Street Segment Analysis of Juvenile Crime Louis Tuthill, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Criminology Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminal Justice Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jan 01, 2016
Street Segment Analysis
of Juvenile Crime in Trenton
Louis Tuthill, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Criminology
Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminal Justice
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Table of Contents• Juvenile Crime vs. Adult Crime• Point Pattern Analysis• Street Segment Analysis• Juvenile Incidents in Trenton• Area 1• Area 2• Area 3• Area 4• Area 5
Juvenile Crime vs. Adult Crime• In studying Juvenile Crime we attempt to pick at risk
youth and address the “risk” and “protective” factors that impact individual youth• Effective programs are expensive and address cognitive and
behavioral change at the individual and familial level• Individual level information can also be used to assess
networks of juveniles engaged in criminal behavior
• Challenges with model:• Cost of treating individuals• Labeling youth as “criminal” or “at risk” can create other issues• Effective targeting of resources to address needs
Point Pattern Analysis• Takes all these points (kernel)
and maps them into positions based on the closeness of these incidents (KDE)• Measures the density or
closeness of the same criminal event• Provides cross-sectional
rendering of crime events• Rendering includes several
streets and statistical “white noise”
Street Segment Analysis• Maps event to the nearest street• Uses a density function LISA (Local Indicator of Spatial
Autocorrelation) • Provides a statistical measure of street segments where
crime cluster high• We then look to each individual street segment which are
separated by one segment. This gives us street segment clusters.• Then we can examine each of these street segments, based
on the crime and the physical environment, see what factors might be contributing to crime• We can also then measure the change in these cluster over
time
Incidents of Juvenile Arrests
January 2009 - May 2014
• Identified 126 Street Segments
• Segments make up 3.6% of Trenton's geographic space
• 48.7% all juvenile arrests occurred within one block of these areas
• 63.3% all juvenile arrests occurred within two blocks of these areas
Examined each set of street clusters
• Looked for interconnection of streets
• Examined if the event was acute or chronic (time and prevalence)
• Looked at crimes within one standard block (330 feet) of these street segments
• We will examine the crime typology and the discuss how to best address the crime
Area 1
12 13 14 15 16 170.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
1.4%2.7%
4.1%
20.3%
16.4%
55.2%
Area 1: Percent Of Offenders by Age
93%
7%
Percent of Offenders by Race
BlackWhite
11%
89%
Percent of Offenders by Sex
Female
Male
Area 1: Demographic Breakdown
0 0.125 0.6666666666666670
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Area 1: Percent of Arrests by Time of Day
1/2009 1/2009 3/2009 4/2009 6/2009 7/2009 9/200911/20091/2010 3/2010 5/2010 8/2010 2/2011 4/2011 5/2011 8/2011 2/2012 6/2012 3/2013 6/201312/20130
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Area 1: Percent of Juvenile Crime by Month and Year
Drugs
Other
Weapons
Disorderly Conduct
Curfew/Driving Violations/Truancy
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
26.9%
15.4%
7.4%
7.0%
6.6%
Area 1: Top Five Juvenile Arrests
Area 1• Predominantly drug use and related crimes• Mostly among Black males• Considerable uptick in activity between 8 and 11 pm• Significant jump in juvenile arrest in 2011 – seems to
have subsided• Late onset delinquency related to drug use
Area 2
BELLEVUE AVENUE
