In this report: Air Pollution Control Issue 50 • July 30, 2013 • Technologies and Applications • Vendors and Products • Policies and Regulations • Q&A with Owens Corning Photo: ©iStockphoto.com/afhunta
In this report: Air Pollution Control
Issue 50 • July 30, 2013
• Technologies and Applications
• Vendors and Products
• Policies and Regulations
• Q&A with Owens Corning
Photo: ©iStockphoto.com/afhunta
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
2
EL Insights: Air Pollution Control
Air Pollution Control at a Glance
Air emissions control is a crucial part of sustainability for companies in many industries. Firms are
obligated under law to restrict emissions of a variety of substances, with regulations varying widely by
sector and country; but some of the most commonly regulated emissions include carbon monoxide,
nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, lead, particulates, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ammonia, mercury,
metals and hydrogen chloride – and also ozone, which companies don’t emit directly, but which forms
from gases they do emit.
This issue of EL Insights will look at what companies from a variety of sectors can do to reduce their
emissions of airborne pollutants, and at the state of the emissions control industry. Since we have
covered and continue to address carbon dioxide emissions from a variety of angles, this report will avoid
discussing carbon reductions, but we will address several other greenhouse gases.
Technologies and Applications
Source and process control
Perhaps the most effective way to prevent air pollution is at the source, reducing the amount of pollutants
created by a particular process – rather than simply capturing or treating the resultant pollutants. Often
companies must use emissions control technology as well, but source reductions are a good place to
start. Such reductions fall into a few basic categories:
Reducing the amount of fuel used
Minimizing waste generation, or reusing byproducts
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
3
Reducing the amount of raw materials used1
Making material substitutions: For example, companies can use non- or low-VOC solvents and
coatings to help reduce ozone creation.2
Maintenance: For example, by keeping combustion equipment properly maintained, companies
can avoid using excess fuel. In chemical reactions, they can improve parameters such as
temperature and mixing to reduce the amount of raw materials consumed and waste generated.3
Engineers can help reduce nitrogen oxide formation from furnaces by changing the flame
temperature, the time air remains in the combustion change, or the mixing rate of fuel and air.4
Emissions control equipment
Companies choose their control technology based on the type of pollutant, stationary source conditions,
and control efficiency needed.5 Pollutant profiles vary considerably by industry, and certain types of
control equipment therefore tend to be used by certain sectors. For example, the biggest industrial
emitters of VOCs are petroleum and related industries, solvent utilization, and storage & transportation
(see chart, p.5).
1 CED Engineering, Selecting the Best Air Pollution Control Strategy.
http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdf
2 http://www.cleanairworld.org/TopicDetails.asp?parent=7
3 CED Engineering, Selecting the Best Air Pollution Control Strategy.
http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdf
4http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
5 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdfhttp://www.cleanairworld.org/TopicDetails.asp?parent=7http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdfhttp://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspxhttp://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
4
Some of the most common types of air pollution control equipment are:
Bag houses/fabric filters: These devices feature filter bags, made from any number of materials
(including paper, cotton, Nomex, polyester, fiberglass, Teflon, and spun stainless steels), hanging in a
sturdy “house.” The bags remove particulate matter found in smoke, vapors, dust or mists. Particles stay
on the filter and eventually form a dust cake that is disposed of or re-used in industrial processes. Fabric
filters can collect over 99.9 percent of entering particulates, including fine particles, but bag and house
wear can reduce their efficiency. The dust cake must be removed carefully to prevent airborne releases.6
Some companies have equipped bag houses with catalytic bags, so the devices can perform two types of
pollution control at the same time. Fabric filters and bag houses are used at asphalt batch plants,
concrete batch kilns, steel mills, foundries and fertilizer plants, among other facilities.7
Scrubbers/wet collectors: This type of control device either passes a gas stream through liquid (usually
water), or sprays the liquid onto the gas stream. The sprays may contain chemicals to help the water
absorb gases. Scrubbers can also remove particles. For particles, wet scrubbers can have removal
efficiencies of up to 99 percent, but for very small particles their efficiency can be much lower. In general,
they are better than cyclones (see below) at removing particles, but unless they are operated at high
power, they are not as effective as bag houses or electrostatic precipitators.
Scrubbers can handle high-temperature gases and don’t suffer from the fire and explosion hazards of
some dry collection systems. Absorption can be used to recover products, and scrubbers are useful for
gas streams with high concentrations of water-soluble compounds. However, they create dirty water
which must itself be cleaned, often using settling ponds and sludge handlers. The high-humidity air these
devices release can cause local meteorological problems and driving hazards.
6http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
7 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspxhttp://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
5
Industrial fuel
combustion
Chemical &
allied product
manufacturing
Metals
processing
Petroleum &
related
industries
Solvent
utilization
Storage &
transportation
Waste disposal
& recycling
Other industrial
processes
Ammonia 13 19 2 1 0 5 67 56
VOCs 107 88 37 1,742 3,298 1,193 185 362
Sulfur dioxide 1,069 185 177 149 1 6 21 253
PM2.5 92 12 24 11 1 13 181 187
PM10 142 18 42 16 1 41 220 907
Nitrogen oxides 1,391 55 79 425 6 10 97 416
Carbon monoxide 894 183 840 262 7 18 1,378 426
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
US Emissions from Industrial Fuel Combustion and Processes, 2012,
by Industry/Process and Pollutant (thousand tons)
Note: PM10 and PM2.5 data does not include condensibles. Source: EPA National Emissions Inventory
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
6
Scrubbers are common at asphalt and concrete batch plants, coal-burning power plants, and other
facilities that emit sulfur oxides, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen chloride and ammonia.8,9
Adsorbers: These devices use sponge-like porous materials, such as activated carbon, silica gel and
alumina oxide, to soak up gases. Once the adsorbent material is saturated, it must be either refreshed or
disposed of. Companies often use activated carbon to control VOCs, solvents, toxic gases and gasoline
vapors, as well as odors. If the gases contain particulates, however, the adsorbents can become clogged.
