in the maharashtra administrative tribunal mumbai

M.A 105/2021 in O.A 191/2021

Shri D.M Sawant ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors ... Respondents

1. Heard Shri U.V Bhosle, learned advocate for the applicant and Ms Archana B.K, learned P.O for the Respondents.

2. The present matter be de-tagged from the group of -natters, i.e. M.A 244/2019 in O.A 1080/2018 and others.

S.0 to 14.10.2021.

1:1

Medha adg ) (Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson

kn

[PTO.

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN

Original Application No.

of 20

of 20

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or

directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal' s orders

12.10.2021

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20


Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

Appearance, Tribunal's orders or

directions and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.10.2021

O.A.No.350 of 2020

Dr. Shaikh M.A.S. ....Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents.

1. Heard Ms Asawari Ghate holding for Smt.Punam

Mahajan, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Shri A. J.

Chougule, learned Presenting Officer holding for Ms S.P.

Manchekar, learned Chief Presenting Officer for the

Respondents.

2. Learned P.O. submits that the matter is being

conducted by learned C.P.O. but she is unwell, and therefore,

requested for adjournment.

3. S.O. to 20.10.2021

(A.P. Kurhekar) Member(J)

vsm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISM.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHAR.ASHTRA. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.10.2021

O.A.No.752 of 2021

R. J. Bhosale ....Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Ms Asawari Ghate holding for Smt. Punam

Mahajan, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Shri A. J.

Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. The Applicant has challenged the transfer order dated

09.08.2021 whereby he is transferred from the post of Circle

Officer, Wadala, Tahasil Office, Dist. Solapur to Circle Officer,

Ghodegaon Circle, Tahsil Office, Barshi, Dist. Solapur.

3. The Applicant contends that he has not completed

normal tenure of six years but transferred mid-term and mid-

tenure. He further contends that he is suffering from 40%

disability of visual impairment in both eyes, and therefore, his

options ought to have been considered preference wise.

4. Learned Counsel for the Applicant however fairly

concedes that the Applicant has been relieved and joined at

Godegaon Circle. This being the position, now the question

of interim relief does not survive.

5. However, O.A. has beetwar-0(pedited since prima-

facie the Applicant is transferred, as if, he is due for general

transfer as seen from the transfer order dated 09.08.2021.

[PTO.

2




Tribunal' s orders

6. Learned P.O. therefore directed to take instructions

and to file reply by next date. In the meantime, issue notice

before admission returnable on 28.10.2021.

7. Tribunal may take the case for final disposal at this

stage and separate notice for final disposal shall not be

issued.

8. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on

Respondents intimation/notice of date of hearing duly

authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper book of

0.A.. Respondents are put to notice that the case would be

taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission hearing.

9. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11 of the

Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules,

1988, and the questions such as limitation and alternate

remedy are kept open.

10. The service may be done by Hand delivery, speed

post, courier and acknowledgement be obtained and

produced along with affidavit of compliance in the Registry

within one week. Applicant is directed to file Affidavit of

compliance and notice.

11. In case notice is not collected within three days or

service report on affidavit is not filed 3 days before

returnable date, Original Application shall stand dismissed

without reference to Tribunal and papers be consigned to

record.

12. S.O. to 28.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member(J)

%Ism

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.10.2021

O.A.No.776 of 2021

S. P. Jadhav ....Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri Sachin Hande, learned Counsel for the

Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer

for the Respondents.

2. The Applicant has filed the present O.A. seeking

direction to the Respondents to consider his representation

for transfer in view of Circular dated 11.07.2000 which inter-

alia provides for preference to Government servant who has

worked in tribal area.

3. The Applicant joined as Sub-Inspector, Excise

Department at Palghar in August, 2018 and admittedly has

not completed his normal tenure so as to consider him due

for transfer.

4. Insofar as Circular dated 11.07.2000 is concerned, it

speaks about giving preference to choices given by a

Government servant who have worked in tribal area. Indeed,

as per Para 2 of Circular dated 11.07.2000 where a

Government servant of Group C & D have worked for three

years in tribal area then they should be given posting as per

their choice. It further provides where a Government servant

of Group A & B worked for two years in tribal area, they

should be also given posting as per their options. Thus, it is

quite clear that Circular dated 11.07.2000 has to be

considered when a Government servant is due for transfer

whereas in present case, the Applicant was not at all due for

transfer since has not completed normal tenure in the

present post. Therefore, O.A. itself is premature and not

maintainable.

