DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. U.S. Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION ™ Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access 26 September 2012 Asia Pacific/India Equity Research Cement India Cement Sector SECTOR REVIEW Pricing resilience; upgrade ACC to NEUTRAL Figure 1: Cement majors continue to remain in a sweet spot 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% (400) (200) - 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 FY12 EBITDA/Tonne FY12 PBT/Tonne FY12 Capacity Utilisation (RHS) FY12 Industry Utilisation (RHS) Regional Players FY12 Avg EBITDA/tonne – 1027 Avg PBT/tonne – 471 Avg utilization – 62% Capacity share – 18% Cement Majors FY12 Avg EBITDA/tonne – 858 Avg PBT/tonne – 558 Avg utilization – 78% Capacity share – 45% High Utilization players FY12 Avg EBITDA/tonne – 438 Avg PBT/tonne – 218 Avg utilization – 92% Capacity share – 7% Source: Company data, CMA, Credit Suisse estimates ■ Cement prices continue to remain firm. Our recent channel checks suggest that cement prices continue to surprise positively and have declined only 2% versus our expectation of a 4% decline in the September quarter. The cement industry’s pricing power has been aided by factors such as recovery in utilisation rates of cement majors (ACC, Ambuja and UltraTech), lower breakeven points of cement majors, and production discipline, which increasingly appears likely to be sustained. With higher-than-industry utilisations, lower leverage and higher profitability, cement majors remain well positioned in the industry, as smaller regional players face either leverage concerns or high utilisations with low profits. ■ The key negative catalysts we anticipated largely played out. We had three key concerns about the sector: (1) adverse impact of rising costs, low industry utilisations and weak demand; (2) impact of adverse ruling on cartel, and (3) valuation risk arising from multiple and earnings de-rating. The industry, however, has navigated the challenging phase by maintaining production discipline (sacrificing volume to protect margins)—despite ruling on cartelisation by the CCI, and weak demand. ■ Outlook incrementally turning favourable. Cement industry’s cost pressures are beginning to subside (coal, etc.), and capacity pressures are easing (utilisations near trough). Continued production discipline (lower cash flow volatility) and pricing power pose the risk of consensus estimates lagging. We revise up our estimates of cement majors to factor in higher cement prices. ■ Upgrade ACC; prefer ICEM as a beneficiary of mean reversion. Valuations of cement majors (ex-ACC) are above historical averages and do not factor in any impact of CCI penalty (~4% impact on valuation). ACC’s underperformance vs Ambuja and UltraTech post the CCI order makes its valuation more reasonable (Figure 9). We upgrade ACC to NEUTRAL, and prefer ICEM as a mean reversion beneficiary given its significant valuation divergence to cement majors. Research Analysts Sandeep Mathew 91 22 6777 3715 [email protected]Kush Shah +91 22 6777 3862 [email protected]
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. U.S. Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION™
Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access
26 September 2012
Asia Pacific/India
Equity Research
Cement
India Cement Sector SECTOR REVIEW
Pricing resilience; upgrade ACC to NEUTRAL
Figure 1: Cement majors continue to remain in a sweet spot
that cement prices continue to surprise positively and have declined only 2% versus our expectation of a 4% decline in the September quarter. The cement industry’s pricing power has been aided by factors such as recovery in utilisation rates of cement majors (ACC, Ambuja and UltraTech), lower breakeven points of cement majors, and production discipline, which increasingly appears likely to be sustained. With higher-than-industry utilisations, lower leverage and higher profitability, cement majors remain well positioned in the industry, as smaller regional players face either leverage concerns or high utilisations with low profits.
■ The key negative catalysts we anticipated largely played out. We had three
key concerns about the sector: (1) adverse impact of rising costs, low industry utilisations and weak demand; (2) impact of adverse ruling on cartel, and (3) valuation risk arising from multiple and earnings de-rating. The industry, however, has navigated the challenging phase by maintaining production discipline (sacrificing volume to protect margins)—despite ruling on cartelisation by the CCI, and weak demand.
■ Outlook incrementally turning favourable. Cement industry’s cost pressures are
beginning to subside (coal, etc.), and capacity pressures are easing (utilisations near trough). Continued production discipline (lower cash flow volatility) and pricing power pose the risk of consensus estimates lagging. We revise up our estimates of cement majors to factor in higher cement prices.
■ Upgrade ACC; prefer ICEM as a beneficiary of mean reversion. Valuations of
cement majors (ex-ACC) are above historical averages and do not factor in any impact of CCI penalty (~4% impact on valuation). ACC’s underperformance vs Ambuja and UltraTech post the CCI order makes its valuation more reasonable (Figure 9). We upgrade ACC to NEUTRAL, and prefer ICEM as a mean reversion beneficiary given its significant valuation divergence to cement majors.
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Note: Size of bubble represents EV
Cement major’s utilisations
are above industry
utilisations.
Smaller regional players,
face leverage concerns, or
high utilisations with low
profits.
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 8
Figure 21: Cement majors (ex-Jaypee) are comfortably placed with strong balance sheets
(1.0)
-
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Capacity Utilisation
Deb
t/Equ
ity
Chettinad
DalmiaOCL IndiaIndia Cements
Binani
Heidelberg
BIrla Corp
Jaypee
Century Tex
JK Cement
Madras Cement
Shree Cement
ACCAmbuja
Ultratech
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Note: Size of bubble represents EV
Further, the cost structures of the top 15 cement manufacturers (70% of current industry
capacity) suggest that there is not much of a significant cost advantage for the smaller
players vis-à-vis cement majors. Thus, improvement in utilisations will have to be primarily
driven by aggressive pricing, which in the current environment is unlikely.
Figure 22: Comparable cost structures seen for smaller and larger cement firms
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
Realisation EBITDA Raw Material Power Freight Other Costs Total Costs
Cement Majors (Rs. per tonne) Smaller Companies (Rs. per tonne)
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
Cement majors’ breakeven points have been on the decline
Break-even levels for top three cement majors are low at 23% and have been declining.
While smaller cement companies have higher break-even levels (approximately 42%),
their current utilisations remain well above the break-even levels, which is one of the key
reasons for lack of distress despite low utilisations.
Lower break-even points have been aided by factors including declining leverage as large
cement companies have been generating strong cash flows over the past few years.
Further, the variable costs (power, freight) have structurally risen at a faster pace over the
past few years.
Break-even level for cement
majors average 23% versus
smaller players of 42%
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 9
Figure 23: BEP for cement majors is at 23% Figure 24: Smaller manufacturers have higher BEP than
cement majors, but still a comfortable cushion
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Break Even Utilisation Capacity Utilisation
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Break Even Utilisation Capacity Utilisation
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
Figure 25: Variable cost per tonne has almost doubled in the past five years for cement
majors
1,500
1,700
1,900
2,100
2,300
2,500
2,700
2,900
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Variable Cost (Rs. per tonne)
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 10
The key negative catalysts we anticipated have largely played out We anticipated industry profitability to be impacted by rising freight and power costs,
upcoming capacity additions, and adverse CCI order. Majority of the cost pressures seem
to be behind us and industry appears to have dealt with the cost hikes.
Freight cost pressures appear largely done
Freight costs amount to approximately 28% of the total cost and 20% of sales of cement
majors. While rail freight was hiked by approximately 25% in March 2012, diesel prices
were hiked by approximately 14% last week.
The industry’s dependence on road transport is significant at 45%; however, smaller
regional cement companies have higher dependence on road transport, leaving them
more vulnerable to diesel price hikes.
In addition, captive diesel power plants and gensets account for 2% of total power
produced in FY12.
The increase in diesel prices is likely require a price hike of approximately 2% to offset the
cost increase.
Figure 26: EBITDA per tonne has improved sharply… Figure 27: …despite rising freight and power costs
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 Jun-12
Realisation (Rs. per tonne) EBITDA (Rs. per tonne) (RHS)
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 Jun-12
Power cost (Rs. per tonne) Freight cost (Rs. per tonne)
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Note: Data for
cement majors
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Note: Data for
cement majors
Capacity additions have come on-stream, but pricing
power continues…
Approximately 16mn tonne of cement capacity, which started operations in FY12, and
approximately 23mn tonne of new cement capacity in 1HFY13 has been activated, totaling
almost 12% of FY12 industry capacity.
Rail freight hike of 25% and
diesel price hike of 14% is
behind us.