Adsorbers are often used at soil remediation facilities, oil refineries, paint shops, steel mills and
wastewater treatment plants. Popular uses also include degreasing, rubber processing and printing
operations.10, 11
Cyclones: These devices spin dirty air in increasingly tighter circles, using centrifugal force to cause large
particles to move toward the outside wall, where they bounce off and fall to the bottom for collection.
Cyclones can remove either solid particles or liquid droplets. They can achieve efficiencies greater than
90 percent for particle sizes of 10 μm or greater. Groups of cyclones called multi-cyclones, meanwhile,
are better at removing fine particulate matter. Companies often use cyclones as a pre-treatment, before
more expensive equipment such as bag houses or electrostatic precipitators remove smaller particles.
Cyclones have a low capital and operating cost, and can withstand acids, high heat and pressure. But
they can get clogged or worn out from sticky, hard or sharp particles.12 Particles can also recirculate from
8 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
9http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
10 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
11http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
12Ibid.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdfhttp://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspxhttp://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdfhttp://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
7
the hopper, and heavy dust at the cyclone inlet can plug the hopper. Cyclones are widely used at cotton
gins, rock crushers, woodworking shops, cement plans, pharmaceutical makers, grain elevators, feed
mills and other industrial processes that produce gas streams with relatively large particulates.
Vapor condensers: These devices cool gaseous vapors, turning them into liquid. Companies often use
them as pre-cleaners to remove gas vapors before sending exhaust air to more expensive equipment
such as incinerators or absorbers. The liquefied gases can also be reused, helping to cut costs. For
example, dry cleaners often use condensers to return solvents to use.13
Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs): These devices use high voltage electrodes to negatively charge
airborne particles of between 0.1 and 10 microns, which then collect on a metal surface to form a dust
cake. A “rapper” strikes the plate periodically to drop the dust cake into a collection hopper. Companies
can also configure ESPs as a series of collecting plates to improve overall efficiencies. ESPs are capable
of efficiencies over 99 percent. They are generally better at collecting fine particles than scrubbers or
cyclones, and they can handle hot gases from 350 to 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit. This makes them ideal
for use at Portland cement plants, steel furnaces, and industrial boilers.14 ESPs are used in many of the
same sectors as bag houses, including power plants, paper mills, smelters and petroleum refineries.15
Flares: Industrial plants use combustion to dispose of intermittent or emergency releases of certain
emissions, such as hydrocarbons, chlorine, fluorine and particulate matter. Refineries and chemical plants
often use flaring as well, as do large commercial printing facilities. The process is designed to destroy
substances with a minimum amount of smoke.16
13Ibid.
14Ibid.
15 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
16http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdfhttp://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
8
Thermal oxidizers: Incinerators that do not burn solids are called thermal oxidizers. They are used to
destroy odorous or toxic VOCs, and can achieve efficiencies of 99.99 percent. But reaching the needed
temperatures (up to 2000°F) requires a lot of fuel, so costs can be high. Regenerative thermal oxidizers
capture and reuse heat, achieving heat recoveries of up to 95 percent, which cuts fuel costs
considerably.17
Catalytic reactors/selective catalytic reduction (SCR): SCR systems are used frequently to control
NOx from the burning of fossil fuels. In these systems, ammonia and NOx react to form nitrogen and
water. SCR can remove more than 90 percent of NOx. Catalytic reactors can also be used for other gases
and VOCs.18 These devices have much lower energy and operating costs than incinerators. They are
commonly used at landfills, oil refineries, printing companies and paint shops.19 However, particulate
matter can coat the catalyst surface, and certain chemicals can deactivate the catalyst.20
Biofilters: These destroy VOCs, hydrogen sulfide, organic sulfides and odors through microbial oxidation.
The polluted air passes through a wet bed, which supports bacteria that absorb and metabolize the
pollutants. Biofilters can achieve efficiencies over 98 percent. They are commonly used at wastewater
treatment plants as well as in industrial processes.21
17 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
18http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
19 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
20http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspx
21 Air and Waste Management Association, Fact Sheet: Air Pollution Emission Control Devices for Stationary Sources.
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
http://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdfhttp://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspxhttp://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdfhttp://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/AirQuality/HowAirPollutionIsControlled.aspxhttp://events.awma.org/files_original/ControlDevicesFactSheet07.pdf
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
9
Vendors and Products
The EPA’s Air Pollution Control Technology Center has verified technologies in several pollution control
categories. These products and technologies are:
Baghouse filtration
Donaldson Company: Dura-Life #0701607 Filtration Media, Tetratex #6262 Filtration Media, Tetratex
#6277 Filtration Media, Tetratex #6282 Filtration Media
Sinoma Science & Technology Co.: FT-806 Filtration Media, FT-902 Filtration Media
TTG Inc.: TG100 Filtration Media, TG800 Filtration Media
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.: 5117 High Durability PPS Laminate Filtration Media
Nitrogen Oxide (NO x) Control Technologies for Stationary Sources
Catalytica Energy Systems, Inc.: Xonon Flameless Combustion System22
Other companies in the air pollution control market include the following (many of these are listed in the
buyers’ guide run by the Institute of Clean Air Companies):23
ADA Carbon Solutions (www.ada-cs.com): Provides activated carbon products for mercury capture from
flue gas streams.