WEST STATE STREET
CA
LHO
UN
STR
EET
SPRING STREET
PR
OS
PE
CT
ST
RE
ET
PASSAIC STREET
WEST HANOVER STREET
PENNINGTON AVENUE
NO
RT
H W
ILL
OW
ST
RE
ET
RUTHERFORD AVENUE
CAPITAL STREET
PERRY STREET
CHURCH STREET
NO
RT
H B
RO
AD
ST
RE
ET
STATE OF NEW JERSEY ROUTE 29 SOUTH
NO
RT
H W
AR
RE
N S
TR
EE
T
COLE STREETW
AYNE AVENUEEDGEW
OOD AVENUE RESERVOIR STREET
FRAZIER STREET
OLIVE STREET
BLANE ALLEY
EAST STATE STREET
SWEETS AVENUE
MOSES ALLEY
BRUNSWIC
K AVENUE
WEST INGHAM AVENUE
TRENT STREET
MA
RT
IN L
UT
HE
R K
ING
JR
BO
UL
EV
AR
D
FIS
HE
R P
LAC
E
MA
RIO
N S
TREET
FOUNTAIN AVENUE
SEIGER ALLEY
EAST HANOVER STREET
ACADEMY STREET
RICHEY P
LACE
SUMMER STREET
NEW ROSE STREET
STUYVESANT AVENUE
BOND STREET
GILBERT ALLEY
BOUDINOT STREET
EXTO
N A
VEN
UE
ALLEN STREET
ENGLE ALLEY
AMBOY ALLEY
PASHLEY AVENUE
WE
ST
EN
D A
VE
NU
E
ARTISAN STREETW
EBB ALLEY
MEYER STREET
JARVIS PLACE
BA
RN
ES
ST
RE
ET
BE
LM
AR
AL
LE
Y
MONUMENT STREET
ENGLISH ALLEY
NEL
SON
STR
EET
12 13 14 15 16 170.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
0.5%
4.2%
12.0%
16.0%
20.1%
47.2%
Area 2: Percent Of Offenders by Age
95%
5%
Percent of Offenders by Race
BlackWhite
9%
91%
Percent of Offenders by Sex
Female
Male
Area 2: Demographic Breakdown
1 19 40 55 115 219 314 944 101911351232140014311459162317301831191320052017202820442055210621352208223022512303231523350
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Area 2: Percent of Arrests by Time of Day
1/2009 1/2010 6/20123/2009 5/2009 6/2009 8/2009 9/2009 11/2009 3/2010 7/2010 1/2011 5/2011 7/2011 1/2012 10/2013 1/20140
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Area 2: Percent of Juvenile Crime by Month and Year
1/2009 3/2009 5/2009 6/2009 8/2009 9/2009 11/2009 1/2010 3/2010 7/2010 1/2011 5/2011 7/2011 1/2012 6/2012 10/2013 1/20140
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Percent of Juvenile Crime by Month and YearComparison of Areas 1 & 2
Drugs
Other
Weapons
Disorderly Conduct
Stolen Property
Curfew/Driving Violations/Truancy
Burglary
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
26.4%
19.4%
8.6%
6.0%
5.3%
4.9%
4.4%
Area 2: Top Five Juvenile Arrests
Area 2• Predominantly drug related offenses
• More variety in type of criminal activity
• Mostly black males• Both time lines show general increase in juvenile crimes in 2011
– drop off beginning June 2012• It appears that efforts in Area 1 pushed delinquency into Area 2• We need more data to see if crime in Area 2 was disbursed or moved
• Different timeline than Area• Morning crimes• Afternoon crime (related to property crimes)• Evening crimes (related to drug markets)
• Late onset delinquency related to drug use
Area 3
12 13 14 15 16 170
10
20
30
40
50
60
1.42.7
4.1
20.3
16.4
55.2
Area 3: Percent Of Offenders by Age
91%
2% 7%
Percent of Offenders by Race
BlackOtherWhite
16%
84%
Percent of Offenders by Sex
Female
Male
Area 3: Demographic Breakdown
1 21 30 42 55 121 139 159 423 927 1054 1129 1232 1423 1531 1754 1837 2007 2026 2044 2103 2143 2206 2219 2235 2305 2320 23480
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Area 3: Percent of Arrests by Time of Day
1/20
09
2/20
09
2/20
09
3/20
09
4/20
09
5/20
09
6/20
09
7/20
09
7/20
09
8/20
09
9/20
09
9/20
09
10/2
009
11/2
009
12/2
009
1/20
10
2/20
10
2/20
10
2/20
10
3/20
10
3/20
10
5/20
10
8/20
10
10/2
010
11/2
010
12/2
010
1/20
11
5/20
11
6/20
11
6/20
11
11/2
011
12/2
011
12/2
011
3/20
12
6/20
12
8/20
12
8/20
12
11/2
012
1/20
13
8/20
13
11/2
013
5/20
140
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Area 3: Percent of Juvenile Crime by Month and Year
Drugs
Other
Disorderly Conduct
Weapons
Burglary
Stolen Property
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0%
33.1%
13.5%
10.2%
6.2%
3.6%
3.6%
Area 3: Top Five Juvenile Arrests
Area 3• Predominantly drug related activity