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 11
Figure 28: Major capacity additions seen in FY12 and 1HFY13
Company State Capacity Commissioning Year
Shree Cement Rajasthan 1.4 FY12
KCP Ltd Andhra Pradesh 1.7 FY12
Chettinad Cement Tamil Nadu 2.5 FY12
Jaypee Jharkhand 2.1 FY12
Lafarge Jharkhand 1.2 FY12
JSW Cement Andhra Pradesh 4.5 FY13
ABG Cement Gujarat 5.8 FY13
Heidelberg Cement MP and UP 2.9 FY13
Jaypee Andhra Pradesh 5.0 FY13
Sagar Cements Karnataka 2.5 FY13
Wonder Cement Rajasthan 2.5 FY13
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
While ramp-ups of new capacities are likely to take time, we believe the full impact of
erstwhile capacity ramp-ups seen in FY10 and FY11 (totaling 110 mn tonne, 33% of
industry capacity) should have begun to take full effect.
However, these capacities have not impacted pricing power, and appear less likely to
impact as almost 25% of total cement capacity additions between FY07-12 (totaling 43 mn
tonne) have been pure grinding capacities, which are cheaper cost and easier to idle.
Going forward, the pace of new capacity additions in FY13E is expected to be around 14%
of FY12 production and gradually slow down.
Figure 29: Pace of capacity additions set to slow Figure 30: Pure grinding capacities have accounted for
25% of FY07-12 capacity additions
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
-
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13E FY14E FY15E
Capacity Additions (mn tonnes) % of Production (RHS)
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Greenfield Brownfield Grinding
Capacity additions during FY07 to FY12 (mn tonnes)
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
Pure grinding additions likely to continue running at low utilisations
While total rated cement capacity in India is 337mn tonne, clinker capacity is 225mn
tonne, which can support a total effective production of only 311 mn tonne of cement
(assuming current 25:67:8 OPC:PPC:Slag ratio and 100% clinker utilisation).
The differential between 311 mn tonne and 337mn tonne of pure grinding capacity will
remain a structural excess, in our view.
Clinker utilisations have bottomed, in our view, despite overall cement capacity utilisations
only troughing in FY13E (assuming demand grows at 9% in FY13).
Activation of FY10 and
FY11 capacity additions,
totalling 33 mn t, 33% of
industry has not impacted
pricing power.
Current grinding capacity
excesses of approximately
26 mn t (8% of cement
capacity) would increase to
35 mn t in FY13E and 38
mn t in FY14E.
Pace of capacity additions
to slow.
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 12
Figure 31: Clinker utilisations have bottomed in FY12… Figure 32: …grinding capacity excesses unlikely threat
ACC more immune to forthcoming cost pressures Less dependence on road
ACC has the lowest exposure to road transport and, thus, is more favorably placed among cement majors to tackle the diesel price hike.
We estimate that cement manufacturers have to raise prices by approximately 2% to off-set cost pressures should the current diesel price hike of 14% sustain.
Figure 51: ACC has the least dependence on road
transport…
Figure 52: … resulting in the least impact of diesel price
hike
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
ACC Ambuja Cement UltratechCement
India Cements IndustryAverage
Rail Road Sea
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
ACC Ambuja Ultratech India Cements
FY14 - Impact on EBITDA FY14 - Impact on Net profit
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
Higher renewable energy exposure
Given the recent order by the Rajasthan High Court ruling captive power generation companies are liable to pay penalties in case they do not comply with renewable energy requirements of the State, in our view ACC is better placed than peers to meet renewable energy requirements.
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 20
Figure 53: % of generation through renewable sources in
FY12
Figure 54: ACC has higher renewable power capacity
2.2%
0.8%
0.5%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
ACC Ambuja Ultratech
% of power generation through renewable sources - FY12
7.5%
4.2%
0.7%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
ACC Ambuja Ultratech
% of power capacity through renewable sources - FY12
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
Consensus upgrades likely to continue
As seen in the past one year, earnings have been upgraded by 25% primarily driven by
improving realisations. With easing cost pressures, improving utilisation outlook, and
realisations continue to improve, we believe consensus upgrades are likely to continue.
EV/EBITDA - Cement Majors EV/EBITDA - India Cements
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 22
Key risks Threat of government intervention
Cement companies have seen increasing political pressure on account of rising cement
prices in 2012 (primarily in cement producing states which account for approximately 35%
of total cement demand). Some of the local governments have threatened to withdraw
subsidies in case cement companies do not cut prices.