22 http://www.epa.gov/etv/vt-apc.html
23 http://www.icac.com/search/newsearch.asp
http://www.ada-cs.com/http://www.epa.gov/etv/vt-apc.htmlhttp://www.icac.com/search/newsearch.asp
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
10
Anguil Environmental Systems (http://www.anguil.com): Offers thermal and catalytic oxidizers to control
VOCs, hazardous air pollutants, process odors and nitrous oxides.
Cabot Norit Activated Carbon (www.norit.com): Offers mercury and odor control products.
Calgon Carbon Corporation (www.calgoncarbon.com): Offers activated carbon injection, continuous
emissions and opacity monitoring systems.
California Analytical Instruments (www.gasanalyzers.com): Offers gas analyzer products and systems.
Clyde Bergemann Power Group Americas - Air Pollution Control Product Division (www.us.cbpg.com):
Offers electrostatic precipitators, fabric filter systems, flue-gas desulfurization and dry scrubbing systems,
dry sorbent storage and injection and mercury control systems.
Cormetech (www.Cormetech.com): Offers SCR catalysts.
CRI/Criterion (www.cricatalyst.com; www.criterioncatalysts.com): CRI/Criterion is the catalyst technology
company of the Shell Group. It provides SCR technology for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and catalysts for the
oxidation of VOCs and carbon monoxide.
Durag (www.durag.com): Makes environmental measurement products addressing dust concentration
and opacity, mercury concentration and flue gas volume flow.
Durr Systems, Environ. & Energy Systems (www.durr-cleantechnology.com): Offers absorption,
adsorption, catalytic oxidation and thermal oxidation products.
http://www.anguil.com/http://www.norit.com/http://www.calgoncarbon-us.com/http://www.gasanalyzers.com/http://www.us.cbpg.com/http://www.cormetech.com/http://www.cricatalyst.com/http://www.criterioncatalysts.com/http://www.durag.com/http://www.durr-cleantechnology.com/
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
11
Envirogen Technologies (www.envirogen.com): The company has launched a product using both
biological and adsorption technologies to address VOCs, hazardous air pollutants and odors. It says initial
applications for the product will be in refinery and chemical facilities.24
Environmental Systems Corporation (www.envirosys.com): Offers emissions monitoring software and
data controllers.
FMC Corporation (http://environmental.fmc.com/solutions/air-pollution-control): Offers technologies for
SOx and NOx abatement, particularly for fossil fired-generation plants.
Fuel Tech (www.ftek.com): Provides multi-pollutant emission control and advanced combustion
technologies, including customized NOx control systems and proprietary urea-to-ammonia conversion
technology, which can provide safe reagent for use in selective catalytic reduction systems.
Haldor Topsoe (www.topsoe.com): Offers pollution control, including SCR systems, for removal of
nitrogen oxides, sulfurous compounds, carbon monoxide and VOCs.
Herr Industrial (http://www.herrindustrial.com/APC_overview.html): Specializes in the control of VOCs
and particulates, focusing on the printing, flexographic, wood finishing, metal coating, painting and
OSB/MDF mill industries. Offers dust collectors, bag houses and wet and dry electrostatic precipitators.
Hitachi Power Systems America (www.hitachi.com): Offers SCR systems, NOx catalysts, dry scrubbers,
low-NOx burners, fabric filters and flue gas desulfurization.
Lechler (http://tinyurl.com/n3dtfba): Sells nozzles, lances and systems used in semi dry flue-gas
desulphurization, wet flue-gas desulphurization, SCR and SNCR.
MKS Instruments (www.mksinst.com): Offers air and gas analysis products.
24 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/05/20/envirogen-launches-emissions-control-technologies/
http://www.envirogen.com/http://www.envirosys.com/http://environmental.fmc.com/solutions/air-pollution-controlhttp://www.ftek.com/http://www.topsoe.com/http://www.herrindustrial.com/APC_overview.htmlhttp://www.hitachi.com/http://tinyurl.com/n3dtfbahttp://www.mksinst.com/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/05/20/envirogen-launches-emissions-control-technologies/
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
12
Novinda (www.novinda.com): Offers a reagent for mercury emissions control.
Tiger Optics LLC (www.tigeroptics.com): Manufactures trace gas analyzers and ambient air monitors.
URS Corporation (http://www.urscorp.com/Markets/index.php?s=10): Offers coal-fired power plants
technologies to reduce sulfur dioxide, sulfur trioxide, mercury and other particulates, including flue gas
desulfurization systems, through its Advatech joint venture with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI). URS
also provides sodium bisulphite injection technology that reduces sulfur trioxide emissions.
Benefits and Challenges
Benefits
Compliance: Much pollution control is driven by the need to comply with regulations and avoid penalties.
See Policies, below, for more information.
Slowing climate change: Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxides are greenhouse gases, which cause climate
change, and direct industrial emissions accounted for about 20 percent of total US greenhouse gases in
2011. If indirect emissions from industry’s electricity use are included, industry’s share goes up to 28
percent, making it the biggest contributor of greenhouse gases.25
A recent study concluded that black carbon – a common component of particulate matter – is the second
largest man-made contributor to global warming, with a per-square meter warming effect about two-thirds
that of carbon dioxide.26
25 http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/sources/industry.html
26 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/01/17/soot-is-second-largest-human-influence-on-climate-change/
http://www.novinda.com/http://www.tigeroptics.com/http://www.urscorp.com/Markets/index.php?s=10http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/sources/industry.htmlhttp://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/01/17/soot-is-second-largest-human-influence-on-climate-change/
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
13
Improving health: Many of the emissions also directly affect health, especially that of children, the elderly
and those suffering from respiratory ailments. Particulates can decrease lung function even in healthy
people, and studies estimate that thousands of elderly people die prematurely each year from exposure to
fine particles.27 Exposure to ozone causes coughing, wheezing and throat irritation.28 The 188 substances
classed as hazardous air pollutants (see Policies, below) are known or suspected to cause serious health
effects including cancer, reproductive problems and birth defects.29
Visibility: Ozone is the main component in smog, and wind can transport ozone long distances.