5. The Applicant is at liberty to make representation be

which would dealt with by the Respondents in accordance to

rules.

6. No order as to costs.


HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2




Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.10.2021

O.A.No. 706 of 2021

S. D. Nalavade ....Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar , learned Counsel for

the Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondents.

2. The Applicant has challenged the transfer order dated

30.08.2021 whereby he is transferred from the post of Head

Master, Government Technical School, Nashik to Principal,

ITI, Alapalli, Dist. Gadchiroli.

3. When the matter was taken up for consideration of

interim relief and admission, learned Counsel for the

Applicant states that his client is also ready to go to Mahad or

Dhule or in Palghar District. Therefore, interim relief to the

extent of non posting of a Government servant in place of the

Applicant at Nashik was only granted and the matter was

adjourned to explore further development.

4. Today, learned P.O. has tendered the file which

shows that the Civil Services Board as well as the Hon'ble

Chief Minister has approved the modification in the transfer

order posting him at Mahad.

5. Learned P.O. on instructions further submits that the

order to that effect will be issued tomorrow.

6. Thus, now the Applicant is being posted at Mahad as

per his option and grievance stands redressed.

7. In view of above, O.A. is disposed of with no order as

to costs.

8. Interim relief granted by the Tribunal on 16.09.2021

stands vacated.


vsm

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISD1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date : 12.10.2021

O.A.No.83 of 2021

M. S. Deo ....Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri A. V. Bandiwadekar, learned Counsel for

the Applicant and Shri A. J. Chougule, learned Presenting


2. At the very outset, learned Counsel for the Applicant

and learned P.O. pointed out that similar O.A. is already fixed

on 18.10.2021. Hence, this O.A. be also kept on that day.

3. S.O. to 18.10.2021.


vsm

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) !Sp', MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20


Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearance, Tribunal's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.648 of 2021

M.M. Thakur Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Shri Arvind V. Bandiwadekar, learned

Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule,

learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. On request of learned P.0 two weeks time is

granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply.

3. In mean time office objections be removed.

4 S.O. to 27.10.2021.

\INP- (A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSpl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.654 of 2021

S.R. Shete Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Smt. Punam Mahajan, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned

Presenting Officer for the Respondents.



3. S.O. to 29.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

(PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.692 of 2021

V.S. Patil & Ors. Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri K.R. Jagdale, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting


2. On request of learned P.O two weeks time is


3. S.O. to 27.10.2021.

it,SPPI>

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISO.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Appearance, Tribunal's orders or__


Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.599 of 2021 with O.A. No.600 of 2021

A.T. Chowdhar

P.L. Shinde Applicant

Versus



for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned



granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply by way of last

chance with specific directions that no further time will

be gratned.

3. S.O. to 26.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp!.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.617 of 2021

M.K. Mohite Applicant

Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Respondents.

1. Heard Ms. Advaita M. Lonkar, learned Advocate

holding for Shri M.D. Lonkar, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting




3. S.O. to 27.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar) Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P.() J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Appearance, Tribunal's orders or —


Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.646 of 2021

T.A. Sayyad Applicant


1. Heard Shri Nagnath Bhumkar, learned Advocate

for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned



granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply by way of last

chance.

3. S.O. to 26.10.2021.


NMN

[RTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARliSHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

M.A. No.316 of 2021 in O.A. No.658 of 2021

P.R. Kshirsagar Applicant Versus


1. Heard Ms. S.T. Suryawanshi, learned Advocate

holding for Shri V.V. Joshi, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting


2. On request of learned P.O. two weeks time is

granted for filing Affidavit-in-Reply to M.A.

3. S.O. to 28.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAIIARASHTR.A ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.264 of 2021

C.S. Sanap .......Applicant


1. Heard Shri Gaurav A. Bandiwadekar, learned



2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that

the Applicant is already reinstated in service and has

joined at Sindhudurg. He has tendered copy of

reinstatement order dated 30.04.2021. It is taken on

record and marked by letter 'X' for identification

purposes.

