Top Banner
Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration
30

Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Independent Research:Language Learning

Johnathan Lansing

Gary Knoll

Laoleng Xiong

Keisuke Nishimoto

2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration

Page 2: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Agenda

• Introduction• Four perspectives of learning:

– Informal and formal learning– “Learning about” and “learning to be”– Exploration of different aspects of learning– Tools for learning vs tools for living

• Conclusion• Questions

Page 3: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Introduction

• Our focus is on second language learning of adults and children

• We studied the topic from four perspectives:– Informal and formal learning (Leng)– “Learning about” and “learning to be” (Kei)– Exploration of different aspects of learning (John)– Tools for learning vs tools for living (Gary)

• These four perspectives are mutually related, and we will show these relationships in terms of “motivation factor.”

Page 4: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Agenda

• Introduction• Four perspectives of learning:

– Informal and Formal learning– “Learning about” and “learning to be”– Exploration of different aspects of learning– Tools for learning vs tools for living

• Conclusion• Questions

Page 5: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Informal vs. Formal Learning

• Formal Learning– Happens in a classroom, same Teacher/Students.– Long periods of study.– Strict pre-approved curriculum.

• Informal Learning– Happens in open environments.– Short periods of study.– Loosely guided learning.

Page 6: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Examples of Learning

• Formal Learning– Classroom learning, with structure and guidance.– Has a certified/educated Instructor/Teacher.

• Informal Learning– On the job training or work-related.

Page 7: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Motivational Factors

• Learning factors for children.– Formal classroom is mainly extrinsic.– Informal learning is mainly intrinsic.– Combination of both types.

• Learning factors for adults.– Less formal and more informal.– Learning more driven by intrinsic motivation.– More clear distinction based on context.

Page 8: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Successful Learning

• Best approach seems to be a combination of both Formal and Informal learning.

• Neither one is better than the other, but best together.

• Adult learning lacks a Formal context.• Represents language learning.

Page 9: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Successful Language Learning

• Combination of both written and spoken.• Needs formal education to learn correctly:

– Grammar– Sentence Structure– Spelling

• Needs informal interaction to improve:– Pronunciation– Diction– Complete understanding

Page 10: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Agenda

• Introduction• Four perspectives of learning:

– Informal and formal learning– “Learning about” and “learning to be”– Exploration of different aspects of learning– Tools for learning vs tools for living

• Conclusion• Questions

Page 11: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

About “Learning about” and “Learning to be”

• “Learning about”– students learn as an outsider, mainly focusing on acquiring

knowledge about a subject, e.g. typical classroom lecture with textbook where students remain passive

• “Learning to be”– students learn as a practitioner, by actually performing a

subject, e.g. learning physics by performing an experiment

• They are not binary choices, rather two edges of spectrum

• In this research, we focused on language learning in study abroad context, with interviews with Japanese students studying English here.

Page 12: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Findings from Interview

• While they were in Japan, nobody had opportunity to use English outside classroom.

• Everyone tried to seek for opportunity to use English in US, even though they attended classes there.– One interviewee moved out twice to increase the level of

immersion– Another interviewee quit his school and turned to a private

lesson

• Everyone thought they should have studied more, especially grammar and vocabulary, before coming to US

Page 13: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

“Learning about” in Language Learning

• Classroom lectures with textbook, mainly focusing on reading, writing and grammar

• Not very motivating to students if they don’t see how the knowledge learned can be used in life

• Thus, in general main motivating factor is extrinsic, such as passing exam, marking higher test score etc.

• Still, “learning about” gives a necessary basis to start “learning to be”

Page 14: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

“Learning to be” in Language Learning

• “learning to be” is tough.– Gap between the level of English skills that students have

and those required to get involved in social activities– Prone to ‘breakdown’– Should be driven by strong intrinsic motivation

• Classroom settings can be “Learning to be” e.g. teaching topics in English

• Good scaffolding is necessary to support immersion into local life

• Some skills, especially grammar and sometimes vocabulary, may better be acquired by “learning about”

Page 15: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Agenda

• Introduction• Four perspectives of learning:

– Informal and formal learning– “Learning about” and “learning to be”– Exploration of different aspects of learning– Tools for learning vs tools for living

• Conclusion• Questions

Page 16: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Motivation’s Role in Learning

• Two types of motivation– Extrinsic, driven by extrinsic and material rewards– Intrinsic, driven by internal factors and intrinsic

rewards

• Motivation is the largest force behind actually learning something

Page 17: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Song and Play in Language Learning

• Study to see how physical activities (games and songs) affected language learning in children– Concluded that it had a positive impact– Seemed to create some kind of internal motivation– Can this method be applied to adults?

Page 18: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Alpine

• Higher education project to change the ways universities teach languages

• Discovered that most adults learn languages for purely intrinsic reasons– However parents want their kids to learn foreign languages

for extrinsic reasons

• High education should change perception of students to coincide with this

Page 19: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Children vs. Adults

• If motivation is high…• And adults use memory exercises…• And adults use pronunciation exercises…• There’s no reason why adults can’t learn a

language as easily as children (according to Alpine studies)

Page 20: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

The Big Problem

• The right type of motivation is often not present in adults

• “Social” motivation is determined to be the best type of motivation for language learning

• Should create educational frameworks that encourage this type of motivation, and provide opportunities for adults to practice memory and pronunciation

Page 21: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Agenda

• Introduction• Four perspectives of learning:

– Informal and formal learning– “Learning about” and “learning to be”– Exploration of different aspects of learning– Tools for learning vs tools for living

• Conclusion• Questions

Page 22: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Tools For Learning

• Provide a level of scaffolding fading– “enable the learner to do more than he or she

would alone” – Roy D. Pea

• Example: toddler walking toy• After fading the tool is no longer used by

person.– This leaves the tool very static in its role and

functionality

Page 23: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Tool for Living

• Based on Distributed Intelligence• Allow people to engage in activities they

would otherwise not participate in• Dependency Issues?

– The benefits of the tools usually outweigh the dependency cost.

• Extreme Case: wheel chairs for the elderly, seeing eye dogs for the blind

Page 24: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Language Tools for Learning

• Many software packages available• Previous problems with software

– recognition performance, pronunciation recognition

• Improvements in intonation and stress have improved these areas as well as syntactic and semantic intelligibility

Page 25: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Language Tools for Living

• German Project Verbmobil ~$165M Project• Bidirectional spontaneous language

translation English, German, and Japanese. • 2,500+ word vocabulary focused on business

travel• Play Video!

Page 26: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Summary

• Tools for living and tools for learning each have their domain

• Personal Ideas– The reliability of computer technologies reduces

many dependency issues– The development of tools for living should not be

viewed as a crutch but as an aid in making life easier or more effective.

Page 27: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Agenda

• Introduction• Four perspectives of learning:

– Informal and formal learning– “Learning about” and “learning to be”– Exploration of different aspects of learning– Tools for learning vs tools for living

• Conclusion• Questions

Page 28: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Motivation Patterns

Intrinsic Motivation Extrinsic Motivation

Formal learning

Learning about

Tools for living

Informal learning

Learning to be

Tools for learning

Social Motivation: Mixture of two types of motivation

Page 29: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Conclusion

• A person with social motivation would be more successful in learning a foreign language, because he/she can benefit from both types of learning (formal/informal, about/to be)

Page 30: Independent Research: Language Learning Johnathan Lansing Gary Knoll Laoleng Xiong Keisuke Nishimoto 2006 Design, Learning and Collaboration.

Questions?