Companies don’t emit ozone directly, but emit its components, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs).30
Plant and animal life: Many types of emissions have harmful effects on crops and other vegetation, on
ecosystems and on animals.
Cost savings: Process changes aimed at reducing emissions can also save companies money, by
reducing purchases of raw materials and fuels, for example.31
27 http://www.epa.gov/pm/fastfacts.html
28 http://www.epa.gov/apti/ozonehealth/population.html#acute
29 http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/aqmportal/pollutant_types.htm
30 http://www.epa.gov/glo/basic.html
31 CED Engineering, Selecting the Best Air Pollution Control Strategy.
http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdf
http://www.epa.gov/pm/fastfacts.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/apti/ozonehealth/population.html#acutehttp://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/aqmportal/pollutant_types.htmhttp://www.epa.gov/glo/basic.htmlhttp://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdf
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
14
Challenges
Costs: It is difficult to generalize about the costs of industrial air pollution controls. For a start, costs vary
widely by type of equipment – for example, bag houses and electrostatic precipitators tend to be more
expensive than cyclones; incinerators and adsorbers are usually more expensive than vapor condensers.
Thermal oxidizers tend to be expensive because of their fuel use, but the addition of catalysts can reduce
these costs32, as can advanced systems with high heat recoveries. The operating costs of various thermal
and catalytic oxidizers varies from $0.30 to $28.37 an hour at a 1 percent lower explosive limit (a measure
of the flammability of gas).33 The EPA has estimated capital costs for wet electrostatic precipitators in the
range of $300,000 to $450,000, depending on saturated volume and efficiency, though the estimates date
from 1999.34
The EPA and industry often publish wildly different estimates of regulation’s costs to business. Power
companies have said they cannot bear the costs of new equipment to comply with the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule, estimated at $800 million annually from 2014.35 Meanwhile a study by National Economic
Research Associates on behalf of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity analyzed seven EPA
regulations that affect coal-fueled electricity generation, including Mercury and Air Toxics Standards,
regional haze, national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone, SO2 NAAQS, PL 2.5 NAAQS,
316(b) and coal combustion residuals, and found that compliance costs for the electric sector could total
between $198 billion and $220 billion from 2013 to 2034.36
32 CED Engineering, Selecting the Best Air Pollution Control Strategy.
http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdf
33 Gene Anguil of Anguil Environmental Systems, Emission Control Technology. Updated chapter, originally from Odor and VOC Control
Handbook, Harold J. Rafson, Ed. http://www.anguil.com/resources/overview-of-emission-control-technologies.aspx
34 http://www.epa.gov/ttn/catc/dir1/cs6ch3.pdf
35 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/06/25/supreme-court-to-judge-smog-rule/
36 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/10/30/epa-rules-would-cost-1-5-million-jobs-industry-group-says/
http://www.cedengineering.com/upload/Selection%20APC%20Strategy.pdfhttp://www.anguil.com/resources/overview-of-emission-control-technologies.aspxhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/catc/dir1/cs6ch3.pdfhttp://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/06/25/supreme-court-to-judge-smog-rule/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/10/30/epa-rules-would-cost-1-5-million-jobs-industry-group-says/
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
15
Regulations: Much of air pollution control is driven by regulations, and the EPA is constantly reviewing
and revising rules relating to air emissions. Companies must make sure that they stay up-to-date with
actual and potential changes to avoid committing violations.
Disposal: Many types of emission control require careful cleaning and disposal to ensure that the
pollutants don’t inadvertently enter the air or water.
Policies and Regulations
Industrial air pollutants are subject to a number of regulations in the US, as well as in other countries, and
regulation is a key driver of pollution control adoption. Here we will focus on the major US regulations.
This list is not exhaustive but touches on the major focus points of US regulations.
The EPA divides regulated pollutants into two categories: criteria pollutants and hazardous air pollutants.
Criteria pollutants - NAAQSs
The Clean Air Act, last amended in 1990, requires the EPA to set National Ambient Air Quality Standards
for pollutants considered harmful to the environment and public health. These fall into two categories:
primary standards are designed to provide public health protection, while secondary standards are
designed to provide public welfare protection, which includes protections for visibility, animals, crops,
other vegetation and buildings.
The EPA has set NAAQSs for six principal pollutants, called “criteria” pollutants. The standards are as
follows:
(Units of measure are either parts per million (ppm) by volume, parts per billion (ppb) by volume, or
micrograms per cubic meter of air (µg/m3).)
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
16
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
PM2.5 -2.5 -6.0 -9.1 -12. -4.9 -14. -11. -20. -27. -26.
Ozone -5.8 -7.3 0.9 -6.8 -7.8 -9.6 -5.3 3.9 -11. -11. -10. -16. -14. -14. -10. -15. -16. -11. -12. -18. -17. -12. -18. -25. -20. -21. -21. -25. -30. -27.
PM10 -2.6 -12. -14. -16. -17. -23. -22. -25. -18. -22. -23. -23. -22. -33. -28. -29. -26. -31. -38. -38.
Nitrogen dioxide -1.6 -5.3 -7.9 -5.4 -5.9 -5.5 -7.2 -5.0 -7.8 -12. -12. -16. -18. -14. -17. -19. -23. -23. -21. -26. -26. -29. -32. -37. -38. -41. -43. -46. -50. -52.
Sulfur dioxide -4.4 -14. -18. -16. -20. -23. -25. -22. -25. -29. -30. -35. -35. -37. -49. -50. -51. -52. -55. -56. -59. -62. -63. -64. -63. -67. -69. -73. -78. -79.