Figure 60: States action to curb cement prices could be crucial
Date Region Allegations Result
Jul-12 North East Cement firms asked to cut prices after reports that
firms get high subsidies and earn high profits
Prices cut by 7-8% (25-
30/bag) in Assam
TN CM threatens to withdraw subsidies and
concessions to cement companies if prices go
unchecked
Prices have remained
stable over 4 months
May &
July 2012
AP, Rayalseema Opposition parties ask for CM intervention to
check rising cement prices
Prices have fallen by 20%
in Hyderabad over 2
months
Jan-12 Himachal Pradesh CM meets cement companies, and industries
minister threatens to withdraw subsidies
Cement prices decreased
by Rs.25/ bag from Rs.
330 /bag
Jan &
Feb 2012
Chattisgarh, Raipur Protests over rising cement prices by both
opposition and ruling party
Cement prices decrease
by Rs.50/ bag
Apr-12 Maharashtra,
Chandrapur
Former Congress MP demands cement prices be
brought down and intervention by CM
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
Penalties arising from adverse cartel ruling by CCI
Cement companies have been fined by the Competition Commission of India for alleged
cartelisation to the extent of 0.5% of profits. While we believe this remains an overhang,
cement companies are likely to challenge the order with the COMPAT and if unsuccessful
with the Supreme Court. The legal process is expected to remain long-drawn.
Figure 61: Fines still have not been accounted for
Company Penalty (Rs bn)
Jaiprakash Associates 13.24
Ultratech 11.75
Ambuja 11.64
ACC 11.48
Lafarge 4.80
Shree Cement 3.98
Century 2.74
Madras 2.59
India Cements 1.87
Binani 1.67
JK Cement 1.29
Source: CCI order
Threat of imports
In 2007, India witnessed imports from China at Rs. 160 per bag, as compared to average
price of Rs. 230 per bag locally. Imports were facilitated by the sharp price increases seen
during that period (prices increased by 27% over a period of a year).
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 23
Currently, average realisations in China are at approximately Rmb305 (Rs 2,100) per t as
compared to Rs 4,200 in India. A key constraint, however, is obtaining BIS certification
(currently only two Chinese companies possess the same).
Pakistani imports likely to remain low
Despite granting of MFN status and removal of trade barriers, cement imports from
Pakistan have been fairly low due to procedural bottlenecks at the border and high
dependence on rail (almost 70%) wherein service availability is poor.
Figure 62: Cement imports have been on decline… Figure 63: …as imports from Pakistan/China have declined
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Value of Imports (USD mn)
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12
Pakistan Bangladesh China Others
Value of imports (Rs. mn)
Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Ministry of Commerce, Credit Suisse estimates
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 24
Companies
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 25
Asia Pacific / India
Cement
ACC Ltd.
(ACC.BO / ACC IN) UPGRADE RATING
A safe haven
■ Exposure to regions with resilient pricing driving EBITDA/tonne improvements. Cement prices continue to perform better than our expectation in September quarter (down 2% versus our expectation of 4%). The decline has been least in Central and Southern regions, where ACC has a 49% capacity exposure. We are factoring EBITDA/tonne to improve to Rs.1,018/tonne in CY12E (from Rs.709/tonne in CY11A) and stay flat in CY13E. While ACC’s recent underperformance could be attributable to weaker volume growth (YTD 2.3% YoY, vs Ambuja at 6.4% and Ultratech at 4.6%), its utilizations (81%) remain well above industry average (69%).
■ Higher immunity to upcoming cost pressures. ACC’s lower dependence on road freight (approximately 45% of total freight compared to 60% for Ambuja and Ultratech) makes it least exposed to the recent 14% hike in diesel prices. Further, its focus on renewable energy (currently generates 2.2% of captive power through renewable and can increase up to 7.5% of total) assumes significance due to the recent order by the Rajasthan High Court ruling captive power generation companies are liable to pay penalties in case they do not comply with renewable energy requirements of the State. We believe the order can set a precedent for other states to enforce such minimum renewable energy requirements. While minimum renewable energy power generation norms vary, it is between 4-10% for the major cement producing states in FY13. The benefit of lower international coal prices (approximately 25% of total consumption), is also likely to help ACC to sustain profitability in CY12/CY13E.
■ Valuations below historical multiples; Upgrade to NEUTRAL. ACC is currently trading at 8.2x CY13E EV/EBITDA, versus its historical average of 8.5x and is most attractively valued among cement majors. It also appears lower risk as current valuations do not price in significant CY13E EBITDA/tonne improvement compared to Ambuja and Ultratech. At Rs. 7,895 CY12E EV/t, it is trading at a 18% discount to Ambuja and Ultratech, and a 7% discount to replacement cost. We upgrade estimates of ACC to reflect improved realizations and anticipate CY12E EBITDA/tonne to sustain in CY13E as industry utilizations improve. We upgrade ACC to NEUTRAL, with a target price of Rs. 1,462 (based on 8.5x EV/EBITDA).
Share price performance
80
130
180
800
1000
1200
1400
Oct-10 Feb-11 Jun-11 Oct-11 Feb-12 Jun-12
Price (LHS) Rebased Rel (RHS)
The price relative chart measures performance against the BSE
SENSEX IDX which closed at 18694.41 on 25/09/12
On 25/09/12 the spot exchange rate was Rs53.52/US$1
Total liabilities 165,407 187,485 225,376 240,907 269,616
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 34
Asia Pacific / India
Cement
India Cements
(ICMN.BO / ICEM IN)
Cost savings key to valuation re-rating
■ Low volume growth with profitability focus likely to continue. Capacities in the South remain under pressure due to new additions, and we expect existing cement players in the South (including India Cements) to continue to lose market share, and sacrifice volume growth to maintain profitability. Higher leverage among the smaller Southern players is unlikely to lead to price war in a weak demand environment, in our view. South continues to enjoy the highest realizations and consequently better EBITDA/tonne despite low utilizations and checks continue to indicate that prices are most
resilient in the Southern region.
■ Leverage concerns to ease, declining power costs to positively impact ICEM. We believe ICEM’s debt-equity remains under control at 0.67x, and
FY13E interest coverage remains comfortable at 3.2x. Decline in power costs remains a key catalyst for the stock, in our view. ICEM’s power cost (currently 24% of sales) is likely to benefit from the new CPPs (48 MW) commissioned, and incremental ramp-up of power plant in FY13 will reduce its dependence on expensive grid power in Andhra Pradesh and Tamilnadu (potential cost saving of Rs.0.8/ unit or approximately Rs.330 mn in power costs). Further, ICEM also has the highest proportion of imported coal usage
(70%), which is likely to further benefit power costs.
■ Valuation discount to cement majors has widened – Mean reversion points to significant upside. India Cements currently trades at 4.5x FY14E
EV/EBITDA (29% discount to historical multiple) and FY13E EV/tonne of Rs. 3,385, which is at 60% discount to replacement cost. On EV/EBITDA, the stock trades at a 50% discount to the cement majors, versus its historical average discount of 12% (refer Figure 94). We believe improvement in fundamentals driven by cost improvements, is likely to narrow the discount to cement majors. As the South market continues to remain in a downcycle, we value India Cements at its historical EV/tonne multiple of 4,074x based on FY12 capacity of 15MT, to arrive at a target price of Rs. 117 (we do not
value the IPL franchise).
Share price performance
60
80
100
120
60
80
100
120
140
Oct-10 Feb-11 Jun-11 Oct-11 Feb-12 Jun-12
Price (LHS) Rebased Rel (RHS)
The price relative chart measures performance against the BSE
SENSEX IDX which closed at 18694.41 on 25/09/12
On 25/09/12 the spot exchange rate was Rs53.52/US$1
I, Sandeep Mathew, certify that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of my compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.
See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names.
3-Year Price, Target Price and Rating Change History Chart for ACC.BO
The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received compensation that is based upon various factors including Credit Suisse's total revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's investment banking activities.
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 39
Analysts’ stock ratings are defined as follows: Outperform (O): The stock’s total return is expected to outperform the relevant benchmark* by at least 10-15% (or more, depending on perceived risk) over the next 12 months. Neutral (N): The stock’s total return is expected to be in line with the relevant benchmark* (range of ±10-15%) over the next 12 months. Underperform (U): The stock’s total return is expected to underperform the relevant benchmark* by 10-15% or more over the next 12 months. *Relevant benchmark by region: As of 29th May 2009, Australia, New Zealand, U.S. and Canadian ratings are based on (1) a stock’s absolute total return potential to its current share price and (2) the relative attractiveness of a stock’s total return potential within an analyst’s coverage universe**, with Outperforms representing the most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. Some U.S. and Canadian ratings may fall outside the absolute total return ranges defined above, depending on market conditions and industry factors. For Latin American, Japanese, and non-Japan Asia stocks, ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark; for European stocks, ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe**. For Australian and New Zealand stocks, 12-month rolling yield is incorporated in the absolute total return calculation and a 15% and a 7.5% threshold replace the 10-15% level in the Outperform and Underperform stock rating definitions, respectively. The 15% and 7.5% thresholds replace the +10-15% and -10-15% levels in the Neutral stock rating definition, respectively. **An analyst's coverage universe consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. Restricted (R): In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications, including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other circumstances.