3. In view of above, O.A. is disposed of with no

order as to costs.


NMN

[PTO

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P. J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MIJMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.663 of 2021

K.S. Adhe Applicant



for the Applicant Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting

Officer for the Respondent and Smt. Rekha Musale,

learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

2. Today learned P.O. has filed Affidavit-in-Reply on

behalf of the Respondent No.1. It is taken on record.

3. On request of learned Advocate for the

Applicant two weeks time is granted for filing Rejoinder.

4. In this O.A., M.A. No.407/2021 is filed for

intervention.

5. Heard Shri A.B. Tajane, learned Advocate for the

Applicant in M.A. No.407/2021.

6. Learned Advocate for the Applicant in Original

Application sought time to file Reply to the intervention

Application, two weeks time is granted.

7. S.O. to 26.10.2021.


NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) 1Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARA.SHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Date: 12.10.2021

M.A. No.421 of 2021 in M.A. No.196 of 2021

in O.A. No.41 of 2021

E.B. Sayyed Applicant

Versus



Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K.,


2. This M.A. is filed for amendment of O.A. to

incorporate certain additional factual aspects to

facilitate due consideration of the claim for pension.

3. The proposed amendment will not change

nature of O.A. On the contrary it will assist the Tribunal

for proper adjudication of the issue involved in O.A.

Hence M.A. for amendment is allowed.

4. Amendment be carried out within a week.

5. Respondents shall file additional Reply to the

amendment in O.A. within two weeks.

6. In view of above, M.A. No.421/2021 is disposed

of with no order as to costs.

7. S.O. to 26.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN [PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000--4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.221 of 2021

K.M. Gund Applicant


1. Heard Shri Utkarsh Desai, learned Advocate

holding for Shri P.S. Bhavake, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri AJ. Chougule, learned Presenting




3. S.O. to 26.10.2021.


NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.510 of 2021

S.J. Pendharkar @ A d/o. K. Doijad Applicant

Versus


1. Applicant and his Advocate both are absent.

2. Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned P,O. for the

Respondents is present.

3 On request of learned P.O two weeks time is


4. S.O. to 26.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (1)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.541 of 2021

S.R. Kakad Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri K.R. Jagdale, learned Advocate for the

Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting




3. S.O. to 26.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) [Sp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAIIARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.581 of 2021

A.S. Rege Applicant



for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned


2. Learned P.O. submits that Affidavit-in-Reply is

under preparation and same will be filed during the

course of the day. Statement is accepted. It be taken on

record.

3 O.A. be kept for hearing at the stage of

admission with liberty to file Rejoinder, if any on next

date.

4. S.O. 29.10.2021.

‘)■1?,


NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

C.A. No.33 of 2021 in O.A. No.148 of 2020

S.D. Mane (ir) Jankar Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri Y.B. Lengare, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. PO submits that the order has been partly complied with. She submits that proposal for provisional pension from 1.12.2020 to 31.5.2021 has been send to the Treasury and will be deposited in the account shortly. As far as fixation of pay as per 7th Pay Commission is concerned, it cannot be fixed.

3. We have perused the short affidavit dated 28.9.2021 of respondent no.4 and as per chart at page 82, payment is made under 9 (nine) heads.

4. Ld. Advocate for the applicant submits that he wants to approach the Court, which had passed the order dated 5.3.2021 in the above OA for clarification as to what benefits can be paid during pendency of criminal case.

5. Ld. Advocate for the applicant is, directed to show specific provision or rule that pay fixation can be done during pendency of the criminal case and so also commutation benefits.

6. It is expected from the State to continuously pay well in time the provisional pension and the applicant should be required to approach the Tribunal for this purpose.

7. S.O. to 30.11.2021.

k2- Nit t- I

(Medh Gad II) I (Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgi)

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4 2019) [Sp', MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

M.A. No.355 of 2021 in O.A. No.626 of 2017

S.B. Wategaonkar Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri Y.B. Lengare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for Respondents No.1 & 2 and Shri K.R. Jagdale, learned Advocate for Respondent No.3.

2. Ld. PO and Ld. Advocate for respondent no.3 seeks time to file reply.

3. S.O. to 26.10.2021 by way of last chance.

(M1dha adgil) J (Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) ----------

Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgj)

[RTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.1 J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

M.A. No.164 of 2021 in O.A. No.38 of 2021

Dr. Vivek V. Patil & Anr. Vs.


..Applicants

..Respondents

Heard Ms. Asawari Ghati holding for Smt. Punam Mahajan, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad. learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant seeks one week's time to take further instructions from the applicant.

3. S.O. to 26.10.2021.

(MecliGad 11) Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.1).) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

M.A. No.120 of 2021 in O.A. No.105 of 2020

A.H. Waghmare Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri T.V. Jadhav holding for Shri R.K. Mendadkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. Ld. Advocate for the applicant has filed this MA No.120 of 2021 in above OA No.105 of 2020 for condonation of delay. He submits that respondent no.2 passed the impugned order on 14.12.2017 which was not communicated to the applicant and he came to know the same when respondent no.3 passed the impugned order dated 7.5.2018 based on the order dated 14.12.2017. The applicant has received the order dated 14.12.2017 on 7.5.2018. However, before passing the order dated 7.5.2018 the applicant has approached the Hon'ble High Court by filing W.P. No.1283 of 2018 on 21.12.2017 for pursuing legal action as per law of limitation. Therefore, this period has to be excluded. However, there is still delay of 9 months in filing OA.

3. Ld. PO opposes the MA for condonation of delay.

4. Looking into the facts of the matter, we condone the delay in the interest of justice as the applicant was pursuing legal remedy in the Hon'ble High Court.

5. MA for condonation is allowed.

(Med a Ga gil) (Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgi)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.105 of 2020

A.H. Waghmare ..Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents

Heard Shri T.V. Jadhav holding for Shri R.K. Mendadkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. The office objections, if any, are to be removed and court-fees to be paid, if not already paid.

3. Issue notice before admission returnable on 24.11.2021. The respondents are directed to file reply.

4. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on Respondents intimation/notice of date of hearing duly authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper book of O.A. Private service is allowed in view of this present COVID-19 Pandemic situation. Respondents are put to notice that the case would be taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission hearing.

5. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1988, and the questions such as limitation and alternate remedy are kept open.

6. The service may be done by hand delivery/ speed post/courier and acknowledgement be obtained and produced along with affidavit of compliance in the Registry within one week. Applicant is directed to file affidavit of compliance and notice.

2'\

(sgi)

(Medh Member (A) 12.10.2021

(Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson 12.10.2021

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpl.- MAT-F -2 E.

IN THE MABARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.758 of 2021

A.B. Suryawanshi Applicant

Versus


1. Heard Shri Siddhesh Pilankar, learned Advocate

holding for Shri U.P. Warunjikar, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting


2. The Applicant is seeking retiral benefits in view

of retirement on 31.05.2021.

3. Issue notice before admission returnable on

16.11.2021.

4. Tribunal may take the case for final disposal at

this stage and separate notice for final disposal shall not

be issued.

5. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on

Respondents intimation/notice of date of hearing duly

authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper

book of Original Application. Respondents are put to

notice that the case would be taken up for final disposal

at the stage of admission hearing.

6. This intimation/notice is ordered under Rule 11

of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Procedure)

Rules, 1988, and the questions such as limitation and

alternate remedy are kept open.

7, The service may be done by Hand delivery,

speed post, courier and acknowledgement be obtained

and produced along with affidavit of compliance in the

Registry within one week. Applicant is directed to file

Affidavit of compliance and notice.

[P7:0

2

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Comm,



Tribunal' s orders

8. In case notice is not collected within seven days

or service report on affidavit is not filed 7 days before

returnable date, Original Application shall stand

dismissed without reference to Tribunal and papers be

consigned to record.

9. S.O. to 16.11.2021.

4Lk±' (A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P. J 27:37 (50,000—F2019) MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A.

IN


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.757 of 2021

A.N. Bharmal Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .....Respondents.

1. Heard Shri L.S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting


2. The Applicant has challenged transfer order

dated 06.09.2021 whereby he is shown transferred mid-

term and mid-tenure on administrative ground from

Government Ashram School at Titawe, Tal. Dindori, Dist.

Nashik to Government Ashram School at Ambe, Tal.

Pethe, Dist. Nashik.

3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has pointed

out that only reason for transfer of the Applicant mid-

term and mid-tenure is to accommodate Respondent

No.4.

4. Since, the Applicant was already relieved, no

interim relief was granted but matter was expedited.

5. Interestingly as seen from the letter dated

03.09.2021 tendered by learned P.O. the Applicant is

shifted mid-term and mid-tenure only to accommodate

Respondent No.4 and there was no other reason, much

less administrative exigencies for transfer of the

Applicant.

6. Learned P.O. submits that he be allowed to file

short Affidavit-in-Reply and to produce the record and

to find out the reason for transfer and thereafter only

the O.A. be decided. [P

2




Tribunal' s orders

7. Adjourned for tomorrow for filing Affidavit-in-

Reply without fail.

8. Learned P.O. is also directed to produce relevant

record tomorrow.

9. S.O. to 13.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (1) NMN

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

Medha Gadgil) (Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson

p,A,tuiudj- 2

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARA.SHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

12.10.2021

O.A 725/2021

Smt Yogita P. Madikunt ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Smt Punam Mahajan, learned advocate for the applicant and Smt Kranti S. Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents.

2. Issue notice before admission made returnable on 22.11.2021.

3. Applicant is authorized and directed to serve on Respondents intimation/notice of date of hearing duly authenticated by Registry, along with complete paper book of O.A. Private service is allowed in view of this present COVID-19 Pandemic situation. Respondents are put to notice that the case may be taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission hearing.


5. The service may be done by hand delivery/ speed post/courier and acknowledgement be obtained and produced along with affidavit of compliance in the Registry within one week before returnable date or on the same date. Applicant is directed to file affidavit of compliance and notice.

6. Learned counsel submits that she be heard on the point of interim relief on the next date.

7. S.0 to 22.11.2021.

Akn

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

vt AA'A k '

(Mridula Bhatkar, J.) Chairperson

(Medaadgi Member (A)

AX

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

IN


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

12.10.2021

0.A 683/2021

Shri S.D Kulkarni ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra 86 Ors ... Respondents

Heard U.V Bhosle, learned advocate for the applicant and Smt K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the appeal dated 31.1.2014 regarding stoppage of pension filed by the applicant is pending before His Excellency The Governor of Maharashtra.

Learned P.O produces copy of letter dated 11 to October, 2021 singed by Shri Jagdish Gupta, Principal Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, addressed to the Secretary to His Excellency The Governor of Maharashtra.

z We hereby direct the Principal Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, to pursue the matter with the office cf His Excellency The Governor of Maharashtra and i ltimate the progress on the next date.

5. S.0 to 20.10.2021. Hamdast.

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

G.C.P.() J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal's orders

12.10.2021

0.A 664/2021

Shri B.Y Hegade ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Ms Asawari Ghate i/b Mrs Punam Mahajan, learned advocate for the applicant and Mrs K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents.

2. Matter is fixed on 25.11.2021, till then status quo to continue.

(Medh/Ga adgi ) Member (A)

Akn


[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpi.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

12.10.2021

0.A 430/2021

Shri C.N Desale ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Shri B.A Bandiwadekar, learned advocate for the applicant and Smt K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents.

2. Admit. Place for final hearing on 8.12.2021.


[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) iSp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAHARASHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MIJMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



directions and Registrar's orders Tribunal's orders

12.10.2021

0.A 146/2021

Shri S.A Bhosale ... Applicant Vs.


1. Heard Shri B.A Bandiwadekar, learned advocate for the applicant and Mrs K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents.

2. Learned P.O seeks time to file affidavit in reply.

3. Six weeks' time is granted to file affidavit in reply by way of last chance.

4. S.0 to 24.11.2021.

Medha Gadgil) Member (A)

Akn


[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal's orders

12.10.2021

0.A 794/2020

Smt N.N Chavan & Ore-. ... Applicants Vs.


1. None for the applicants. Heard Mrs K.S Gaikwad, learned P.O for the Respondents.

2. Admit. Place for final hearing on 1.12.2021.

(Medha Gadgil) Member (A)

Akn

)),AAA t ti01- (Mridula Bhatkar, J.)