Carbon monoxide -0.9 -6.3 -5.1 -10. -15. -13. -22. -23. -22. -29. -32. -37. -40. -39. -45. -48. -52. -55. -54. -60. -62. -67. -69. -71. -73. -75. -77. -80. -81. -82.
Lead 7.0 -1.3 -2.8 -13. -14. -43. -43. -28. -57. -60. -65. -72. -75. -67. -73. -70. -78. -80. -79. -79. -64. -83. -86. -79. -85. -87. -84. -81. -83. -89.
-110
-90
-70
-50
-30
-10
10
US Air Quality, Changes from Baseline
1981-2010 (%)
PM2.5 Ozone PM10 Nitrogen dioxide Sulfur dioxide Carbon monoxide Lead
Source: Calculations by EL PRO, from EPA data (http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/)
Note: 1980 baseline used for most pollutants. Exceptions are PM10 (1990 baseline) and PM2.5 (2000 baseline), due to lack of data for earlier years. Changes calculated using mean measurements for each pollutant, based on 81 to 646 sites per pollutant. The EPA gives SO2 and NO2 measurements in ppb; CO and O3 in ppm; lead and PM in micrograms per cubic meter.
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
17
Carbon monoxide: Primary standards only: 9 ppm measured over 8 hours, and 35 ppm measured over 1
hour. These standards may not be exceeded more than once per year.37 In August 2011 the EPA issued
a decision to retain these standards, although it made some changes to monitoring requirements.38, 39
Lead: For primary and secondary standards: rolling 3-month average, 0.15 μg/m3. These standards may
not be exceeded.40 EPA issued findings that seven states missed Clean Air Act deadlines for submitting
plans, or elements of plans, for implementing EPA's 2008 national air quality standards for lead.41
In June 2013, the EPA issued a final rule establishing a new Federal Reference Method for state and
local air monitoring agencies to use as one of the approved methods for measuring lead in total
suspended particulate matter.42
Nitrogen dioxide: Primary standard: 1-hour, 100 ppb; 98th percentile, averaged over 3 years. Primary
and secondary: annual, 53 ppb; actual mean.43
37 http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
38 http://www.epa.gov/airquality/carbonmonoxide/actions.html
39 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/16/epa-resists-calls-to-strengthen-co-standard/
40 http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
41 http://www.epa.gov/airquality/lead/kitrules.html
42 http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/lead/actions.html
43 http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/airquality/carbonmonoxide/actions.htmlhttp://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/16/epa-resists-calls-to-strengthen-co-standard/http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/airquality/lead/kitrules.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/lead/actions.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
18
Sulfur dioxide: Primary: 1-hour, 75 ppb; 99th percentile of 1-hour daily maximum concentrations,
averaged over 3 years. Secondary: 3-hour, 0.5 ppm; not to be exceeded more than once per year.44
Ozone: Primary and secondary standard: 8-hour, 0.075 ppm.45 The Obama administration proposed in
January 2010 to tighten the 8-hour primary standard to a level in the range of 0.06-0.07 ppm, and to
establish a seasonal secondary standard in the range of 7-15 ppm-hours.46 But businesses and
Republicans in Congress objected over economic concerns, and in September 2011 the White
House shelved the plans.47 On July 23, 2013, a federal court rejected arguments that the current primary
standard is either too weak or too strong, but said the EPA would have to reconsider the secondary
standard for the pollutant48 – a review that was already underway.
On May 29, 2013, the EPA published a draft rule to address implementation requirements for the ozone
standard, proposing several approaches. The EPA says the proposed rule would provide states with
flexibility and help in meeting their Clean Air Act requirements.49
Particle pollution, PM2.5: For primary standards: annual, 12 μg/m3, annual mean, averaged over 3 years.
For secondary standards: annual, 15 μg/m3, annual mean, averaged over 3 years. For primary and
secondary standards: 24-hour, 35 μg/m3, 98th percentile, averaged over 3 years.50
44 Ibid.
45 Ibid.
46 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/07/epa-puts-science-behind-new-smog-standards/
47 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/02/obama-axes-ozone-rule-revamp/
48 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/07/24/has-ozone-found-its-goldilocks-zone/
49http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/pdfs/Implementation%20Fact%20Sheet%20draft%205-29-13.pdf
http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.htmlhttp://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/01/07/epa-puts-science-behind-new-smog-standards/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/02/obama-axes-ozone-rule-revamp/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/07/24/has-ozone-found-its-goldilocks-zone/http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/pdfs/Implementation%20Fact%20Sheet%20draft%205-29-13.pdf
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
19
In December 2012, the EPA strengthened the NAAQS for PM2.5 to 12 µg/m3, down from 15 µg/m3 set in
1997.51 On January 4, 2013, the DC Circuit Court issued a decision finding fault with how the EPA issued
rules for PM2.5, but the EPA says this decision does not affect its strengthening of the standard.52
Particle pollution, PM10: The standard for primary and secondary, in place since 1997, is 150 μg/m3 over
24 hours, not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over 3 years.53 In its December 2012
rulemaking, the EPA retained the existing standards for PM10.54
Other rules on criteria pollutants
Cross State Air-Pollution Rule: The EPA finalized this rule, on pollutants that cross state lines, in July
2011.55 But an appeals court declared the rule invalid in August 2012,56 following a challenge by 16 states
and a number of power companies, and the administration is now waiting for the Supreme Court to hear
the case.57
50 http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
51 http://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsoverview.pdf
52 http://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2013/20130104dcdecision.pdf
53 http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.html
54 http://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsoverview.pdf
55 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/07/07/epa-unveils-clean-air-transport-rule/
56 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/08/22/court-overturns-cross-state-air-pollution-rule/
57 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/06/25/supreme-court-to-judge-smog-rule/
http://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsoverview.pdfhttp://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2013/20130104dcdecision.pdfhttp://www.epa.gov/air/criteria.htmlhttp://www.epa.gov/airquality/particlepollution/2012/decfsoverview.pdfhttp://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/07/07/epa-unveils-clean-air-transport-rule/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/08/22/court-overturns-cross-state-air-pollution-rule/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/06/25/supreme-court-to-judge-smog-rule/
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
20
The rule sets limits on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from coal-fired plants in 28 states.