• Other crimes: weapons, burglary, & stolen property • Related to the drug market• Related to need to generate incomes
• Mostly black males• Uptick in criminal activity in early afternoon and evening• Different time of year pattern from Areas 1 and 2
• Important to note differences in time of day and time of year for resource allocation purposes
• Late onset delinquency
Area 4
10 12 13 14 15 16 170.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
0.2%
2.7%4.2%
9.5%
14.2%
21.2%
48.0%
Area 4: Percent Of Offenders by Age
87%
13%
Percent of Offenders by Race
BlackWhite
16%
84%
Percent of Offenders by Sex
Female
Male
Area 4: Demographic Breakdown
8 100 155 236 330 603 856 1000 1100 1135 1230 1307 1355 1436 1506 1533 1603 1700 1816 1911 2000 2034 2137 2207 2225 2243 23160
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Area 4: Percent of Arrests by Time of Day
1/2009 2/2009 3/2009 5/2009 7/2009 10/2009 10/2009 1/2010 2/2010 3/2010 7/2010 10/2010 1/2011 4/2011 10/2011 3/2012 1/2013 8/20130
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Area 4: Percent of Juvenile Crime by Month and Year
Weapons
Other
Drugs
Disorderly Conduct
Robbery
0 5 10 15 20 25
20.4
15
11.9
10.8
7.7
Area 4: Top Five Juvenile Arrests
Area 4• Predominantly drug related activity• More violent area – chief illicit commodity appears to
be weapons• First case of robbery in Area 4
• Mostly among black males• Most activities occurred in the evening• Late onset of delinquency
Area 5
10 12 13 14 15 16 170.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
2.5%4.4%
5.7%
8.9%7.0%
23.4%
48.1%
Area 5: Percent Of Offenders by Age
72%
28%
Percent of Offenders by Race
Black
White
6%
94%
Percent of Offenders by Sex
Female
Male
Area 5: Demographic Breakdown
0 13 41 136
229
500
953
1011
1137
1223
1303
1401
1420
1515
1659
1756
1805
1826
1910
1925
2013
2056
2149
2212
2308
2323
2329
2339
2345
2351
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Area 5: Percent of Arrests by Time of Day
1/20
09
3/20
09
4/20
09
6/20
09
7/20
09
8/20
09
9/20
09
9/20
09
1/20
10
3/20
10
4/20
10
5/20
10
6/20
10
6/20
10
10/2
010
12/2
010
4/20
11
6/20
11
11/2
011
1/20
12
2/20
12
4/20
12
7/20
12
11/2
012
10/2
013
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Area 5: Percent of Juvenile Crime by Month and Year
Drugs
Weapons
Disorderly Conduct
Other
Arson
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
21.5%
13.9%
12.0%
8.9%
5.7%
Area 5: Top Five Juvenile Arrests
Area 5• Predominantly drug use and related crimes• Mostly among black males• Stable drug market• Activity occurred throughout the day• Late onset delinquency
Overall analysis• Overall it appears that the serious juvenile crime is
spurred by drug markets• This began in 2009 and has moved around the city in an
overall upward swing• It appears that older juveniles are being incorporated into
current drug markets • Older juveniles appear to be used to transport illicit merchandise
• Juveniles are also arming themselves for protection• Juveniles appear to be reacting effectively to law
enforcement responses by moving around the city
Overall analysis• Arrest of this population has been found to be the worst
response• Most of the factors with regard to late onset have much
more to do with peer-group, labeling, and family dynamics• If we are going to intervene we need to do it in late-middle
or early-high school• We need consistent effort target at this population because
we are generally competing with the gangs• From the Trenton adult data this age becomes the launching
point where individuals begin to engage in more serious crime
Louis Tuthill, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Criminology
Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminal Justice
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey