Independence Along the Continuum: Differentiating and Empowering Student Learning Therese Dristas, Nettie Eichelberger, Myra Lolkema, Anastasia Trekles http://www.iceindiana.org Andrews, G. (2015). To boldly go where no learner has gone before: Independentinquiry, educationaltechnology, and society in science fiction. E-Learningand Digital Media, 12(3-4), 343-360. doi: 10.1177/2042753015571825 Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome). New York, NY: Academic Press. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University Press. Branch, L.J. (2014). The impact of project-based learning and technology on student achievement in mathematics. In (W.K. Ma, A.H. Yuen, J. Park, W.W. Lau, & L. Deng, Eds.) New Media, Knowledge, Practices, and Multiliteracies, 259-268. Springer Science and Business Media: Singapore. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school:Expanded edition. Washington, DC:National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php? isbn=0309070368 Chau, J., & Cheng, G. (2010). Towards understandingthe potential of e-portfolios for independent learning:A qualitativestudy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 932-950. Retrieved from http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M.M. (2014). How science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. Presenter background InternationalJournal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113. doi: 10. 1007/ s10763- 014-9526-0 Kuhn, D. , Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000) The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning, cognition and instruction, 18(4), 495-523. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_3 Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructionaldesign models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solvinglearningoutcomes. EducationalTechnology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02299613 Rafoth, M.A. (1999). Inspiring independent learning: Successful classroom strategies. Maryland:National EducationAssociation. Wing, J.M. (2008). Computational Thinkingand ThinkingAboutComputing.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366(1881), 3717-3725. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0118 Primary • Give students opportunity to explore and develop skills early on • Provide good rules and boundaries but be willing to let go of control! • Model – I do, we do, you do • Praise and encourage independence • Consider a ”Centers” classroom model Middle School • Students can now go further – allow them more time for independent problem-solving, critical thinking • Help students learn from and with peers through group collaboration High School • They may resist, but fostering independence is critical • Instill lifelong learning skills and habits – personal study style • Self-reflection, organizational skills, problem-solving all key to growth College • Students must move away from expecting to “be taught” to real learning • Planning and organizing is essential • Encourage students to adopt planners or calendars and set aside specific time for study • Use apps like Forest or Pattern to stay on task! The ability to find one's own path toward a learning goal; involves navigating complexities to find answers to problems without the intervention of a teacher (Chau & Cheng, 2010). • Organized • Persistent • Reads and understands instructions independently • Completes tasks without adult help • Uses (and evaluates) multiple sources to find information • Sets individual goals and strives to achieve them • Learns from failures From @doodle_ed Forest Kidspiration