Volatility Indicator [V]: A stock is defined as volatile if the stock price has moved up or down by 20% or more in a month in at least 8 of the past 24 months or the analyst expects significant volatility going forward.
Analysts’ coverage universe weightings are distinct from analysts’ stock ratings and are based on the expected performance of an analyst’s coverage universe* versus the relevant broad market benchmark**: Overweight: Industry expected to outperform the relevant broad market benchmark over the next 12 months. Market Weight: Industry expected to perform in-line with the relevant broad market benchmark over the next 12 months. Underweight: Industry expected to underperform the relevant broad market benchmark over the next 12 months. *An analyst’s coverage universe consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. **The broad market benchmark is based on the expected return of the local market index (e.g., the S&P 500 in the U.S.) over the next 12 months.
Credit Suisse’s distribution of stock ratings (and banking clients) is:
Global Ratings Distribution Outperform/Buy* 44% (52% banking clients) Neutral/Hold* 42% (49% banking clients) Underperform/Sell* 11% (39% banking clients) Restricted 2%
*For purposes of the NYSE and NASD ratings distribution disclosure requirements, our stock ratings of Outperform, Neutral, and Underperform most closely correspond to Buy, Hold, and Sell, respectively; however, the meanings are not the same, as our stock ratings are determined on a relative basis. (Please refer to definitions above.) An investor's decision to buy or sell a security should be based on investment objectives, current holdings, and other individual factors.
Credit Suisse’s policy is to update research reports as it deems appropriate, based on developments with the subject company, the sector or the market that may have a material impact on the research views or opinions stated herein.
Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail please refer to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research: http://www.csfb.com/research-and-analytics/disclaimer/managing_conflicts_disclaimer.html
Credit Suisse does not provide any tax advice. Any statement herein regarding any US federal tax is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purposes of avoiding any penalties.
See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names. Price Target: (12 months) for (ACC.BO) Method: Our target price of Rs1,462 for ACC is based on its 10-year average historical EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.5x, and average CY13E and CY14E EBITDA of Rs. 28,755mn. Risks: Risks to our target price of Rs1,462 for ACC include: 1) input prices could surprise negatively, particularly the price of coal in domestic e-auctions 2) cement prices could surprise negatively on oversupply, and 3) overall India macro risks. Upside risks include cement volume growth in FY13E driven by a cyclical recovery, sustained price increases favourably impacting margins. Price Target: (12 months) for (ABUJ.BO) Method: Our target price of Rs194 for Ambuja is based on its 10-year average historical EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.7x, and average of CY13E and CY14E EBITDA of Rs.29,960mn Risks: Risks to our Rs194 target price for Ambuja Cements include the following: 1) Input prices could surprise negatively. 2) Cement prices could surprise negatively on oversupply. 3) Overall India macro risks. 4) Low-cost imports in Ambuja's main markets in the west and north. Upside risks include cement volume growth in FY13E driven by a cyclical recovery, sustained price increases favourably impacting margins. Price Target: (12 months) for (ICMN.BO)
26 September 2012
India Cement Sector 40
Method: Our target price of Rs 117 for India Cements is based on its 10-year average historical EV/Tonne of Rs.4075 and FY14E capacity of 15m tonnes. We believe EV/Tonne is a more representative method to value the company vis-a-vis EV/EBITDA that we have used for larger cement majors due to its high exposure to the on-going downcycle in the South Indian market, making its EBITDA more volatile than peers. Risks: The risks to our target price of Rs 117 on India Cements include the following: 1) Concentration of India Cements' business in the Southern region could be a risk. 2) Input costs, particularly coal, could surprise negatively. 3) Cement prices could surprise negatively. 4) Overall India macro risks Price Target: (12 months) for (ULTC.BO) Method: Our target price of Rs1,559 for Ultratech Cement is based on its 5-year average historical EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.1x and FY14E EBITDA of Rs.54,074mn. Risks: Potential risks to our Rs1,559 target price for Ultratech Cement include: 1) input prices could surprise negatively; 2) cement prices could surprise negatively on oversupply; 3) overall Indian macro risks and 4) further delays in commissioning/ramping up new capacities, all of which could adversely affect earnings. Upside risks include cement volume growth in FY13E driven by a cyclical recovery, sustained price increases favourably impacting margins.