When introducing the rule, the EPA estimated that the regulations would prevent up to 34,000 premature
deaths. But power companies said they could not meet the EPA’s timeframe, or bear new equipment
costs estimated at $800 million annually from 2014.
Hazardous air pollutants
The EPA is working to reduce releases of 188 pollutants classed as HAPs. These pollutants are known or
suspected to cause cancer, other serious health effects (such as reproductive problems or birth defects)
or negative environmental effects.
Examples include dioxins, asbestos, toluene, cadmium, mercury, chromium, lead compounds, benzene,
perchlorethlyene and methylene chloride.58 EPA regulations cover over 80 categories of major industrial
sources, such as chemical plants, oil refineries, aerospace manufacturers, and steel mills, as well as
categories of smaller sources, such as dry cleaners, commercial sterilizers, secondary lead smelters, and
chromium electroplating facilities. It projects that these standards will cut annual air toxics emissions by
about 1.5 million tons.59
The EPA has established national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAPS) requiring
the use of maximum achievable control technology (MACT) for a number of industries. 60
Mercury and Air Toxics Standards: Finalized in April 2013, these are the first federal standards
requiring power plants to limit their emissions of toxic air pollutants like mercury, arsenic and metals.61
58 http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/aqmportal/pollutant_types.htm
59 http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/allabout.html
60 http://www.cleanairworld.org/TopicDetails.asp?parent=7
http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/aqmportal/pollutant_types.htmhttp://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/allabout.htmlhttp://www.cleanairworld.org/TopicDetails.asp?parent=7
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
21
The rules apply to coal- and oil-fired plants. The rule sets mercury emissions at 0.003 pound/GWh. For
new coal-fired plants, the agency sets the standard for filterable particulate matter emissions at 0.09
pound/MWh, hydrogen chloride at 0.01 pound/MWh, sulfur dioxide at 1.0 pound/MWh and lead at 0.02
pound/GWh.62
Toxics Release Inventory: This EPA program tracks the management of over 650 toxic chemicals, most
of which cause cancer or other chronic human health effects; significant acute human health effects; or
significant environmental effects. Facilities that manufacture, process or otherwise use these chemicals in
amounts above established levels must submit annual TRI reports indicating how much of each chemical
is released and how much is managed through recycling, energy recovery and treatment.63 Companies
must report if: they are in a specific industry sector, such as manufacturing, mining or electric power
generation; have 10 or more full-time employees; and either a) manufacture or process more than 25,000
lbs. of a TRI-listed chemical per year or b) use more than 10,000 lb. of a listed chemical in a year.64
Cross-cutting regulations
The EPA has also issued rules that govern both criteria and hazardous air pollutants, within certain
sectors. These include:
Portland Cement MACT standards: In December 2012, the EPA issued final amendments to the 2010
clean air standards for the cement manufacturing industry, including emissions of mercury, hydrochloric
61 http://www.epa.gov/mats/basic.html
62 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/04/01/epa-finalizes-pollution-standards-for-new-power-plants/
63 http://www2.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/learn-about-toxics-release-inventory
64 http://www2.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/basics-tri-reporting
http://www.epa.gov/mats/basic.htmlhttp://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/04/01/epa-finalizes-pollution-standards-for-new-power-plants/http://www2.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/learn-about-toxics-release-inventoryhttp://www2.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program/basics-tri-reporting
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
22
acid and particulate matter. The final air toxics rule retains emission limits for mercury, acid gases and
total hydrocarbons from the 2010 rules, along with retaining requirements that kilns continuously monitor
compliance with limits for mercury, total hydrocarbons and particulate matter.65
Boiler standards: In December 2012, the EPA released its final Clean Air Act standards for industrial
boilers and incinerators, aimed at reducing toxic air pollution including mercury, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen
chloride and particulates, but said these will apply to less than 1 percent of those machines. The
standards now cover only the highest emitting boilers and incinerators, typically operating at refineries,
chemical plants and other industrial facilities. The other 99 percent of the approximately 1.5 million boilers
in the US either aren’t covered by the rules because they burn clean natural gas at area source facilities
and emit little pollution, or can meet the new standards by conducting periodic maintenance or regular
tune-ups, according to the EPA.
