2013 Sediment Reductions A total reduction of 1,661,636 tons of sediment statewide. Indiana Conservation Partnership Region 5 Model Load Reductions Introduction Methodology Upper White 30,625 Kankakee 42,660 Tippecanoe 89,142 Lower White 153,826 St Joseph (MI) 173,140 Whitewater 53,904 Patoka 48,223 Sugar 21,516 Driftwood 21,656 Wildcat 76,642 Eel (WFWR) 106,160 Blue-Sinking 229,600 Iroquois 15,628 Lower East Fork White 392,444 Eel (WR) 207,277 Muscatatuck 93,201 Upper Wabash 73,511 Middle Wabash-Little Vermillion 123,487 Mississinewa 7,446 Salamonie 18,098 Middle Wabash-Busseron 72,546 Lower Wabash 48,873 Flatrock-Haw 9,542 St Marys 17,459 Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon 203,371 St Joseph (OH) 118,817 Middle Ohio-Laughery 75,004 Upper East Fork White 97,112 Middle Wabash-Deer 22,126 Silver-Little Kentucky 65,112 Highland-Pigeon 51,259 Little Calumet-Galien 2,362 Maumee 9,873 Auglaize 732 Vermilion 5,779 Chicago 288 Vermilion 5,779 Lower Great Miami 2,122 Upper Great Miami 228 Lower Great Miami 2,122 Upper White 16,116 Kankakee 21,503 Tippecanoe 49,647 Lower White 78,025 St Joseph (MI) 90,259 Whitewater 26,946 Sugar 10,742 Driftwood 10,812 Wildcat 38,637 Eel (WFWR) 52,795 Blue-Sinking 115,353 Iroquois 8,325 Eel (WR) 104,206 Muscatatuck 52,319 Patoka 25,340 Lower East Fork White 194,719 Upper Wabash 36,425 Middle Wabash-Little Vermillion 99,659 Mississinewa 3,658 Salamonie 9,133 Middle Wabash-Busseron 46,794 Lower Wabash 24,209 Flatrock-Haw 5,991 St Marys 9,223 Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon 100,647 St Joseph (OH) 61,127 Middle Ohio-Laughery 42,842 Upper East Fork White 48,598 Middle Wabash-Deer 11,319 Silver-Little Kentucky 38,473 Highland-Pigeon 25,287 Little Calumet-Galien 1,194 Maumee 4,875 Auglaize 374 Vermilion 3,041 Chicago 140 Vermilion 3,041 Lower Great Miami 1,060 Upper Great Miami 114 Lower Great Miami 1,060 Nitrogen Reduction (lbs.\year) 1 - 50,000 50,001 - 200,000 200,001 - 300,000 300,001 - 400,000 2013 Nitrogen Reductions 2013 Phosphorus Reductions Upper White 15,171 Kankakee 17,535 Tippecanoe 54,089 Lower White 85,089 Sugar 8,765 St Joseph (MI) 102,263 Whitewater 23,715 Patoka 64,130 Driftwood 8,865 Wildcat 31,041 Eel (WFWR) 51,707 Blue-Sinking 146,742 Iroquois 7,036 Lower East Fork White 244,034 Eel (WR) 91,299 Muscatatuck 61,696 Upper Wabash 27,325 Middle Wabash-Little Vermillion 113,597 Mississinewa 3,258 Salamonie 6,536 Middle Wabash-Busseron 87,309 Lower Wabash 26,104 Flatrock-Haw 8,115 St Marys 9,187 Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon 121,867 St Joseph (OH) 58,578 Middle Ohio-Laughery 47,811 Upper East Fork White 42,484 Middle Wabash-Deer 8,809 Silver-Little Kentucky 47,588 Highland-Pigeon 30,784 Little Calumet-Galien 846 Maumee 4,343 Auglaize 284 Vermilion 2,337 Chicago 199 Vermilion 2,337 Lower Great Miami 987 Upper Great Miami 114 Lower Great Miami 987 Sediment Reduction (tons\year) Phosphorus Reduction (lbs.\year) A total reduction of 2,780,790 pounds of nitrogen statewide. A total reduction of 1,469,926 pounds of phosphorus statewide. DEB FAIRHURST CHRIS MORSE LOU RENSHAW DOUG NUSBAUM (Tillage Trends By County) (Separate Data Flow Process) (Total Funding By County) (Separate Data Flow Process) (By County) SUSAN HOVERMALE (By Watershed) *Data Sharing Privacy Agreements are in place ** http://it.tetratech-ffx.com/steplweb/models$docs.htm ***Incorporated into the Indiana Nutrient Reduction Strategy Last updated 9/25/14 Original Data Source Data Server Location Agency Point of Contact Total Practices Installed 2013 Conservation Accomplishments Indiana's Soil and Water Conservation Districts Data Provided By: Poster Created By:
1
Embed
Indiana Conservation Partnership Region 5 Model Load Reductions · 2019-07-25 · 2013 Sediment Reductions A total Jreduction of 1,661,636 tons of sediment statewide. Indiana Conservation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
2013 Sediment Reductions
A total reduction of 1,661,636 tonsof sediment statewide.
Indiana Conservation Partnership Region 5 Model Load ReductionsIntroduction Methodology
A total reduction of 2,780,790 poundsof nitrogen statewide.
A total reduction of 1,469,926 poundsof phosphorus statewide.