Please refer to the firm's disclosure website at www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures for the definitions of abbreviations typically used in the target price method and risk sections.
See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names. The subject company (ICMN.BO, ULTC.BO) currently is, or was during the 12-month period preceding the date of distribution of this report, a client of Credit Suisse. Credit Suisse provided investment banking services to the subject company (ICMN.BO, ULTC.BO) within the past 12 months. Credit Suisse expects to receive or intends to seek investment banking related compensation from the subject company (ICMN.BO, ULTC.BO) within the next 3 months.
Important Regional Disclosures
Singapore recipients should contact a Singapore financial adviser for any matters arising from this research report.
The analyst(s) involved in the preparation of this report have not visited the material operations of the subject company (ACC.BO, ABUJ.BO, ICMN.BO, ULTC.BO) within the past 12 months.
Restrictions on certain Canadian securities are indicated by the following abbreviations: NVS--Non-Voting shares; RVS--Restricted Voting Shares; SVS--Subordinate Voting Shares. Individuals receiving this report from a Canadian investment dealer that is not affiliated with Credit Suisse should be advised that this report may not contain regulatory disclosures the non-affiliated Canadian investment dealer would be required to make if this were its own report. For Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.'s policies and procedures regarding the dissemination of equity research, please visit http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/canada_research_policy.shtml.
The following disclosed European company/ies have estimates that comply with IFRS: CRH.I, HOLN.VX, LAFP.PA.
As of the date of this report, Credit Suisse acts as a market maker or liquidity provider in the equities securities that are the subject of this report.
Principal is not guaranteed in the case of equities because equity prices are variable.
Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at anytime after that.
For Thai listed companies mentioned in this report, the independent 2010 Corporate Governance Report survey results published by the Thai Institute of Directors Association are being disclosed pursuant to the policy of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission: Siam Cement(Excellent). Taiwanese Disclosures: This research report is for reference only. Investors should carefully consider their own investment risk. Investment results are the responsibility of the individual investor. Reports may not be reprinted without permission of CS. Reports written by Taiwan-based analysts on non-Taiwan listed companies are not considered recommendations to buy or sell securities under Taiwan Stock Exchange Operational Regulations Governing Securities Firms Recommending Trades in Securities to Customers.
To the extent this is a report authored in whole or in part by a non-U.S. analyst and is made available in the U.S., the following are important disclosures regarding any non-U.S. analyst contributors: The non-U.S. research analysts listed below (if any) are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. The non-U.S. research analysts listed below may not be associated persons of CSSU and therefore may not be subject to the NASD Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account. • Sandeep Mathew, non-U.S. analyst, is a research analyst employed by Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited. • Kush Shah, non-U.S. analyst, is a research analyst employed by Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited.
For Credit Suisse disclosure information on other companies mentioned in this report, please visit the website at www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683. Disclaimers continue on next page.
26 September 2012
Asia Pacific / India
Equity Research
IN0302.doc
This report is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Credit Suisse AG, the Swiss bank, or its subsidiaries or its affiliates (“CS”) to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to CS. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of CS. All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of CS or its affiliates.
The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. CS may not have taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor. CS will not treat recipients as its customers by virtue of their receiving the report. The investments or services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment services. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation to you. CS does not offer advice on the tax consequences of investment and you are advised to contact an independent tax adviser. Please note in particular that the bases and levels of taxation may change. CS believes the information and opinions in the Disclosure Appendix of this report are accurate and complete. Information and opinions presented in the other sections of the report were obtained or derived from sources CS believes are reliable, but CS makes no representations as to their accuracy or completeness. Additional information is available upon request. CS accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to CS. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. CS may have issued, and may in the future issue, a trading call regarding this security. Trading calls are short term trading opportunities based on market events and catalysts, while stock ratings reflect investment recommendations based on expected total return over a 12-month period as defined in the disclosure section. Because trading calls and stock ratings reflect different assumptions and analytical methods, trading calls may differ directionally from the stock rating. In addition, CS may have issued, and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and CS is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report. CS is involved in many businesses that relate to companies mentioned in this report. These businesses include specialized trading, risk arbitrage, market making, and other proprietary trading. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgement at its original date of publication by CS and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and financial instruments is subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or income of such securities or financial instruments. Investors in securities such as ADR’s, the values of which are influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk. Structured securities are complex instruments, typically involve a high degree of risk and are intended for sale only to sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The market value of any structured security may be affected by changes in economic, financial and political factors (including, but not limited to, spot and forward interest and exchange rates), time to maturity, market conditions and volatility, and the credit quality of any issuer or reference issuer. Any investor interested in purchasing a structured product should conduct their own investigation and analysis of the product and consult with their own professional advisers as to the risks involved in making such a purchase.