Standards and Certifications
The air pollution control market is driven mostly by regulations, not by voluntary standards. However, it’s
worth noting that several of the pollutants discussed in this report are greenhouse gases, and subject to
GHG reporting guidelines. For example, the Greenhouse Gas Protocol covers accounting and reporting of
carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydroflurorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride.66
The protocol now requires nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) to be included in GHG inventories under the
Corporate Standard, Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard and the Product Standard. NF3 is primarily
65 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/12/26/boiler-standards-will-apply-to-less-than-1/
66 http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/corporate-standard
http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/12/26/boiler-standards-will-apply-to-less-than-1/http://www.ghgprotocol.org/standards/corporate-standard
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
23
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010*
VOCs 14,311 12,080 12,862 10,475 9,994 10,779 7,626 7,364 6,905
Carbon monoxide 16,899 10,771 9,250 7,216 5,853 5,791 4,479 3,583 3,114
PM10 8,668 4,074 3,027 1,339 1,306 1,232 874 1,259 1,245
Nitrogen oxides 1,215 698 666 891 891 873 943 1,121 1,088
Sulfur dioxide 7,101 4,729 3,807 2,467 1,901 1,638 1,418 1,016 792
PM2.5 795 748 638 570 430
Ammonia 352 365 176 230 151
US Emissions from Industrial Processes by Pollutant,
1970-2010 (thousand tons)
*The EPA has not yet published measured values for 2010. Because emissions from industrial sectors tend to stay fairly constant, it has repeated its measured 2008 values for 2010. This value will be updated in EPA's next inventory. Note: PM10 and PM2.5 data does not include condensibles. Source: EPA National Emissions Inventory
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
24
produced in the manufacture of semiconductors and LCD panels, and certain types of solar panels and
chemical lasers.67
Latest Developments in Air Pollution Controls
US and Global Markets
Air quality management in the US has improved considerably over the past several decades. Since 1970,
industrial processes have found reductions in emissions of a number of pollutants, including carbon
monoxide and sulfur dioxide (see chart, previous page). VOC emissions have seen a few spikes but fallen
significantly since 1970. PM10 has also seen a long-term reduction although it is up on 2000 levels.
Nitrogen oxides, on the other hand, after an initial drop back in the early 1970s, have almost returned to
1970 levels.
The EPA’s data on ammonia and PM2.5 doesn’t go back as far, but since 1990 industry has found
significant reductions in these areas.
Looking specifically at the electricity sector, in 2011 power plant NOx and SO2 emissions were 70 percent
and 72 percent lower than in 1990, when Congress passed major amendments to the Clean Air Act. But
the emissions reductions are largely due to increased use of natural gas and growing reliance
on renewable energy – rather than to emissions controls.
To find these reductions and cope with regulatory pressures, companies are spending heavily on
emissions control equipment. The McIlvaine Company projects that the world market for air filtration and
air pollution control will reach $44.39 billion this year, with the power sector spending the lion’s share at
67 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/05/28/why-reporting-nitrogen-trifluoride-matters/
http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/05/28/why-reporting-nitrogen-trifluoride-matters/
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
25
over $20 billion (see chart, next page).68 China will be a major player, spending just under $19 billion on
air pollution control systems, consumables and instrumentation this year.69
As of November 2012, power plants around the world had 968 air pollution control projects underway and
due to be completed in 2013. Over half are in Asia.70 The most popular control devices for new power
plants are scrubbers, selective catalytic reduction systems and fabric filters, while older plants are being
retrofitted with a variety of SO2, NOx, and mercury reduction controls.
Several other industries, including stone, metals, incinerators, steel, chemicals and wastewater, as well as
the commercial sector, will spend over $1 billion each on air pollution control this year. McIlvaine notes
that cement plants need expensive particulate control equipment, scrubbers and non-selective catalytic
reduction equipment. Municipal wastewater plants, meanwhile, are buying activated carbon filters,
biofilters and chemical scrubbers.71
In 2013, McIlvaine expects the air and gas measurement market to reach $4.5 billion. This includes not
just measurement of emissions into surrounding air, but also indoor air, process air and so on.72
68 http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/387-nr1709
69 http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/385-nr1707
70 http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/370-nr1693
71 http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/367-nr1690
72 http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/398-nr1720
http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/387-nr1709http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/385-nr1707http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/370-nr1693http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/367-nr1690http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/398-nr1720
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
26
Adoption by Businesses
Owens Corning: See Q&A.
Alcoa: The company says its In-Duct Scrubber, under construction as part of a commercial-scale
demonstration project at the company’s baked anode and calcined coke facility in Lake Charles, La., will
$3,067
$2,617
$1,853 $1,772
$1,577 $1,331
$1,286
$961 $907 $813 $710 $690 $629 $522 $344 $342 $323 $290 $216 $114 $86
$3,905
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
$4,500
$5,000
World Industrial Air Pollution Control Market, by Industry
Projections for 2013 ($ millions)
Source: The McIlvaine Company, "Air Pollution Management"
$20,035
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
27
remove up to 90 percent of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter and hydrogen fluoride emissions at the plant.
