated

• Personal vs. Area

Page 3: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Grab Sampling

• Measure the concentration of an airborne substance over a short time period (e.g. less than 5 minutes)

• Effective as a screening technique to determine if more extensive monitoring is warranted

• Not usually used to calculate TWA values, since sample times are rarely representative

Page 4: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Integrated Sampling

• a.k.a. Continuous Sampling

• Used to estimate 8-hour and 15-minute TWA exposures by collecting one or more samples over the duration of the task period

• “Integrates” the various concentrations to which the worker has been exposed

Page 5: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Personal Sampling

• Preferred method of evaluating worker exposure to airborne chemicals

• Worker wears sampling device that collects sample wherever worker is, whatever they’re doing

• Aperture should be as close as possible to breathing zone (hemisphere in front of the shoulders with radius of 6-9 inches)

Page 6: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Area Sampling

• Evaluate background concentrations associated with a place (rather than with a worker)

• Effective in investigating suspected leaks or “hot spots”

• Not usually used to calculate TWA values, since the location is rarely representative of worker’s breathing zone

Page 7: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Collection Devices

• Direct reading

• Evacuated containers

• Absorption

• Adsorption

• Filters

• Passive vs. active

Page 8: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Direct Reading

• Provide “immediate” indication of concentration

• Example: Colorimetric (“stain”) indicator tubes (“Draeger tubes”)

• Electronic sensors available for some gases

Page 9: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.
Page 10: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Evacuated Containers

• Reverse aerosol can

• Plastic sampling bags

Page 11: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.
Page 12: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Absorption

• Gas or vapor passed through absorbing liquid (e.g. acid vapors through deionized water)

• Effective with reactive, soluble compounds

• Absorption efficiency must be considered when calculating concentration in air from concentration in absorbent liquid

Page 13: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Adsorption

• Alternative for insoluble or nonreactive gases

• Solid sorbent (such as granular activated carbon or silica gel) provides sites to which contaminant molecules are attracted through van der Waals forces

• Carbon adsorption tubes one of the most commonly used active collectors

Page 14: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Anatomy of an Adsorption Tube

• Charcoal made from coconut shell: large adsorptive surface area and nonpolar (so it prefers organic vapors rather than water &c)

• Standard tube 7cm long by 4 mm wide– 1st section contains 100 mg charcoal and a

fiberglass, glass wool, or urethane foam plug

– 2nd section (“backup”) contains 50 mg charcoal to detect “breakthrough”: > 10% back/front

Page 15: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Filters

• Commonly used for particulates

• Filter material chosen based upon analysis:– Weight (total particulates within capture range)– Chemical composition (need material that

dissolves or ashes to permit analysis)– Size categorization (translucence to permit

microscopy for particle sizing and counting)

Page 16: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Passive vs. Active Monitoring

• Passive monitors allow personal sampling without pumps

• Rely on diffusion (movement across concentration gradient

• Example: Organic vapor monitor

• Active monitors use pumps to move air through collection device

Page 17: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.
Page 18: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Analytical Methods

• Sources of error– Determinate error (bias)– Indeterminate error (random)

Page 19: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

On-site Analysis

• Stain (indicator) tubes

• Direct reading instruments

Page 20: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Laboratory Analysis

• Gas Chromatography– Thermal Conductivity Detector– Flame Ionization Detector– Electron Capture Detector

• Atomic Absorption

• Spectrophotometry– IR, Visible, UV

Page 21: Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.