Some investments discussed in this report have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when that investment is realised. Those losses may equal your original investment. Indeed, in the case of some investments the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment, in such circumstances you may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Income yields from investments may fluctuate and, in consequence, initial capital paid to make the investment may be used as part of that income yield. Some investments may not be readily realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments, similarly it may prove difficult for you to obtain reliable information about the value, or risks, to which such an investment is exposed. This report may provide the addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, websites. Except to the extent to which the report refers to website material of CS, CS has not reviewed the linked site and takes no responsibility for the content contained therein. Such address or hyperlink (including addresses or hyperlinks to CS’s own website material) is provided solely for your convenience and information and the content of the linked site does not in any way form part of this document. Accessing such website or following such link through this report or CS’s website shall be at your own risk. This report is issued and distributed in Europe (except Switzerland) by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, One Cabot Square, London E14 4QJ, England, which is regulated in the United Kingdom by The Financial Services Authority (“FSA”). This report is being distributed in Germany by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited Niederlassung Frankfurt am Main regulated by the Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht ("BaFin"). This report is being distributed in the United States by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC ; in Switzerland by Credit Suisse AG; in Canada by Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.; in Brazil by Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A. or its affiliates; in Mexico by Banco Credit Suisse (México), S.A. (transactions related to the securities mentioned in this report will only be effected in compliance with applicable regulation); in Japan by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited, Financial Instrument Firm, Director-General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kinsho) No. 66, a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Japan Securities Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; elsewhere in Asia/Pacific by whichever of the following is the appropriately authorised entity in the relevant jurisdiction: Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited, Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited , Credit Suisse Securities (Thailand) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch, Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (registration Nos. INB230970637; INF230970637; INB010970631; INF010970631), having registered address at 9th Floor, Ceejay House,Dr.A.B. Road, Worli, Mumbai - 18, India, T- +91-22 6777 3777, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, Seoul Branch, Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch, PT Credit Suisse Securities Indonesia, Credit Suisse Securities (Philippines ) Inc., and elsewhere in the world by the relevant authorised affiliate of the above. Research on Taiwanese securities produced by Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch has been prepared by a registered Senior Business Person. Research provided to residents of Malaysia is authorised by the Head of Research for Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., to whom they should direct any queries on +603 2723 2020. In jurisdictions where CS is not already registered or licensed to trade in securities, transactions will only be effected in accordance with applicable securities legislation, which will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may require that the trade be made in accordance with applicable exemptions from registration or licensing requirements. Non-U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should contact a CS entity in their local jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should do so only by contacting a representative at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in the U.S. Please note that this report was originally prepared and issued by CS for distribution to their market professional and institutional investor customers. Recipients who are not market professional or institutional investor customers of CS should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents. This research may relate to investments or services of a person outside of the UK or to other matters which are not regulated by the FSA or in respect of which the protections of the FSA for private customers and/or the UK compensation scheme may not be available, and further details as to where this may be the case are available upon request in respect of this report. Any Nielsen Media Research material contained in this report represents Nielsen Media Research's estimates and does not represent facts. NMR has neither reviewed nor approved this report and/or any of the statements made herein. If this report is being distributed by a financial institution other than Credit Suisse AG, or its affiliates, that financial institution is solely responsible for distribution. Clients of that institution should contact that institution to effect a transaction in the securities mentioned in this report or require further information. This report does not constitute investment advice by Credit Suisse to the clients of the distributing financial institution, and neither Credit Suisse AG, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors and employees accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from their use of this report or its content.
Copyright 2012 CREDIT SUISSE AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.