The India na Co nservatio n Partnership is c o m prised o f eight India na a genc ies a nd o rga niza tio ns who share a c o m m o n go a l o f pro m o ting c o nservatio n. To that end, the m issio n o f the India na Co nservatio n Partnership is to pro vide tec hnic a l, fina nc ia l a nd educ atio na l assista nc e needed to im plem ent ec o no m ic a lly a nd enviro nm enta lly c o m patib le la nd a nd water stewardship dec isio ns, pra c tic es a nd tec hno lo gies.In 2013, m em b ers o f the India na Co nservatio n Partnership (ICP) b ega n using the Enviro nm enta l Pro tec tio n Agenc y’s (EPA) Regio n 5 Nutrient Lo a d Reductio n m o del to determ ine the im pa c t o f insta lled c o nservatio n pra c tic es im plem ented b y the ICP Co nservatio n Im plem entatio n Tea m s o n India na 's water qua lity.The ICP a do pted the Regio n 5 Nutrient Lo a d Reductio n m o del to a na lyze c o nservatio n pra c tic es funded b y state pro gra m s suc h as the India na State Departm ent o f Agriculture's Clea n W a ter India na Pro gra m a nd the India na Departm ent o f Natura l Reso urc es' La ke a nd River Enha nc em ent Pro gra m , as well as federa lly funded pro gra m s inc luding EPA's Sectio n-319 Pro gra m a nd U SDA’s Farm Bill Pro gra m .Fo r c a lenda r yea r 2013, the ICP Co nservatio n Im plem entatio n Tea m s insta lled 30,775 c o nservatio n pra c tic es. A to ta l o f 15,322 o f tho se pra c tic es c o uld b e a na lyzed using the Regio n 5 Nutrient Lo a d Reductio n M o del, whic h estim ated a nnua l reductio ns o f sedim ent, as well as nitro gen a nd pho spho rus tied to sedim ent ero sio n (b ro wn, green a nd b lue m aps, respectively). These reductio ns c o ntinue fo r the life o f the pra c tic es m o deled (e.g., grassed waterwa ys are designed to b e 10-year pra c tic es, while c o ver cro ps are 1-year pra c tic es, esta b lished a nnua lly). Reductio ns indisso lved nutrients, suc h as disso lved rea c tive pho spho rus (DRP) a nd nitrate (NO3), are no t a c c o unted fo r b y the regio n 5 m o del. The rem a ining ICP pra c tic es were no t m o deled b ec a use they were no t asso c ia ted with sedim ent lo ss o r were no t c o vered b y the EPA Regio n 5 m o del. This effo rt represents ICP-assisted c o nservatio n in India na .India na is the o nly state in the c o untry to a do pt a m o del a m o ng so m a ny partners to estim a te c o nservatio n im pa c t o n a statewide sc a le. As part o fIndia na ’s Nutrient Reductio n Strategy, this m o deling effo rt illustrates the c o ntinued suc c ess a nd c ha llenges o f c o nservatio n a nd serves as a to o l to help set watershed prio rity a nd reductio n targets, m a na ge c o nservatio n reso urc es, a nd to further sta keho lder invo lvem ent at a ll levels o f go vernm ent within a nd a c ro ss India na .
ISDA/SWCD DATA
CREP & CWIIndianapolis
DEB FAIRHURST
NRCS DATAFARM BILL*Washin g ton D.C.CHRIS MORSE
IDEM DATAEPA –319Indianapolis
LOU RENSHAW
FSA DATACRPSU SAN
HOVERMALE
DNR DATALARE
IndianapolisDOUG
NUSBAUM
DATA CONSOLIDATION& QU ALITY CONTROLDEB FAIRHU RST
ISDA
SPRING/FALLTILLAGE TRANSECTDATA***
http://www.in .g ov/isda(Tillage Trends By County)
(Separate Data Flow Process)
ICP FINANCIAL REPORTSWEB APPLICATION***
http://www.in .g ov/isda/icpreports/(Total Funding By County)
(Separate Data Flow Process)
ANNU AL ICP CONSERVATION WORKLOAD REPORT***(By County)
FSA DATACRP
Kansas CitySUSAN
HOVERMALE
QU ARTERLY (CY) EPA REGION 5 LOAD
REDU CTION MODELING**ISDA STAFF
ANNU AL REGION 5 MODEL LOAD REDU CTION MAPS***
(By Watershed)
REGION 5 MODEL DATA
CONSOLIDATION & QU ALITY CONTROLDEB FAIRHU RST
ISDA
PU BLISHED TO ISDA & ICP WEBSITES
http://www.in .g ov/isdahttp://iaswcd.org/icp/
PU BLISHED TO ISDA & ICP WEBSITES
http://www.in .g ov/isdahttp://iaswcd.org/icp/
*Data Sharing Privacy Agreements are in place** http://it.tetratech-ffx.com/steplweb/models$docs.htm***Incorporated into the Indiana Nutrient Reduction Strategy Last updated 9/25/14
In dian a Con se rvation Partn e rship An n ual (CY) Workload Accoun tability Data FlowOriginal Data SourceData Server LocationAgency Point of Contact
Total Practices Installed20 - 139
146 - 288
315 - 546
619 - 915
1,126 - 2,136
2013 Conservation Accomplishments
Ja nuary 1 thru Dec em b er 31, 2013Co nservatio n Pra c tic es Co m pleted - 30,775Co nservatio n Pra c tic es U nderwa y - 2,393
Indiana's Soil and Water Conservation Districts
Data Provided By:
Poster Created By:Deb Fa irhurst, ISDA Pro gra m M a na gerDec em b er 8, 2014
ICP W eb site: http://ic p.iaswc d.o rgISDA W eb site: http://www.in.go v/isdaIDEM W eb site: http://www.in.go v/idemNRCS W eb site: http://www.nrc s.usda.go v/wps/po rta l/nrc s/site/in/ho m e