Chairperson

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.791 of 2021

Rajashree S. Gandhi Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Shri K.R. Jagdale, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. The applicant is seeking promotion to the post of ACP/Dy.S.P. at par with her juniors/batchmates.


4. Issue notice before admissions returnable on 17.11.2021. The respondents are directed to file reply.




14/s1

(Medhadgil) (Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgj)

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.769 of 2021 with M.A. No.405 of 2021

P.D. Bombe Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Heard Ms. Preeti Walimbe, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. By this OA the applicant seeks to challenge the termination order dated 7.5.2021 passed by respondent no.2 by which he was terminated from the post of Blood Bank Scientific Officer 30%. By filing MA he seeks stay of the order dated 7.5.2021.






(Medha Gadgil) Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgj)

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(sgj)

(Medhadgil) Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

2


Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.761 of 2021

V.P. Bhoir Vs.


..Applicant

..Respondents

Applicant and Advocate both are absent. Heard Smt. Archana B.K., learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.






HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4 2019) [Spl.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20



Tribunal' s orders

M.A. No.344 of 2021 in O.A. No.691 of 2021

S.B. Chavan & 37 Ors. Vs.


..Applicants

..Respondents

Heard Shri K.R. Jagdale, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. The applicants are prosecuting for the same cause of action. For the reasons stated in the MA, leave to sue jointly as prayed for is granted, subject to the Applicants paying requisite court-fees, if not already paid. MA disposed off accordingly.

(MedVGadgil) (Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgj)

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

2


Tribunal' s orders

O.A. No.691 of 2021

S.B. Chavan & 37 Ors. Vs.


..Applicants

..Respondents

Heard Shri K.R. Jagdale, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting Officer for the Respondents.

2. The applicants are seeking directions to the respondents to revise the pension of the applicants countirw 25% of Non Practicing Allowance of basic pay under the 01 Pay Commission w.e.f. 1.1.2006 and counting the 35% Non Practicing Allowance of basic pay under the 6th Pay Commission w.e.f. 7.12.2012 with arrears.






Lafil pvakit.

(MeckillGad 1) Mridula R. Bhatkar, J.) Member (A) Chairperson 12.10.2021 12.10.2021

(sgj)

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpI.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.655 of 2020

Dr. K.S. Deshpande Applicant

Versus





2. On request of learned Advocate for the

Applicant one week time is granted for hearing.

3. S.O. to 20.10.2021.

‘142 \I\)

(A.P. Kurhekar)

Member (J)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISp1.- MAT-F-2 E.

IN THE MAIIARA.SHTRA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI

M.A./R.A./C.A. No. of 20

I N

Original Application No. of 20





Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.416 of 2021

D.M. Birajdar Applicant



Advocate for the Applicant and Smt. K.S. Gaikwad,


2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that

in this O.A. he has restricted his claim only to extent of

challenging order dated 13.03.2018 whereby his claim

for condonation of break in service has been rejected

and he is not claiming relief of Time Bound Promotion

or any other consequential benefits as prayed in para

9(a) of O.A. He further sought permission to amend

and delete relief clause suitably.

3. Allowed to amend prayer clause.


NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

(G.C.P.) J 2737 (50,000-4-2019) ISpI.- MAT-F-2 E.


M.A./R.A./C.A. No.

I N


of 20

of 20




Tribunal' s orders

Date: 12.10.2021

O.A. No.622 of 2020 with O.A. No.623 of 2020

M.R. Ahire

M.P. Shinde Applicant


1. Heard Shri Ganesh Masurkar, learned Advocate

holding for Shri C.T. Chandratre, learned Advocate for

the Applicant and Shri A.J. Chougule, learned Presenting


2. Learned Advocate Shri Ganesh Masurkar holding

for Shri C.T. Chandratre says that his senior Adv. Shri

C.T. Chandratre is not well and requested for two weeks

time for adjournment.

3. S.O. to 26.10.2021.

(A.P. Kurhekar) Member (1)

NMN

[PTO.

HP

Text Box

Sd/-

in the maharashtra administrative tribunal mumbai

Documents