Alcoa expects commissioning and on-site testing of the project to be complete in August 2014.73
Doe Run: In preparation for EPA sulfur dioxide standards, the company’s Buick Resource Recycling
Division began installing technology in 2011 that decreases SO2 emissions. Meanwhile, the company’s
Primary Smelting Division has cut lead concentrations in ambient air around its Herculaneum, Mo.,
smelter. As of November 2011, the smelter reduced the rolling three-month average for ambient air lead
concentration to below 0.6 micrograms per cubic meter of air - a 25 percent reduction from the 2011
average level.74
AEP: The power company reduced its total SO2 emissions by 52 percent between 2000 and 2011, from
1.1 million tons to just over half a million tons, primarily by adding scrubbers to approximately 7,900 MW
of coal-fired generating capacity, according to a report by M.J. Bradley & Associates, sponsored by
Ceres, NRDC, Entergy Corporation, Exelon, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, PSEG, Tenaska and
Bank of America.75
Duke Energy: The company is spending $400 million to install two selective catalytic reduction units as
well as dry sorbent injection systems at its coal-fired Cayuga power plant, on top of the roughly $500
million it spent on two scrubbers for the plant in 2008. The company is carrying out the SCR project to
comply with the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard. Since 1990, Duke’s sulfur dioxide emissions have
fallen more than 84 percent and nitrogen oxide more than 73 percent, through control equipment, use of
low-sulfur fuel, and changes to the company’s fuel mix.76
73 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/06/03/alcoas-scrubber-technology-reduces-emissions-water-energy/
74 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/03/01/doe-run-sustainability-report-environmental-capital-spending-jumps-45/
75 http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/05/17/power-plants-cut-co2-emissions-7-in-three-years/
76 http://www.pennenergy.com/articles/pennenergy/2013/07/duke-invests-400mm-in-pollution-control-at-cayuga-coal-power-plant.html
http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/06/03/alcoas-scrubber-technology-reduces-emissions-water-energy/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/03/01/doe-run-sustainability-report-environmental-capital-spending-jumps-45/http://www.environmentalleader.com/2013/05/17/power-plants-cut-co2-emissions-7-in-three-years/http://www.pennenergy.com/articles/pennenergy/2013/07/duke-invests-400mm-in-pollution-control-at-cayuga-coal-power-plant.html
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
28
The Future of Air Pollution Controls
Projections
Next year, The McIlvaine Company predicts a $48.9 billion world market for air pollution control, with the
biggest portion - $11.7 billion – going into fabric filter bags and systems (see chart, above). Power plants
41%
34%
11%
14%
$6,800
$7,600
$4,600
$7,500
$8,700
$2,000
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
Fabric filter Industrial scrubbers and
adsorbers
Electrostatic precipitators
Air monitoring Power plant flue gas
desulfurization
NOx control Stationary thermal and
catalytic treatment
World Air Pollution Control Revenues by Technology,
2014 ($ millions) and Breakdown of Fabric Filter Market (%)
Bags - media
Bags - other
Systems - equipment
Systems - other
$11,700
Fabric Filter Market Breakdown
Source: The McIlvaine Company, "Air Pollution Management" and "World Fabric Filter and Element Market"
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
29
will account for more than 50 percent of the total air pollution market, and the chemical, refinery, oil and
gas, steel, mining and cement industries will also make pollution control purchases.
By 2020, McIlvaine expects China to have four times the coal-fired capacity of the US, driving huge
growth in the selective catalytic converter market there. The country is also upgrading existing power
plants to met NOx and particulate limits. While the US industry spends millions of dollars on lawsuits to
contest controls for about 50,000 MW, McIlvaine notes, “China is stepping up to the plate and committing
to 1,100,000 MW of SCR over the same timeframe.”77
India will be a strong pollution control market, as it is also building a sizeable number of new coal-fired
power plants and is addressing pollution from steel mills, cement plants and refineries. Vietnam and
Indonesia will also be major buyers in the market.78
Air Pollution Controls: What does all this mean?
Air emissions control is an essential component of sustainability and compliance for companies in many
sectors.
Control technology is evolving as governments push for tighter and tighter emissions limits.
Companies must stay on top of evolving regulations to predict future emissions control needs, which
could be expensive.
77 http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/350-nr1673
78 http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/387-nr1709
http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/350-nr1673http://home.mcilvainecompany.com/index.php/component/content/article/7-news/387-nr1709
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
30
Q&A
Frank O'Brien-Bernini, VP, Chief Sustainability Officer, Owens Corning (1-800-438-7465)
What air pollution control devices do you use - bag houses, scrubbers, carbon adsorbers,
adsorption towers, cyclones, vapor condensers, electrostatic precipitators (dry or wet), flares,
afterburners, catalytic oxidizers, biofilters?
We use a full array of state-of-the-art control devices (including bag houses, scrubbers, cyclones,
electrostatic precipitators (dry and wet), regenerative thermal oxidizers, incinerators, bio-treatments).
Where possible, we maximize energy use by using heat recovery for other process needs.
What make/model of these devices do you use?
This would be a long list and likely considered proprietary by our operations folks…although much of this
detail is available in our environmental permits.
What process controls do you use to control your air emissions?
Our preferred approach to environmental emissions reductions is through source reduction rather than
added control devices. This is a much more resource efficient approach. For example, much of our recent
reductions in particulate and toxic air emissions came through the 2011 conversion of our residential
insulation products to EcoTouch Insulation with PureFiber Technology, a product that is certified to
include a minimum of 58% total recycled content, Greenguard verified to be formaldehyde-free and
contains more than 99% natural ingredients (% natural defined by weight of natural materials consisting of
minerals and plant-based compounds). The product that this innovation replaced had lower recycled
content and used a phenol-formaldehyde type technology. The conversion was designed, and succeeded,
in producing a superior product with a lower environmental footprint.
What emissions do these devices and controls capture/prevent?
HAPS, particulate, NOx, VOCs.
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
31
Which devices or controls do you think have made the biggest contributions to reducing your air
emissions?
Product and/or process design changes to eliminate emissions at the source.
What have the benefits of these projects been? (Please quantify if possible, for example % or
tons-per-year reduction, with baseline year and end year specified)
We recently published our 7th sustainability report where we posted our environmental footprint intensity
reductions, from a baseline in 2002 through 2012 (10 year progress) as:
Goal Actual reduction
Energy -25% -30%
Greenhouse gas -30% -34%
Nitrogen oxides -25% -74%
Volatile organic compounds -25% -33%
Particulates -20% -36%
Waste to landfill -35% -35%
Water -15% -38%
What challenges have you encountered as you sought ways to lower your emissions?
It’s hard work and often requires product/process modifications to be affordable.
Have some of your pollution control devices raised energy consumption?
Yes, however (as noted above) where possible, we maximize energy use by using heat recovery for other
process needs.
EL Insights | © 2013 Environmental Leader LLC. Single license EL PRO subscription can be used by one person. For multiple users, purchase an enterprise license by emailing [email protected] for information.
32
How do you dispose of the waste that these devices collect? Was it challenging to find disposal
solutions?
Our preferred approach is to reintroduce the captured materials back into our process. This is often
possible.
What are the capital and operating costs of these devices? Have you received any subsidies or
financial incentives - if so, which?
I am not aware of any incentives we’ve received specifically for control devices.